On Friday, Judge Marilyn Patel, who in 2000 issued the injunction that shut Napster down, dismissed Real’s antitrust claims against Disney (DIS) and other movie studios over their alleged collusion to block RealDVD, the company’s “legal” DVD ripper.

The studios and the DVD Copy Control Association, she found, were well within their rights to band together to prevent what they believed to be illegal copying of their content. Real was foolish to think otherwise, and its claim that it has suffered significant losses because of its inability to sell a product of questionable legality is, in a word, ludicrous.

Which is not to say that consumers should not have the right to copy and back up films they have legally purchased, just that the courts have never looked favorably on those who claim that right through a technology that bypasses DVD copy protection and consequently violates the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

“Real’s purported injury stems from its own decision to manufacture and traffic in a device that is almost certainly illegal under the DMCA,” Patel wrote. “In the circumstances of this case, there is no allegation Real could make that would give it antitrust standing.”

Court Opinion Dismissing Realnetworks Antitrust Case

PREVIOUSLY:

• RealNetworks Still Barred From the DVD Backup Business. Why Does RealNetworks Want to Be in the DVD Backup Business?
• RealDVD Launch Buffering…Buffering…
• Rent. Rip. Restraining Order.
• StealDVD? Well, You Were Asking for It…
• Sue. Rent. Rip. Return.
• Rent. Rip. Return.

The Sun notes that Discovery, which owns Discovery Channel, Animal Planet and other cable properties, filed a patent for the device in February; but the Sun notes that the patent filing was not made public until last Thursday.

The story reports that “diagrams included with Discovery’s patent application…depict a rectangular device with physical controls for user navigation.” The device would be for reading e-books and “providing for e-commerce.” As the Sun notes, Discovery already holds a patent on some security and copy protection features, and earlier this year sued Amazon.com (AMZN) for alleged infringement by the Kindle.

Read the rest of this post on the original site

Responding to complaints, the company said today that the upcoming Service Pack 1 update for Windows Vista will remove “Reduced Functionality Mode” from the OS’s copy-protection scheme.

That’s great news for innocent Vista users who’ve had their systems “reduced” for no good reason, although to be frank some users may find the nagware service with which it’s being replaced equally annoying. “Although our overall strategy remains the same, with SP1 we’re adjusting the customer experience that differentiates genuine from nongenuine systems in Windows Vista and later in Windows Server,” Windows product marketing Mike Sievert explained. “Users whose systems are identified as counterfeit will be presented with clear and recurring notices about the status of their system and how to get genuine. They won’t lose access to functionality or features, but it will be very clear to them that their copy of Windows Vista is not genuine and they need to take action.”

Recurring notices, huh? My God … they’ve finally found a new use for Clippy, haven’t they?

Responding to complaints, the company said today that the upcoming Service Pack 1 update for Windows Vista will remove “Reduced Functionality Mode” from the OS’s copy-protection scheme.

That’s great news for innocent Vista users who’ve had their systems “reduced” for no good reason, although to be frank some users may find the nagware service with which it’s being replaced equally annoying. “Although our overall strategy remains the same, with SP1 we’re adjusting the customer experience that differentiates genuine from nongenuine systems in Windows Vista and later in Windows Server,” Windows product marketing Mike Sievert explained. “Users whose systems are identified as counterfeit will be presented with clear and recurring notices about the status of their system and how to get genuine. They won’t lose access to functionality or features, but it will be very clear to them that their copy of Windows Vista is not genuine and they need to take action.”

Recurring notices, huh? My God … they’ve finally found a new use for Clippy, haven’t they?