<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Microsoft Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/microsoft-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Uninstall Microsoft Workforce Service Pack?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081222/uninstall-microsoft-workforce-service-pack/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081222/uninstall-microsoft-workforce-service-pack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Wilcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mini-Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nortel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech may be done with layoffs for 2008, but 2009 is another matter entirely. Now that the souring economy has had its way with Yahoo and AMD and Palm and Sun and Nortel, it’s moving on to bigger fare. We’ve already heard predictions that Google will sack as much as 15 percent of its workforce next year. Now come rumors that Microsoft is steeling itself for large-scale job cuts as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/ballmerreaper.jpg" alt="" title="ballmerreaper" width="200" height="300" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10107" />Tech may be done with layoffs for 2008, but 2009 is another matter entirely. Now that the souring economy has had its way with Yahoo (YHOO) and AMD (AMD) and Palm (PALM) and Sun (JAVA) and Nortel (NT), it&#8217;s moving on to bigger fare. We&#8217;ve already heard predictions that <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20081202/new-from-google-labs-google-layoffs/">Google (GOOG) will sack as much as 15 percent of its workforce</a> next year. Now come rumors that Microsoft (MSFT) is steeling itself for large-scale job cuts as well. &#8220;Come 22 Jan., 2009 Microsoft will be asked by the analysts what it is doing to contain costs,&#8221; <a href="http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2008/12/rumors-of-upcoming-microsoft-cut-backs.html">Microsoft employee-blogger Mini-Microsoft writes</a>. &#8220;And I believe Microsoft will have an answer. I think this is one solution that you don&#8217;t want to be a part of. I&#8217;m all for cutting back, but it should have been done long ago, responsibly, vs. forced upon us.&#8221; He speculates that the ax will swing on Jan. 15, 2009, and will take 10 percent of the company&#8217;s workforce when it does.</p>
<p>Now, Mini-Microsoft is <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_39/b3952009.htm">not an official company blog</a>, and it&#8217;s penned by an <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2003024110_danny28.html">anonymous author</a>. So the layoff rumor it&#8217;s floating should be viewed as just that, a rumor. That said, the blog has long been a clearinghouse for internal information Microsoft would much prefer to keep under wraps&#8211;and a fairly accurate one at that. So it&#8217;s certainly worth paying attention to. As Joe Wilcox writes over at Microsoft Watch, <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/corporate/when_mini_speaks_layoffs_i_believe.html">&#8220;When Mini speaks layoffs, I believe.&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081222/uninstall-microsoft-workforce-service-pack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell Braces for Repeat of 2006 &quot;Big Freeze&quot;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080820/winux/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080820/winux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Allchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Wilcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE Linux Enterprise Server OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=3584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Sept. 1991, Microsoft exec Jim Allchin emailed CEO Bill Gates: “We must slow down Novell. As you said Bill, it has to be dramatic. We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger.” And in 2001 Microsoft Chief Steve Ballmer likened Linux to “cancer.” Later that year, Gates derided open-source licensing models like the one used by Linux as “Pacman-like.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/08/hellfrozenover.jpg" alt="" title="hellfrozenover" width="350" height="194" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3585" />In Sept. 1991, Microsoft exec Jim Allchin emailed CEO Bill Gates: &#8220;We must slow down Novell. As you said, Bill, it has to be dramatic. <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/11/05/kill_novell_allchin_fingers/">We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger.&#8221;</a> And in 2001 Microsoft Chief Steve Ballmer <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/01/1658258.shtml">likened Linux to &#8220;cancer.&#8221;</a> Later that year, Gates <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/20/1249203.shtml">derided open-source licensing models like the one used by Linux as &#8220;Pacman-like.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s some heavy rhetoric. Certainly, it&#8217;s representative of the distaste with which Microsoft (MSFT) has viewed Linux and Linux vendors like Novell (NOVL) for the past decade.</p>
