Speaking at an event put on by Wealthfront that I also covered here, Quattrone noted that he worked on his first IPO way back in 1982.

Going back even further to 1971, if someone had invested a dollar in Intel’s IPO, it would be worth $1,480 today, Quattrone said. To put that into perspective (or whatever’s the opposite of perspective!), if Facebook goes public at a $100 billion market cap that grows 20 percent per year for 40 years, the company would then be worth an unimaginable $146 trillion.

Quattrone noted the importance of the LinkedIn IPO experience in stabilizing market expectations, though he said the valuations of today’s late-stage venture capital round make him nervous.

He admonished would-be public CEOs, “Don’t go public before you can be public,” and, “Respect public investors and treat them as partners and important constituents.”

The tireless Silicon Valley social butterfly Robert Scoble attended the Wealthfront event, and posted video from it here.

The Quattrone part goes until about 26 minutes into the video, after which comes a pretty interesting panel of venture capitalists (which I suppose should get a NSFW warning, because there were F-bombs involved).

“Sources familiar with the matter” tell Reuters that Brocade has received first-round bids from “a handful” of interested buyers.

Who might those parties be? Now that Dell has acquired Force10 Networks and Hewlett-Packard has snapped up 3Com, the list of possible suitors is a bit shorter than it used to be.

So who’s left? IBM remains a candidate and Oracle is always a possibility, regardless of what its CEO has said in the past. And beyond that? Private-equity firms, most likely.

Brocade shares are trading up more than 6 percent on buyout speculation.

Rather than become an HP executive, Autonomy CEO Mike Lynch, who’s been described as Britain’s first software billionaire, will remain head of Autonomy, which HP will operate as a wholly owned subsidiary, though he will report to Whitman.

Of course, the deal didn’t get done without some drama — what does get done at HP without drama these days? First there was the shock at the price paid, which represented a 64 percent premium over Autonomy’s share price. It was just one of the things that led to a shareholder lawsuit against HP.

There were certainly enough questions about the deal to cause some speculation around the notion that HP might try to back out of it. Those ideas gained some currency when HP’s board of directors fired former CEO Léo Apotheker, but not before giving him a pricey exit package.

Then there was the Oracle shopping scandal. Asked about Oracle’s position in the unstructured data market two weeks ago, CEO Larry Ellison said that his company had passed on a chance to acquire Autonomy because the price was too high. Lynch, apparently falling into a PR trap laid by Oracle, took issue with Ellison, saying Autonomy had never been shopped to Oracle, prompting Oracle to publicly call Lynch a liar, then produce a set of PowerPoint slides as evidence. Lynch then went on to blame his eager banker, Frank Quattrone. Of course, it was widely known that Autonomy had been quietly shopped around for months.

So that little kerfuffle is over, now that HP is in control and its corporate communications team, led by Lynn Anderson, is in charge.

Meanwhile, there’s the larger mission to worry about: HP has to prove that Autonomy was worth all that money, and there’s an awful lot at stake. HP shares are still trading near their lowest levels in six years, and closed today at $22.20, down 25 cents. According to the disputed slides prepared by Qatalyst partners that were shared at one time or another with Oracle, Autonomy is expected to bring in $1.1 billion in revenue next year, which would amount to less than 1 percent of HP’s forward revenue projection for 2012 of $127 billion. It’s going to be tough to make it pay. But like it or not, HP is stuck with it now.

As we reported Wednesday, Oracle decided to slap Lynch silly with a public rebuke concerning his comments to The Wall Street Journal that his company had never been shopped to Oracle.

Always eager to clear up the record — just, well, you know, because — Oracle went on to publish the PowerPoint slides sent by investment banker Frank Quattrone of Qatalyst Partners to Mark Hurd in January. The slides may or may not have had anything to do with a meeting held by Lynch, Quattrone, Oracle President Mark Hurd and its head of M&A, Douglas Kehring, in April. Or not! You see, the stories vary.

(Oracle, by the way, has since taken down the slides, but you can still read them here. Update: And we’re now told the slides are back up. Interesting!)

But what about the email those slides arrived with originally? Well, a kindly source has sent it to us. Dated Jan. 26 — you can read it below — it was sent to Hurd by Quattrone (whose address I’ve deleted as a courtesy). Judge for yourself, but to me it sure reads like the windup to a sales pitch.

