<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; financial results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/financial-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Time to Start Looking for a Buyer, Palm?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100225/palm-agonistes/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100225/palm-agonistes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash equivalents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Rubinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shortfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=35589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for Palm’s big recovery. This morning, the company lowered its fiscal-year revenue forecast and warned of a grotesque 30 percent shortfall in its current quarter. Palm expects third-quarter revenue to be between $285 million and $310 million--significantly less than the $425.4 million analysts had been expecting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/Pre_python1-150x150.jpg" alt="Pre_python" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-25306" />So much for Palm’s big recovery. This morning, the company lowered its fiscal-year revenue forecast and warned of a grotesque 30 percent shortfall in its current quarter. </p>
<p>Palm (PALM) expects third-quarter revenue to be between $285 million and $310 million&#8211;significantly less than the $425.4 million analysts had been expecting. As a result, revenue for the fiscal year will be &#8220;well below&#8221; the $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion the company had projected.</p>
<p>Damn. Puts a new spin on that <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100211/palm-otr/">Chinese New Year smartphone production respite</a> we heard about earlier this month, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Clearly, <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2010/02/24/palm-sales-well-short-of-targets-at-verizon-canaccord-says/">concerns about declining sales of the company&#8217;s webOS smartphones</a> were well-founded. It now seems there&#8217;s a growing possibility they may not reach critical mass. Which is obviously worrisome because Palm has essentially bet the farm on them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Palm webOS is recognized as a groundbreaking platform that enables one of the best smartphone experiences available today, and our work to evolve the platform and bring industry-leading technology to market continues. However, driving broad consumer adoption of Palm products is taking longer than we anticipated,&#8221; Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein said in a statement. &#8220;Our carrier partners remain committed, and we are working closely with them to increase awareness and drive sales of our differentiated Palm products.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rubinstein&#8217;s reassurances have done little to temper investor disgust over the company&#8217;s news. At $6.68, Palm shares are down more than 17 percent as I write this. </p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s time for Palm to start looking for a buyer, whether <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091203/want-to-be-relevant-again-nokia-buy-palm/">Nokia</a> (NOK), <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090130/should-have-bought-palm-when-it-had-the-chance-dell/">Dell</a> (DELL) or someone else. Not that these companies are interested. For Palm to be a good acquisition target, it needs to demonstrate viability, something it&#8217;s obviously having trouble doing. </p>
<p>Below, Palm&#8217;s press release detailing today&#8217;s ugly news.</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ:PALM) today indicated that it expects that revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 will be in the range of $285 million to $310 million on a GAAP basis and in the range of $300 million to $320 million on a non-GAAP basis. Revenues for the quarter and full year are being impacted by slower than expected consumer adoption of the company&#8217;s products that has resulted in lower than expected order volumes from carriers and the deferral of orders to future periods. Accordingly, Palm expects fiscal year 2010 revenues to be well below its previously forecasted range of $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion. The company will provide more detail on its financial results during Palm&#8217;s third-quarter financial results conference call currently scheduled for Thursday, March 18.</p>
<p>&#8220;Palm webOS is recognized as a groundbreaking platform that enables one of the best smartphone experiences available today, and our work to evolve the platform and bring industry-leading technology to market continues. However, driving broad consumer adoption of Palm products is taking longer than we anticipated,&#8221; said Jon Rubinstein, chairman and chief executive officer. &#8220;Our carrier partners remain committed, and we are working closely with them to increase awareness and drive sales of our differentiated Palm products.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Company expects to close its third fiscal quarter with a cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments balance in excess of $500 million.