<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; employers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/employers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Don't Ask, Don't Poke: What's Next for House Proposal to Keep Employers From Demanding Your Facebook Password</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120430/dont-ask-dont-poke-whats-next-for-house-proposal-to-keep-employers-from-demanding-your-facebook-password/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120430/dont-ask-dont-poke-whats-next-for-house-proposal-to-keep-employers-from-demanding-your-facebook-password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Isaac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eliot engel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan schakowsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the AP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=201329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your future employers could face steep fines if they ask for your Facebook password.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2012/04/facebook_finger.png" alt="" title="facebook_finger" width="380" height="284" class="alignright size-full wp-image-201613" />In late March, the Associated Press raised hackles after pointing out a disturbing new trend: Employers asking prospective new hires for their Facebook login information in order to conduct a background check. </p>
<p>After those national headlines, Capitol Hill is finally listening. Representatives Eliot Engel (D., N.Y.) and Jan Schakowsky (D., Ill.) introduced &#8220;The Social Networking Online Protection Act&#8221; to the House on Friday, a bill that would prohibit employers from asking candidates for their social networking passwords.</p>
<p>&#8220;No one would feel comfortable going to a public place and giving out their username and passwords to total strangers,&#8221; Rep. Engel said in a statement provided to <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/224305-lawmakers-push-bill-to-ban-bosses-from-asking-for-facebook-passwords">The Hill</a>. &#8220;They should not be required to do so at work, at school, or while trying to obtain work or an education.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the bill were to pass, employers or school and university admittance boards could be fined up to $10,000 for a violation. </p>
<p>The issue first exploded after <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/job-seekers-getting-asked-facebook-080920368.html">the AP</a> pointed to statistician Justin Bassett&#8217;s account of the questionable practice last month, spurring lawmakers such as Senators Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.) to call on the Justice Department for an investigation. </p>
<p>But public concern waned after <a href="http://prdaily.com/Main/Articles/Trend_of_employers_asking_for_Facebook_passwords_q_11228.aspx">AP reporter Manuel Valdes</a> admitted his evidence was mostly anecdotal and the practice &#8220;doesn&#8217;t seem to be widespread.&#8221; </p>
<p>Even if the hubbub was a bunch of sound and fury, the bill still has a long road to go before hitting President Barack Obama&#8217;s desk. There are still rounds of committee hearings, getting it through the floor of the House and the Senate and getting the two sides of the legislature to agree on a final version before sending it to the White House.</p>
<p>And none of those are easy feats.</p>
<p>Facebook isn&#8217;t commenting on this bill in particular, but it&#8217;s safe to assume the company will support its passage.</p>
<p>Soon after the AP published its initial story, Facebook made it a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-and-privacy/protecting-your-passwords-and-your-privacy/326598317390057">Terms of Service violation</a> for anyone to share or solicit Facebook passwords. And when Maryland became the first state to pass a similar bill earlier this month, <a href="http://www.wjla.com/articles/2012/04/maryland-banning-employers-requesting-facebook-passwords-75116.html">Facebook commended the legislature on the move</a>, although Governor Martin O&#8217;Malley hasn&#8217;t signed it quite yet. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no telling the exact timeline &#8212; so to speak &#8212; on moving the bill through Congress, but my guess is it won&#8217;t be speedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120430/dont-ask-dont-poke-whats-next-for-house-proposal-to-keep-employers-from-demanding-your-facebook-password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here Come Tablets. Here Come Problems.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120402/here-come-tablets-here-come-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120402/here-come-tablets-here-come-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shara Tibken</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=192409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies everywhere are adopting tablets. Forrester Research Inc. estimates that about 25 percent of computers used for work globally are tablets and smartphones, not PCs. But in the process, companies are making a lot of the same mistakes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies everywhere are adopting tablets. Forrester Research Inc. estimates that about 25 percent of computers used for work globally are tablets and smartphones, not PCs.</p>