From: Frank Quattrone
Date: January 26, 2011 7:48:37 AM PST
To: “‘mark.hurd@oracle.com’”
Subject: Fw: Autonomy slides

Hi Mark,
It was great to catch up earlier this month. I wanted to follow up by sending the slides I promised on Autonomy. Given its strong position in managing unstructured data (such as video, voice and photos), “meaning based” contextual enterprise search, data protection, compliance, archiving and content/web management, I beleive it’s a very strategic asset that could alter the balance of power in the industry for whoever might acquire it. And despite its strong track record of growth and very high profitability (50 pct margins), it trades at less than 20x earnings and around 11x Ebitda, huge discounts to the other strategic software assets of scale. Please let me know if you would like me to follow up with you, Doug K or otherwise.
Thanks
Frank

And it was! At least the email part. Quattrone weighed in on the whole kerfuffle via an email to Lynch, which Lynch then shared with the Financial Times Alphaville blog:

“The slides Oracle posted publicly were sent by me to Mark Hurd in January, were prepared by Qatalyst and were for the purpose of our independently pitching Autonomy as an idea to Oracle. These slides were not used in our April meeting with Mark and Doug.”

So what of the meeting in April? Well, apparently it wasn’t a sales pitch at all. No, really. As Autonomy said in a statement also sent to the FT:

“In April 2011, there was a meeting for approximately thirty or forty minutes between Autonomy and Mark Hurd, which was set up by Frank Quattrone as an introduction to Mark Hurd. Oracle is an Autonomy customer. It was made clear that Autonomy was not for sale and no sale process was under way. Mr. Quattrone’s company was not engaged by Autonomy at that time. There has been no other contact with Oracle since then. …

“Qatalyst have informed us that the slides Oracle has recently posted on its website were prepared and sent independently by Qatalyst to Oracle on 26 January (the content is clearly from January). This is the first time we have seen them. Autonomy was not involved in this nor was Qatalyst engaged by Autonomy until mid-year. Autonomy did not present these slides in the meeting.

“Oracle seems a little confused about the sequence of events and origins of the data it has received, something that would suggests it needs better management of and insight into the unstructured data on its internal systems. We would be delighted to help.”

Oh, snap! At least Lynch is learning the art of the snarky retort. So the slides were the work of eager bankers trying to get a deal cooking. And the meeting was just a friendly call by Autonomy’s CEO on a customer? With an investment banker and another company’s head of M&A — two people who have collectively done more Silicon Valley deals than any other people in the world — joining in just for kicks? Okay then.

While this tit-for-tat seems like a mildly entertaining tempest in a teapot, it’s a $12 billion teapot! One about which HP shareholders still seem to have a lot of questions, especially in light of the management change that has gone on there since the deal was announced. Time, however, is short: HP is said to be about ready to close on the deal Monday.

Why is it so important to Lynch that the world believe that Autonomy was not shopping itself, and not engaging in any discussions about selling itself? Because laws in the U.K. about corporate acquisitions are very strict, for one thing. And companies engaging in discussions about being acquired without disclosing that fact to shareholders quickly find themselves in hot water with regulators! That means CEOs in the U.K. get ticklish on this subject very easily.

Of course, the first official public disclosure about Autonomy being in discussions to sell itself to anyone crossed the wires at 1:32 pm New York time on Aug. 18, which, by my watch, is about two minutes after markets had closed in London. The disclosure, however, came about an hour and change after Bloomberg News reported that a deal was near. About 90 minutes after Autonomy’s disclosure in London — and with 52 minutes left before the close of markets in New York — came HP’s confirming statement that it was “in discussions.” Then, just after markets closed in New York, the deal was done. That leaves plenty of room for people on both sides of the Atlantic to ask all kinds of fun questions. Anyway.

And as we all know, Oracle — whether in January or April — passed on the opportunity to bid on Autonomy, primarily because the price was, as CEO Larry Ellison put it on a conference call last week, “shockingly high” at about $6 billion. And four months later — or eight, depending on when you start counting — on Aug. 18, Hewlett-Packard announced its plans to acquire Autonomy at nearly twice that price.

So what was the purpose of the April meeting in Oracle’s board room in Redwood Shores? Was it really a “lively discussion about databases,” as Lynch has previously claimed? Or an innocent customer call during which two masters of tech M&A just happened to be in the room? We don’t know exactly.

But we do know one thing: Having first characterized Ellison’s description of the matter as “just inaccurate,” then copping to a previously undisclosed meeting of some kind, Lynch does know how to change his story.

