Amid mounting anger about the capability, at least two are resisting. Fox and NBC both said Wednesday they won’t accept ads promoting the satellite-TV operator’s new digital video recorder that contains the ad-skipping capability.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

Early expectations are that TV networks will win an increase in total ad commitments for the fall season in the coming weeks of negotiations with advertisers known as the upfront. Yet, some big marketers, including General Motors Co. GM -2.71% and Samsung Electronic Co.’s mobile arm, say they are planning to shift some of their TV budgets to the Web.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

According to Bloomberg, T-Mobile has hired TAP Advisors to explore a sale, which could raise as much as $3 billion. T-Mobile has about 7,000 U.S. towers, the fifth-largest collection.

In a statement to AllThingsD, T-Mobile said a tower sale remains under consideration.

“T-Mobile USA continues to evaluate a tower sale as part of its self-funding strategy, but (we) have no specific plans to detail at this time,” the company said.

After failing to sell itself last year to AT&T, T-Mobile is now looking to go it alone. Parent Deutsche Telekom has said the company will spend $4 billion over the coming years to upgrade the T-Mobile network to support LTE.

The move involves reusing current spectrum as well as spectrum gained as part of the breakup fee paid by AT&T after regulators blocked the acquisition.

T-Mobile said last week it was cutting at least 1,900 call center jobs as part of a series of restructuring moves it plans to make.

First it was the baggage fees, and charging for legroom. Then it was denying us our Words with Friends. Now, the New York Times reports, it’s bringing Facebook and LinkedIn to the seat-selection process, so you can gather more information on customers … I mean, pair up fliers with similar interests.

Soon enough, we’ll hear people’s no-longer-serendipitous tales of purposely meeting their soul mate, or maybe selling their company to the passenger in seat 24E.

I’ve got one word for you, airlines, or really, one word that’s used twice to create another single word: GoGo. Wasn’t it just a few years ago that Internet broadband access became an in-flight possibility, allowing us to bury our heads in laptop screens, plow through work while 30,000 feet above the ground, and effectively avoid human interaction? Even the subject at the top of the Times story, Jeff Jarvis, grumbles that he usually has work to do.

And now, you want us to talk to people while we fly? (How does one do that, anyway?)

In case you missed the story, KLM Airlines and others have recently integrated aspects of social media with customer profiles, allowing prospective passengers to share personal information and choose seat buddies based on their profiles.

Sharing the social info is completely optional, and if a customer is uncomfortable with the person who has chosen to sit next to him or her, the seat can be changed up until two days before the flight.

As the story points out, this is likely to appeal to business travelers who are interested in real-life networking, not just social networking.

On one hand, providing more personal info to airlines could help them tailor the flight experience to suit fliers’ preferences, going beyond just the standard meal selection.

And one of the services mentioned, Hong Kong-based Satisfly, lets fliers indicate their preferred level of chattiness during a flight. So the tired mom might not get the talk-shop guy, and maybe the fearful flier won’t get paired with another white-knuckler. (In the videogaming world, I’m told, multiplayer gamers find this kind of feature to be invaluable when they create profiles, so jabberers and silent Halo-ers can peacefully coexist.)

But allowing fliers to handpick their seatmates based on social profiling could also have its pitfalls. As Jarvis aptly says, “Pity the poor venture capitalist who gets seated with the start-up guy who talks his ear off for four hours.”

Which might present another opportunity for airlines: Charge extra for high-tech noise-canceling headphones …

Readers, what do you think? Would you use a social networks to choose a seatmate on a flight, or opt not to share your profile?

(Photo courtesy of Flickr)

Notice I said “TV industry.”

Most observers and analysts believe that Siri’s voice commands could eliminate the need for those clunky TV remote controls. With the blurring and exponential proliferation of television and Web content, telling your TV what you’d like to watch, instead of scrolling through a nearly infinite number of program possibilities, makes a lot more sense.

But from my perspective, Siri’s greatest impact won’t ultimately be on users, or on device manufacturers (though they certainly risk losing market share to Apple). It will be on the TV industry’s content creators and packagers. Why? Because a voice-controlled television interface will fundamentally disrupt the six-decade-old legacy structure of networks, channels and programs. And that’s a legacy that — until now, at least — has been carried forward from analog to digital.

There’s an important underlying precedent here.

If the Internet can be generalized to have one effect across every industry that moves online, that effect would be disaggregation. Choices go from finite to infinite. Navigation goes from sequential to random access. And audiences choose content by the item far more than by the collection. We’ve gone from the packaged and channelized to the unbound and itemized. Autonomous albums are fragmented into songs; series into clips; and magazines and newspapers into articles and individual photos.

