<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Hey Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/hey-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Boobs</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081230/boobs/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081230/boobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast-feeding is not Obscene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hey Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook’s Terms of Service and Code of Conduct state explicitly that “photos and videos containing nudity…are not allowed.” So it shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone that the social network removes images that violate those terms, even if they happen to feature a mother breastfeeding her child.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/zuckerberg_leche.jpg" alt="" title="zuckerberg_leche" width="200" height="197" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10292" />Facebook&#8217;s <a href="http://www.facebook.com/help/seeall.php?facebook&amp;id=421">&#8220;Warnings&#8221; page</a> explicitly states that &#8220;photos and videos containing nudity&#8230;are not allowed,&#8221; a prohibition echoed in its <a href="http://www.facebook.com/codeofconduct.php">Code of Conduct</a>. So it shouldn&#8217;t come as a surprise to anyone that the social network removes images that violate those terms, even if they happen to feature a mother breastfeeding her child. Yet, a fast-growing group of mothers is protesting <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_11321458">Facebook&#8217;s prohibition of member breastfeeding photos</a> that reveal the nipple or areola. Rallying on-site in a group called <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2517126532">&#8220;Hey Facebook, Breastfeeding is not Obscene&#8221;</a> that now boasts well over 80,000 members, they&#8217;re asking the social network to exempt such photos from its TOS. &#8220;I don&#8217;t want future moms to feel that breastfeeding is shameful,&#8221; Heather Farley, one of the groups organizers, told the San Jose Mercury News. &#8220;It might keep them from breastfeeding.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, some 40 states now have laws allowing women to breastfeed in public, why shouldn&#8217;t Facebook allow them to post their breastfeeding photos?</p>
<p>Because a photo of an exposed breast with a baby in it is still a photo of an exposed breast. And right now, Facebook members are prohibited from posting photos of exposed breasts to their profiles. &#8220;We agree that breastfeeding is natural and beautiful and we&#8217;re very glad to know that it is so important to some mothers to share this experience with others on Facebook including children,&#8221; Facebook explained in a statement. &#8220;Photos containing a fully exposed breast&#8211;as defined by showing the nipple or areola&#8211;do violate those terms on obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit material and may be removed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081230/boobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

