<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Flip 3D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/flip-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:59:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Parallels Zips Past Fusion in Running Windows on Macs</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100210/parallels-fusion-windows-on-macs/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100210/parallels-fusion-windows-on-macs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boot Camp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flip 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics intensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holiday Product Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels Desktop 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[task bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware Fusion 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/?p=1173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt reviews the latest software for running Windows on a Mac without rebooting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the advantages of the Apple Macintosh is that it&#8217;s the only computer consumers can buy that is able to run both Apple&#8217;s own Mac operating system and Microsoft Windows on the same machine. That means that, if you prefer the Mac environment, but need to run a program only available in Windows, you can do so on the same Mac, and even at the same time.</p>
<p>For instance, while I am writing this column on a Mac laptop in the Mac OS, using the Mac version of Microsoft Word, I am also simultaneously running the latest versions of Internet Explorer and Outlook—which aren&#8217;t available for the Mac—in Windows, on the same machine. I can switch back and forth among these programs with ease.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=076E17C9-2A14-42DD-91E8-7DA8BA4F0880&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={076E17C9-2A14-42DD-91E8-7DA8BA4F0880}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>Now, the two most popular software products for accomplishing this feat, Parallels and VMware Fusion, have been updated to run faster, and to support the latest versions of the two operating systems, Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) Snow Leopard and Microsoft&#8217;s (MSFT) Windows 7. Each costs $80 and requires a Mac running an Intel processor.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been comparing these latest versions, called Parallels Desktop 5 and VMware Fusion 3, using each to run Windows 7 on the same Mac laptop powered by Snow Leopard. My verdict is that, after falling behind Fusion for awhile, Parallels is now the best choice again. In my tests, it proved to be both faster, and more capable of handling the heavy-duty visual effects in Windows 7.</p>
<p>Both programs work by creating a so-called virtual machine—a software version of a physical computer—on the Mac. Inside these faux PCs, you can install any of dozens of operating systems and the applications that run on them. That includes numerous versions of Windows, including Windows XP and Vista, and, now, Windows 7. In order to do this, you will have to buy separately a new, full (not an upgrade) version of Windows, which costs about $200.</p>
<div class="media-CENTER" style="width:360px;"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/OB-FM435_PTECH_G_20100210133003.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="PTECH"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/OB-FM435_PTECH_G_20100210133003.jpg" width="360" height="240" style="float: none;" alt="PTECH" /></a><br />
<br />
VMware Fusion&#8217;s Aero feature with Flip 3D effect</div>
<p>Both programs can run either the full Windows desktop, or individual Windows programs with the desktop hidden. Parallels now comes with a new mode, called Crystal, which integrates the Windows system even more, by placing the Windows Start menu and system tray icons in the Mac&#8217;s own top menu bar.</p>
<p>These virtual-machine programs shouldn&#8217;t be confused with Apple&#8217;s own built-in solution for running Windows on a Mac, called Boot Camp, which also has recently been updated to handle Windows 7. Boot Camp can&#8217;t run the two operating systems simultaneously; you must reboot the computer to switch between them. That gives Windows sole control of the hardware when it&#8217;s running, but many people find Boot Camp inconvenient. I didn&#8217;t test Boot Camp for this review.</p>
<p>Fusion 3, from Silicon Valley company VMware (VMW), is a relatively minor revision. The latest version is mainly designed to add speed, simplify the interface, make it compatible with Snow Leopard and Windows 7, and to improve graphics performance. It achieves most of these goals, but I still found it ran more slowly with Windows 7 than it did with Windows XP. It also was significantly pokier than Parallels 5.</p>
