<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Corel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/corel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Corel: Solid Q2; No Update on Vector Bid; Piper Upgrades</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080703/corel-solid-q2-no-update-on-vector-bid-piper-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080703/corel-solid-q2-no-update-on-vector-bid-piper-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-GAAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=1850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corel (CREL) shares are rallying today after the company reported solid results for its fiscal second quarter ended May 31.
For the quarter, the company posted revenue of $67.0 million and non-GAAP EPS of 36 cents; the Street had expected $66.85 million and 35 cents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corel (CREL) shares are rallying today after the company reported solid results for its fiscal second quarter ended May 31.</p>
<p>For the quarter, the company posted revenue of $67.0 million and non-GAAP EPS of 36 cents; the Street had expected $66.85 million and 35 cents.</p>
<p>For Q3, the company sees revenue of $63 million to $65 million, with non-GAAP profits of 30-36 cents a share; the Street had been expecting $63 million and 32 cents. For the full year ending in November, the company sees revenue of $263 million to $275 million, with profits of $1.50 to $1.70; the Street consensus has been $269.1 million and $1.54.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/07/03/corel-solid-q2-no-update-on-vector-bid-piper-upgrades/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080703/corel-solid-q2-no-update-on-vector-bid-piper-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding a Photo-Organizing Program</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20060302/photo-organizing/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20060302/photo-organizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mossberg's Mailbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACDSee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antispyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EasyShare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jpg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spy Sweeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mailbox.allthingsd.com/20060302/finding-a-photo-organizing-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week Walt Mossberg answers questions about switching between software provided by camera companies, Web-based tax-preparation software and scheduling antispyware sweeps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no other major item most of us own that is as confusing, unpredictable and unreliable as our personal computers. Everybody has questions about them, and we aim to help.</p>
<p>Here are a few questions about computers I&#8217;ve received recently from people like you, and my answers. I have edited and restated the questions a bit, for readability. This week my mailbox contained questions about switching between software provided by camera companies, Web-based tax-preparation software and scheduling antispyware sweeps.</p>
<p>If you have a question, send it to me at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>, and I may select it to be answered here in Mossberg&#8217;s Mailbox.</p>
<hr />
<p class="question"> <em>I have been using Olympus digital cameras for years, so I have a library of Olympus digital photos using Olympus software. If I were to switch to a Canon camera, how easy is it to also switch software? Is there an easy way to transfer the Olympus photos into the Canon software?</em></p>
<p class="answer"> Unless you are doing something unusual, all your photos from both cameras should be in the standard format called &#8220;jpg&#8221; and I assume either company&#8217;s software can handle all of them. However, I don&#8217;t recommend using the software supplied by camera makers. They may be fine at making cameras, but, with the exception of Kodak, they usually create lousy software. Instead, I suggest getting a good, general photo-organizing program, and making that the center for managing your pictures &#8212; whatever camera you use.</p>
<p>Every Macintosh computer comes with a superb program called iPhoto for organizing, sharing and editing photos. Windows computers don&#8217;t come with anything as good, but you can download a free program called Picasa from Google, at <a href="http://picasa.com" rel="external">picasa.com</a>. Or, you can download Kodak&#8217;s very nice EasyShare software, at <a href="http://Kodak.com" rel="external">Kodak.com</a>. It&#8217;s free, comes in versions for both Windows and Mac, and doesn&#8217;t require a Kodak camera or printer to use. Paid software that also does the trick on Windows includes ACDSee, at <a href="http://acdsystems.com" rel="external">acdsystems.com</a>; and Corel Photo Album, at <a href="http://corel.com" rel="external">corel.com</a>.</p>
<p class="question"> <em>In 2002, you advised against using Web-based tax-preparation software, writing, &#8220;Your tax data are highly sensitive and confidential, and I think the Web is just too susceptible to hackers and crooks to make it a fitting repository for such information.&#8221; Do you continue to have these concerns?</em></p>
<p class="answer"> Yes. If anything, the incidence of identity theft and other security problems on the Web have grown worse since 2002. I am not criticizing the tax-preparation companies, which I assume have good security. And I am not advising people against normal e-commerce, or the use of credit cards online. But I would be personally loath to put the broad and deep financial information required for a tax filing on a server controlled by someone else and connected to the Internet. I would instead download or buy traditional tax-preparation software, which keeps your data on your own hard disk.</p>
<p class="question"> <em>I have the Spy Sweeper antispyware software that you recommend, and am wondering how often you suggest scheduling it to automatically scan my computer for software. I was thinking once a month.</em></p>
<p class="answer"> Once a month isn&#8217;t good enough if you are an active Internet user, or your computer is on a broadband connection and stays on, and connected, all the time. I run both spyware and virus scans nightly on my Windows computers, and I advise all Windows broadband users to do so. There&#8217;s no downside, if your computer is on all the time anyway. I also advise setting the software to run in the background, guarding your PC against new intrusions.</p>
<p><strong>Write to</strong> Walter S. Mossberg at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a></p>
<p><inset style="OUTSET"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20060302/photo-organizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