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100225/palm-agonistes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Revenue Up 14 Percent in Second Quarter</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100128/microsoft-reports-record-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100128/microsoft-reports-record-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deferred revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diluted earnins per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings per share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global workforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating expense guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top-line growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7 Upgrade option Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=33781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporting second-quarter earnings in January 2009, Microsoft--beaten down by the worst PC market in several years--announced the first mass layoffs in the its 35-year history. Ugly times. But what a difference a year makes. Microsoft just reported earnings for its second fiscal quarter, posting significant gains in sales and profits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/ballmer-jump.jpg" alt="" title="ballmer-jump" width="175" height="149" class="alignright size-full wp-image-33784" />Reporting <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090122/microsoft-earnings-and-revenues-take-a-big-hit-5000-to-be-laid-off/">second-quarter earnings in January 2009</a>, Microsoft&#8211;beaten down by the worst PC market in several years&#8211;announced the first mass layoffs in the its 35-year history. Five thousand employees, or 5.5 percent of the company’s global workforce, were to be sacked as the company steeled itself against further deterioration in the economy.</p>
<p>Ugly times. But what a difference a year makes.</p>
<p>Microsoft (MSFT) just reported earnings for its second fiscal quarter, posting significant gains in sales and profits. Net income for the period rose to $6.66 billion, or 74 cents a share, from $4.17 billion, or 47 cents a share in the same period last year. Meanwhile, revenue rose 14 percent to $19.02 billion. Analysts had been expecting earnings of 59 cents a share, and $17.9 billion in revenue.</p>
<p>&#8220;Exceptional demand for Windows 7 led to the positive top-line growth for the company,&#8221; <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2010/jan10/01-28fy10q2earnings.mspx">chief financial officer Peter Klein said in a statement</a>. &#8220;Our continuing commitment to managing costs allowed us to drive earnings performance ahead of the revenue growth.&#8221;</p>
<p>The release below. <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/">Kara Swisher will be covering Microsoft&#8217;s earnings over at BoomTown</a> later this afternoon.</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
<strong>Microsoft Reports Record Second-Quarter Results</strong></p>
<p>REDMOND, Wash., Jan 28, 2010  &#8212; Microsoft Corp. today announced record revenue of $19.02 billion for the second quarter ended Dec. 31, 2009, a 14% increase from the same period of the prior year. Operating income, net income and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $8.51 billion, $6.66 billion and $0.74 per share, which represented increases of 43%, 60% and 57%, respectively, when compared with the prior year period.</p>
<p>These financial results include the recognition of $1.71 billion of deferred revenue, an impact of $0.14 of diluted earnings per share, relating to the Windows 7 Upgrade Option Program and pre-sales of Windows 7 to OEMs and retailers before general availability. Adjusting for the deferred revenue recognition, second-quarter revenue totaled $17.31 billion, and diluted earnings per share totaled $0.60 per share.</p>
<p>&#8220;Exceptional demand for Windows 7 led to the positive top-line growth for the company,&#8221; said Peter Klein, chief financial officer at Microsoft. &#8220;Our continuing commitment to managing costs allowed us to drive earnings performance ahead of the revenue growth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 launched globally on October 22 as anticipated. Through the second quarter, Microsoft has sold over 60 million Windows 7 licenses making it the fastest selling operating system in history.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a record quarter for Windows units,&#8221; said Kevin Turner, chief operating officer at Microsoft. &#8220;We are thrilled by the consumer reception to Windows 7 and by business enthusiasm to adopt Windows 7.&#8221;</p>
<p>Business Outlook</p>
<p>Management will discuss second-quarter results and the company&#8217;s business outlook on a conference call and webcast at 2:30 p.m. PST (5:30 p.m. EST) today.</p>
<p>In addition, Microsoft offers operating expense guidance of $26.2 billion to $26.5 billion, for the full year ending June 30, 2010.