<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; spinoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/spinoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Samsung Spins Off LCD Business</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120221/samsung-spins-off-lcd-business/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120221/samsung-spins-off-lcd-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lauren Goode</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid crystal display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Display Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TVs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=176337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung, currently the biggest LCD panel maker in terms of sales, will spin off its unprofitable LCD operations on April 1 into a new firm, called Samsung Display Co. As The Wall Street Journal notes, analysts had widely expected the spinoff, as the LCD industry shrinks and the Korean electronics giant focuses more on higher-margin OLED screens for TV sets and tablets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung, currently the biggest LCD panel maker in terms of sales, will spin off its unprofitable LCD operations on April 1 into a new firm, called Samsung Display Co. As The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204909104577234440318716700.html">notes</a>, analysts had widely expected the spinoff, as the LCD industry shrinks and the Korean electronics giant focuses more on higher-margin OLED screens for TV sets and tablets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120221/samsung-spins-off-lcd-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As U.S.-Listed China Internet Stocks Dive, Renren CEO Smacks Alibaba on the Way Down (And Gets Smacked Back)</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111002/as-u-s-listed-china-internet-stocks-dive-renren-ceo-smacks-alibaba-on-the-way-down-and-gets-smacked-back/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111002/as-u-s-listed-china-internet-stocks-dive-renren-ceo-smacks-alibaba-on-the-way-down-and-gets-smacked-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alibaba Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alipay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DST Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Ma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Chen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=127296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Chinese Internet exec Joe Chen of Renren snipes at a competitor there, there's a bigger problem for that country's Web companies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111002/as-u-s-listed-china-internet-stocks-dive-renren-ceo-smacks-alibaba-on-the-way-down-and-gets-smacked-back/renren/" rel="attachment wp-att-127298"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/10/renren.png" alt="" title="renren" width="192" height="192" class="alignright size-full wp-image-127298" /></a></p>
<p>While they are usually much less voluble than the chatty Web execs of Silicon Valley, the execs who run China&#8217;s fast-growing Internet companies seem to be keeping up just fine of late.</p>
<p>On Friday, for example, the Alibaba Group&#8217;s Jack Ma was positively effusive about <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110930/jack-ma-at-stanford-we-are-very-interested-in-buying-yahoo/">wanting to buy all of Yahoo</a>, a company which actually owns 40 percent of Alibaba. &#8220;We are very, very interested,&#8221; said Ma at an event at Stanford University.</p>
<p>Now, in an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-30/renren-s-chen-says-ma-alipay-spin-shook-confidence-in-chinese-companies.html">interview with Bloomberg</a>, Renren CEO Joe Chen decided to take a smack at Ma over his <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110729/liveblogging-the-yahoo-alibaba-settlement-call-everybody-breathe/">disputed spinoff of its Alipay payments unit</a>, which caused a high-profile ruckus with Yahoo earlier this year.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s quite unfortunate,&#8221; Chen said to Bloomberg about disagreement, which has since been settled. &#8220;It caused a lot of uncertainty about Chinese Internet companies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Them&#8217;s fightin&#8217; words, and a source close to Alibaba reacted with, <em>well</em>, reaction.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yeah, it shook confidence so badly that Silver Lake and DST [Global] just decided to put in billions to back Jack Ma,&#8221; referring to a <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110922/exclusive-dst-silver-lake-and-yunfeng-to-lead-1-6b-tender-offer-aimed-at-alibaba-employees-and-others/">recent funding deal</a> by the large investors. &#8220;People shouldn&#8217;t try to blame their own lack of performance on others.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Ouch!</em></p>
<p>Actually, Renren has bigger problems than Alibaba.</p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204138204576602330944302732.html#ixzz1Zdat3rAR ">substantive report in The Wall Street Journal</a> yesterday, what&#8217;s really hurting Chinese Internet companies is the declining stocks caused by recent accounting scandals there, which may have attracted scrutiny from U.S. regulators.</p>
<p>Wrote the Journal: &#8220;A series of alleged accounting frauds this year at little-known Chinese companies listed in the U.S. has triggered a sharp shift in sentiment among investors, who are now worried about hidden business risks or financial problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hence possible investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission that will surely drag Chinese stocks on U.S. exchanges down more.</p>
