<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Nehalem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/nehalem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>AMD Riding Intel&#039;s Coattails, but Will It Last?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100414/amd-riding-intels-coattails-but-will-it-last/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100414/amd-riding-intels-coattails-but-will-it-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Eule</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Eule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auriga USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Berebaum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=23923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shares of Advanced Micro Devices are up with much of the chip sector today, as investors look for ways to play Intel’s strong results.

AMD is scheduled to report its first-quarter Thursday after the close.

Auriga USA analyst Daniel Berenbaum, though, is holding onto a  Sell rating and $6 price target. He cautions investors about making assumptions about broader chip strength.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shares of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) are up with much of the chip sector today, as investors look for ways to play Intel’s (INTC) strong results.</p>
<p>AMD is scheduled to report its first-quarter Thursday after the close.</p>
<p>Auriga USA analyst Daniel Berenbaum, though, is holding onto a  Sell rating and $6 price target. He cautions investors about making assumptions about broader chip strength.</p>
<p>&#8220;We think this risks misinterpreting AMD’s competitive positioning. AMD has gained share in graphics from Nvidia (NVDA)&#8211;good for sales but below corporate average gross margin&#8211;but its CPU roadmap looks weak, particularly in high-ASP/high-margin servers where checks suggest that Intel’s Nehalem product continues to gain market share.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2010/04/14/amd-riding-intel%E2%80%99s-coattails-but-will-it-last/?mod=rss_BOLBlog&#038;mod=tech">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100414/amd-riding-intels-coattails-but-will-it-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMC Poaches Top Intel Exec</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[386]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[486]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrivals departures feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Enterprise Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Tucci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Gelsinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[successor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=24648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thirty years at Intel was evidently more than enough for Pat Gelsinger. He’s giving up his job as senior VP of the company’s Digital Enterprise Group to run EMC’s storage-products operations, The Wall Street Journal reports.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/gelsinger-150x150.jpg" alt="gelsinger" title="gelsinger" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-24649" />Thirty years at Intel was evidently <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/intel-is-said-to-plot-an-executive-overhaul/">more than enough for Pat Gelsinger</a>. He’s giving up his job as senior VP of the company’s Digital Enterprise Group to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125290003881507947.html">run EMC&#8217;s storage-products operations</a>, The Wall Street Journal reports.</p>
<p>The move, which will be effective immediately upon its announcement, is quite a blow for Intel (INTC). Gelsinger had done stints as the company’s chief technology officer and as head of its research division. He helped quarterback Intel&#8217;s 386 and 486 processors, played a major role in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Nehalem">the launch of  Nehalem</a> and had been considered a likely successor to Intel CEO Paul Otellini. Now he’s a contender for the top job at EMC (EMC) when CEO Joe Tucci decides to step down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090914/emc-poaches-top-intel-exec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#039;ve Been Xserved</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090407/youve-been-xserved/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090407/youve-been-xserved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Moody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD boot drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Capsule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workgroup server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide mac Product Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Apple Store went offline earlier this morning and when it returned, its homepage featured not a new 2TB Time Capsule, not an updated Apple TV, but a new Nehalem-based Xserve--the same one the company’s Hong Kong online store accidentally started taking orders for last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/passed_out_xserve.jpg" alt="passed_out_xserve" title="passed_out_xserve" width="200" height="254" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16194" /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/07/apple-store-down-globally/">The Apple Store went offline earlier this morning</a> and when it returned, its homepage featured not <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/2TB-Time-capsule">a new 2TB Time Capsule</a>, not an updated Apple TV, but a new Nehalem-based <a href="http://www.apple.com/xserve/">Xserve</a>&#8211;the same one the company&#8217;s Hong Kong online store <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/04/02/apple.slips.nehalem.xserve/">accidentally started taking orders for last week</a>.</p>
<p>Zzzzzz&#8230;</p>
<p>Not exactly a big surprise. Still, quite a piece of machinery.   Built around Intel&#8217;s (INTC) latest Nehalem Xeon Processors, the new Xserve boasts twice the performance of its predecessor, according to Apple (AAPL). It offers a 128GB SSD boot drive option and up to 3TB of internal storage and RAID 5 support. And it is, according to Apple, the best Xserve the company has ever made. It always is.<br />
