The move to beef up communications expertise at the prominent Silicon Valley venture firm continues: Sequoia Capital has hired Andrew Kovacs, a well-regarded senior manager from Google, for a new job to help its portfolio companies with public relations and other related issues, sources said.

Google’s top flack Rachel Whetstone told staff about the move this past week, sources said, which will take place in mid-January.

Kovacs (pictured here, looking very GQ), who has been at the search giant for five years, has most recently headed PR for its apps unit.

His appointment comes after competing firms, including Andreessen Horowitz and Kleiner Perkins, bolstered talent to the comms areas of their firms, in order to better service the companies they invest in.

This is especially important to early-stage start-ups and their often young entrepreneurs, who usually have little experience with the media or with marketing. But such expertise is increasingly important in the crowded and ever-noisier tech sector, as companies try to rise above the fray.

Sequoia already has a longtime marketing partner, Mark Dempster, to whom Kovacs will be reporting, serving the firm’s companies in the U.S. and Israel. Kovacs will not be working on PR for Sequoia itself.

Some of Sequoia’s better-known start-ups include Dropbox, Tumblr and Eventbrite.

Mu Sigma helps some of the world’s biggest corporations make sense of the vast amounts of data being produced online. The company, which is headquartered in Chicago with most of its analysts in Bangalore, employs about 1,500 people, up from about 1,200 in June.

The latest funding round was led by General Atlantic, with Sequoia Capital, a current investor, raising its stake. Sequoia had invested $25 million in Mu Sigma in June. The valuation set by the latest fundraising wasn’t disclosed.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

This time the target is Cotendo, a company that uses a network of 30 data centers distributed around the world to put video content physically closer to consumers, and thus speed up delivery, especially to mobile devices. The acquirer is Internet concern Akamai, which says it will pay $268 million, plus the assumption of unvested options.

Cotendo had been reported to be the subject of a bidding war between Akamai and rival Juniper Networks. Breathless reports at the time, sourced to enthusiastic Israeli newspapers, valued Cotendo as high as $350 million. The deal will close during the first half of 2012.

Even at the lower price, the deal marks a nice exit for several U.S.-based venture capital funds. Cotendo raised $7 million from Sequoia Capital and Benchmark Capital in 2009, and then another $12 million in a round joined by Tenaya Capital last year. In June, it took a $17 million strategic investment from Juniper and Citrix Systems.

Cotendo had grown into an Akamai competitor, with a reputation for being faster at some things than Akamai, and also cheaper to boot. That made it an obvious Akamai target, given its history of acquiring rivals — usually after suing them. In 2005, it took out Speedera Networks for $130 million, after a contentious patent lawsuit between them. Akamai had sued Cotendo last November. So the next time Akamai sues someone, set your stopwatch, because the defendant may be the next one to be acquired.

Akamai’s statement on the deal is below:

Akamai to Acquire Cotendo

Combined technology and teams expected to help accelerate pace of innovation in cloud and mobile optimization

CAMBRIDGE, MA and SUNNYVALE, CA – December 22, 2011 – Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Cotendo announced today that the two companies have signed a definitive agreement for Akamai to acquire Cotendo.

Helping to mitigate the challenges of operating in a hyperconnected world, Akamai provides a secure platform over which businesses can engage users across the Web, mobile, cloud, or a mix of public and private network environments. Cotendo offers an integrated suite of Web and mobile acceleration services. The combination of the two companies’ technologies and teams is expected to increase the pace of innovation in the areas of cloud and mobile optimization.

“As we look to accelerate growth across the dynamic landscapes of cloud and mobile optimization, we are excited to be joining forces with Cotendo,” said Paul Sagan, president and CEO of Akamai. “Cotendo’s technology, partnerships and people are a strong complement to Akamai. Together, we believe there is tremendous opportunity for our combined technologies as enterprises embrace the move to the cloud and seek solutions for an increasingly mobile world.”

“The Cotendo team is very proud of our accomplishments in delivering proven and effective solutions for accelerating Web and mobile assets. By combining our innovative technology and employees with Akamai, we expect our customers and partners will gain access to a comprehensive, global platform and wider portfolio of leading-edge services supported by some of the most experienced providers in the industry,” said Ronni Zehavi, CEO and co-founder of Cotendo. “We look forward to working with Akamai in an effort to create the strongest offering in the industry.”

Founded in 2008, Cotendo is headquartered in Sunnyvale, CA, with a technology center in Israel. Cotendo currently has approximately 100 employees, with over 50 based in Israel.

Under terms of the agreement, Akamai will acquire all of the outstanding equity of Cotendo in exchange for a net cash payment of approximately $268 million, after expected purchase price adjustments, plus the assumption of outstanding unvested options to purchase Cotendo common stock. The closing of the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, is expected to occur in the first half of 2012.

Houzz has brought home $11.6 million in a Series B round led by Sequoia Capital and other investors, including earlier-stage investors Don Katz, Gary Ginsberg, Oren Zeev and Amos Wilnai. Alfred Lin, a VC at Sequoia and former top executive at Zappos, will join Zeev and others on Houzz’s board of directors.

Co-founder Adi Tatarko said Houzz has increased its traffic tenfold since its last funding round of $2 million in 2010, the site has also introduced e-commerce features to drive purchases of home goods.

Houzz first launched in early 2009, a few years after Tatarko and her husband, Alon Cohen, purchased a home and had a hard time finding the right contractors for home renovations, even with friends’ referrals. (Despite the wealth of options now at their fingertips through their own site, Tatarko says they haven’t yet completed the renovation of their own home.)

Tatarko and Cohen eventually quit their full-time jobs and focused on building up the site to what it is today — a fast-growing (and slightly addictive) home renovation Web site that consumers can browse to create idea books and where designers, contractors and renovation experts can upload their portfolios to in order to attract more clients.

There are now 30,000 professional profiles on the site, Tatarko says, spanning 50 metro areas in the U.S.; Houzz sees more than 50 million page views a month and 2.5 million uniques. Users of the Houzz iPad app, which has been downloaded a million times, browse for one hour on average.

The site also now offers more options for sharing through social media, as well as virtual price tags on certain items — a lamp, for example, or a love seat in a living-room setting — that will direct a user to a place where those items can be purchased.

Houzz is currently free for consumers and professionals using the site; Tatarko says they plan to keep it that way, generating revenue through a direct-advertising model. Houzz, she adds, is on track to become profitable in the next year.

Houzz’s growth comes as the U.S. home remodeling market is seeing signs of recovery. This follows a 12 percent drop in spending between 2007 and 2009, due to the financial crisis, according to a report from the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University. Home remodeling fared relatively well compared to new construction in 2009, with remodeling climbing to more than two-thirds of total residential investment; the market for renovations in the U.S. was said to have approached $300 billion in 2010. (The Harvard report does note, though, that all homeowners aren’t kitchen-gutting and paint-slapping-happy: Housing prices are depressed, and a record number of home owners are late on mortgage payments.)

Tatarko says she and Cohen will use the funding to invest in more engineers to continue to build out Houzz.

At that price, Jive will debut with a market capitalization of nearly $700 million, and has raised about $161 million.