<p>And indeed, the stock of Renren &#8212; which had its own controversial issue with accurate data reporting at the time of the IPO of the social networking site earlier this year &#8212; declined 13 percent Friday, along with other Chinese companies listed here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111002/as-u-s-listed-china-internet-stocks-dive-renren-ceo-smacks-alibaba-on-the-way-down-and-gets-smacked-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Preps for Investor Day Tomorrow, While Investors Prep for a Yahoo Grilling</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110524/yahoo-preps-for-investor-day-tomorrow-while-investors-prep-for-a-yahoo-grilling/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110524/yahoo-preps-for-investor-day-tomorrow-while-investors-prep-for-a-yahoo-grilling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alibaba Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alipay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Irving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Bartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairmont Hotel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flipboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livestand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Levinsohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SoftBank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=76947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time for Yahoo's annual meeting with its investors tomorrow. On the menu: Not-so-tasty Chinese issues, with a side of stock decline.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110524/yahoo-preps-for-investor-day-tomorrow-while-investors-prep-for-a-yahoo-grilling/imgres-5/" rel="attachment wp-att-77295"><img src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/05/imgres4.jpeg" alt="" title="imgres" width="259" height="194" class="alignright size-full wp-image-77295" /></a></p>
<p>The execs at Yahoo were huddled yesterday and also today, getting ready for its investor day tomorrow morning.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably a good idea, especially since the Silicon Valley Internet giant has to come up with a good answer to how it is settling the recent kerfuffle with Chinese partner <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110515/alibaba-and-yahoo-why-cant-we-all-just-get-along/">Alibaba Group</a>. </p>
<p>A settlement announcement over the spinoff of Alibaba&#8217;s Alipay payments unit would be the best thing Yahoo could deliver by tomorrow, of course.</p>
<p>All parties&#8211;Alibaba, Yahoo and Japan&#8217;s SoftBank&#8211;I spoke to said a resolution was still being worked on, but one assumes reaching one sooner than later would be a big coup for Yahoo.</p>
<p>Barring that, China will surely be Question No. 1&#8211;and likely Nos. 2 through 23&#8211;from about 200 Wall Street analysts and big shareholders gathered from 8 am to 2 pm at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose to hear about how Yahoo is doing in 2011.</p>
<p>Given that the China problem has kept Yahoo stock stuck in the $16 doldrums for weeks now, after it had seen some progress before that, Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz and the passel of top execs presenting&#8211;Ross Levinsohn, Blake Irving and Tim Morse, among others&#8211;will have to scratch that itchy itch first before moving on to other questions.</p>
<p>In the interests of making the day interesting&#8211;and because press is not invited&#8211;I am here to help those investors without a clue of what to ask.</p>
<p>Thus, my list, in no particular order:</p>
<p>* Now that a newish management structure is in place, what is the big vision for Yahoo going forward?</p>
<p>* Please explain in detail the issues raised in the recent earnings call with the search and online advertising partnership with Microsoft, and should the deal be re-negotiated?</p>
<p>* Do you need to make more cuts in staff&#8211;which seems to have creeped back up in size?</p>
<p>* Why is Yahoo still in search in such a significant and expensive way, especially since market share is declining?</p>
<p>* How is the display market faring and how does Yahoo plan to innovate its flagship advertising business?</p>
<p>* Engagement is a key metric these days, so how is Yahoo going to improve its customer relationships, besides saying it will?</p>
<p>* What new and innovative products are in the pipeline&#8211;and you may not trot out Livestand for the umpteenth time as an example, unless you want me to start calling it Not-Flipboard&#8211;and when will they launch?</p>
<p>* Has Yahoo considered other ownership options that would better reward long-suffering shareholders?</p>
<p>* And, oh yes, China. Let&#8217;s not forget about China.</p>
<p>(Although media is not invited to the investor confab, I will be covering it via a live stream Yahoo is offering&#8211;you didn&#8217;t think I would miss it?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110524/yahoo-preps-for-investor-day-tomorrow-while-investors-prep-for-a-yahoo-grilling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doink Doink! "Law &amp; Order" Case Gets Closed.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100513/doink-doink-law-orders-case-gets-closed/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100513/doink-doink-law-orders-case-gets-closed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI: Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Caruso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=19463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC is dropping "Law &#38; Order" after 20 seasons. Here are the two things you'll always remember about the show: Its signature sound effect and its signature actor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC is killing off &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8221; after 20 seasons, according to <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2010/05/nbc-to-cancel-law-order/">reports</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/13936414695">popping up</a> this afternoon.</p>