 “The Xserve is the best workgroup server for our education, business and creative customers,” <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/04/07xserve.html">David Moody, Apple’s vice president of Worldwide Mac Product Marketing said in a statement</a>. “With up to twice the performance, better power efficiency and an innovative SSD drive option, this is the best Xserve we’ve ever made.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090407/youve-been-xserved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You've Been Xserved</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090407/youve-been-xserved-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090407/youve-been-xserved-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Moody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD boot drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Capsule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workgroup server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide mac Product Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Apple Store went offline earlier this morning and when it returned, its homepage featured not a new 2TB Time Capsule, not an updated Apple TV, but a new Nehalem-based Xserve--the same one the company’s Hong Kong online store accidentally started taking orders for last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/passed_out_xserve.jpg" alt="passed_out_xserve" title="passed_out_xserve" width="200" height="254" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16194" /><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/07/apple-store-down-globally/">The Apple Store went offline earlier this morning</a> and when it returned, its homepage featured not <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/2TB-Time-capsule">a new 2TB Time Capsule</a>, not an updated Apple TV, but a new Nehalem-based <a href="http://www.apple.com/xserve/">Xserve</a>&#8211;the same one the company&#8217;s Hong Kong online store <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/04/02/apple.slips.nehalem.xserve/">accidentally started taking orders for last week</a>. </p>
<p>Zzzzzz&#8230;</p>
<p>Not exactly a big surprise. Still, quite a piece of machinery.   Built around Intel&#8217;s (INTC) latest Nehalem Xeon Processors, the new Xserve boasts twice the performance of its predecessor, according to Apple (AAPL). It offers a 128GB SSD boot drive option and up to 3TB of internal storage and RAID 5 support. And it is, according to Apple, the best Xserve the company has ever made. It always is.<br />
 “The Xserve is the best workgroup server for our education, business and creative customers,” <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/04/07xserve.html">David Moody, Apple’s vice president of Worldwide Mac Product Marketing said in a statement</a>. “With up to twice the performance, better power efficiency and an innovative SSD drive option, this is the best Xserve we’ve ever made.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090407/youve-been-xserved-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac Attack</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090303/mac-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090303/mac-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bargain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Twomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refresh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=14065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={14636606001}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090303/mac-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Overclocks Intel&#039;s Patience</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090218/nvidia-overclocks-intels-patience/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090218/nvidia-overclocks-intels-patience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=13127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tentative sparring between Intel and Nvidia over the terms of their chipset licensing agreement has evolved into a full-on street brawl. Earlier this week, Intel filed suit against Nvidia, seeking a declaratory judgment that would prevent the company from peddling nForce motherboards that support Intel’s new Nehalem-class chips.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/02/rockem-sockem-150x150.jpg" alt="rockem-sockem" title="rockem-sockem" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-13128" />The tentative sparring between Intel and Nvidia over the terms of their chipset licensing agreement has evolved into a full-on street brawl. Earlier this week, Intel filed suit against Nvidia, seeking a declaratory judgment that would prevent the company from peddling nForce motherboards that support Intel&#8217;s new Nehalem-class chips, which feature integrated memory controller functionality. &#8220;The suit seeks to have the court declare that Nvidia is not licensed to produce chipsets that are compatible with any Intel processor that has integrated memory controller functionality, such as Intel’s Nehalem microprocessors and that Nvidia has breached the agreement with Intel by falsely claiming that it is licensed,&#8221; <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2009/02/18/intel-files-lawsuit-against-nvidia/1">Intel said in a statement</a>. &#8220;Intel has been in discussions with Nvidia for more than a year attempting to resolve the matter but unfortunately we were unsuccessful.&#8221;</p>
