Samsung Electronics co-CEO Shin Jong-kyun said at an industry forum in Seoul this week that S4 shipments will top 10 million in a few days. This, less than a month after the device’s debut in some 60 countries.

“We are confident that we will pass more than 10 million sales of the S4 next week,” Shin said, according to the Korea Times. “It is selling much faster than the previous model S3.”

Great news for Samsung, but news that comes with an important caveat: The company here isn’t talking about retail sales to consumers, but sales to carriers. Reached for comment, Samsung confirmed to AllThingsD that Shin was indeed referring to shipments into the channel when he offered that 10 million unit number.

Ten million handsets shipped into the channel in such a short time is still a hell of a milestone. But there’s a big difference between that and consumer sales of 10 million. The S4 may well be selling much faster than its predecessor, but not so much faster that there will be 10 million units in consumer hands next week. Some will still be sitting on carrier shelves awaiting purchase.

It’s worth noting that Samsung is not alone in reporting smartphone “sales” this way. Many companies do — including Apple. When the company posts quarterly earnings, it reports iPhone “sell in” numbers — numbers that include products it has shipped to retail partners like AT&T, Best Buy and Walmart, but not necessarily sold to end consumers. From Apple’s latest earnings statement:

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable. Product is considered delivered to the customer once it has been shipped and title and risk of loss have been transferred. For most of the Company’s product sales, these criteria are met at the time the product is shipped. For online sales to individuals, for some sales to education customers in the U.S., and for certain other sales, the Company defers revenue until the customer receives the product because the Company retains a portion of the risk of loss on these sales during transit.

Now, Apple has some 400 retail stores worldwide, and they — along with the company’s Web sites — sell a lot of iPhones directly into the hands of consumers. But they didn’t do that for every one of the 37.4 million the company sold in its recent quarter. Indeed, during Apple’s last earnings call the company said it had 11.6 million iPhones in channel inventory during the period.

Those were devices “shipped” to retail partners. But for Apple’s purposes, they were “sold.” Same story for Samsung.

Demand Media, the online content company, said it had earned nine cents on an adjusted basis in the first quarter, on revenues of $100.6 million, topping Wall Street estimates of eight cents on $99.6 million in sales. On a fully diluted basis, earnings were one cent a share, or $700,000, compared to a loss of two cents, or $1.8 million, in the three months compared to a year ago.

“Strong growth from our owned & operated content and media properties drove our Q1 results, highlighting the unique capabilities of our content discovery, creation and distribution platform. Further, we accelerated our paid content strategy with the acquisition of Creativebug, a premier online destination for arts and crafts instruction, which will provide our large eHow crafts audience with an expanded learning experience. In addition, we signed up over 400 resellers to our new gTLD tools and received more than two million expressions of interest for domains to be registered with new gTLDs,” said Richard Rosenblatt, chairman and CEO of Demand Media in a statement. “We are excited about the distinct long-term growth opportunities for both of our businesses.”

Demand’s eHow site seems to have driven a lot of the gains in the content area.

Demand shares rose in trading yesterday by close to two percent, to close at $8.58, also its stock is down 7.6 percent for the year.

The company did not mention the planned split of its registar and content business that it announced in the last quarter in the current results, which might be covered on the conference call the Santa Monica, Calif. company will have with analysts at 2 pm PT.

In its last earnings release for the fourth quarter, Demand said it was spinning off its domain registrar business from its media one in a bid to better clarify the company to investors.

Since it went public several years ago, there has been some level of difficulty for each part of Demand to easily explain itself to Wall Street, given the very different natures of its key — but very different — revenue units. In a statement at the time, Demand said that it was “our intent to spin off our registrar business and separate into two independent, publicly traded companies.”

The company noted that the two units “divergent strategic priorities and opportunities” would be better in the new configuration with a pure-play media company and domain services company. At the time, the company said the transaction was expected to take place in the next nine to 12 months, although it required a number of company and regulatory approvals to do the tax-free spin-off to create two different stocks.

In a different kind of transaction, Demand had talked a little more than a year ago to a private equity company about taking the company private. The effort was abandoned, in which Boston-based Thomas H. Lee Partners would have purchased Demand for a price of up to $1.2 billion, due to a number of challenges. Its current market valuation is now about $744 million.

Until we hear more about the spin-off plans from Demand execs, here’s the full release from Q1 to peruse:

1Q 13 FINAL RELEASE

Joyus, the video shopping platform startup led by former top Google exec Sukhinder Singh Cassidy, said it had raised $11.5 million in a second round of funding, led by InterWest Partners and Time Warner Investments. Existing investors Accel Partners and Harrison Metal also participated.

In related news, Joyus said that Ido Leffler, co-founder of natural beauty brand Yes To, would join its board.

The San Francisco-based Joyus has now raised total capital of $19 million to push its efforts to combine video with retailing online. Along with the funding news, the company underscored the efficacy of its approach in a study it also released that it says shows “fashion, beauty and lifestyle brands can directly monetize video through direct response product sales.”

Using premium video content to flack its wares, Joyus said that it converts at 5.15 times the rate of visitors who only browse product listings on the site and that its viewers buy 4.9 times more than those who don’t watch the product videos.

“Every time someone watches a video, Joyus can measure the resulting sales revenue, creating the first ever metrics for return on investment (ROI) using online video to drive product sales,” said Joyus, which noted that on a half-dozen product areas that the average revenue per video (RPV) view ranges from 47 cents to 93 cents, meaning every thousand views of video on Joyus produces between $470 and $930 in direct sales revenue. Joyus shares a cut of the sales on its site with its merchants and provides the purchasing tools.

While others might dispute this performance and many online retailers have added video to their sales processes, Joyus CEO and founder Cassidy said in an interview that online retail has to shift from a focus on engagement statistics and monetization via brand advertising to direct product sales results.

“The data on video shopping needs to be aimed at a return on the investment rather than on just brand recognition,” she said. “We think by providing an informative and entertaining experience, where you can make purchases right away, consumers buy and that this is the direction online commerce is moving.”

As I noted in a previous post about Joyus when it launched in mid-2011: “If you think about a link-laden infomercial, you’ll get a general idea of what is being created by Joyus.”

While Cassidy did note that a comparison could be made to television shopping networks like HSN, which shows elaborate demos of its products, Joyus has its own tech stack and video platform that allows shoppers to watch in a non-linear way that is preferable online and also on mobile.

“We are aimed at those customers who are bred and born on digital, so the merchandising formula is different,” said Cassidy. “This is a shopper from 30 to 50 who wants entertainment and commerce together in a format that is convenient.”

Yahoo turned in a first-quarter report that showed continued flat revenue, although earnings were up.

Here’s the liveblog of the conference call following the report, which starred Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who tried to explain how she planned to remake the Silicon Valley Internet giant to increase that weak revenue in its key display advertising and search units:

2:00 pm: I like that Mayer started on time, which many a Yahoo CEO did not in the past.

Still, there is no way she could easily explain away the revenue miss at the company in the quarter, which is due in large part to its ever-declining display advertising sales.

Thus, she used the metaphor of running to clarify the situation.

“Getting the company going at the rate we would like will take several years,” she said, describing turning Yahoo around as a “series of sprints,” including making it a great place to work.

The next sprint will be to create “beautiful products.” After that, the next one will be to improve user engagement. And then, presumably, “ultimately growth.”

2:08 pm: Mayer touted better employee collaboration, which she said has made Yahoo a more attractive place to work than ever before.

She also noted that Yahoo has gotten a lot of ex-Yahoos — which she called “boomerangs” — to return to the fold.

Mayer deftly did not mention the better earnings — largely due to cost and tax savings, as well as other financial manipulations and not sales efforts — since managing the business well is not the same as growing it.

But, let it be said: She and CFO Ken Goldman seem to be managing Yahoo very well, although Wall Street and others are expecting them to goose revenues.

2:13 pm: It is on to Goldman, who goes through the numbers, which Yahoo has already released.

Here’s a quick synopsis: Yahoo’s display advertising business is down 11 percent in the first quarter to $455 million, with the number of ads sold declining seven percent and the price per ad falling two percent.

As it did last quarter, search revenue did not save the day. It also declined 10 percent to $425 million, although it was up six percent when traffic acquisition costs were not counted in. While paid clicks were up 16 percent, price per click was down seven percent.

Employee count was down 19 percent, another expense savings.

