<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; New Establishment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/new-establishment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Zuckerberg Tops Vanity Fair's "New Establishment" List Again (And Look Who's No. 40)</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110831/zuckerberg-tops-vanity-fairs-new-establishment-list-again-and-look-whos-no-40/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110831/zuckerberg-tops-vanity-fairs-new-establishment-list-again-and-look-whos-no-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AllThingsD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angry Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hall of Fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoodie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.K. Rowling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Dorsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Ive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Timberlake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kingmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Andreessen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minetta Tavern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mogul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powers That Be]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=115997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vanity Fair magazine put out its high-profile "New Establishment" list of the top 50 people -- and guess who made the cut from tech?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110831/zuckerberg-tops-vanity-fairs-new-establishment-list-again-and-look-whos-no-40/vf-copy/" rel="attachment wp-att-116005"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/08/vf-copy-500x480.png" alt="" title="vf copy" width="500" height="480" class="alignright size-large wp-image-116005" /></a></p>
<p>Vanity Fair magazine put out its high-profile &#8220;New Establishment&#8221; list of the top 50 people, who are &#8220;an innovative new breed of buccaneering visionaries, engineering prodigies, and entrepreneurs, who quite often sport hoodies, floppy hair, and backpacks.&#8221;</p>
<p>The hoodie part would be referring to Facebook CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg, who topped the list &#8212; which is in the just-released October issue &#8212; for the second year in a row. </p>
<p>The Vanity Fair list was packed with Silicon Valley luminaries.</p>
<p>The No. 2 spot went to the hopelessly conjoined twins at Google, CEO Larry Page and his co-founder Sergey Brin. Amazon&#8217;s Jeff Bezos was No. 3, followed by newly born CEO Tim Cook and top product guy Jonathan Ive of Apple at No. 4, with Twitter creator and Square founder Jack Dorsey at No. 5.</p>
<p>Interestingly, super-VCs Mark Andreessen and Ben Horowitz clocked in this year at No. 6. </p>
<p>The digitally fast-forward Lady Gaga was the top woman on the list at No. 9, in front of &#8220;Harry Potter&#8221; author J. K. Rowling at No. 16.</p>
<p>And, clocking in at No. 40? Why, me and my partner-in-crime at <strong>AllThingsD</strong>, Walt Mossberg. He is apparently a &#8220;kingmaker&#8221; of tech and I do &#8220;juicy exclusives.&#8221;</p>
<p>That actually is pretty accurate. More importantly, we were ranked higher than Justin Timberlake and Ashton Kutcher. In other words: <em>Mission accomplished!</em> </p>
<p>We also beat the Angry Birds dudes at No. 49, whom my two kids would nonetheless have voted tops over their mom any day of the week and twice on Sunday. </p>
<p>In addition, Vanity Fair broke off a list of 25 &#8220;Powers That Be,&#8221; which is made up of a lot of longtime &#8220;New Establishment&#8221; folks, as well as another list called the &#8220;Hall of Fame.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These are the people who have shaped the world we live in today &#8212; and continue to wield enormous influence,&#8221; said Vanity Fair, which translates into <em>dustier</em> moguls. </p>
<p>Topping the powers-that-be, of course, is Apple&#8217;s co-founder and Chairman Steve Jobs. And outgone Google CEO and now Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt is now enshrined in the hall of fame.</p>