The offering will amount to a nice payout for Jive’s investors and shareholders. Based on the reported share holdings in Jive’s S-1 filing with the SEC, here’s how some of them are making out — assuming the share price stays at $12:

• Sequoia Capital: 16.95 million shares, amounting to more than one-third of Jive’s equity, worth $203.4 million.

• Kleiner Perkins: 6.7 million shares, worth $80 million.
• Bill Lynch, Matthew Tucker: Jive’s co-founders own 7.1 million shares each, amounting to combined equity of nearly 32 percent, worth $85 million apiece.
• CEO Tony Zingale, the former CEO of Mercury Interactive who oversaw its sale to Hewlett-Packard, has 3.6 million shares, worth $43 million.
• John McCracken, Jive’s senior VP of worldwide sales, has 784,000 shares, worth $9.4 million.
• CFO Bryan J. LeBlanc has 694,000 shares, worth $8.3 million.
• Bill Lanfri, a Jive director, former CEO of Big Bear Networks (a Sequoia investment), and a founding investor in RedBack Networks, has 581,000 shares, worth $7 million.
• Robert F. Brown, Jive’s senior VP of client services, has 434,000, worth $5.2 million.
• Brian J. Roddy, senior VP of engineering, has 429,000 shares, worth $5.1 million.

Remedy Health Media, a New York-based health information company, has bought HealthCentral, a start-up that offers online clinical and patient tools, community and content in a variety of topic areas.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the Arlington, Va.-based HealthCentral has raised $50 million from investors such as the Carlyle Group, IAC/InterActiveCorp, Polaris Venture Partners and Sequoia Capital. Allen & Co., which was HealthCentral’s financial adviser for the transaction, was also an investor.

The market for online-based information about health has been a fast-growing one, but it’s still a nascent arena.

Here’s the official press release:

Remedy Health Media Acquires HealthCentral: Creates Industry-Leading Health Information and Technology Platform

NEW YORK, NY – Remedy Health Media, America’s fastest-growing health information and technology company, today announced its acquisition of HealthCentral, a leading provider of online clinical and patient community resources and tools that help millions of patients and caregivers take control of their health and improve their well-being. The acquisition brings together two companies with the shared mission of empowering patients and caregivers with the information and applications needed to efficiently navigate the healthcare landscape to receive better health outcomes. The acquisition is expected to close this week. Terms were not disclosed.

“This acquisition means Remedy now provides the health information industry’s leading portfolio of digital, mobile, and point-of-care information and technology products,” said Remedy Chief Executive Officer, Mike Cunnion.

HealthCentral’s CEO, Christopher M. Schroeder, adds, “This combination creates real opportunities for innovation in an industry segment that is growing rapidly and seeking new solutions. All of us at HealthCentral are very excited that the union of the two companies and the strength, scope, and reach of the new Remedy will be a unique force for better health and wellness.”

With the addition of HealthCentral, Remedy Health Media creates a market-leading platform for healthcare audiences seeking proprietary information and technology to manage their health concerns on their terms as well as marketing partners who want to connect with patients and caregivers on a number of platforms: online, in doctors’ offices, pharmacies, and through their mobile devices. The new Remedy Health Media will influence more than 150 million consumers annually. The company’s reach now includes 23 million unique monthly visitors to its health websites, more than 17 million patients and caregivers at pharmacy counters nationwide, a 20-million member customer database, and a network of more than 600,000 physicians.

“With the acquisition of HealthCentral, we’ve dramatically increased our online reach, sales capacity and our ability to create industry leading health information and technology applications,” notes Cunnion. “The combination creates exciting opportunities to provide even more value to our audiences, customers and strategic partners.”

Remedy Health Media is a Veronis Suhler Stevenson (VSS) company; a leading global private investment firm focused on the information, education, media, communications and business services industries. “Communications growth will be driven by the convergence of technologies in digital and mobile platforms,” said David Bainbridge, Managing Director, Veronis Suhler Stevenson. “Nowhere is this more evident than in the health and wellness sector where the ability to access accurate information is paramount.”

HealthCentral is backed by leading interactive media and technology investors IAC/InterActiveCorp, Polaris Ventures, Sequoia Capital, The Carlyle Group and Allen & Company. Notes Alan Spoon of Polaris Ventures, “We are thrilled to join forces with Mike and the Remedy team. This combination is a unique opportunity to create the largest and most innovative platform for health seekers looking to take action on their terms, and connecting them with our partners and clients.”

Schroeder will remain involved in the business as a consultant to Remedy and the board of directors, and has been named an Advisor to Polaris Ventures.

It wouldn’t be a bad exit for a bunch of U.S.-based venture capital funds, either. Cotendo raised $7 million from Sequoia Capital and Benchmark Capital in 2009, and then another $12 million in a round joined by Tenaya Capital last year. In June, it took a $17 million strategic investment from Juniper and Citrix Systems.

Cotendo is an Akamai competitor. Its content delivery system uses a network of distributed servers around the world to put content physically close to consumers, and it specializes in speeding up delivery to mobile phones and tablets, which is a lot like the business Akamai is known for. The thing about Cotendo is that it has a reputation for being faster at some things than Akamai, and also cheaper.

Akamai has been known to buy competitors. In 2005, it took out Speedera Networks for $130 million, after a contentious patent lawsuit between them. Part of the story driving the Akamai takeover chatter is the fact that Akamai sued Cotendo last November. Akamai CFO J.D. Sherman will be speaking at a Credit Suisse conference in Phoenix on Wednesday. Maybe he’ll shed a little light on the situation.

Meanwhile, analyst Brian Marshall of ISI likes the idea of Juniper acquiring Cotendo in a joint deal with AT&T. Since AT&T is a big Juniper customer, accounting for about 8 percent of sales, and AT&T is also a big Cotendo customer, it would mean good things for Juniper’s relationship with AT&T. If the numbers being reported are correct, it would amount to about 10 percent of Juniper’s cash on hand, which was about $3.4 billion as of the quarter ended Sept. 30. It would be a much bigger deal for Akamai, which had $688 million in combined cash and short-term investments as of the same date.

But here’s a contender: TuneIn is a radio app that gets more usage on iPhone and Android than Pandora or Spotify, according to a recent study.

In fact, TuneIn told AllThingsD last week, in October it had 30 million active users listening to 58,000 different stations from all over the world, with 200 new streams, podcasts or on-demand channels added every day.

Palo Alto, Calif.-based TuneIn is not your average start-up. It was founded in 2002 in Dallas as RadioTime, and for years built an online directory for radio stations that was available through partnerships with makers of devices like the Logitech Squeezebox and Sonos.

Then an outside developer made a popular iPhone app called TuneIn that used the directory to help users stream and record radio on their phones.

RadioTime bought TuneIn last year, and renamed itself and its radio apps for nearly every phone, living room and car app platform. Some 150 of those platforms have TuneIn available now, many of them preinstalled.

TuneIn users can browse among stations and genres; they can also search for an artist or song to find stations that are currently playing it. Most of the apps are free, but on iOS, Android and BlackBerry, users can pay for a pro version that lets them record what they’re listening to.

Late last year, Sequoia Capital secretly invested $6 million in the company and moved it to California. In recent months, it helped find a replacement for the longtime CEO with gaming industry vet John Donham. Donham most recently co-founded Metaplace and sold it to Disney, where he ran technology and product operations for Disney Interactive Media Group.