Goldman is clearly a smart cookie, but there is a long road here from this to true revenue growth.

2:26 pm: Mayer underscored that immediately, noting that Yahoo has to meet the growth rates of competitors, such as Google and Facebook, behind which Yahoo badly lags.

“Make no mistake,” she said about that need, noting that improvements in its core properties, as well as mobile products, are key focuses for her to improve sales.

She said there was a respectable mobile growth in users in the quarter, although she declined to say just how much revenue Yahoo makes in mobile. (It’s not much yet, so that explains that.)

Partnering is also important to her, she said, working with companies all over the Internet space.

All will lead to better user engagement, and “with user engagement comes monetization,” she added.

We are on course, she concluded — presumably on what will likely be an exhausting sprint.

2:30 pm: Then, it was onto questions from analysts.

The first was about why there were declines in ad sales — via a plan to de-load pages of them or just not selling enough and declining page views.

It is a complex issue, due to various elements, from the move to mobile to waiting for product improvements to kick in with users.

There was then a question about partnering — which Yahoo has indeed been good at. That said, I sometimes wonder if the company were a bit less cooperative and more selfish, as its rivals always are, that it might be more successful.

Mayer still said she thinks partnering is a good thing.

The next question was whether Microsoft will continue to pay its revenue per search guarantees to Yahoo, as it has in the past when their search deal did not meet expectations.

From a “conservative point of view, there will be no renewal,” said Goldman, although he notes that Yahoo talks to Microsoft daily.

I’d like to hear that conversation!

2:38 pm: An obvious question then came about when the heck Yahoo will get its display business moving.

“It’s a sprint and it’s a chain reaction,” said Mayer, not precisely answering the question and using comparative metaphorical terms that were perhaps more awkward to hear today given the tragedy in Boston.

The next question was about adding more of a Google advertising relationship, a deal which would certainly up Yahoo’s revenue, although there have always been potential regulatory issues related to it.

Mayer pointed to a recent smaller ad partnership with the search giant, and “we occasionally explore new opportunities.”

What ho? (Hey, Nikesh, that’ll be me calling, so pick up!)

2:42 pm: Another question came about whether Yahoo could improve its search share, which has been declining.

Mayer, who is an expert in this area, said that search interface improvements will matter, although there are other ways of adding share too, such as closer relationships with browsers.

She was animated here, which was probably a good idea, given her COO Henrique De Castro seems to be swinging and missing in the display advertising arena.

Thus, the follow-up question was perfect, about the sales realignment that De Castro initiated that has caused a lot of internal distress at Yahoo.

Mayer said she thought that “this is the right thing to do,” although it’s not as clear if she really knows how jarring the change has been for the sales troops. Display ad sales are not her area of expertise, so she probably needs to get more up to speed on this critical issue.

2:48 pm: The usually tepid analysts kept pounding away on that issue, which Mayer answered by saying the decline is less of a decline than is had been previously. It’s faint praise, of course, but it’s a fair point.

Also of interest is whether Yahoo could create a mobile layer on top of Google’s Android as Facebook just did with its innovative Home software.

If you have been around as long as I have, you know that Yahoo once had an immersive app called Yahoo Go that came too soon and was ultimately executed badly, despite being a great concept.

Mayer did compliment Facebook on the good idea of Home, though, which was classy, since it is.

2:51 pm: There was then a question about Yahoo’s golden ticket of an asset — its large share of China’s Alibaba, which is kicking it in all aspects, especially related to revenue.

Would that Yahoo could inject some of that energy into its own core business.

Then came another important question: Does Yahoo have the assets to keep up in ad sales and technology?

“This will be an area of continued focus for us,” said Mayer.

The questions continued about mobile and pricing issues in search.

Mayer noted that although the company has no “direct monetization” from its weather and stock quote defaults on the Apple iPhone, it does provide leads to other parts of Yahoo’s offerings and is valuable for that.

As to increasing cost per clicks, she said that the gap has still not been closed with Microsoft on improving search monetization.

Which has to happen, obviously.

2:59 pm: Mayer was asked about the “next sprint,” which she said will be the fun part.

There will be version updates and more of a “cadence” that is presumably not glacial. She has certainly got to run faster, given how quickly Facebook, Google and many others are moving in comparison.

It would be fun if Yahoo could keep up the pace.

The last question was about Mayer’s strategy in search, including how to grow Web and mobile search.

Again, the search expert has a lot of good ideas.

Then, cleverly, Mayer summarized her Q1 earnings report in 140 words, via the engine it acquired from its recent $30 million purchase of Summly, versus her prepared script of 2,000 words.

I’m pleased with the continued execution I see every day — our teams have been working very hard, especially in Q1. As a result of these initiatives and many others, the talent is undeniable — today, more applicants want to work at Yahoo, and more employees are staying. These teams bring an incredible mix of engineering and technical talent, which will help us accelerate our efforts in mobile development and content personalization.

The teams are already moving quickly to amplify the entrepreneurial spirit that’s so prevalent at Yahoo right now. Designed to be more intuitive and personal, the new Yahoo experience is all about users’ interests and preferences. Yahoo is a consumer Internet company, and the consumer Internet is a growth industry. We’re on course to do what we said we would do — stabilize, and grow with the market.

But to summarize in even fewer words, using only my limited, non-$30 million, Twitter-schooled mental faculties: Yahoo is trying to race as fast as it can to keep up, but the results are still not in.

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg might still be trying to figure out the social networking giant’s mobile monetization strategy, but there’s one thing she has locked: The top spot on two of the most important bestseller lists at the same time.

This week, for the first time, her “Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead” ranked No. 1 on the influential New York Times list for hardcover nonfiction, as well as for combined print and e-book nonfiction. The list, which appears in this coming Sunday’s issue of the New York Times Book Review, actually reflects sales for the week ending March 16, 2013.

“Lean In” has been on Amazon’s top 100 list of all books for much longer — in fact, for 32 days. The tome on the many difficulties faced by women in the workforce reached No. 1 status several weeks ago.

The official release date of the book was March 11, which was followed by a publicity blitz of massive proportions, including the cover of Time magazine, huge takeouts in innumerable newspapers, and laudatory television pieces on “60 Minutes” and with Oprah Winfrey.

“Lean In” has also attracted a huge dollop of controversy, with everyone and their mother (and my mother, Lucky, too) arguing over its merits, as well as its message — including whether Sandberg blamed women too much for the lack of advancement in the executive ranks.

She doesn’t, actually — if you read it, which many pundits appear to not have done. But that has not stopped the rigorous and welcome debate over the important issue, which seems to be exactly what Sandberg was aiming for.

Sales appear to have been widespread, but seem to also be helped by big purchases by companies such as Cisco, which are encouraging employees to read it.

According to numerous sources, Vivek Sharma, who is GM of the powerful Yahoo Mail and Yahoo Messenger products, has left the company.

It’s not clear where Sharma — who has been at the Silicon Valley Internet giant since 2009 and has worked in a number of areas, including commerce and search — is going or what the reasons are for his departure from Yahoo.

Some sources said he clashed with CEO Marissa Mayer, who has been involved in the recent overhaul of one of Yahoo’s key consumer products, due in part to recent issues related to email vulnerability and other issues. But others said he simply wanted to move on and has a new job lined up already.

There are several other top Yahoo execs who are likely to go in the coming weeks, especially given many bonuses are awarded this month. Mayer has also been looking over her top management and wider workforce and culling it, sometimes in ways that attract national controversy and even a lawsuit.

Keeping talent and finding new blood has been an issue for the fledgling CEO. As I have previously reported, as well as others in more detail this week, she is approving all new hires herself and has put in place more stringent hiring standards at Yahoo.

Sources said she has been trying to convince a top product exec at Google to essentially replace Shashi Seth — with whom she parted ways in January — who would oversee Mail, Answers, Messenger, the homepage and possibly the media group.

In addition, her COO Henrique De Castro has a search out for a new head of the key Americas unit to man its important sales division and more in the U.S. market.

In other words, a lot of empty desks that need filling.

I have an email in for comment into Yahoo, but you know how that goes (FYI: It doesn’t).

Who is this mysterious “established partner,” and why is BlackBerry concealing its identity? The company refuses to say. “We are bound by confidentiality and cannot disclose our partner’s name,” BlackBerry spokesman Adam Emery told AllThingsD.