<p>That, of course, is because Nvidia (NVDA) feels there&#8217;s no need for a resolution. In its opinion, the terms of its licensing agreement with Intel (INTC) do indeed cover the chip giant&#8217;s Nehalem processors and other upcoming chips. And it views Intel&#8217;s claim that the agreement is otherwise as an effort to hamstring Nvidia&#8217;s platform innovations, which Intel sees as a threat to its PC dominance. &#8220;We are confident that our license, as negotiated, applies,&#8221; <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/io_1234956565831.html">said Jen-Hsun Huang, president and CEO of Nvidia</a>. &#8220;At the heart of this issue is that the CPU has run its course and the soul of the PC is shifting quickly to the GPU. This is clearly an attempt to stifle innovation to protect a decaying CPU business.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090218/nvidia-overclocks-intels-patience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Overclocks Intel's Patience</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090218/nvidia-overclocks-intels-patience-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090218/nvidia-overclocks-intels-patience-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=13127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tentative sparring between Intel and Nvidia over the terms of their chipset licensing agreement has evolved into a full-on street brawl. Earlier this week, Intel filed suit against Nvidia, seeking a declaratory judgment that would prevent the company from peddling nForce motherboards that support Intel’s new Nehalem-class chips.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/02/rockem-sockem-150x150.jpg" alt="rockem-sockem" title="rockem-sockem" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-13128" />The tentative sparring between Intel and Nvidia over the terms of their chipset licensing agreement has evolved into a full-on street brawl. Earlier this week, Intel filed suit against Nvidia, seeking a declaratory judgment that would prevent the company from peddling nForce motherboards that support Intel&#8217;s new Nehalem-class chips, which feature integrated memory controller functionality. &#8220;The suit seeks to have the court declare that Nvidia is not licensed to produce chipsets that are compatible with any Intel processor that has integrated memory controller functionality, such as Intel’s Nehalem microprocessors and that Nvidia has breached the agreement with Intel by falsely claiming that it is licensed,&#8221; <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2009/02/18/intel-files-lawsuit-against-nvidia/1">Intel said in a statement</a>. &#8220;Intel has been in discussions with Nvidia for more than a year attempting to resolve the matter but unfortunately we were unsuccessful.&#8221;</p>
<p>That, of course, is because Nvidia (NVDA) feels there&#8217;s no need for a resolution. In its opinion, the terms of its licensing agreement with Intel (INTC) do indeed cover the chip giant&#8217;s Nehalem processors and other upcoming chips. And it views Intel&#8217;s claim that the agreement is otherwise as an effort to hamstring Nvidia&#8217;s platform innovations, which Intel sees as a threat to its PC dominance. &#8220;We are confident that our license, as negotiated, applies,&#8221; <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/io_1234956565831.html">said Jen-Hsun Huang, president and CEO of Nvidia</a>. &#8220;At the heart of this issue is that the CPU has run its course and the soul of the PC is shifting quickly to the GPU. This is clearly an attempt to stifle innovation to protect a decaying CPU business.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090218/nvidia-overclocks-intels-patience-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel: There&#039;s a Multi-Function Chip in Your Future</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090205/intel-theres-a-multi-function-chip-in-your-future/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090205/intel-theres-a-multi-function-chip-in-your-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Solid-State Circuits Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miniaturization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems on a chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trash-talking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=8290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tech companies use trade shows to hawk products to customers and the press. But technical conferences are where some of the most intense trash-talking happens, disguised in arcane papers that let engineers boast about their prowess to peers from competing companies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech companies use trade shows to hawk products to customers and the press. But technical conferences are where some of the most intense trash-talking happens, disguised in arcane papers that let engineers boast about their prowess to peers from competing companies.</p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s (INTC) latest papers at the annual International Solid-State Circuits Conference, which starts Sunday in San Francisco, are a case in point. The company is using the event to show off new details of the inner workings of some previously discussed chips, including an eight-processor version of a product called Nehalem that Intel plans to begin selling for use in server systems later this year.</p>
<p>But Intel&#8217;s broader point is that miniaturization is reaching a point that many new kinds of functions can economically be squeezed on individual pieces of silicon, creating new opportunities to sell what the industry calls systems on a chip, or SOCs.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/02/05/intel-theres-a-multi-function-chip-in-your-future/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090205/intel-theres-a-multi-function-chip-in-your-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast&#039;s Courtroom Drama</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080905/comcasts-courtroom-drama/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080905/comcasts-courtroom-drama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Olds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L3 cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1775769360}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080905/comcasts-courtroom-drama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast's Courtroom Drama</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080905/comcasts-courtroom-drama-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080905/comcasts-courtroom-drama-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Olds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L3 cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nehalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xeon processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=4554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1775769360}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080905/comcasts-courtroom-drama-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
