<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Fidelity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/fidelity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Workday Picks Its Bankers for a Fall 2012 IPO</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120510/exclusive-workday-picks-its-bankers-for-a-fall-2012-ipo/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120510/exclusive-workday-picks-its-bankers-for-a-fall-2012-ipo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik Hesseldahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aneel Bhusri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back office applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bezos Expeditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Box.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Duffield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity Contrafund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greylock Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Peek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley Investment Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSD Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Enterprise Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeopleSoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rypple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuccessFactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taleo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violin Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Danoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zynga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=206622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having started a search for bankers in December, Workday has settled on four who will take it through the IPO process, starting with an S-1 filing expected in mid-July.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_135929" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 390px"><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/aneel_bhusri_bio/" rel="attachment wp-att-135929"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/10/Aneel_bhusri_bio-380x285.png" alt="" title="Aneel_bhusri_bio" width="380" height="285" class="size-Featured wp-image-135929" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aneel Bhusri</p></div>It&#8217;s going to be a busy summer and fall at the fast-growing cloud software start-up Workday. Once the madness of the Facebook IPO is over, which will probably be next week, Workday will be the most closely watched of a batch of public offerings from tech companies with an enterprise focus.</p>
<p>Sources familiar with the company&#8217;s plans tell <strong>AllThingsD</strong> that Workday has chosen the four bankers that will lead it through the IPO process: Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Allen &#038; Company and JPMorgan Chase &#038; Co. The search for bankers caps a process <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111223/workday-is-looking-for-bankers-to-help-it-go-ipo-in-2012/">begun in December</a>.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s IPO path calls for an S-1 filing to be made with the Securities and Exchange Commission by mid-July. After a late summer or early fall road show, its shares would debut between October and December, depending on how favorable market conditions are, sources familiar with the matter tell me.</p>
<p>The process began in earnest after Workday <a href="http://www.workday.com/company/news/press_archive/workday_appoints_chief_financial_officer.php">hired its new CFO, Mark Peek</a>, away from VMware, where he was also CFO.</p>
<p>Workday is feeling emboldened in part by the <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120213/investors-sure-love-them-some-jive-today/">successful offerings of Jive Software</a> and <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120419/and-its-off-splunk-rockets-108-percent-in-ipo-debut/">Splunk,</a> both enterprise companies with their hands in the cloud business. Workday itself is a pure cloud software play, specializing in human resources applications, a white-hot area of enterprise that has seen a lot of M&#038;A activity of late.</p>
<p>In December, software concern SAP <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111203/sap-to-acquire-successfactors-for-3-4-billion/">spent $3.4 billion to acquire SuccessFactors</a>. Then, in February, software giant <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120209/oracle-acquires-taleo-for-1-9-billion/">Oracle spent $1.9 billion to acquire Taleo</a>, in a deal that took place shortly after I <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111207/seven-questions-for-mike-gregoire-ceo-of-taleo/">interviewed Taleo&#8217;s CEO</a>. Even Salesforce got into the act, acquiring the <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111215/salesforce-gets-into-the-hr-cloud-with-rypple-acquisition/">start-up Rypple for an undisclosed amount</a> in December. </p>
<p>Much of that dealmaking came in response to concerns about Workday, especially after its impressive $85 million Series F round of institutional funding at a $2 billion valuation, which <strong>AllThingsD</strong> <a href=" http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/">reported exclusively in October</a>. A Bloomberg News report said that round was oversubscribed and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-22/workday-is-said-to-plan-to-raise-as-much-as-500-million-in-a-2012-ipo.html">grew to $100 million</a> when Michael Dell&#8217;s MSD Ventures joined.</p>
<p>Investors in that round included several who also took part in institutional rounds in Facebook and Web gaming player Zynga: T. Rowe Price, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Janus, and Bezos Expeditions, the personal investment entity of Amazon CEO and founder Jeff Bezos. William Danoff, the manager of Fidelity’s $80 billion Contrafund, the mutual fund giant’s largest stock-based fund, also participated in that round.</p>
<p>A Workday IPO, which would raise about $500 million, would make for a sweet payday for the company&#8217;s earlier investors, which include Dave Duffield and Greylock Partners, who invested $90 million in four rounds, and New Enterprise Associates, which joined a $75 million Series E round in 2009. By my math, Workday&#8217;s total capital raised comes to a cool $195 million.</p>
<p>So how&#8217;s business? With the company having disclosed $160 million in <del datetime="2012-05-10T18:51:53+00:00">billings</del> total bookings in 2010, sources familiar with its operations tell me bookings in 2011 exceeded 100 percent growth. That would be above the $320 million in 2011 bookings CEO Aneel Bhusri told me he expected last October.</p>
<p>Workday is essentially the creation of PeopleSoft vets Bhusri and Duffield. They started the company in 2005, not long after losing a pitched battle to resist a $10 billion hostile takeover by Oracle. Bhusri and Duffield concluded that the next battlefield for enterprise software would be in the cloud. They kickstarted Workday using their own money and some funding from Greylock, and brought some PeopleSoft employees with them.</p>
<p>The idea was to re-create PeopleSoft, which makes software that businesses need to run day to day, but to deliver it from the cloud.</p>
<p>And unlike other cloud players that approach smaller companies and work their way up to ever-larger customers, Workday&#8217;s customers are already in the big leagues. The average Workday customer &#8212; there are 280 &#8212; has between 10,000 and 15,000 employees. The biggest is Flextronics, the huge electronics manufacturing company, which has 200,000 employees. Other customers include Time Warner, Thomson Reuters, Chiquita Brands and Salesforce.com. There are Workday records on more than two million employees on its system. All that after only four-plus years of active selling. A second, newer line of financial applications aimed at helping companies more efficiently manage their spending is getting traction, too. </p>
<p>Workday will probably be the biggest among a pending batch of enterprise-oriented IPOs set for summer and fall after the Facebook madness is over. For one, there&#8217;s <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120430/exclusive-violin-memory-boosts-latest-funding-round-to-80-million/">Violin Memory</a>, which I&#8217;ve been reporting on quite a bit. And Reuters is reporting that cloud storage and collaboration concern Box is looking like it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/10/us-box-startup-idUSBRE8490XY20120510">eyeing an IPO in</a> 2013. The bankers are going to be busy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120510/exclusive-workday-picks-its-bankers-for-a-fall-2012-ipo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Workday Is Looking for Bankers to Help It Go IPO in 2012</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111223/workday-is-looking-for-bankers-to-help-it-go-ipo-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111223/workday-is-looking-for-bankers-to-help-it-go-ipo-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik Hesseldahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aneel Bhusri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bezos Expeditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrafund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Duffield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greylock Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human capital management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSD Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Enterprise Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeopleSoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SuccessFactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taleo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Danoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=156562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wait begins for one of the most anticipated IPOs of 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_135929" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 390px"><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/aneel_bhusri_bio/" rel="attachment wp-att-135929"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/10/Aneel_bhusri_bio-380x285.png" alt="" title="Aneel_bhusri_bio" width="380" height="285" class="size-Featured wp-image-135929" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aneel Bhusri</p></div>The pre-IPO buzz around the cloud-based human resources software company Workday has officially begun. Bloomberg News <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-22/workday-is-said-to-plan-to-raise-as-much-as-500-million-in-a-2012-ipo.html">reported yesterday</a> that Workday has started looking for banks to guide it through the process toward an offering that would raise as much as a half-billion dollars. Among those under consideration are Allen &#038; Co., Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan Chase.</p>
<p>Allen is said to have advised Workday on its recent funding round, which closed in October. As exclusively reported by <strong>AllThingsD</strong> at the time, Workday <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/">raised $85 million at an implied valuation of $2 billion</a>. The Series F was led by T. Rowe Price, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Janus and Bezos Expeditions, the personal investment entity of Amazon CEO and founder Jeff Bezos. Bloomberg also says that Michael Dell&#8217;s personal investment vehicle, MSD ventures, was in on that funding round, which grew to $100 million since the closing.</p>
<p>Previous investors include Dave Duffield and Greylock Partners, who are in for $90 million across four rounds; and New Enterprise Associates, which joined a $75 million Series E round in 2009.</p>
<p>Apparently encouraged by the successful IPO of Jive Software earlier this month, and the performance of its shares, which are up nicely since the debut, Workday now appears poised go through with the IPO that CEO Aneel Bhusri (pictured) hinted in October would take place during the second half of 2012.</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s no question that Workday is in a hot space. <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111205/after-sap-successfactors-deal-the-cloud-is-a-different-place/">SAP&#8217;s $3.4 billion acquisition of SuccessFactors</a> last month, plus <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111215/salesforce-gets-into-the-hr-cloud-with-rypple-acquisition/">Salesforce.com&#8217;s deal for Rypple</a> last week, attest to the urgency with which larger companies want to be in the HR software business.</p>
<p>Think about it: Every company &#8212; of any size &#8212; needs to keep track of its people, their salaries, performance-review information and so on. And why bother with software that runs on the local machines, when the cloud is so much more efficient?</p>
<p>Bhusri was a senior executive and co-chairman of PeopleSoft’s board, and was on hand for that company&#8217;s hostile takeover by Oracle. After losing that battle, he and co-founder Dave Duffield concluded that the next battlefield for enterprise software would be in the cloud. </p>
<p>Workday’s average customer has between 10,000 and 15,000 employees. Among its 250-odd customers, the biggest is Flextronics, the huge electronics manufacturing company, which has 200,000 employees. Others include Time Warner, Thomson Reuters, Chiquita Brands and, perhaps unsurprisingly, Salesforce.com. Workday has some two million employees in its system.</p>