So, for the time being, the purchaser’s identity will remain unknown. But 1 million BlackBerrys is a hell of a big smartphone order. Military? Government? Some foreign entity? Or simply a carrier? I’m sure we’ll hear soon enough.

Last week, the fight between Apple and pugnacious hedge fund investor David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital went all flat when he withdrew a lawsuit after the company yanked a proxy proposal that would have allowed shareholders to vote on eliminating preferred stock from the company charter.

But the real issue at the core of the fight — the massive mountain of $137 billion in a cash hoard that Apple holds and that Einhorn wants it to distribute in some fashion to shareholders — still remains.

It’s not clear what Apple will do now, especially since a lot of it is overseas. But execs have indicated that they are evaluating what to do to best serve nervous investors, who have bidded the stock down 40 percent since the fall. While it’s not clear what that will be, it’s also pretty likely Apple will do something.

Until the company decides, though, I have some good ideas for CEO Tim Cook to consider:

* Apple could purchase 1,567,506 Tesla Model S Performance vehicles with 85 kWh battery and a carbon fiber spoiler at $87,400 each, which would effectively allow CEO Elon Musk to buy the New York Times (a bargain at $1.42 billion!) and use it as his own personal blog.

* It could buy 17.9 houses for each Yahoo employee located near its Sunnyvale, Calif., HQ, so they could be super-close to work, per CEO Marissa Mayer’s wishes. That breaks down to 206,015 overall homes for 11,500 workers, at a median sales price of $665,000 for the area.

* Apple could acquire a big chunk of the Internet all at once, including Groupon ($3.36 billion), Yahoo ($25.95 billion), Facebook ($61.7 billion), Twitter ($10 billion), LinkedIn ($18.32 billion), Yelp ($1.47 billion), AOL ($2.81 billion), Pandora ($2.09 billion), Zynga ($2.69 billion), OpenTable ($1.32 billion) and, finally, Pinterest ($2.5 billion). Phew.

* It could pay Andrew Mason’s $378.36 severance after getting jacked as CEO of Groupon 364,013,179 times over.

* Apple could pay for 97,857 parties for Yammer’s David Sacks’s 40th birthday (at $1.4 million each). Snoop Dogg included.

* It could foot the bill for the budget cuts to save the U.S. government $85 billion this year, so Americans could stop having to say “sequester.”

* Apple could buy $329 16 gigabyte Wi-Fi iPad minis for 416,413,374 people — everyone in the U.S. (315,429,318), plus France and Spain.

* Or it could just give the 7,069,909,686 people on the planet $19.38 each, and call it a day.

* Apple could use $1 bills to carpet an area of 560 square miles, which would more than cover Silicon Valley.

* Finally — and I think this would be a nice gesture to make up for calling his efforts a “silly sideshow” — Apple could give Einhorn 15.56 times the value of his $8.8 billion fund.

Or, of course, not.

In its first full quarter under new Chief Executive Hubert Joly, the Richfield, Minn., retail chain delivered improved free cash flow while gross profit margins fell less than expected despite stepped up efforts to match rivals’ prices.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

HP shares are rising after hours on word that the company rather handily beat its own expectations and those of the Street. The consensus view called for it to report 71 cents a share in per-share earnings. HP came in at 82 cents. Sales were also ahead of the consensus, despite the fact that revenue fell in nearly every significant business segment.

Still, don’t harsh HP’s buzz with too many details. There’s more to crow about: Net debt of the operating company came down by $1 billion to $4.7 billion, and it’s looking like HP will be close to zero debt for the operating company this year.

The results if nothing else buy Meg Whitman and her team some time to quiet the critics who say HP should be split into two or more companies in order to unlock value. That buzz was prominent late in the trading session as rumors flew that a breakup announcement might accompany earnings. As careful AllThingsD readers might have already guessed, a breakup isn’t in the cards, at least not for the time being.

The conference call with analysts is about to get under way momentarily and I’m listening in. Expect lots of questions about the balance sheet, and probably more chatter about the breakup idea.

One bit of housekeeping: Since I’m in New York, the time stamps are set to Eastern Standard Time.

Earlier:
5:05 pm: Joining the call in progress. CEO Meg Whitman is speaking. She says the restructuring program put in place last year is having the desired effect.

Whitman: We improved operating company net debt position for the fourth consecutive quarter.

Whitman: Revenue from converged storage products was up 18 percent.

Whitman: In servers, business stabilized. We expect to grow market share by 1 percentage point this year.

Whitman: Networking showed continued growth, up 6 percent. I was also pleased with performance improvements in printing. New business models and new printers helped boost operating margins.

One thing that changed in developing markets is that the price of hardware has increased while the price of ink has dropped. That’s the Ink Advantage program she’s talking about.

Whitman: PCs gained 1.4 percentage points of share world wide, and 4 points in the U.S.

Whitman: Total enterprise services exceeded expectations. There is still a long way to go, but I believe that ES (the former EDS) will deliver on the recovery plan put in place last year.

Whitman: We are making significant investments to improve our channel partner programs.

Whitman: If we can mobilize HPs 300,000+ employees there is nothing we can’t do.

Whitman: Turnarounds happen when old and new customers believe. In HP’s case customers are really starting to believe. We saw a number of big wins including one with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Another is eyewear company Luxottica (sorry if I misspelled that), which hired HP to run its data centers.

Whitman: We clearly still face a long road ahead. I don’t like that we saw revenue declines in all our business lines. Restoring growth is a priority and we’re on it.

Whitman: It will be toward the end of the year before the recovery plan starts showing up on the top line.

5:14 pm: Whitman: There are a lot of reasons we are in the PC market. She’s addressing again why there won’t be a spinoff of the PC business.

Whitman: Pricing continues to be very competitive.

In Enterprise Group, we are seeing a tepid market in Europe for servers.

Whitman: We will now be breaking out converged storage from traditional storage to better show the growth there.

5:17 pm: Now Whitman is talking about the hiring of Larry Stack to reignite sales in the Enterprise Services group. (Wonder where you read about that first? You got it: AllThingsD.)

Whitman: Now talking about HP Labs under its new head Martin Fink.

Whitman: Talking about Project Moonshot. We expect this to truly revolutionize the economics of the data center.

Whitman: If just 10 large web services switched to Moonshot servers, they could save $120 million a year, and 100 million (?) metric tons of CO2 released into the atmosphere, because it consumes so much less power than prior models.

Whitman: I’m pleased about Q1 and feel good about the rest of the year.

Now CFO Cathie Lesjak is speaking.

Lesjak: At the highest level, I would characterize this quarter as one more data point in our consistent, but not linear, recovery plan.

Lesjak: Now she’s talking about some new reporting information disclosures.

Lesjak: (Going through the numbers again.) From a global economic perspective, we are still seeing headwinds, but some healthier pockets.

5:23 pm: R&D spending declined, though it was because of some tax credits and some contract accelerations in Q4.

Lesjak: Europe was a challenge, but we continue to see good signs in Asia-Pacific and Japan.

Lesjak: Decline in printer revenue is partially due to a shift toward higher-end printers and away from lower-priced ones.

Lesjak: Again, solid growth in server sales in Asia, especially in China.

Lesjak: Talking more about the storage business. Q1 was the fourth consecutive quarter where margins expanded. Now Business Critical Servers. Phase two of the trial with Oracle is expected in Q2, which will address Oracle’s breach of contract and damages.

(Though Oracle lost the first phase of the trial, it has promised to appeal the decision.)

Lesjak: In services, we have moved away from unprofitable contracts.

Lesjak: We saw strong growth in security and big data software offerings.

Now talking about cash and capital allocation. $253 million went back to shareholders through share repurchases, and $258 million via the dividend. Net debt is now $4.7 billion at the operating company level.

Lesjak: As we’ve said, 2013 is a fix-and-rebuild year. There are market and macro pressure and some of the ES changes are being delayed.

And now we’re heading into Q&A.

Question from Bill Shope of Goldman Sachs; he’s asking about the breakup idea.

Whitman: We have no plans to break up the company. (Heard that??) HP is better and stronger together.

Whitman: We have a terrific set of assets. When you think about our brand, our scale, our distribution, and importantly the customers want this company to be together. We feel strongly it’s better together.

Katy Huberty of Morgan Stanley: Earnings on the back half of the year look like they may come down. What else makes you cautious about the back half of the year?

Lesjak: It’s really about Enterprise Services not having the runoff in Q1 that we expected.