<p>In addition, I found that Fusion had occasional trouble with the transparency effects in Windows 7, such as its ability to turn transparent Windows that are open so you can see your desktop. It also occasionally switched off Windows&#8217; new Aero feature, which offers live previews of task-bar icons. It sometimes turned all my Windows desktop icons white momentarily.</p>
<p>The bigger story is the comeback of Parallels, which is made by a Swiss-based firm of the same name. It was the first virtual-machine program for Intel-based Macs, but got eclipsed by Fusion. Now, the fifth version of Parallels is much faster and much better at the sophisticated graphics upon which Windows 7 relies.</p>
<p>In my tests, on a 2008-vintage MacBook Pro with 4 gigabytes of memory, Parallels 5 started up and had Windows 7 ready to roll nearly two minutes faster than Fusion 3. Windows 7 Home Premium launched from a cold start within Parallels about a minute faster than it did inside Fusion. And, when I restarted Windows 7 with several common programs running, it took two minutes and 23 seconds in Parallels 5, versus over four minutes in Fusion 3.</p>
<p>Beyond that, I found Parallels 5 handled the graphical previews and transparent effects in Windows 7 more quickly and smoothly than Fusion did. The Aero previews of running programs in the task bar appeared more quickly.</p>
<p>Also, I found Parallels 5 played high-definition video in Windows more smoothly than Fusion did. It also seemed to slow down the Mac side of the computer less.</p>
<p>Parallels isn&#8217;t perfect. In particular, it displays a black screen for a bit during start-up, something the company says it hopes to fix. And, while it shares the Mac&#8217;s printer, it confusingly mislabels it.</p>
<p>Neither of these programs is the answer for Mac owners who want to run the latest heavy-duty games or other graphics-intensive programs in Windows 7. For them, I recommend either Boot Camp or a separate Windows PC.</p>
<p>But, if you&#8217;re looking to run typical, everyday Windows programs on a Mac without rebooting, Parallels 5 is now the best solution.</p>
<p class="tagline">Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free of charge, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com/">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100210/parallels-fusion-windows-on-macs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista: Worthy, Largely Unexciting</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20070118/vista-worthy-unexciting/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20070118/vista-worthy-unexciting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antispyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flip 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Basic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidebar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spy Doctor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spy Sweeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20070413/vista-worthy-unexciting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vista is the best version of Windows that Microsoft has produced, Walt Mossberg says. But while navigation has been improved, the successor to XP isn't a breakthrough in ease of use.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new version of Microsoft Windows, the world&#8217;s most popular and important computer operating system, will finally arrive for consumers on Jan. 30. It has taken the giant software maker more than five years to replace Windows XP with this new version, called Windows Vista &#8212; an eternity by computer-industry reckoning. Many of the boldest plans for Vista were discarded in that lengthy process, and what&#8217;s left is a worthy, but largely unexciting, product.</p>
<p>Vista is much prettier than previous versions of Windows. Its icons look better, windows have translucent borders, and items in the taskbar and in folders can display little previews of what they contain. Security is supposedly vastly better; there are some new free, included programs; and fast, universal search is now built in. There are hundreds of other, smaller, improvements and additions throughout the system, including parental controls and even a slicker version of Solitaire.</p>
<p>After months of testing Vista on multiple computers, new and old, I believe it is the best version of Windows that Microsoft has produced. However, while navigation has been improved, Vista isn&#8217;t a breakthrough in ease of use. Overall, it works pretty much the same way as Windows XP. Windows hasn&#8217;t been given nearly as radical an overhaul as Microsoft just applied to its other big product, Office.</p>
<div class="media-LEFT" style="width: 245px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AI050_PTECH_20070117171139.jpg" alt="Photo" height="342" width="245" /><br />Vista&#8217;s Flip 3D feature lets you scroll through images of currently running programs. The sidebar (right) contains miniapplications. The Windows Photo Gallery (left) is for organizing and editing photos.</div>