Donham (pictured below) said in an interview last week that he was happily going about his business at Disney and about to blow off a call from Sequoia’s recruiter because he’d never heard of TuneIn, when he realized he already had the app installed on his phone. Then he looked at some of the glowing TuneIn app reviews from people listening to their hometown radio from halfway around the globe. And then he got a look at the usage stats.

“There’s nothing viral about TuneIn,” Donham recalled thinking. “How did it get to millions of people with no viral and no marketing?” He joined in August.

Of course, there’s a good reason that Spotify and Pandora get more love than TuneIn. They’re creating new music discovery experiences, rather than simply translating existing radio content for a new medium. And they are personalized and social.

(This weekend, while listening to a random pop station on TuneIn at the gym, I heard its local ads for a laser hair removal shop in Minnesota. It’s probably not going to be getting my business anytime soon.)

But while apps like Spotify and Pandora may be shiny and better-known, Donham said, radio is still the top way people find new music.

For now, TuneIn doesn’t add its own advertising, though that will probably come, Donham said. The company is starting a campaign this week with listener-funded stations — like its local KQED — to solicit donations from listeners directly within its apps. It will also soon add discovery and sharing features.

Update: This story was updated to reflect that Sequoia Capital’s investment came in 2010.

The anecdote appears in a new profile of Dropbox in the latest issue of Forbes, which also disclosed that the service is on track to hit $240 million in sales this year, even though the vast majority of its users pay nothing to use it.

But the meat of the story comes further in: Dropbox just closed a massive $250 million Series B round of funding, at an implied valuation of $4 billion, from Benchmark Capital, Goldman Sachs, Greylock Partners, Institutional Venture Partners, RIT Capital Partners and Valiant Capital Partners. Early investors Sequoia Capital, Accel Partners, and Hadi and Ali Partovi also participated in the round, bringing Dropbox’s total funding to date to $257.2 million. Houston’s stake, Forbes says, amounts to 15 percent of the equity, which would be worth about $600 million.

Houston may yet live to regret turning Jobs down. The Apple CEO proposed another meeting that never happened, then managed to single out Dropbox for disparagement as part of his iCloud keynote in June. That got the attention of Houston, who quickly fired off a memo to his team that included a list of once-hot companies that later crashed: MySpace, Netscape, Palm and Yahoo. Apple — which once viewed Dropbox as the sort of “strategic asset” for which it keeps its $70 billion war chest stuffed — is now the competition.

Fast forward to October, and Slootman is not only CEO of a new company, ServiceNow, but is getting his old band from Data Domain — which he sold to EMC in 2009 after a takeover battle with NetApp — back together.

So what is ServiceNow? It was started in 2003 by Fred Luddy, the former CTO of help-desk management outfits Peregrine Systems and Remedy, one of which is now part of Hewlett-Packard, the other part of BMC. The ServiceNow idea is basically to compete with HP and BMC by replacing those old on-premise help desk management applications with a cloud-based software-as-a-service offering.

ServiceNow has grown like crazy, doubling its sales every year for eight years in a row — it now has 500 employees and boasts $130 million in recurring revenue. Slootman joined as CEO in April. And now he’s hired a bunch of his old buddies from Data Domain to join him.

Having earlier in the week tapped Arne Josefsberg — a 25-year Microsoft veteran who was most recently general manager of the Windows Azure service — as its chief technology officer, ServiceNow has just hired a batch of Data Domain guys away from EMC:

• Michael Scarpelli, the former CFO of Data Domain will now be ServiceNow’s CFO.
• Dan McGee, the onetime senior vice president of engineering, will be — you guessed it — senior vice president of engineering.
• David Schneider will be senior vice president of worldwide sales and service, taking the same title he held at Data Domain.

Though people know Slootman primarily for his work in the storage business at Data Domain — which he ultimately sold to EMC for $2.1 billion — he calls his journey into that line of business a “diversion.” Before Data Domain, he was a senior executive at Borland Software. “Before I was a storage guy, I was an applications guy. I worked in the software layer, so this is right in my wheelhouse,” he told me. “People say the cloud is hot, but what’s even hotter is cloud management, because people need software to manage it, and we’re right smack in the middle of that set of issues.”

So what’s the plan for ServiceNow? To kick things up a notch, naturally. “We’re getting the company IPO-ready,” Slootman says. And while it hasn’t hired any bankers yet, it’s not for nothing that Slootman just brought in a team of trusted execs who were along for the ride with Data Domain’s 2007 IPO and subsequent acquisition.

If and when it happens, a ServiceNow IPO will be rather different from so many others in recent history. ServiceNow is already cash-flow positive: It has $70 million in cash on the balance sheet, Slootman says, and started with practically no venture capital. It took a small $2.5 million round from JMI Equity in 2005; in 2009, Sequoia Capital invested by buying out some employees’ shares, and Sequoia’s Doug Leone joined the board of directors.

So what happened at Greylock? “I found out that I don’t have the temperament or disposition or DNA set to be a venture capitalist,” Slootman told me. “A lot of people told me I wouldn’t last, and they knew me better than I knew myself. If you’re going to fail at something, it’s best to fail fast and move on to the next thing.”

Here’s some electric weekend reading for those interested in the push and pull between venture investors and start-ups in the frothy Web 2.0 environment.

In an email to Airbnb CEO and co-founder Brian Chesky (which I obtained, embedded below), former Facebook exec Chamath Palihapitiya, who now runs an investment fund called the Social+Capital Partnership, is passing on participating in the recent $112 million round for the hot online rental site that was announced in July.

The deal — which values the company at $1.2 billion — has not officially closed yet, but includes venture firms such as DST Global, Andreessen Horowitz and others. Previous investors include Sequoia Capital.

Palihapitiya confirmed to me that it was his email and that his possible investment in Airbnb was small.

That said, his concerns center on how much voting control of new investors’ preferred shares the founders have in the latest round and also a $22.5 million cashing out, $21 million of which is going to those founders.

Another $9.6 million is being used to buy secondary stock from current Airbnb shareholders, who have to render parts of their vested stakes for the money.

Such wrangling between investors and entrepreneurs is not uncommon in Silicon Valley these days, as ever-dumber money chases ever-more-powerful geeks. But Palihapitiya’s email is a smart, reasonable and well-written argument to stop the madness.

According to sources close to Airbnb, the numbers that he refers to below are accurate, as is what appears to be an unusual level of voting control by its founders. Presumably, it is to protect the company from possible future sales on the secondary markets and to keep control with its founders as the number of investors grows.

In any case, the Palihapitiya email to Chesky is well worth the read (I have removed email addresses as a courtesy):

From: Chamath Palihapitiya
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:16:05 -0700

To: Brian Chesky

Subject: Airbnb financing…

Brian,

Cc Marc, Reid, my deal team

Thanks again for giving me the chance to participate in your latest financing. I had a chance to review the docs at length yesterday and I wanted to follow up as, quite honestly, I’ve never seen a deal like this over ~60 investments I’ve done and I’m pretty concerned.

I’m all for getting the best valuation you can, minimizing dilution and maximizing control. We did this brilliantly at Facebook…all of our financings (except our first $$$ from Peter Thiel) were done not out of necessity but opportunity. As such, our investors had virtually no control and it resulted in a much better outcome. As we’ve discussed, I generally don’t believe investors add much to a success story and so minimizing their impact is a great strategy when you are onto something that is working.