<p>And while there&#8217;s no S-1 filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission to peruse yet, the IPO watch on Workday officially begins now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111223/workday-is-looking-for-bankers-to-help-it-go-ipo-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wealthfront Finally Launches, Aimed at Silicon Valley's "Richie Rich" Newbies</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111201/wealthfront-finally-lauches-aimed-at-silicon-valleys-newbie-richie-richs/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111201/wealthfront-finally-lauches-aimed-at-silicon-valleys-newbie-richie-richs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Rachleff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAG Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaChing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Andreessen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Financial Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palo Alto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealthfront]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=149082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a financial planning tool aimed at geeks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111201/wealthfront-finally-lauches-aimed-at-silicon-valleys-newbie-richie-richs/richierichno45cover/" rel="attachment wp-att-149083"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/12/RichieRichNo45Cover-189x285.png" alt="" title="RichieRichNo45Cover" width="189" height="285" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-149083" /></a></p>
<p>Wealthfront, the Silicon Valley start-up with more than $10 million in its own kitty, finally officially launched its long-planned Online Financial Advisor product today, with a focus on attracting techies interested in more easily managing their money.</p>
<p>The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company, which started off as a social investing site called kaChing, <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20101019/presto-chango-kaching-becomes-wealthfront/">shifted over to the new plan</a> just over a year ago. Its aim now is to try to solve the thorny problem of delivering actionable and easy-to-use tools for making investments online, for those who have some money but little time or expertise. </p>
<p>A lot of companies offer similar tools, of course, including big ones such as Fidelity and Schwab, as well as bigger money-management firms. But Wealthfront&#8217;s CEO Andy Rachleff and founder Dan Carroll are promising lower fees and more accurate determination of risk via all kinds of online bells and whistles (see below).</p>
<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111201/wealthfront-finally-lauches-aimed-at-silicon-valleys-newbie-richie-richs/investment-plan-page/" rel="attachment wp-att-149133"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/12/Investment-plan-page-640x360.png" alt="" title="Investment plan page" width="640" height="360" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-149133" /></a></p>
<p>Wealthfront is not charging advisory fees on a customer&#8217;s first $25,000 under management, with a fee of 0.25% on assets exceeding that.</p>
<p>Wealthfront is backed by DAG Ventures and well-known investors, including Marc Andreessen and Jeff Jordan.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video Wealthfront posted about the service, as well as its official press release:</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/32847702?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p><strong>Wealthfront Unveils Automated Online Financial Advisor Service for Silicon Valley and High-Tech Hubs</p>
<p>Highly Sophisticated Investing Advice Finally Made Available through Simple and Low Cost Web Service  </p>
<p>PALO ALTO, Calif., December 1, 2011 &#8211;</strong> The ability for the savvy tech community to easily access high quality, affordable financial advice is now available with the launch of the Wealthfront Online Financial Advisor. Before Wealthfront, sophisticated investment advice was available only to the wealthy, by expensive financial advisors who often can&#8217;t relate to today&#8217;s tech-savvy generation who want sound financial advice, made easy and convenient. Wealthfront&#8217;s Online Financial Advisor appeals to investors from booming tech communities who favor doing everything online, and are looking for ways to have their new wealth managed for far lower fees. </p>
<p>At the core of Wealthfront&#8217;s web service is the industry-standard Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). Until now, the widely adopted investing model has been kept out of consumers&#8217; reach, and was only accessible via expensive financial advisors. Wealthfront automates the application of this intricate investment model, putting the power of MPT directly into the hands of investors online. Moreover, Wealthfront&#8217;s pricing structure trumps all traditional financial advisor models. The online service makes it possible to receive a sophisticated, meticulously managed investment plan at a price that is 75% lower than traditional financial advisors. There are no advisory fees on a customer&#8217;s first $25,000 under management, and only a fee of 0.25% on assets exceeding $25,000.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is exactly what most people in the technology industry need. It&#8217;s the kind of advice you&#8217;d get if you had Goldman Sachs manage your money and it does away with the hidden fees we in tech despise,&#8221; said Piaw Na, a long time, former employee of Google and popular blogger on the topic of investing.  &#8220;What&#8217;s more, the recommendation on the investment mix is provided with a full explanation of what was picked and why, making the whole experience a massive and much needed shift that is especially appealing now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wealthfront&#8217;s high quality investing advice is powered by its Precision-Investing Platform™, the breakthrough software behind the service. The Platform uniquely assesses a customer&#8217;s true risk tolerance, recommends an optimized portfolio of carefully selected Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) spanning six asset classes, and monitors and periodically rebalances the investment mix to maintain a customer&#8217;s desired risk tolerance. </p>
<p>Wealthfront is backed by Silicon Valley luminaries including DAG Ventures and individual investors including Marc Andreessen, Jeff Jordan, former OpenTable CEO and President of PayPal now at venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, and partners from Benchmark Capital, Index Ventures and Kleiner Perkins Caufield &#038; Byers.</p>
<p>&#8220;The financial advisor world has long recognized that one day the Internet and software would pose a credible threat to their hold on the sub $5 million category of individual investors,&#8221; said Paul Pfleiderer, C.O.G. Miller Distinguished Professor of Finance at Stanford Graduate School of Business, and Wealthfront advisor. &#8220;Wealthfront has made accessible what historically had been out of reach or prohibitively costly for a large class of investors. By using a simple, yet powerful engine for accurately assessing risk and return in the MPT context, Wealthfront has established a new standard for quality financial advisement on the web.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;With the biggest names in venture capital and the brightest minds in software development, we&#8217;re ushering in a financial advisor service that’s capable of precisely managing a customer’s investments from $5,000 to tens of millions with a pricing approach unheard of in the financial services industry,&#8221; said Andy Rachleff, CEO of Wealthfront. &#8220;Wealthfront emerges at a time when many tech companies are enjoying record earnings, initial public offerings, and strong acquisitions. This creates masses of people in tech looking to invest for the first time and who want to manage their finances in the same manner they’ve organized every other aspect of their lives, online.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The promise of the Internet is to disrupt incumbent providers, enabling new companies to provide high quality services at substantial savings through the innovative use of software,&#8221; said Jeff Jordan, Wealthfront board member, former CEO OpenTable and President of PayPal and now General Partner at Andreessen Horowitz.  &#8220;Wealthfront embodies this promise, democratizing access to high quality financial advice. I believe this will appeal strongly to a generation that has grown up with the Net and use it to manage all facets of their life.&#8221; </p>
<p>For more information on Wealthfront Online Financial Advisor, or to create a free account, visit www.wealthfront.com.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111201/wealthfront-finally-lauches-aimed-at-silicon-valleys-newbie-richie-richs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Aneel Bhusri's Workday Raises $85 Million at a Whopping $2 Billion Valuation</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik Hesseldahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aneel Bhusri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bezos Expeditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrafund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Duffield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human capital management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Benioff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeopleSoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Danoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zynga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=135921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cloud-based human resources software outfit is growing fast and eyeing an IPO next year. Among its new investors: T. Rowe Price, Morgan Stanley and Fidelity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_135929" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 390px"><a href="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/10/Aneel_bhusri_bio.png"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/10/Aneel_bhusri_bio-380x253.png" alt="" title="Aneel_bhusri_bio" width="380" height="253" class="size-medium wp-image-135929" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aneel Bhusri</p></div>It&#8217;s beginning to look like this whole enterprise software-in-the-cloud thing might just go somewhere. For the latest evidence, look no further than Workday, the fast-growing provider of human resources software as a service.</p>
<p>Today, Workday will announce that it has just raised $85 million in new financing, bringing its total amount of capital raised to $250 million. Sources familiar with the terms of the deal tell me that the investments value Workday at $2 billion.</p>
<p>The funding round isn&#8217;t coming from traditional venture capital players, but from institutional investors who will want to be shareholders of Workday when it goes public in the second half of next year. The round, which is being described as a Series F, includes T. Rowe Price, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Janus, and Bezos Expeditions, the personal investment entity of Amazon CEO and founder Jeff Bezos.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also told, by sources familiar with the deal, that William Danoff, the manager of Fidelity&#8217;s $80 billion Contrafund, the mutual fund giant&#8217;s largest stock-based fund, has participated in this funding round. This would be the Contrafund&#8217;s third recent investment in a privately held Internet company, the other two being Facebook and Zynga. In fact, it&#8217;s the same group of funds that took part in a huge round with social gaming force <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110217/zynga-raises-500-million-at-10-billion-valuation/">Zynga in February</a>; in <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110107/exclusive-first-half-of-groupon-funding-done-dst-t-rowe-price-fidelity-capital-group-and-morgan-stanley/">Groupon in January</a>; and which earlier this year bought nearly <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-01/fidelity-s-danoff-bets-on-facebook-zynga.html">three million shares of Facebook for $25 each.</a></p>
<p>Previous investors include Dave Duffield and Greylock Partners, who are in for $90 million across four rounds; and New Enterprise Associates, which joined a $75 million Series E round in 2009.</p>
<p>Why raise from institutionals and not VCs? &#8220;Because Workday is going to go public, and probably before the end of next year,&#8221; Bhusri told me. &#8220;Rather than do a round that adds an overhang to the existing capital structure, this is a group of investors who will likely buy more in the IPO,&#8221; he said. &#8220;In some ways, it&#8217;s an early debut of an IPO.&#8221;</p>
<p>And while there&#8217;s no S-1 filing from Workday to peruse just yet, Bhusri told me that Workday is growing plenty fast. Having disclosed $160 million in billings in 2010, Workday, he says, is on track to do twice that &#8212; or about $320 million in 2011 &#8212; and that it&#8217;s close to breaking even. So this round of capital is insurance. With the world economy so out of joint, if no logical window for an IPO emerges in 2012 &#8212; a reasonable worry &#8212; then Workday won&#8217;t be forced, should the need arise, to raise more capital in a difficult market.</p>