<p>But in the process, companies are making a lot of the same mistakes &#8212; from not researching ahead of time how workers can best use the devices, to underestimating the costs and the additional challenges tablets present for IT networks.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a rundown of five of the biggest mistakes, and what companies have learned from them.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203986604577253162552946038.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120402/here-come-tablets-here-come-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When a Facebook Rant Gets You Fired</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111201/when-a-facebook-rant-gets-you-fired/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111201/when-a-facebook-rant-gets-you-fired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Trottman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanie Trottman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=149577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workers fired or disciplined for bad-mouthing employers on social-networking sites are fighting back using a decades-old labor law -- a new front in the murky battle over what workers can do and say online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workers fired or disciplined for bad-mouthing employers on social-networking sites are fighting back using a decades-old labor law &#8212; a new front in the murky battle over what workers can do and say online.</p>
<p>Since the rise of Facebook and Twitter, companies believed they had the right to fire employees who posted complaints or hostile or rude comments online about their employers.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203710704577049822809710332.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111201/when-a-facebook-rant-gets-you-fired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Crackdowns Trigger Legal Fights</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110120/social-media-crackdowns-trigger-legal-fights/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110120/social-media-crackdowns-trigger-legal-fights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanette Borzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeanette Borzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=35393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook gaffes that can cause trouble in the workplace aren't unique to drunken college students any more. As more companies--and their workers--tap into the world of blogs, Twitter and Facebook, employers are tripping over legal potholes in social media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook gaffes that can cause trouble in the workplace aren&#8217;t unique to drunken college students any more. As more companies&#8211;and their workers&#8211;tap into the world of blogs, Twitter and Facebook, employers are tripping over legal potholes in social media.</p>
<p>Next week, for example, a National Labor Relations Board judge will consider whether a medical-transportation company illegally fired a worker after she criticizing her boss on Facebook, in the federal agency&#8217;s first complaint linked to social media.<br />
In another case, workers sued a restaurant company when they were dismissed after managers accessed a private Myspace page the employees set up to chat about work.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703954004576089850685724570.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110120/social-media-crackdowns-trigger-legal-fights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor Board Backs Worker Who Criticized on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101109/labor-board-backs-worker-who-criticized-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101109/labor-board-backs-worker-who-criticized-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Trottman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambulance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Medical Response of Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanie Trottman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=32233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Labor Relations Board is taking a stand on employees' rights to post negative comments about supervisors on social networking sites, alleging that a company illegally fired a worker for criticizing her boss on Facebook. The agency disclosed the complaint last week against ambulance service American Medical Response of Connecticut Inc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Labor Relations Board is taking a stand on employees&#8217; rights to post negative comments about supervisors on social networking sites, alleging that a company illegally fired a worker for criticizing her boss on Facebook. The agency disclosed the complaint last week against ambulance service American Medical Response of Connecticut Inc.</p>
