<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; online advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/online-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>India Launches Antitrust Probe of Google</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120507/india-launches-antitrust-probe-of-google/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120507/india-launches-antitrust-probe-of-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amol Sharma and R. Jai Krishna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amol Sharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition Commission of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. Jai Krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=204340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[India has launched an antitrust probe of Google Inc.'s online advertising business to investigate potential anti-competitive practices, according to government officials familiar with the matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India has launched an antitrust probe of Google Inc.&#8217;s online advertising business to investigate potential anti-competitive practices, according to government officials familiar with the matter.</p>
<p>The probe, which could take several months to complete, is initially focused on AdWords &#8212; Google&#8217;s flagship advertising product and main source of revenue. But the agency conducting the investigation, the Competition Commission of India, could expand it to scrutinize other Google services if it sees fit, the officials said.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304363104577389280326071526.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120507/india-launches-antitrust-probe-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pulling Out Weeds Online</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110606/pulling-out-weeds-online/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110606/pulling-out-weeds-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Steel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=82905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeking to milk the huge growth in online advertising, a rush of technology firms have emerged in recent years pitching an array of techniques for buying, targeting and measuring digital ads. But the raft of newcomers has created a complex landscape that has left marketers confused.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeking to milk the huge growth in online advertising, a rush of technology firms have emerged in recent years pitching an array of techniques for buying, targeting and measuring digital ads. But the raft of newcomers has created a complex landscape that has left marketers confused.</p>
<p>Now a series of specialized companies are pitching products to simplify the landscape by helping marketers navigate the online-advertising world.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304432304576367442653094256.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110606/pulling-out-weeds-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Breach At ReachLocal, But Avoids Pulling A Blippy</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100428/security-breach-at-reachlocal-but-avoids-pulling-a-blippy/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100428/security-breach-at-reachlocal-but-avoids-pulling-a-blippy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Zinsli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blippy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Zinsli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReachLocal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Capital Dispatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=24473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A security breach this month at ReachLocal Inc. is bad timing for the online advertising agency.

The venture-backed company is in IPO registration, so it was required to disclose in an amended S-1 filing Tuesday that a recent breach disrupted its customers’ advertising campaigns and resulted in its Australia platform going offline for 36 hours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A security breach this month at ReachLocal Inc. is bad timing for the online advertising agency.</p>
<p>The venture-backed company is in IPO registration, so it was required to disclose in an amended S-1 filing Tuesday that a recent breach disrupted its customers’ advertising campaigns and resulted in its Australia platform going offline for 36 hours.</p>
<p>However, measured against social networking site Blippy, which accidentally published the credit card numbers of several of its customers on Google (GOOG) earlier this week, the lapse doesn’t look so bad. None of ReachLocal’s customer credit card data or its internal human resources information was compromised, it said.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2010/04/28/security-breach-at-reachlocal-but-avoids-pulling-a-blippy/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&#038;mod=tech">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100428/security-breach-at-reachlocal-but-avoids-pulling-a-blippy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Industry Works on Ads About Ads</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091124/ad-industry-works-on-ads-about-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091124/ad-industry-works-on-ads-about-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Steel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal activities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madison Avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opt out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=18345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madison Avenue has joined forces with Internet companies in a last-ditch attempt to stop privacy regulations over the $29 billion online-ad industry.

The industry is finalizing an ad campaign to educate consumers about how digital advertising works, creating an icon that would appear on Web pages or ads alerting consumers if their activity is being tracked and deploying new technologies to police the Web for illegal activities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Madison Avenue has joined forces with Internet companies in a last-ditch attempt to stop privacy regulations over the $29 billion online-ad industry.</p>
<p>The industry is finalizing an ad campaign to educate consumers about how digital advertising works, creating an icon that would appear on Web pages or ads alerting consumers if their activity is being tracked and deploying new technologies to police the Web for illegal activities. At issue is the practice of tracking consumers’ Web activities&#8211;from the searches they make to the sites they visit and the products they buy&#8211;for the purpose of targeting ads.</p>
<p>The efforts follow calls from the FTC earlier this year for Web advertisers and Internet companies to do a better job explaining how they track and use information about consumers’ Web activities and creating a simple way consumers can opt out of being tracked.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/11/24/ad-industry-works-on-ads-about-ads/?mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091124/ad-industry-works-on-ads-about-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC to Hold Privacy Roundtables</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090916/ftc-to-hold-privacy-roundtables/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090916/ftc-to-hold-privacy-roundtables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew LaVallee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew LaVallee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roundtables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=15513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission is planning three public discussions, starting in December, devoted to technology and consumer privacy.

