<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Sam Johnston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/sam-johnston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>You Would Have Had a Better Shot With &quot;Crap Computing™&quot;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080818/you-would-have-had-a-better-shot-with-crap-computing%e2%84%a2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080818/you-would-have-had-a-better-shot-with-crap-computing%e2%84%a2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzzword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=3408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloud computing providers need not worry about finding an alternative buzzword to describe their services. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has refused Dell a trademark on the phrase “cloud computing.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloud computing providers need not worry about finding an alternative buzzword to describe their services. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77139082">refused</a> Dell (DELL) <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/cloud-computing/browse_thread/thread/1e14463d678a38f5">a  trademark on the phrase &#8220;cloud computing.&#8221;</a> Though Dell had been given preliminary notice in July that it could have the trademark, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9695">the USPTO seems to have thought better of that decision</a>. &#8220;&#8230; The applied-for mark merely describes a feature and characteristic of applicant&#8217;s services,&#8221; <a href="http://tmportal.uspto.gov/external/portal/tow?SRCH=Y&amp;isSubmitted=true&amp;details=&amp;SELECT=US+Serial+No&amp;TEXT=77139082#">the Office explained in its &#8220;non-final&#8221; refusal of Dell&#8217;s application</a>. &#8220;In addition to being merely descriptive, the applied-for mark appears to be generic in connection with the identified services and, therefore, incapable of functioning as a source-identifier for applicant&#8217;s services.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s a conclusion that makes perfect sense, as cloud computing consultant Sam Johnston notes. Said Johnston, <a href="http://samj.net/2008/08/dell-denied-cloud-computing-both.html"> &#8220;&#8230; Few of us think &#8216;Dell&#8217; when we think of &#8216;cloud computing&#8217;, even in this context.&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080818/you-would-have-had-a-better-shot-with-crap-computing%e2%84%a2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Would Have Had a Better Shot With "Crap Computing™"</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080818/you-would-have-had-a-better-shot-with-crap-computing%e2%84%a2-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080818/you-would-have-had-a-better-shot-with-crap-computing%e2%84%a2-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buzzword]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=3408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloud computing providers need not worry about finding an alternative buzzword to describe their services. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has refused Dell a trademark on the phrase “cloud computing.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cloud computing providers need not worry about finding an alternative buzzword to describe their services. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77139082">refused</a> Dell (DELL) <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/cloud-computing/browse_thread/thread/1e14463d678a38f5">a  trademark on the phrase &#8220;cloud computing.&#8221;</a> Though Dell had been given preliminary notice in July that it could have the trademark, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9695">the USPTO seems to have thought better of that decision</a>. &#8220;&#8230; The applied-for mark merely describes a feature and characteristic of applicant&#8217;s services,&#8221; <a href="http://tmportal.uspto.gov/external/portal/tow?SRCH=Y&amp;isSubmitted=true&amp;details=&amp;SELECT=US+Serial+No&amp;TEXT=77139082#">the Office explained in its &#8220;non-final&#8221; refusal of Dell&#8217;s application</a>. &#8220;In addition to being merely descriptive, the applied-for mark appears to be generic in connection with the identified services and, therefore, incapable of functioning as a source-identifier for applicant&#8217;s services.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s a conclusion that makes perfect sense, as cloud computing consultant Sam Johnston notes. Said Johnston, <a href="http://samj.net/2008/08/dell-denied-cloud-computing-both.html"> &#8220;&#8230; Few of us think &#8216;Dell&#8217; when we think of &#8216;cloud computing&#8217;, even in this context.&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080818/you-would-have-had-a-better-shot-with-crap-computing%e2%84%a2-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

