<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; chief technology officer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/chief-technology-officer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Google Buzz Exposes White House Deputy CTO (And Ex-Googler)</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100330/white-house-deputy-cto-and-former-google-lobbyist-on-buzz-what-should-i-do-turn-it-off/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100330/white-house-deputy-cto-and-former-google-lobbyist-on-buzz-what-should-i-do-turn-it-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew McLaughlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart's Big Goverment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Profile Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=37722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty funny. Among the many Gmail subscribers to have their private contacts exposed in the Google Buzz privacy fiasco was Andrew McLaughlin, the Obama administration’s deputy chief technology officer and Google’s former head of global public policy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/03/images6.jpeg" alt="" title="images" width="90" height="127" class="alignright size-full wp-image-37730" />This is pretty funny.</p>
<p>Among the many Gmail subscribers to have their private contacts exposed in the Google Buzz privacy fiasco was Andrew McLaughlin, the Obama administration’s deputy chief technology officer and Google’s former head of global public policy. </p>
<p>&#8220;So I see a big default privacy flaw in Buzz,&#8221; <a href="http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/03/30/google-buzz-privacy-flaw-snags-another-victim-white-house-deputy-cto-andrew-mclaughlin/">McLaughlin wrote in a Feb. 10 Buzz post uncovered by Breitbart&#8217;s Big Government</a> (click on image below to enlarge). &#8220;By default, Buzz adds the people you e-mail most as your &#8216;followers&#8217;, and then lists them on your public Google Profile Page. In other words, Google exposes the people you e-mail most, by default, to the world. That violates my sense of expectations&#8211;I expect the list of people I e-mail most to be kept private. What should I do? I guess I don’t really have an option other than turning off Buzz. Any other ideas?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure. Here’s one: How about no longer using your former employer’s email service to communicate privately with the folks you once worked with as a lobbyist for Google?<br />
Certainly seems unwise given the mandate of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.</p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/03/mclaughlanbuzz.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/03/mclaughlanbuzz-275x159.jpg" alt="" title="mclaughlanbuzz" width="275" height="159" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-37733" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/03/McLaughlinbuzz_2.png" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/03/McLaughlinbuzz_2-275x189.png" alt="" title="McLaughlinbuzz_2" width="275" height="189" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-37759" /></a></p>
<p>[Buzz image credit: <a href="http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/03/30/google-buzz-privacy-flaw-snags-another-victim-white-house-deputy-cto-andrew-mclaughlin/">Breitbart's Big Government</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100330/white-house-deputy-cto-and-former-google-lobbyist-on-buzz-what-should-i-do-turn-it-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMC Poaches Top Intel Exec</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[386]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[486]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrivals departures feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Enterprise Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Tucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Gelsinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thirty years at Intel was evidently more than enough for Pat Gelsinger. He’s giving up his job as senior VP of the company’s Digital Enterprise Group to run EMC’s storage-products operations, The Wall Street Journal reports.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/gelsinger-150x150.jpg" alt="gelsinger" title="gelsinger" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-24649" />Thirty years at Intel was evidently <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/intel-is-said-to-plot-an-executive-overhaul/">more than enough for Pat Gelsinger</a>. He’s giving up his job as senior VP of the company’s Digital Enterprise Group to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125290003881507947.html">run EMC&#8217;s storage-products operations</a>, The Wall Street Journal reports.</p>
<p>The move, which will be effective immediately upon its announcement, is quite a blow for Intel (INTC). Gelsinger had done stints as the company’s chief technology officer and as head of its research division. He helped quarterback Intel&#8217;s 386 and 486 processors, played a major role in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Nehalem">the launch of  Nehalem</a> and had been considered a likely successor to Intel CEO Paul Otellini. Now he’s a contender for the top job at EMC (EMC) when CEO Joe Tucci decides to step down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dude, Where&#039;s My Czar?