According to the FTC, the roundtables will address topics such as social networking, cloud computing, online advertising and mobile marketing, the goal being “to determine how best to protect consumer privacy while supporting beneficial uses of the information and technological innovation.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Trade Commission is planning three public discussions, starting in December, devoted to technology and consumer privacy.</p>
<p>According to the FTC, the roundtables will address topics such as social networking, cloud computing, online advertising and mobile marketing, the goal being “to determine how best to protect consumer privacy while supporting beneficial uses of the information and technological innovation.”</p>
<p>Behavioral advertising, in particular, has come under fire by privacy groups. Earlier this month, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Consumers Union and other related organizations called for stronger rules limiting what kinds of personal information are collected by marketers and how long they can hold on them.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/09/16/ftc-to-hold-privacy-roundtables/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090916/ftc-to-hold-privacy-roundtables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Mixed Bag From the New York Times: Q2 Costs Got Better, Ads Got Worse, and Web Dollars Disappeared</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/a-mixed-bag-from-the-new-york-times-q2-costs-got-better-ads-got-worse-and-web-dollars-disappeared/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/a-mixed-bag-from-the-new-york-times-q2-costs-got-better-ads-got-worse-and-web-dollars-disappeared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one-time charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platfroms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=9615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We saw a mini-rally in newspaper shares yesterday, based on the notion that the worst may be over for the industry. But the New York Times's Q2 results are pretty inconclusive: 
The publisher was able to take a big chunk out of costs, but revenue kept plunging, and Web ads dropped by more than 15 percent. The paper did say, though, that things got less bad as the quarter progressed, and that they'll get slightly less bad next quarter, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We saw a <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090722/is-the-newspaper-ad-slump-ending-no-but-its-looking-less-lousy/">mini-rally in newspaper shares yesterday</a>, based on the hopeful notion that the worst may be over for the industry. Now investors are going nuts for the New York Times (NYT), at least in early trading, based on its <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=105317&amp;p=irol-pressArticle&amp;ID=1310654&amp;highlight=">Q2 results.</a> But I think the results are a mixed bag.</p>
<p>The publisher was able to take a big chunk out of operating costs, knocking them down 20 percent. But revenue fell faster. The paper did say, though, that things got less bad as the quarter progressed, and that they&#8217;ll get slightly less bad next quarter, too.</p>
<p>The numbers: After factoring out one-time charges and benefits, the Times posted earnings of eight cents per share, well above the four-cent loss the Street was expecting. But revenue dropped 21 percent, to $585 million; the consensus was $603 million.</p>
<p>The Times posted an operating profit of $23.3 million; without one-time charges that number would have been $66.1 million. That&#8217;s worse than the $100 million the paper made a year ago, but much better than the <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090421/more-pulitzers-less-money-new-york-times-ad-sales-down-27/">$74.5 million it lost (net) in Q1</a>.</p>
<p>But! Ad revenue declined 30.2 percent, an acceleration from last quarter&#8217;s 28 percent drop. In addition to the regular culprits, the Times noted a &#8220;lower volume of online advertising.&#8221; More details on that: Internet revenue dropped a shocking 14.3 percent, and Internet ad revenue was down 15.5 percent; last quarter they were down 5.6 percent and 6.1 percent.</p>
<p>The assessment from Times CEO Janet Robinson:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>Based on what we have seen so far in July, we expect the advertising environment to continue to be challenging. We believe the rate of decline will moderate slightly in the third quarter from what we experienced in the second quarter.</p>
<p>As we look ahead, an enduring constant is the outstanding journalism of The New York Times Company and the esteem in which it is held by our readers. For the balance of the year, we are focused on developing innovative new products and platforms based on our high-quality journalism, particularly in the digital area, and continuing to aggressively lower our cost base to better align it with our revenues. When the economy and ad markets improve, we believe we will be very well positioned to benefit from the restructuring of our business.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/a-mixed-bag-from-the-new-york-times-q2-costs-got-better-ads-got-worse-and-web-dollars-disappeared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Sinks 9 Percent on Disappointing Q2, Weak Q3 View</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090722/omniture-sinks-9-percent-on-disappointing-q2-weak-q3-view/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090722/omniture-sinks-9-percent-on-disappointing-q2-weak-q3-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tiernan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiernan Ray]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=13731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shares of Internet infrastructure software vendor Omniture are taking a beating this evening after the company reported Q2 sales that trailed estimates and a lower-than-expected Q3 forecast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shares of Internet infrastructure software vendor Omniture (OMTR) are taking a beating this evening after the company reported Q2 sales that trailed estimates and a lower-than-expected Q3 forecast.</p>
<p>Revenue rose 22 percent, year over year, to $87.6 million, behind Street estimates of $88.5 million, while profit of 13 cents per share was a penny ahead of estimates. For Q3, the company, which produces software to plan online advertising, said sales would be relatively flat with Q2.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/07/22/omniture-sinks-9-on-disappointing-q2-weak-q3-view/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090722/omniture-sinks-9-percent-on-disappointing-q2-weak-q3-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RealNetworks Q1 EPS Misses; Declines to Forecast</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090507/realnetworks-q1-eps-misses-declines-to-forecast/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090507/realnetworks-q1-eps-misses-declines-to-forecast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tiernan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate infrastructure spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealNetworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiernan Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=11563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet streaming media software developer RealNetworks this evening reported Q1 sales of $140.8 million, down 5 percent year over year, and in line with analysts’ estimates, and a net loss of 10 cents per share, worse than the 6-cent loss expected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet streaming media software developer RealNetworks (RNWK) this evening reported Q1 sales of $140.8 million, down 5 percent year over year, and in line with analysts’ estimates, and a net loss of 10 cents per share, worse than the 6-cent loss expected.</p>
