<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Joint Economic Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/joint-economic-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Newspapers to Congress: Please Don't Give Us a Bailout</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090924/newspapers-to-congress-please-dont-give-us-a-bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090924/newspapers-to-congress-please-dont-give-us-a-bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constituents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sturm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Economic Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net operating loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspaper Association of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax dollars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=11353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newspaper bailout proposal you may have heard about over the last few months? The newspapers want no part of it, says an industry spokesman. 

That said, the industry wouldn't turn down some help from Congress, says John Sturm, CEO of the Newspaper Association of America. He is testifying before a joint committee this morning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/newspaperless.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-7276" title="newspaperless" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/newspaperless-250x174.jpg" alt="newspaperless" width="250" height="174" /></a>The newspaper bailout proposal you may have heard about over the last few months? The newspapers want no part of it, says an industry spokesman.</p>
<p>That said, the industry wouldn&#8217;t turn down some help from Congress, says John Sturm, CEO of the Newspaper Association of America.</p>
<p>Testifying at a House hearing this morning, Sturm says his group <em>does</em> like proposals that would let newspapers&#8211;and other businesses&#8211;change some of their accounting practices related to tax refunds (via net operating-loss provisions) and pension plans. Oh, and he&#8217;s in favor of a proposed law that would let papers operate as nonprofits while still generating advertising revenue.</p>
<p>The complete text of Sturm&#8217;s opening statement is embedded at the bottom of this post, and if you want to watch the hearing, organized by Congress&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jec.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Press.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=ce03ce4d-5056-8059-76f2-8b02fccb18e3">Joint Economic Committee</a>, it was streamed live (albeit choppily) <a href="http://budget.edgeboss.net/wmedia-live/budget/11374/100_budget-video_060519.asx">here</a>.</p>
<p>My political handicapping skills are nonexistent, but that said, I think there&#8217;s no chance of Congress passing a bill that singles out newspapers for aid. Local papers are still vitally important to local lawmakers, but many of those lawmakers&#8217; constituents hate their papers, for all manner of offenses, real and imagined. I just can&#8217;t imagine what they&#8217;d do if they were told their tax dollars were going to support their local rag.</p>
<p>Still, I wouldn&#8217;t rule out some politically motivated pressure being applied to bogeymen like Craigslist and Google (GOOG), in the form of antitrust scrutiny or other arm-twisting.</p>
<p><object id="_ds_11950934" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="550" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="_ds_11950934" /><param name="FlashVars" value="doc_id=11950934&amp;mem_id=288399&amp;doc_type=pdf&amp;fullscreen=0" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://viewer.docstoc.com/" /><param name="flashvars" value="doc_id=11950934&amp;mem_id=288399&amp;doc_type=pdf&amp;fullscreen=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="_ds_11950934" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="550" src="http://viewer.docstoc.com/" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="doc_id=11950934&amp;mem_id=288399&amp;doc_type=pdf&amp;fullscreen=0" name="_ds_11950934"></embed></object><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/11950934/JFS-Statement-Joint-Economic-Committee-092409-Hearing">JFS-Statement-Joint-Economic-Committee-092409-Hearing</a> &#8211; </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090924/newspapers-to-congress-please-dont-give-us-a-bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://budget.edgeboss.net/wmedia-live/budget/11374/100_budget-video_060519.asx" length="1331" type="video/x-ms-asf" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April’s Job Loss Report Less of a Train Wreck Than March’s</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090506/april%e2%80%99s-job-loss-report-less-of-a-train-wreck-than-march%e2%80%99s/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090506/april%e2%80%99s-job-loss-report-less-of-a-train-wreck-than-march%e2%80%99s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[April]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chairman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenger Gray & Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Challenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Economic Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned workforce reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of job cuts made during April was the lowest since October. That’s the latest from outplacement services provider Challenger, Gray &#38; Christmas, which said today that “planned workforce reductions” in April were 132,590--12 percent fewer than the more than 150,000 recorded in March. Great news, right? Until you realize that the “planned reductions” to which the company refers were up 47 percent from a year earlier and are still at recession levels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/freecoffeefortheunemployed-250x175.jpg" alt="freecoffeefortheunemployed" title="freecoffeefortheunemployed" width="250" height="175" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-17019" />The number of job cuts made in April was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gc04/idUKTRE5452O120090506?sp=true">the lowest since October</a>. That’s the latest from outplacement services provider Challenger, Gray &#038; Christmas, which said today that “planned workforce reductions” in April were 132,590&#8211;12 percent fewer than the more than 150,000 recorded in March.</p>
<p>Great news, right? Until you realize that the &#8220;planned reductions” to which the company refers were up 47 percent from a year earlier and are still at recession levels. So while this is the third consecutive month in which layoffs declined, the job market is still in lousy shape.</p>
<p>Employers have sacked 711,100 employees so far this year. That&#8217;s 145 percent percent more than the 290,671 they cut in the first quarter of 2008. Keep in mind, this is “planned layoffs” we’re talking about. Presumably there were some unplanned ones as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;Job cuts are still at recession levels, but the fact that they are falling is certainly promising and may suggest that employers are starting to feel a little more confident about future business conditions,” said Challenger CEO John Challenger. “Hopefully, the next few months will bring further relief, as we tend to see downsizing activity slow during the summer months.”</p>
<p>Yeah, “hopefully.” But don’t count on it. Because Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says the economy hasn’t quite bottomed out yet. Which means things may get a bit worse before they get better.</p>
<p>“The most recent information on the labor market&#8211;the number of new and continuing claims for unemployment insurance through late April&#8211;suggests that we are likely to see further sizable job losses and increased unemployment in coming months,” <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aoMAyV8N1S3Q&amp;refer=news">Bernanke recently told the congressional Joint Economic Committee.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090506/april%e2%80%99s-job-loss-report-less-of-a-train-wreck-than-march%e2%80%99s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#039;ve Found a Golden Runic Hammer! Click Here to Complete Your 1099 &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EverQuest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Economic Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With millions of dollars in virtual currency changing hands each month in simulated worlds like EverQuest and Second Life, there are increasing reports of virtual-world moguls amassing real-world riches and scholars warning that these online worlds could be the &#8220;21st century&#8217;s equivalent of hiding funds offshore.&#8221; So it may be only a matter of time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With millions of dollars in virtual currency changing hands each month in simulated worlds like EverQuest and Second Life, there are increasing reports of <a href="http://www.anshechung.com/include/press/press_release251106.html">virtual-world moguls amassing real-world riches</a> and scholars warning that these online worlds could be the &#8220;21st century&#8217;s equivalent of hiding funds offshore.&#8221; So it may be only a matter of time before tax authorities open a virtual office or two. And in the not-too-distant future, they may.</p>
<p>Congress&#8217; Joint Economic Committee is <a href="http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9733848-7.html">expected to issue a report on the potential taxation of virtual goods</a> by the end of July. No word yet on what it might say, although a JEC director has suggested that &#8220;as long as virtual activity stays within the virtual economy, it shouldn&#8217;t be taxable.&#8221; So is that to say that there are tax consequences for activity that extends beyond it? Sounds like it. &#8220;Any time someone wins a tangible prize or award, the value is reportable as taxable income,&#8221; <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/02/technology/sl_taxes/index.htm">an Internal Revenue Service rep told CNN</a> earlier this year. &#8220;An accumulation of &#8216;points&#8217; would not result in tax consequences, but redeeming or selling them for money, goods, or services would.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20070625/death-virtual-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