This said, while several of these concepts are reflected in the current deal, there is one big thing that I am fundamentally against and violates my principles and will prevent me from participating in your round. When I saw that you guys were taking $31M out of the company, I didn’t think much of it as I just assumed it would entirely be via a secondary sale.

But as I understand the deal, it seems that you are doing only $9.6M in secondary and $22.5M as a dividend to common (of which $21M goes to you and your co-founders). I am really uncomfortable with this and don’t think its in the spirit of building a good, long term business. Effectively, it is a strategy that allows you guys to take money out of the business and not dilute yourself — I’m not sure why this is such a big deal when you guys are almost 90% vested and the financing is at $1.2B where your dilution is marginal. Further, it excludes many of the employees that probably have helped you and your co–founders get the company to this place as most of these folks probably don’t have any stock but have unexercised stock options and thus won’t get a dividend.

My basic principle on this stuff is that if you want liquidity, that’s fine, but you should make it available to everyone. Otherwise, no one should get it. Your current deal is the farthest away from this principle that I’ve seen in a while…this strategy has been done once before — at Groupon. We can see how “well” they are doing and how short term the investor community is now viewing their motives. I really think you can do better than this…and that you are better than this.

Separately, when you look at successful tech companies, it seems that dividends are an approach used by cash rich operations to distribute excess earnings — in fact, the most successful, cash rich tech company in the world, Apple, hasn’t issued a dividend and they have more than $75B in cash! Again, while I think Airbnb will be a good company, this is nowhere near the truth now — you guys still need to scale and build this thing for the future.

I really think you are onto something but I would implore you to not take the easy way out. Treat your employees the same as you’d treat yourself. Do things that you will be proud of and can defend to anyone including your Board, employees, prospective hires etc. In such a competitive hiring market, you are competing with not just your obvious competitors, but also any successful tech company who is also looking for great talent. A principle that treats your employees as well as you’d treat yourself is a huge strategy for differentiation, retention and long term happiness of the exact types of people you will need to be successful. In contrast, if you are viewed as self-dealing and shady, it will only hurt your long term prospects…

In summary, I’m passing on this financing because I strongly disagree with what’s going on. I’m not sure who advocated this approach but I did mention this to Reid [Hoffman, another Airbnb investor via Greylock Partners] last night and he was of a similar mind to myself and surprised this was the approach being taken. If you want some good advice — I would ask that you consider pinging him about different ways to think about going about the liquidity portion.

If you change your mind on how to close this financing, let me know and I’d love to reconsider. Otherwise, good luck and lets keep in touch.

Take care,

Chamath

Now we have another entrant called Birst, which today will announce what it calls a Business Intelligence appliance. No, it’s not hardware — that’s what I thought, too . It’s actually software that you install locally on your own on-premise servers. And yet it’s still a software-as-a-service (SaaS) offering. How does that work?

Having already become a player in the basic cloud-based BI business, the company realized that most of the data that makes BI valuable in the first place doesn’t live in the cloud but actually is used with applications that run behind the firewall.

I talked with Birst co-CEO Brad Peters, who told me that the software runs like a SaaS product — you access it through a browser, just like you would any other typical SaaS product, and you get the same benefits, including zero worries about upgrading or adding new features. But you also get the benefit of having it run on-premise behind the firewall. “It’s the exact same experience as with the cloud,” he says.

The whole point of BI, Peters says, is to take data created in various business applications — whether it’s SAP, Salesforce.com, Concur, Omniture, Siebel or what have you — into a dashboard, where it is arranged into a graphical presentation or report that you can then use to make business decisions.

The textbook case for BI is comparing data on marketing spend to deals. If you find you’re spending a lot of money on one type of marketing campaign that seems not to be generating leads and deals, and not enough on one that seems to be working better, you can see the pattern and make needed changes, Peters says. “What BI is really about is taking the raw data and synthesizing it so that business people can act on it,” rather than relying on spreadsheets.

Big companies like SAP and Oracle are in the BI business, too, but their solutions cost a lot of money and are therefore aimed more often than not at bigger companies. Yet Birst has its share of larger customers: Citrix Systems is a Birst customer, as is Rackspace, the Web and cloud services host.

So far, Birst has raised a combined $20 million in two rounds from Dag Ventures, Sequoia Capital and Hummer Winblad. Peters said the company is keeping most of its funding details close to the vest — he wouldn’t say how much Birst’s most recent round was, for example — arguing that there’s been too much attention paid so far to BI start-ups and how much money they’ve raised. “Ultimately, a software company needs to make money, and BI is really hard,” he says. “You can waste a lot of money really easily. There’s been about $300 million raised by companies trying to do BI, so clearly the amount of money raised doesn’t correlate to success.” Those sounds like words to the wise.

Of course I have something to say about the news yesterday that AOL would be a key investor in a new early-stage venture fund being started by TechCrunch’s perpetually petulant editor Michael Arrington — with a big, fat and decidedly greasy assist from a panoply of Silicon Valley’s most powerful VC firms and angel investors.

Arrington has previously called me “chief whiner” — oooh, buuuurn, although fair enough, since I have compared him to an egomaniac turtle named Yertle in the past — about my nagging him over the importance of upholding standards of fairness and ethics in journalism.

So as not to let him down, let me begin the whining.

First, my initial reaction when I first heard about the deal: Ugh. Sigh. Hopelessly corrupt. Now 100 percent more icky! A giant, greedy, Silicon Valley pig pile.

I was upset.

By early evening, after my kids told me to chillax, my dark mood had changed to accept that the transaction — however profoundly distasteful to me — was part and parcel of the insidious log-rolling, back-scratching ecosystem that has happened in every other center of power in the universe since the beginning of time.

And so it goes in Silicon Valley.

In fact, the creation of a $20 million investment kitty that Arrington has dubbed CrunchFund is simply the formalization of a long-standing arrangement that has already been going on since he founded his popular tech blog.

That is to say, in which the basic standards of journalism are first warped by calling it newfangled truth-telling and then endlessly corroded by using a wily and unusually aggressive combination of favors and threats to extract, from start-ups and VCs in need of press, both exclusive access and information.

And now, inevitably, money.

This could have been a lot cleaner, of course, by Arrington simply resigning from TechCrunch, becoming a VC and perhaps starting a new blog where his agenda is much clearer, from which he could huff and puff away as he does with much entertaining gusto at real and (mostly) imagined slights.

There is certainly precedent for VCs blogging, including Fred Wilson, Brad Feld and Ben Horowitz. And, despite my criticisms about ethics, it is clear that Arrington is a talented writer whose unique voice would be even stronger if it was truly seen as separate from what has become a news organization.

But because of his obvious need to be the center of attention — requiring the ermine kingmaker mantle and foisting his patented I’m-here-to-tell-it-like-it-is attitude on us all — that appears to be impossible.

(By the way, I await Arrington’s usual inane rant about the fictional conflicts of interest related to my gay Google marriage anytime now in 3 … 2 … 1, always and purposefully leaving out the pertinent facts that I can only wed one person, get no financial benefit and am also a prominent critic of the scary search behemoth, while he can make a badillion questionable and grossly tangled investments.)