<p>Nearly all of the major, visible new features in Vista are already available in <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=aapl'>Apple</a>&#8216;s operating system, called Mac OS X, which came out in 2001 and received its last major upgrade in 2005. And Apple is about to leap ahead again with a new version of OS X, called Leopard, due this spring.</p>
<p>There are some big downsides to this new version of Windows. To get the full benefits of Vista, especially the new look and user interface, which is called Aero, you will need a hefty new computer, or a hefty one that you purchased fairly recently. The vast majority of existing Windows PCs won&#8217;t be able to use all of Vista&#8217;s features without major hardware upgrades. They will be able to run only a stripped-down version, and even then may run very slowly.</p>
<p>In fact, in my tests, some elements of Vista could be maddeningly slow even on new, well-configured computers.</p>
<p>Also, despite Vista&#8217;s claimed security improvements, you will still have to run, and keep updating, security programs, which can be annoying and burdensome. Microsoft has thrown in one such program free, but you will have to buy at least one more. That means that, while Vista has eased some of the burden on users imposed by the Windows security crisis, it will still force you to spend more time managing the computer than I believe people should have to devote.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quick guide to the highlights of the new operating system.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Versions and Upgrading</h5>
<p>Vista comes in six versions, two of which are primarily aimed at consumers. One, called Home Premium, is the one most consumers will want. It contains the full Aero interface, and it includes the functionality of Windows Media Center and Windows Tablet edition, which have been discontinued as separate products. Home Premium costs $239, or $159 if you are upgrading from an earlier version of Windows. It will come preloaded on most midrange and some high-end consumer PCs.</p>
<p>The other main consumer edition of Vista is the stripped-down version, called Home Basic. It includes the improved security and search but leaves out the new Aero interface and the Media Center and Tablet functions. It will be preloaded on low-price PCs. Home Basic will cost $199, or $100 for upgraders.</p>
<p>A third version, called Ultimate, will wrap up everything in Home Premium with some additional features from the business versions of Vista. This is for power users, and it is likely to be preloaded on high-end PCs. But some regular users may need Vista Ultimate if their companies have particular network configurations that make it impossible to connect to the company network from home with Home Basic or Home Premium. Vista Ultimate will cost $399, or $259 as an upgrade.</p>
<p>Even if you buy the Home Premium or Ultimate editions, Vista will revert to the Basic features if it detects that your machine is too wimpy to run the new user interface.</p>
<p>For most users who want Vista, I strongly recommend buying a new PC with the new operating system preloaded. I wouldn&#8217;t even consider trying to upgrade a computer older than 18 months, and even some of them may be unsuitable candidates. Microsoft offers a free, downloadable Upgrade Advisor program that can tell you how ready your XP machine is. It&#8217;s available at: <a href="http://microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/upgradeadvisor" rel="external">microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/upgradeadvisor</a>.</p>
<p>If you bought a PC in the past few months, and it had a &#8220;Vista Capable&#8221; sticker on it, it should be able to run at least Home Basic. If it was labeled &#8220;Premium Ready,&#8221; it should be able to handle Premium and probably Ultimate.</p>
<p>Microsoft says that Home Basic can run on a PC with half a gigabyte of memory and that Premium and Ultimate will work on a PC with one gigabyte of memory. I strongly advise doubling those numbers. To get all the features of Vista, you should have two gigabytes of memory, far more than most people own.</p>
<p>Even more important is your graphics card, a component most people know little about. Home Basic can run on almost any graphics system. But Premium and Ultimate will need a powerful, modern graphics system to run well.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Performance</h5>
<p>I tested Vista on three computers. On a new, top-of-the-line <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=hpq'>Hewlett-Packard</a> laptop, with Vista preinstalled, it worked smoothly and quickly. It was a pleasure.</p>
<p>On a three-year-old H-P desktop, a Vista upgrade installed itself fine. But even though this computer had a full gigabyte of memory and what was once a high-end graphics card, Vista Ultimate reverted to the Basic user interface. And even then, it ran so slowly and unsteadily as to make the PC essentially unusable.</p>