There’s also some challenges about the timing of signings.

Lesjak: There’s some cautious optimism there.

5:44 pm: Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein: Where are you in your cost savings?

Lesjak: The non-labor savings are coming in later this year.

Question from Ben Reitzes of Barclays: I understand why you want to keep guidance in place, but why not raise the free cash flow target above $5 billion?

Lesjak: Glad you pointed out the operating cash flow. We’re happy with it, up 115 percent. We’ve really gotten a lot of discipline. We don’t typically update our cash flow mid year. Best way to think about it is that it was a very big deposit on the year.

Question from Shannon Cross: How will you judge the success of the OfficeJet ProX printer platform? How do you think about this versus your laser platform?

Whitman: This is an exciting opportunity because it prints at the speed and quality of a laster. We’re going to drive it as hard as we can. We’re going to measure the units installed. With regard to laser we have a great laser lineup, but if there is cannibalization; that’s the way business goes. If there’s going to be cannibalization, better we do it to ourselves than someone do it to us.

Missed a question there. Sorry about that.

5:53 pm: Question about Enterprise systems sales.

Whitman reminds us that BCS sales got whacked again. But there’s a good product lineup coming. Waiting for another mention of Moonshot.

Whitman: We have to make the right investments because it’s a big piece of HP’s profitability. (Lesjak just mentioned in the answer to the previous question that PSG accounts for only 10 percent of HP’s operating profitability.)

Another question, this one from Mark Moskowitz of J.P. Morgan. Clearly your net debt position is improving nicely. How are you thinking about investment internally from R&D and acquisitions?

Whitman: For 2013, we’re still focused on rebuilding the balance sheet and offsetting dilution. We’re going to stay focused on fixing what we have. You never say never, maybe there’s a tuck-in acquisition we have to have, but there’s nothing in the plan. Also, one thing we have to stop doing at HP is increase R&D and then pulling it back, and then repeating that. We’re going to stay on the plan that we have.

Question from Brian Marshall at ISI about the software business, where he’s seeing some deceleration of growth.

Whitman: The bright spots in software are Vertica and security. Apps and ops are not where we want them to be. We need to make some changes that will kick in by 2014. We have some basic blocking and tackling there.

Steve Milunovich asking about PC supplies and inventory.

Lesjak: Channel inventory on PCs, overall it’s good. On the consumer side, despite the fact we gained share in consumer we ended a bit higher than we would like. The real star is the channel inventory in printing. We have been dogged by ink supplies inventory being too high for several quarters. Now its down 27 percent since the peak. We’ve had dollar declines over the last six quarters.

Whitman: One of the things we’ve asked the business groups to do is limit discounting to get products out the door. It’s healthier for us and better for the channel. It also allows us to differentiate our ink and toner product and get away from the commoditization we were expecting about 18 months ago.

Final question from Credit Suisse: About free cash flow. Given the improvement, it looks like you will pay down most of your debt. If you are generating $6 billion to $7 billion in free cash flow each year, how dedicated are you to increasing dividends and buybacks?

Lesjak: At the end of the year we’ll be thinking about how we allocate capital around the time of the next analyst meeting. We are committed to returning cash to shareholders. Our view around dividends is that over the long term, our payout ratio should improve as well. We are aligned and working with the board to determine the mix.

6:05 pm: Closing remarks from Whitman: The turnaround is on track and we did better than we expected we would. We have to deliver and continue to execute as an organization.

And we’re done. See you next quarter!

Yahoo reported its fourth-quarter earnings today, with earnings higher than expected, but with a continued flattish revenue.

The Silicon Valley Internet giant aid its non-GAAP net profits were 32 cents a share, compared to 25 cents in the same period a year ago. But GAAP net earnings per diluted share were 23 cents in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared to 24 cents last year.

Shares jumped just above four percent in after-hours trading to above $21 a share, given Wall Street analysts were estimating a profit of 27 cents per share in Q4.

Net revenue, without traffic acquisition costs, was expected to be $1.21 billion. It was $1.22 billion and which is essentially flat from a year ago’s $1.17 billion. Search revenue was up nicely, while display sales declined.

Overall the results showed a non-sinking but none-too-powerful ship and not very impressive given almost every other Internet company grew revenue significantly in comparison. For example, Google reported last week that core revenue was up 21 percent in the quarter.

Still, up is up, even if it is not up that much. “I’m proud of Yahoo!’s 2012 and fourth quarter results. In 2012, Yahoo! exhibited revenue growth for the first time in 4 years, with revenue up 2 percent year-over-year,” said Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer in a statement.

In other words, she’ll take two percent, given the nearly persistent revenue declines of recent years. It is progress, of course, even if investors are looking for more robust increases ahead.

Also of note: Yahoo said it repurchased 79.6 million shares at an average price of $18.24 for $1.45 billion in the fourth quarter, which most definitely was one of the reasons for its recent stock run-up.

Yahoo did not release information on consumer engagement and traffic in the Q4 report, which it had done until Mayer took over. As AllThingsD.com had previously reported, most metrics in the quarter were down significantly over last year.

The fourth quarter was the first that was entirely under the new regime of Mayer, who arrive at Yahoo in July from Google.

She’s gotten a big break from Wall Street, which has sent Yahoo’s stock up in recent months on the hopes of her turnaround plans.

Last week, Mayer said the long-suffering Silicon Valley giant would be returning “back to its roots,” as part of an effort to finally turn it around. It’s actually part of a bigger plan which AllThingsD.com had reported on previously, to focus Yahoo on being a center of content discovery on the Web, across multiple devices, with wide-ranging and “very friendly” partnerships with other companies.

More to come at the 2 pm PT, conference call with Mayer, which I will be liveblogging as usual.

Until then, here’s the official press release and deck from Yahoo:

YHOO_News_2013_1_28_General

Q4’12_Earnings_Presentation.vsFINAL

Longtime digital exec Jeff Berman is joining Hollywood production company BermanBraun as its first president.

Berman — who is no relation to BermanBraun co-founder Gail Berman — comes to the firm from the National Football League where he has been in charge of its Web, mobile, social and non-console gaming efforts. While there, he worked on several new initiatives, such as its multi-party video chat for Fantasy Football.

Several years before that, he was a top exec at social networking site Myspace, finally ending up as president of sales and marketing, where he was in charge of branded advertising, sales operations, entertainment, content and marketing. Efforts there by Berman included the now defunct Web-only series “Quarterlife,” which also had a very short life on a major network.

The Yale Law School grad was also on the board of Buddy Media, which was sold to Salesforce.com last year.

He’s an interesting person, then, for BermanBraun, which focuses on content across multiple screens, including big branded Web sites such as Wonderwall for Microsoft’s MSN and also more traditional entertainment shows. Its juicy-looking television series “Deception,” for example, is set to appear on NBC this week. It now has about 130 employees, mostly working at its Santa Monica, Calif., HQ.

“We needed an exceptional leader to manage the company,” said BermanBraun co-founder Lloyd Braun, who was once a top media exec at Yahoo. “And Jeff is someone who has skillsets in a whole bunch of areas and an emotional intelligence that is as important to what we do.”

Braun said Berman would initially focus on his area of expertise — digital — but that he would become more involved in the television and movie arenas over time.

BermanBraun — which considered raising funding last year — is at an interesting juncture in its development, trying to form a new kind of independent Hollywood media company that straddles analog and digital.

Berman said he was attracted to the opportunity there.

“I had a great job, since there is nothing bigger than the NFL,” he said in an interview yesterday. “But Lloyd and Gail have an incredible vision across platforms for entertainment.”

He added that content was just at the beginning of development online, but was finally poised to explode with the popularity of tablets, smartphones, interactive TV and other such devices, as well as social and e-commerce tools.

“The mind reels, there is so much that has happened and can happen,” said Berman. “I don’t know if there is a better time to be at such a place to create these new franchises — [BermanBraun] is a laboratory, where stuff is actually working.”

The culture-celebrating hijinks continue at Yahoo, it seems.

After free food and smartphones and even dressing up as a Yahoo purple banger, CEO Marissa Mayer now has a high-ranking exec dancing for employee enjoyment.

As part of an effort to improve participation in the annual Yahoo Employee Satisfaction Survey (YESS), Mayer instituted a punishment for the lowest participation rate of any division on her executive staff.

