<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; dual core</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/dual-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Aiming to Power Ever More Complex Graphics, Nvidia Plans Quad-Core Mobile Chip This Year</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110215/aiming-to-power-ever-more-powerful-graphics-nvidia-plans-quad-core-mobile-chip-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110215/aiming-to-power-ever-more-powerful-graphics-nvidia-plans-quad-core-mobile-chip-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D@CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jen Hsun Huang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kal-El]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile World Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mwc2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tegra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tegra 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/?p=4243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not content to rest on its dual-core laurels, Nvidia said it will have a chip out later this year that combines four processing cores and 12-graphics chip cores to power, among other things, video with far better than HD resolution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chipmaker Nvidia plans this year to introduce a four-core processor, code-named Project Kal-El, that should offer roughly five times the processing power of its existing Tegra chip and, what it says, has significantly more horsepower than an Intel Core 2 Duo chip.<br />
<img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2011/02/Slide2-380x285.jpg" alt="" title="Slide2" width="380" height="285" class="alignright size-Medium380 wp-image-4254" /><br />
Briefing reporters at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Nvidia said it plans to include a 12-core graphics processor along with the quad-core CPU. All that processing oomph should support &#8220;Extreme HD&#8221; graphics with a resolution of up to 2,560 by 1,600 pixels. The chip is now sampling to customers, Nvidia said. </p>
<p>The company has more ambitious goals for subsequent years, with  plans to more than double performance in each of the next three years with chips code-named Wayne, Logan and Stark.</p>
<p>Nvidia&#8217;s current Tegra 2 chip is at the heart of many Android phones and a number of Android Honeycomb tablets, including the <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110105/tablets-flying-fast-and-furious-at-ces/">Motorola Xoom, LG G-Slate</a> and the <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110213/samsung-does-only-the-expected-introduces-galaxy-s-galaxy-tab-sequels-video/">just-introduced Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1</a>.</p>
<p>However, Nvidia isn&#8217;t the only company ramping things up. Qualcomm <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110213/qualcomm-aims-to-heat-up-phone-chip-race-with-dual-core-quad-core-chips/">announced a new series of ARM-based chips on Monday</a>, though its quad-core chip isn&#8217;t slated to arrive until 2012.</p>
<p>For more on Nvidia&#8217;s plans for the future, check out the <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20110121/full-dces-interview-video-nvidias-jen-hsuan-huang/">onstage interview</a> I did with CEO Jen-Hsun Huang at our <strong>D@CES</strong> event in January.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=FD1E8947-EA4A-470F-9992-3BC507A88C76&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={FD1E8947-EA4A-470F-9992-3BC507A88C76}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110215/aiming-to-power-ever-more-powerful-graphics-nvidia-plans-quad-core-mobile-chip-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm Aims to Heat Up Phone Chip Race with Dual-Core, Quad-Core Chips</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110213/qualcomm-aims-to-heat-up-phone-chip-race-with-dual-core-quad-core-chips/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110213/qualcomm-aims-to-heat-up-phone-chip-race-with-dual-core-quad-core-chips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile World Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mwc2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raj Talluri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/?p=4021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qualcomm is announcing a new series of chips including dual-core processors this year, with plans for a quad-core chip that will begin sampling next year. Although the company was a little late with dual-core chips, it sees an opening with the new processors, as well as by recent moves by Nokia and Microsoft.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Nvidia scored a lot of tablet and smartphone design wins at January&#8217;s Consumer Electronics Show, Qualcomm is hoping to get back into the act, announcing a new series of single-core and dual-core processors with plans to move to a quad-core chip by next year.</p>
<p><img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2011/02/Screen-shot-2011-02-13-at-8.57.25-PM-150x66.png" alt="" title="Screen shot 2011-02-13 at 8.57.25 PM" width="150" height="66" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-4027" /></p>
<p>The new Snapdragon processors feature the company&#8217;s Krait chip design aimed specifically at mobile phones and tablets. The company said that the new chips offer up to 12 times as much performance as the original Snapdragon processors and, because they use a new, thinner generation of wiring, can use as little as a quarter as much power as the originals.</p>
<p>&#8220;We’ve really taken performance to the next level,” Qualcomm Vice President Raj Talluri said in an interview at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, where the chipmaker is announcing the new processors. Talluri said the chips will be particularly useful in gaming and <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20101231/qualcomm-shows-why-augmented-reality-on-the-phone-is-really-nifty-video/">augmented-reality applications</a> and also support things such as recording 3-D video and playing back 3-D videos, without the need for glasses.</p>
<p>Talluri acknowledged that Qualcomm lost some ground in being later than Nvidia to move to dual-core chips, but said that the company expects 10 tablets using its processors to hit the market this year. HP plans to <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20110209/what-to-expect-at-todays-hp-webos-event/">use a dual-core Qualcomm processor in its new webOS tablet</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;They got a couple,&#8221; Talluri said. &#8220;You’ll see a lot more from us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Qualcomm also benefits from two other industry moves&#8211;Nokia&#8217;s move to adopt Windows Phone 7 and Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20101221/microsoft-plans-to-talk-windows-on-arm-at-ces-but-products-a-ways-off/">decision to enable full-blown Windows to run on ARM-based processors</a> such as Snapdragon.</p>
<p>The Nokia move is noteworthy because Qualcomm has been at the heart of nearly all of the Windows Phone 7 designs thus far, giving it a huge opening to land Nokia&#8211;a company that thus far has not used much in the way of chips from Qualcomm.</p>
<p>&#8220;This one really provides a great opportunity for us,&#8221; Talluri said. &#8220;We can provide them a really quick time to market.&#8221;</p>
<p>As for the <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110105/windows-on-arm-been-in-works-since-before-windows-7s-release/">move to bring Windows to ARM-based chips</a>, Talluri said that opens the door for Qualcomm to power whole new types of devices beyond phones and tablets.</p>
<p>&#8220;It extends our reach higher than phones,&#8221; he said. But, as with phones, Qualcomm will find plenty of competition as Nvidia and TI are also eager to give Intel a run for its money in the PC market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110213/qualcomm-aims-to-heat-up-phone-chip-race-with-dual-core-quad-core-chips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tablets Flying Fast and Furious at CES</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110105/tablets-flying-fast-and-furious-at-ces/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110105/tablets-flying-fast-and-furious-at-ces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aspect ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atrix 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2011 Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLIQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cliq 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid Bionic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingerprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G-Slate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Tab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honeycomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motoblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Jha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/?p=1844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year's Consumer Electronics Show figured to be the year of the tablet, and so far it hasn't disappointed. Motorola, Samsung and LG all announced new slates on Thursday, adding to a growing list of aspiring iPad rivals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year&#8217;s <a href="http://allthingsd.com/d/ces-2011/">Consumer Electronics Show</a> figured to be the <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110104/making-sense-of-all-the-tablet-announcements-coming-at-ces/">year of the tablet</a>, and so far it hasn&#8217;t disappointed on that front.<br />
<a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110105/tablets-flying-fast-and-furious-at-ces/xoom/" rel="attachment wp-att-1863"><img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/xoom-380x147.png" alt="" title="xoom" width="380" height="147" class="alignnone size-Medium380 wp-image-1863" /></a><br />
On Wednesday, Motorola formally announced its Android 3.0-based Xoom tablet, while LG announced plans for the T-Mobile G-Slate, which will also run the Honeycomb version of Google&#8217;s Android operating system. Samsung, meanwhile, said it plans to add a Wi-Fi-only model to its Galaxy Tab model. The device will use version 2.2 of Android and hit the market in the first quarter, though the company did not announce a price or exact timing.</p>
<p>The Motorola Xoom packs a 16-by-10 aspect ratio, a dual-core processor, 1080p playback and Flash support, and will run on Verizon&#8217;s network. Initially, the tablet will run on Verizon&#8217;s 3G network, but Motorola Mobility CEO Sanjay Jha said the Xoom that goes on sale in the first quarter of this year will be upgradeable to 4G by the end of the second quarter.</p>
<p>&#8220;The software is not completely done,&#8221; Jha said, adding that the hardware isn&#8217;t either. </p>
<p>Google Android boss Andy Rubin had briefly showed a prototype Motorola tablet at last month&#8217;s <strong>D: Dive Into Mobile</strong> conference and said that<a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20101207/backstage-at-d-mobile-googles-andy-rubin-talks-tablet-music/?mod=ATD_search"> Honeycomb was being designed expressly</a> with tablets in mind.</p>
<p>The Xoom, Wi-Fi Samsung Tab and G-Slate are in addition to the Toshiba, Asus and <a href="http://voices.allthingsd.com/20110103/vizio-extends-battle-plan/?mod=ATD_search">Vizio</a> tablets announced earlier in the week.</p>
<p>Nearly all of these tablets are running some flavor of Android, though a handful of Windows 7 tablets are also being shown in Las Vegas.</p>
<p>However, the scene in Vegas offers a somewhat skewed view of the tablet market. Outside Sin City, the iPad is still the dominant player, while a number of tablet competitors expected soon have opted not to launch here. HP is having an event next month to focus on future webOS devices, while Research In Motion has said it will launch its PlayBook before the end of March.</p>
<p>Motorola also used some of its afternoon event to show off the Motorola Atrix 4G, a smartphone <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110105/att-and-friends-talk-up-4g-network-new-devices/?mod=ATD_search">introduced at an AT&#038;T event earlier in the day</a>. It packs a fingerprint reader, a dual-core 1GHz processor, and the ability to dock to an 11-inch screen and keyboard to act as a mini-laptop, with eight hours of battery life.</p>
<p>When docked, the phone can power a full desktop version of Mozilla, including full Flash support, allowing for a PC-like experience all powered by the smartphone. AT&#038;T Senior Vice President Jeff Bradley said it is too soon to say how much the device will cost, but promised the price will be competitive. Although AT&#038;T has the U.S. exclusive on the Atrix, Motorola said it will be offered through Bell Canada and Orange UK.</p>
<p>In addition to the Atrix and Tablet, Motorola announced its first phone to run on faster LTE networks&#8211;the dual-core Droid Bionic, which is slated to arrive early in the second quarter on Verizon Wireless. Motorola also introduced the Cliq 2, an update to Motorola&#8217;s first Motoblur phone for T-Mobile.</p>
<p><strong>Update 5:45 pm PT:</strong> As for timing, I confirmed that the Motorola Xoom is indeed the &#8220;lead device&#8221; for Honeycomb and will be the first on the market when it ships later this quarter. The LG model is slated to ship &#8220;in the coming months,&#8221; and other Honeycomb tablets will follow.</p>
<p>Google isn&#8217;t sharing a lot of new details on Honeycomb, but Rubin did make a <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2011/01/sneak-peak-of-android-30-honeycomb.html">short blog post</a> and upload this YouTube video, which touts Google Talk video chatting, a specially designed YouTube App and access to Google Books.</p>
<p>&#8220;Many of Android’s existing features will really shine on Honeycomb: refined multi-tasking, elegant notifications, access to over 100,000 apps on Android Market, home screen customization with a new 3D experience and redesigned widgets that are richer and more interactive,&#8221; Rubin said in the blog post. &#8220;We&#8217;ve also made some powerful upgrades to the web browser, including tabbed browsing, form auto-fill, syncing with your Google Chrome bookmarks, and incognito mode for private browsing.&#8221;</p>
<p>.</p>
