<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; screen size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/screen-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Is the iPad Cannibalizing Mac Sales? Not Really.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100517/is-the-ipad-cannibalizing-mac-sales-not-really/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100517/is-the-ipad-cannibalizing-mac-sales-not-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cannibalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Munster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maynard Um]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piper Jaffray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value proposition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=40783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reviewing NPD’s domestic retail data for the first month of Apple’s June quarter, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster says that the Mac has been relatively immune to cannibalization by the iPad, though the same cannot be said of the iPod.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/atd-ipad-event-032-150x150.jpg" width="150" height="150" alt="iPad Event Slideshow" class="alignright" />After reviewing NPD’s domestic retail data for the first month of Apple’s June quarter, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster says that the Mac has been relatively immune to cannibalization by the iPad, though the same cannot be said of the iPod.</p>
<p>&#8220;The iPad launched in US Apple retail stores on 4/3, impacting nearly the entire month of Apple&#8217;s sales in April. As a result, April NPD data gives us the first sign of the degree to which the iPad cannibalizes iPod or Mac sales,&#8221; Munster noted. &#8220;From the early NPD data, it appears that the iPad has a minimal cannibalization impact on Mac sales, and could be slightly cannibalizing iPod sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>The analyst doesn&#8217;t expect this to be a big problem for Apple (AAPL). &#8220;We believe in the long run Mac cannibalization will exist, but will be minimal,&#8221; he concludes. &#8220;Apple has successfully limited the iPad functionality to primarily content consumption, vs. content creation on a Mac. And relative to the iPod, the physical size of an iPad provides a meaningfully different value proposition (portability vs. screen size).&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously, it’s a little early for definitive calls on just what sort of effects the iPad is having on sales of Apple’s other products. That said, Munster’s analysis of NPD’s data does jibe with a <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100503/apples-ipad-angel-or-cannibal/">small survey by UBS analyst Maynard Um</a> that found that most iPad buyers do not view the device as a replacement for their traditional computers. </p>
<p>As I wrote in an earlier post, &#8220;So most likely, the iPad will prove additive for Apple. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if it generates a halo effect around the company’s products similar to that created by the iPod. Certainly, that’s the sense one has paying a visit to an Apple Store these days or being spotted with an iPad in public.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100517/is-the-ipad-cannibalizing-mac-sales-not-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kindle Now Only $299 More Than iPhone Kindle App</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090708/kindle-now-only-299-more-than-iphone-kindle-app/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090708/kindle-now-only-299-more-than-iphone-kindle-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Reader Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye strain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle DX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=21011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon hasn’t said how many Kindles it has sold since launching the device in 2007, but it may soon be selling quite a few more of them. The company today dropped the price of the six-inch Kindle to $299--$60 off of its previous price. That’s certainly not a dramatic reduction, but it may be enough to drive consumers who’ve held off on purchasing the device to reconsider.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/turing-c1-070609-ed04_v220257584_-250x154.gif" alt="" title="" width="250" height="154" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-21013" />Amazon hasn’t said how many Kindles it has sold since launching the device in 2007, but it may soon be selling quite a few more of them. The company today <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00154JDAI/ref=sv_kinh_0">dropped the price of the six-inch Kindle to $299</a>, $60 off of its previous price. That’s certainly not a dramatic reduction, but it may be enough to drive consumers who’ve held off on purchasing the device to reconsider.</p>
<p>That said, even at this reduced price, the Amazon Kindle still costs $299 more than Kindle for Apple&#8217;s iPhone, which I’ve found to be a compelling way to read books. After six or so novels, I have no complaints about eye strain, screen size or glare. And honestly, I think I’m reading more now than I ever did before simply because I always have the book I’m currently reading in my pocket.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>Today’s price cut makes you wonder if this presages a similar reduction for the Kindle DX, which at $489 could really use one. A bit too early, I suppose, since Amazon (AMZN) hasn’t yet announced pricing for subscriptions to the Washington Post (WPO) and New York Times (NYT). We&#8217;ll see, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090708/kindle-now-only-299-more-than-iphone-kindle-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