The culprit turned out to be Jackie Reses, EVP of people and development for Yahoo, which includes the unlikely combo of human resources and business development.

Thus, Reses apparently had to dance to the hit K-pop song “Gangnam Style” with her staff at the weekly FYI employee meeting at Yahoo’s Sunnyvale, Calif., HQ on Friday.

Despite having a rep as an intense New Yorker, said one employee, Reses has some “decent moves.” Others agreed.

Also decent was one of the top results of YESS, which showed that employee belief in the future vision of the company was up 32 points year over year.

That’s not a big surprise, given the upward trajectory of Yahoo’s shares of late. But, more to the point, it has a weak comparable in last year’s survey, which painted a picture of a deeply demoralized workplace. That’s because the 2011 YESS questions went out to employees the week that the company fired CEO Carol Bartz, with most of the responses gathered in the ensuing weeks.

Despite the improvement, this year’s YESS also still showed a lot of worry about whether Yahoo leadership can execute, and whether the company can achieve strong results over the long term.

[UPDATE: One reader said the Yahoo survey is now called YEES, the Yahoo Employee Engagement Survey. I could not determine if that name change had been made.]

That’s the question that at least one Wall Street firm was asking, in a downgrade of Yahoo stock today. In dropping Yahoo’s rank to “market-perform,” Sanford C. Bernstein analysts noted worries about its turnaround efficacy, a possibly jarring reorg of its advertising unit, and also whether the future sale of its assets in China’s Alibaba Group can save the day again, as it did for last quarter’s results.

“We think there may be upside from an eventual Alibaba IPO at a valuation much higher than $50B or a Yahoo! core turn-around, but it is hard to have high conviction in either given the facts we currently have,” said the report, in part. “In addition, there is manageable but real downside risk: reorganization (e.g., of the sales force) could be negative for revenues, management could decide to invest in growth now and cut excess later, and MSFT RPS guarantee could expire without a renewal.”

Those are all good questions for investors to ask, of course, although more have been caught up in the hype/hope ahead of actual performance gains.

Still, it’s no sweat to get caught up in digital execs being made to trip the light fantastic for their weak results. So, since I was not there to enjoy Reses’ performance, click here for an also fun-tastic JibJab Gangnam video I made of her.

As I had previously reported, Yahoo’s key business unit — its advertising sales force — is now getting details of a reorganization by its new leader, COO Henrique De Castro.

In making the changes, just weeks ahead of Yahoo’s annual sales conference in Las Vegas on Jan. 21, De Castro is borrowing rather heavily from the set-up of the powerful ad business at Google, from whence he came.

By shifting the sales organization to a “category” model, sales reps at the Silicon Valley Internet giant will sell all of Yahoo’s ad products, as well as its search offerings, across channels in a vertical process organized around advertiser segments, such as automotive, entertainment and packaged goods.

Yahoo has long sold its advertising in a regional and tiered organization against premium and performance inventory in display and search, designed to avoid vertical conflict. Thus, the sales staff have built up advertiser relationships across many areas, which will not work in the new system.

Sources inside the company said regional leaders will now be shifted to running various verticals. There will be support specialists for those areas, too.

Mark Ellis, who was most recently VP of North American sales and global partnerships, will pay a key role in the new org, said sources. It is not clear, though, what role Peter Foster, who has headed audience advertising, will play. Another high-ranking exec, Keith Kaplan, has apparently been shifted to focus on agency relationships.

As I had previously written, there are many different ways to organize sales, but making such major change has potentially large ramifications on Yahoo’s financial performance, at least in the short term, since advertising makes up the bulk of its revenue.

According to numerous sources inside Yahoo, the changes are causing some measure of worry and confusion across the salesforce at the company, since it comes after a lot of wrenching changes over the last year.

That includes the departure of well-regarded Chief Revenue Officer Michael Barrett in mid-October, after De Castro got the COO job. He has left a large gap in sales leadership and in maintaining strong relationships with big advertisers and agencies. De Castro himself is not as well known in the ad marketplace, despite many years at Google in its sales organization.

He will likely have a more high-profile next week at the International CES, the huge annual consumer electronics show taking place in Las Vegas, along with new Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, who was a top product exec at Google. The pair is planning on meeting with major ad clients while there, which is their first significant outreach to marketers since taking their new roles at Yahoo.

De Castro had outlined the new ad reorg plan immediately after a multiday offsite with top sales leaders several weeks ago, and said the changes would come at the very beginning of 2013.

The ad staff at Yahoo begin to hear of the changes on Friday, so it looks like De Castro has met his deadline.

Nicolas Raymond / Freestock

According to comScore’s final tally for the November-December shopping season, spending for the two-month period totaled $42.3 billion, a 14 percent increase over 2011.

“This year’s growth rate is essentially on a par with last year’s,” said comScore Chairman Gian Fulgoni. “But despite many positives for the online sector, this year’s season did not quite perform up to our initial expectation for growth rates in excess of 16 percent as we fell a billion dollars short of our expected total of $43.4 billion.”

The research firm, which tracks online shopping habits over broadband connections in the U.S., said a slowdown occurred after Thanksgiving due to low consumer confidence.

“As it turns out, this December swoon coincided closely with a significant decline in the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index that was attributed in large part to consumers’ fiscal cliff concerns. You might say that had it not been for Congress, every other indicator suggested it would have been an even merrier Christmas for online retailers,” Fulgoni said.

This season’s high points included some particularly outstanding days for online retailers, including Cyber Monday, Nov. 26 ($1.5 billion); Monday, Dec. 17 (up 76 percent to $1.013 billion); and Christmas Day (up 36 percent to $288 million). But those good days could not make up for three solid weeks in which the growth rates failed to surpass 12 percent.

Here’s a week-by-week breakdown of spending this season. A noticeable lull is present during the middle weeks:

This softness may have been expected based on preliminary results that some retailers released this morning. The figures indicate that sales may have been soft for many in December, not just online retailers.

For instance, Target said sales in December were flat; and Wet Seal, Macy’s and Kohl’s either cut their fourth-quarter outlooks or said quarterly results will be at or near the low end of their previous guidance range, according to MarketWatch.

Online sales are still growing at a much faster clip than retail as a whole. For instance, overall, December same-store sales, excluding drug stores, rose 4.8 percent, according to data from Retail Metrics.

While comScore’s report may be disappointing to some, it won’t affect all online retailers evenly.

For one thing, comScore’s results don’t include purchases made over mobile phones. Mobile commerce, which includes orders placed on tablets and phones through mobile browsers or applications, were a highlight for many retailers this holiday season. Second, there will be some retailers that overperformed and others that lost share.

As an example, Baird Equity Research’s Colin Sebastian raised eBay’s price target earlier today to $60, up by $2, based on evidence that eBay and PayPal excelled during the holiday season. The company’s full results will be out on Jan. 16.

And the one to watch closely will be Amazon.

Many brick-and-mortar companies resolved to fight the giant e-tailer by guaranteeing to match online prices. Whether that had any impact is still not known. Additionally, there was some question earlier this holiday season if Amazon was performing as well as expected.

Wells Fargo Analyst Matt Nemer said that for the first time in years, Amazon was giving some customers coupons for 10 percent off their orders. But it was unclear whether Amazon was only trying to reactivate old customers or if it was doing it because sales were short. Another plausible reason was that customers were procrastinating. Amazon allowed some customers to order as late as Dec. 21 with the promise of delivery by Dec. 24, which may have delayed some purchases.

After it set a single-day ticket sales record on Christmas Day, Fandango said that 2012 was the best performing year in its 12-year history for ticket sales, as well as for traffic and app download results.

A press release by the Comcast-owned online movie ticketing and information site said sales were up 57 percent in the year, while monthly visitors rose 34 percent to about 41 million in peak months, and there were 31 million app downloads.

Fandango, which is the online movie ticketing service for Yahoo Movies, AOL Moviefone and MSN Movies, also said that mobile sales rose 171 percent in the year, making up 30 percent of overall ticket sales.

For 2013, the company said it would increase both its reserved-seating options and paperless mobile ticketing, as well as launching two more original video series.

So far in the six-month reign of Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer, there has been a pile of attention paid to the flashy cultural changes (free food!), much-needed rehauls of key mainstays (Flickr, Yahoo! Mail, homepage), a focus on attracting entrepreneurial talent (Hey, we got Max Levchin to join the board!) and, of course, the frequent mention of mobilemobilemobile by the former Google product exec.