<p>YouTube is surprisingly low on compelling L&amp;O clips&#8211;nothing like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sarYH0z948">David Caruso tributes</a> that CBS&#8217;s (CBS) &#8220;CSI: Miami&#8221; inspired. But here are the two things you&#8217;ll always remember about NBC&#8217;s stalwart show: Its signature sound effect and its signature actor:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="280" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1OlCVNn9ZeY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="280" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1OlCVNn9ZeY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="350" height="210" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oyaXVd0mtTM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="350" height="210" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oyaXVd0mtTM&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The network will still be running some &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8221; spinoffs, though. NBC will release its fall programming slate on Monday morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100513/doink-doink-law-orders-case-gets-closed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: News Corp. Digital Media Group Contemplates Spinoff and Equity Sale of FAN</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100419/exclusive-news-corp-digital-media-group-contemplates-spin-off-and-equity-sale-of-fan/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100419/exclusive-news-corp-digital-media-group-contemplates-spin-off-and-equity-sale-of-fan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Bain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoubleClick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Audience Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Lake Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=26981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While there have been reports that News Corp. is selling off its advertising unit, Fox Audience Network, the company has actually been in talks with a variety of private equity firms about spinning it off and selling only a 20 to 30 percent chunk of it.

Such a deal might not happen, of course, but the strategy behind this approach is related to a desire to create a strong consortium of advertising networks to fight the growing power of Google in the race to match display ad buyers with display ad sellers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2010/04/fan-275x70.jpg" alt="" title="fan" width="275" height="70" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-27049" /></p>
<p>While there have been reports that News Corp. is selling off its advertising unit, Fox Audience Network, the company has actually been in talks with a variety of private equity firms about spinning it off and selling only a 20 to 30 percent chunk of it.</p>
<p>Such a deal might not happen, of course, but the strategy behind this approach is related to a desire to create a strong consortium of advertising networks to fight the growing power of Google in the race to match display ad buyers with display ad sellers.</p>
<p>The worry: If Google (GOOG) dominates that business in the same way it dominates search, it&#8217;s game over.</p>
<p>The strategy is being spearheaded by News Corp. (NWS) digital head Jon Miller, who has played a role in a variety of moves by the media giant to thwart Google in the content space.</p>
<p>Also involved is Adam Bain, who runs FAN and who would be CEO of the potentially independent unit. The well-regarded exec has been of interest to a number of other companies of late, so a new company might also be a way to keep him in place.</p>
<p>Sources said Miller began to get some incoming investor interest in buying FAN, which has morphed into the current talks.</p>
<p>FAN sells ads for MySpace and other News Corp. sites, as well as some third-party partners. It is in the Top 10 of ad networks, with 147.6 million unique monthly visitors.</p>
<p>Under one possible scenario, which values <a href="https://www.foxaudiencenetwork.com/">FAN</a> at about $150 million, a private-equity player&#8211;such as Silver Lake Partners&#8211;would own a piece but also guarantee a certain amount of additional funding to spur growth.</p>
<p>The goal here is to take on Google and its ad-buying power either by rolling up ad networks or exchanges or by &#8220;federating&#8221; them&#8211;pulling them into an alliance.</p>
<p>Critically important to such an ambitious plan by News Corp. is cooperation from at least one of the trio of big of ad networks at Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo (YHOO) and AOL (AOL).</p>
<p>In addition, other ad networks could be part of the group, such as OpenX, which is strong in Europe. Interestingly, Miller is the chairman of Los Angeles-based OpenX.</p>
<p>There is, of course, a mass of onerous logistical issues with such a scheme, including a variety of technical differences among ad exchanges and the need for cooperation among many different companies.</p>
<p>&#8220;We would not want this to be ad confederation light,&#8221; said a source at one major player in the space. &#8220;Because then it&#8217;s worse than working alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition, not everyone is worried about Google&#8211;despite its acquisition of DoubleClick&#8211;taking over the display network space as easily as it took over the search market. Currently, while AOL has the top spot, there is no dominant player akin to Google&#8217;s overwhelming position in the search market.</p>
<p>News Corp. declined to comment about its plans for FAN.</p>