<p>As Walt and I head to a good table at the Minetta Tavern to meet the cool peeps for a celebratory drink, here is the official press releases from Vanity Fair: </p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>FACEBOOK FOUNDER MARK ZUCKERBERG TOPS VANITY FAIR&#8217;S NEW ESTABLISHMENT LIST FOR THE SECOND YEAR IN A ROW</p>
<p>Sergey Brin and Larry Page Take No. 2 Spot, Lady Gaga Jumps to the Top 10 of Tech-Dominant List</p>
<p>NEW YORK, N.Y. &#8212; &#8220;The Age of Information gives way to a burgeoning Age of Technology,&#8221; announces Graydon Carter, remarking on the &#8220;seismic shift in interest and influence&#8221; that has occurred in the 17 years that Vanity Fair has been ranking America’s power players. The magazine&#8217;s 2011 New Establishment list identifies the top 50 of an innovative new breed of buccaneering visionaries, engineering prodigies, and entrepreneurs, who quite often sport hoodies, floppy hair, and backpacks.  </p>
<p>Mark Zuckerberg, founder of the inescapable social-networking site Facebook, maintains his perch at the top of Vanity Fair&#8217;s 17th annual New Establishment List ranking for the second year in a row. With a possible I.P.O. on the horizon by 2012, which could value the company anywhere between $50 and $100 billion, Facebook has enough clout to worry even the unshakable Google. Zuckerberg is still the youngest person ever to top the list.</p>
<p>Sergey Brin and Larry Page, co-founders of Google, are in the No. 2 spot this year, closing in on Zuckerberg as they jump up one spot, from No. 3 in 2010. Eric Schmidt, who appeared on the list last year with the duo, has since been pushed out of the C.E.O&#8217;s office, replaced by Page. Despite reports of an anti-trust investigation, Google has been setting its sites on Facebook by concentrating on strategic initiatives, such as engineering social-networking features. </p>
<p>Rounding out the top five are Jeff Bezos, of Amazon, at No. 3, Tim Cook and Jonathan Ive, of Apple, at No. 4, and Twitter and Square founder Jack Dorsey, at No. 5. </p>
<p>Lady Gaga makes an appearance for the second year in a row. Coming in at No. 9, she is the highest-ranking woman on the list, in front of J. K. Rowling at No. 16, Sheryl Sandberg, of Facebook, at No. 26, Angela Ahrendts with Christopher Bailey, of Burberry, at No. 30, Natalie Massenet at No. 32, and Kara Swisher with Walt Mossberg at No. 40. At 25 years old, Gaga is also the youngest person on the list &#8212; not a surprise for someone whose fans managed to crash Amazon&#8217;s servers in their desperation to download her third album. </p>
<p>Youthful energy is spread throughout this year&#8217;s list with 15 members under the age of 40, including Zuckerberg, Brin and Page, Dorsey, Lady Gaga, Andrew Mason, Sean Parker, Ryan Kavanaugh, Jeremy Stoppelman, Ashton Kutcher, Dennis Crowley, Daniel Ek, Mikael Hed and Niklas Hed, and Justin Timberlake. </p>
<p>There are 14 billionaires on the list: Zuckerberg, Brin and Page, Bezos, Mark Pincus, Michael Moritz, J. K. Rowling, Jim Breyer, Reid Hoffman, Herbert Allen III, Yuri Milner, Robin Li, Parker, and Peter Thiel. </p>
<p>Five member of the New Establishment are actively involved in space exploration, including Brin, Elon Musk, Bezos, Thiel, and Dennis Crowley. Eight of the New Establishment nominees can count themselves members of the ever growing Stanford Mafia; they include Brin, Page, Reed Hastings, Jim Breyer, Hoffman, Musk, Thiel, and John Hennessy. </p>
<p>The New Establishment, Vanity Fair&#8217;s annual ranking of the top leaders of our time, is made up of owners, creators, buyers, thinkers, and innovators &#8212; the movers and shakers in the worlds of technology, media, business, politics, entertainment, and fashion. These men and women are the taste-makers and trendsetters, opinion formers and agenda creators, not to mention empire builders. Entry into the ranks of Vanity Fair&#8217;s list is based on a number of factors: wealth, influence, and philanthropy, as well as such intangibles as vision and the x factor. </p>