But on the topic of where the Silicon Valley Internet giant’s search and display advertising business is headed — which is, of course, its key revenue and profit generator — it’s pretty much been crickets.

No longer, it seems, according to multiple sources inside and outside Yahoo. Mayer is planning a series of appearances at the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show — which is taking place in Las Vegas in less than two weeks.

That includes sitting for a high-profile fireside chat with Starcom MediaVest Group Global CEO Laura Desmond in front of several hundred ad clients on Wednesday, January 9; organizing a plethora of one-on-one meetings; and throwing a Yahoo dinner party, as well as angling for invites to key parties thrown by others, such as MediaLink’s power player dinner on Tuesday, January 8.

As I previously reported, the company is planning on having this much more prominent presence there in order to reset its sometime rocky relationship with advertisers.

And, not surprisingly, its big weapon at the giant annual confab will apparently be Mayer, who has not yet interfaced significantly with the company’s big ad clients since taking the top job in July. At CES, sources said, Yahoo is hoping the “Marissa Halo” — i.e. the excitement around the decidedly telegenic exec — will help boost its business.

It’s important, since big agencies and advertisers have privately been grumbling about the lack of outreach by Yahoo and also how much more active execs at rivals such as Facebook, Google and AOL have been.

More than one source close to Yahoo said the dissatisfaction was being heard loud and clear at the company. “[Everyone will] take it as an opportunity to vent (again), while Yahoo promises a new beginning,” said one exec.

New beginnings will again be the case, though, with new COO Henrique De Castro also in place. He’s been making a series of moves to rejigger the ad business at Yahoo since he got there earlier in the fall, also from Google, including shifting its sales process to a category model.

In addition, Yahoo execs have continued their noodling on whether or not to make significant ad tech purchases — with no major deals in place yet — along with improving the creaky performance of the company’s own owned-and-operated offerings.

It’s all in the hope that advertisers and agencies will reconnect with Yahoo after the nearly consistent CEO changes over the last year. For those keeping score, after Carol Bartz was fired in the fall of 2011, CEO Scott Thompson made his debut at CES in early 2012, touting Yahoo’s data prowess before being ousted only months later. He was followed by renewed efforts toward marketers by interim CEO Ross Levinsohn.

And now there’s Mayer.

Interestingly, while many major ad players are looking for more specifics about how Yahoo will improve its mobile, search and data products to give better insights to advertisers, they also are simply wanting to hear Mayer’s plans for Yahoo.

“What I don’t see yet is what the vision for Yahoo is, articulating the bigger ideas than just presenting an assemblage of products,” said Rob Norman, chief digital officer of GroupM Global. “And what everyone would still like to see is what is the escape route from being a portal or even reemerging from what that means, so I am really interested in what she has to say.”

Added another top ad exec: “She really has not said anything yet about how she plans to capitalize on Yahoo’s strengths over the next year in the ad space. People are genuinely excited about Mayer, but the stakes are still high for her since everyone feels as if they have already given Yahoo a lot of extra chances.”

High stakes, indeed. But, then again, it is Vegas.

Preparing for an eventual IPO isn’t easy, taking years of planning, of careful strategy decisions, of picking your people perfectly. Even then, things can still go wrong. Just ask Facebook.

While an initial public offering is still far down the road for Twitter, perhaps sometime in 2014 at best, it seems the company wants its house in order now.

The culmination of this came on Wednesday evening as Twitter shuffled two of its highest-ranking execs, shifting Ali Rowghani from his position of CFO to COO, while moving recent hire and former Zynga treasurer Mike Gupta into the CFO seat.

Joi Ito/Flickr Newly dubbed Twitter COO Ali Rowghani

In typically understated Rowghani fashion, the move went down rather unceremoniously. Rowghani and Gupta updated their Twitter profiles with their new titles at some point on Wednesday. After word got out, CEO Dick Costolo congratulated the two men over Twitter.

Rowghani has long been a quiet, behind-the-scenes force in the organization, preferring to take a backseat to the limelight so often reserved for Costolo and co-founder and now Twitter board Chairman Jack Dorsey. Despite holding the CFO title for the better part of three years, Rowghani has worked in a major operational role inside the company, acting as Costolo’s most trusted adviser. Wednesday’s appointment just made it official.

But Twitter’s C-suite troika isn’t the only part of the organization that needed tweaking. Over the past year and a half, the company has quietly cherry-picked talent from around the Valley and re-organized its ranks — or “grew up,” if you will — better suiting itself to become a tech company to take seriously.

From the top down, Twitter looks much different than it did just a few years ago. Product, the core of Twitter, was split into three separate areas: Consumer, growth/international and revenue. Michael Sippey and Othman Laraki focused on consumer and growth/international, respectively, while splitting revenue responsibilities (after the departure in June of former product VP Satya Patel).

Engineering is almost entirely transformed. I’ve been told Twitter poached literally hundreds of Googlers to join the ranks of the engineering department, an area which was sorely deficient in 2010 considering the scale and growth of the product’s reach. Now Adam Messinger and Chris Fry have joined as engineering heads from Oracle and Salesforce, respectively. I’m told that both are recruiting heavily from their old organizations, too, bringing on much new engineering blood at a fast pace.

Design VP Mike Davidson

The design department is also in flux. New arrival Mike Davidson has been snatched away from his Seattle design gig to lead Twitter’s efforts as VP of Design, working with existing director Doug Bowman. Both are currently pushing hard to recruit new design talent, looking to fill nearly 10 slots in the department (while that sounds small, it’s nearly a quarter of the team’s current numbers).

Sales is no different. President of global revenue Adam Bain snatched up Richard Alfonsi from Google in June to be VP of global online sales, and tapped Xooglers Shilesh Rao and Stephen McIntyre, too.

The overall goal is this: At six years of age and now 200 million active users, Twitter is maturing beyond the scrappy start-up it was in its early days. On the one hand, that environment contributed to some of its most enjoyable early qualities for many employees. But I’m told by multiple people close to the company that part of the organization’s maturation means moving away from hiring the “generalist” types that populated early Twitter, moving instead to highly specialized industry veterans who have strong experience with very particular sets of skills.

In theory, that means reliability — of internal departments, of site infrastructure, of revenue, of a business model — of the type that makes a company stick around for the long haul. And ideally, it moves out from under the shadow of Twitter as the Valley company known so famously for its tales of internal strife (Costolo has often referred to the company’s bad rep as “palace intrigue,” not to be taken seriously).

If it’s an idyllic setting I’m painting here, part of Twitter’s process of closing ranks, it’s also not without its problems.

The company has swelled with new hires in a relatively short amount of time, ballooning up from a couple hundred employees to around 1,500 in under a year.

New talent is good, but explosive growth in such a short amount of time takes its toll on the company’s structure and DNA. Each new top recruit from Google has brought with him or her a host of new Googlers. So much the case, this is, that I’m told it’s not uncommon to hear new recruits explain “how we did things at Google” during team meetings or while working on collaborative projects.

DragonBe/Flickr

And with such an influx of new blood, I’m told many of the old guard are finding it difficult to recognize the Twitter they joined. Internal disagreements with Twitter’s new stance on its platform rules have been cause for some grumbling. The design team has seen a near exodus over the past two months (for many reasons, but not the least of which is Twitter’s changing internal vibe). The Google management style, incorporated — however unconsciously — by many of Twitter’s top talent, doesn’t always translate well when brought over to Twitter.

To put it another way that I’ve heard so often from current and former employees: Twitter is slowly growing more corporate in feel, day by day.

Is that a bad thing? Perhaps, if you’re a Valley type looking to live the start-up life. But if you’re a business on a trajectory with an IPO in a few years or less, perhaps Twitter is right where it needs to be.

Michael Katz, one of Yahoo’s high-ranking online advertising execs, is leaving the company, according to a memo he sent out to staff on Friday.

Considered a savvy online ad player and a well-regarded entrepreneur, Katz came to the Silicon Valley Internet giant a year ago when it bought Interclick, the ad-targeting company he co-founded and headed, for $270 million.

Yahoo later used Interclick’s technology in its audience-buying platform called Genome. In a reorganization announced in January, Katz was placed in charge of sales operations and data and performance optimization for Genome.

The data unit is at the center of efforts by Yahoo’s new CEO Marissa Mayer to turbocharge its ad business.