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100128/microsoft-reports-record-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Blowout Quarter for Apple</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100125/apple-earnings-3/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100125/apple-earnings-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after the bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approved device list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Unicom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer satisfaction survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diluted earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international locations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdeliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underpromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit growth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=33395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A subscriber to the underpromise-and-overdeliver school of guidance theory, Apple is reknowned for issuing almost comically conservative revenue outlooks and then exceeding them. And this quarter was no different. Reporting earnings after the bell Monday, Apple posted a fiscal first-quarter profit of $3.38 billion on revenue that rose 32 percent to $15.68 billion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/steve-jobs-money.jpg"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/steve-jobs-money-228x300.jpg" alt="" title="steve-jobs-money" width="228" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-33396" /></a>A subscriber to the underpromise-and-overdeliver school of guidance theory, Apple is reknowned for issuing almost comically conservative revenue outlooks and then exceeding them. </p>
<p>This quarter was no different. <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000119312510012085/d10q.htm">Reporting earnings after the bell Monday</a>, Apple (AAPL) posted a fiscal first-quarter profit of $3.38 billion on revenue that rose 32 percent to $15.68 billion. That far exceeded analysts&#8217; forecasts of $12.1 billion.</p>
<p>It was the company&#8217;s all-time highest revenue and profit.</p>
<p>Apple sold 3.36 million Macs during the quarter&#8211;33 percent more than it sold a year ago. And the company sold 8.7 million iPhones. That&#8217;s 100 percent unit growth over the year-ago quarter, but a bit fewer than the 9.1 million The Street had been expecting. IPod sales topped out at 21 million, an eight percent unit decline from last year.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are very pleased to have generated $5.8 billion in cash during the quarter,&#8221; Apple COO Peter Oppenheimer said in a <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/01/25results.html">press release issued with the results</a>. &#8220;Looking ahead to the second fiscal quarter of 2010, we expect revenue in the range of about $11.0 billion to $11.4 billion and we expect diluted earnings per share in the range of about $2.06 to $2.18.&#8221;</p>
<p>And in a nod to the company&#8217;s special event this Wednesday, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said, &#8220;The new products we are planning to release this year are very strong, starting this week with a major new product that we&#8217;re really excited about.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>NOTES FROM THE EARNINGS CALL</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Apple saw killer Mac sales this quarter, beating its previous record set in the September quarter by &#8220;over 300,000,&#8221; Oppenheimer reported.</li>
<li> The company sold almost 21 million &#8220;traditional&#8221; iPods, compared with sales of 22.7 million a year ago. Oppenheimer said that decline was expected and was offset by the 55 percent year-over-year growth in sales of the iPod touch, which increased ASP and revenue. </li>
<li> Apple now has iPhone distribution in 86 countries.</li>
<li>The company expects to open 45 to 50 stores in fiscal 2010. Half will be in international locations.</li>
<li>Enterprise demand for the iPhone is increasing. &#8220;Business customers have ranked iPhone the number 1 smartphone in the J.D. Power customer satisfaction survey for the second year in a row,&#8221; Oppenheimer reported. &#8220;And we have continued to see a rapidly growing number of CIOs who have added iPhone to their approved device list.&#8221; </li>
<li>As a result of the new accounting standards Apple has adopted, financial results of each quarter from fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2009 have been revised. </li>
<li>COO Tim Cook on issues with AT&#038;T&#8217;s (T) network and how its bad press affects Apple: AT&#038;T is a great partner. You know, we’ve been working with them since before the first iPhone. In the vast majority of locations, they provide a great experience. But there have been issues in some cities. They have acknowledged this and developed a plan to make things better and we have personally reviewed them. Cook added that he has &#8220;very high confidence&#8221; AT&#038;T will resolve the issues to which he referred.</li>
<li>Cook on the &#8220;major new product&#8221; Jobs hinted at in the company&#8217;s earnings release: &#8220;We have nothing to share today. Please stay tuned.&#8221;</li>
<li> Apple expects to see a sequential decline in Mac sales next quarter, which is &#8220;typical.&#8221; The company expects traditional iPod sales to decrease, potentially even more than in the past.</li>
<li> Earlier this month, Apple passed 200,000 for the number of iPhones activated in China. Cook: &#8220;We’re happy with China Unicom.&#8221;</li>