In a statement that seems not to have circulated as an official press release, but was emailed to a few U.K.-based tech journalists such as Chris Mellor at the Register, Lynch gives a more detailed account of the real reason for his “trip to SF” and his meeting in April with Oracle president Mark Hurd.

On one of my trips to SF (April 2011), Frank Quattrone, whom I have known for a long time, offered to introduce me to Mark Hurd. Oracle was a customer and I have never met him, so it was a good opportunity. Frank does this from time to time on my visits, he has introduced me to many people… NOTE: Frank was not engaged by Autonomy and there was no process running. The company was not for sale. I recall meeting with Mark and someone else I believe called Doug. At the start of the meeting they joked that Frank was there to sell them something. Frank and I made it clear that was not the case. We then met and had a lively discussion about database technologies. The meeting lasted approximately 30 mins. Frank is happy to confirm this.

Oracle’s corporate communications department, working unusually late, issued a retort that crossed the wires sometime after 1 am ET, calling Lynch’s statement “another whopper.”

It was no “lively discussion of database technologies,” Oracle says. Why bring two PowerPoint decks all devoted to Autonomy’s financial performance? Oracle, making good on last night’s implied threat to publish the decks, did so, and you can see them for yourself below.

Oracle published the slides in hope, it says, of restoring Lynch’s memory of a meeting he initially said never took place. “Yesterday, the Autonomy CEO did not remember having any meeting with Oracle,” the company said. “Today, he remembers the April meeting and inaccurately describes how it came about and what was discussed. Tomorrow, he will need to explain his slides.”

The kerfuffle is over Lynch’s defense of a comment Oracle CEO Larry Ellison made on a conference call with analysts last week. Asked about the current buzzword “unstructured data” and Oracle’s capabilities around it, Ellison engaged in his favorite hobby and took a jab at Hewlett-Packard — which last month said it would acquire Autonomy in a deal valued at $11.7 billion. “Autonomy was a shock to us. We looked at the price and thought it was absurdly high. We had no interest in making the Autonomy acquisition,” he said then.

He also went on to say that unstructured data can readily be added to Oracle’s existing database technology. “We think we’re much better off with a couple of smaller acquisitions and to continue to innovate in that area, so that the unstructured data and the structured data both find their way into an Oracle Database,” he said.

That, of course, didn’t sit well with Lynch, who has so far quietly endured criticism that HP is overpaying for Autonomy. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, he denied that Autonomy was ever shopped to Oracle, and characterized Ellison’s understanding of the unstructured data problem as “very weak.”

Those, of course, were fighting words to Oracle, which decided to remind him of his April meeting with Hurd and Oracle’s M&A head Douglas Kehring.

It’s also helpful to remember that late last year Autonomy was being mentioned as the target of a bidding war between Oracle and Microsoft, according to a rumor-based story planted in the U.K.’s Daily Mail. Though such stories based on “takeover chatter” occur practically every day, someone with some skin in the game clearly wanted the markets to think Oracle was kicking Autonomy’s tires.

Lynch, of course, is really a proxy for HP’s new CEO Meg Whitman and Chairman Ray Lane, who have to get the Autonomy deal done and live with the price that former CEO Léo Apotheker agreed to pay for it. I asked Whitman about it last week, and she said “It is what it is.” The most interesting thing that has emerged from all this, however, is that Oracle claims to have considered Autonomy overpriced at a $6 billion valuation. HP paid almost twice that. Game on.

Autonomy Presentation 1 503341

Autonomy Presentation 2 503342

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal today, Autonomy’s CEO Mike Lynch — the man sometimes described as the British Bill Gates — says Oracle was never approached as a possible buyer of his company late last year. Mentioned by bankers mulling possible acquirers, maybe, but never approached directly.

The statement came in response to a verbal slap by Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, made on an earnings conference call last week, that Oracle had been approached by Autonomy, and took a pass because the price was “absurdly high.”

Indeed, there were reports — one I remarked on at the time — suggesting that Oracle had kicked Autonomy’s tires, and Autonomy shares spiked on the very suggestion that the acquisitive Oracle would take the firm out. They obviously proved unfounded, and Autonomy went on its merry all-but-anonymous way until HP stepped in with an $11.7 billion offer that was announced on Aug. 18.