<p>Citing “uncertainty regarding consumer spending,” the company declined to give a forecast for the current quarter. “The company expects 2009 to be a challenging year for consumer spending, online advertising and corporate infrastructure spending,” reads the company’s press release.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/05/07/real-q1-sales-in-line-eps-misses-declines-to-forecast/">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090507/realnetworks-q1-eps-misses-declines-to-forecast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Forecasts: Crummy Offline, OK Online, Sun to Rise in East, Set in West</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090414/ad-forecasts-crummy-offline-ok-online-sun-to-rise-in-east-set-in-west/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090414/ad-forecasts-crummy-offline-ok-online-sun-to-rise-in-east-set-in-west/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gannett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Mahaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PubMatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rubicon Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenith Optimedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=6268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media giant Zenith Optimedia says the ad market is in worse shape than it had previously suspected. This is what Zenith Optimedia, along with just about every other ad forecaster, has been saying every three months or so for the past year. So it's hard to get worked up about this stuff. The upside is also old news: Online advertising is doing better than traditional ads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1444" title="empty-billboard" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/20/files//2008/11/empty-billboard-204x300.jpg" alt="empty-billboard" width="136" height="200" />Media giant Zenith Optimedia says <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123967358227115677.html">the ad market is in worse shape than it had previously suspected</a>.</p>
<p>In the old days, this might have qualified as news. But for the past year or so, Zenith Optimedia, along with just about every other ad forecaster, has been <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/10/hey-do-you-think-this-economy-stuff-will-hurt-the-ad-business-">revising its forecasts downward every couple of months</a> as the reality of the financial meltdown sinks in. So it&#8217;s hard to get worked up about this stuff.</p>
<p>More stuff you pretty much knew already: Online advertising is doing better than traditional ads.</p>
<p>Citigroup (C) analyst Mark Mahaney summarizes his chat with the CEOs of PubMatic and the Rubicon Project, which help online publishers sell inventory through ad networks. Their takeaway is that while pricing for online display ads has dropped dramatically in the past couple quarters&#8211;by as much as 50 percent in some cases&#8211;overall spending should remain flat this year. And as we all know, that&#8217;s the new up.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to see concrete numbers from the ad market, hang tight until Thursday, when we&#8217;ll get earnings reports from two companies at the opposite end of the media spectrum: Gannett (GCI) and Google (GOOG).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090414/ad-forecasts-crummy-offline-ok-online-sun-to-rise-in-east-set-in-west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Got Any Networks Without So Much Spam in Them?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081113/got-any-networks-without-so-much-spam-in-them/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081113/got-any-networks-without-so-much-spam-in-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[52-week low]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kettler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kiddie porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McColo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slowdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year-to-date]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=8412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={2150969001}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081113/got-any-networks-without-so-much-spam-in-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Told You Those Lobbyists Would Come in Handy, Sergey &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080930/told-you-those-lobbyists-would-come-in-handy-sergey/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080930/told-you-those-lobbyists-would-come-in-handy-sergey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Antitrusts Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Eshoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doris Matsui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen Tauscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackie Speier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyn Woolsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Hawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid-search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Hellmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Farr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoe Lofgren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I’ve never seen a tech company ramp up faster than they have in the last year or two,” tech lobbyist Ralph Hellmann said of Google last year. “They’re using all the tools in the lobbying tool kit.” And with some success, it would seem. With the Justice Department reviewing the company's proposed online advertising partnership with Yahoo and its critics growing increasingly vocal, Google has managed to win the support of some California lawmakers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ve never seen a tech company ramp up faster than they have in the last year or two,” <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20070621/google-policy/">tech lobbyist Ralph Hellmann said of Google last year</a>. “They’re using all the tools in the lobbying tool kit.” And with some success, it would seem. With the Department of Justice reviewing the company&#8217;s proposed online advertising partnership with Yahoo and critics growing increasingly vocal, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122272496602187685.html">Google has managed to win the support of some California lawmakers</a>. In a letter to the DOJ, a group of 11 members of the U.S. House of Representatives, all Democrats, urged the Department to approve the Google-Yahoo deal. Dated Sept. 26, the letter was signed by Anna Eshoo, Zoe Lofgren, Ellen Tauscher, Sam Farr, Mike Thompson, Mike Honda, Doris Matsui, Jackie Speier, George Miller, Lynn Woolsey, and Barbara Lee.