But the Katz missive, which is below in its entirety, clearly signaled that his departure was not an amicable one, which sources underscored was part of a larger rejiggering of the ad sales staff under new COO Henrique De Castro.

“As some of you are starting to learn, my last day with the company will be today,” wrote Katz on Friday. “Leaving Y! is not the hard part — how it happened and leaving all of you is what makes this difficult.”

How it happened, said several sources, was that Katz was suddenly told by HR head Jackie Reses last week that there was not a place for him, only days before a large 12-month retention bonus was to be paid out to him for the Interclick acquisition.

While it is an unusual thing to part on willfully difficult terms with an entrepreneur, as it sends a bad signal to others considering joining the company, Yahoo’s new leadership has been playing hardball with a lot of top execs it is parting ways with, and is also limiting departure packages.

Former marketing head Mollie Spillman, for example, was suddenly let go after she was replaced by former Lockerz CEO Kathy Savitt. And, though he had wanted to leave, former CFO Tim Morse was also told of his replacement in a swift exec house-cleaning move, as was former HR head David Windley.

Of course, such moves are not unusual when a new set of leaders enters the corporate picture. That’s why many at Yahoo expect even more changes to come soon in the ad unit, with most assuming that Mayer and De Castro will bring in new staff they had previously worked with at Google.

Currently, top Yahoo ad execs include Peter Foster, GM of audience advertising at Yahoo; and Mark Ellis, VP of North American sales and global partnerships.

It will be interesting to see what happens to them and others as part of a large ad reorg at Yahoo now taking place, which will definitely include a variety of departures and arrivals. One recent notable Yahoo ad exec departure, for example, was Debbie Menin, who headed entertainment and travel sales strategy, and is now a top sales exec at hot video entertainment network Machinima.

More will come in the new year, given that De Castro has recently briefed employees on a plan to move its sales organization to a “category” model. Simply put, that means its sales reps will sell all of Yahoo’s ad products, as well as its search offerings, in a vertical process organized around advertiser segments.

That massive shift is not Katz’s to worry about anymore, it seems. Here’s his entire email to staff, which is a pretty eloquent one, as goodbye letters go:

Friends and Colleagues,

6 years ago if someone would have told me that the hardest part about building a business would be to one day say goodbye, I would not have believed them. As some of you are starting to learn, my last day with the company will be today. Leaving Y! is not the hard part — how it happened and leaving all of you is what makes this difficult. I will miss the daily interactions and will take with me the many memories. This has honestly been so much fun.

I have learned a lot along the way:

Sometimes winning looks like losing. If you don’t fail, you can’t progress and the stakes only get bigger as you go further down your path.

Be genuinely happy for those that are successful at reaching their goals. If you spend anytime wishing it were you, it will never be.

Stay humble, and never declare victory.

Approximately correct is better than definitely wrong. Do not let perfection be the enemy of excellence.

We are all human — we may make mistakes, we must forgive, forget, and move on together.

Treating people right is not an option.

Treat adults like adults and they will behave like adults. Rules are for children.

People and culture are everything. It’s about so much more than free food and parties, it cannot be forced and without it a business cannot succeed.

I consider myself so very lucky to have known a handful of loyal friends that took a chance, quit their jobs and risked a lot to build this business with me. Their loyalty and hard work helped interclick get off the ground and for that I will forever be grateful. The team they helped to build has truly made this the greatest place to work. Each and every one of you made interclick the very best company to work for.

I would like to leave you all with a reminder of what together we built:

– A company that started with $27,000 and sold for $270,000,000

– A company that redefined the way that marketers think about audience targeting and data

– A company that went public in 2009 on NASDAQ defying all odds

– A company that spit in the face of adversity early in 2011 and came out victorious

– A company whose people are the future of this organization.

So be proud of what together we achieved, look back and know you were part of something big. Then look ahead and know that this is just the beginning, we will all one day build again. For those of you that continue your career at Y!, I ask that you don’t lose sight of greatness. Remember what you are capable of and continue to make me proud.

Thank you for your loyalty, passion, dedication, and collaboration. The finish line is only the beginning of a new race.

-MK

Wall Street is certainly enthusiastic for such an outcome — even grabbing onto a specious rumor that perhaps Google was sniffing around the troubled Chicago-based social discount deals company, which is currently valued at just over $3 billion. On Friday, Groupon’s stock jumped 23 percent on takeover speculation after Tom Forte of Telsey Advisory Group was quoted as saying: “Where the stock is currently trading, it’s a takeout candidate.”

Actually, the stock has been trading at these levels for a very long time, so the sudden attention is decidedly overwrought. More to the point, sources close to Google — which had offered $6 billion for the company before it went public — said that Google has not been contemplating a second foray into acquiring Groupon.

The same is true for eBay, said sources, and Amazon is an unlikely buyer because it already owns a stake in LivingSocial, the second-largest daily deals provider. Additionally, there are lots of other problems that any purchaser would face in buying the company, which sells everything from bikini waxes to GPS devices at a discount.

In an onstage appearance this morning, CEO Andrew Mason declined to address the thinly sourced rumors of a takeover. “What I have said about Groupon is everything I will say about it,” he said. “I am focused on looking forward.”

Given the non-answer, it’s still prudent to ask, is there actually a buyer for Groupon?

First, let’s address the price. Two years ago, Google offered to purchase Groupon for $6 billion. A year later, it went public at $10 billion, and today, it is trading for $2.9 billion. The company has $1.2 billion in cash, and owes merchants about half of that, or around $573 million.

That said, it is still a relatively low price for a company that includes a customer base of 40 million people who bought something in the past year, a hodgepodge of local retailers and merchants that consider Groupon their online marketing channel, and — perhaps most importantly — a better-than-expected mobile business that now represents a third of its transactions.

But, while it costs much less than it once did, that doesn’t necessarily make Groupon a steal.

That’s because over the past year, the Chicago company has stumbled operationally. Europe is underperforming, the company’s main coupon business is slowing as the novelty of the business is wearing off and it has started investing heavily in selling products, a low-margin business that requires tons of logistics to package and ship items to people’s front doors. On top of that, the board recently discussed replacing Mason, who some directors fear may not be the right choice to continue leading the company. While they ultimately decided to keep him, it was a perceptual blow.

At least one big investor is betting something will happen: Tiger Global Management, which recently bought up close to 10 percent of Groupon. The well-regarded hedge fund and private equity firm may be betting it can’t get worse, and perhaps would even push for a sale.

In any case, here’s a look at some of the scenarios:

Google

When Google made the offer two years ago, the search engine was interested in entering the daily deals business as a way to gain a foothold into all things local, including commerce. Since Groupon rejected that $6 billion acquisition, Google has spent the past two years building Google Offers.

While Google Offers still has a very small piece of the market, it has been pivoting toward an integrated ads model, which is less complementary to Groupon’s approach. Google believes that merchants will pay Google only after a purchase has been made, and the sum will be determined by the consumer. The cost per acquisition model is very different from Groupon, which has the consumer paying up front for a heavily discounted coupon.

As one source with knowledge of the situation said: “The timing would be a bit wacky.”

That said, Nikesh Arora, Google’s SVP and chief business officer, had been a very strong advocate of the original deal and might still want more heft in Google’s corner in the competitive local scene. One major plus is that Groupon could also help build a local salesforce to push Google+ Local, which includes Zagat, the online reviews site that competes against Yelp. Groupon might also support its Google Wallet business, which has largely failed to gain traction among consumers.

Another source familiar with the two companies said running a daily deals business is “operationally intensive, and it’s a muscle that Google doesn’t have, so from a synergy standpoint it would be complementary.” But, “if they are still serious about local, is that the business model for local that they want to pursue?”

eBay

For the past two years, the e-commerce company has aggressively been going after the local commerce market by helping transactions occur online or at a nearby store. Additionally, its PayPal division is moving fast into the physical payments space. Strong merchant relationships, like the ones Groupon has, could go a long way toward making those things happen faster.

EBay recently raised $3 billion in debt financing and has $7.3 billion cash on its balance street. Its stock price also has gone up more than 65 percent in the past year, giving it plenty of fire power to make a big move.

It also has the stomach for acquisitions. However, many of its purchases over the past two years have been about buying technology and talent. It bought RedLaser, the barcode scanning technology for $10 million; Milo.com, a local inventory company, for $75 million; and Zong, a mobile payments company, for $240 million. Over the years, it has also made substantial purchases, including GSI last year for $2.4 billion, Bill Me Later for $1.2 billion and Skype for $2.6 billion.