<p><object width="380" height="228"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hPUGNCIozp0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hPUGNCIozp0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="380" height="228"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110105/tablets-flying-fast-and-furious-at-ces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T and Friends Talk Up 4G Network, New Devices</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110105/att-and-friends-talk-up-4g-network-new-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110105/att-and-friends-talk-up-4g-network-new-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CES 2011 Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTCSense.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lap dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost-and-found]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Chou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph de la Vega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanjay Jha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Phone 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/?p=1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T showed off a bunch of new devices on Wednesday, including a Motorola smartphone that can plug into a screen and keyboard and transform into a thin and light laptop-like device. AT&#038;T also plans to accelerate development of a next-generation network.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&#038;T said on Wednesday that it plans to speed up development of its next-generation cellular network, completing the LTE network by the end of 2013.</p>
<p><img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/ralph_delavega.jpg" alt="" title="ralph_delavega" width="120" height="160" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1799" />Speaking at the Consumer Electronics Show, AT&#038;T executive Ralph de la Vega said that the company plans to release 20 4G devices this year both for the LTE network and for its current HSPA+ network. </p>
<p>De La Vega said just after that that the company will have devices on the Apple, Android, BlackBerry and Windows Phone 7 operating systems. (Update: 12:12 p.m.: While some in the audience, including Mobilized, heard an implication that there would be a 4G iPhone, an AT&#038;T representative said De La Vega was only saying that the iPhone would be part of AT&#038;T&#8217;s smartphone lineup and not suggesting a 4G version.)</p>
<p><a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20110105/att-and-friends-talk-up-4g-network-new-devices/attces/" rel="attachment wp-att-1820"><img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/attces-275x275.jpg" alt="" title="attces" width="275" height="275" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1820" /></a>Among the devices that will be on AT&#038;T&#8217;s HSPA+ network is the Motorola Atrix 4G, a dual-core-powered Android phone from Motorola. The phone, which also packs 1GB of RAM, was launched by Sanjay Jha, CEO of newly split-off Motorola Mobility. one of the more interesting features is the phone&#8217;s optional &#8220;lap dock,&#8221; which allows the phone to power a small laptop capable of running a desktop version of the Firefox browser, among other programs.</p>
<p>AT&#038;T will also have a new phone from HTC that will include a new version of the company&#8217;s Sense user interface and also connect to a new HTCSense.com Web portal.</p>
<p>&#8220;HTCSense.com makes your smartphone even smarter,&#8221; HTC CEO Peter Chou said, demonstrating a feature that lets you ring your phone when it is lost in the house or send a lost-and-found message to appear on a phone you left in a cab.</p>
<p>By building both HSPA+ and LTE networks, De la Vega said that the company will offer more speed and flexibility.</p>
<p>&#8220;More importantly, we will deliver an experience our competitors will not be able to match,&#8221; De la Vega said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110105/att-and-friends-talk-up-4g-network-new-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyst: Flash Could Be Hogging PlayBook Battery Life</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110104/analyst-flash-could-be-hogging-playbook-battery-life/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110104/analyst-flash-could-be-hogging-playbook-battery-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Tab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Balsillie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaufman Bros.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw Wu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=55011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite Research in Motion’s best efforts to silence them, questions about the battery life of its forthcoming PlayBook tablet have followed the company into the new year. In a sequel to his original research note suggesting the PlayBook’s battery life is “relatively poor” compared to rivals', Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu reiterates that claim, saying he would be “very surprised if PlayBook matches anywhere near the battery life of the iPad."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/playbook-flashhog.jpg" alt="" title="playbook-flashhog" width="380" height="256" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-55028" />Despite Research in Motion’s <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20101230/rim-playbook-battery-life-will-be-comparable/">best efforts to silence them</a>, questions about the battery life of its forthcoming PlayBook tablet have followed the company into the new year.</p>
<p>In a sequel to <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20101228/blackberry-playbook-car-battery-not-included/">his original research note</a> suggesting the PlayBook’s battery life is “relatively poor” compared to rivals&#8217;, Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu reiterates that claim, saying he would be &#8220;very surprised if PlayBook matches anywhere near the battery life of the iPad at 10 hours unless it uses a larger battery.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The reasons for this are threefold:</p>
<ol>
<li>The PlayBook supports Flash, and Flash is a resource hog. Says Wu, &#8220;As seen in recent tests for the new MacBook Air, use of Flash can cut battery life in half&#8230;.From our understanding, the poor battery life of early PlayBook units may be due to its incorporation of Adobe Flash.&#8221;</li>
<li>QNX, the operating system on which PlayBook is to run, wasn&#8217;t designed for it. It was intended for devices drawing power from a wall socket or car battery, not mobile platforms whose power sources are necessarily limited by their own mobility. </li>
<li>RIM&#8217;s implementation of power management is not as well-integrated as that of its rivals&#8211;particularly Apple, whose homegrown A4 system-on-chip enables the company to deliver superior battery life.</li>
</ol>
<p>Obviously further work is needed to optimize the device&#8217;s battery life; RIM admitted as much in <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20101230/rim-playbook-battery-life-will-be-comparable/">its rebuttal to Wu&#8217;s first note</a> and, to be fair, this is a pre-release device&#8211;a work in progress. RIM still has a few months left to optimize the PlayBook&#8217;s battery and get it to that &#8220;comparable&#8221; level it claims.</p>
<p>But even fully optimized, Wu doesn&#8217;t see it matching the iPad.</p>
<p> &#8220;Our sources indicate that the best that PlayBook can probably deliver is six hours as offered by the Samsung Galaxy Tab, which is nearly half of that offered by iPad,&#8221; he concludes. &#8220;And that is with significant re-engineering.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110104/analyst-flash-could-be-hogging-playbook-battery-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIM: PlayBook Battery Life Will Be "Comparable," Not Crappy</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101230/rim-playbook-battery-life-will-be-comparable/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101230/rim-playbook-battery-life-will-be-comparable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Balsillie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaufman Bros.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw Wu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=54849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research in Motion’s BlackBerry PlayBook does not suffer from poor battery life. Or, rather, if it does now it won’t when it finally ships.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/12/playbook-carbat.jpg"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/12/playbook-carbat.jpg" alt="" title="playbook-carbat" width="380" height="203" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-54855" /></a>Research in Motion’s BlackBerry PlayBook does not suffer from poor battery life. Or, rather, if it does now it won&#8217;t when it finally ships. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s RIM&#8217;s rebuttal to Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu&#8217;s suggestion that <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20101228/blackberry-playbook-car-battery-not-included/">the PlayBook&#8217;s battery life is &#8220;relatively poor&#8221; compared to rivals</a>&#8211;a claim the company says is based on the observation of a pre-beta version of the device.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any testing of battery life to date by anyone outside of RIM would have been performed using pre-beta units that were built without power management implemented,&#8221; RIM said in a statement. &#8220;RIM is on track with its schedule to optimize the BlackBerry PlayBook&#8217;s battery life and looks forward to providing customers with a professional grade tablet that offers superior performance with comparable battery life.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, but comparable to what?  And speaking of &#8220;comparable,&#8221; what happened to &#8220;way ahead&#8221;? Wasn&#8217;t that what  RIM co-CEO Jim Balsillie said of the PlayBook&#8217;s performance during the company&#8217;s last earnings call? &#8220;I think there&#8217;s going to be a rapid desire for high performance. And I think we&#8217;re way ahead on that. And I think CIO friendliness, we&#8217;re way ahead on that.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what does RIM have to say about Wu&#8217;s suggestion that it may be forced to delay the PlayBook&#8217;s launch to optimize its battery life? Nothing beyond the oblique assertion that it&#8217;s on track with an undisclosed internal schedule. Question is, is that schedule still based on an early 2011 launch or one in the May quarter as Wu suggested. Because if it&#8217;s the latter, that means the PlayBook could <em>conceivably</em> arrive at market after the next-generation iPad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101230/rim-playbook-battery-life-will-be-comparable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry PlayBook: Car Battery Not Included [UPDATED]</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101228/blackberry-playbook-car-battery-not-included/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101228/blackberry-playbook-car-battery-not-included/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaufman Bros.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QNX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shaw Wu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=54714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Research in Motion's BlackBerry PlayBook is to succeed at market the way the company hopes, there are a few engineering hurdles to overcome. The most significant, according to Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu, is the pre-release device's relatively poor battery life. Sources tell him the tablet currently lasts just a few hours per charge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/09/playbookthumb.jpg" alt="" title="playbookthumb" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-49451" />If Research in Motion&#8217;s BlackBerry PlayBook is to succeed at market the way the company hopes, there are a few engineering hurdles to overcome. The most significant, according to Kaufman Bros. analyst Shaw Wu, is the pre-release device&#8217;s relatively poor battery life.</p>
<p>Sources tell him the tablet currently lasts just a few hours per charge, compared with rivals like Samsung&#8217;s Galaxy Tab, which lasts about six, and the iPad, which lasts upward of 10. If true, that&#8217;s an untenable situation for RIM, which really needs to hit the mark with the PlayBook, and it may cause a delay of the launch&#8211;if only for a bit (to be fair, Wu is talking about an unreleased device that&#8217;s still in development and months away from market).</p>
<p>&#8220;From our understanding, this [is] likely why RIMM pushed out its launch to the May 2011 quarter,&#8221; Wu writes. &#8220;Keep in mind that QNX (the OS on which PlayBook runs) wasn&#8217;t originally designed for mobile environments but rather for devices like network equipment and automobiles where battery life isn&#8217;t as much a constraint.&#8221; </p>
<p>In other words, as promising as plugging QNX into a tablet form factor with a dual-core processor and a gig of RAM sounds, it&#8217;s proving to be a bit of a challenge. So what&#8217;s the solution? Most likely a bigger battery. But obviously that will add to the heft of the device and perhaps require a design concession or two.</p>
<p>Given that, Wu takes a conservative view of PlayBook&#8217;s prospects; he figures RIM will sell 700,000 units in 2011, far less than the one million to eight million that other analysts have been calling for. “As we have said before, we are not convinced that tablets outside of the iPad will see high volume success,” he concludes.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> RIM finally got back to me with a comment: &#8220;Any testing or observation of battery life to date by anyone outside of RIM would have been performed using pre-beta units that were built without power management implemented. RIM is on track with its schedule to optimize the BlackBerry PlayBook&#8217;s battery life and looks forward to providing customers with a professional grade tablet that offers superior performance with comparable battery life.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101228/blackberry-playbook-car-battery-not-included/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Qualcomm CEO Explains What Happened to Smartbooks</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101202/qualcomm-ceo-explains-what-happened-to-smartbooks/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101202/qualcomm-ceo-explains-what-happened-to-smartbooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Churchill Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clamshell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant-on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Jacobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A year ago, Qualcomm CEO Paul Jacobs was talking a lot about smartbooks.

