<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; dominant market position</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/dominant-market-position/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Intel, After Email Miscues, Accuses AMD of the Same</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091016/intel-after-email-miscues-accuses-amd-of-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091016/intel-after-email-miscues-accuses-amd-of-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominant market position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=16711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel has admitted to some major gaffes in handling documents in an antitrust suit filed by Advanced Micro Devices, which is moving toward a trial next March. Now the chip giant says the shoe is on AMD’s foot.

Intel this week filed a motion seeking sanctions against AMD, alleging that its smaller rival failed to adequately retain and produce documents in the case and tried to hide its lapses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel (INTC) has admitted to some major gaffes in handling documents in an antitrust suit filed by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which is moving toward a trial next March. Now the chip giant says the shoe is on AMD’s foot.</p>
<p>Intel this week filed a motion seeking sanctions against AMD, alleging that its smaller rival failed to adequately retain and produce documents in the case and tried to hide its lapses. AMD rejects the allegations, characterizing them as an attempt to create a diversion from Intel’s own document-handling miscues.</p>
<p>The two companies believe the case–which AMD filed in June 2005, alleging that Intel abused its dominant market position–will generate more documents than any piece of civil litigation in U.S. history.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/10/16/intel-after-email-miscues-accuses-amd-of-the-same/?mod=rss_WSJBlog?mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091016/intel-after-email-miscues-accuses-amd-of-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd, the Parental Controls on Sen. Kohl&#039;s Copy of IE Have Been Set to Block YahooGoogleFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominant market position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herb Kohl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a Department of Justice ruling on Google’s advertising partnership with Yahoo expected by late next week, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/yhoo.jpg" alt="" title="yhoo" width="311" height="110" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6183" />With a Department of Justice ruling on Google&#8217;s advertising partnership with Yahoo <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10057136-60.html?tag=newsFeaturedBlogArea.0">expected by late next week</a>, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it. &#8220;Recognizing the nascent and fast-changing nature of this marketplace, we encourage the Department to continue to monitor the state of competition in this industry, whatever the outcome of its current investigation,&#8221; <a href="http://kohl.senate.gov/~kohl/press/08/10/2008A02A35.html">Kohl wrote</a>. &#8220;If, over time, you determine that Google is gaining a dominant market position as a result of the Google-Yahoo agreement, then we would encourage the Justice Department to intervene to protect competition. Even should you conclude at present that this deal is not contrary to antitrust law, the Department must be sure that this deal never in the future crosses the line into an unacceptable, anti-competitive collaboration among competitors which will harm consumers and advertisers.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time Kohl has raised concerns about the long-term implications of Yahoo&#8217;s (YHOO) proposed deal with Google (GOOG). And it almost certainly won&#8217;t be the last. Back in September, he worried aloud that the partnership might reduce Yahoo to &#8220;nothing more than the newest satellite in the Google orbit.&#8221; And nothing much has changed since that time, except for Google&#8217;s increased advocacy of the deal on the new <a href="http://www.google.com/yahoogooglefacts/">&#8220;Yahoo-Google Facts&#8221;</a> site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd, the Parental Controls on Sen. Kohl's Copy of IE Have Been Set to Block YahooGoogleFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominant market position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herb Kohl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a Department of Justice ruling on Google’s advertising partnership with Yahoo expected by late next week, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/yhoo.jpg" alt="" title="yhoo" width="311" height="110" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6183" />With a Department of Justice ruling on Google&#8217;s advertising partnership with Yahoo <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10057136-60.html?tag=newsFeaturedBlogArea.0">expected by late next week</a>, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it. &#8220;Recognizing the nascent and fast-changing nature of this marketplace, we encourage the Department to continue to monitor the state of competition in this industry, whatever the outcome of its current investigation,&#8221; <a href="http://kohl.senate.gov/~kohl/press/08/10/2008A02A35.html">Kohl wrote</a>. &#8220;If, over time, you determine that Google is gaining a dominant market position as a result of the Google-Yahoo agreement, then we would encourage the Justice Department to intervene to protect competition. Even should you conclude at present that this deal is not contrary to antitrust law, the Department must be sure that this deal never in the future crosses the line into an unacceptable, anti-competitive collaboration among competitors which will harm consumers and advertisers.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time Kohl has raised concerns about the long-term implications of Yahoo&#8217;s (YHOO) proposed deal with Google (GOOG). And it almost certainly won&#8217;t be the last. Back in September, he worried aloud that the partnership might reduce Yahoo to &#8220;nothing more than the newest satellite in the Google orbit.&#8221; And nothing much has changed since that time, except for Google&#8217;s increased advocacy of the deal on the new <a href="http://www.google.com/yahoogooglefacts/">&#8220;Yahoo-Google Facts&#8221;</a> site. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