<p>The NLRB, an independent federal agency that settles disputes between private-sector employers and employees, said the supervisor questioned the employee about a customer complaint on her work but that the employer illegally denied her representation from her union during the probe. The employee later posted the negative remark about the supervisor on her personal Facebook page from her home computer.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703514904575603500975269566.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101109/labor-board-backs-worker-who-criticized-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HotJobs Sold to Monster in Yahoo Garage Sale</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100203/yahoo-unloads-hotjobs-on-monster-for-225-million/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100203/yahoo-unloads-hotjobs-on-monster-for-225-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6Sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad serving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[career]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Bartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finanace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HotJobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hourly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobseekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Metrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster Worldwide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualified candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reseller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sal Iannuzzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stone Key Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique visitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wholesale trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=34184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, Yahoo’s efforts to sell off some of its noncore properties are going quite a bit better than previously thought. Moments ago, the company said it will sell Yahoo HotJobs to Monster Worldwide, proprietor of rival online career site Monster.com. Price: $225 million in cash.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/acquisitions_phag_thumb1.jpg" alt="acquisitions_phag_thumb" width="150" height="93" class="alignright size-full wp-image-30916" />Apparently, Yahoo’s efforts to sell off some of its noncore properties are going quite a bit better than <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-yahoo-cancels-small-business-unit-sale-report-hotjobs-too/">previously thought</a>.  Moments ago, the company said it will sell Yahoo HotJobs to Monster Worldwide (MWW), proprietor of rival online career site Monster.com. Price: $225 million in cash. </p>
<p>The deal, which is expected to close in the third quarter, involves a three-year traffic agreement under which Monster will become the provider of career and job content on the Yahoo (YHOO) homepage in the U.S. and Canada. </p>
<p>Obviously a smart move for Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz, who has been trying to narrow the company&#8217;s focus to its core portal business&#8211;most recently by selling email technology provider Zimbra to VMware (VMW).</p>
<p>Now, if only Bartz can unload Yahoo Games and Yahoo Shopping.</p>
<p>The release, below.</p>
<blockquote class="memo">
<p><strong>Monster to Acquire HotJobs Business and Enter into Multi-year Traffic Agreement with Yahoo!</strong><br />
NEW YORK &#038; MAYNARD, Mass., Feb 03, 2010 ——  Monster Worldwide, Inc. (MWW 16.42, +0.38, +2.37%)  announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the assets of Yahoo! HotJobs, a leading online recruitment website, from Yahoo! (YHOO 15.46, +0.29, +1.91%)  for $225 million in cash. Monster and Yahoo! have also entered into a three year commercial traffic agreement, to take effect upon the closing of the acquisition, in which Monster will become Yahoo!‘s provider of career and job content on the Yahoo! homepage in the United States and Canada. The traffic agreement calls for performance based annual payments calculated by clicks and expressions of interest, subject to annual floors and ceilings. In addition, the traffic agreement provides Monster with an exclusive right for a period of time following the closing of the acquisition to negotiate similar traffic agreements with Yahoo! properties on a global basis, including countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America, subject to certain limitations.</p>
<p>&#8220;HotJobs with its significant customer base plus the traffic agreement are an ideal complement to Monster’s innovative recruitment solutions and global reach,&#8221; said Sal Iannuzzi, chairman, chief executive officer and president of Monster Worldwide. &#8220;These agreements, combined with Monster’s career Communities and our recently introduced 6Sense(TM) semantic search technology, will bring substantial new benefits for employers seeking more qualified candidates and job seekers searching for more relevant opportunities across a wider range of industries—globally.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Bringing together Monster and HotJobs creates even greater access and opportunities for both recruiters and job seekers,&#8221; said Hilary Schneider, EVP, Yahoo! (NSDQ: YHOO). &#8220;The transaction with Monster enables us to continue to provide an important service to our users through the traffic agreement. Yahoo! remains focused on its core businesses and delivering exceptional experiences to users, partners and advertisers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Monster believes that the acquisition of HotJobs and the traffic agreement with Yahoo! will provide a number of benefits to jobseekers and employers, who today have more diverse competitive choices than ever before, and a value to all of its stakeholders, including its shareholders. These include:</p>
<p>Anticipated increase in job matches and search efficiencies&#8211;By bringing more diverse job and career opportunities, tools and resources together in one place, employers and job seekers will enjoy greater convenience and more precise search results and better matches with Monster’s patented 6Sense(TM) search technology and other innovative products.</p>