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/dude-wheres-my-czar/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/dude-wheres-my-czar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief information officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission on Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberczar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Information Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Raduege Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Economic Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Charney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Add Melissa Hathaway to the list of cybersecurity experts who don’t want the job of White House cybersecurity czar. Hathaway, a former Bush administration official who led President Obama’s recent 60-day review of the federal government’s cybersecurity efforts, was thought to be a leading contender for the position. But according to The Wall Street Journal, she asked not to be considered for that post about two weeks ago, citing personal reasons. And now she’s resigned her current post as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/push_to_exit-300x213-150x150.jpg" alt="push_to_exit-300x213" title="push_to_exit-300x213" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-22726" />Add Melissa Hathaway to the list of cybersecurity experts who don’t want the job of White House cybersecurity czar. Hathaway, a former Bush administration official who led President Obama’s recent 60-day review of the federal government&#8217;s cybersecurity efforts, was thought to be a <a href="http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20090206_8235.php">leading contender for the position</a>. But <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124932480886002237.html">according to The Wall Street Journal</a>, she asked not to be considered for that post about two weeks ago, citing personal reasons. And now she’s resigned her current post as well.</p>
<p>An odd turn of events, considering Hathaway led the administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Cyberspace_Policy_Review_final.pdf">60-day review of governmentwide cybersecurity preparedness</a> and seemed its likely choice to head up the new cybersecurity office. With the post now vacant and <a href="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1680">the list of candidates who’ve been considered for the job rumored to have reached at least 30,</a> the administration may have a tough time finding the right person for this difficult job&#8211;and convincing him or her to accept it.</p>
<p>&#8220;As it stands right now, the cyber czar would have two bosses, the National Security Council and National Economic Council, as well as a chief information officer and chief technology officer,&#8221; <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/security/government/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218900535">Greg Garcia, former assistant secretary for cybersecurity and communications at the Department of Homeland Security, told Dark Reading</a>. &#8220;In addition, that individual would have to herd all of the cats at DHS and other agencies. Those are big shoes to fill&#8211;in fact, I&#8217;m skeptical that anyone could succeed in the [cyber czar] job.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Garcia’s not the only one. Among other <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/28/AR2009072802903.html">potential candidates who’ve reportedly told the White House they’re not interested</a>: former Republican U.S. Representative Tom Davis of northern Virginia, Microsoft (MSFT) executive Scott Charney, Symantec (SYMC) Chairman John Thompson and retired Air Force General Harry Raduege Jr., the former Defense Information Systems Agency director and co-chair of the Commission on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/dude-wheres-my-czar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dude, Where's My Czar?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/dude-wheres-my-czar-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/dude-wheres-my-czar-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief information officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commission on Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberczar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Information Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Garcia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Raduege Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Economic Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Charney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Add Melissa Hathaway to the list of cybersecurity experts who don’t want the job of White House cybersecurity czar. Hathaway, a former Bush administration official who led President Obama’s recent 60-day review of the federal government’s cybersecurity efforts, was thought to be a leading contender for the position. But according to The Wall Street Journal, she asked not to be considered for that post about two weeks ago, citing personal reasons. And now she’s resigned her current post as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/push_to_exit-300x213-150x150.jpg" alt="push_to_exit-300x213" title="push_to_exit-300x213" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-22726" />Add Melissa Hathaway to the list of cybersecurity experts who don’t want the job of White House cybersecurity czar. Hathaway, a former Bush administration official who led President Obama’s recent 60-day review of the federal government&#8217;s cybersecurity efforts, was thought to be a <a href="http://www.nextgov.com/nextgov/ng_20090206_8235.php">leading contender for the position</a>. But <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124932480886002237.html">according to The Wall Street Journal</a>, she asked not to be considered for that post about two weeks ago, citing personal reasons. And now she’s resigned her current post as well.</p>
<p>An odd turn of events, considering Hathaway led the administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/Cyberspace_Policy_Review_final.pdf">60-day review of governmentwide cybersecurity preparedness</a> and seemed its likely choice to head up the new cybersecurity office. With the post now vacant and <a href="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1680">the list of candidates who’ve been considered for the job rumored to have reached at least 30,</a> the administration may have a tough time finding the right person for this difficult job&#8211;and convincing him or her to accept it. </p>