<p>So what is Workday, exactly? For the answer, you have to turn the clock back to 2004, when the software giant Oracle made its initial hostile bid to take over PeopleSoft. Bhusri was a senior executive and co-chairman of PeopleSoft&#8217;s board. After losing the battle to resist Oracle, he and co-founder Dave Duffield decided that the next battle for enterprise software would be in the cloud. Workday was born within months of their departure from PeopleSoft.</p>
<p>The plan, Bhusri says, was to create the next generation of PeopleSoft&#8217;s software, or the next generation of SAP&#8217;s Human Resources and Enterprise Resource planning software &#8212; essentially, software that businesses need to run day to day. But rather than deliver it in the traditional manner &#8212; run it on machines at the customer&#8217;s location &#8212; it&#8217;s all delivered via the cloud. &#8220;It&#8217;s as if you were going to start over with a clean sheet of paper and design this kind of software all over again,&#8221; Bhusri says.</p>
<p>And Workday&#8217;s customers aren&#8217;t exactly small players. Its average customer has between 10,000 and 15,000 employees. Among its 250-odd customers, the biggest is Flextronics, the huge electronics manufacturing company, which has 200,000 employees. Other customers include Time Warner, Thomson Reuters, Chiquita Brands, and perhaps unsurprisingly, Salesforce.com. There are some two million employees on the system. All that after only four years of actively selling the product.</p>
<p>And what Workday sells is a system that tends not to get replaced very often in large companies &#8212; perhaps once a decade. That gives the company an advantage when it asks for contract commitments that last three years; most cloud companies offer their services on a pay-as-you-go basis.</p>
<p>Workday&#8217;s targets are Bhusri&#8217;s old customers who bought PeopleSoft software to run their businesses one product generation back, and also those who run SAP software. So when a new customer signs on it&#8217;s usually one or the other being displaced. Other rivals include Lawson, Infor and, occasionally, the <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111002/why-adp-is-the-biggest-cloud-company-youve-never-heard-of/">payroll giant ADP</a>.</p>
<p>The typical new customer, Bhusri said, is using one of those other platforms and is ready to upgrade. &#8220;To upgrade to the newest version, they get a price quote that&#8217;s so high they start looking for a better way,&#8221; he says. &#8220;That&#8217;s when they find us.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Workday isn&#8217;t sitting still with HR software. Its next battle will be in financial planning software that companies rely on to handle money &#8212; accounting, expenses, procurement. Workday already has 50 customers running the financial stuff. Once they try Workday&#8217;s HR, they like what they see, making for an easy upsell. Others just swap out both the HR and financial parts in one go, Bhusri said. And the competitive targets are the same as well: Oracle and SAP. One wonders if they aren&#8217;t just a little worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111024/aneel-bhusris-workday-raises-85-million-at-a-whopping-2-billion-valuation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silicon Valley Vets Aim to Bring Personal Financial Services to the Masses</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110920/silicon-valley-vets-aim-to-bring-personal-financial-services-to-the-masses/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110920/silicon-valley-vets-aim-to-bring-personal-financial-services-to-the-masses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Duryee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Schwab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Sha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pageonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikinvest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=122470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Harris, former CEO of Intuit and PayPal, is unveiling his latest company today: Personal Capital, which melds technology with financial advisory services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though this Silicon Valley company&#8217;s dress code requires men to wear a shirt and tie to work (no jacket), the vibe is inherently high-tech.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-122482" title="Personal_Capital_logo" src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/09/Personal_Capital_logo.png" alt="" width="325" height="80" />Personal Capital&#8217;s CEO, Bill Harris, who headed up Intuit and PayPal previously, is unveiling his latest company today, which melds technology with financial advisory services.</p>
<p>He says the goal is to bring the decades-old business of managing money to the masses, by replacing fancy offices and golf club memberships with software and video chatting.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think we are going to see a radical deconstruction of financial services over the next decade that may be similar to what&#8217;s happened to the media or GM,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t mean they will go away, but they will look astonishingly different. That spells tremendous opportunity. It&#8217;s really difficult to take a large company with established ways of doing business and change.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the surface, it doesn&#8217;t look like <a href="https://www.personalcapital.com/">Personal Capital</a> would have a chance against Merrill Lynch, Charles Schwab, Fidelity or Edward Jones.</p>
<p>It has zero clients, 40 employees, zero branches, $27 million in capital and obviously a long, long way to go. Harris admits: &#8220;I bet Wells Fargo or Schwab has 1,000 engineers for QA (quality assurance) alone,&#8221; but he counters, &#8220;We are better off than they are because we can move quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-Medium380 wp-image-122472" title="Personal Capital NYTPortfolio" src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/09/Personal-Capital-NYTPortfolio-380x329.png" alt="" width="380" height="329" /></p>
<p>In a demonstration, Harris walked me through the site, where you can log in to all of your various bank accounts and brokerage accounts.</p>
<p>By doing so, Personal Capital will be able to see everything in one snapshot, so it can tell you that you are invested 79 percent in U.S. stocks, or if you have too much cash. You can even drill down to see how much money you spend at Amazon on a monthly basis, or on a category like groceries.</p>
<p>All of these tools are free, but users will have to pay for the advice &#8212; if they should want it.</p>
<p>Harris said the tools show you what you have, but the advice will tell you what to do if you are over-invested in U.S. stocks, or in a particular company.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most people have no idea and it&#8217;s the most important financial decision that you have to make,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The advisers will also help you eliminate fees that you are currently paying for mutual funds and come up with a long-term plan.</p>
<p>Personal Capital charges less than 1 percent of all the assets it is managing a year, which is below other brick-and-mortar businesses, he says. Additionally, the sales people don&#8217;t work on commission, so their interests are aligned with the client.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m 55, and in some ways this is the culmination of my career,&#8221; Harris said. &#8220;I&#8217;ve done so much in financial technology over the past 20 years. &#8230; All of it has been pieces of the puzzle.&#8221;</p>
<p>Personal Capital is not the only one in Silicon Valley going after Wall Street.</p>
<p>Harris is also an adviser to <a href="https://www.wikinvest.com/account/portfolio/regx/start">Wikinvest</a> and <a href="http://www.pageonce.com/">PageOnce</a>.</p>
<p>PageOnce <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110511/pageonce-raises-15-million-build-apps-to-help-people-manage-their-bills/">is building mobile applications</a> to help people track their bills. Similar to Personal Invest, Wikinvest is building software to help users manage assets across multiple accounts. But instead of using advisers to make recommendations, it will eventually provide tips using algorithms to decide what is cheaper or more lucrative based on your holdings.</p>
<p>&#8220;I would argue that nowhere near enough is being done,&#8221; Harris said. &#8220;If you look at finance overall, it&#8217;s a huge and vital part of the American and global economy, and finance is one of the largest industries in the world. It&#8217;s up there with housing and autos and medicine. But when I think of all the industries where the Internet, or connectivity or mobile, has changed everything, it could be even more transformed.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to get Harris up on his soap box, but Michael Sha, the CEO of Wikinvest, will join him.</p>
<p>Sha says the irony in the industry is that the more you pay for financial services, the lower your return. Still, it&#8217;s not the aim of Wikinvest to replace the big brokerage houses. Its users will need them to make a trade.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video of Harris, wearing a jacket and displaying the polish of Wall St.:</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/29220329?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/29220329">Bill Harris Overview</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/personalcapital">Personal Capital</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110920/silicon-valley-vets-aim-to-bring-personal-financial-services-to-the-masses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sputtering Video</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110427/sputtering-video/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110427/sputtering-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mossberg's Mailbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mailbox.allthingsd.com/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt answers a reader's question on what to do about online videos that start and stop throughout.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="mailbox-q">Q:</p>
<p class="mailbox-question"><em> Every time I want to view a video on YouTube, the video repeatedly starts and stops. Sometimes a five-minute video takes 20 to 30 minutes to view. This happens on all my computers and on my smartphone. What can I do to correct this problem?</em></p>
<p class="mailbox-a">A:</p>
<p> Since the problem exists on all your devices, I would guess that it&#8217;s an issue of some kind with your network, or perhaps the router or modem you are using. I&#8217;m sorry that I can&#8217;t precisely diagnose the problem from afar, but I&#8217;d suggest talking to your Internet-service provider and troubleshooting the router or modem. Sometimes network issues can be solved by merely rebooting the router, switching it off and then on after a few minutes.</p>
<p class="mailbox-q">Q:</p>
<p class="mailbox-question"><em> I have the Fidelity app on my iPhone, and wonder about the security involved in placing stock trades through it.</em></p>
<p class="mailbox-a">A:</p>
<p> Remember that a smartphone is really a computer, and nothing in the consumer computer world can be deemed with certainty to be totally secure from the subculture of malicious hackers, whose motives are often financial. Having said that, I am unaware of any incidents in which iPhones in the hands of consumers have been compromised in a way that steals financial data sent over cellular networks. Further, I assume that Fidelity has some form of encryption for such transactions. </p>
<p>Still, I will repeat my oft-stated advice: Never perform confidential online business on any computing device over a public Wi-Fi network.</p>
<p class="tagline">You can find Mossberg&#8217;s Mailbox and Walt&#8217;s other columns at <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com">http://walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110427/sputtering-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At Least Andrew Mason&#039;s Goat Rodeo of Groupon Investors Will Be Fun to Watch!</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110112/andrew-masons-goat-rodeo-of-groupon-investors-will-be-fun-to-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110112/andrew-masons-goat-rodeo-of-groupon-investors-will-be-fun-to-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accel Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adorkable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and Technology Crossover Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andreessen Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Mason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battery Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DST Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goat rodeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greylock Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Bieber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail.ru Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maverick Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Enterprise Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pig pile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Conway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Leonsis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=39446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a ridiculously large investor group and an even larger pile of expectations now, how will Groupon manage its funding success going forward?

