<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Glengarry Glen Ross</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/glengarry-glen-ross/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:33:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Dear FTC: Is This the Kind of Thing You Want Me to Disclose?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091016/dear-ftc-is-this-the-kind-of-thing-you-want-me-to-disclose/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091016/dear-ftc-is-this-the-kind-of-thing-you-want-me-to-disclose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad:tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones Code of Conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glengarry Glen Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A marketer offers to pay me per post. I don't know whether to be flattered or offended.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go back and forth on the new <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090622/adding-an-amazon-or-apple-affiliate-link-to-your-blog-the-feds-want-to-know/">blogger disclosure rules</a> the Federal Trade Commission rolled out last week. Part of me thinks the agency is trying to boil the ocean, and without any good reason&#8211;even if a blogger runs a post at the behest of a sleazy marketers, who really cares? On the other hand, there really are some sleazy marketers out there, so many that letters like this one, which popped into my inbox this morning, don&#8217;t even raise an eyebrow:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>My name is [Redacted] and I’m working with the ad:tech team on the social media outreach and promotion for ad:tech New York. ad:tech recognizes that you are a key influencer in the digital marketing community, and as such, I’d like to see if you are interested in a promotion exchange.</p>
<p>ad:tech will provide:</p>
<ul>
<li>Twitter announcement of your involvement with ad:tech New York to our 6,800+ followers.</li>
<li>Your choice of: a free pass to the exhibit hall (valued at $35) or 35% off a full conference pass.</li>
</ul>
<p>*If you are already registered or can’t make it to the event, you can offer it as a prize to your network, give it to a friend or client&#8230;.It is completely transferrable.</p>
<p>We ask you provide:</p>
<ul>
<li>No less than 3 posts about ad:tech New York on Twitter, Facebook or your blog. Suggested postings: a session you’re interested in, why you like ad:tech, the exhibitors that you want to see or technologies that you are interested in learning about. What you share is up to you&#8211;it just needs to be posted by November 1.</li>
</ul>
<p>Interested in writing a blog post and would like additional information on ad:tech? Quotes, photos, interviews, ideas, etc. will happily be offered with request.</p>
<p>To redeem the offer:<br />
Share 3 posts about ad:tech, then email me, [X]@ad-tech.com, with links/screenshots by November 1.</p>
<ul>
<li>Tell me how you’d like ad:tech to promote your involvement with the event at the show.</li>
<li>Let me know if you’d like the free expo pass or the 35% discount on the conference.</li>
</ul>
<p>Please let me know if this is something that you are interested in or if you have any questions?</p>
<p>Thank you for your continued support of ad:tech. I hope to meet you in New York!</p>
<p>[Redacted]<br />
Social Media Outreach<br />
ad:tech</p></blockquote>
<p>Well. Flattery is always a nice approach, so I&#8217;m pleased to hear about my influencer status. Also, it&#8217;s nice that the ad:tech team is willing to provide &#8220;ideas&#8221; for me upon request.</p>
<p>Alas, even if I wanted to take ad:tech up on its offer, the <a href="http://dowjones.com/codeconduct.asp">Dow Jones Code of Conduct</a> would prevent me from doing so.</p>
<p>But this letter <em>does</em> generate two questions for me:</p>
<ul>
<li>Is my work nearly worthless? Or pretty valuable? Three posts is a little less than a day&#8217;s work for me. Ad:tech says that&#8217;s worth either $35 (a free expo pass) or up to $558 (35 percent of the highest price for an ad:tech conference pass). That&#8217;s a big swing!</li>
<li>I know there are a lot of &#8220;social media experts&#8221; out there, because there are a lot of them following me on <a href="http://twitter.com/pkafka">Twitter</a>. But I don&#8217;t really know what they do. Is this it? That can&#8217;t be right. Can it?</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyway, this kind of thing always makes we want to pull up a &#8220;Glengarry Glen Ross&#8221; clip. There isn&#8217;t a direct connection, mind you. Just a vibe.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="212" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y3EvCIU7gb8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="212" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y3EvCIU7gb8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091016/dear-ftc-is-this-the-kind-of-thing-you-want-me-to-disclose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Twitter Business That Doesn't Make Money for Twitter: Pay Per Twitterer</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090617/another-twitter-business-that-doesnt-make-money-for-twitter-pay-per-twitterer/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090617/another-twitter-business-that-doesnt-make-money-for-twitter-pay-per-twitterer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glengarry Glen Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaged goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pontiflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zephrin Lasker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=8236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet another addition to the Twitter ecosystem of companies based on the microblogging service, but that don't pay it a dime: Pontiflex, which is trying to charge marketers for each Twitter user name it collects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/glengarry.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8242" title="glengarry" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/glengarry-250x186.png" alt="glengarry" width="250" height="186" /></a></p>
<p>One day I&#8217;ll get to stop writing this, because Twitter is slowly starting to sketch out some <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090323/looky-here-actual-revenue-for-twitter-courtesy-of-microsoft/">revenue</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/help/verified">plans</a>.</p>
<p>But for now, it still holds true: Almost all of the money Twitter is generating is being generated by companies other than Twitter. They&#8217;re members of the growing ecosystem of companies that base their business on the microblogging service, but don&#8217;t pay Twitter a dime.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another one: <a href="http://pontiflex.com/">Pontiflex</a>, a lead-generation start-up that hoovers up names and other info from users who visit its network of publishers and then sells the data to marketers. The Brooklyn-based company is rolling out a <a href="http://pontiflex.com/twitter/">Twitter product</a> that lets marketers compile a list of interested Twitter users.</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/travel_twitter_capture.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8238" title="travel_twitter_capture" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/travel_twitter_capture-250x208.jpg" alt="travel_twitter_capture" width="250" height="208" /></a>Sound simple? It is. All Pontiflex is doing is adding a Twitter &#8220;handle&#8221; field to its lead-generation forms (see example at right). Armed with these data, a marketer can follow Twitterers who say they&#8217;re interested in their products, and&#8230;not much else.</p>
<p>Since the users aren&#8217;t actually signing up to &#8220;follow&#8221; any of the marketers, said marketers can&#8217;t send them direct messages. The marketers could try to &#8220;at reply&#8221; their leads&#8211;the equivalent of shouting out the name of someone you think might be at a loud cocktail party but can&#8217;t actually see. But that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s that information worth? Depends, says Pontiflex CEO Zephrin Lasker. Probably more than an email address, but less than a phone number. He says pricing will depend on clients, volume, etc., but he figures he&#8217;ll be able to sell each Twitter handle to his consumer packaged goods clients for a couple bucks a pop. Call it anywhere from 50 cents to $5 per name.</p>
<p>Per usual, Twitter won&#8217;t see a penny of that.</p>
<p>Like most other Twitter ecosystem ideas, this one only works if Twitter really crosses over from novelty to mainstream and stays there. And the jury&#8217;s still out on that.</p>
<p>But in the meantime, marketers want in on the new hotness, and Lasker is happy to oblige.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is one of those things that people don&#8217;t know how to participate in, but they want to be there,&#8221; he says. &#8220;So, that&#8217;s where we can help.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, just because we&#8217;re talking about leads, and I use any excuse I can get, here&#8217;s Alec Baldwin&#8217;s awesome &#8220;Always Be Closing&#8221; speech from &#8220;Glengarry Glen Ross.&#8221; (Warning! Contains salty sales language.)</p>
<p><object width="350" height="283" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/TROhlThs9qY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TROhlThs9qY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090617/another-twitter-business-that-doesnt-make-money-for-twitter-pay-per-twitterer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

