<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; resource action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/resource-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>IBM Layoffs: 1,148 and Counting</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120228/ibm-sacking-hundreds-of-employees/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120228/ibm-sacking-hundreds-of-employees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alliance@IBM/CWA Local 1701]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=178994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reason for leaving last job? "Resource action." Also: Offshoring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/09/Giant_axe.png"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/09/Giant_axe-380x285.png" alt="" title="Giant_axe" width="380" height="285" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-124868" /></a>They&#8217;re swinging the axe over at IBM again. The company is sacking hundreds of employees this week, in what it likes to euphemistically refer to as “resource actions.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.endicottalliance.org/">Alliance@IBM/CWA Local 1701</a>, an IBM employee advocacy group, reports that <a href="http://wraltechwire.com/business/tech_wire/wire/story/10784152/">upward of <strike>800</strike> 1,000 workers</a> have been let go this week, with more to follow.</p>
<p>Most of the job cuts appear to be within the U.S., with a high concentration in IBM&#8217;s Global Technology Services outsourcing unit.</p>
<p>Alliance@IBM national director Lee Conrad puts the current tally of layoffs at 1,148, and says it&#8217;s offshoring that&#8217;s driving the reductions. &#8220;Those jobs are moving offshore, which seems to be the trend at IBM,&#8221; Conrad told <strong>AllThingsD</strong>. &#8220;This is a further abandonment of the U.S. workforce. When IBM talks about rebalancing, what they really mean is moving jobs from the States to overseas.&#8221;</p>
<p>IBM did not respond to a request for comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120228/ibm-sacking-hundreds-of-employees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Mulling Sun &quot;Resource Action&quot;?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Staten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=15980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neither Sun nor IBM will confirm that the two companies are even in talks, but the two will reportedly announce their merger on Monday--not today as previously thought. And after the deal, then what? Massive layoffs, most likely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/sun_ibmjpg.jpeg" alt="sun_ibmjpg" title="sun_ibmjpg" width="200" height="114" class="alignright size-full wp-image-15981" />Neither Sun nor IBM will confirm that the two companies are even in talks, but the two will reportedly announce their merger on Monday&#8211;<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090402/ibm-sun-deal-friday/">not today</a>, as previously thought. That&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=akNk_HK.8cUI">the word from Bloomberg</a>, which confirms claims that IBM (IBM) intends to pay between $9 and $10 a share for Sun (JAVA). The Wall Street Journal, meanwhile, pegs the price at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123869375752683145.html">$9.55 per share, or about $7 billion</a>. At that price, the acquisition will be the largest in IBM’s history, surpassing even its $5 billion purchase of Cognos in 2007.</p>
<p>And after the deal, then what? Massive layoffs, most likely. Analysts say redundancies between the two companies&#8217; businesses could cause IBM to sack as much as a third of Sun&#8217;s employees in one of those <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090326/black-thursday-at-big-blue-2/">&#8220;resource actions&#8221;</a> it&#8217;s so fond of. &#8220;This deal is definitely going to lead to a lot of combined layoffs,&#8221; <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/03/sun-ibm-merger-technology-enterprise-sun.html">Forrester Research analyst James Staten told Forbes</a>. &#8220;And it wouldn’t be a surprise if most of that bloodletting happened on the Sun side.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Mulling Sun "Resource Action"?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Staten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=15980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neither Sun nor IBM will confirm that the two companies are even in talks, but the two will reportedly announce their merger on Monday--not today as previously thought. And after the deal, then what? Massive layoffs, most likely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/sun_ibmjpg.jpeg" alt="sun_ibmjpg" title="sun_ibmjpg" width="200" height="114" class="alignright size-full wp-image-15981" />Neither Sun nor IBM will confirm that the two companies are even in talks, but the two will reportedly announce their merger on Monday&#8211;<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090402/ibm-sun-deal-friday/">not today</a>, as previously thought. That&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=akNk_HK.8cUI">the word from Bloomberg</a>, which confirms claims that IBM (IBM) intends to pay between $9 and $10 a share for Sun (JAVA). The Wall Street Journal, meanwhile, pegs the price at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123869375752683145.html">$9.55 per share, or about $7 billion</a>. At that price, the acquisition will be the largest in IBM’s history, surpassing even its $5 billion purchase of Cognos in 2007.</p>
<p>And after the deal, then what? Massive layoffs, most likely. Analysts say redundancies between the two companies&#8217; businesses could cause IBM to sack as much as a third of Sun&#8217;s employees in one of those <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090326/black-thursday-at-big-blue-2/">&#8220;resource actions&#8221;</a> it&#8217;s so fond of. &#8220;This deal is definitely going to lead to a lot of combined layoffs,&#8221; <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/03/sun-ibm-merger-technology-enterprise-sun.html">Forrester Research analyst James Staten told Forbes</a>. &#8220;And it wouldn’t be a surprise if most of that bloodletting happened on the Sun side.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