Whatever happens, the social buying service's gathering of many of the digital arena's most prominent VC firms, institutional investors and angels could be one of the digital sectors most interesting sideshows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/ac_job_goat_rodeo_shirt-p23529015215345816436r7_400.jpeg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/ac_job_goat_rodeo_shirt-p23529015215345816436r7_400-275x275.jpg" alt="" title="ac_job_goat_rodeo_shirt-p23529015215345816436r7_400" width="275" height="275" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-39448" /></a></p>
<p>Next week, at the DLD conference in Munich, Germany, BoomTown will be interviewing one of my favorite start-up CEOs: Andrew Mason of Groupon.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s my very first question for the adorkable toast of the digital town, who has just <a href="http://emoney.allthingsd.com/20110110/groupon-closes-out-nearly-billion-dollar-round/">collected a billion dollars in funding</a>, giving his hot social buying site a $4.75 billion valuation?</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not about what Mason is going to do with all that moolah.</p>
<p>Not, it&#8217;s not about why Groupon spurned the $6 billion acquisition offer from Google (and the Yahoo one before that).</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not about what hair care products Mason uses to get his hair looking so much like Justin Bieber&#8217;s coif.</p>
<p>Most of all, what I want to know is how he&#8217;s going to manage his ridiculously large&#8211;and, let&#8217;s be honest, <em>very</em> opinionated&#8211;investor group, which is made up of a big chunk of the digital arena&#8217;s most prominent VC firms, institutional investors and angels.</p>
<p>Consider the list, which is much more diverse than Facebook&#8217;s at a similar time in its gestation (and, in fact, it feels a lot like the social networking site&#8217;s current investor stampede):</p>
<p>Andreessen Horowitz, Battery Ventures, Greylock Partners, Kleiner Perkins Caufield &#038; Byers, Mail.ru Group (formerly DST Global), Maverick Capital, Silver Lake, and Technology Crossover Ventures, New Enterprise Associates, Accel Partners, T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, Capital Group, Morgan Stanley, former AOL exec Ted Leonsis and others.</p>
<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/rrg_pigpile.jpeg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/rrg_pigpile-275x161.jpg" alt="" title="rrg_pigpile" width="275" height="161" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-39455" /></a></p>
<p>(How in the world is the ubiquitous Ron Conway not shoved in this pig pile? <em>Or is he?</em>)</p>
<p>And, of course, the inevitable Allen &#038; Company acted as financial advisor for this massive funding, which also feels like a bit of a private pre-IPO.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see exactly whom among this shareholder group that Mason and the other top Groupon execs will listen to and who will have the most influence over the next year.</p>
<p>None of the new moneybags got a board seat, which is probably a good thing. As most entrepreneurs know all too well, investors can be a tricky thing&#8211;at once helpful and then not so much.</p>
<p>Mason, a clearly gifted exec, certainly has his hands full now, managing expectations for the fast-growing company, as well as the business itself.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that now that this surreal investor sideshow circus is over, that Groupon&#8217;s precious time can be focused on just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110112/andrew-masons-goat-rodeo-of-groupon-investors-will-be-fun-to-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Half of Groupon Funding Done&#8211;DST, T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, Capital Group and Morgan Stanley</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110107/exclusive-first-half-of-groupon-funding-done-dst-t-rowe-price-fidelity-capital-group-and-morgan-stanley/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110107/exclusive-first-half-of-groupon-funding-done-dst-t-rowe-price-fidelity-capital-group-and-morgan-stanley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DST Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LivingSocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=39260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Groupon has officially raised half of a $950 million funding, getting $500 million from a range of top-drawer investors, said sources close to the situation.

Those investors include Russia's DST Global, T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, Capital Group and Morgan Stanley.

It's unclear how much each investor has put in and who will make up the next tranche of funding, which will also close imminently.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/funny-pictures-black-cat-money-murder-contract.jpeg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/funny-pictures-black-cat-money-murder-contract-275x206.jpg" alt="" title="funny-pictures-black-cat-money-murder-contract" width="275" height="206" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-39261" /></a></p>
<p>Groupon has officially completed the raising of half of a $950 million funding, getting $500 million from a range of top-drawer investors, said sources close to the situation.</p>
<p>Those investors include Russia&#8217;s DST Global, T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, Capital Group and Morgan Stanley.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unclear how much each investor has put in and who will make up the next tranche of funding, which will also close imminently.</p>
<p>The New York Times previously reported on the regulatory filing related to the funding, as well as investments from T. Rowe Price, Fidelity and Morgan Stanley.</p>
<p>Now completed, the investments value the Chicago-based social buying service at $4.75 billion, which is less than the $6 billion Google offered to buy Groupon.</p>
<p>Those acquisition talks failed. But Groupon is still attracting interest from other possible buyers.</p>
<p>For now, though, it&#8217;s just talking a pile of money&#8211;probably the right strategy&#8211;to keep growing its explosive business. A big chunk will also go to some Groupon execs and early investors.</p>
<p>Groupon has competitors, of course, such as LivingSocial, but has established itself as the leader in the local online discounting space.</p>
<p>Allen &#038; Co. is advising Groupon on the fundraising.</p>
<p>A Groupon spokeswoman declined to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110107/exclusive-first-half-of-groupon-funding-done-dst-t-rowe-price-fidelity-capital-group-and-morgan-stanley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spoiler Alert: PlayBook Outshines iPad in RIM Video</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101116/spoiler-alert-playbook-outshines-ipad-in-rim-video/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101116/spoiler-alert-playbook-outshines-ipad-in-rim-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7-inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rendering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research In Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=52721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research in Motion hasn't yet launched its new BlackBerry PlayBook tablet and won't until 2011, but it's already kicked off the campaign to position it against what's likely to be its archrival: Apple's iPad. And--no surprise--in RIM's side-by-side comparison, the PlayBook comes out on top.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/09/playbookthumb.jpg" alt="" title="playbookthumb" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-49451" />Research in Motion hasn&#8217;t yet launched its new BlackBerry PlayBook tablet and won&#8217;t until 2011, but it&#8217;s already kicked off <a href="http://blogs.blackberry.com/2010/11/blackberry-playbook-and-ipad-comparison-web-fidelity-video">the campaign</a> to position it against what&#8217;s likely to be its archrival: Apple&#8217;s iPad.</p>
<p>In a new RIM video (below), the PlayBook is pitted against the iPad in a side-by-side comparison of &#8220;Web fidelity.&#8221; And what do you know: The PlayBook comes out looking better. In the video, RIM&#8217;s 7-inch tablet pulls up complete Web pages as the iPad slogs behind. Where the PlayBook shows off rich Flash content, the iPad &#8220;actually has an error&#8230;you&#8217;ll see that it says Flash is not supported&#8221; and instead delivers a &#8220;rather mundane, boring-looking HTML site.&#8221; In the Acid 3 test of compatibility with Web standards, the iPad does get an A, but the PlayBook gets an A+ with &#8220;pixel-perfect rendering.&#8221; And where the PlayBook&#8217;s Javascript and HTML5 animations are smooth and fluid, the iPad&#8217;s look choppy.</p>