Today, well, not so much.

For those who have already forgotten what the smartbook even was, the idea was to have a low-cost device that looked a lot like a netbook but offered far better battery life and instant-on capabilities. Once Apple released the iPad, though, everyone started focusing on tablet devices rather than on little notebooks.

"Obviously, tablets are the flavor of the day," Jacobs said in an interview on Tuesday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago, Qualcomm CEO Paul Jacobs was <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091116/qualcomms-ceo-paul-jacobs-talks-about-smartbooks-and-more/">talking a lot about smartbooks</a>.</p>
<p>Today, <em>well</em>, not so much.</p>
<p>For those who have already forgotten what the smartbook even was, the idea was to have a low-cost device that looked a lot like a netbook, but offered far better battery life and instant-on capabilities. </p>
<p>But once Apple released the iPad, everyone started focusing on tablet devices rather than on little notebooks.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obviously, tablets are the flavor of the day,&#8221; Jacobs said in an interview on Tuesday, ahead of his <a href="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/20101130/palm-qualcomm-chiefs-weigh-wireless-future/">panel discussion at the Churchill Club</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2010/12/jacobs-200x300.jpg" alt="" title="jacobs" width="200" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-260" /></p>
<p>The good news for Qualcomm, Jacobs said, is that the tablet requirements are basically the same as those for a smartbook.</p>
<p>&#8220;We probably did ourselves a little bit of a disservice by using [the term] smartbooks because people then thought notebooks and therefore it was a clamshell form factor,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We always thought about them not in terms of form factor but in terms of what they did, meaning always on, instant on, always connected, always downloading&#8211;the tablet designs that are out are doing that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jacobs said we will probably see some devices with a physical keyboard, but said that next year we&#8217;ll continue to see far more slates than clamshells. The same, he notes, is also holding true for the phone.</p>
<p>&#8220;Keyboards on smartphones have become less and less evident for most of them,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>For its part, Qualcomm is working on making its processors faster and more power efficient. A dual-core chip, due in the first half of the year, will offer five times as much performance or provide the same oomph as the current chips while using only a quarter as much power.</p>
<p>Since Jacobs has a good view of all the various devices coming to the market, I asked him whether he thinks that a couple of years from now we will still see five or six competing smartphone operating systems.</p>
<p>&#8220;A couple years from now I think we will,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Five to 10 years from now, I think there will probably be some winners and some losers although it&#8217;s pretty hard to say who those are going to be because different companies bring different things to the table.&#8221;</p>
<p>The carriers will bring some pressure, he said, given they have to provide support and shelf space to all the different operating systems. However, he also said it&#8217;s likely that some alternate channels will emerge beyond just sales from the carriers.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s hard to put a time frame on when more consolidation will happen,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I think right now we are in a period of expansion. You are going to see more stuff….Everybody is chasing [Google] Android and Apple right now, but I think there&#8217;s room for a lot of diversity, at least in the near term.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101202/qualcomm-ceo-explains-what-happened-to-smartbooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operating Systems Offer New Choices in PC Shopping</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091028/operating-systems-offer-new-choices-in-pc-shopping/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091028/operating-systems-offer-new-choices-in-pc-shopping/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer buying guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin and light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrathin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word processing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg gives tips on purchasing laptops with the latest pre-installed operating systems in his annual fall computer-buying guide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that both Microsoft and Apple have finally shipped the new versions of their operating systems, <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20091007/a-windows-to-help-you-forget/">Windows 7</a> and <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090826/apple-changes-leopards-spots/">Snow Leopard</a>, respectively, it&#8217;s time for my annual fall computer-buying guide.</p>
<p>This guide stresses laptops, which have become the prevalent choice, but most of its specs also apply to desktops. As always, it is aimed at average consumers doing typical tasks, such as Web surfing, email, social networking, word processing, photos, video and music. It doesn&#8217;t apply to businesses, hard-core gamers or serious media producers—groups that need specialized or heftier hardware.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=6873DA0C-91C7-4E14-88BE-183C1EB6E5B4&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={6873DA0C-91C7-4E14-88BE-183C1EB6E5B4}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>Consumers shopping for new computers this fall have a wide variety of choices with the new operating systems pre-installed, making the machines faster and better. Windows PCs are no longer burdened with the disliked Vista OS.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the good news. The bad news is that the Windows hardware makers and retailers generally are trying to nudge you to spend more. They are anxious to guide consumers away from the popular, but low-profit, stripped-down netbooks to somewhat larger Windows 7 laptops from which they can make more money. This larger-size category goes by a variety of names, which can be confusing.</p>
<p><strong>Windows vs. Mac: </strong>The arrival of Windows 7 makes PCs from Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Dell (DELL) and others much better choices than their Vista-equipped predecessors were. Microsoft (MSFT) has closed most of the gap with Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) Mac OS X operating system. Also, Windows PCs are often priced hundreds of dollars lower than Macs, and offer many more choices.</p>
<p>But Apple&#8217;s hardware is stylish and sturdy, and, in my tests, Macs usually boot faster than Windows machines. Plus, Apple&#8217;s chain of retail stores offers a better buying experience and strong post-purchase support. Also, in my view, Apple&#8217;s built-in software still has the edge. Snow Leopard is fast and reliable. And it comes with a full suite of excellent built-in programs, including email, photo and video software. Microsoft has stripped Windows 7 of such programs. Some PC makers have restored some or all of these in certain models, although I consider Apple&#8217;s counterparts better. Another huge plus: The Mac isn&#8217;t susceptible to the vast majority of viruses and spyware.</p>
<p><strong>Cost: </strong>Prices on Windows PCs are creeping upward. You can buy a Windows PC for under $500, but many stores are pushing costlier models. And those $250 netbooks are much scarcer. Now, they typically run between $300 and $450. Apple has mostly stuck with its same, higher, prices, though it has boosted the specs on many models. The cheapest Mac desktop, the minimalist Mac mini, is $599. The cheapest Mac laptop, the new MacBook, is $999. The heart of Apple&#8217;s line starts at $1,199.</p>
<p><strong>New category:</strong> Windows PC makers this season are pushing a category of laptop that is meant to fit between a netbook and a full-size laptop. It goes by a variety of confusing names, such as &#8220;ultrathin&#8221; or &#8220;thin and light,&#8221; though these models are often no thinner or lighter than some laptops of the past. They typically cost between $500 and $800, and often have 13-inch  screens.</p>
<p><strong>Memory: </strong>All Macs come with at least two gigabytes of memory, which is plenty for running Snow Leopard well. Mainstream Windows PCs have at least three gigabytes. But the cheapest Windows machines sometimes come with less. I recommend at least two gigabytes.</p>
<p><strong>64-bit: </strong>PCs have long been based on something called a 32-bit architecture, but many models now use a 64-bit architecture, allowing properly written software to use more memory and run faster. If possible, buy a 64-bit computer, which is likely to dominate eventually, even though some software and add-on hardware may be incompatible at first.</p>
<p><strong>Graphics: </strong>The new operating systems allow software makers to speed up some tasks by offloading them from the main processor onto the graphics chip. So, if possible, get a &#8220;discrete&#8221; graphics processor, which has its own memory. Otherwise, find a potent &#8220;integrated&#8221; graphics chip, which shares your main memory.</p>
<p><strong>Processor: </strong>Mainstream Windows PCs sport fast, dual-core processors from Intel (INTC) or its rival, AMD (AMD). These pack the equivalent of two brains onto one chip. But many lower-price Windows PCs have slower processors, such as the Intel Atom, which are best suited for light duty. Apple models all use Intel&#8217;s dual-core processors, except for the highest-priced desktops, which come with quad-core chips.</p>
<p><strong>Hard disks:</strong> A 250-gigabyte hard disk should be the minimum on most PCs. On a netbook, look for at least a 160-gigabyte disk. Solid-state disks are faster and use less battery power, but often add hundreds of dollars to the price tag.</p>
<p><strong>Touch: </strong>Windows 7 lets you control the computer by touching the screen with your fingers, and some PC makers add their own touch-screen features. But this only works fully with newer types of touch screens, adding cost. Make sure any touch-screen model you buy has a full multitouch screen that supports all Windows 7 gestures. Apple uses the laptop touch pad, or its new mouse, as the multitouch, finger-gesture mechanism, instead of the screen. </p>
<p>As always, don&#8217;t buy more machine than you need.</p>
<p class="tagline">Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091028/operating-systems-offer-new-choices-in-pc-shopping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New iMacs May Include &quot;Bag of Hurt&quot; Option</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bag of hurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors Buyer's Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked in October 2008 why Apple wasn’t yet offering Blu-ray DVD drives as an option on machines, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the licensing issues were too complex to make doing so worthwhile. "Blu-ray is a bag of hurt," he quipped. Well, no longer. Because Apple is planning to refresh its iMac desktop computer in the next few weeks, and when it does, it may well offer a Blue-ray drive option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/augurs-150x150.jpg" alt="augurs-150x150" title="augurs-150x150" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-25516" />Asked in October 2008 why Apple wasn’t yet offering Blu-ray DVD drives as an option on machines, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the licensing issues were too complex to make doing so worthwhile. &#8220;Blu-ray is a bag of hurt,&#8221; <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081014/qotd-48/">he quipped</a>.</p>