<p>Expected expansion of job seeker pool for employers&#8211;Monster will be able to offer its employers a significantly larger pool of candidates across diverse geographies and industries. Based on Media Metrix comScore (NSDQ: SCOR) reporting, last year HotJobs averaged 12.6 million unique visitors per month.</p>
<p>Expected expansion of the number of job postings across industries for job seekers&#8211;Through the combination of Monster and HotJobs job postings, job seekers will have access to more job opportunities in one place in those industries currently leading job creation, including healthcare, finance and insurance, retail, manufacturing, information and wholesale trade.</p>
<p>Broader reach anticipated for recruitment advertising through additional media alliances and reseller agreement&#8211;With the addition of HotJobs’s network of more than 600 daily and weekly newspapers, Monster’s alliances with local papers will grow to a total of approximately 1,000, giving Monster reach in all 50 states. The additional newspaper alliances, through their online and print classified ads, will further Monster’s current strategy of connecting job seekers with smaller, local businesses, particularly in healthcare, education, and skilled and hourly job categories.</p>
<p>Yahoo! will continue to manage its broader Newspaper Consortium (NPC) partnership, including providing both search and display advertising, content distribution, and its ad-serving platform, to newspapers in its NPC.</p>
<p>The transaction is subject to clearance under Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and other customary closing conditions. The transaction is currently expected to close sometime during the third quarter of 2010, subject to regulatory review. Monster expects to realize operating synergies from the acquisition and currently anticipates the transaction will be breakeven on a pro forma full year earnings in 2010 and accretive thereafter, inclusive of the costs incurred under the traffic agreement.</p>
<p>Stone Key Partners LLC and Bank of America Merrill Lynch acted as financial advisors to Monster in connection with this transaction. Allen &#038; Company LLC provided a fairness opinion to Monster’s Board.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100203/yahoo-unloads-hotjobs-on-monster-for-225-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April’s Job Loss Report Less of a Train Wreck Than March’s</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090506/april%e2%80%99s-job-loss-report-less-of-a-train-wreck-than-march%e2%80%99s/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090506/april%e2%80%99s-job-loss-report-less-of-a-train-wreck-than-march%e2%80%99s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[April]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenger Gray & Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Challenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Economic Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned workforce reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of job cuts made during April was the lowest since October. That’s the latest from outplacement services provider Challenger, Gray &#38; Christmas, which said today that “planned workforce reductions” in April were 132,590--12 percent fewer than the more than 150,000 recorded in March. Great news, right? Until you realize that the “planned reductions” to which the company refers were up 47 percent from a year earlier and are still at recession levels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/freecoffeefortheunemployed-250x175.jpg" alt="freecoffeefortheunemployed" title="freecoffeefortheunemployed" width="250" height="175" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-17019" />The number of job cuts made in April was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc04/idUKTRE5452O120090506?sp=true">the lowest since October</a>. That’s the latest from outplacement services provider Challenger, Gray &#038; Christmas, which said today that “planned workforce reductions” in April were 132,590&#8211;12 percent fewer than the more than 150,000 recorded in March.</p>
<p>Great news, right? Until you realize that the &#8220;planned reductions” to which the company refers were up 47 percent from a year earlier and are still at recession levels. So while this is the third consecutive month in which layoffs declined, the job market is still in lousy shape.</p>
<p>Employers have sacked 711,100 employees so far this year. That&#8217;s 145 percent percent more than the 290,671 they cut in the first quarter of 2008. Keep in mind, this is “planned layoffs” we’re talking about. Presumably there were some unplanned ones as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;Job cuts are still at recession levels, but the fact that they are falling is certainly promising and may suggest that employers are starting to feel a little more confident about future business conditions,” said Challenger CEO John Challenger. “Hopefully, the next few months will bring further relief, as we tend to see downsizing activity slow during the summer months.”</p>
<p>Yeah, “hopefully.” But don’t count on it. Because Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says the economy hasn’t quite bottomed out yet. Which means things may get a bit worse before they get better.</p>