<p>If this is the direction RIM takes with its eventual ad campaign (and if the performance differences are borne out in real-world use), it could score some points. Enough to dent the iPad&#8217;s &#8220;magic&#8221;? Well, we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p><object width="350" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/s72rGDUn2uo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/s72rGDUn2uo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="350" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101116/spoiler-alert-playbook-outshines-ipad-in-rim-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office Simplified For the Web</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100609/microsoft-office-simplified-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100609/microsoft-office-simplified-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backstage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office for Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office.live.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OneNote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ribbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SkyDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Window Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoho]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/?p=1331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt reviews the simplified Microsoft Office that's free and online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am writing this in Microsoft Word, hardly an unusual way to author a document. But I&#8217;m not using Word as you know it—part of the large, complex Microsoft Office suite installed on your computer&#8217;s hard drive. Instead, I am using a new, streamlined version of Word that for the first time resides on remote servers you reach through the Internet.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=3D3AE6B4-A9F8-4CFB-9072-3CB4E3E2A3FD&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={3D3AE6B4-A9F8-4CFB-9072-3CB4E3E2A3FD}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>This new version of Word is used inside a Web browser. It works on both Windows PCs and Macs, and via the newer versions of the major browsers, including Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Chrome. It&#8217;s free and it doesn&#8217;t require you to have regular Office on your computer.</p>
<p>Word isn&#8217;t the only Office component that&#8217;s now available in a free online version. Microsoft (MSFT) has created similar simplified versions of Excel, PowerPoint and its OneNote note-taking program as part of the free online suite called Office Web Apps, which is available at office.live.com. To use the new online Office, you&#8217;ll need a free account for the company&#8217;s broader Windows Live online service.</p>
<p>Microsoft is also releasing a new version of its traditional desktop Office for Windows next week, called Office 2010. But in my view, the online edition is the most interesting new development for consumers in this round of updates. It&#8217;s part of the broader trend toward cloud computing—doing tasks online rather than with desktop programs. And it&#8217;s meant to help the software giant compete with rival online office suites from competitors like Google (GOOG) and Zoho.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing Office Web Apps on both Windows and Mac computers, and in all four major browsers, and I like it. It has some downsides and is still a work in progress. It lacks many of the more sophisticated features of the local, desktop version of Office. In fact, Microsoft—apparently trying to protect its profitable desktop suite—refers to Office Web Apps as a &#8220;companion&#8221; to desktop Office, for &#8220;light&#8221; work.</p>
<div class="media-CENTER" style="width:360px;"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AV380_PTECHj_G_20100609170505.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="PTECHjp"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AV380_PTECHj_G_20100609170505.jpg" width="360" height="240" style="float: none;" alt="PTECHjp" /></a><br />
<br />
The Office Web Apps version of Word is used inside a Web browser.</div>
<p>But these are capable, if simpler, programs that look and feel like their desktop counterparts and they will likely meet the needs of many consumers who produce basic documents, even if they don&#8217;t own desktop Office. Also, the new Web Apps are connected to a generous 25 gigabytes of free online storage for your documents, via a companion Microsoft online storage system called SkyDrive.</p>
<p>Another big benefit: Microsoft boasts its Office Web Apps produce documents that use the same file formats as the desktop programs and thus, look fully accurate when opened in desktop Office. The company calls this &#8220;fidelity.&#8221; In my tests, this claim held true, at least on my Windows PC. (A revised version of Microsoft Office for the Mac, tuned to work with Web Apps, is in the works.)</p>
<p>The new version of the desktop Office suite also has many new features, but a lot of these are for power users or corporate users, and, overall, it isn&#8217;t nearly as big a change as its predecessor, Office 2007. Among the new desktop features consumers will notice and use are the extension of the consolidated top tool bar called the &#8220;Ribbon,&#8221; introduced in the 2007 version in most Office programs, to Outlook; a new unified view for printing, sharing and previewing documents, called &#8220;Backstage&#8221;; and richer graphics. You can also now customize the Ribbon.</p>
<p>In my tests of the streamlined Office Web Apps, I was able to use a variety of fonts and styles, insert and resize photos, and create tables. And I was able to view my documents, though not edit them, on an iPhone and iPad. This also works with other mobile devices.</p>
<p>One glitch I ran into in the Word Web App was that, if you use a tab to start a paragraph, it changes the left margin of each subsequent line. Microsoft says this is a bug and it is working to fix it.</p>
<p>Another downside for some users may be that the Web Apps only directly open documents from, and save them to, your online SkyDrive storage, not your hard disk. So you have to upload files from your hard disk to SkyDrive to edit them in the Web Apps. And, like most cloud-based programs, they can only be used when you&#8217;re online.</p>
<p>There are numerous things you may be used to doing in desktop Office that can&#8217;t be done in the online version. For instance, you can&#8217;t drag photos by the corners to resize them, embed videos, create slide transitions or add new spreadsheet charts.</p>
<p>You can, with one click, open a Web version of your document in the full desktop program, to take advantage of richer editing. However, this only works with certain combinations of browsers and desktop Office versions.</p>
<p>Two of the Web apps, Excel and OneNote, allow multiple users to log on and work on the same document together. The others don&#8217;t yet. In fact, in my tests, I couldn&#8217;t open a Word document locally until I had closed it online, and vice versa. Microsoft says it is working on expanding simultaneous use to all the apps.</p>
<p>Office Web Apps are a good start for Microsoft at bringing its productivity expertise to the Web, and may be all many consumers need for creating simple documents.</p>
<p class="tagline">Find Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos, free, at walt.allthingsd.com. Email him at mossberg@wsj.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100609/microsoft-office-simplified-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BoomTown&#039;s 1998 Rob Glaser Profile: A Web Pioneer Does a Delicate Dance With Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100114/boomtowns-1998-rob-glaser-profile-a-web-pioneer-does-a-delicate-dance-with-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100114/boomtowns-1998-rob-glaser-profile-a-web-pioneer-does-a-delicate-dance-with-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accel Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrivals departures feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clenched fist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coopetition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet Coke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French Polynesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Breyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macromedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCI Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercedes Benz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Slade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Kapor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Myhrvold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetShow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paramount Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Broadcasting System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealAudio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealNetworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealSystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Tong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Glaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VXtreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What's Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=23045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BoomTown did an interview last night with outgoing RealNetworks CEO Rob Glaser after the announcement yesterday of his departure from the company he founded and led for 16 years.

That will be posted later today, but here is a profile I wrote about Glaser when I was covering the Internet for The Wall Street Journal.