Personal annoyances aside, what’s most interesting here is the group of Silicon Valley power players who lined up to bow and scrape and then hand over a small pile of dough to the blogger who would be king.

They include: Sequoia Capital, Redpoint Ventures, Kleiner Perkins, Greylock Partners, Austin Ventures and Accel Partners, as well as individual investments from partners at Benchmark Capital and Andreessen Horowitz, entrepreneur Kevin Rose and DST Global’s Yuri Milner. And, of course, the inevitable Arrington BFF Ron Conway.

Holy googa mooga, that would be, well, everyone, except Ashton Kutcher and Justin Timberlake (who will surely appear soon enough).

As one person also pointed out to me, I don’t recall this many competing VCs investing in one company, let alone another venture fund.

It goes without saying that the reasons they all decided to jump in this fetid pool with abandon are quite varied, if all entirely compromised.

One investor told me — off the record, naturally — that he thought it would be an interesting experiment to see what happened and so he wanted in, especially since everyone else was doing it.

Another well-known VC said that there is no downside to being financially affiliated, especially in attracting talent to its start-ups, with Arrington and, by extension, TechCrunch.

The well-respected Reid Hoffman of Greylock was the only one brave enough to talk on the record, explaining the reasoning pretty clearly:

“Techcrunch will get some real deal flow from entrepreneurs that we would otherwise not see, because they have established a prominent position as the SV/Tech industry information feed. As many tech entrepreneurs read it — both within Silicon Valley and globally — and view the information news feed to be their target for announcing themselves to the world, Crunchfund will have access to deal flow to these diverse and early stage companies. Some of these companies will be the kind of early stage companies with billion-dollar potential that Greylock invests in.”

There you have it: No one can afford to be out of the deal flow in these times, even if it means cutting corners.

While TechCrunch’s owner, AOL, said Arrington will no longer be managing editor, with only writing duties at the site he dominates and with no editorial control, Hoffman’s use of TechCrunch for CrunchFund was accurate, because in the eyes of many they are interchangeable.

That’s due to the fact that Arrington still breaks or is clearly the source for important stories on the site and, more importantly, is the big swinging dude who attracts all the eager entrepreneurs to the party. He is the fulcrum of that site, even as it has grown.

And so it will remain, I am guessing, no matter how much AOL insists it will not be so, because the easy questions pile up quickly:

Will Arrington keep doing what are clearly news stories, for example, even though he protesteth too much — as he did in the New York Times yesterday — that he is not a journalist?

And, if so, is it right for him to do so given his insider status, creating a nonparity of sourcing and crystal clear conflicts of interest?

Most of all, can he resist his palpable love of news-breaking and scoops, even if he gets them in ever more unseemly ways?

As if to make it all pretty, Arrington told reporters yesterday that he has put a clause in his limited partnership agreement so he can report on anything he likes, and in any way, about his investors and their companies, however confidential, except those he invests in.

O joyous day! Freedom of the press is preserved and our sacred First Amendment can breathe a sigh of relief, now that it is enshrined in an unholy blogger-VC LP agreement.

After pausing for a moment so that Thomas Jefferson and Edward R. Murrow can stop spinning in their graves, you can go down this road for many increasingly bumpy miles, which only becomes more twisted and confusing as it continues.

I finally talked to one investor in CrunchFund, who said simply and honestly: “It’s not that much money, so who cares?”

Indeed, who does care anymore about crossing what had long been very bright lines in journalism and, if you want to get all cosmic, in life?

Obviously, most of all, not AOL, or its CEO Tim Armstrong, or its head of content, Arianna Huffington. The pair, for whatever reason, decided to make a startling exception for Arrington from a rule that explicitly bars reporters at its media units from investing in the companies they cover.

That happened after he recently did a complete 180 from a previous decision to stop investing and jumped right back in, leaving Armstrong and Huffington to clean up the ethical mess.

They only made it worse, with their decision to throw journalism under the bus by letting Arrington do as he pleased, while touting how important it was for other content sites at AOL to remain more pure.

In the spirit of full disclosure, these kinds of ethical lapses are endemic these days in journalism. Case in point: The appalling phone-hacking controversy taking place at News Corp.’s News International unit in Britain.

While I cannot speak for Dow Jones, I can say that the behavior in another News Corp. property certainly takes its toll on those who adhere to higher standards at the company, especially when it comes to morale.

Thus, I can imagine how others feel at AOL — including those you-know-who-you-are silent ones at TechCrunch — who can’t and, more to the point, wouldn’t make the deals Arrington has been allowed to get away with.

It is not a good feeling, I can assure you.

And, while I have not spoken to her about it, I’d imagine that Huffington cannot be thrilled to be pushing for better journalism at AOL and trying to burnish her cred by hiring some top reporters, while also having to deal with this.

That’s okay, because Armstrong was perfectly willing to do the awkward pretzel-twist needed to explain away the controversial situation, also in an interview with the Times:

“TechCrunch is a different property and they have different standards. We have a traditional understanding of journalism with the exception of TechCrunch, which is different but is transparent about it.”

In this case, Tim, I am sorry to inform you that transparency is a complete canard and is more likely to end up covering up a lot more transgressions than it ever will reveal.

And, essentially and lazily sloughing it off by saying, “That’s just Mike being Mike,” is not going to cut it, at least not with me.

Not that any amount of tsk-tsking about it matters, I suppose, as Arrington finally gets his fervent Pinocchio-on-a-star wish to be a real-boy VC, can add yet another tainted buck to the pile of billions his venture pals already have, and just call it another typical day in Silicon Valley.

Still, when you are the designated whiner-in-chief, it is pretty much all one can do.

Inkling CEO Matt MacInnis, citing IBISWorld data, noted in a recent interview that the U.S. textbook market was worth $16 billion in 2010 — versus $15 billion for “trade books” (fiction, literary non-fiction, everything else). That’s depicted in the chart below.

Inkling has 60 employees and hundreds of offshore workers who help format books, which MacInnis said he expects to increase to thousands next year.

Today, Inkling’s best sellers are medical textbooks. The company is eagerly anticipating back-to-school season, especially in a year when many colleges and graduate schools are experimenting with student iPads, MacInnis said.

MacInnis said Inkling will also soon expand beyond textbooks, though he’s keeping the details under wraps for now.

The start-up, backed by Greylock Partners, Sequoia Capital, Globespan Capital Partners and Jafco Ventures, tapped McLaughlin in a sign that it is gearing up for an IPO. I talked today with Asheem Chandna, a Palo Alto Networks director and partner at Greylock, about the new hire and about the crazy growth the company is going through right now.

AllThingsD: Asheem, I always ask people to start at the top: What is Palo Alto Networks and what does it do?

Asheem Chandna: We’re in the network security space. We build next-generation firewalls technologies. We ship an appliance that contains some subscription services on it so in a way it combines the business model of Cisco with that of Salesforce.com.

And how big is the business?

We disclosed that we’re on a run-rate to $200 million in revenue, and we have 4,500 customers. We’re cash-flow positive for the past five quarters, and we’ve been shipping product for 16 consecutive quarters. We have about 450 employees in the company today and we expect to add another 350 in the coming 12 months.

So you have more than 4,500 customers. Can you name any? Security companies are often reticent to do that.