<p>So to hear back in Nov. 2006 that <a href="http://asay.blogspot.com/2006/11/microsoft-and-novell-much-ado-about.html">Microsoft was partnering with Novell</a> to offer <a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/openletter.html">sales support for Novell&#8217;s SUSE Linux <em>and</em> cooperate with its old rival on Linux-Windows interoperability</a> was astonishing&#8211;a bit like discovering that Stalin really sent Trotsky to Mexico for a nice vacation or that Itchy has shacked up with Scratchy.</p>
<p>And the unlikely partnership continues to astonish to this day. On Wednesday, <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/375660_msftnovell20.html">the two companies expanded their interoperability agreement</a>, with Microsoft agreeing to buy and resell up to $100 million in enterprise support subscriptions for Novell&#8217;s SUSE Linux Enterprise Server OS. That&#8217;s in addition to the $240 million Microsoft has already agreed to buy.</p>
<p>Odd, isn&#8217;t it, to see Microsoft marketing Linux like this? Odder still, to see Novell in an alliance with the company that hoped to &#8220;slaughter&#8221; it. So why did Novell agree to it? &#8220;Novell&#8217;s benefit is obvious, if not self-destructive,&#8221; <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/operating_systems/whats_100_million_between_frienemies.html">Joe Wilcox explains over at Microsoft Watch</a>. &#8220;The deal allows Novell to exist in the shadow of Windows Server, sustaining on its table scraps. Microsoft can offer customers that simply must have some Linux servers a sanctioned source for good tools ensuring interoperability with Windows Server.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080820/winux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell Braces for Repeat of 2006 "Big Freeze"</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080820/winux-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080820/winux-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Allchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Wilcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUSE Linux Enterprise Server OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=3584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Sept. 1991, Microsoft exec Jim Allchin emailed CEO Bill Gates: “We must slow down Novell. As you said Bill, it has to be dramatic. We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger.” And in 2001 Microsoft Chief Steve Ballmer likened Linux to “cancer.” Later that year, Gates derided open-source licensing models like the one used by Linux as “Pacman-like.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/08/hellfrozenover.jpg" alt="" title="hellfrozenover" width="350" height="194" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3585" />In Sept. 1991, Microsoft exec Jim Allchin emailed CEO Bill Gates: &#8220;We must slow down Novell. As you said, Bill, it has to be dramatic. <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/11/05/kill_novell_allchin_fingers/">We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger.&#8221;</a> And in 2001 Microsoft Chief Steve Ballmer <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/01/1658258.shtml">likened Linux to &#8220;cancer.&#8221;</a> Later that year, Gates <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/20/1249203.shtml">derided open-source licensing models like the one used by Linux as &#8220;Pacman-like.&#8221;</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s some heavy rhetoric. Certainly, it&#8217;s representative of the distaste with which Microsoft (MSFT) has viewed Linux and Linux vendors like Novell (NOVL) for the past decade.</p>
<p>So to hear back in Nov. 2006 that <a href="http://asay.blogspot.com/2006/11/microsoft-and-novell-much-ado-about.html">Microsoft was partnering with Novell</a> to offer <a href="http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/openletter.html">sales support for Novell&#8217;s SUSE Linux <em>and</em> cooperate with its old rival on Linux-Windows interoperability</a> was astonishing&#8211;a bit like discovering that Stalin really sent Trotsky to Mexico for a nice vacation or that Itchy has shacked up with Scratchy.</p>
<p>And the unlikely partnership continues to astonish to this day. On Wednesday, <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/375660_msftnovell20.html">the two companies expanded their interoperability agreement</a>, with Microsoft agreeing to buy and resell up to $100 million in enterprise support subscriptions for Novell&#8217;s SUSE Linux Enterprise Server OS. That&#8217;s in addition to the $240 million Microsoft has already agreed to buy.</p>
<p>Odd, isn&#8217;t it, to see Microsoft marketing Linux like this? Odder still, to see Novell in an alliance with the company that hoped to &#8220;slaughter&#8221; it. So why did Novell agree to it? &#8220;Novell&#8217;s benefit is obvious, if not self-destructive,&#8221; <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/operating_systems/whats_100_million_between_frienemies.html">Joe Wilcox explains over at Microsoft Watch</a>. &#8220;The deal allows Novell to exist in the shadow of Windows Server, sustaining on its table scraps. Microsoft can offer customers that simply must have some Linux servers a sanctioned source for good tools ensuring interoperability with Windows Server.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080820/winux-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