<p>&#8220;As it stands right now, the cyber czar would have two bosses, the National Security Council and National Economic Council, as well as a chief information officer and chief technology officer,&#8221; <a href="http://www.darkreading.com/security/government/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218900535">Greg Garcia, former assistant secretary for cybersecurity and communications at the Department of Homeland Security, told Dark Reading</a>. &#8220;In addition, that individual would have to herd all of the cats at DHS and other agencies. Those are big shoes to fill&#8211;in fact, I&#8217;m skeptical that anyone could succeed in the [cyber czar] job.&#8221; </p>
<p>And Garcia’s not the only one. Among other <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/28/AR2009072802903.html">potential candidates who’ve reportedly told the White House they’re not interested</a>: former Republican U.S. Representative Tom Davis of northern Virginia, Microsoft (MSFT) executive Scott Charney, Symantec (SYMC) Chairman John Thompson and retired Air Force General Harry Raduege Jr., the former Defense Information Systems Agency director and co-chair of the Commission on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/dude-wheres-my-czar-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Co-Founder Steve Chen Moves On, Stays with Google</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090630/youtube-cofounder-steve-chen-moves-on-stays-with-google/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090630/youtube-cofounder-steve-chen-moves-on-stays-with-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashwin Navin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BitTorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Hurley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incubator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jawed Karim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Perrochon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[org chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricardo Reyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Chen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uploads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=8760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTube co-founder Steve Chen, who oversaw the company's technical operations as it grew from an upstart to the world's biggest video site, no longer works at the site day-to-day. This is old news, literally: Chen left his spot as chief technology officer last fall, though he remains employed at Google, which bought his company for $1.65 billion in 2006.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/steve-chen.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8761" title="steve-chen" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/steve-chen-250x187.png" alt="steve-chen" width="250" height="187" /></a>YouTube co-founder Steve Chen, who oversaw the company&#8217;s technical operations as it grew from an upstart to the world&#8217;s biggest video site, no longer works at the site day-to-day.</p>
<p>This is old news, literally: Chen left his spot as chief technology officer last fall, though he remains employed at Google (GOOG), which bought his company for $1.65 billion in 2006. &#8220;Steve shifted his focus to help with some Google engineering projects. He&#8217;s still involved with YouTube and invested in its success,&#8221; says YouTube spokesman Ricardo Reyes via email.</p>
<p>Google hasn&#8217;t officially named a replacement chief technology officer for Chen, and people at the company say the job no longer exists. But the highest ranking engineer at the company is now <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/louis-perrochon/0/50/b2b">Louis Perrochon</a>, who has been at Google since 2003.</p>
<p>Chad Hurley, who co-founded YouTube with Chen and Jawed Karim in 2004, remains the company&#8217;s CEO. But it&#8217;s not unusual for founders to move on from their companies within a few years of selling them.</p>
<p>The fact that Chen&#8217;s move  has gone unreported until now should underscore that his departure didn&#8217;t represent a major org chart reshuffling. The technical challenges of the site have long been handled by a large engineering team, which makes sense considering that the challenges themselves are large. YouTube now uploads <a href="http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=on4EmafA5MA">20 hours of video per minute</a>.</p>
<p>Chen was <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/11/06/ashwin-navin-leaving-bittorrent-forming-new-venture-with-youtubes-chen-others/">reportedly working on a technology incubator project</a> last fall along with BitTorrent co-founder Ashwin Navin; no word on what Chen is actually doing at Google now.</p>
<p>Here are Chen and Hurley in a video they shot and uploaded on Oct. 9, 2006, the day they sold their company to Google.</p>
<p><object width="350" height="283" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/QCVxQ_3Ejkg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QCVxQ_3Ejkg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090630/youtube-cofounder-steve-chen-moves-on-stays-with-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Googler&#039;s New White House Job Rankles Some</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090603/ex-googlers-new-white-house-job-rankles-some/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090603/ex-googlers-new-white-house-job-rankles-some/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew McLaughlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aneesh Chopra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=12372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew McLaughlin’s departure from Google to the Obama administration has prompted a little grumbling among some consumer advocates and the search giant’s corporate foes.