<p>Well, no longer. Because Apple (AAPL) is planning to refresh its iMac desktop computer in the next few weeks, and when it does, it may well offer a Blue-ray drive option.</p>
<p>Sources tell AppleInsider that the new all-in-one, dual-core desktops, which are also said to feature a new, slimmer enclosure, were finalized earlier this month and are already rolling off the assembly lines of Apple’s manufacturing partners.</p>
<p>&#8220;The late 2009 iMac line should also debut several features previously unavailable to Mac buyers,&#8221; the publication notes. &#8220;People familiar with Apple&#8217;s thinking have suggested in recent months one of these moves could see the company finally embrace Blu-ray.&#8221;</p>
<p>One last point worth noting here: According to the MacRumors Buyer&#8217;s Guide, <a href="http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iMac">the iMac is due for a refresh</a>. Apple has updated it every 220 days on average since it debuted the machine in 2003. As of  today, it has been 204 days since the last update. MacRumors’s recommendation: &#8220;Buy only if you need it&#8211;Approaching the end of a cycle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New iMacs May Include "Bag of Hurt" Option</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleInsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bag of hurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacRumors Buyer's Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked in October 2008 why Apple wasn’t yet offering Blu-ray DVD drives as an option on machines, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the licensing issues were too complex to make doing so worthwhile. "Blu-ray is a bag of hurt," he quipped. Well, no longer. Because Apple is planning to refresh its iMac desktop computer in the next few weeks, and when it does, it may well offer a Blue-ray drive option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/augurs-150x150.jpg" alt="augurs-150x150" title="augurs-150x150" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-25516" />Asked in October 2008 why Apple wasn’t yet offering Blu-ray DVD drives as an option on machines, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the licensing issues were too complex to make doing so worthwhile. &#8220;Blu-ray is a bag of hurt,&#8221; <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081014/qotd-48/">he quipped</a>.</p>
<p>Well, no longer. Because Apple (AAPL) is planning to refresh its iMac desktop computer in the next few weeks, and when it does, it may well offer a Blue-ray drive option. </p>
<p>Sources tell AppleInsider that the new all-in-one, dual-core desktops, which are also said to feature a new, slimmer enclosure, were finalized earlier this month and are already rolling off the assembly lines of Apple’s manufacturing partners. </p>
<p>&#8220;The late 2009 iMac line should also debut several features previously unavailable to Mac buyers,&#8221; the publication notes. &#8220;People familiar with Apple&#8217;s thinking have suggested in recent months one of these moves could see the company finally embrace Blu-ray.&#8221;</p>
<p>One last point worth noting here: According to the MacRumors Buyer&#8217;s Guide, <a href="http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iMac">the iMac is due for a refresh</a>. Apple has updated it every 220 days on average since it debuted the machine in 2003. As of  today, it has been 204 days since the last update. MacRumors’s recommendation: &#8220;Buy only if you need it&#8211;Approaching the end of a cycle.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090925/new-imacs-may-include-%e2%80%9cbag-of-hurt%e2%80%9d-option-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Outside</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090505/intel-outside/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090505/intel-outside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip-maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Dickstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital billboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Inside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MarketWatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megahertz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance per watt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsors of Tomorrow"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Square]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Sponsors of Tomorrow” is the new “Intel Inside.” The chipmaker is gearing up to launch a massive new advertising campaign, and that slogan is to be its anchor. Its purpose: to make us all more familiar with the Intel brand--as if it wasn’t ubiquitous enough already.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/intel_ad.jpg" alt="intel_ad" title="intel_ad" width="200" height="266" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16984" />&#8220;Sponsors of Tomorrow” is the new “Intel Inside.” The chipmaker is gearing up to launch a massive new advertising campaign, and that slogan is to be its anchor. Its purpose: to make us all more familiar with the Intel brand&#8211;as if it wasn’t ubiquitous enough already. And so, beginning this week we’ll see <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/05/intel-launches-a-new-ad-campaign.html">Intel ads in a variety of media</a>&#8211;including a giant digital billboard in New York&#8217;s Times Square&#8211;touting Intel (INTC) as <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124154583558188159.html">a driving force in innovation</a>.</p>
<p>Gone are the days of the silly clock-speed race, the megahertz myth, <a href="http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/2005/08/gigahertz_oh_mo.html">“performance per watt” war</a> and <a href="http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/2005/04/amd_i_got_your_.html">the great AMD (AMD)-Intel dual-core PR shootout</a>. Now Intel wants us all to know that while it’s  still “inside” our PCs, it’s outside them in a variety of other ways as well. “Many people take for granted what we as a company helped drive,&#8221; <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Intel-ad-campaign-tout-its/story.aspx?guid=%7B8D79DB95-4C13-42DE-B282-71DBBB0894C8%7D">Intel spokesman David Dickstein told MarketWatch</a>. &#8220;We&#8217;re hoping that we&#8217;re not just known as a microprocessor company, but as a move-society-by-quantum-leaps company.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090505/intel-outside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Buyers Have to Consider System Upgrades</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090422/computer-buyers-have-to-consider-system-upgrades/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090422/computer-buyers-have-to-consider-system-upgrades/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bargain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer's guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ease of use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia 9400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starter Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090422/computer-buyers-have-to-consider-system-upgrades/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, with Microsoft and Apple set to upgrade operating systems, Walt Mossberg's spring computer buyer's guide focuses on buying a machine for the new OS you may soon want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re shopping for a computer now, there&#8217;s an added factor to consider. Later this year, both of the major computer operating systems, Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista and Apple&#8217;s Mac OS X Leopard, will be replaced with major new versions: Windows 7 and Mac OS X Snow Leopard. And that affects what PC hardware you should choose.</p>
<p>So, in this annual spring computer buyer&#8217;s guide, I&#8217;ll pay particular attention to buying a machine for the new OS you may soon want.</p>
<p>This guide covers both laptops and desktops and is aimed at average users doing typical tasks. It doesn&#8217;t apply to hard-core gamers or video, audio or photo professionals.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=63B07AE3-F461-4C83-BC01-AF0CA1BB9927&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={63B07AE3-F461-4C83-BC01-AF0CA1BB9927}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p><strong>Cost:</strong> Prices on Windows PCs have plummeted. You can buy a Windows desktop for under $300, without a monitor, and a low-end, full-size Windows laptop for around $500. If you are willing to settle for a so-called netbook &#8212; essentially just a small, cheap laptop running the aging Windows XP operating system &#8212; you can get a decent one for $350, or less. Even Apple, which has resisted this cut-rate trend, is offering modestly lower prices or higher specs for the same prices as before.</p>
<p><strong>Timing:</strong> Despite the bargains, you may want to wait to buy, if you can, until the new operating systems emerge. That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s usually easier and cheaper to buy a new machine preloaded with a new OS. You don&#8217;t have to pay extra for the new OS or hassle with performing the upgrade. Neither Microsoft (MSFT) nor Apple (AAPL) has set a date for their new OS releases, but both are likely by the holiday buying season.</p>
<p>This is especially true if you are thinking of buying a Windows Vista machine. Vista is slow and filled with annoying nag screens. Based on my tests of its prerelease, or beta, version, Windows 7 will be a huge improvement.</p>
<p><strong>Windows vs. Mac:</strong> Apple&#8217;s hardware is beautiful and durable, and its OS is faster, easier and more stable than today&#8217;s Windows. Plus, the Mac isn&#8217;t susceptible to the vast majority of malicious software. Windows 7 will narrow this gap considerably, but Snow Leopard could keep Apple ahead, depending on how it turns out.</p>
<p>But Apple computers cost more upfront. The cheapest Mac desktop, the bare-bones Mac Mini, costs $599. And the cheapest Mac laptop is $999. So, if price is your top priority, buy a Windows PC. If speed, ease of use and stability matter more, buy a Mac.</p>
<p><strong>Upgrading:</strong> Microsoft promises that upgrading a Vista machine to Windows 7 will be a straightforward process, preserving all of your files, programs and settings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a different story for Windows XP. Upgrading from that OS will be a cumbersome, multi-step process, requiring users to offload their files, wipe out the old operating system completely, and then reload the files and reinstall their programs. This is a particular problem for buyers of netbooks, nearly all of which come with XP.</p>
<p>In addition, Microsoft&#8217;s version of Windows 7 for netbooks, called the Starter Edition, is crippled. It can run only three programs at any one time, and won&#8217;t allow any customization of the desktop or the use of Windows 7&#8242;s snazzy graphical features. Microsoft says netbook owners also will be able to run the main Home version of Windows 7, at extra cost, but given the weak processors and graphics chips on netbooks, the experience may not be optimal.</p>
<p>Apple, which doesn&#8217;t make netbooks, claims Snow Leopard will be an easy upgrade on all currently available Macs.</p>
<p><strong>Memory:</strong> Neither company has released the official specs for the two new operating systems, but both are likely to require a minimum of 1 gigabyte of memory. Such specs are usually understated, so I strongly recommend 2 gigabytes, even on cheap machines.</p>
<p><strong>Graphics:</strong> In the new operating systems, adequate graphics chips will be more important than ever, because the computers will offload some tasks typically performed by the main processor onto the graphics chip. So, if possible, spring for what&#8217;s called a discrete graphics processor, which has its own memory. If you can&#8217;t afford this, look for an integrated graphics chip, which shares your main memory, that&#8217;s as powerful as possible. One example is the Nvidia 9400.</p>