<li>Tim Cook to an analyst digging for details about the company&#8217;s upcoming product announcement: &#8220;I wouldn’t want to take away your joy and surprise on Wednesday when you see our latest creation.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100125/apple-earnings-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm Disappoints</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091217/palm-posts-loss-ships-783000-smartphones/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091217/palm-posts-loss-ships-783000-smartphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting Standards Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjusted gross margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after-hours trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amortization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common stockholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depreciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developer Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBITDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Rubinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-GAAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restructuring charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell-through]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series C preferred shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. deferred tax assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=31029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second-quarter loss Palm reported Thursday afternoon was narrower than the one it reported last year, but still fell far short of what Wall Street had been expecting. The company did manage to ship a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, though, a five percent decrease from last quarter but a year-over-year increase of 41 percent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/images8.jpeg" alt="images" title="images" width="129" height="129" class="alignright size-full wp-image-31031" /></p>
<p>The second-quarter loss Palm reported Thursday afternoon was narrower than the one it reported last year, but still fell far short of what Wall Street had been expecting. The smartphone maker lost 37 cents a share for the period on sales of $302 million. Analysts had been expecting a net loss of 32 cents per share on revenue of $266.2 million. </p>
<p>Palm (PALM) did manage to ship a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, though, a five percent decrease from last quarter, but a year-over-year increase of 41 percent. That said, the company actually sold only 573,000 units, down 29 percent from the previous quarter and down four percent year-over-year. Seems the launch of the Pixi wasn&#8217;t quite as successful as Palm had hoped.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are continuing to execute strongly against our long-term strategy with the delivery of Palm Pixi, the new carrier launches completed this quarter, and the upcoming opening of Palm&#8217;s full developer program,&#8221; said Jon Rubinstein, Palm&#8217;s chairman and chief executive officer. </p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re still in the early stages of a long race,&#8221; Rubinstein added, &#8220;and we&#8217;re energized by the opportunity to compete in this exciting market. We remain confident that Palm&#8217;s innovative product design capabilities, integrated cloud services and the differentiated and delightful Palm webOS experience will provide the foundation for our sustained success.&#8221; </p>
<p>Once again, Palm did not break out unit sales of the Pre or Pixi in its earnings release, below. At $11.26, Palm shares are down 3.92 percent in after-hours trading.</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
<strong>Palm Reports Q2 FY 2010 Results</strong></p>
<p>SUNNYVALE, Calif.&#8211; Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ: PALM) today reported that total revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, ended Nov. 27, 2009, were $78.1 million. Gross profit was $5.5 million, and gross margin was 7.0 percent. These results include the effects of subscription accounting applied to Palm(R) webOS(TM) products as required by GAAP.(1) In accordance with this methodology, revenues and direct cost of revenues for Palm webOS products (currently Palm Pre(TM) and Palm Pixi(TM) smartphones) are deferred and recognized over the products&#8217; estimated economic lives.</p>
<p>To facilitate comparisons to Palm&#8217;s historical results, Palm has included non-GAAP adjusted measures, which exclude the impact of subscription accounting, stock-based compensation and other items detailed later in this release. The company believes this information will help investors better evaluate its current period performance and trends in its business.</p>
<p>Non-GAAP Adjusted Revenues in the second quarter totaled $302.0 million, non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit was $77.3 million and non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin was 25.6 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are continuing to execute strongly against our long-term strategy with the delivery of Palm Pixi, the new carrier launches completed this quarter, and the upcoming opening of Palm&#8217;s full developer program,&#8221; said Jon Rubinstein, Palm&#8217;s chairman and chief executive officer. &#8220;We&#8217;re still in the early stages of a long race, and we&#8217;re energized by the opportunity to compete in this exciting market. We remain confident that Palm&#8217;s innovative product design capabilities, integrated cloud services and the differentiated and delightful Palm webOS experience will provide the foundation for our sustained success.&#8221;</p>
<p>The company shipped a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, representing a 5 percent decrease from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and a year-over-year increase of 41 percent compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Smartphone sell-through for the second quarter was 573,000 units, down 29 percent from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and down 4 percent year-over-year.</p>