It's from Feb. 12, 1998, and focuses on Glaser's decidedly complicated relationship with his former employer, Microsoft.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/2740.jpg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/2740.jpg" alt="2740" title="2740" width="230" height="230" class="alignright size-full wp-image-23050" /></a></p>
<p>BoomTown did an interview last night with outgoing RealNetworks (RNWK) CEO Rob Glaser after the announcement yesterday of <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100113/rob-glaser-out-as-realnetworks-ceo/">his departure</a> from the company he founded and led for 16 years.</p>
<p>That will be posted later today, but here is a profile of Glaser I wrote after spending time with him in Seattle, when I was covering the Internet for The Wall Street Journal.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s from Feb. 12, 1998&#8211;yes, that means Rob and I are genuine Web antiques&#8211;and focuses on Glaser&#8217;s decidedly complicated relationship with his former employer, Microsoft (MSFT).</p>
<p>As you will see, it comes from a much different era of the Internet, when Microsoft was much scarier, RealNetworks represented innovation and the medium was still in its infancy. My favorite line is a description of Glaser as &#8220;radiating so much intensity that his face resembles a clenched fist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here it is:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>Rob Glaser learned the software business as one of Bill Gates&#8217;s most aggressive proteges at Microsoft Corp. So he knows all too well the anguishing strategic decision that most software entrepreneurs inevitably confront: Go head-to-head against Mr. Gates and risk annihilation. Or cooperate with him&#8211;and risk annihilation.</p>
<p>Now an Internet entrepreneur himself, Mr. Glaser thinks he has another strategy: A delicate dance with Microsoft that combines a little bit of competition and a little bit of cooperation.</p>
<p>His newly public company, RealNetworks Inc., popularized the use of realtime audio and video on the Internet&#8217;s World Wide Web. It already has more than 18 million registered users of its free &#8220;streaming&#8221; software for receiving multimedia over the Net. It also has a rapidly growing business selling server software for transmitting audio and video to Website operators.</p>
<p>But it stands squarely in the path of the strategy that has drawn Microsoft into trouble with antitrust regulators: Emulating innovative products, integrating them into its operating systems and then giving them away free. RealNetworks&#8217; daunting task is to prove it can do a better job of outmaneuvering Microsoft than Netscape Communications Inc., the browser pioneer whose market share and profitability have been devastated by Microsoft&#8217;s integration strategy.</p>
<p>Mr. Glaser insists he and the software giant can coexist. &#8220;I learned an amazing amount from Bill,&#8221; he says, speaking in staccato bursts and radiating so much intensity that his face resembles a clenched fist. &#8220;We knew we could either compete head-on like Netscape or do something a lot more interesting.&#8221;</p>
<p>His strategy is known internally as &#8220;coopetition.&#8221; Out of mistrust, Netscape two years ago rejected an unsolicited offer from Microsoft to become a partner and investor. But Mr. Glaser approached his former colleagues last summer seeking just such an alliance. In July, he sold a nonvoting 10% stake to Microsoft for $30 million, and licensed RealNetworks&#8217; technology to the software giant for another $30 million. Microsoft also agreed to bundle RealNetworks&#8217; software with Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>In making the deal, Mr. Glaser helped himself to Microsoft&#8217;s cash and prestige and calculated that Microsoft wouldn&#8217;t consider streaming technology to be as strategic to its future as the browser.</p>
<p>&#8220;What we were trying to do in the partnership is to set it up so that our success would not disadvantage their core business,&#8221; Mr. Glaser says. &#8220;Microsoft is a very paranoid company and so we have tried to create an environment where while they might be covetous of some of our success, analytically they would not fear it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The deal gave Mr. Gates the opportunity, if he so desired, to clone RealNetworks&#8217; products during the period when they were licensed to Microsoft. &#8220;There&#8217;s no question they could use our own technology to become extremely vigorous competitors and try to put us out of business,&#8221; says James Breyer, a director and member of Accel Partners, a venture-capital firm that helped finance RealNetworks.</p>
<p>So Mr. Glaser needs to stay ahead of Microsoft by rapidly improving his software, accumulating enough customers to become the standard for sending audio and video over the Internet and diversifying into related businesses.</p>
<p>Last month, for example, he announced an agreement with one of Microsoft&#8217;s archrivals, Sun Microsystems Inc., to finetune his software to perform better on Sun&#8217;s popular Internet servers than on Windows-based servers.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are neither friend nor foe, but Microsoft is most certainly the environment we live in,&#8221; says Mr. Glaser, now 36 years old. &#8220;It&#8217;s how we work within that environment that will make all the difference.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Glaser&#8217;s own personality seems suited to the relationship&#8217;s contradictions. He has been a committed liberal since his days at Yale University, where he wrote a column called &#8220;What&#8217;s Left&#8221; for the student newspaper. He initially named his company Progressive Networks to reflect his politics. And he donated 700,000 RealNetworks shares to causes related to freedom of speech and environmental issues after the public offering, and promises to contribute 5% of the company&#8217;s future profits as well.</p>
<p>But he became a notoriously hardcharging and sometimes arrogant manager after he joined Microsoft in 1983, at the age of 21. Some colleagues dubbed him a &#8220;screamer.&#8221; When deadlines approached for projects, several former colleagues at Microsoft say he became increasingly revved-up, downing one Diet Coke after another and erupting at even tiny mistakes. &#8220;My intensity sometimes manifested itself in less positive ways,&#8221; Mr. Glaser concedes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Like Microsoft, Rob was smart, young, perhaps a little hard to take, and convinced he was absolutely right about a lot of stuff,&#8221; recalls Mike Slade, a friend of Mr. Glaser&#8217;s at Microsoft who now runs an Internet publishing company, Starwave Corp. &#8220;But that was what was rewarded at the company and everything was going too fast there for a lot of management training.&#8221;</p>
<p>The pace did take its toll. Even though Mr. Glaser rose to become vice president of multimedia systems and one of Mr. Gates&#8217;s favorites, his last years at Microsoft were rocky. Some at the company point to an internal power struggle with Microsoft&#8217;s head of technology, Nathan Myhrvold. &#8220;They both wanted to be Bill&#8217;s boy genius and visionary for the company,&#8221; says a colleague. &#8220;Obviously, Nathan won.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Glaser dismisses tales of infighting, blaming his departure on a diminishing feeling of &#8220;joy&#8221; in his work. &#8220;I began to think that Bill had the best job of all,&#8221; he says. In 1993, at the age of 31, he resigned, with about $15 million of stock in his pocket.</p>
<p>His retirement didn&#8217;t last long. Soon after, he saw a version of the Mosaic browser, the first graphical interface software for navigating the Web. He had an epiphany, he says, realizing that the Internet could eventually become a major purveyor of audio and video.</p>
<p>Mr. Glaser sank about $1 million of his own money into a start-up that would first produce software for compressing and transmitting sound. With additional funding from friends, such as Lotus founder Mitch Kapor, RealAudio 1.0 quickly made its debut in April 1995.</p>
<p>RealAudio was greeted with more than a little disdain from the Internet elite because it was a tinny and unsatisfying experience for most users. But it gave the Internet a voice, and Mr. Glaser kept plugging away, improving fidelity and striking deals with more content providers to use it on their Web sites. The hook: Free player software for consumers.</p>
<p>He is attempting to repeat the process with RealVideo. It currently provides small, jerky moving pictures but will, he believes, someday transform the Internet as data transmission speeds increase. In a recent demo of the player, Mr. Glaser selected a music video by the languid singer Jewel, he joked, &#8220;because she doesn&#8217;t move around too much.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Microsoft has been developing its own Media Player and NetShow streaming software, partly with technology acquired by purchasing VXtreme, a RealNetworks competitor.</p>
<p>The Microsoft products are now free. But the company may decide to charge for the latest version of NetShow coming out this year, which would be good for RealNetworks. Meanwhile, Microsoft will continue to bundle RealNetworks&#8217; player software with the Microsoft browser, also good for RealNetworks. And the day after RealNetworks&#8217; Sun deal, Microsoft announced an agreement to make its own Media Player compatible with RealNetworks&#8217; server software, yet another positive development for RealNetworks.</p>
<p>&#8220;The user only wants it to work,&#8221; says Rich Tong, a Microsoft marketing vice president. &#8220;So it is good business to work with RealNetworks to set standards for compatibility and expand the market for all of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Skeptics assert that RealNetworks has forged only a temporary truce with Microsoft. Like Netscape, it must continually confront the challenge of trying to make money on technology that Microsoft gives away. RealNetworks charges $29.95 for an enhanced version of the player it gives away free, and $695 and up for its most powerful server software.</p>
<p>Some large companies are snapping the products up. Mercedes Benz, Eastman Kodak and Lockheed Martin are buying RealNetworks&#8217; latest software, RealSystem 5.0, to bring their internal networks to life. Boeing Co., for example, uses RealNetworks&#8217; software to communicate with employees world-wide and conduct training sessions. A variety of media concerns such as Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, the Public Broadcasting System, AOL, Fox News&#8217;s 24-hour newsfeed and Paramount Pictures use it as well.</p>
<p>Mr. Glaser recently cut a deal with Macromedia Inc., the largest provider of animation-editing software, to transmit animated material over the Internet. RealNetworks is also operating multimedia Web sites for other companies, and has a joint venture with MCI Communications Corp. to create a broadcast network on the Web.</p>
<p>All these initiatives are running up big bills. Earlier this month, RealNetworks reported that revenue more than doubled for 1997, to $32.7 million from $14 million the year before. But heavy research and development spending tripled losses to $11.2 million, or 40 cents a share, from $3.8 million, or 14 cents a share. The company&#8217;s high costs, plus the looming threat of Microsoft, have depressed the stock, which hovers at around $16 a share, only slightly above the $12.50 a share it opened at when it went public in November.</p>