<p>The October issue of Vanity Fair will be on newsstands in New York and L.A. on September 1, and nationally and on the iPad September 6.</p>
<p>THE VANITY FAIR NEW ESTABLISHMENT</p>
<p>1.    Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook<br />
2.    Sergey Brin and Larry Page, Google<br />
3.    Jeff Bezos, Amazon<br />
4.    Tim Cook and Jonathan Ive, Apple<br />
5.    Jack Dorsey, Square, Twitter<br />
6.    Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, Andreessen Horowitz<br />
7.    Reed Hastings, Netflix<br />
8.    John Lasseter, Pixar, Walt Disney Animation Studios<br />
9.    Lady Gaga, singer<br />
10.  Dan Doctoroff, Bloomberg L.P.<br />
11.  Dick Costolo, Twitter<br />
12.  Mark Pincus, Zynga<br />
13.  Jim Breyer, Accel Partners<br />
14.  Tim Burton, Johnny Depp, and Graham King, Movies<br />
15.  Michael Moritz, Sequoia Capital<br />
16.  J. K. Rowling, Harry Potter<br />
17.  Trey Parker and Matt Stone, South Park<br />
18.  Reid Hoffman, Greylock Partners, LinkedIn<br />
19.  Herb Allen III, Allen &#038; Co.<br />
20.  Judd Apatow, Apatow Productions<br />
21.  Jay-Z, Roc Nation<br />
22.  Todd Phillips, Green Hat Films<br />
23.  Yuri Milner, DST Global<br />
24.  J. J. Abrams, writer, director, producer<br />
25.  Robin Li, Baidu<br />
26.  Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook<br />
27.  Andrew Mason, Groupon<br />
28.  Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, television<br />
29.  Mark Wahlberg and Stephen Levinson, Leverage<br />
30.  Angela Ahrendts and Christopher Bailey, Burberry<br />
31.  Elon Musk, Tesla Motors, Space X<br />
32.  Natalie Massenet, Net-a-Porter Group<br />
33.  Paul Graham, Y Combinator<br />
34.  Sean Parker, entrepreneur<br />
35.  Fred Wilson, Union Square Ventures, Flatiron Partners<br />
36.  Peter Thiel, Founders Fund, Clarium Capital Management<br />
37.  Peter Jackson, Wingnut Films<br />
38.  Ryan Kavanaugh, Relativity Media<br />
39.  Mike Allen, Politico<br />
40.  Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher, All Things D<br />
41.  John Hennessy, Stanford University<br />
42.  Jeremy Stoppelman, Yelp<br />
43.  Ashton Kutcher, actor, investor<br />
44.  Tyler Perry, director, producer, writer, actor<br />
45.  Dennis Crowley, Foursquare<br />
46.  Kevin Ryan, Gilt Groupe<br />
47.  Daniel Ek, Spotify<br />
48.  Henry Blodget, Business Insider<br />
49.  Mikael Hed, Niklas Hed, and Peter Vesterbacka, Rovio<br />
50.  Justin Timberlake, singer, actor</p></blockquote>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>STEVE JOBS HOLDS THE TOP SPOT ON VANITY FAIR&#8217;S LIST OF THE POWERS THAT BE</p>
<p>Embattled News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch in the Top 5</p>
<p>NEW YORK, N.Y. &#8212; This year Vanity Fair inaugurates a list of the Powers That Be. These are the people who have shaped the world we live in today &#8212; and continue to wield enormous influence. Many are longtime New Establishment members, and their destinies are intertwined with the members of this year’s New Establishment.</p>
<p>Steve Jobs, of Apple, holds the top spot on the list of the Powers That Be. Since Jobs took control of the company 14 years ago, the stock’s share price has risen more than 6,500 percent. At the height of the debt crisis in late July, Apple had more cash on hand than the U.S. government. </p>
<p>Bernard Arnault, of luxury-goods company LVMH, ranks in the No. 2 spot. As an overseer of countless enduring luxury brands, Arnault has left his mark on the industry. Last year he spent $2 billion to accumulate a 20 percent stake in family-controlled but publicly traded Hermès. </p>
<p>Mayor Michael Bloomberg is No.3 on this year&#8217;s list while News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch comes in at No. 4. The tumultuous News of the World scandals this year have shaken the media baron, but also shown his staying power in the face of just about anything. Brian Roberts and Steve Burke, of Comcast, NBCUniversal, who recently acquired the U.S. media rights to the Olympic Games through 2020, are No. 5.  </p>