<p><strong>Processor:</strong> Microsoft and Apple say current processors will work fine with the new operating systems. The best bet is a dual-core processor. Some bargain machines use an older single-core model, which is OK for light-duty use. Netbooks, and even some laptops and desktops, come with a much wimpier processor called the Intel (INTC) Atom, which struggles at some tasks.</p>
<p><strong>Touch screens:</strong> Windows 7 will include the ability to perform many multitouch gestures on the screen. But this will require a special type of touch screen, different from the ones on most tablet PCs today. A few current models, like Hewlett-Packard&#8217;s TouchSmart desktop, support this, but not many. So, if you&#8217;d like to use multitouch on Windows 7, ask to make sure your PC can handle it.</p>
<p><strong>The bottom line:</strong> Don&#8217;t buy more machine than you can afford, or need. But protect yourself by getting one that can be upgraded to the new operating systems.</p>
<p><em>Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://www.walt.allthingsd.com">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090422/computer-buyers-have-to-consider-system-upgrades/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The TouchSmart Has Improved&#8211;But Not Enough</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080626/the-touchsmart-has-improved-but-not-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080626/the-touchsmart-has-improved-but-not-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craplet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H-P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TouchSmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPS One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080626/the-touchsmart-has-improved-but-not-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard is rolling out a new TouchSmart, a desktop computer with touch-controlled software. The hardware and software are better. It's attractive, more versatile and fun to use. But the latest effort still has some problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hewlett-Packard has been on a roll in the consumer PC market lately, with a new emphasis on attractive designs and a new willingness to take risks. It has competed hard with <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=dell'>Dell </a>on price, while at the same time offering some of the style and cool features usually associated with Apple or Sony.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1628984878}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></p>
<p>About 18 months ago, the giant PC maker brought out an unusual desktop computer called the TouchSmart, a bulky model meant for kitchen counters. It was intended as a walk-up home kiosk, with large icons you could activate by merely touching them to check the weather or to consult your calendar.</p>
<p>This TouchSmart was praised for its originality, but it wasn&#8217;t as practical as promised, and wasn&#8217;t a big hit. Still, H-P is persevering with the concept. It has refined the hardware and the touch-controlled software, and has come up with a new line set to go on sale by mid-July.</p>
<p>This new TouchSmart, which comes in two models priced at $1,299 and $1,499, is a relatively slim, one-piece desktop with a large 22-inch screen. It resembles the Apple iMac or the Dell XPS One and, like the latter, runs Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista. It has a wireless keyboard and mouse, and can be used as a normal Vista computer.</p>
<p>But, like the first TouchSmart, this new model comes with H-P&#8217;s touch-controlled user interface and special programs designed to be manipulated with your fingers. For this model, H-P is de-emphasizing the idea that the machine is meant for the kitchen, but it is forging ahead strongly with the notion that touch control is the wave of the future.</p>
<p>After testing the new TouchSmart PC for a few days, my verdict is mixed. The TouchSmart software is indeed improved. It&#8217;s attractive, more versatile and more practical &#8212; and fun to use. The hardware is handsome and well-equipped. And H-P deserves credit for continuing to build software expertise in a world where makers of computers and cellphones must become as expert at software as they are at hardware. But the latest effort has some problems.</p>
<p>The TouchSmart interface is inviting. There&#8217;s a top row with huge icons, called tiles, displaying your favorite programs, and a bottom row of smaller tiles for other programs. You can scroll each row with a finger and decide which programs go in which row. You can even include in either row not only TouchSmart programs, but the regular Windows programs or Web sites that you like. When you tap on a tile that isn&#8217;t for a special TouchSmart program, the computer pops you into the regular Windows interface. To return to the TouchSmart interface, you just tap a home button below the screen.</p>
<div class="media-LEFT" style="width: 250px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AM646_pjPTEC_20080625125142.jpg" alt="photo" height="208" width="250" /><br />Hewlett-Packard&#8217;s TouchSmart</div>
<p>The TouchSmart software includes a calendar, a weather widget, a clock, music and video players, a program for composing short notes, and even a basic Web browser. All worked OK in my tests, but they&#8217;re simple and limited.</p>
<p>The computer itself is fairly powerful. Both models have dual-core processors, large hard disks, and a whopping 4 gigabytes of memory. And both run the special 64-bit version of Vista, which allows more memory usage and can be much faster than regular Vista, but only if you buy special 64-bit software programs. This machine is loaded with every conceivable port and connector, mostly hidden from view, and the high-end model even has a TV tuner.</p>
<p>But this is still a Vista computer, with all of the disadvantages that entails, especially a sluggish start-up and an annoying barrage of pop-up warnings. And the new TouchSmart is preloaded with craplets, those irritating trial programs and come-ons that you didn&#8217;t order.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a built-in Webcam that works in low light, but it&#8217;s almost impossible to tilt the computer forward to get the best shot. Plus, the TouchSmart software interface is very basic and is ragged around the edges. It isn&#8217;t a multitouch interface &#8212; like the ones on the Apple iPhone and in the next version of Windows, code-named Windows 7, that recognize a variety of gestures and perform different tasks when multiple fingers are used rather than just one. For example, you can&#8217;t rotate a photo on the TouchSmart by grabbing it with your fingers, or move back and forth through Web pages by swiping the browser with your fingers.</p>
<p>The TouchSmart software is just a thin shell plopped on top of Vista, and it crashed on me four times during the course of a few days of testing. Also, the limitations of the TouchSmart applications can be frustrating. The photo application wouldn&#8217;t let me create albums. The music application didn&#8217;t display artist names for some of my MP3 files, and the calendar application can&#8217;t display an onscreen reminder of an event if you&#8217;re working in the main Vista interface.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re intrigued by the idea of a quick and simple interface on a handsome one-piece Vista machine, the TouchSmart might make sense. But it doesn&#8217;t deliver on the full promise of touch computing.</p>
<ul>
<li>Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the new All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com" rel="external">http://walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080626/the-touchsmart-has-improved-but-not-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consider Your Needs, Then Use This Guide to Buying a Laptop</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080410/consider-your-needs-then-use-this-guide-to-buying-a-laptop/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080410/consider-your-needs-then-use-this-guide-to-buying-a-laptop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subnotebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080410/consider-your-needs-then-use-this-guide-to-buying-a-laptop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With laptops outselling desktop PCs, Walt Mossberg offers a quick guide to the key factors you should consider when buying notebook computers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years, I have focused my twice-a-year computer buyer&#8217;s guides on desktop PCs, with less-frequent columns focusing on laptops. Now that the latter are outselling the former, though, I am going to center my main buying guides on laptops. Many of the specs I recommend will also apply to desktops.</p>
<p>As always, this is a general guide aimed at mainstream, nontechnical consumers who dwell on common tasks such as email, instant messaging and surfing the Web; managing and lightly editing photos, videos and music; and using basic office applications. It is not intended for heavy gamers, video producers or corporate buyers.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1495336584}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a vast variety of laptop models, but this guide is meant to cover the most common types of laptops, those with screens from about 12 inches to 17 inches, and weights ranging from around 2.5 pounds to 7 pounds.</p>
<p>For this column, I&#8217;m not including the category of tiny machines now called netbooks, with screens under 10 inches. I am also ignoring the huge, heavy laptops with screens larger than 17 inches that are primarily aimed at gamers.</p>
<p>Even the remaining mainstream machines range wildly in price, from bargain-basement models at $350 to high-end ones that can top $3,000. In my experience, the top brands for technology and reliability are <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=AAPL'>Apple</a> and <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=0992.HK'>Lenovo</a>&#8216;s ThinkPad line, but various models from <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=sne'>Sony</a>, <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=hpq'>Hewlett-Packard</a>, <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=6502.to'>Toshiba</a> and <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=DELL'>Dell </a>are also worth investigating.</p>
<p>So, here is a quick guide to the key factors you should consider when buying a laptop.</p>
<p><strong>Size:</strong> If you are a constant traveler, think about the subnotebook models, which generally weigh 3 pounds or less. There are two types of these. The classic subnotebook has a small screen, 12 inches or less, and a cramped keyboard. This year, a new type emerged, with a full keyboard and a normal 13.3-inch screen packed into a thin, light body. There are two of these: the MacBook Air from Apple and the Lenovo ThinkPad X300. All subnotebooks are relatively costly, typically ranging from $1,500 to over $3,000.</p>
<p>If your laptop will mostly stay at home, the office, or in class, a 5-7 pound machine with a screen of either 13.3 inches or 15.4 inches is the best bet. A well-equipped model in this class is likely to run you between $800 and $1,200. Typical models in this class are the Dell Inspiron 1525, the HP dv6700 and the Apple MacBook.</p>
<p><strong>Windows vs. Mac:</strong> This is the eternal question. In my view, Apple&#8217;s Leopard operating system is faster, better and far less prone to malicious software than Microsoft&#8217;s Vista operating system. And the Mac laptops also come with better built-in software. The $1,099 MacBook is a solid, fairly priced machine, and the $1,999 MacBook Pro is even better. Both also can run Windows.</p>