<p>But Mr. Glaser exudes confidence. His intense personality seems calmer these days. Once divorced, he now has a steady girlfriend and is traveling more frequently, including a summer trip to New Zealand, Australia and French Polynesia, where he made the decision to take RealNetworks public. His 13.5 million shares are worth $218.5 million. And he thinks he has Microsoft figured out. &#8220;People in Silicon Valley see things unnecessarily in black and white: You either hate Microsoft or you are a vassal of them. I am saying there is a third way.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100114/boomtowns-1998-rob-glaser-profile-a-web-pioneer-does-a-delicate-dance-with-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Service to Make 401(k) Tweaking a Piece of Cake</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090819/a-service-to-make-401k-tweaking-a-piece-of-cake/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090819/a-service-to-make-401k-tweaking-a-piece-of-cake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cake Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cake Premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment portfolio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money market fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090819/a-service-to-make-401k-tweaking-a-piece-of-cake/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cake Premium may be a helpful tool in confusing times. But its limitations make it an incomplete solution that's no threat to a really good, honest investment adviser, writes Walt Mossberg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the current economic turmoil, with investment portfolios melting in value, it&#8217;s become harder than ever to plan for retirement. Many people lack good investment advisers, or the time and skill to do their own investment research.</p>
<p>So, a small San Francisco company, Cake Financial, is introducing Thursday a $99-a-year automated service that attempts to tailor a mutual-fund portfolio that will get you to retirement according to your goals. It&#8217;s designed to be simple, clear and relatively quick, using plain English, easy-to-understand graphics, and a step-by-step approach that walks you through the process. In essence, it&#8217;s a robotic, low-cost investment adviser.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=43885A94-FE3B-4BF9-A066-8F53942ECA24&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={43885A94-FE3B-4BF9-A066-8F53942ECA24}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>The service, called Cake Premium, automatically imports your investment and 401(k) account information from any of 65 major investment companies, analyzes and categorizes your holdings, and then proposes how best to reallocate your positions. It uses its own proprietary formula to rate funds, both on their performance and on their fees, and suggests substitutes that it believes would be better.</p>
<p>This new Premium service evolved from two earlier Cake products, a free investment-tracking service and a $30-a-year service comparing mutual funds. Both products emphasized social networking among active investors. But the new Premium version goes much further in terms of recommendations, is aimed at average folks and doesn&#8217;t focus on the social networking. Like the others, it&#8217;s Web-based and runs in all the major browsers.</p>
<p>Cake (<a href="http://cakefinancial.com">cakefinancial.com</a>) isn&#8217;t a registered adviser or broker, and doesn&#8217;t actually conduct any transactions. So, if you choose to follow its advice, you&#8217;ll have to buy or sell the necessary funds elsewhere. The company says it doesn&#8217;t receive commissions or fees, and has no financial ties to any mutual-fund company, bank or broker. It says its income from Cake Premium comes solely from consumer subscription fees.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing Cake Premium, using a dummy portfolio provided by the company. Because I am not an investment expert, I can&#8217;t evaluate the merit of Cake&#8217;s recommendations. You may want to ask a trusted adviser about that after test-driving it via Cake&#8217;s 30-day free trial. But I can say that I found the service clear and easy to use, and can see how it could be helpful to average people with limited time and knowledge. However, I also found that Cake Premium has some significant limitations.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it works. After you enter a few basic facts, like age and desired retirement date, you tell the service your login information for your retirement account, such as a 401(k). But it won&#8217;t work if your account isn&#8217;t at a major investment firm like Fidelity or Schwab (SCHW). And you can&#8217;t manually enter your data from an account that isn&#8217;t covered. The company assures users this is all done very securely.</p>
<p>Next, Cake Premium will assess the mix of mutual funds you hold, and decide if that mix matches your goal. It rates each fund, categorizes them by type, and then labels your current strategy by degree of risk. For example, it might tell you that your current holdings are &#8220;moderately aggressive&#8221; or &#8220;conservative.&#8221; It might also tell you &#8220;you are paying way too much in fees.&#8221; All of this is displayed in very clear text and graphs.</p>
<p>Then, it makes an overall judgment. In my case, Cake Premium declared that the investments in my test account weren&#8217;t properly diversified and represented the wrong level of risk for my situation.</p>
<p>Finally, the service will suggest a new allocation of funds, propose you substitute some funds with others it considers better, and present you with a detailed listing of which ones to sell and which to buy—naming specific funds. You can, at any time, alter Cake Premium&#8217;s proposals to see how your chances of meeting your goals will change, and you can do the same by adjusting a few factors like when you might retire and what percentage of current income you&#8217;d need.</p>
<p>But what about those limitations? For one thing, the service is focused only on mutual funds, and can&#8217;t give you advice about CDs or money-market funds. Also, it is all about retirement, not other goals, like saving for college.</p>
<p>And unlike a good investment adviser, Cake Premium learns only a portion of your financial picture, so its mutual-fund recommendations aren&#8217;t made in a complete context. For instance, it includes only a single small box into which you can type a total of your other assets. The company says it plans a more detailed information-entry process in future versions.</p>
<p>Finally, a maddening problem: If you are trying to reallocate the mutual funds in a 401(k) plan, Cake Premium isn&#8217;t smart enough to limit itself to suggesting substitutes that are actually available in your plan. It may in fact suggest only alternative funds that your plan doesn&#8217;t offer. The company suggests you purchase such funds for a separate account, like an individual retirement account.</p>
<p>Overall, Cake Premium may be a helpful tool in confusing times. But its limitations make it an incomplete solution that&#8217;s no threat to a really good, honest investment adviser.</p>
<p class="tagline">Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090819/a-service-to-make-401k-tweaking-a-piece-of-cake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slide&#039;s Max Levchin Talks About Web 2.0, Redux!</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090720/slides-max-levchin-talks-about-web-20-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090720/slides-max-levchin-talks-about-web-20-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Levchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superpoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=16021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost two years ago, just as Web 2.0 was heating up, BoomTown did a video interview with Slide founder and CEO Max Levchin.

Soon after, the popular maker of widgets and other social networking applications grabbed a big pile of cash from new investors, which put the value of the company at $550 million.

But that was before the recession hit, as well as a generally more sober outlook for a lot of high-flying Silicon Valley darlings like Slide, which have had to wise up a little and get down to business.

So, it was time for another chat with Levchin to find out what's what.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/slide_logo.png"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/slide_logo.png" alt="slide_logo" title="slide_logo" width="207" height="100" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16022" /></a></p>
<p>Almost two years ago, just as Web 2.0 was heating up, BoomTown <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070917/kara-visits-slides-max-levchin-part-1/">did a three-part interview with Slide founder and CEO Max Levchin</a>.</p>
<p>Soon after, the popular maker of social networking applications, often called widgets, grabbed a big pile of cash from new investors&#8211;$50 million from Fidelity and T. Rowe Price&#8211;which put the value of the company at $550 million.</p>
<p>So, it was high-time for another visit to see him, especially after the recent recession has forced a lot of high-flying Silicon Valley darlings like Slide to wise up a little and get down to business.</p>
<p>That has meant tightening up costs, abandoning some business plans and drilling down on others.</p>
<p>Previously, Slide’s financial strategy had included making money from selling premium versions of its software, as well as selling advertisers on its large, although disparate, audience with display ads.</p>
<p>Now, says Levchin, it is still about premium products, but also about selling a brand &#8220;experience&#8221; rather than less effective and increasingly commoditized network-style advertising.</p>
<p>The products have also evolved, although Slide still essentially makes a wide range of innovative widgets that have been attracting many millions of users each. They include everything from slide shows to a software program called SuperPoke that allows a user to poke another in a super way.</p>
<p>A lot of Slide&#8217;s initial growth had been through taking advantage of the popularity of MySpace and Facebook.</p>
<p>But, since then, the company has been trying to be a kind of distributed content and application company that is not wholly dependent on large platforms.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video of my interview with Levchin at Slide&#8217;s new HQ in San Francisco:</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=CC6970B9-9E53-42A4-A4CA-64D3232A1AC1&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={CC6970B9-9E53-42A4-A4CA-64D3232A1AC1}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090720/slides-max-levchin-talks-about-web-20-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Max Levchin on Slide&#039;s $500 Million Valuation and Other Widgety Issues</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Levchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the noise about Microsoft's $41 billion offer to buy Yahoo, I dropped the ball on posting about a chat I had about a week ago with Slide's Max Levchin about the recent $50 million investment that valued the widget maker at an astonishing $500 million.

To say I was dumbstruck by the market value, given that the profitless start-up has only about $10 million to $12 million in annual revenue and a still unproven business plan, would be wrong.

