<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; neutral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/neutral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 14:31:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Video: Sean Parker on No Victoria&#039;s Secret Models in Silicon Valley (What?!?!)</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110124/video-sean-parker-on-no-victoria-secret-models-in-silicon-valley-what/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110124/video-sean-parker-on-no-victoria-secret-models-in-silicon-valley-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Falstaff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Timberlake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Social Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=39863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is former Napster troublemaker, former Facebook consigliere and current investor, entrepreneur and movie subject Sean Parker onstage at the DLD conference in Munich, Germany, yesterday.

It was vintage Parker, who always tries to paint himself as more of a geek than the multicolored life of the digital party. In truth, he is very much both.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is former Napster troublemaker, former Facebook consigliere and current investor, entrepreneur and movie subject Sean Parker onstage at the DLD conference in Munich, Germany, yesterday.</p>
<p>It was vintage Parker, who always tries to paint himself as more of a geek than the multicolored life of the digital party. In truth, he is very much both.</p>
<p>In these clips, he talks about the fabrications in the movie &#8220;The Social Network,&#8221; in which Justin Timberlake played him as a hyperactive version of Falstaff.</p>
<p>Parker thought the character was &#8220;morally reprehensible,&#8221; although that&#8217;s what made him so fun to watch.</p>
<p>Parker also took issue with other creative liberties about the social networking site in the movie and noted that the film was &#8220;a complete work of fiction.&#8221;</p>
<p>As an example, he pointed out how there are &#8220;no Victoria&#8217;s Secret models in Silicon Valley&#8221; as there were in &#8220;The Social Network.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kidding! Hollywood glamorized the nerdtastic tech scene in order to make it more exciting to audiences? I cannot <em>believe</em> it!</p>
<p>(And, frankly, Parker seems to be enjoying the attention as much as he does tweaking the film.)</p>
<p>Parker also talked about Facebook being a neutral platform, making a much more interesting observation about what the true power of CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg really is.</p>
<p>Enjoy:</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=1C22E9F4-D33D-4BDC-8F8C-E98D7B763294&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1C22E9F4-D33D-4BDC-8F8C-E98D7B763294}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110124/video-sean-parker-on-no-victoria-secret-models-in-silicon-valley-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint Undervalued by as Much as 50 Percent? Keep Dreaming&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091208/sprint-undervalued/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091208/sprint-undervalued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBITDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expectation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pali Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-paid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prepaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prospects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upside potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Piecyk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=30446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Sprint, as Barron’s recently claimed, deserves more respect on Wall Street, it’s not going to find it at Pali Research, which clearly does not see the same 50 percent upside potential in the company’s shares. In a note to investors this morning, Pali analyst Walter Piecyk says he’s not buying predictions about Sprint returning to growth in 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/sprint_down.jpg" alt="sprint_down" title="sprint_down" width="157" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-30447" />If Sprint, <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125998006760077993.html">as Barron’s recently claimed</a>, deserves more respect on Wall Street, it’s not going to find it at Pali Research, which clearly does not see the same 50 percent upside potential in the company’s shares. </p>
<p>In a note to investors this morning, Pali analyst Walter Piecyk says he’s not buying predictions about Sprint (S) returning to growth in 2010. Sure, the company is improving post-paid subscriber losses, says Piecyk, but not as quickly as it needs to. And its prepaid business, which already faces a fair bit of competition, will be confronted with even more competition next year.</p>
<p>&#8220;Over the past six months our concerns have been rising over the slow pace of change at Sprint and what we view as lost opportunities for growth, but we maintained our Buy rating due to the low valuation on the stock and the depressed expectations of investors,&#8221; Piecyk writes. </p>
<p>&#8220;Those concerns increased in recent months as the pre-paid business, which Sprint has been accessing for growth, became more competitive and Verizon began executing on a more open device strategy,&#8221; the analyst adds. &#8220;In the past few weeks, investors have become more optimistic about positive post-paid signs early in Q4 and Sprint’s prospects of even stronger pre-paid results in 2010, in the face of increasing competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>In contrast, Piecyk notes that &#8220;We are less confident about those trends and as we model out a more competitive market in 2010 for all our companies it becomes evident to us that Sprint will be challenged to stabilize EBITDA. Faced with negative catalysts in the months ahead and the challenge of appropriately valuing a company whose EBITDA is in perpetual decline, we believe now is the right time to downgrade the stock to Neutral.&#8221; </p>