We have many we can name, several of which we’ve done seven-figure deals with. Some we announced today: Qualcomm, eBay, Verisign, Cricket, the Los Angeles Community College district. Others we’ve named before include SanDisk and Constellation Energy.

And what prompted you to hire Mark McLaughlin from Verisign? Was it him or was it his experience at Verisign that got you interested?

What we were really focused on was leadership capability, what Jim Collins would call a Level 5 leader and the raw IQ, intensity and discipline. We’ve known Mark for several years, he’s an exceptional leader and one of the best leaders I personally know.

How did the search go down?

We had a search under way for eight months. It’s taken that long because this is a one-in-a-decade company. It’s one of the fastest growing companies in enterprise IT. We were deliberate and focused on really finding the right person, who would be a good cultural fit with the team. We hired Russell Reynolds to help us with the search. We reviewed more than 150 people in detail, and interviewed more than two dozen people. There were many senior executives at public companies who were interested in this position.

Every security company tries to solve a particular problem, and my understanding is that Palo Alto Networks can detect traffic coming from certain applications. So when I’m signed into Facebook or Tweetdeck or Skype on a network where your gear is in use, you can detect it and watch out for good and evil traffic on those applications, and block the bad traffic. Is that right?

Exactly. That’s one of the three basic innovations that are our bread and butter. The one you just described is really our headline feature. We can uniquely identify applications and users as they pass through the firewall and the network. The second is around malware. We can scan for malware at very high speeds, which is also something that hasn’t been done before. Finally, we collapse multiple network functions that are usually done on individual appliances into one large system but without a degradation of performance. We do Web filtering and intrusion detection, which are traditionally done on separate network appliances. Network administrators are struggling with appliance fatigue. We are giving them the ability to roll all those things into a single appliance with no degradation of performance.

So, since everyone is going to start asking: When are you going public? Are you going to be hiring bankers soon?

We haven’t set a date for any of that yet. The focus is really to build and grow the company to the next level. Going public is just another milestone. We want to be the biggest independent network security company in the industry.

Jawbone, the maker of elegant mobile and wireless devices, has added $70 million in funding to its coffers, with a new investment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

The San Francisco-based company has now raised a total of $170 million, which includes a recent $49 million venture round from high-profile Silicon Valley VC firm Andreessen Horowitz in March.

Jawbone also has raised money from Sequoia Capital, Khosla Ventures and a number of prominent angel investors.

All are making a big bet on consumer electronics, an always dicey arena, and on Jawbone’s innovative products, such as its initial Bluetooth headsets.

The start-up has more recently expanded its offerings to the Jambox Smart Speaker, which has become a fast-selling wireless speaker.

Both have been particularly popular with Apple users, and Jawbone has been prominently featured in its retail stores.

Jawbone CEO Hosain Rahman certainly sounds like Apple CEO Steve Jobs when he talks about an all-encompassing digital solution.

“We’re going to get into some new categories of products,” said Rahman, about what he plans to do with the new funding, especially around making smaller, embedded and wearable devices. “We want to be an end-to-end experience.”

While he would not be specific, Rahman said that this area of computing is changing to encompass the entire mobile lives of its consumers.

“We want to leverage the power of the tool in your pocket,” he said. “This is just the beginning.”

Here’s the official press release from Jawbone:

JAWBONE SECURES $70M IN GROWTH FUNDING FROM J.P. MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT

Jawbone to Expand its Products and Services for the Mobile Lifestyle

SAN FRANCISCO –- July 12, 2011 –- Jawbone, a leading innovator of products and services for the mobile lifestyle, today announced it has secured $70 million in funding from investors advised by J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Jawbone is one of the largest privately-held, venture capital-backed consumer electronics companies in the world, and this round brings total investment in Jawbone close to $170 million to date. The funding will allow Jawbone to continue its rapid growth and expand into new markets and categories, building on its successful portfolio of premium mobile products and services.

“We seek to invest in the best high-growth companies,” said Larry Unrein, managing director of J.P. Morgan Asset Management. :Given the widespread adoption of smartphones globally, we are seeing a massive shift in user expectations around having a complete, high-quality and seamless experience wherever they are. Jawbone, with its long-standing expertise in mobile user experience, has been delighting customers by enabling them to get the most out of their smartphones through a combination of cutting-edge technology and great design. We believe Jawbone is poised to be the next great mobile computing company coming out of Silicon Valley.”

“Funding from J.P. Morgan Asset Management is fantastic for us as we continue to rapidly expand our business,” said Hosain Rahman, CEO of Jawbone. “As people’s digital lives become increasingly centered around mobile devices, we see no shortage of opportunities for our technology and products to unlock the potential of a full mobile experience. The support of J.P. Morgan Asset Management will help us be even more aggressive in our pursuit of these opportunities.”

Jawbone’s innovation has resulted in unprecedented demand for its products and services on a global scale. The company is known for leading and disrupting categories with its breakthrough software, strong commitment to design, and award-winning products.

“Jawbone is one of the most important mobile companies with which Sequoia Capital has partnered,” said Roelof Botha, partner at Sequoia Capital and Jawbone board member. “Jawbone’s relentless building of great products that consumers love gives the company a unique ability to redefine established markets. We are delighted to have J.P. Morgan Asset Management on board.”

Jawbone first made its mark in the industry by creating an entirely new class of intelligent Bluetooth® headsets, and has successfully expanded its portfolio of products for the past decade. The JAMBOX Smart Speaker™ is one of the best-selling speakers globally, and the recently-launched Jawbone ERA™ headset is the first to include HD audio and motion sensors.

For more information, images and product demos, please visit www.Jawbone.com/Press, or follow @Jawbone on Twitter.

The bigger news is that Dave DeWalt, the McAfee president who saw the company through its $7.7 billion acquisition by Intel last year, is departing, though he will remain on McAfee’s board.

It’s not the first time that DeWalt has taken a company into a large acquisition. In 2003, he was the CEO of Documentum, which was acquired by storage giant EMC. He’s also chairman of the board at Polycom and recently joined the board of Jive Software, the pre-IPO social enterprise concern where former McAfee director Tony Zingale is CEO.

Last month VentureBeat reported he was going to Palo Alto Networks, a security start-up backed by Greylock Partners, Sequoia Capital, Globespan Capital Partners and JAFCO Ventures.

DeCesare joined McAfee in 2007 and had run its global operations, including manufacturing, facilities, and worldwide sales. Gebhart joined McAfee in 1999. His most recent role was running the retail and direct web sales strategies for the consumer, mobile and small business units.

If social media today means sharing, what is media co-creation?

Really social media?

That’s the premise behind Collabracam, an app for Apple iOS that is attempting to offer a new way to create video collaboratively, in real time by using the iPhone as both the directing and recording platform.

To understand how Collabracam works, it’s useful to think of the traditional television production experience the app tries to recreate.

In a TV studio, a director stares at a bank of screens in one room, while talking through headsets to multiple camera operators in the studio. The director then gives orders to the camera operators, such as “pan right” or “zoom in,” and finally cuts between the various cameras.

Similarly, using Collabracam, up to five people sharing a WiFi connection can use their iPhones to become director and camera-persons for an instant video studio.

One iPhone in the group is designated “director” and the others are “cameras.” The cameras stream live video to the director, who makes the decisions about camera switching and shot selection.

The app then spits out a single movie file on the director’s iPhone with the cuts that were selected during filming.

