<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/pew-internet-american-life-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:05:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Fighting for Information</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111109/fighting-for-information/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111109/fighting-for-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Voices</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberbullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=142697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like that’s how most people start fighting because that’s how most of the fights in my school happen &#8212; because of some Facebook stuff, because of something you post, or like because somebody didn’t like your pictures. &#8211; A middle school girl who took part in the Pew study &#8220;Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Like that’s how most people start fighting because that’s how most of the fights in my school happen &#8212; because of some Facebook stuff, because of something you post, or like because somebody didn’t like your pictures.</p></blockquote>
<p class="attribution">&#8211; A <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media/Part-2/Section-1.aspx">middle school girl</a> who took part in the Pew study &#8220;Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites&#8221;<a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media/Part-2/Section-1.aspx" target="_blank"><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111109/fighting-for-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Reader Growth Outpacing Tablets in Recent Months</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110627/e-reader-growth-outpacing-tablets-in-recent-months/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110627/e-reader-growth-outpacing-tablets-in-recent-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ina Fried</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet and American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=91636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some 12 percent of U.S. adults now own a Kindle, Nook or other e-reader, compared with 8 percent who own an iPad or other tablet. Surprisingly, e-reader growth has accelerated over the last six months, while tablet growth has actually slowed somewhat, according to a new survey from the Pew Internet Project.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although most Americans still don&#8217;t have either an iPad or a Kindle, the number of folks owning both e-readers and tablets continues to grow.</p>
<p><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/06/pew-e-reader-tablet-380x274.png" alt="" title="pew e-reader tablet" width="380" height="274" class="alignright size-Medium380 wp-image-91637" /></p>
<p>Interestingly, though, growth in e-readers has actually accelerated in the last six months, while tablet growth has been relatively flat in recent months after enjoying a steep ramp-up following last year&#8217;s launch of the iPad.</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/E-readers-and-tablets/Report.aspx">study</a> conducted by the Pew Internet Project, the number of adults in the U.S. with a Kindle, Nook or other e-reader doubled between last November and this May, to 12 percent from 6 percent. Tablet ownership has grown three percentage points in the same timeframe, from 5 percent in November to 8 percent as of May.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is the first time since the Pew Internet Project began measuring e-reader use in April 2009 that ownership of this device has reached double digits among U.S. adults,&#8221; Pew said in its report.</p>
<p>Around 3 percent of adults have both a tablet and an e-reader, the survey found.</p>
<p>Both devices still fit in the nascent category, though, well behind established devices such as desktops, laptops and digital video recorders, each of which is owned by more than half of adults. Some 84 percent of adults in the U.S. own a cellphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110627/e-reader-growth-outpacing-tablets-in-recent-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pew Study: The Well-Off Use the Net More</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101124/pew-study-the-well-off-use-the-net-more/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101124/pew-study-the-well-off-use-the-net-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Voices</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsbyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=33159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just in from the Department of Unsurprising Research Results: The nation's wealthier households are more likely than those less blessed to own technology gear and use the Internet. According to recent surveys by the Pew Research Center's Internet &#38; American Life Project, those making $75,000 a year and up are more likely to: Have desktops, laptops, music players and game consoles; tap into the Internet frequently and for a greater variety of tasks; and engage in e-commerce. One other note: Even among households with similar access to the Net, the wealthier were more active users.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in from the Department of Unsurprising Research Results: The nation&#8217;s wealthier households are more likely than those less blessed to own technology gear and use the Internet. According to <a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1809/internet-usage-higher-income-americans">recent surveys by the Pew Research Center&#8217;s Internet &#038; American Life Project</a>, those making $75,000 a year and up are more likely to: Have desktops, laptops, music players and game consoles; tap into the Internet frequently and for a greater variety of tasks; and engage in e-commerce. One other note: Even among households with similar access to the Net, the wealthier were more active users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101124/pew-study-the-well-off-use-the-net-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Affordable Broadband?