Mr. McLaughlin, who was Google’s head of global public policy and government affairs, is leaving Silicon Valley for Washington, D.C., to become a deputy to Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, who’s in charge of advancing the president’s tech agenda.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew McLaughlin’s departure from Google (GOOG) to the Obama administration has prompted a little grumbling among some consumer advocates and the search giant’s corporate foes.</p>
<p>Mr. McLaughlin, who was Google’s head of global public policy and government affairs, is leaving Silicon Valley for Washington, D.C., to become a deputy to Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, who’s in charge of advancing the president’s tech agenda.</p>
<p>The White House has declined to confirm Mr. McLaughlin’s appointment. Google has confirmed he’s left the company but remained mum about where he’s going.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, two consumer advocacy groups sent a letter to the White House asking administration officials to reconsider hiring Mr. McLaughlin, since he previously oversaw Google’s lobbying efforts.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/06/03/ex-googlers-new-white-house-job-rankles-some/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090603/ex-googlers-new-white-house-job-rankles-some/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Industry Cheers as Obama Taps Aneesh Chopra for CTO</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090418/tech-industry-cheers-as-obama-taps-aneesh-chopra-for-cto/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090418/tech-industry-cheers-as-obama-taps-aneesh-chopra-for-cto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aneesh Chopra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Zients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vivek Kundra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=10904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may not be the Cabinet-level post that some were hoping for, but President Obama finally named the U.S.’s first chief technology officer on Saturday morning during his weekly radio and Internet address.

Aneesh Chopra, currently Virginia’s secretary of technology, got the nod and will soon join his former colleague, Vivek Kundra, the national chief information officer, on a team tasked with using technology to make government more efficient.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may not be the Cabinet-level post that some were hoping for, but President Obama finally named the U.S.’s first chief technology officer on Saturday morning during his weekly radio and Internet address.</p>
<p>Aneesh Chopra, currently Virginia’s secretary of technology, got the nod and will soon join his former colleague Vivek Kundra, the national chief information officer, on a team tasked with using technology to make government more efficient. “Aneesh will promote technological innovation to help achieve our most urgent priorities&#8211;from creating jobs and reducing health care costs to keeping our nation secure,” Obama said in his Saturday radio address.</p>
<p>“Aneesh and Jeffrey [Zients, the newly appointed chief innovation officer] will work closely with our chief information officer, Vivek Kundra, who is responsible for setting technology policy across the government, and using technology to improve security, ensure transparency, and lower costs,” he said. During the campaign, the high tech community buzzed about who might fill the CTO slot, which the campaign suggested would be cabinet-level position.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/18/tech-industry-cheers-as-obama-taps-aneesh-chopra-for-cto/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090418/tech-industry-cheers-as-obama-taps-aneesh-chopra-for-cto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where in the World Is America&#039;s CTO?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090211/where-in-the-world-is-americas-cto/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090211/where-in-the-world-is-americas-cto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing with the Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Gips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAC/InterActiveCorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Level 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memorandum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Kapor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wozniak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkGeek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vint Cerf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=9627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the naming of Oracle President Charles Phillips to President Barack Obama's 16-Member Economic Recovery Advisory Board a few days ago, another Silicon Valley tech mandarin fell off the list to become America's first chief technology officer.

The job--which was promised by President Barack Obama during his campaign and underscored when he released a memorandum on transparency and open government that outlined some of the CTO duties the day after he was sworn in--remains unfilled.