As much as we may think that has already happened with video, it is nothing compared to the great leveling that will occur in the voice-controlled living room. Voice-controlled TV means direct navigation to individual episodes, programs and clips. And it will almost certainly lead to a discernible deconstruction of the network and channel structure — not to mention the decomposition of even the aggregated marketplaces like Netflix, Hulu and YouTube.

Here’s the simple reason: No one is going to sit on their couch and say, “Siri, show me NBC’s ‘Community.’” In a voice-activated world, monikers like “NBC” become useless. They don’t stand for anything meaningful to the consumer. They’re just remnants of a decrepit channel structure that’s unraveling. And, in the end, they’ll simply connote the fast-fading allure of mid-20th century mass appeal.

To be sure, the TV majors will lose much of their ability to realize network effects. Already, you’re hearing less about “lead in” and “lead out.” What you are hearing more about, however, is disconnected videos. A program on YouTube, for instance, will sit on a level voice-controlled playing field with an NBC show, and that field will soon become even more level, because Siri will eliminate the menus that structure the artificial hierarchies of content collections.

So how will we be able to get network effects back in video? Let’s look at four possible ways:

• Branded Content — Players can build a strong brand that stands for something with their audiences. Break.com, Discovery and Oprah are all meaningful and build long-term customer loyalty. (“Siri, show me new TED Talks.”)
• Curation — Brand the collection with a curation strategy so that the curator’s name and stamp of approval means something to the audience. (“Siri, show me Jason Hirschhorn’s latest movie suggestions.”)
• Social — In the fully social world that we expect to see, focusing on the virality of content means you tap the human distribution network and social operating system. (“Siri, show me what videos my friends are watching.”)
• Personal — We’ve already seen the extraordinary value of well-tuned personalized recommendations, with Netflix’s notable prize and other famed stories of the benefits of great recommendations. Increasingly, our own patterns of individual videos and the brands we affiliate with, along with recommendations from friends, will be combined into personalized recommendations we won’t even have to ask for. I have no doubt that Siri will be as good a “Genius” as iTunes is at recommending what else to watch. Ultimately, in the age of data, whoever knows the most about us will be able to give us the best experience.

Beyond disaggregation, personalization is ultimately the most powerful consumer value of digital media. My mother’s TV experience was to walk over to her TV set and turn a dial to select among three channels to satisfy her individuality. But in the next generation, no two people will receive the same recommendations from the millions of content choices available.

Before he died, Jobs now famously told Walter Isaacson, his biographer, that he had finally cracked the TV code. It’s unclear what Jobs meant, what this entailed or what he thought it would lead to in the years to come. So, barring further posthumous disclosure, Jobs’s own predictions of his ripple effects will be a media mystery for now.

One thing that’s clear, though, is that Jobs’s Siri will start the dismantling — or creative destruction — of the TV industry as we’ve known it for the last 60 years.

This post originally stated that Siri was unveiled the day after Steve Jobs passed away. It’s been corrected to reflect that the announcement actually occurred the day before.

Ben Elowitz (@elowitz) is co-founder and CEO of Wetpaint, a next-generation media company that is reinventing the media model on the social web. Ben is also author of Digital Quarters, a blog about the future of digital media. Prior to Wetpaint, Elowitz co-founded Blue Nile (NILE).

I was on the phone with its two founders: Alon Maor, CEO; and Dan Sahar, VP of marketing. They had just started telling me about how they plan to sell network appliances that network operators — like, say, Comcast or Time Warner or Verizon — might put on their network in order to help them meet the growing demand for video content. The aim, Maor told me, is to get the most popular content as close as you can to the customer.

The first thing that popped into my mind was creating an appliance that sits on the network; close to, but not in the customer’s house. Maybe in the nearest network hub or central office. It turns out I was right. Then I wondered aloud what Qwilt might be using as storage technology. Could it be, maybe … flash memory? The chips that have so revolutionized the data centers of companies like Facebook and Apple and the banking systems of Credit Suisse, among others, when put to use by the likes of Fusion-io and Violin Technology?

Why yes, it does use flash memory, they told me, making them the latest member of the steadily growing “Flash Madness” club, which gives me yet another excuse to use the image taken from the cover of Flash Comics #1, circa 1940. For reference, the other members are Fusion, Violin Memory and Pure Storage.

Maor and Sahar laughed on the other end of the line at my guesses. “Would you like a job in our engineering department?” Sahar kidded me. I didn’t answer, because I wasn’t done guessing things like how Qwilt does what it does. “You must use some kind of algorithm to figure out what’s popular,” I said. Right again, mostly. The interview hadn’t been going for as much as five minutes, and I hadn’t even asked a single question and pretty much had it all figured out.

Well, not everything. There was the small matter of funding. Qwilt has raised $24 million in two rounds from Accel Partners, Redpoint Ventures and the Crescent Point Group, a fund based in Singapore. Maor is a Cisco veteran who got absorbed into that company following its $200 million acquisition of P-Cube. Before that, he was an engineer at Seabridge, which is now known as Nokia Siemens Networks. Sahar was director of marketing at Crescendo Networks, now part of F5 Networks. Tom Dyal, a Redpoint partner, is on Qwilt’s board.

