<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; cheaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/cheaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Analyst: Cheaper iPhone Would Be a Bonanza for Apple</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110216/analyst-cheaper-iphone-would-be-a-bonanza-for-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110216/analyst-cheaper-iphone-would-be-a-bonanza-for-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installed base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower end]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toni Sacconaghi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=57961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Apple, a smaller, cheaper iPhone may be more than a means of entering the market for lower-end phones currently dominated by Android and Symbian--it could be the final step in the company's global smartphone dominance.
That's the theory put forth today by Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, who sees an iPhone Nano or Mini as an inevitability, one that would dramatically expand Apple’s addressable market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/iphone_photo.jpg" alt="" title="iphone_photo" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-29644" />For Apple, a smaller, cheaper iPhone may be more than a means of entering the market for lower-end phones currently dominated by Android and Symbian&#8211;it could be the final step in the company&#8217;s global smartphone dominance.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the theory put forth today by Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi, who believes Apple&#8217;s market-share aspirations for the iPhone are a lot like those for its iPod business. Sacconaghi sees an iPhone Nano or Mini as an inevitability, one that would dramatically expand Apple’s addressable market.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are surprised that Apple hasn&#8217;t moved sooner to introduce a lower priced offering that could help secure a more dominant installed base,&#8221; Sacconaghi said in a note to clients today. &#8220;After all, the smartphone world is a platform war, where first mover advantage and scale matters. The dual facts that (1) iPhone has not been available at several very important global carriers and that (2) it carries a very high price point have contributed to creating an opportunity for Android that has been successfully exploited. Particularly with Android now outselling iOS, the imperative for Apple to expand its installed base has never been higher.&#8221;</p>
<p>A scaled-down version of the iPhone with a cheaper data plan&#8211;or one that required no data plan at all&#8211;is one very obvious way of doing that. Roll out a device like that with a street price that falls somewhere between $149 and $199, says Sacconaghi, bring it those carriers that don&#8217;t yet offer the iPhone, and mass-market adoption will follow. Serious mass-market adoption.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is difficult to estimate the size of a market for a product that we don&#8217;t yet know the form-factor or timing for. But as a rough guide, we estimate that at an end-user price of $150-$200 and no data plan contract, Apple could address potentially all of the remaining smartphone segment, the non-smartphone postpaid segment, and about 15 percent of the non-smartphone prepaid segment. This would amount to an incremental 700M+ units and $90 billion in revenue in terms of market opportunity; even if Apple succeeded in capturing just 5 percent of these incremental units, it would add $12+ billion in revenues and $4.50+ in EPS.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110216/analyst-cheaper-iphone-would-be-a-bonanza-for-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Points Off for Windows?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090304/points-off-for-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090304/points-off-for-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TouchSmart IQ800t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPS One 24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yair Reiner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=14124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brave guy, Yair Reiner, for singlehandedly assailing the “Macs are more expensive” myth (or truism, depending on your particular world view). In a research note on Apple’s new desktops, the Oppenheimer analyst compared, spec-by-spec, the new iMac, Dell’s XPS One 24 and Hewlett-Packard’s TouchSmart IQ800t and concluded that the iMac offers a better value.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brave guy, Yair Reiner, for singlehandedly assailing the &#8220;Macs are more expensive&#8221; myth (or truism, depending on your particular worldview). In a research note on <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090303/new-from-apple-recession-macs/">Apple’s new desktops</a>, the Oppenheimer analyst compared, spec-by-spec, the new Apple (AAPL) iMac, Dell&#8217;s (DELL) XPS One 24 and Hewlett-Packard&#8217;s (HPQ) TouchSmart IQ800t and concluded that the iMac offers a better value (click on chart below to enlarge). “A side-by-side comparison suggests the new iMacs match up favorably against Dell and HP’s All-in-Ones on a price-to-performance basis,&#8221; Reiner wrote. &#8220;For example, the $1,499 model has a faster CPU and RAM with better or comparable graphics, and is still $100-$250 cheaper (though it lacks a TV Tuner, ~$60-$100 upgrade).”</p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/oppenheimer.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/oppenheimer-300x250.png" alt="oppenheimer" title="oppenheimer" width="300" height="250" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14123" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090304/points-off-for-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