<p>But Windows laptops are often less expensive, tend to have a greater variety of ports and slots, and come in more styles and sizes.</p>
<div class="media-LEFT" style="width: 245px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AP061_PTECH_20080409180420.jpg" alt="Apple's MacBook" height="172" width="245" /><br />Apple&#8217;s MacBook</div>
<p><strong>Operating system:</strong> If you are buying a Windows laptop, be aware that Vista is slower than Windows XP, in my experience, and still has compatibility issues with add-on hardware and software. If you&#8217;d prefer to stick with XP, you will find that many fewer models are available with it. And Microsoft has decreed that after June 30, mainstream, name-brand laptops will no longer come pre-equipped with XP.</p>
<p><strong>Video:</strong> I recommend getting an LED-powered screen, which is brighter and saves power. Also, if you are choosing Vista, or if you do a lot of converting video for use on portable devices, consider getting a laptop with a separate video card inside that has its own memory.</p>
<p><strong>Memory:</strong> If you&#8217;re buying an Apple laptop, two gigabytes of memory is plenty. If you&#8217;re using Vista Home Premium, I&#8217;d consider three gigabytes for best performance.</p>
<p><strong>Processor:</strong> Any dual-core processor will be fine. Don&#8217;t pay a penny extra for faster processor speed.</p>
<p><strong>Storage:</strong> In a mainstream laptop that will be your main computer, look for a 160-gigabyte hard disk or larger. A new kind of storage, called SSD, or solid state disk, is now available. But it is still way too costly for most users, and at the moment is available only in smaller capacities.</p>
<p><strong>Battery life:</strong> Many laptops today rarely spend time away from an electrical outlet. But if yours will, look for a battery life of at least three hours between charges.</p>
<p><strong>Wireless:</strong> Make sure your new laptop has the new, faster &#8220;N&#8221; version of Wi-Fi built in. Many cheaper laptops don&#8217;t. You can also get a cellphone modem built in, but they are costly and carry a monthly fee. You can always add an external cellphone modem later.</p>
<p><strong>Other features:</strong> A built-in camera and microphone can be quite useful, and so can a feature on some Windows machines that allows you to play music and videos without fully booting up the computer.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let yourself be swayed by sales pitches, or by fanaticism for or against Windows or the Mac. Think hard about how you use your computer and what your budget will allow, and stick to those priorities.</p>
<ul>
<li>Email me at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>. Find all my columns and videos online, free, at the new All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com" rel="external">http://walt.allthingsd.com</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080410/consider-your-needs-then-use-this-guide-to-buying-a-laptop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell's All-in-One PC Has the Guts, Design to Compete With iMac</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20071227/dells-all-in-one-pc-has-the-guts-design-to-compete-with-imac/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20071227/dells-all-in-one-pc-has-the-guts-design-to-compete-with-imac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craplets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gateway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reboot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPS One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20071227/dells-all-in-one-pc-has-the-guts-design-to-compete-with-imac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell's new all-in-one PC, the XPS One, is a stylish Windows Vista machine that runs well and won't cost a fortune. If it didn't have the Dell logo on it, the XPS One might be mistaken for a product of the PC industry's design leaders, Apple or Sony.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something interesting is going on at <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=DELL'>Dell</a>. The Texas personal-computer behemoth, long associated with boxy, boring machines, has started emphasizing industrial design. And the company, which in recent years seemed to care only about corporate customers, techies and hard-core gamers, appears once again interested in average, mainstream consumers who value simplicity.</p>
<p>The most tangible example of this new approach is Dell&#8217;s XPS One desktop &#8212; an elegant, handsome, cleverly designed one-piece computer. If it didn&#8217;t have the Dell logo on it, the XPS One might be mistaken for a product of the PC industry&#8217;s design leaders, Apple or Sony.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=8C15052E-7737-4155-B2F8-DC3E6324BB0E&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={8C15052E-7737-4155-B2F8-DC3E6324BB0E}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>Like Apple&#8217;s iconic iMac, the XPS One looks like it&#8217;s simply a sleek, flat-panel monitor. The guts of the computer have been stuffed into the back of the screen.</p>
<p>But this new Dell is no mere iMac clone. It makes its own style statement, even though it shares the same 20-inch widescreen display and a similar Intel dual-core processor with the base-model iMac. Where the iMac is squarish and silver, the XPS One is all black and rectangular, with speakers attached to the sides and a wide glass base. It looks more like a small TV set than a computer and, in fact, comes with a built-in TV tuner.</p>
<p>In my tests, I found the XPS One to be much better designed and equipped than Gateway&#8217;s iMac competitor, also called the One. In fact, the Dell XPS One is the first Windows all-in-one desktop I&#8217;ve tested that I believe matches or exceeds the iMac in hardware design. That&#8217;s no small feat, especially coming from Dell.</p>
<p>Unlike the Apple, for example, the Dell has a built-in slot for camera memory cards. It comes standard with a wireless keyboard and mouse, which cost extra on the iMac. Its screen can be turned off with the touch of a button without turning off the computer itself. Its USB and headphone ports are arrayed conveniently on the side, instead of mainly at the rear, as on the iMac.</p>
<p>And, when you wave your hand in front of the black border to the right of the screen on the XPS One, a set of blue, back-lit touch controls magically appear for controlling the playback of music or video. They go away after a few seconds. The Dell also comes with a free year of 10 gigabytes of online backup.</p>
<p>For my tests, I used the least expensive standard configuration of the XPS One, which can be ordered for $1,499 at <a href="http://dell.com/theonepc" rel="external">dell.com/theonepc</a>. It came with two gigabytes of memory (twice the comparable iMac&#8217;s standard amount), a 250 gigabyte hard disk and Wi-Fi wireless networking, unusual in Windows desktops.</p>
<p>The computer performed crisply and well for me. I installed several popular third-party programs that weren&#8217;t included, such as Microsoft Office, the Firefox Web browser, Apple&#8217;s iTunes and Adobe Reader. All worked fine.</p>
<p>I also successfully tested the built-in TV function, which requires a cumbersome external attachment to work with a cable box. I was able to view and record TV shows, something you can&#8217;t do out of the box on an iMac.</p>
<p>I still recommend the iMac over the XPS One for several reasons other than hardware design. First, there&#8217;s the software. I believe Apple&#8217;s operating system, Leopard, is superior to the new Windows Vista operating system, the only choice on the XPS One. In my tests, a reboot of the XPS One took more than twice as long as a reboot of the iMac.</p>
<p>And I regard Apple&#8217;s built-in software, especially the iLife multimedia suite, as superior to the Dell&#8217;s built-in software, which includes a group of Adobe multimedia programs that are less well integrated and more complex.</p>
<p>The XPS One, unlike the iMac, also came with a bunch of craplets &#8212; trial software like Yahoo Music and come-ons for online services like NetZero.</p>
<p>Second, the iMac, unlike the Dell, is immune to the vast majority of malicious software floating around, so you don&#8217;t have to run annoying, memory-hogging security programs. The first time I turned on the beautiful Dell I was met with a warning that I had &#8220;multiple security problems,&#8221; and was led to install a security suite in a complex and tedious process.</p>
<p>Third, defying popular perception, the iMac costs less than the XPS One. The base, 20-inch iMac costs $1,199 &#8212; about $300 less. And even if you double the memory, and add a wireless keyboard and mouse to match the Dell, it&#8217;s still $1,399 &#8212; $100 less than the base XPS One (though Dell is currently running a sale that wipes out the $100 gap). Even the cheapest iMac has a dedicated video card with its own memory, something the base XPS One lacks.</p>
<p>Plus, while Dell offers only 20-inch screens on the XPS One, Apple has higher-end iMacs with huge 24-inch screens for the same price, or less, than the higher-end Dells.</p>
<p>Still, if you want a stylish Windows Vista machine that runs well and won&#8217;t cost a fortune, the XPS One fits the bill, despite its unlikely heritage.</p>
<p>
<ul>
<li>Email me at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>. Find all my columns and videos online free at the new All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com" rel="external">http://walt.allthingsd.com</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20071227/dells-all-in-one-pc-has-the-guts-design-to-compete-with-imac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Basic Features You Should Demand When Buying a PC</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20071018/some-basic-features-you-should-demand-when-buying-a-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20071018/some-basic-features-you-should-demand-when-buying-a-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vostro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20071018/some-basic-features-you-should-demand-when-buying-a-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time for Walt's annual fall PC buyer's guide and, surprisingly, 10 months after Microsoft's Vista operating system emerged, Vista is still the biggest puzzle in consumers' computer-buying decisions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time for my annual fall PC buyer&#8217;s guide and, surprisingly, 10 months after Microsoft&#8217;s Vista operating system emerged, Vista is still the biggest puzzle in consumers&#8217; computer-buying decisions.</p>
<p>Back in January, when I reviewed the massive new operating system, which took more than five years to develop, I called it &#8220;unexciting&#8221; because many of the breakthrough features Microsoft had planned for it had been jettisoned, and most of the rest were already present in the rival Apple Macintosh operating system, OS X.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=15466373-23B1-43F3-8FB9-5C2154AD12D2&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={15466373-23B1-43F3-8FB9-5C2154AD12D2}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>But I also said it was &#8220;worthy,&#8221; and better than prior versions of Windows, because it has a stronger security system under the hood and better integrated searching.</p>
<p>Over the ensuing months, however, Vista has proved to be a disappointment, even though Microsoft says it&#8217;s selling like hotcakes. Based on my own experience and on reports from readers, it&#8217;s clear that many Vista PCs start up more slowly than new PCs running its predecessor, Windows XP, or than even well-worn Macs. And there is still a significant compatibility problem: Too many software and hardware products still don&#8217;t run, or don&#8217;t run properly, with Vista.</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re shopping for a new Windows computer, one of your first decisions is whether you want to get Vista, which comes on almost all new models, or to stick with Windows XP. PC makers are still offering XP on a few new consumer PCs. For instance, Dell offers four consumer laptops and two consumer desktops that can be ordered with XP.</p>