While everyone is rightly focusing on the economic crisis, inquiring minds still want to know who is getting the job as head geek.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/02/will-not-fix.jpg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/02/will-not-fix-286x300.jpg" alt="" title="will-not-fix" width="286" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-9631" /></a></p>
<p>With the naming of Oracle (ORCL) President Charles Phillips to President Barack Obama&#8217;s 16-Member Economic Recovery Advisory Board a few days ago, another Silicon Valley tech mandarin fell off the list to become America&#8217;s first chief technology officer.</p>
<p>The job&#8211;which was promised by President Barack Obama during his campaign and underscored when he released a memorandum on transparency and open government that outlined some of the CTO duties the day after he was sworn in&#8211;remains unfilled.</p>
<p>In fact, so does the Federal Communications Commission chairman&#8217;s post, which <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090113/genachowski-to-head-fcc-maybe-he-can-finally-fix-my-broadband/">insiders said a month ago would go to former IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI) exec Julius Genachowski</a>. But he has not been nominated yet.</p>
<p>Both Genachowski and Phillips were on a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122671335356430343.html">short list floated in November by The Wall Street Journal</a> for CTO. The third name on it, Level 3 (LVLT) exec Don Gips, has since been named to a high-level White House job.</p>
<p>While the continuing economic crisis has sucked all the oxygen from the room, the Obama administration has still made a lot of promises about tech issues, from improving broadband to making the government more transparent and digital.</p>
<p>So, who is getting the job as head geek?</p>
<p>Could it be well-known entrepreneur Mitch Kapor? Google (GOOG) guru-in-resident and Internet father Vint Cerf? Or some other tech-savvy Silicon Valley figure?</p>
<p>BoomTown is, of course, rooting for Steve &#8220;Woz&#8221; Wozniak. Once <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090209/nerdy-dancing-all-that-woz/">he wins &#8220;Dancing With the Stars&#8221; this season</a>, he will be the only nerd capable of the two-stepping one needs to survive in Washington.</p>
<p>Post new guesses in comments below.</p>
<p>And, until someone is appointed to fix the nation&#8217;s computers, here is the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/">Jan. 21 memo Obama released</a> about some of the tasks ahead for America&#8217;s CTO:</p>
<p><em>MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES</p>
<p>SUBJECT: Transparency and Open Government</p>
<p>My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.</p>
<p><strong>Government should be transparent.</strong> Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing. Information maintained by the Federal Government is a national asset. My Administration will take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to disclose information rapidly in forms that the public can readily find and use. Executive departments and agencies should harness new technologies to put information about their operations and decisions online and readily available to the public. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public feedback to identify information of greatest use to the public.</p>
<p><strong>Government should be participatory.</strong> Public engagement enhances the Government’s effectiveness and improves the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and public officials benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge. Executive departments and agencies should offer Americans increased opportunities to participate in policymaking and to provide their Government with the benefits of their collective expertise and information. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public input on how we can increase and improve opportunities for public participation in Government.</p>
<p><strong>Government should be collaborative.</strong> Collaboration actively engages Americans in the work of their Government. Executive departments and agencies should use innovative tools, methods, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector. Executive departments and agencies should solicit public feedback to assess and improve their level of collaboration and to identify new opportunities for cooperation.</p>
<p>I direct the Chief Technology Officer, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Administrator of General Services, to coordinate the development by appropriate executive departments and agencies, within 120 days, of recommendations for an Open Government Directive, to be issued by the Director of OMB, that instructs executive departments and agencies to take specific actions implementing the principles set forth in this memorandum. The independent agencies should comply with the Open Government Directive.</p>
<p>This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.</p>
<p>This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.</p>
<p>BARACK OBAMA</em></p>
<p><em>[Photo of the t-shirt from <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com">ThinkGeek</a>.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090211/where-in-the-world-is-americas-cto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

