<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; document management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/document-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Xerox to Google, Yahoo: If You Need Additional Copies of the Lawsuit, You Know Whom to Ask</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100223/xerox-google-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100223/xerox-google-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allegations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill McKee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catherine Lacavera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xerox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y!Q Contextual Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=35452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Xerox is not a name that springs to mind when one thinks of search. It is, after all, a 100-year-old global document-management company best known for its office and production equipment. Odd, then, to hear that Xerox has accused Google and Yahoo of pilfering its intellectual property.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/xerox-printer.jpg" alt="" title="xerox-printer" width="350" height="227" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-35453" />Xerox is not a name that springs to mind when one thinks of search. It is, after all, a 100-year-old global document-management company best known for its office and production equipment. Odd, then, to hear that Xerox has accused Google and Yahoo of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-23/google-yahoo-sued-by-xerox-over-search-query-patents-correct-.html">pilfering intellectual property</a>.</p>
<p>In lawsuits filed last week, Xerox (XRX) alleges that Google&#8217;s AdSense and AdWords and Yahoo&#8217;s Search Marketing, Publishing Network and Y!Q Contextual Search software all violate its 2001 patent for a <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;p=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;S1=6,778,979.PN.&amp;OS=pn/6,778,979&amp;RS=PN/6,778,979">&#8220;System for automatically generating queries.&#8221;</a>  </p>
<p>Xerox further claims that Google Maps, Google Video, YouTube, and Yahoo Shopping infringe on its 2004 patent, <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;d=PTXT&amp;p=1&amp;p=1&amp;S1=6,236,994.PN.&amp;OS=pn/6,236,994&amp;RS=PN/6,236,994">&#8220;Method and Apparatus for the Integration of Information and Knowledge.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>Xerox is seeking treble damages for the alleged infringements, which it claims are willful. Evidently, it attempted to negotiate licensing deals with the search companies that would have precluded legal action, but was rebuffed.</p>
<p>&#8220;We’ve been in dialogue with Google and Yahoo for some time without coming to a resolution,&#8221; company spokesperson Bill McKee told Bloomberg. &#8220;We believe we have no option but to file suit to properly protect our intellectual property.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google (GOOG) and Yahoo (YHOO), for their parts, dispute Xerox’s allegations.  &#8220;These claims are entirely without merit, and we&#8217;ll vigorously defend ourselves against them,&#8221; Catherine Lacavera, Google&#8217;s senior litigation counsel, said in an emailed statement. <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web_services/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223100352">A Yahoo representative offered a similar comment</a>: &#8220;Yahoo does not believe we infringe and plans to fight this case.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100223/xerox-google-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whoa! A Tech Acquisition!</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090123/whoa-a-tech-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090123/whoa-a-tech-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Worthen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Worthen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interwoven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market capitalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=7875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first high-profile tech acquisition in months took place Thursday, but don’t take that as a harbinger of more deals.
Autonomy, a U.K. company that makes software that businesses use to track corporate information, acquired Interwoven, a San Jose, Calif., document-management company, for $775 million in cash. Autonomy will sell some stock and tap a new line of credit in order to finance the deal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first high-profile tech acquisition in months took place Thursday, but don’t take that as a harbinger of more deals.</p>
<p>Autonomy, a U.K. company that makes software that businesses use to track corporate information, acquired Interwoven (IWOV), a San Jose, Calif., document-management company, for $775 million in cash. Autonomy will sell some stock and tap a new line of credit in order to finance the deal.</p>
<p>The tech M&#038;A world has been quiet for the last few months as companies adjust to the down economy. Many publicly traded tech companies have seen their market capitalizations cut in half over the last few months. Companies aren’t yet prepared to sell at such a discount, the conventional wisdom goes.<br />
<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/01/22/whoa-a-tech-acquisition/"><br />
Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090123/whoa-a-tech-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