<p>Jill Abramson is the highest-ranking woman out of six on the list, at No. 9. She is followed by Angelina Jolie with Brad Pitt at No. 11, Sue Naegle with Richard Plepler and Michael Lombardo at No. 15, Anne Sweeney with George Bodenheimer at No. 22, Bonnie Hammer at No. 24, and Arianna Huffington with Tim Armstrong at No. 25. </p>
<p>Because some power is permanent, Vanity Fair nominates a number of regulars to the Hall of Fame this year. Warren Buffett, of Berkshire Hathaway, joins Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg, Tom Ford, actor Tom Hanks, and designer Karl Lagerfeld. Network impresario Oprah Winfrey, Jeffrey Katzenberg, of DreamWorks Animation, and talk-show host Charlie Rose all make the ranks as well. </p>
<p>The October issue of Vanity Fair will be on newsstands in New York and L.A. on September 1, and nationally and on the iPad September 6.</p>
<p>THE POWERS THAT BE</p>
<p>1.    Steve Jobs, Apple<br />
2.    Bernard Arnault, LVMH<br />
3.    Michael Bloomberg, mayor, New York City<br />
4.    Rupert Murdoch, News Corporation<br />
5.    Brian Roberts and Steve Burke, Comcast, NBCUniversal<br />
6.    François-Henri Pinault, PPR<br />
7.    Bob Iger, Walt Disney Company<br />
8.    Jeffrey Bewkes, Time Warner<br />
9.    Jill Abramson, The New York Times<br />
10.  Steve Ballmer, Microsoft<br />
11.  Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, movies, philanthropy<br />
12.  Diego Della Valle, Tod’s<br />
13.  Roman Abramovich, investments<br />
14.  Mickey Drexler, J. Crew<br />
15.  Richard Plepler, Sue Naegle, and Michael Lombardo, HBO<br />
16.  Larry Gagosian, Gagosian Gallery<br />
17.  Harvey and Bob Weinstein, the Weinstein Company<br />
18.  Marc Jacobs, designer<br />
19.  Lorne Michaels, Saturday Night Live<br />
20.  David Zaslav, Discovery Communications<br />
21.  Jean Pigozzi, investments, art<br />
22.  George Bodenheimer and Anne Sweeney, Disney Media Networks<br />
23.  Vivi Nevo, NV Investments<br />
24.  Bonnie Hammer, NBCU Cable Entertainment and Cable Studios<br />
25.  Tim Armstrong and Arianna Huffington, AOL Huffington Post Media Group </p>
<p>HALL OF FAME</p>
<p>Edgar Bronfman Jr., Warner Music Group<br />
Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway<br />
Ron Conway, angel investor<br />
Philippe Dauman, Viacom<br />
Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg, IAC, DVF<br />
John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins Caufield &#038; Byers<br />
Larry Ellison, Oracle Corporation<br />
Tom Ford, designer/filmmaker<br />
Ted Forstmann, IMG Worldwide<br />
Tom Freston, Firefly3<br />
Brian Grazer and Ron Howard, Imagine Entertainment<br />
Tom Hanks, actor<br />
Jeffrey Katzenberg, DreamWorks Animation<br />
Vinod Khosla, Khosla Ventures<br />
Karl Lagerfeld, Chanel<br />
Ralph Lauren, Polo Ralph Lauren<br />
John Malone, Liberty Media<br />
Ron Meyer, Universal Studios<br />
Leslie Moonves, CBS<br />
Ronald Perelman, MacAndrews and Forbes<br />
Miuccia Prada, Prada<br />
Charlie Rose, talk-show host<br />
Eric Schmidt, Google<br />
Terry Semel, investor<br />
Oprah Winfrey, OWN</p></blockquote>
<p>(Full disclosure: Readers who look closely at the list will notice that all things <strong>ATD</strong> senior editor Peter Kafka is listed as a contributor. This is true! Also true: Peter wrote biographical entries for several people on the list, but has zero input on its composition. He tells us he had no idea that we were being considered for inclusion, and we believe him. He also says that had he been asked for his opinion, he would have voted for us, his bosses, to be included. We also believe that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110831/zuckerberg-tops-vanity-fairs-new-establishment-list-again-and-look-whos-no-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin Is a Hit for Vanity Fair. But She's No Jessica Simpson&#8211;Or Miley Cyrus!</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090706/sarah-palin-is-a-hit-for-vanity-fair-but-shes-no-jessica-simpson-or-miley-cyrus/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090706/sarah-palin-is-a-hit-for-vanity-fair-but-shes-no-jessica-simpson-or-miley-cyrus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.I.G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condé Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graydon Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Hogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsstand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Purdum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VF.