<p>The third machine was a new, small Dell XPS M1210 laptop. In general, Vista ran smoothly and well on this <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=DELL'>Dell</a>, but some operations were annoyingly slow, including creating a new message in the built-in Windows Mail program. This surprised me, because the Dell had two gigabytes of memory and a fast processor.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Security</h5>
<p>Microsoft says Vista is much more secure than any other operating system. But this is hard to prove, especially at the beginning of its life, when few hackers and malefactors have access to it. One visible security feature asks for your permission before you do potentially dangerous tasks, like installing new software. This is a good thing, and it&#8217;s been on the Macintosh for years. But unlike the Mac version, the Vista version of this permission feature doesn&#8217;t necessarily require you to type in a password, so a stranger or a child using your PC could grant permission for something you yourself might not allow.</p>
<p>Vista also has built-in parental controls so you can restrict what a child can do on the computer. This is also already on the Macintosh, though the Vista controls are more elaborate.</p>
<p>Microsoft includes a free antispyware program in Vista, called Windows Defender. But PC Magazine regards it as inferior to paid programs like Spy Sweeper and Spy Doctor. So you may want to buy one of these. You should also buy an antivirus program, which isn&#8217;t included.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">User Interface</h5>
<p>The new Aero interface is lovely, and it makes using a PC more pleasant and efficient. It apes some elements on the Macintosh but retains a distinct look and feel. Icons of folders look three dimensional, and they pop. Most file icons are thumbnails that show a tiny preview of the underlying document.</p>
<div class="media-RIGHT" style="width: 150px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AI052A_PTECH_20070117174107.jpg" alt="Vista" height="223" width="150" /><br />Like the rest of Vista, the Start Menu  has a prettier, more refined look.</div>
<p>The old hourglass icon that appeared during delays has been replaced by a gleaming, spinning blue circle. The cutesy names for standard folders, like &#8220;My Pictures,&#8221; have been changed to simpler ones, like &#8220;Pictures.&#8221;</p>
<p>As on the Mac, you can now drag favorite folders into a list at the left of open windows, so it&#8217;s easy to get to them.</p>
<p>A new feature called Flip 3D shows a 3D view of all the programs you&#8217;re running and lets you scroll through them. It&#8217;s like the Mac&#8217;s excellent Exposé feature, though not quite as handy.</p>
<p>Another new feature, called the Sidebar, is a vertical strip at the side of the screen that can contain tiny programs, called Gadgets, displaying things like favorite photos, news headlines, stock prices and the weather. Once again, this is awfully similar to a Macintosh feature called Dashboard, which displays tiny programs called Widgets.</p>
<p>Some familiar Windows features have new names. The old Display control panel, where you chose screen savers and desktop pictures, is now called Personalization. The Add or Remove Programs control panel is now called Programs and Features.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Search</h5>
<p>Like the Mac, Windows now has rapid, universal, built-in search, a very welcome thing. The main search box is contained at the bottom of the Start menu, and it works well. Other search boxes appear in every open window.</p>
<p>You can also save searches as virtual folders, which will keep collecting files that meet your search criteria. This is another feature introduced earlier by Apple.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Built-In Programs</h5>
<p>The Outlook Express email program has been given a face-lift and renamed Windows Mail. But it&#8217;s pretty much the same, except for a new junk-mail filter. The Windows Address Book has been renamed Windows Contacts and, oddly, turned into a sort of file folder.</p>
<p>The latest version of the Internet Explorer Web browser, with tabbed browsing, is included, though it&#8217;s also available for Windows XP.</p>
<p>As on the Mac, Windows now has a nice, centralized Calendar program. And there&#8217;s a new photo-organizing program, Windows Photo Gallery, but it&#8217;s inferior to Apple&#8217;s iPhoto because it doesn&#8217;t allow you to create photo books, or add music to slide shows. There&#8217;s also a pretty rudimentary DVD-burning program.</p>
<p>The familiar WordPad program can no longer open Microsoft Word files (ironically, Apple&#8217;s free built-in word processor does).</p>
<p>Gradually, all Windows computers will be Vista computers, and that&#8217;s a good thing, if only for security reasons. But you may want to keep your older Windows XP box around awhile longer, until you can afford new hardware that can handle Vista.</p>
<ul>
<li>Email me at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20070118/vista-worthy-unexciting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