<p>Wall Street, then, isn’t underestimating Sprint’s prospects for 2010. It’s overestimating them&#8211;or at least <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aLOTs3wQzuUM"> it certainly was yesterday</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;For 2010, we expect post-paid losses to be pared by 35% to 2.3 million subs lost compared to our prior estimate of less than 2 million subs lost in that year,&#8221; Piecyk concludes. &#8220;While pre-paid net adds might offset the losses or even top post-paid losses in Q4 we expect the total customer base to decline by 700,000 in 2010.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091208/sprint-undervalued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, One More Thing&#8230;Goldman Sachs, You&#039;re DEAD to Me</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/oh-one-more-thing-goldman-sachs-youre-dead-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/oh-one-more-thing-goldman-sachs-youre-dead-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Bailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple may not have yet succumbed to the economic malaise that hangs heavy over consumer tech, but it will soon. According to Goldman Sachs, anyway. This morning Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey downgraded Apple’s stock to neutral from a buy, claiming the company will suffer when consumers continue to rein in spending next year. Worse, it won't uncrate a magical new product category at Macworld.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/onemorething.jpg" alt="" title="onemorething" width="219" height="109" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9680" />Apple may not have yet succumbed to the economic malaise that hangs heavy over consumer tech, but it will soon. According to Goldman Sachs, anyway. This morning Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asz.tfA4wL00&amp;refer=home">downgraded Apple&#8217;s stock to neutral from a buy</a>, claiming the company will suffer when consumers continue to rein in spending next year. &#8220;Although our checks in Asia for the December quarter were better for Apple than for the other PC and smartphone vendors, some nicks have started to emerge,&#8221; Bailey wrote. &#8220;Specifically, shipments of MacBooks, iPod nanos, and iPhone were all slightly lower than what was expected going into the quarter and Apple should face a tougher environment in the March and June quarters as consumer demand takes another leg down.&#8221;</p>
<p>A disheartening prediction. And to make matters worse, Bailey speculates that Apple (AAPL) won&#8217;t unveil any new product categories at MacWorld come January, and because of that won&#8217;t see the sort of near-term pop it typically experiences after the introduction of a compelling new product. Said Bailey, &#8220;[The] nearer-term outlook is less positive, as it now looks unlikely that Apple will launch a new product category at MacWorld in early January, taking away a potential catalyst for the shares and causing Apple to try to generate demand in a tough environment without the benefit of a new offering in the first part of 2009.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=AAPL">Apple shares</a> closed at $94.75, down 3.58 percent for the day on the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/oh-one-more-thing-goldman-sachs-youre-dead-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, One More Thing&#8230;Goldman Sachs, You're DEAD to Me</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/oh-one-more-thing-goldman-sachs-youre-dead-to-me-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/oh-one-more-thing-goldman-sachs-youre-dead-to-me-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Bailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[December]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple may not have yet succumbed to the economic malaise that hangs heavy over consumer tech, but it will soon. According to Goldman Sachs, anyway. This morning Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey downgraded Apple’s stock to neutral from a buy, claiming the company will suffer when consumers continue to rein in spending next year. Worse, it won't uncrate a magical new product category at Macworld.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/onemorething.jpg" alt="" title="onemorething" width="219" height="109" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9680" />Apple may not have yet succumbed to the economic malaise that hangs heavy over consumer tech, but it will soon. According to Goldman Sachs, anyway. This morning Goldman Sachs analyst David Bailey <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asz.tfA4wL00&amp;refer=home">downgraded Apple&#8217;s stock to neutral from a buy</a>, claiming the company will suffer when consumers continue to rein in spending next year. &#8220;Although our checks in Asia for the December quarter were better for Apple than for the other PC and smartphone vendors, some nicks have started to emerge,&#8221; Bailey wrote. &#8220;Specifically, shipments of MacBooks, iPod nanos, and iPhone were all slightly lower than what was expected going into the quarter and Apple should face a tougher environment in the March and June quarters as consumer demand takes another leg down.&#8221; </p>
<p>A disheartening prediction. And to make matters worse, Bailey speculates that Apple (AAPL) won&#8217;t unveil any new product categories at MacWorld come January, and because of that won&#8217;t see the sort of near-term pop it typically experiences after the introduction of a compelling new product. Said Bailey, &#8220;[The] nearer-term outlook is less positive, as it now looks unlikely that Apple will launch a new product category at MacWorld in early January, taking away a potential catalyst for the shares and causing Apple to try to generate demand in a tough environment without the benefit of a new offering in the first part of 2009.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=AAPL">Apple shares</a> closed at $94.75, down 3.58 percent for the day on the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/oh-one-more-thing-goldman-sachs-youre-dead-to-me-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