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=8987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vanity Fair's prescient decision to put all of Todd Purdum's Sarah Palin profile on the Web last week paid off big on Friday. But it would have done even better had the story featured a slideshow with photographs of attractive young women.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/sarah-palin-vf.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-8990" title="sarah-palin-vf" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/sarah-palin-vf-243x300.jpg" alt="sarah-palin-vf" width="243" height="300" /></a>The punditocracy is still trying to figure out why Sarah Palin is bailing on her day job. But over at Cond&eacute; Nast&#8217;s Vanity Fair, they&#8217;ve got better things to do&#8211;like tallying page views for Todd Purdum&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/08/sarah-palin200908">buzzy feature story</a> on the soon-to-be former governor of Alaska.</p>
<p>The story went up on <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/">VF.com</a> six days ago and has generated just under two million page views since then, says executive online editor Michael Hogan. (Disclosure: I&#8217;ve been a free-lance contributor to Vanity Fair&#8217;s <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/newestablishment">&#8220;New Establishment&#8221;</a> list in the past and will be again this year). Had Palin not made her blockbuster announcement on the Friday before the Fourth of July, the piece would be doing even better: Vanity Fair generated more traffic on the Tuesday the story was posted than the day after Palin made her news.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s a big coup for the magazine&#8217;s site. The only way to generate more attention would be to run a slideshow featuring young attractive women.</p>
<p>Which the site can also do: Its story-and-photo package on <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/06/jessica-simpson-slideshow200906">Jessica Simpson</a>, which ran in May, attracted 5.5 million page views to the site over a two-day period. Vanity Fair has generated 85 million page views so far this year, Hogan says.</p>
<p>And if you <em>really</em> want to generate traffic, run slideshows featuring very young attractive women. Last year the magazine&#8217;s 18-picture slideshow featuring a kind-of-topless <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/06/miley_slideshow200806?slide=2#globalNav">Miley &#8220;Hannah Montana&#8221; Cyrus</a> attracted some <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/4/topless-miley-cyrus-record-traffic-for-vanity-fair">18 million page views</a> in a couple of days.</p>
<p>None of that will be terribly surprising to people who&#8217;ve wallowed in Web publishing for any amount of time. What surprised me a bit, though, was Vanity Fair&#8217;s decision to publish the piece in its entirety from the start. Doesn&#8217;t that cannibalize newsstand sales?</p>
<p>Maybe, says Hogan. But &#8220;it&#8217;s an open question as to what costs newsstand and what doesn&#8217;t.&#8221; And as the magazine tries to figure that out, he says, it has been experimenting. Some stuff goes up online before the magazine hits newsstands, while other pieces won&#8217;t appear on the site until a month later.</p>
<p>In the case of the Palin piece, the magazine had originally prepared to run an excerpt/summary of the story at first, then make the whole thing available by the end of the month after the news cycle was extinguished.</p>