<p>(Full disclosure: News Corp. owns Dow Jones, which owns this Web site.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100419/exclusive-news-corp-digital-media-group-contemplates-spin-off-and-equity-sale-of-fan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Layoffs at RealNetworks</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100401/more-layoffs-at-realnetworks/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100401/more-layoffs-at-realnetworks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealNetworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhapsody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work force]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=37921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Simplify, restructure and grow." That’s the new internal mantra inside RealNetworks and the one under which the company continues to cut jobs. On Thursday, Real said it would sack another four percent of its work force, about 60 employees.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/LAYOFFS_BOBS_THUMB1.jpg" alt="LAYOFFS_BOBS_THUMB" title="LAYOFFS_BOBS_THUMB" width="150" height="109" class="alignright size-full wp-image-28332" /><br />
&#8220;Simplify, restructure and grow.&#8221; That’s the new internal mantra inside RealNetworks (RNWK) and the one under which the company continues to cut jobs. On Thursday, Real said it would <a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/03/realnetworks_cuts_60_more_jobs.html">sack another four percent of its workforce</a>, about 60 employees, as it prepares for the spinoff of its Rhapsody subscription music service and perhaps later, its games business as well. </p>
<p>Yesterday’s cuts follow a <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091105/realnetworks-to-lay-off-four-percent-of-staff-today/">similarly sized action last November</a> and a <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081204/realnetworks-cuts-130-75-of-workforce/">larger round of layoffs in December 2008</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100401/more-layoffs-at-realnetworks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweet the People: Twitter VC Wilson and Federal CTO Chopra Talk Policy in D.C.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100317/tweet-the-people-twitter-vc-wilson-and-federal-cto-chopra-talk-policy-in-d-c/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100317/tweet-the-people-twitter-vc-wilson-and-federal-cto-chopra-talk-policy-in-d-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aneesh Chopra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geo-location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gowalla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jet pack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Silva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadband Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Policy Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Square Ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verisign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wonkish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=25689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ms. BoomTown went to Washington, D.C., this week to moderate a panel that looked at the future of the digital arena for an event marking the 25th anniversary of the .com domain.

Surprisingly, the panelists did not talk about geo-location jet packs and augmented reality for everyone.

Instead, due to their proximity to pols and government bureaucrats, they went wonkish.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2010/03/mr-smith-goes-to-washington-275x208.jpg" alt="" title="mr-smith-goes-to-washington" width="275" height="208" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-25690" /></p>
<p>Ms. BoomTown went to Washington, D.C., this week to moderate a panel on the future of the digital arena for an event marking the <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100315/boomtown-in-d-c-to-say-happy-25th-birthday-to-com-and-hello-to-broadband-plan/">25th anniversary of the first .com domain</a>.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the panelists&#8211;Union Square Ventures partner Fred Wilson, Federal CTO Aneesh Chopra, Huffington Post founder Arianna Huffington and VeriSign (VRSN) CTO Ken Silva&#8211;did not talk about geo-location jet packs and augmented reality for everyone.</p>
<p>Instead, due to their proximity to pols and government bureaucrats, they went wonkish, talking a lot about open government, data-retention regulations and, in Wilson&#8217;s case, pondering the &#8220;privacy heist&#8221; of consumer information by Silicon Valley social networking hotshot Facebook.</p>
<p>Now, to be fair, Wilson is a big and early investor in rival Twitter, so he might have his bias.</p>
<p>But the conversation was a refreshing change from pointless discussions on location wars between Foursquare and Gowalla and <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100317/the-myspace-sale-or-spin-off-may-be-a-non-story-but-my-barry-manilow-badge-is-sure-for-real/">reporting-free speculation about whether MySpace</a> is or is not for sale or will spin off or not.</p>
<p>In fact, it was almost erudite, except for the part about how the Federal Communications Commission gave me a giant paper-filled binder of the National Broadband Plan (more on <em>that</em> classic D.C. tree-killing move later!).</p>
<p>So that you too can get all federal, here&#8217;s a video I did with Wilson and Chopra, in which they talk tech policy:</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=356F91E0-191C-410A-9460-6BDCB0D3BAC7&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={356F91E0-191C-410A-9460-6BDCB0D3BAC7}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100317/tweet-the-people-twitter-vc-wilson-and-federal-cto-chopra-talk-policy-in-d-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Spinoff Done. Now, What Have You Done for Me Lately, Tim Armstrong? (Though Woz Loves You!)</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091210/aol-spinoff-done-now-what-have-you-done-for-me-lately-tim-armstrong/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091210/aol-spinoff-done-now-what-have-you-done-for-me-lately-tim-armstrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=21795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL CEO Tim Armstrong got right into it after the Internet giant spun off from its parent company, Time Warner, today.