<p>Buying XP will likely result in fewer frustrations in the short run. But buying Vista may be the better choice for the long run. Over time, more and more products will be released that are tailored to the new system.</p>
<p>Your other option is to shun the Windows dilemma and buy a Macintosh. I regard the Mac operating system as superior to Windows, and Apple embeds it in beautifully designed machines. Macs have been spared the plague of viruses and spyware that afflicts Windows, and have better built-in multimedia software.</p>
<p>But, if you&#8217;re thinking of buying a Mac, it makes sense to wait a few weeks or months to gauge the early reviews and user reactions to Apple&#8217;s own new version of its operating system, called Leopard, due out Oct. 26. After that date, Apple won&#8217;t build in the current version of OS X, called Tiger, on new machines.</p>
<p>Here are some tips if you&#8217;re shopping for a new Windows PC this fall. They apply to desktop PCs and to most mainstream laptops, though there are additional considerations, such as size and weight and battery life, for smaller laptops meant primarily for travel. As always, these recommendations are intended for average consumers doing average tasks, not for heavy gamers, video professionals, or corporate buyers.</p>
<p><strong>Operating system:</strong> If you opt for Vista, the best choice for average consumers is a version called Home Premium, which includes all of the new graphics and multimedia features. Many low-end PCs have only a stripped-down version called Home Basic. Some people may need Vista Business, a version that can link to some kinds of corporate networks that the two Home varieties can&#8217;t. If your budget allows, you can get an expensive version called Ultimate that includes the features of both the Home and Business versions.</p>
<p><strong>Junk software:</strong> Most Windows consumer models are stuffed with &#8220;craplets&#8221; &#8212; crippled trial versions of programs. They take up space and can slow down the machine. One way to avoid these is to buy a so-called business PC, like one of Dell&#8217;s new Vostro models. Dell also allows you to opt out of trial software, especially when ordering its pricier XPS models. Many other manufacturers make this hard or impossible, especially if you buy a PC at a retail store. But the stores may clean up a new PC for a fee.</p>
<p><strong>Memory:</strong> Buy at least one gigabyte of memory for Home Basic and at least two gigabytes for all other Vista versions.</p>
<p><strong>Video:</strong> Vista&#8217;s flashy graphical interface works best with a separate, or &#8220;discrete,&#8221; graphics card that has its own memory. Some &#8220;integrated&#8221; graphics systems work fine, too, but they claim some of your main memory via an approach called shared memory.</p>
<p><strong>Processor:</strong> Any &#8220;dual-core&#8221; processor from Intel or AMD should be fine for Vista. Don&#8217;t worry about processor speed. Buying added memory does more for performance.</p>
<p><strong>Hard drive:</strong> Don&#8217;t scrimp on storage space, unless you are absolutely certain you won&#8217;t be saving many photos, songs or videos. Even an average PC should come with 300 gigabytes of hard-disk space for a reasonable price.</p>
<p><strong>Performance:</strong> If you&#8217;re shopping in a retail store, try to check the performance rating Microsoft builds into Vista. It&#8217;s available by clicking &#8220;Show more details&#8221; in Vista&#8217;s &#8220;Welcome Center&#8221; screen. If this rating is below 3.0 on a Home Premium model, avoid the computer. For best results, shoot for 3.5 or higher.</p>
<p><strong>Price:</strong> You can get a bargain-basement computer for under $400. But, for a versatile Vista PC with Home Premium, two gigabytes of memory, discrete video, a large hard disk and a dual-core processor, you should expect to spend $800 or more.</p>
<p><em>Email me at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>. Find all my columns and videos online free at the new All Things Digital web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com" rel="external">http://walt.allthingsd.com</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20071018/some-basic-features-you-should-demand-when-buying-a-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before Going to Buy High-Tech Devices, Learn the New Terms</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20061116/learn-new-tech-terms/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20061116/learn-new-tech-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antiblur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cingular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft N]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual boot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSDPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20061116/before-buying-high-tech-learn-the-new-terms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg offers a quick glossary of techno terms shoppers may encounter when looking for a computer, television, digital camera or cellphone this holiday season. (Video)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shopping for computers and other high-tech products has always been a challenge, partly because the manufacturers and retailers erect a tower of techno-babble terminology to confuse you into spending more money, and to make poorly trained salespeople who merely memorize jargon seem smart.</p>
<p>This year, that tower of babble is higher than ever, as new terms have come into being, and old ones have come to the fore. So, here&#8217;s a quick glossary of some of the current techno terms you may encounter when shopping for a computer, television, digital camera or cellphone this holiday season.</p>
<p><strong>Aero:</strong> This is the graphical user interface that&#8217;s a key part of Microsoft&#8217;s new Windows Vista operating system, due out around Jan. 30. If you want to get the full benefit of Vista, make sure any Windows PC you buy this season is capable of running Aero. Many are not.</p>
<p><strong>Antiblur:</strong> Also known as antishake or image stabilization, this is a crucial feature of digital cameras today. Because few cameras have optical viewfinders, users tend to hold them at arm&#8217;s length to frame the shot on the LCD screen. This increases the likelihood of shaking the camera. An anti-blur feature can correct that. The best antiblur technology is optical. Digital versions are less effective.</p>
<p><strong>Draft N:</strong> This is a new, faster, longer-range version of the popular Wi-Fi wireless networking system, and many new Wi-Fi products are built to comply with it. It succeeds the common &#8220;G&#8221; flavor of Wi-Fi. But, there&#8217;s a catch. As the name implies, this technology is based on a draft of the forthcoming new Wi-Fi standard, to be called &#8220;N.&#8221; And the final standard could be different enough to make Draft N gear outdated in 12 to 18 months.</p>
<p><strong>Dual Boot:</strong> A computer that is configured to boot, or to start up, in two different operating systems, depending on which the user chooses at any one time. The most important example of this currently is on Apple&#8217;s Macintosh computers, which now can be set up to run either the Mac operating system or Microsoft Windows using Apple&#8217;s free dual-boot software, called Boot Camp.</p>
<p><strong>Dual Core:</strong> A type of microprocessor &#8212; the brain that runs a computer &#8212; which packs the equivalent of two processors into a single chip. The best known dual-core processors in consumer computers are Intel&#8217;s Core 2 Duo and Core Duo, but rival AMD also makes them. They are a good bet for most people.</p>
<p><strong>Flash Player:</strong> A small-capacity digital music player, like Apple&#8217;s iPod Nano and Shuffle. These players use flash memory, a type of memory chip that behaves like a small hard disk to store music, photos and videos. Larger players, such as the full-size iPod and the new Microsoft Zune, use actual hard disks, like the ones in computers. Flash memory is also what&#8217;s inside the small memory cards used in digital cameras.</p>
<p><strong>HDMI:</strong> This acronym, for High-Definition Multimedia Interface, describes a new kind of cable for hooking high-definition TVs to things like cable boxes and DVD players. It provides a high-quality digital feed, and combines both audio and video signals via a single connection. When shopping for an HDTV, make sure it has HDMI connectors on the back.</p>
<p><strong>HSDPA:</strong> An awkward name for a new high-speed cellphone network being deployed in the U.S. by Cingular Wireless. Its full name is High Speed Downlink Packet Access, and it&#8217;s intended to compete with successful high-speed networks from Verizon and Sprint called EVDO, or Evolution Data Only. All of these new networks allow Internet access at about the speed of a slow home DSL line, which is a big boost for cellphones. If you care about email and Internet access on a phone, and you are using Cingular, get a phone that can handle HSDPA.</p>
<p><strong>Quad Band:</strong> A cellphone that handles all four bands, or frequencies, used in various countries by wireless phone companies adhering to a world-wide standard called GSM. Examples are Cingular and T-Mobile in the U.S., and Vodafone and Orange in Europe. A quad-band phone can be used on any GSM network anywhere, so if you travel overseas a lot, you may want one.</p>
<p><strong>RAW:</strong> A file format for digital photographs that is uncompressed and largely unmodified by the camera&#8217;s chips, and therefore includes every detail of the color and image. It is prized by professional photographers and serious amateurs, who look for cameras and photo software that can handle the RAW format. But it produces enormous files, so most users should ignore it and stick with the very good, very common compressed photo format, called JPEG or JPG.</p>
<p><strong>Shared Memory:</strong> A computer configuration in which the video circuitry lacks its own dedicated memory and must share, or drain off, a portion of the computer&#8217;s main memory. This is common in lower-price computers. It&#8217;s fine, but it reduces the amount of memory available to the nonvideo functions of the computer, so you may want to add extra memory to a PC of this type.</p>
<p><strong>WAN:</strong> Any wide-area network, such as a cellphone network, that can be used to send and receive data. It is distinguished from a LAN, or local area network, such as the wired and wireless networks deployed inside a business or home. Some computer makers use the term for the built-in cellphone modems in their laptops.</p>
<p>Good luck with your gift shopping. Don&#8217;t get trapped in the tower of babble.</p>
<p><strong>Email me</strong> at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20061116/learn-new-tech-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice on Shopping For a Windows PC -- If You Must Buy Now</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20061026/shopping-windows-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20061026/shopping-windows-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DirectX 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20061026/advice-on-shopping-for-a-windows-pc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're thinking of acquiring or giving a new Windows PC this holiday season, don't do it. Walt Mossberg suggests you wait until Vista arrives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time for my annual fall computer buyer&#8217;s guide, and this year my message is a little unusual. If you&#8217;re thinking of acquiring or giving a new Windows desktop or laptop computer this holiday season, don&#8217;t do it. I suggest that, if at all possible, you wait around 90 days and get that new Windows machine in February.</p>