<p>But on Friday, June 26, a few days before the excerpt was scheduled to run online, the magazine rethought its plan, assuming that the piece would be widely quoted and discussed before most people would ever see it. &#8220;The PR department started getting concerned that it was going to be controversial, and they wanted people to read the whole thing, and draw their own conclusions,&#8221; Hogan says. The final call went to Editor-in-Chief Graydon Carter, who, I gather, isn&#8217;t really much of a Web guy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;m still waiting to read <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2009/06/the-man-who-crashed-the-world.html">Michael Lewis&#8217;s latest piece for the magazine, on AIG&#8217;s (AIG) notorious &#8220;financial products&#8221; division</a>. That one&#8217;s only available, for now, in excerpt form online, which means I&#8217;m actually going to have pay cash to read it, or wait a few hours&#8211;Hogan says it should be available in full later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090706/sarah-palin-is-a-hit-for-vanity-fair-but-shes-no-jessica-simpson-or-miley-cyrus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanity Fair&#039;s 2007 New Establishment List: The We-Read-It-for-You Guide</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20070914/vanity-fairs-2007-new-establishment-list-the-we-read-it-for-you-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20070914/vanity-fairs-2007-new-establishment-list-the-we-read-it-for-you-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/20070914/vanity-fairs-2007-new-establishment-list-the-we-read-it-for-you-guide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s time for Vanity Fair&#8217;s annual ranking of 100 powerful business moguls, the 2007 New Establishment list, which always make me feel a little oily after reading it for reasons I cannot quite grasp. Nonetheless, we press on, as it has become filled with earnest billionaire techies in recent years, rather than those scary media [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2007/09/poar01_newestab0710.jpg' alt='vf100' /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for Vanity Fair&#8217;s annual ranking of 100 powerful business moguls, the <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/10/newestablishment200710">2007 New Establishment</a> list, which always make me feel a little oily after reading it for reasons I cannot quite grasp.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, we press on, as it has become filled with earnest billionaire techies in recent years, rather than those scary media barons of yore.</p>
<p>Still, and no surprise, <a href="http://allthingsd.com"><strong>AllThingD.com</strong></a>&#8216;s uber-boss Rupert Murdoch of News Corp. leads the list for his audacious $5 billion grab of Dow Jones.</p>
<p>But No. 2 and No. 3 are Silicon Valley stars Steve Jobs of Apple and those separated-at-birth Google twins (Larry Page and Sergey Brin). Reasons: Duh, iPhone for Jobs and the twins&#8217; sheer do-no-evil evil plot to take over the known world and now, apparently, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070914/google-lunar-x-prize/">space.</a></p>
<p>But after these, it&#8217;s more of a parade of scarier investment types (except for folksy-but-probably-scary Warren Buffett at No. 5), flashy pols (Bill Clinton, Michael Bloomberg) and the usual coterie of Hollywood and media types (Steven Spielberg, of course, as well as Dick Parsons of Time Warner).</p>
<p>In any case, here&#8217;s the number rundown for digital types:</p>
<p>No. 10: Bill and Melinda Gates (for their philanthropy)</p>
<p>No. 15: Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg (him for Net stuff; her for renewed fashion empire)</p>
<p>No. 17: Howard Stringer (Sony struggles, but who doesn&#8217;t like Sir Howard?)</p>
<p>No. 23 Jeff Bezos (he managed to lose the Amazon.bomb moniker)</p>
<p>No. 56: Mike Moritz (new entry on the list for the clever VC)</p>
<p>No. 61: Jeff Skoll (but for media and not for Web stuff)</p>
<p>No. 62: Vinod Khosla (another new VC entry!)</p>
<p>No. 71: Paul Allen (just because!)</p>
<p>No. 83: Jonathan Ive (more iPhone mania)</p>
<p>No. 98: Arianna Huffington (<em>Daaaarling</em>, we&#8217;re thrilled)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20070914/vanity-fairs-2007-new-establishment-list-the-we-read-it-for-you-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