In what were very short remarks to the press in a conference call, Armstrong went into a very short history of AOL, which is an astonishing 25 years old this year.

AOL brought more people online at the dawn of the consumer Internet, noted Armstrong correctly. Whether the company will play such a significant role going forward is, of course, the big question.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/6a00d8341c5ffc53ef01116899a053970c-800wi.jpg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/6a00d8341c5ffc53ef01116899a053970c-800wi-214x300.jpg" alt="6a00d8341c5ffc53ef01116899a053970c-800wi" title="6a00d8341c5ffc53ef01116899a053970c-800wi" width="214" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-21800" /></a></p>
<p>AOL CEO Tim Armstrong got right into it after the Internet giant spun off from its parent company, Time Warner (TWX), today.</p>
<p>In what were very short remarks to the press in a conference call, Armstrong went into a very short history of AOL (AOL), which is an astonishing 25 years old this year.</p>
<p>AOL brought more people online at the dawn of the consumer Internet, noted Armstrong correctly. Whether it will play such a significant role going forward is, of course, the big question.</p>
<p>&#8220;AOL today looks like a very scaled network,&#8221; said Armstrong, before opening up the call to a few questions about AOL, which is once again an independent company.</p>
<p>The first question was, appropriately, about the stock, which was trading slightly down&#8211;about 1.2 percent&#8211;at $23.38, during the call.</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you disappointed?&#8221; asked a reporter from Germany.</p>
<p>&#8220;The stock may go up and down, but we continue to progress,&#8221; said Armstrong, who noted that what matters is what happens after <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091210/will-wall-street-heart-aol-today-even-if-it-partied-hearty-at-the-nyse-last-night/">all the partying was done</a> and he and his staff get back to work this afternoon.</p>
<p>There was also a question about competitors, with Armstrong mentioning both Yahoo (YHOO) and Demand Media, a privately held start-up.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe we have a much more scaled [content] engine [than Yahoo],&#8221; noted Armstrong. &#8220;Demand is an innovative and interesting company, so that is not a comparison we don&#8217;t like.&#8221;</p>
<p>There were questions about premium advertising and access, but the Q&#038;A was short, which was also appropriate.</p>
<p>After all, for AOL, now on its own, it is finally time to get down to business.</p>
<p>And, as a final bonus, here are some more interviews BoomTown did last night at the AOL party on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.</p>
<p>They include a spate of AOL execs, as well as board members&#8211;Hollywood dude Jim Wiatt and Gilt Groupe CEO Susan Lyne.</p>
<p>And, inexplicably, always ebullient Apple (AAPL) co-founder Steve Wozniak, who wants to sell Armstrong some technology for AOL.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the video:</p>
<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=6C8E577E-B0DF-4383-8C5A-1E77934FE460&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={6C8E577E-B0DF-4383-8C5A-1E77934FE460}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091210/aol-spinoff-done-now-what-have-you-done-for-me-lately-tim-armstrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Update 11.21.09&#8211;The House of Cards Edition</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091121/weekend-update-11-21-09-the-house-of-cards-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091121/weekend-update-11-21-09-the-house-of-cards-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Drake Martinet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aol Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Bartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrosme Chrome OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over the air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiem Capsule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weekend Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=29578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In tough economic times like these, even the biggest businesses get the urge to restructure, reorg and reshuffle. Kara reported on several big breakups (of the tech variety), including the separation of AOL from Time Warner. Even ICQ got into the mix.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/cards_image.jpg"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/cards_image-250x211.jpg" alt="cards_image" title="cards_image" width="250" height="211" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-29580" /></a>In tough economic times like these, even the biggest businesses get the urge to restructure, reorg and reshuffle. </p>