The idea man behind Collabracam is Kyle Hilla, a designer based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He’s the sole employee of Apptopus Inc., the company that officially makes the app.

The inspiration for the app came from Hilla’s previous work at a community TV station.

“I was hauling around hundreds of feet of big, heavy cables,” he said. “I knew there had to be a better way.”

This kind of synchronous, multi-camera collaboration isn’t yet common in the app store.

But Hilla sees more on the horizon: “Bringing people together for social media creation is going to be the next big thing.”

And Hilla isn’t alone in his thinking.

Venture firms Sequoia Capital, Bain Capital and Silicon Valley Bank funded beleaguered app maker Color to the tune of $41 million, in an attempt to tackle similar questions.

And while Color has spent the last few months stabbing in the dark spaces of multi-user media and storytelling as well, Hilla explained that Collabracam is designed to be different.

“Collabracam is for deliberate creation — it’s not passive,” he said.

The team aspect of Collabracam’s user experience may hold part of the key to cracking the group-media creation nut.

But Collabracam has its barriers to adoption.

The app is useless without a group of users, of course. And users have to be able to think about recording video in parts and they have to work as a team.

Still, Hilla said some interesting use cases have popped up, giving some Brazilian videographers who used it as a pre-production tool to make a video storyboard before moving on to making the real thing with HD cameras as a good example.

That’s an outlying consumer audience, of course, but Hilla thinks it’s a good start — he chatted about this and more via Skype video from Michigan:

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20110616/iphone-video-app-collabracam-makes-a-case-for-co-creation/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20110426/gideon-yu-leaves-khosla-ventures-to-join-the-49ers/ http://allthingsd.com/20110426/gideon-yu-leaves-khosla-ventures-to-join-the-49ers/#comments Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:27:01 +0000 Liz Gannes http://networkeffect.allthingsd.com/?p=5947 Venture capitalist Gideon Yu is leaving Khosla Ventures and plans to join the front office of the San Francisco 49ers as its chief strategy officer, according to multiple sources.

Khosla Ventures confirmed Yu’s departure and said, “we wish him all the best.”

Yu joined Khosla Ventures in August 2009 and led the firm’s investments in Square and Hunch. Sources said Yu is likely to remain on the board of mobile payments company Square, but that his involvement with other portfolio companies like Meebo and Hunch has not yet been determined.

Yu has played many roles in Silicon Valley, including CFO of Facebook (he left in 2009 after fighting with Mark Zuckerberg), VC at Sequoia Capital, CFO at YouTube when it was sold to Google, and treasurer at Yahoo.

He is also a huge sports fan. Fellow Niners fans can hope Yu’s expertise in strategy trickles down to the offense.

Update: The 49ers have issued a press release:

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS HIRE GIDEON YU AS CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER
Former CFO of Facebook and YouTube Joins 49ers

The San Francisco 49ers today announced they have named Gideon Yu Chief Strategy Officer. Yu will be responsible for maximizing the team’s strategic and business prospects, as well as developing new businesses and revenue streams. He will work closely on the Santa Clara stadium project with 49ers Chief Financial Officer Larry MacNeil and Executive Vice President, Stadium Project Patty Inglis, to make sure the organization is ready for construction in 2013. Yu will also play a key leadership role in identifying and integrating new technology into the new stadium, and will focus on delivering the team’s goal to make it an environmentally sustainable building.

“Gideon’s tremendous wealth of experience will help us accomplish our goal of financing the stadium for construction starting in January 2013,” said 49ers President & CEO Jed York. “He will focus on developing an environmentally sustainable building that is also a showcase of innovation.”

“I am extremely excited about this new challenge with the San Francisco 49ers,” said Yu. “Having been privileged enough to work with so many successful organizations throughout my career, I look forward to contributing that experience to the 49ers business and stadium operations. Our goal will be to establish the 49ers among the most technologically advanced sports franchises in the world.”

Yu has had an extensive and successful career in finance, strategy and operations. Most notably, he was the Chief Financial Officer of both Facebook and YouTube, as well as the Senior Vice President & Treasurer of Yahoo!. He was most recently a General Partner at Khosla Ventures, where he led their investment in Square and was its first outside board member. He also previously worked at both Disney and Hilton. Yu earned his BS in Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management from Stanford and his MBA from Harvard.

Yu is active philanthropically, sitting on the boards of the UCSF Foundation, Tipping Point Community and BUILD.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20110426/gideon-yu-leaves-khosla-ventures-to-join-the-49ers/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20110413/social-enterprise-player-jive-to-acquire-startup-proximal-labs/ http://allthingsd.com/20110413/social-enterprise-player-jive-to-acquire-startup-proximal-labs/#comments Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:29:20 +0000 Arik Hesseldahl http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/?p=5012 Jive Software, probably the fastest-moving of the social enterprise software players, is at it again. Today it announced it has made an acquisition: Proximal Labs.

Proximal just barely got its public start in January, and specializes in combining expertise around “big data” to enterprise social networks. Its CEO is David Gutelius, who was chief scientist at an outfit called Social Kinetics which was acquired by RedBrick Health. He’s joining Jive as its new chief social scientist.

Financial terms of the deal aren’t being disclosed, and its hard to make a guess at its valuation because it hasn’t disclosed any of its funding. Proximal specializes in building software that anticipates your needs. It builds what it calls “smart apps” that plug into a social media platform and learn about the user over time so that it can make recommendations based on the context of the situation at hand. Proximal has also done some fundamental work in applying machine learning, information retrieval and social analytics with an eye toward making social networks–in this case the ones that you’ll use in the office–more useful.

Gutelius told me that the company started working with Proximal in the fall–back when Proximal was still in stealth mode. “The idea was that we would hook our engine up to the Jive platform and create this brand new capability, to bridge the gap between internal collaborative communities and the social Web,” he said. The relationship grew, and earlier this year it was clear to all concerned that they fit together.

The plan at Jive is to use Proximal’s technology to extract useful intelligence out of social information into how employees, customers and partners interact, and to boost the analytics capability of the Jive platform to provide rich data on who’s an expert on what, and what they do. “We believe that the future of work is personalized,” Brian Roddy, Jive’s senior VP for engineering told me. “There’s a lot of noise in the discussion, so the point is to filter it down to a point where it’s not only manageable, but targeted at the work that people are doing.”

Jive has about 3,000 corporate customers including Cisco Systems, Nike, VMWare, Intel and Yum Brands, totaling about 15 million end users. Last year it landed a big $30 million investment from Kleiner Perkins who joined its other investor Sequoia Capital, which invested $15 million in 2007. And last year it brought on Tony Zingale, a veteran of Mercury Interactive, as its CEO.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20110413/social-enterprise-player-jive-to-acquire-startup-proximal-labs/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20110412/sweeet-sugar-gets-15-million-in-new-funding-from-ivp-ans-sequoia/ http://allthingsd.com/20110412/sweeet-sugar-gets-15-million-in-new-funding-from-ivp-ans-sequoia/#comments Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:00:42 +0000 Kara Swisher http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=42561

Sassy women-focused content site, Sugar Inc., has raised another $15 million in late-stage venture funding from new investor Institutional Venture Partners, as well as its original one, Sequoia Capital.