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100812/life-liberty-and-the-pursuit-of-affordable-broadband/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100812/life-liberty-and-the-pursuit-of-affordable-broadband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Callaghan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beth Callaghan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsbyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=28249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should it be the government's responsibility to make affordable broadband Internet access available to everyone in the country? About 53 percent of Americans think not, or think that it shouldn't be a top priority, according to a study released today by the Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project. Only 11 percent think of it as a high priority. Interestingly, those least inclined toward government involvement are the 80 million currently without any Internet access at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should it be the government&#8217;s responsibility to make affordable broadband Internet access available to everyone in the country? About 53 percent of Americans think not, or think that it shouldn&#8217;t be a top priority, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE67A4KC20100812">according to a study released today by the Pew Internet &#038; American Life Project</a>. Only 11 percent think of it as a high priority. Interestingly, those least inclined toward government involvement are the 80 million currently without any Internet access at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100812/life-liberty-and-the-pursuit-of-affordable-broadband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Everyone Using Twitter Yet? Nope.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/is-everyone-using-twitter-yet-nope/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/is-everyone-using-twitter-yet-nope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[average age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's easy to get the impression that everyone uses Twitter. And many people do! But new statistics indicate that four of five Web users are still Twitter-free. Worth keeping in mind as Google and Microsoft start plugging tweets into search results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/weegee-crowd.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6785" title="weegee-crowd" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/weegee-crowd-230x300.jpg" alt="weegee-crowd" width="230" height="300" /></a>The digerati spend a lot of time talking about Twitter&#8217;s growth, Twitter&#8217;s business and Twitter&#8217;s dealmaking. But at this point, many of us tend to take Twitter&#8217;s users for granted: We assume that everyone uses it, or at least everyone we know.</p>
<p>But we&#8217;re not exactly right. New statistics from the <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/17-Twitter-and-Status-Updating-Fall-2009.aspx">Pew Internet Project </a>indicate that 19 percent of U.S. Internet users are on the service on a regular basis. To spell out the obvious: One in five is a lot of people, but it&#8217;s not everyone.</p>
<p>This is worth remembering as <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091021/twitter-in-microsoft-google-3-way/">Google</a> (GOOG) and <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091021/microsofts-qi-lu-talks-about-bing-and-confirms-facebook-and-twitter-real-time-data-deal-at-web-2-0/">Microsoft</a> (MSFT) move to integrate Twitter updates into search results: Those results come from a particular slice of Web users.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Pew&#8217;s breakdown of that slice, by gender, race and other demographic markers:</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/twitter-demo.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12318" title="twitter demo" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/twitter-demo.png" alt="twitter demo" width="350" height="454" /></a></p>
<p>Pew says the average age of a Twitter user is 31 (MySpace, 26; Facebook, 33; LinkedIn, 39). And it has some other stats that are useful&#8211;and, if you use the service, evident.</p>
<p>For instance, Twitter and mobile are a peanut butter/chocolate combination&#8211;25 percent of Internet users with wireless access use the service, compared with eight percent of those who are tethered. And, not surprisingly, gadget junkies are Twitter junkies too: 39 percent of Web users with four or more Internet devices use the service, compared to 10 percent with one device.</p>
<p>The full report is embedded below:</p>
<p><object id="_ds_13544311" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="550" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="_ds_13544311" /><param name="FlashVars" value="doc_id=13544311&amp;mem_id=288399&amp;doc_type=pdf&amp;fullscreen=0" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://viewer.docstoc.com/" /><param name="flashvars" value="doc_id=13544311&amp;mem_id=288399&amp;doc_type=pdf&amp;fullscreen=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="_ds_13544311" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="550" src="http://viewer.docstoc.com/" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="doc_id=13544311&amp;mem_id=288399&amp;doc_type=pdf&amp;fullscreen=0" name="_ds_13544311"></embed></object><br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;"><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13544311/PIP-Twitter-Fall-2009">PIP-Twitter-Fall-2009</a> &#8211; </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/is-everyone-using-twitter-yet-nope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Newspapers, in Chart Form</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090522/the-end-of-newspapers-in-chart-form/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090522/the-end-of-newspapers-in-chart-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Newmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=7666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm still not exactly sure why Google has become the chief suspect in the "Who Killed Newspapers" investigation playing out before our very eyes. Because it's quite clear to me that the real baddie here is bespectacled, mild-mannered Craig Newmark, whose eponymous free service blew up the industry's most profitable line of business: classified advertising. Here's the argument in line-graph form.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/20/files//2008/10/crater.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-44" title="crater" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/20/files//2008/10/crater-150x150.jpg" alt="crater" width="150" height="150" /></a>I&#8217;m still not exactly sure why Google (GOOG) has become the chief suspect in the &#8220;Who Killed Newspapers&#8221; investigation playing out before our very eyes. Because it&#8217;s quite clear to me that the real baddie here is bespectacled, mild-mannered <a href="http://www.cnewmark.com/">Craig Newmark</a>, whose eponymous free service blew up the industry&#8217;s most profitable line of business: classified advertising.</p>