<p>On a GAAP basis, net loss applicable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $(85.4) million, or $(0.54) per diluted common share. This compares to a net loss applicable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $(508.6) million or $(4.64) per diluted common share. The company&#8217;s second quarter of fiscal year 2009 results included a non-cash charge with a net impact of $396.7 million to the tax provision pertaining to the increase of the valuation allowance for the Company&#8217;s U.S. deferred tax assets.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s net loss applicable to common stockholders on a GAAP basis reflects accounting guidance, effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which requires the anti-dilutive provisions of Palm&#8217;s series C preferred shares and related warrants to be treated as derivatives for financial reporting purposes. The fair value of the derivatives were estimated as of the first day of fiscal year 2010 and are marked to market on a quarterly basis, with any change in value reflected in the company&#8217;s financial results for the period. The series C derivatives balance was $178.7 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $235.0 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This reduction in fair value resulted in a $56.3 million non-cash gain on series C derivatives and was reflected in the company&#8217;s second quarter GAAP financial results. With regard to the series C derivatives, any future increases in Palm&#8217;s stock price from period to period will be reflected as a non-cash loss on these derivatives in the company&#8217;s financial results, and any future decreases will be reflected as a non-cash gain in the company&#8217;s financial results.</p>
<p>Non-GAAP Net Loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $(59.6) million, or $(0.37) per diluted share. This compares to a non-GAAP Net Loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $(80.2) million, or $(0.73) per diluted share.</p>
<p>Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 totaled $(70.1) million. EBITDA, adjusted to exclude the impact of subscription accounting, stock-based compensation, net other income (expense), restructuring charges and a gain on series C derivatives, or Adjusted EBITDA, totaled $(48.3) million.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments balance was $590.0 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. This includes net proceeds of approximately $360 million from the company&#8217;s public equity offering, which closed on Sept. 23, 2009. Cash from operations for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $16.7 million.</p>
<p>Palm may periodically provide new software features free of charge to customers of its Palm webOS products and currently recognizes Palm webOS product revenues and related standard cost of revenues on a subscription basis based on the applicable product&#8217;s estimated economic life, which is currently 24 months. The company records deferred revenues and deferred cost of revenues on its balance sheet, and amortizes them into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life.</p>
<p>Palm announced today that it expects to early adopt two recently released accounting standards related to revenue recognition, Accounting Standards Update (&#8220;ASU&#8221;) No. 2009-13 and ASU No. 2009-14, effective for its third quarter of fiscal year 2010. These accounting changes will result in a substantial portion of Palm webOS product revenues being recognized upon delivery. The remaining Palm webOS revenues, which are related to future services and deliverables, will be recorded as deferred revenues on the company&#8217;s balance sheet, and amortized into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life, which is currently 24 months. Under the new standards, all related cost of revenues will be recognized upon delivery. This change in accounting will reduce the amount of revenues that Palm will defer on its balance sheet but will have no impact on cash flows and does not change how Palm accounts for Palm OS(R) products, like the Centro(TM), or its Treo(TM) line. Consistent with the company&#8217;s past practice, Palm will continue to provide non-GAAP, adjusted measures that exclude the impact of deferred revenue accounting, stock-based compensation and other items as appropriate.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091217/palm-posts-loss-ships-783000-smartphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Earnings Fall From Ugly Tree, Hit Every Branch on the Way Down</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090514/sony-earnings-fall-from-ugly-tree-hit-every-branch-on-the-way-down/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090514/sony-earnings-fall-from-ugly-tree-hit-every-branch-on-the-way-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akira Amari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chibagin Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy Trade and Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fujio Ando]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Stringer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable music players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About the best thing to be said for Sony’s grotesque financial results is that they came in smaller than expected. The company’s 98.9 billion yen ($1 billion) loss for the fiscal year ended March--its first net loss in 14 years--wasn’t nearly as bad as the 150.0 billion yen ($1.57 billion) figure it had predicted in January or even close to the 173.8 billion yen ($1.8 billion) analysts polled by Thomson Reuters had been forecasting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