<p>“The most recent information on the labor market&#8211;the number of new and continuing claims for unemployment insurance through late April&#8211;suggests that we are likely to see further sizable job losses and increased unemployment in coming months,” <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aoMAyV8N1S3Q&amp;refer=news">Bernanke recently told the congressional Joint Economic Committee.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090506/april%e2%80%99s-job-loss-report-less-of-a-train-wreck-than-march%e2%80%99s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Econalypto: A Rightsizing Roundup</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090127/econalypto-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090127/econalypto-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1945]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Labor Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nortel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Morici]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert H. Smith School of Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=11922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With IBM quietly contributing another 2,800 or so employees to the next Bureau of Labor Statistics Unemployment report, this seems like a fine time to pay respects to those who’ve gone before them. And there are many. In the past six months, thousands of workers have been right-sized and offboarded. Rebalanced and rationalized. “Smartsized.” Sacked. A quick scan of the carnage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/econalypto.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/econalypto-202x300.jpg" alt="" title="econalypto" width="202" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8951" /></a>With <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090127/so-much-for-ibms-lifetime-employment-concept/">IBM quietly contributing another 2,800 or so employees to the next Bureau of Labor Statistics Unemployment report</a>, this seems like a fine time to  pay respects to those who&#8217;ve gone before them. And there are many. In the past six months thousands of workers have been right-sized and offboarded. Rebalanced and rationalized. &#8220;Smartsized.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sacked.</p>
<p>A quick scan of the carnage.</p>
<ul>
<li> <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090126/sprint-nextel-to-cut-8000-jobs-palms-hopes-for-a-comeback/">8,000</a> whacked at Sprint (S)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090126/philips-to-release-6000-employees-into-wild/">6,000</a> let go at Royal Philips (PHG)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090116/amd-putting-the-micro-back-in-advanced-micro-devices/"> 1,100</a> sacked at AMD (AMD)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090114/well-motorola-picked-a-great-time-to-announce-more-layoffs/">4,000</a> adjusting to new economic realities at Motorola (MOT)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090112/seagate-defrags-ceo/">3,000</a> laid off at Seagate (STX)</li>
<li>And <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090112/oracle-layoffs-hundreds-not-thousands/">a few hundred</a> at Oracle (ORCL), as well</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090108/there-once-was-man-named-dell-who-told-1900-workers-go-to-hell/">1,900</a> declared redundant at Dell (DELL)</li>
<li><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090122/microsoft-earnings-and-revenues-take-a-big-hit-5000-to-be-laid-off/">5,000</a> losing their jobs at Microsoft (MSFT)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081212/alcatel-lucent-lets-get-small/">1,000 managers and 5,000 contractors</a> pink-slipped at Alcatel-Lucent (ALU)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081209/yahoo-lets-eat-and-drink-for-tomorrow-your-jobs-die/">1,500</a> gone at Yahoo (YHOO)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081204/att-announces-q4-morale-reduction/">12,000 released into the wild</a> at AT&#038;T (T)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081203/adobe-announces-q4-morale-reduction/">600</a> cut loose at Adobe (ADBE)</li>
<li><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081114/sun-to-stop-christmas-from-coming/">6,000</a> aligned with the global economic climate at Sun (JAVA)</li>
<li>And at Nortel (NT) <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081110/nortel/">1,300 positions</a> cut on top of the 1,200 previously announced</li>
</ul>
<p>Grim isn&#8217;t it? Sad thing is, this is just a simple snapshot of what&#8217;s been happening in tech. According to the Department of Labor, employers in the states shed 524,000 workers in December, 2.6 million in all of 2008. That makes the last year the worst for layoffs since 1945, when 2.75 million jobs were lost.  And that&#8217;s frightening, because according to some experts, we&#8217;ll get no respite in 2009. &#8220;We are very early in the cycle,&#8221; <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jan2009/db20090126_509671.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_news+%2B+analysis">Peter Morici, a professor at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland told BusinessWeek</a>, adding that we&#8217;ve so far only seen a sliver of the job losses to come. &#8220;We are going to see the fury of the Old Testament for what we have done to the economy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090127/econalypto-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