Incredulous, yes. Gobsmacked, indeed. Feeling like I was back in 1999, most definitely. But not dumbstruck!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/02/372900403_06e6fb49ca.jpg' width='190' height='200' alt='levchin' /></p>
<p>With all the noise about Microsoft&#8217;s $41 billion offer to buy Yahoo, I dropped the ball on posting about a chat I had about a week ago with Slide&#8217;s Max Levchin (pictured here) about the recent $50 million investment that valued the widget maker at an astonishing $500 million.</p>
<p>To say I was dumbstruck by the market value, given that the profitless start-up has only about $10 million to $12 million in annual revenue and a still unproven business plan, would be wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080118/slip-sliding-into-a-fortune/">Incredulous</a>, yes. <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080124/all-hail-the-maxist-revolution/">Gobsmacked</a>, indeed. Feeling like I was back in 1999, most definitely. But not dumbstruck!</p>
<p>Thus, I queried the always voluble Levchin, who agreed to talk to me readily (no Jerry-Yang-cave-dwelling behavior for this 32-year-old Web 2.0 serial entrepreneur!) about the investment by two old-line institutional investors&#8211;Fidelity and T. Rowe Price&#8211;and its implications for Slide.</p>
<p><span id="more-67691"></span></p>
<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/02/slide_logo_sm.gif' alt='slide' class='alignleft'/></p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re like a teen in our clock cycle,&#8221; said Levchin about what he thinks the money means to Slide. &#8220;Now, we have to figure out how do you get a job and work in the real world.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s juicy quotes like this that make it easy to see why the young geek&#8211;whose last score was PayPal, which was sold to eBay for $1.54 billion&#8211;has become such a press darling, especially combined with his restlessly complex mind, curious intellect and a much longer view than your average dot-com entrepreneur.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why it sometimes feels effortless to start shaking your head in rapt agreement, even if you don&#8217;t agree at all, as he laid out the reasoning behind his contention that Slide and its giant bag of cash will now emerge from puberty fully mature.</p>
<p>This, despite the lack of profits in the here and now, which Levchin did not dispute. &#8220;We could start to turn toward profitability with not too much of a stretch,&#8221; he said, with a strong trace of his Ukrainian roots in his stilted speech patterns that make him sound a bit like a robot.</p>
<p>Instead, Levchin said he was more interested in the opportunities that he saw emerging for Slide&#8211;which has grown to almost 150 million monthly visitors and several billion monthly page views, by offering to consumers its range of software to make slide shows, engage in SuperPokes and do other often pointless widgety things.</p>
<p>&#8220;We were [operating] super-thin, but with a whole lot of ideas, so we had to prioritize what we had to do,&#8221; said Levchin, who said he did not plan to raise more money until recently. &#8220;We later brought up to the board that we were seeing all this growth in places.&#8221;</p>
<p>That was true on social-networking sites like MySpace and Facebook, where Slide was grabbing enormous growth, although Levchin has been trying to aim future increases off those platforms to other social networks like Bebo and Hi5, as well as internationally on its own.</p>
<p>To do that required money and lots of it, and from non-VC investors to give it more credibility beyond the bubbly go-go tone of Silicon Valley.</p>
<p>So using Allen and Co., a well-connected New York investment firm, Slide grabbed a pair of firms that reeked institutional, Fidelity and T.Rowe Price, which Slide still does not name.</p>
<p>&#8220;I thought it was best to raise money from people people who invest for a living and have some combination of risk-taking and knowledge,&#8221; said Levchin, who later noted that he would have thought the investment was frothy, if he could not convince anyone but VCs to hand over cash at the lofty $500 million valuation.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think it was flattering that these were not jokers,&#8221; said Levchin of his new investors.</p>
<p>He said he stopped potential laughing by unveiling a steady pipeline of revenue from sponsorships, impressions and clicks of all kinds.</p>
<p>More importantly, he noted, he began to outline a new way of reaching consumers more efficiently that was &#8220;not the bleak world of brand advertising.&#8221; Still, that does mean more consumer brand links, like the one Slide made this week with Kodak to make it easy for users to move around their photos.</p>
<p>But the heart of Slide&#8217;s promise, like a lot of socially oriented Web companies, lies in manipulating the information it is collecting from consumers. That essentially means using an intense version of e-metrics&#8211;data of when, how, where and why consumers click on things.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s no surprise that we are mathematical &#8230; and we study data carefully,&#8221; said Levchin. &#8220;We&#8217;re building a predictive model that is close to perfect &#8230; where we can say what the revenue per user will be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, we&#8217;ll see about that&#8211;along with obvious privacy issues, the jury is still out on the effectiveness of social networking and its payoff, and also on how spammy such advertising can become. Last week, for example, Google blamed its weakness in its recent quarter on lack of progress in monetizing these platforms.</p>
<p>In an article in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120217154978142763.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">The Wall Street Journal today</a>, for example, Kevin Delaney noted: &#8220;Since advertising on social-networking and video-sharing sites is still largely experimental for marketers, it could be more vulnerable in an ad-spending pullback.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus, Levchin&#8217;s investors are betting Slide will surmount those challenges.</p>
<p>Happily, he discounted any revenues that Slide has made selling ads to other widget companies to improve their rank on sites like Facebook.</p>
<p>In fact, Levchin agreed that it was a bit of a &#8220;Ponzi scheme&#8221; and not a big part of Slide&#8217;s future. &#8220;It&#8217;s a little business that is going to go away,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Levchin hopes, of course, that does not describe Slide, which he has said he wants to get to a $2 billion valuation, somewhat based on his last experience at PayPal.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have said I have a chip on my shoulder and that it is PayPal-motivated &#8230; but I have no black line in the sand about it,&#8221; said Levchin. &#8220;But I do want to see that I can do it again&#8230;Call it obsession, call it megalomania, but I am definitely not crazy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, of all the players in this trip down the rabbit hole, Levchin is probably the most sane of all. After all, he&#8217;s got the money in the bank.</p>
<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/02/alice-in-front-of-rabbit-hole.jpg' width='380' height='313' class='centered' alt='alice' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080205/max-levchin-on-slides-500-million-valuation-and-other-widgety-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slip-Sliding Into a Fortune</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080118/slip-sliding-into-a-fortune/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080118/slip-sliding-into-a-fortune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BlueRun Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founders Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khosla Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Levchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayfield Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RockYou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T. Rowe Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widget]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080118/slip-sliding-into-a-fortune/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Bubble Time! As BoomTown broke the news in its post earlier today, Slide grabbed a big pile of cash from new investors&#8211;$50 million from Fidelity and T. Rowe Price&#8211;which puts the value of the company at $550 million. In our post, we said the San Francisco start-up, whose widgets are among the most popular [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2007/08/slide_logo_tagline.gif' alt='slide' /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s Bubble Time!</p>
<p>As BoomTown broke the news in its <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080118/slide-gets-big-funding/">post earlier today</a>, Slide grabbed a big pile of cash from new investors&#8211;$50 million from Fidelity and T. Rowe Price&#8211;which puts the value of the company at $550 million.</p>
<p>In our post, we said the San Francisco start-up, whose widgets are among the most popular on Facebook and MySpace, was completing a round of funding that could value it at many times a multiple of its most recent $60 million to $80 million valuation.</p>
<p>The investment from the pair of private equity funds gives them a 9% stake in the maker of widgets and other social-networking applications.</p>
<p>Allen &#038; Co., the media-connected New York-based investment firm, helped Slide execs in raising the latest round.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t think we did not notice that the venture investors already in Slide did not pony up more funds at this&#8211;let&#8217;s just say it, shall we?&#8211;crazy valuation.</p>
<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2008/01/kool-aidman.jpg' alt='kool-aid' class='centered'/></p>
<p>But it is noticeable that such mainstream investors are jumping into the giant pool of Kool-Aid that the social-networking industry has been swimming in over the last year.</p>
<p>Slide&#8217;s last round&#8211;an investment of $20 million&#8211;took place in November of 2006 with investors that included Khosla Ventures, BlueRun Ventures, Founders Fund and the Mayfield Fund.</p>
<p>So Slide&#8217;s investors, of course, were smart to get in on the ground floor to take advantage of the bubble that is expanding at alarming rates.</p>
<p>The ground-zero of that trend came when Facebook got a $240 million investment from Microsoft that valued the company at $15 billion.</p>
<p>Of course, while garnering revenues, neither Facebook nor Slide has the kind of business yet to deserve being worth this lofty amount, except for the fact that investors are counting in its potential and recent quick growth.</p>
<p>Slide&#8217;s business plan includes making money from selling premium versions of its widgets, as well as selling advertisers on its large, although disparate, audience.</p>
<p>The company calls itself the &#8220;largest personal media network in the world, reaching more than 134 million unique global viewers each month and 30% of the U.S. Internet audience.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the company recently said reports had put that number at 144 million, excluding its 50 million users on Facebook. Its competitors include other widget-makers like <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20071022/kara-visits-the-offices-of-rockyou/">RockYou</a>.</p>
<p>Slide makes a wide range of software, called widgets, that have been attracting many millions of users each. They include everything from slide shows to a program called SuperPoke that allows a user to, well, poke another in a super way.</p>
<p>A lot of Slide&#8217;s current growth has been through taking advantage of the huge spike in users first at MySpace and now at Facebook, which is promising, but also not certain.</p>
<p>To say that we have seen this story of fast growth, insane valuations and then the inevitable drop-off would be an understatement.</p>
<p>But Slide Founder and CEO Max Levchin and his team consider the company to be a new kind of distributed content and application company that is not dependent on large platforms like Facebook and MySpace and has huge potential.</p>
<p>Minor blogging annoyance: Of course, in a fit of pique since we revealed the funding without their help, Slide hand-fed the details of the deal to the New York Times and BusinessWeek, both of which somehow forgot to link to our post that said Slide was landing the deal. (Brad, Sarah: Please, please don&#8217;t tell us you figured it all out on your own this morning over eggs.)</p>
<p>UPDATE: A New York Times deputy tech editor just wrote an email to tell me its reporter already had a &#8220;previously scheduled&#8221; meeting with Slide about the deal&#8211;like I said, hand-fed!&#8211;this morning, which &#8220;inspired&#8221; its post and did not know of BoomTown&#8217;s news of the funding (even though it was up since 12:06 a.m. and noticed by everyone else, including Slide). Also, they had the hand-fed details! They did! I admit it! I went hungry, since I did not agree to an embargo! &#8220;In light of this we didn&#8217;t feel that a link was warranted,&#8221; he wrote me.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re not bizarrely ungenerous like that, so here is the <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/slide-slides-into-some-cash/">link to the New York Times story</a>, in which Slide&#8217;s Levchin said his company makes Facebook and MySpace worth using. (And here is the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2008/tc20080118_811726.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories">BusinessWeek link too</a>.)</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s impossible for social networks focused on scaling the network itself to build all the niche applications that bring people and keep people on these sites,” Levchin said, noting Slide widgets &#8220;add the bulk of perceived value to the consumers of these Web platforms.&#8221;</p>
<p>He also said he would use the money to expand its repertoire, but said Slide would try to develop in-house.</p>
<p>But others close to Slide said this was not exactly so, and that the company would also look around for good acquisition targets, using stakes in the newly valued Slide as currency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080118/slip-sliding-into-a-fortune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