&#8220;If we were any more successful, we’d be bankrupt.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<a href="http://d6.allthingsd.com/20080528/stringer/"> Sony CEO Howard Stringer</a> on the company&#8217;s LCD business, May 28, 2008
</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/sony_stringer-250x289.jpg" alt="sony_stringer" title="sony_stringer" width="250" height="289" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-17654" /> About the best thing to be said for <a href="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/08q4_sony.pdf">Sony’s grotesque financial results</a> is that they came in <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sony-reports-first-full-year-loss-in-14-years">smaller than expected</a>. The company’s 98.9 billion yen ($1 billion) loss for the fiscal year ended March&#8211;its first net loss in 14 years&#8211;wasn’t nearly as bad as the 150.0 billion yen ($1.57 billion) figure it had predicted in January or even close to the 173.8 billion yen ($1.8 billion) analysts polled by Thomson Reuters had been forecasting.  And the same is true for Sony’s fourth quarter, as well. The net loss of 165.1 billion yen ($1.7 billion) it reported was far better than the 228.7 billion yen ($2.39 billion) forecast.</p>
<p>Still ugly as hell, though. And according to the company’s leadership, its next fiscal year will be little different. Sony is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=arVJrwoK9lkY">forecasting  a loss of  120 billion yen ($1.2 billion)</a>. Given that unfortunate outlook, Sony (SNE) is closing three factories in Japan, part of an ongoing effort to shore up a business ravaged by the worst recession in decades. But cost-cutting measures like that can only do so much.</p>
<p>As analysts note, what Sony really needs is a killer product. It is no longer the force it once was in consumer electronics, having ceded its dominance in portable music players to Apple (AAPL) and its leads in the television and videogame console markets to Samsung Electronics and Nintendo. “Their outlook gave me the impression that their business is heading for a gradual recovery,&#8221; <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUKT30531220090514?pageNumber=5&#038;virtualBrandChannel=0">Fujio Ando, senior managing director at Chibagin Asset Management, told Reuters</a>. &#8220;But it would all depend on whether they would be able to start producing popular products, because right now they have no &#8216;Number One&#8217; products. I see Sony&#8217;s branding power weakening.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s something of which Sony is painfully aware.</p>
<p>“We have two distinct challenges facing us,” <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090227/all-hail-sir-howard-king-of-sony/">Sony CEO Howard Stringer recently told the New York Times</a>. “The first is the global slowdown, which forces us to make significant adjustments. The second challenge is the evolution of our competitive environment. New competitors [are] springing out everywhere.”</p>
<p>Indeed. And while Sony seems to be meeting the first challenge, albeit slowly, it hasn’t yet begun to make headway toward meeting the second. And at this point, one wonders if the company is even capable anymore. As Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Minister and former Sony employee Akira Amari asked back in October 2006, “What has become of the Sony known for its technology?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090514/sony-earnings-fall-from-ugly-tree-hit-every-branch-on-the-way-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Announces Second-Quarter Disappointment</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080717/goog-5/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080717/goog-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google posted its latest financials Thursday afternoon, and though second-quarter net income rose 35 percent, the company’s results fell short of estimates. Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt described the company’s performance as “another strong quarter, despite a more challenging economic environment.” Sadly, investors didn’t quite see it that way. Shares in the company tanked in after-hours trading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/07/goog.jpg" alt="" title="goog" width="200" height="75" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2805" />Google posted its <a href="http://investor.google.com/releases/2008Q2.html">latest financials</a> Thursday afternoon, and though second-quarter net income rose 35 percent, the company&#8217;s results fell short of estimates. The Internet search sovereign reported net income of $1.25 billion, or $3.92 a share, compared with $925.1 million, or $2.93 a share, a year earlier. Net revenue rose to $3.9 billion. Meanwhile, Google&#8217;s (GOOG) U.S.-paid clicks for the second quarter rose 19 percent from a year earlier, but fell 1 percent from the first quarter.</p>
<p>Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt described the the company&#8217;s performance as &#8220;another strong quarter, despite a more challenging economic environment.&#8221; Sadly, investors didn&#8217;t quite see it that way. Shares in the company tanked in after-hours trading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080717/goog-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