<p>Yes, there other players in the online classifieds business, and they cut into the monopoly that newspapers relied upon for decades, too. And some of them, like Monster (MNST) and Yahoo (YHOO), have even tried to ally themselves with newspapers. But all of them charged money for their services. And you can&#8217;t compete with free. Just ask the music industry.</p>
<p>Craigslist launched in San Francisco in 1996, but didn&#8217;t really start picking up steam until the end of the first Web bubble, which is exactly when the newspaper industry&#8217;s classified revenue peaked. See for yourself, via this chart from the <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/7--Online-Classifieds/1-Overview/1-The-number-of-online-adults-to-use-classified-ads-websites-has-more-than-doubled-since-2005.aspx?r=1">Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project</a> (click to enlarge):</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/classified-chart.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7667" title="classified-chart" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/classified-chart.png" alt="classified-chart" width="300" height="325" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090522/the-end-of-newspapers-in-chart-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 168-Hour Work Week</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/the-168-hour-work-week/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/the-168-hour-work-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-to-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Ben-Baruch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of the Internet III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Internet & American Life Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberto Gaetano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sociologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working hours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=9637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the line between your work and home life hasn’t yet been blurred by near-ubiquitous Internet connectivity, just you wait. Because by 2020 it’s likely to have been erased entirely. That’s the word from the Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project, whose recent “Future of the Internet III” study suggests that the dawn of the mobile phone as a “primary” Internet connection will essentially obliterate the boundaries between work and home.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/12/168hourworkweek.jpg" alt="" title="168hourworkweek" width="200" height="227" class="alignright size-full wp-image-9644" />If the line between your work and home life hasn&#8217;t yet been blurred  by near-ubiquitous Internet connectivity, just you wait. Because by 2020 it&#8217;s likely to have been erased entirely. That&#8217;s the word from the Pew Internet &#038; American Life Project, whose recent <a href="http://pewinternet.org/PPF/r/270/report_display.asp">&#8220;Future of the Internet III&#8221; study</a> suggests that the dawn of the mobile phone as a  &#8220;primary&#8221; Internet connection will essentially obliterate the boundaries between work and home. Fifty-six percent of  the Pew survey&#8217;s respondents agreed that by 2020 the formalized delineation of social, personal, and work time will have disappeared. “The 9-to-5 approach will disappear completely, with few exceptions,” <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_FutureInternet3.pdf">ICANN Board member Roberto Gaetano told Pew</a>. “The current separation between ‘work time’ and ‘free  time’ is a byproduct of the industrial revolution, and is bound to disappear with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>So 12 years from now our work lives will be our lives entire?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an unsettling thought. But if we&#8217;re always connected, always on the grid, then what&#8217;s to stop it from coming to pass? What&#8217;s to stop “the expansion of the work to encompass all time and all space,&#8221; as Nick Carr described it in his comments to Pew researchers. A reassertion of the same boundaries we&#8217;re seeing erased, I imagine. Otherwise we may have this to look forward to&#8230;</p>
<p>Said Benjamin Ben-Baruch, senior market intelligence consultant and applied sociologist for Aquent: &#8220;In 2020…a myth will develop that outside of formally scheduled activities, work and play can be seamlessly integrated in most of these workers’ lives. Employers will attempt to convince us that this is a net positive for people because we will be able to blend personal/professional duties&#8230;. However the reality will be quite different. Because we can be surveilled whenever we are ‘connected’ and especially because we can be surveilled whenever we are connected using our employer-provided devices, we can and will be controlled. Our employers will gain even more control over work-time discipline and over our lives and will be able to force even more productive working hours from us. Our lives will in fact be increasingly controlled by those who provide us with the devices that will have become increasingly necessary for us in both our work and personal lives as well as those who own and control the networks and network sites that we use and visit. Some companies will try to distinguish themselves as companies that do not actually use their power to watch and control us&#8211;but most companies will do the ‘fiscally responsible’ thing of using available technology to assert control.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081215/the-168-hour-work-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