The latest version of events just emerged in a statement from Oracle. Oh yes, Oracle says, Lynch did indeed approach Oracle about a deal, and specifically made a pitch — complete with a PowerPoint presentation — to Oracle president Mark Hurd and to its M&A head Douglas Kehring. According to Oracle’s recollection, in a meeting attended by Lynch’s banker Frank Quattrone, Hurd told Lynch that he thought Autonomy was overpriced at $6 billion, roughly half of what HP paid. Also: Oracle still has the PowerPoint deck. Zing!

The full Oracle statement is below:

“After HP agreed to acquire Autonomy for over $11.7 billion dollars, Oracle commented that Autonomy had been ‘shopped’ to Oracle as well, but Oracle wasn’t interested because the price was way too high. Mike Lynch, Autonomy CEO, then publicly denied that his company had been shopped to Oracle. Specifically, Mr. Lynch said, “If some bank happened to come with us on a list, that is nothing to do with us.” Mr. Lynch then accused of Oracle of being ‘inaccurate’. Either Mr. Lynch has a very poor memory or he’s lying. ‘Some bank’ did not just happen to come to Oracle with Autonomy ‘on a list’.” The truth is that Mr. Lynch came to Oracle, along with his investment banker, Frank Quattrone, and met with Oracle’s head of M&A, Douglas Kehring and Oracle President Mark Hurd at 11 am on April 1, 2011. After listening to Mr. Lynch’s PowerPoint slide sales pitch to sell Autonomy to Oracle, Mr. Kehring and Mr. Hurd told Mr. Lynch that with a current market value of $6 billion, Autonomy was already extremely over-priced. The Lynch shopping visit to Oracle is easy to verify. We still have his PowerPoint slides.”

Former Harvard president and White House economic adviser Larry Summers had the line that echoed furthest from Aspen into the outside world: Calling the Facebook-suing Winklevoss twins “assholes” and affirming that the “Social Network” portrayal of him arrogantly dismissing their concerns as Harvard undergrads was accurate. Summers said:

One of the things you learn as a college president is that if an undergraduate is wearing a tie and jacket on Thursday afternoon at three o’clock, there are two possibilities. One is that they’re looking for a job and have an interview; the other is that they are an asshole. This was the latter case.

The Winklevii, for their part, publicly protested that the president of a college probably shouldn’t be writing off students for what they wear.

Below is a video of just the Winklevii quote, but if you’re interested in more topical U.S. economy stuff you may want to watch the full thing, which was quite good.

A more unexpected breakout hit was a panel session on mobile payments that had Square’s Keith Rabois with his claws out toward Google’s Stephanie Tilenius and the general premise of near field communications money transfers. Then Verifone’s Doug Bergeron compared Square to a subprime mortgage lender.

Here’s the video:

(Google CFO Patrick Pichette got in another mobile payment quotable during a separate session, saying, “A wallet is a medieval item, right? It’s made of hide.”)

And then lastly, and more broadly, investment banker Frank Quattrone brought today’s technology “bubble” into context with a mix of zingers and stats. He said LinkedIn is the Netscape of this era (beginning of a boom, not end of a bubble), and traced a shift in market caps from older tech giants to emerging ones.

Here’s that session, with video and a full transcript:

In yet another sign that the Internet market is getting very interesting to Wall Street, well-known analyst Imran Khan (pictured here) is jumping from his perch as managing director at J.P. Morgan to become a banker at Credit Suisse, according to sources close to the situation.

In this new role, the high-profile Khan–well known for his reports on digital companies–will be running investment banking for Internet markets, including IPOs and M&A.

Khan, who will leave Morgan in several months, is making a big shift from analyst to banker, designed to give Credit Suisse more credibility in the arena as more Web companies come to market.

He also has a strong focus internationally, especially in China, where there has been huge growth of late.

Khan did not return an email and phone call seeking comment, and Credit Suisse has also not responded.

But one industry veteran noted that Khan had the profile and potential–mixing analysis with banking–to be the next investment star, especially as initial public offerings ramp up again.

“In my mind, Imran is certainly as good as Frank Quattrone, said the person, referring to the well-known Silicon Valley banking legend of Web 1.0, who remains active still in dealmaking. “And even stronger in some ways, because of his international and China domain expertise.”

The report also says that the company has hired Goldman Sachs (GS) and the Frank Quattrone-founded investment firm Qatalyst Partners to find a buyer.

Read the rest of this post on the original site