<p>I advise this delay because the Windows world is on the verge of an upheaval. Microsoft is about to replace its tired, insecure Windows XP operating system with the first all-new version of Windows in more than five years. It&#8217;s called Windows Vista, and it&#8217;s likely to be more secure and easier to use. But Vista won&#8217;t be available until around Jan. 30, 2007. So, all those brand-new Windows computers you might buy this holiday season will be powered by an operating system that is on its deathbed.</p>
<p>Of course, you can upgrade most new Windows XP computers you buy now to Windows Vista after January. And starting today, Microsoft and PC makers are offering an Express Upgrade program that will provide copies of Vista for free, or at reduced prices, to people who buy Windows XP machines bearing a &#8220;Vista Capable&#8221; sticker from now through mid-March.</p>
<p>The catch is that upgrading PCs to major new operating system releases can be a tricky business. Often, it works just fine, but in many cases there are significant problems. It&#8217;s always better to buy a new PC that has been matched at the factory with the latest operating system. Waiting just another 90 days could save you a lot of upgrading aggravation.</p>
<p>Also, the free or discounted upgrade program will, in most cases, entitle users of the common Home edition of Windows XP to obtain only a stripped-down version of Vista called Home Basic. That version lacks many of the coolest features of the Vista user interface.</p>
<p>What if you want an Apple Macintosh instead? Should you wait? After all, Apple is also planning an all-new version of its operating system, to be called Leopard, in 2007. I don&#8217;t advise Mac shoppers to wait, for several reasons. First, Leopard isn&#8217;t due until spring of 2007, months after Vista. Second, Leopard won&#8217;t be as disruptive an upgrade as Vista because it is the fifth major revision of Apple&#8217;s operating system since 2001, not the first. Third, because Apple makes both the hardware and software, Mac operating system upgrades tend to be relatively easy.</p>
<p>Apple isn&#8217;t offering holiday buyers any discounts or free upgrades to Leopard, but the company says all of its Mac models currently being sold will work fine with the new system. The current Mac operating system, called Tiger, already contains most of the key features promised for Windows Vista. I still regard the Apple iMac as the best consumer desktop computer on the market.</p>
<p>But, if you want a Windows desktop or laptop and you can&#8217;t wait until February for a model that is preloaded with Vista, here are some guidelines. As always, these tips are for typical mainstream users, not hard-core gamers or people doing intensive video production.</p>
<p><strong>Vista compatibility:</strong> Make sure your new PC has a sticker that says &#8220;Vista Capable.&#8221; But this sticker guarantees that it will work with only the stripped-down Home Basic version of Vista. If you want to be able to upgrade to the Home Premium version of Vista, which has the full user interface and other features, or to several other versions of Vista, look for a computer designated &#8220;Premium Ready.&#8221; Naturally, these latter machines will cost more.</p>
<p><strong>Memory:</strong> Microsoft suggests 512 megabytes of memory, or RAM, for the stripped-down Vista Home Basic, and 1 gigabyte of memory for full Vista. But I strongly suggest doubling those amounts. If you want to run Vista with all its features, get 2 gigabytes of memory.</p>
<p><strong>Video:</strong> Vista Home Basic can run on any graphics hardware that can support a Microsoft technology called DirectX 9. This includes many &#8220;integrated&#8221; graphics systems, which don&#8217;t use a separate video card.</p>
<p>Vista Home Premium and other versions will work best with a separate, or &#8220;discrete,&#8221; graphics card that has at least 128 megabytes of dedicated video memory. Microsoft says even integrated graphics systems, like Intel&#8217;s chip sets labeled 945 or higher, will also work, as long as the computers containing them are labeled &#8220;Premium Ready.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Processor:</strong> For stripped-down Vista, a processor running at 800 megahertz or faster should be sufficient, according to Microsoft. For full Vista, the speed rises to 1 gigahertz. For anything other than stripped-down Vista, I&#8217;d strongly suggest buying a so-called dual core processor, like Intel&#8217;s Core Duo or Core 2 Duo, which pack the equivalent of two chips into one.</p>
<p><strong>Hard disk:</strong> Disk storage is already copious enough for Vista, and buying large amounts is inexpensive. For stripped-down Vista, I&#8217;d go for at least 60 gigabytes of hard-disk space. For full Vista, I&#8217;d boost that to 200 gigabytes, to accommodate lots of music and video.</p>
<p><strong>Price:</strong> Don&#8217;t spend extra for a slightly faster processor. Invest in more memory instead. And factor in the cost of Vista. Even the Express Upgrade program may pay only part of the cost of an upgrade, which ranges from $99 to $259, depending on the version of Vista you want.</p>
<p>So, wait, if you can. But, if you must buy now, don&#8217;t scrimp on the specs.</p>
<ul>
<li>Email me at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20061026/shopping-windows-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony, Lenovo Laptops Are Pricey, but Offer Lots of Features, Power</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20060420/sony-lenovo-laptops/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20060420/sony-lenovo-laptops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cingular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20060420/sony-lenovo-laptops-are-pricey-powerful/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg tests the Sony Vaio SZ160 and the Lenovo ThinkPad X60s, and says for road warriors, these small, light, well-designed laptops are worth their hefty price tags.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony and Lenovo, the Chinese company that took over IBM&#8217;s personal computer line, are rare among Windows laptop makers. In contrast to many competitors, they exhibit lots of creativity and distinctiveness in their laptop designs, much like Apple Computer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing two new small and light laptops from these companies: the Sony Vaio SZ160, and the Lenovo ThinkPad X60s. Both weigh in at under four pounds, so they won&#8217;t break your back when you tote them on the road. But each has plenty of power, decent battery life and a rich set of features. And, despite their small size, these machines are capable of serious work, partly because both use Intel&#8217;s new Dual Core processor, which packs the equivalent of two processors into one.</p>
<p>I like both machines, but they have different benefits and downsides. The ThinkPad is the latest entry in a long line of small, rugged laptops with great keyboards and strong battery life. It has a speedy, optional, internal cellphone modem for connecting to the Internet over a cellphone network. But it lacks an internal optical (CD or DVD) drive.</p>
<p>At the cost of just a little more weight and size, the Sony I tested includes an optical drive and a bigger screen, but it lacks a cellphone modem and has weaker battery life than the Lenovo configuration I tested. For enhanced security, both laptops have built-in fingerprint readers that can bolster or replace typed passwords. Neither is a bargain-basement laptop. The Sony SZ series starts at $2,000, and the ThinkPad X60 series starts at $1,900. They come in many different configurations, and thus many different prices. The ThinkPad X60s I tested, which included a cellphone modem, an extra-strength battery and a dock with an optical drive, costs $2,300. The Sony SZ I tested, which didn&#8217;t include a dock, an extended battery or a cellphone modem &#8212; but did have that internal optical drive &#8212; costs $2,500.</p>
<div class="media-LEFT" style="width: 160px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AG152_PTECHL_20060419202145.jpg" alt="lenovo thinkpad" height="195" width="160" /><br />The Lenovo ThinkPad X60s</div>
<p>The Thinkpad X60S I tested weighed 3.46 pounds, while my Sony SZ160 test model weighed just 3.72 pounds, even with the bigger screen and optical drive. The ThinkPad is 10.5 inches wide by 8.3 inches deep, and it&#8217;s between 0.8 inch and 1.11 inches thick. The Sony is 12.5 inches wide by 9.3 inches deep, and it&#8217;s between 0.9 inch and 1.3 inches thick. The Sony&#8217;s larger dimensions are mainly a result of its bigger screen &#8212; 13.3 inches, versus 12.1 inches for the Lenovo. The Sony screen is also higher resolution.</p>
<p>I put both laptops through my usual tough battery test, wherein I turn off all power-saving software, crank up the screen brightness to the max, turn on the wireless networking, and then play an endless loop of music.</p>
<p>My test ThinkPad, with its double-capacity battery, lasted a very impressive four hours and 49 minutes. In normal use, with power-saving turned on and a more typical work pattern, I&#8217;d expect it to last six hours or more, which is excellent. My test Sony, which had a normal-size battery, lasted just three hours and two minutes, even though the machine was running on its so-called Stamina setting. In normal use, the Sony would likely top four hours. Presumably, a Lenovo with a standard battery would do worse, and a Sony with an extended battery would do better.</p>
<p>Neither can match Apple when it comes to the quality of its built-in software. Lenovo&#8217;s is too geeky and is aimed more at corporate than consumer customers. Sony&#8217;s is more consumer-oriented, but it&#8217;s inconsistent and confusing.</p>
<p>The ThinkPad X60s, like its predecessors from IBM, is compact and rugged, with strong hinges and the best keyboard in any laptop. It has both built-in Wi-Fi wireless networking and a built-in cellphone modem that works on Verizon&#8217;s speedy EV-DO network.</p>
<p>My test machine worked well on all the typical computing tasks most people do, but there was one small defect in a Lenovo-supplied wireless software program that kept turning off the Wi-Fi. The company says this problem appeared only in early models like mine and has been fixed. Overall, the quality seemed as good as when IBM was making the machines.</p>
<div class="media-LEFT" style="width: 160px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AG150_PTECHS_20060419202206.jpg" alt="sony vaio" height="132" width="160" /><br />The Sony Vaio SZ160</div>
<p>But the Thinkpad X series really should have an internal optical drive by now. When it was introduced, few ultra-small laptops had them, but since then Sony and others have figured out how to install optical drives in even smaller boxes.</p>
<p>The Sony SZ series is interesting because, while it&#8217;s not Sony&#8217;s smallest or lightest line, it packs a larger screen and an optical drive into a package that&#8217;s under four pounds. Like the Lenovo, it worked well at all typical tasks.</p>
<p>The SZ&#8217;s biggest innovation is that it has two graphics systems and the aforementioned &#8220;Stamina&#8221; mode, controlled by a switch, which allows you to use the weaker graphics hardware to save battery power. Its biggest downside is that its optional cellphone modem (available this summer in a pricier premium model I didn&#8217;t test) works on Cingular&#8217;s EDGE network, which is only about a seventh as fast as the Verizon network Lenovo uses.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t go wrong with either of these well-designed laptops. For road warriors, they are worth their hefty price tags.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Email me</strong> at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20060420/sony-lenovo-laptops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