The San Francisco-based site, which has now raised a total of $46 million, said it would “use the funds for brand extensions, acquisitions, and international growth…”

Sugar, which runs the flagship PopSugar.com site, is in a media space that is both competitive and fast-growing.

Several bigger sites, such as Yahoo, have been interested in acquiring it, but its husband-and-wife co-founders Brian and Lisa Sugar have wanted to remain independent.

In 2009, the company broke off ties with NBC Universal by buying back its shares and got a Series C funding of $16 million from Sequoia.

Sequoia was an earlier venture investor, having put $5 million into the start-up in late 2006.

NBC invested $10 million in 2007. The media giant had been selling online advertising for the site, an arrangement that had previously ended.

Onward and upward, apparently!

Here’s the official press release:

Sugar Inc. Closes Investment from Institutional Venture Partners and Sequoia Capital

San Francisco, CA, April 13, 2011–Sugar Inc., a fast-growing global media company for women, announced today that it has completed a $15 million later-stage round of financing led by Institutional Venture Partners (IVP), one of the premier later-stage venture capital and growth equity firms. The Company’s original and consistent partner Sequoia Capital also participated in the round.

Sugar intends to use the funds for brand extensions, acquisitions, and international growth in pursuit of its goal of becoming the world’s largest media company focusing exclusively on women’s lifestyle. This round brings Sugar’s total funding to $46 million.

Sugar is the online leader in original content, social media, and commerce targeting trendsetting women, with a global audience of more than 20 million. The company has two business segments focusing on original content and commerce with a portfolio of brands including PopSugar.com, ShopStyle.com, PopSugarCity.com, and Fashionologie.com. Sugar has 190 employees and operations in the U.S., Europe, Japan, and Australia.

“On the eve of our five-year anniversary, Lisa and I are proud of the success and rapid growth we have demonstrated to date,” said Brian Sugar, founder and CEO of Sugar. “In the last year we achieved significant milestones, including growing our audience to over 20 million unique visitors per month, driving over $250 million in commerce to our partners, and reaching profitability for the full year. We are excited with the opportunities ahead of us as we continue to pioneer the combination of content and commerce.”

“Sugar is led by an outstanding management team that has driven impressive growth in a diverse set of complementary revenue streams,” said Dennis Phelps, General Partner of IVP. “We see an enormous market opportunity and are excited about Sugar’s ability to execute in a world of slower-moving incumbents.”

“Brian and Lisa Sugar are entertaining a new generation of women. They do so around the clock and on hundreds of millions of mobile and web devices. But Sugar Inc. is still at the beginning of what is possible,” said Michael Moritz, General Partner of Sequoia.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20110412/sweeet-sugar-gets-15-million-in-new-funding-from-ivp-ans-sequoia/feed/ 1 http://allthingsd.com/20110411/vc-fundraising-has-best-start-since-2001/ http://allthingsd.com/20110411/vc-fundraising-has-best-start-since-2001/#comments Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:30:21 +0000 Alistair Barr http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=38767 The U.S. venture-capital industry had its best fund-raising start since 2001 as three firms dominated, Thomson Reuters and the National Venture Capital Association said Monday.

Thirty-six U.S. venture-capital funds raised more than $7 billion in the first quarter of 2011. That’s up 76 percent, by dollar commitments, compared with the first quarter of 2010, which saw 44 funds raise $4 billion, according to Thomson Reuters and the NVCA.

Bessemer Venture Partners VIII raised $1.6 billion during the quarter, while Sequoia Capital 2010 raised $1.3 billion and J.P. Morgan’s (JPM 46.97, +0.13, +0.28%) Digital Growth Fund raised $1.2 billion.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20110411/vc-fundraising-has-best-start-since-2001/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20110408/feds-watchful-eye-over-google-in-travel-search-makes-critics-very-happy/ http://allthingsd.com/20110408/feds-watchful-eye-over-google-in-travel-search-makes-critics-very-happy/#comments Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:15:34 +0000 Tricia Duryee http://emoney.allthingsd.com/?p=4320 Time for a vacation!

After roughly nine months of antitrust scrutiny, the justice department has approved Google’s acquisition of ITA, acting quickly before the government faces a potentially shutdown due to budget disputes. And, not surprisingly, all parties involved are claiming victory.

Google announced an agreement to acquire ITA Software, a Cambridge, Massachusetts flight information software company, for $700 million in July 2010.

The acquisition was immediately identified as a threat to companies, such as Kayak and Orbitz, which rely on ITA’s data. Likewise, the federal regulators took the opportunity to take a close look at the deal’s ability to fuel Google’s continuing search dominance. However, the deal was largely expected to be rubber stamped because it represented a vertical expansion for Google, and not a gain in general market share.

The concessions laid out by the Department of Justice today has calmed the nerves of the deal’s harshest critics.

“This is a clear win from our perspective,” said Tom Barnett, counsel to Expedia, and former head of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Justice Department during a call organized by FairSearch.org, an advocacy group that opposed the acquisition. “We are very happy about that, but we are also aware of the fact that this is one transaction in one section of the Internet. We do think that it’s important that people bare that in mind and remain vigilant.”

The two biggest concerns by ITA’s customers was that the company’s data would remain available to them and that Google would not have access to their proprietary data.

Under the terms of the agreement, the department will require Google to establish internal firewall procedures to ensure competitors’ intellectual property and that ITA’s customers will be able to extend their contracts into 2016. New customers are also ensured that they will be able to license ITA’s software on “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms” into 2016. What’s more, the proposed settlement provides for a formal reporting mechanism for complainants if Google acts in an unfair manner.

On the same call, Kayak’s Chief Marketing Officer Robert Birge, said that Google’s likely happy with the terms because it got what it ultimately wanted — to acquire ITA. But that doesn’t mean that the terms weren’t vigilant enough to make customers of ITA happy, too.

“Their deal got cleared, so of course they are going to spin it how they like, but the Justice department has taken action to ensure competition. We are still looking at the specific details, but from a cursory look, it’s clear they protected our access and have protected our own proprietary technology that we’ve developed over the past seven years. It’s unambiguous to us that this is pleasing to us.”

We’re sure the deal’s closure after nine months also is pleasing to ITA’s investor list.

As soon as the court accepts the Justice Department’s proposal, you can imagine the $700 millions being distributed to all parties involved. In 2006, ITA closed $100 million in equity investment. Its investor list includes: Sequoia Capital, Battery Ventures, General Catalyst Partners, PAR Investment Partners and Spectrum Equity Investors.

In a short statement by Google, Jeff Huber, Google’s SVP of Commerce and Local, was enthusiastic about the Justice Department’s actions: “We’re moving to close this acquisition as soon as possible, and then we’ll start the important work of bringing our teams and products together. We’re confident that by combining ITA’s expertise with Google’s technology we’ll be able to develop exciting new flight search tools for all our users. Up, up and away!”

This doesn’t mean that Google is entirely in the clear.

As Digital Daily’s John Paczkowski wrote earlier this week, Larry Page has a lot to look forward to as his tenure as CEO, such as a European probe of the company’s search and advertising operations, a Texas investigation into allegations of “manual overriding or altering of” search result rankings, and perhaps that long-in-the-works Federal Trade Commission probe.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20110408/feds-watchful-eye-over-google-in-travel-search-makes-critics-very-happy/feed/ 2