A few months back, the company entered the daily deals business with the launch of eBay Lifestyle Deals, which runs daily deals in a number of markets, including San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. To do so, eBay teamed up with Signpost, which arranges the deals with local merchants. Interestingly, Signpost is backed by Google Ventures, and already provides deals for Google Offers.

The company is also experimenting with eBay Now, a service that allows consumers to buy something on their phone and have it delivered within an hour. “They continue to be interested in local, and they have this experiment going on right now with eBay Now, but they are still iterating and figuring out the local angle,” one source said.

Likewise, PayPal’s local strategy is under development. It is trying to roll out physical payments to big-box retailers like Home Depot while also offering a credit card reader for smaller retailers called PayPal Here.

The biggest argument against this deal is that eBay may not need Groupon, and that it already has the infrastructure to roll out deals through partnerships — which would cost a whole lot less and be a lot less painful.

Amazon

Simply put, Amazon already has its own troubles with its significant stake in LivingSocial, which just slashed 400 jobs. In the third quarter, Amazon took an impairment charge of $169 million, or 37 cents a share, related to its stake in LivingSocial, resulting in the company reporting an overall third-quarter net loss of $274 million, or 60 cents a share.

Any potential Amazon-Groupon tie-up would then be a merger between LivingSocial and Groupon, creating perhaps an even bigger black hole that would also result in a lot of ongoing integration problems. While together LivingSocial and Groupon would easily make Amazon the largest daily deals company and up its local commerce efforts, it’s still not clear if the online retail giant wants to double down here.

Separately, Amazon has entered the daily deals business on its own with a service called Amazon Local that competes directly with LivingSocial and Groupon. The offers became particularly interesting to the company after it started using them to discount the price of its Kindle e-readers and tablets. If owners don’t want to see the offers, the tablets can cost up to $40 more.

The company has said that it essentially doesn’t need help building the business – it thinks it can get to scale fast in the space because it already has 164 million active customer accounts worldwide (which are defined as people who have made a purchase in the past year).

Perhaps most importantly, though, Amazon has a history of building, not buying.

Visa, MasterCard, American Express

These three payment companies have huge market values, and should not be discounted as players in the local commerce space. In addition, a year ago, all of them started looking for new revenue streams after the Durbin Amendment capped the amount that banks and card networks charge merchants on debit card transactions.

Already, many banks are sending targeted ads or deals to consumers based on their spending habits. However, it’s unclear whether they need to be the actual deal makers, or just act as a distribution system for advertisements and coupons. For example, MasterCard recently partnered with Gilt City, the daily deals division of Gilt Groupe. Through the partnership, MasterCard will be able to offer its users deals for restaurants, concert tickets and travel, and at the same time, help Gilt City get in front of some of the card issuer’s millions of users.

MasterCard may be the frontrunner of the three as a potential suitor. Not only has it shown direct interest in the space, American Express is still absorbing its acquisition of Revolution Money, for which it paid $300 million cash in 2010, and Visa has been active with its purchase of CyberSource for $2 billion in 2010. More recently, it made an investment in Square, the hot mobile payments company.

Other Suspects

A number of other companies could be put on a Groupon acquisition list, such as Yahoo, Microsoft and Facebook.

Microsoft and Yahoo both have the money, but have not done much in the space so far. An acquisition would allow them to catch up quickly, but would be expensive and largely not complementary with what they are doing already — which is almost nothing. Facebook, in particular, tried once to enter the space and failed and might be focused on other lower-hanging revenue sources.

Groupon could also look to private equity firms for a buyout, which would allow it to have some space while it fixed some of its issues.

Internationally, there is Japan’s Rakuten, which owns Buy.com in the U.S., and China’s e-commerce giant Alibaba, which has been looking at ways to enter the U.S. market.

Of course, Groupon might simply keep stumbling forward and hope it can turn itself around. But, at some point, without improved revenue and cohesion at the top levels, something is sure to bring pressure to its options. 

In fact, in afternoon trading today, the rumors continued to keep the stock elevated. Shares closed 3.76 percent higher today at $4.41 a share.

In what will be a major shift in how the Silicon Valley Internet giant sells online advertising, Yahoo’s new COO Henrique De Castro has briefed employees on a plan to move its sales organization to a “category” model, according to numerous sources close to the situation.

Simply put, that means its sales reps will sell all of Yahoo’s ad products, as well as its search offerings, in a vertical process organized around advertiser segments, such as automotive, entertainment and packaged goods.

This is how Google, where both De Castro and CEO Marissa Mayer recently worked, conducts its ad sales efforts. (After copying free food and smartphones, staff evaluation efforts and more, What Would Google Do seems to be strategery at Yahoo these days.)

In contrast, Yahoo has long sold its advertising in a regional and tiered organization against premium and performance inventory in display and search.

The move from regional to vertical is a “seismic shift,” said one source quite accurately. That’s because Yahoo’s go-to-market efforts have been designed to avoid vertical conflict and its sales staff have built up advertiser relations across many areas. In a vertical organization, those reps will be forced to give up these long-term relationships with marketers, some of which have been built over years.

There are, of course, many different ways to organize sales — and each has its fans and detractors. But one thing is clear: Making such a major change has potentially large ramifications on Yahoo’s financial performance, at least in the short term, since advertising makes up the bulk of its revenue.

The change might also result in some attrition among the sales staff, said sources, although many at Yahoo are expecting that De Castro will bring in his own execs from outside to help with the transition. (One interesting name I heard floated was former Googler Penry Price, who was close to De Castro when they both worked there. He is currently president of Media6Degrees, an ad targeting start-up.)

De Castro (pictured here) will need all the help he can get as he overhauls Yahoo’s sales efforts. Well-regarded Chief Revenue Officer Michael Barrett left Yahoo in mid-October after De Castro got the COO job.

His departure has left a large gap in sales leadership and in maintaining strong relationships with big advertisers and agencies. De Castro himself is not as well known in the ad marketplace, despite many years at Google in sales (more on that to come).

Currently, the key ad execs at Yahoo under De Castro are Peter Foster, who heads audience advertising, and Mark Ellis, VP of North American sales and global partnerships.

De Castro outlined the new ad org plan to staff immediately after a multi-day offsite with top sales leaders last week, at which Yahoo’s acquisition options in the ad tech market were also discussed.

Sources said De Castro noted that the changes could take place as early as January 1.

De Castro is also planning to have Yahoo’s annual global sales meeting for the end of January in Las Vegas. Last March, the gathering — then set for about 1,300 advertising staffers in Florida — was cancelled due to a restructuring under ousted CEO Scott Thompson.

In addition, sources said, Yahoo is planning on having a much more prominent presence at the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show — also taking place in Las Vegas in January — in order to solidify its relationships with advertisers.

Its big weapon at the giant annual confab will apparently be Mayer, who has not yet interfaced significantly with the company’s big ad clients since taking the top job in July. At CES, sources said, Yahoo is hoping the “Marissa Halo” — i.e. excitement around the telegenic exec — will help boost its business.

Detwiler Fenton, a Boston-based brokerage firm, said in a research note today that Microsoft is likely to sell just 500,000 to 600,000 Surface RTs in the December quarter, far below its previous expectation of one million to two million. The reason: Microsoft’s tablet strategy is in “disarray.”

“Lack of distribution is killing the product,” Detwiler Fenton explained. “Mixed reviews and a [$499] starting price tag certainly don’t help, but lack of retail exposure at Best Buy and others is severely depressing sales.”

In other words, with Surface available for purchase only from Microsoft Stores — and those stores are few and far between — consumers are unlikely to ever see the device, which makes them far less likely to purchase Surface, particularly given its price tag. And with so many other tablets available, there’s not much reason to seek out a Microsoft Store, assuming there even is one in reasonable proximity. Currently, there are just 31 Microsoft stores and 34 smaller holiday kiosks in the U.S. Given that paucity of stores, the average consumer’s best chance of seeing Surface these days is on a billboard.

That leaves Microsoft in a tough spot. Will the company stick to its original plan and continue to restrict Surface sales to its own stores, or will it expand distribution to other outlets in the hopes of clearing out inventory and spurring demand?

Microsoft did not respond to a request for comment.

Errata: An earlier version of this article said Surface pricing starts at $599.