Video is so popular with consumers that Internet services providers are struggling to get their networks scaled up to meet the demand, Maor says. The traditional way to solve that problem when everyone is watching the same show on Hulu, or the same movie on Netflix, is to just add routers and pray. That’s expensive. What if you could add some extra piece of gear that works with the existing network infrastructure? If you could figure out what was the most popular show in a particular neighborhood, make a copy of it right in that very neighborhood, and deliver it from there rather than all the way back from Hulu’s or Netflix’s data center, you’d lessen the network’s burden.

So that’s exactly what Qwilt does: It has three patents pending on processes for determining what video applications are being used on a network, and for figuring out what content is most popular in a particular area. So if you’re in a neighborhood full of “Jersey Shore” fans, the Qwilt box would figure that fairly quickly, and keep copies of it close at hand so that everyone gets their required daily dose of Snooki.

Also on Qwilt’s board is Rich Wong of Accel; Peter Wagner, an independent board member who has previously worked at Accel; Ohad Finkelstein, a partner at Crescent Point; and Giora Yaron, the former chairman of Mercury Interactive, which is now part of Hewlett-Packard. Also investing is Rob Glaser, the former CEO of RealNetworks.

Got all that? I told you it was an easy interview.

I think networks are a thing of the past. I don’t know anybody under 30 who is watching television the way I watched television. Technology has allowed people to change the way they consume the news, and we want to be where people are going.

Former Fox commentator Glenn Beck, whose first show airs Monday on his Internet-only GBTV channel

“The number of these networked devices has skyrocketed in the past two years,” said Don Bailey, of cyber-security firm iSec Partners, who has been studying the vulnerability problem along with colleague Mathew Solnik. “They aren’t just in automotive systems but in security systems, industrial control systems, medical devices.”

At a conference in August the two iSec researchers demonstrated how they could unlock and start a car by sending certain text messages to the car’s alarm system. The researchers said the real problem isn’t the possibility that hackers will start stealing cars. The ramifications are much broader. The same basic approach could be used by hackers to disrupt businesses or vital services.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

FCC: TIPS FOR HOW TO COMMUNICATE DURING AN EMERGENCY

1. Limit non-emergency phone calls. This will minimize network congestion, free up “space” on the network for emergency communications and conserve battery power if you are using a wireless phone;
2. Keep all phone calls brief. If you need to use a phone, try to use it only to convey vital information to emergency personnel and/or family;
3. Try text messaging, also known as short messaging service (SMS) when using your wireless phone. In many cases text messages will go through when your call may not. It will also help free up more “space” for emergency communications on the telephone network;
4. If possible try a variety of communications services if you are unsuccessful in getting through with one. For example, if you are unsuccessful in getting through on your wireless phone, try a messaging capability like text messaging or email. Alternatively, try a landline phone if one is available. This will help spread the communications demand over multiple networks and should reduce overall congestion;
5. Wait 10 seconds before redialing a call. On many wireless handsets, to re-dial a number, you simply push “send” after you’ve ended a call to redial the previous number. If you do this too quickly, the data from the handset to the cell sites do not have enough time to clear before you’ve resent the same data. This contributes to a clogged network;
6. Have charged batteries and car-charger adapters available for backup power for your wireless phone;
7. Maintain a list of emergency phone numbers in your phone;
8. If in your vehicle, try to place calls while your vehicle is stationary;
9. Have a family communications plan in place. Designate someone out of the area as a central contact, and make certain all family members know who to contact if they become separated;
10. If you have Call Forwarding on your home number, forward your home number to your wireless number in the event of an evacuation. That way you will get incoming calls from your land line phone;
11. After the storm has passed, if you lose power in your home, try using your car to charge cell phones or listen to news alerts on the car radio. But be careful – don’t try to reach your car if it is not safe to do so, and remain vigilant about carbon monoxide emissions from your car if it is a closed space, such as a garage.
12. Tune-in to broadcast and radio news for important news alerts.

More information on emergency communications during Hurricane Irene from the FCC can be found here. Residents can also find more information at ready.gov, the Red Cross or FEMA.

That battle between the old and new ways of watching TV is putting networks and studios in a tricky position — balancing a new, growing online market for shows with a traditional market that is facing new threats and still accounts for the lion’s share of revenues.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

U.S. TV networks marked the official end of the TV season on Wednesday with a flurry of widely viewed send-offs, including the last episode of “The Oprah Winfrey Show” and the season finale of “American Idol.” But those big programs are closing out a TV season in which few new shows became hits, and ratings for the four most-watched networks fell.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »