<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; geo-tagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/geo-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: Consumers Should Think Twice Before Broadcasting Location</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110126/microsoft-consumers-should-think-twice-before-broadcasting-location/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110126/microsoft-consumers-should-think-twice-before-broadcasting-location/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendon Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Privacy Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geo-tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geofence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Latitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location-based services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/?p=3035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview, Microsoft's chief privacy officer says consumers should double-check the connections in their social networks before sharing their location with so-called friends. Another area of concern is all those photos being geo-tagged by our phones.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more and more services tap into location-based data, consumers need to take steps to make sure they are aware just how broadly they are sharing that information.</p>
<p>That was one of several points stressed by Microsoft Chief Privacy Officer Brendon Lynch, who sat down with Mobilized ahead of his <a href="http://www.churchillclub.org/eventDetail.jsp?EVT_ID=890">appearance at a Churchill Club event Wednesday night</a> focused on location-based services.<br />
<img src="http://mobilized.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/brandon-lynch-170x275.jpg" alt="" title="brendon-lynch" width="170" height="275" class="alignright size-full wp-image-3042" /><br />
Among the company&#8217;s recommendations is that consumers think twice before taking actions such as broadcasting their location when they are alone or sharing geo-tagged photos of their home or children.</p>
<p>Microsoft did some research in December that found that three in five consumers are aware of location-based services and roughly half say they have used such a service, with one in 10 of those surveyed saying they use such services on a daily basis.</p>
<p>While the most common reported usages were for things like navigation, traffic and weather, about 18 percent of respondents said they were using a service like Foursquare, Facebook or Google Latitude that broadcasts their location.</p>
<p>The software maker is releasing the results later on Wednesday ahead of Friday&#8217;s commemoration of <a href="http://dataprivacyday2011.org/">Data Privacy Day</a>. This year, the company decided to focus its efforts on location-based services.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a high-stakes, high-value data element,&#8221; Lynch said.</p>
<p>Lynch also noted that people sharing location with their social network might want to review just how wide that network is.</p>
<p>&#8220;I actually believe [sharing of] location data is a situation which probably should cause people to really go review that list,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>And while there is a responsibility on consumers to be more aware, Lynch said, those building services and products also need to do their part.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can build it into the experience to actually make people aware that this is going to happen and they have a role to play in the choice,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s research found that privacy concerns are a barrier for some to adopting location-based services, particularly in the U.S. About half of overall survey respondents said they would be more comfortable with such services if they had more information on just who was seeing the information being shared.</p>
<p>The company also found that while 94 percent of consumers find location-based services to be valuable, they weren&#8217;t terribly willing to pay, and those who were often weren&#8217;t willing to pay more than $10 for such services. That seems to indicate more promise for advertising-funded services, especially since nearly half of those who have seen a location-based mobile ad have taken action on the ad&#8211;vastly higher than the response rates seen on traditional online ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110126/microsoft-consumers-should-think-twice-before-broadcasting-location/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Novelty? Sure. Business? Could Be! Stickybits Raises Another $1.6 Million.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100519/novelty-sure-business-could-be-stickybits-raises-another-1-6-million/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100519/novelty-sure-business-could-be-stickybits-raises-another-1-6-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BetaWorks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Chasen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Sacca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Round Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geo-tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Case Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Kapor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polaris Venture Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smallbiz Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sticker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stickybits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=19669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stickybits is the kind of thing that might make more sense if you're not entirely sober: It's a funky, practical-joke-from-the-future concept that involves stickers, scannable bar codes and geo-tagging. It might also be a business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stickybits.com/"></a><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2010/05/sticker.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-19672" title="sticker" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2010/05/sticker.png" alt="" width="250" height="250" /></a>Stickybits is the kind of thing that might make more sense if you&#8217;re not entirely sober: It&#8217;s a funky, practical-joke-from-the-future concept that involves stickers, scannable bar codes and geo-tagging.</p>
<p>It might also be a business. That&#8217;s the hope of investors who have just plowed $1.6 million into the six-man operation, which launched a few months ago.</p>
<p>First Round Capital and Lower Case Capital are putting new money into the company, along with existing investors Mitch Kapor and Polaris Venture Partners, who previously invested $300,000. Stickybits is also touting the arrival of semi-celebrity angel investor Chris Sacca.</p>
<p>Again, explaining Stickybits takes a bit of work, and it may be easier if you&#8217;re drinking beer instead of coffee. <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1973759_1973760_1973764,00.html">Time.com</a> did a fairly concise job, though: Using an Apple (AAPL) iPhone or Google (GOOG) Android, &#8220;users can scan barcodes, attach a piece of information&#8211;either a video, note or audio recording&#8211;and receive a notification whenever someone else scans the same object. Stickybits also produces unique, one-off  barcodes of its own that, when attached to a postcard, for example, add digital memory to static objects.&#8221;</p>
<p>So that sort of sounds fun, and there might even be some commercial applications: You can see how marketers might want to play around with tagging the bar codes on the stuff they sell, etc.</p>
<p>Founder <a href="http://www.billychasen.com/">Billy Chasen</a>, a graduate of the Betaworks start-up incubator, says the company intends to court those commercial customers, via privileged access to its API, as well as a dashboard they could use to manage their bar codes.</p>
<p>But Chasen says his company won&#8217;t be consumed with consumer marketers. &#8220;It&#8217;s not going to turn into something where it&#8217;s just a tool for brands,&#8221; he says. &#8220;We want it to be fun.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cool! In the meantime, Stickybits is generating a couple dollars by <a href="http://stickybits.com/buystickers/">selling those personalized barcode stickers</a>. I bet someone has already slapped one on a bong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100519/novelty-sure-business-could-be-stickybits-raises-another-1-6-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iLife Gets Better; Just Don't Ask It to Find a Face</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090128/ilife-gets-better-just-dont-ask-it-to-find-a-face/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090128/ilife-gets-better-just-dont-ask-it-to-find-a-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GarageBand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geo-tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iDVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife '09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMovie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norah Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thumbnail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090128/ilife-gets-better-just-dont-ask-it-to-find-a-face/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt reviews the new features of iPhoto, GarageBand and iMovie in Apple's iLife &#8217;09.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=aapl'>Apple</a>&#8216;s Macintosh computers are known for handsome hardware design, what really makes the Mac distinctive is its built-in software. That software includes a suite of multimedia programs, called iLife, which is preinstalled, free, on every new Mac.</p>
<p>The iLife software has integrated photo, video, music and Web-design applications meant for average, nontechnical consumers. It is better, in my view, than any comparable offering on the Windows platform, even those that cost extra.</p>
<p>This week, Apple (AAPL) released the latest version of the suite, called iLife &rsquo;09, and I have been testing it for a while. It includes five programs: iPhoto, iMovie, GarageBand, iWeb and iDVD. The new version will be bundled on new Macs, and current Mac owners can upgrade to it for $79.</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=DE3B3B8D-CB78-4384-AF1F-DBD0F2D3FEF9&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={DE3B3B8D-CB78-4384-AF1F-DBD0F2D3FEF9}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
<p>This latest iteration isn&#8217;t a radical revision of iLife, and I wouldn&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s a must-have upgrade for current Mac owners. But three of the programs &#8212; iPhoto, iMovie and GarageBand &#8212; have significant new features that make them more appealing and useful.</p>
<p>In particular, iPhoto now has the ability to detect and identify faces in your photos; to identify and map the location where they were shot; and to directly post sets of photos to, and synchronize them with, the popular online services Facebook and Flickr.</p>
<p>I focused my tests on iPhoto&#8217;s sexiest new feature &#8212; face recognition. It worked OK, but it wasn&#8217;t as good as I had expected from software made by Apple.</p>
<p>GarageBand, a powerful but easy tool allowing nonprofessionals to mix and produce music, now offers beautifully produced video lessons in how to play the two most popular instruments: guitar and piano. There are some free lessons built in, but you can also buy, for $5 each, lessons from famous artists such as Sting and Norah Jones.</p>
<p>In iMovie, you can now do precision editing of clips. You also can insert one clip in the middle of another by simply dragging and dropping; insert animated maps into travel movies; and apply handsome themes that can make a home movie look like, say, a scrapbook. There&#8217;s also a new tool that stabilizes jerky footage, like video shot from a moving car, although Apple warns that this process can take hours.</p>
<p>For me, however, the most important improvements in iLife &rsquo;09 are in iPhoto, Apple&#8217;s program for organizing, editing and sharing digital pictures. The top two are face recognition and geo-tagging, the ability to tag a photo with its location. Neither of these features is unique to iPhoto. For instance, the Web-based version of Google&#8217;s (GOOG) Picasa photo software has face recognition, and Flickr, a Yahoo (YHOO) online service, has location tagging. But Apple has enabled them in iPhoto in its typical handsome, easy manner.</p>
<p>There are two new views of your photos in iPhoto &rsquo;09. One, called Faces, organizes all the photos in which faces have been identified. You click on a thumbnail bearing a person&#8217;s face and get an expanded display showing all of the photos identified as including that person.</p>
<p>The second, called Places, shows a Google map with pins in the places where the locations of your photos have been identified. Click on a pin, and see a display of all the photos shot at that location.</p>
<p>Face recognition takes several steps. First, iPhoto analyzes your photos to pick out the faces, which are then shown enclosed in a rectangle when you click the new &#8220;name&#8221; button. You then are prompted to type in a name under the rectangle identifying each face. Once you&#8217;ve identified the same person in multiple photos, iPhoto begins to identify that face in any additional photos. If you bring up a picture of a person you&#8217;ve identified, and click &#8220;confirm name,&#8221; iPhoto will show you other pictures it thinks include the same person, and ask that you confirm its suggestions.</p>
<p>In my tests, on two different Macs with thousands of photos, face recognition worked most of the time. But I was too often disappointed. In a surprisingly large minority of cases, iPhoto failed to detect the presence of a face, even when it was large and clear, or to correctly identify faces it did detect, even after I had named or confirmed the same face in dozens or scores of other pictures.</p>
<p>The program sometimes confused men and women, and in a few cases even claimed animals or inanimate objects were people. It rarely detected faces shot from the side, even if they were sharp and obvious. The program also was slow to analyze newly imported photos, or to synchronize name tags already entered on Facebook, a feature Apple touts.</p>
<p>The Places feature worked much better, automatically recognizing the location of pictures taken from devices with built-in GPS tagging, like Apple&#8217;s own iPhone, and optionally showing a map when you click on a photo. It was also easy to manually enter a location for an entire &#8220;event,&#8221; or group, of photos taken at one time.</p>
<p>I still like and recommend iPhoto and iLife. But, in my opinion, the new face-recognition system isn&#8217;t up to Apple&#8217;s self-proclaimed high standards, and isn&#8217;t reliable enough to justify an upgrade all by itself.</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://www.walt.allthingsd.com" rel="external">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</em></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090128/ilife-gets-better-just-dont-ask-it-to-find-a-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

