<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Delaware Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/delaware-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Mark Hurd Appeals Order to Release the Fisher Letter</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110405/mark-hurd-appeals-order-to-release-the-fisher-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110405/mark-hurd-appeals-order-to-release-the-fisher-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik Hesseldahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arik Hesseldahl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Chancery Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jodie Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Hurd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NewEnterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsbyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/?p=4731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle President Mark Hurd has appealed a ruling by a judge in Delaware ordering the public release of a redacted version of the letter that brought an end to his tenure as CEO of Hewlett-Packard, according to Bloomberg News. On March 17, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Donald Parsons Jr. ordered HP to release the letter as part of an ongoing shareholder suit against that company. Hurd's lawyers have appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court. Hurd has argued that the letter, which contains contractor Jodie Fisher's allegations of sexual harassment, is personal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle President Mark Hurd has appealed a ruling by a judge in Delaware ordering the public release of a redacted version of the letter that brought an end to his tenure as CEO of Hewlett-Packard, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-05/mark-hurd-appeals-hewlett-packard-letter-release-to-delaware-supreme-court.html">according to Bloomberg News</a>. On March 17, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Donald Parsons Jr. <a href="http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/20110318/judge-orders-hewlett-packard-to-release-letter-that-started-the-hurd-affair/">ordered HP to release the letter</a> as part of an ongoing shareholder suit against that company. Hurd&#8217;s lawyers have appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court. Hurd has argued that the letter, which contains contractor Jodie Fisher&#8217;s allegations of sexual harassment, is personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110405/mark-hurd-appeals-order-to-release-the-fisher-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNET and Jana: The Battle Drags On</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080514/cnet-and-jana-the-battle-drags-on/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080514/cnet-and-jana-the-battle-drags-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Interactive Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Icahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jana Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandell Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spark Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Velocity Interactive Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080514/cnet-and-jana-the-battle-drags-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another micro-move in the fight between activist shareholders and CNET, the Delaware Supreme Court given the thumbs up to a lower court ruling that the Jana Partners group can nominate a slate of directors to the board of San Francisco-based tech news and reviews site.

CNET has been fighting these efforts by Jana--along with Sandell Asset Management, Alex Interactive Media, Spark Capital and Velocity Interactive Group--to nominate two director and expand the board and add more of their own nominees--claiming it was contrary to its bylaw.

Apparently not!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/03/redball.gif' alt='cnet' class='alignleft' /></p>
<p>In another micro-move in the fight between activist shareholders and CNET, the Delaware Supreme Court has given the thumbs-up to a lower court ruling that the Jana Partners group can nominate a slate of directors to the board of the San Francisco-based tech news and reviews site.</p>
<p>CNET (CNET) has been fighting these efforts by Jana&#8211;along with Sandell Asset Management, Alex Interactive Media, Spark Capital and Velocity Interactive Group&#8211;to nominate two directors and expand the board and add more of their own nominees&#8211;claiming it was contrary to its bylaws.</p>
<p>Apparently not!</p>
<p><span id="more-68094"></span></p>
<p>What does this mean? Of course, that&#8217;s not clear at all, since Jana cannot force other shareholders to help them get what they want.</p>
<p>In fact, some other CNET shareholders I have queried recently seem nonplussed by either side in the <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080327/cnet-in-distress/">fight over the future direction of CNET</a>.</p>
<p>But while the mano-a-mano between the pair is certainly not as fast-moving as the Yahoo-Microsoft-and-now-Carl Icahn! mess, it has had some action.</p>
<p>On April 1, for example, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080401/cnets-activist-investors-write-the-book-of-not-so-much-love/">Jana issued a testy report</a> about the company, noting:</p>
<p>&#8220;CNET&#8217;s current leadership now claims it can reverse course and begin creating shareholder value, but we believe they have offered no evidence that they can do so. Despite years of shareholder value destruction, CNET&#8217;s leadership during this time failed to act on the urgent need to make fundamental strategic and operational change, instead pursuing a failed expansion strategy even as CNET fell further behind. CNET&#8217;s leadership did not even start examining the basics of improving performance until we called for change, both publicly and directly with CNET&#8217;s Board of Directors.&#8221;</p>
<p>CNET, natch, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080402/cnets-response-to-jana-thanks-but-no-thanks-you-fibber/">disagreed</a>: &#8220;CNET Networks added that while it welcomes the views of its stockholders, after a preliminary review, the white paper contains numerous misstatements and is misleading in many respects. The Company will respond in due course.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, BoomTown is poised to head over to CNET&#8217;s Second Street HQ to video-query CEO Neil Ashe tout de suite.</p>
<p>Neil, we&#8217;re waiting by the phone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080514/cnet-and-jana-the-battle-drags-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