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are deeply concerned that the Department of Justice may be considering a preemptive lawsuit to block Yahoo&#8217;s nonexclusive online advertising agreement with Google,&#8221; the letter says. &#8220;If such action were taken, we believe such an unprecedented [lawsuit] would detrimentally affect the online advertising market and electronic commerce. &#8230; We believe that robust competition serves the public interest but if the DOJ blocks this agreement we fear that the threat of additional scrutiny may chill future agreements. Similar agreements are commonplace in many industries and standard among Internet companies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, not exactly, as Norman Hawker of the American Antitrust Institute points out. &#8220;Contrary to the letter, similar agreements are not commonplace because industries with this level of concentration are not commonplace,&#8221; <a href="http://www.newsfactor.com/news/Lawmakers-Favor-Google-Yahoo-Deal/story.xhtml?story_id=13200C4QRIAO">Hawker said</a>. &#8220;If you ignore the economic text when you read the words, you can easily be misled into thinking the agreement is harmless. Read in context, however, the words of the agreement explain how Google could easily acquire Yahoo&#8217;s paid-search business.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080930/told-you-those-lobbyists-would-come-in-handy-sergey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Proves Mortal; Opportunity Knocking?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080718/google-proves-mortal-opportunity-knocking/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080718/google-proves-mortal-opportunity-knocking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=2009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, there are a couple of ways to think about Google's (GOOG) big post-second-quarter sell-off this morning. For starters, as I noted last night, there seems to be increasing evidence that online advertising is actually feeling the effects of the slower economy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, there are a couple of ways to think about Google&#8217;s (GOOG) big post-second-quarter sell-off this morning. For starters, <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/07/17/surprise-the-net-is-part-of-the-economy-after-all/">as I noted last night</a>, there seems to be increasing evidence that online advertising is actually feeling the effects of the slower economy. One quarter earlier, the company had denied that it was feeling the effects of the macro slowdown, but that no longer seems to be the case, and the Street is adjusting its perceptions of the company accordingly. On the other hand, the legion of analysts with Buy ratings on the stock almost universally believe investors are being given an opportunity here to buy the stock on the cheap.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/07/18/google-proves-mortal-opportunity-knocking/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080718/google-proves-mortal-opportunity-knocking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise! The Net Is Part of the Economy After All</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080717/surprise-the-net-is-part-of-the-economy-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080717/surprise-the-net-is-part-of-the-economy-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=1999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to disappoint everyone, but the evidence is piling up today: The Internet really is a part of the overall economy. While the optimists had hoped that the efficiency of Internet-based advertising would make it a more appealing place to buy ads in a downturn, it is increasingly obvious that the current economic straits are too widespread for Internet businesses to avoid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to disappoint everyone, but the evidence is piling up today: The Internet really is a part of the overall economy. While the optimists had hoped that the efficiency of Internet-based advertising would make it a more appealing place to buy ads in a downturn, it is increasingly obvious that the current economic straits are too widespread for Internet businesses to avoid. Companies of almost every description are feeling the pain. They are cutting spending. And one of the things they are trimming is spending on is Internet advertising.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/07/17/surprise-the-net-is-part-of-the-economy-after-all/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080717/surprise-the-net-is-part-of-the-economy-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Ad Sales Growth in &quot;Steady Deceleration&quot;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080617/online-ad-sales-growth-in-steady-deceleration/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080617/online-ad-sales-growth-in-steady-deceleration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Crest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Weinstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=1607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, imagine that: the economy really does have an impact on the growth of online advertising.

In a research note this morning, Pacific Crest analyst Steve Weinstein reports that Q2 online advertising is likely to grow in "the high teens" versus a year earlier, down from Q1 growth just under 20% and Q4 growth of 23%, "indicating a modest but steady deceleration."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, imagine that: the economy really does have an impact on the growth of online advertising.</p>
<p>In a research note this morning, Pacific Crest analyst Steve Weinstein reports that Q2 online advertising is likely to grow in &#8220;the high teens&#8221; versus a year earlier, down from Q1 growth just under 20% and Q4 growth of 23%, &#8220;indicating a modest but steady deceleration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Weinstein says the weak economy has lead to a tightening of overall ad budgets. While that is driving some advertisers to spend a larger slice of their budget on the Web, taking share from television in particular, he finds that &#8220;online advertising would be growing faster in a more robust economy and ad market.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/06/17/online-ad-sales-growth-in-steady-deceleration/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080617/online-ad-sales-growth-in-steady-deceleration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