<p>Kara began Monday with some of the hard facts from the pending <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091116/aol-to-spin-off-december-9-begin-trading-december-10/">AOL-TimeWarner</a> (TWX) split. Stock issued for the post-spinoff AOL places the company’s total implied value at around $3 billion. Also on the list of stuff from 1994 being jettisoned from tech companies is <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091118/aol-hires-bankers-to-sell-off-icq-as-internet-service-starts-to-shed-non-core-assets/">the original instant messenger, ICQ</a>. Kara reported that AOL seeks to shed the brand in an effort to keep the larger ship afloat. Over at Yahoo (YHOO), Kara opened the lid on CEO Carol Bartz&#8217;s <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091118/yahoos-bartz-shuffles-the-exec-deck-filling-audience-and-other-top-slots-is-the-board-next-for-a-makeover/">shifting of top execs</a>. In Silicon Valley’s house of cards, everyone watches out for a shuffle.</p>
<p>Over at Digital Daily, John brought some hard numbers to the stresses being felt by AT&#038;T’s (T) 3G network thanks to a certain fruit-flavored smartphone. It seems that the iPhone is largely responsible for the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091117/thanks-iphone-2000-percent-increase-in-bay-area-data-traffic-since-2008-says-att/">2,000 percent increase in data traffic</a> in the San Francisco Bay Area compared with a year ago. (Weekend Update doesn’t claim sole responsibility.) Keeping up with layoff news these days is almost a full-time job. It’s a good thing Paczkowski is on the case. This week, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091118/sony-ericsson-to-sack-2000/">Sony-Ericsson let roughly 2,000 employees go</a>.  The firm plans to shutter whole offices in both the United States and abroad. John finished strong with a whole slew of posts about the forthcoming Google (GOOG) Chrome OS, which was <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20091119/chrome-the-end-of-desktop-apps/">released in a developer’s beta</a> this week. Next year, the good kids may be getting their stockings filled with Chrome rather than Apples.  </p>
<p>You can never tell what MediaMemo will have up its sleeve in a given week, and this one was no exception. Peter came in early with reports that <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091118/conde-nasts-offering-for-apples-mystery-tablet-wired-magazine/">Wired magazine is another publication betting on a certain tablet</a>. Wired may pave the way for other Condé Nast publication e-editions. From the department of &#8220;Hey, it looks like it worked for them,&#8221; a couple of music giants will <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091118/vevo-big-musics-hulu-launches-december-8/">release a Hulu-like service for music videos</a>. No word yet on whether the Internet killed the video star. Peter closed it out this week with the fizzle that will be Oprah’s broadcast career. The talk-show-host-turned-deity <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091120/why-broadcast-tv-wont-miss-oprah/">will end her broadcast career</a> in 2011, but may not be sorely missed by CBS, according to MediaMemo. Everyone is pretty torn up about Gail leaving though. </p>
<p>Personal Technology went a little off the reservation this week and covered an intriguing specialty gadget with a very specific target audience. The <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20091118/intel-makes-leap-in-device-to-aid-impaired-readers/">reading aid for the visually impaired</a> is unusual for many reasons, not the least of which is that its branded Intel (INTC) both on the inside and outside. The reader uses a downward-facing camera to read text and translate it directly to speech. Walt was pleased with the device on the whole, though he encountered some bugs and a somewhat steep learning curve that may be a function of the novel nature of the product. <a href="http://mailbox.allthingsd.com/20091118/mossbergs-mailbox-16/">Over at Mossberg&#8217;s Mailbox</a>, the lead question this week was about data loss. Once the geek shudders stopped, Walt let the reader know that there are many alternatives to Apple’s (AAPL) Time Capsule drives, and the integrated Time Machine option is one useful alternative. At Mossberg Solution, <a href="http://solution.allthingsd.com/20091117/palm-pixi-needs-a-dusting-of-speed/">Katie won a fight with a Pixi</a> and brought us the blow-by-blow account. The cheap-and-cheerful version of the Palm (PALM) Pre features a stripped-down price. That savings came at too high a performance cost, said Katie. She praised Palms webOS, but came down on the side of spending a little more to get the Pre.</p>
<p>Stay tuned and check back often. Weekend Update will be back next week as long as we can make it out for the Black Friday sales with all our fingers and toes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091121/weekend-update-11-21-09-the-house-of-cards-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL to Spin Off Dec. 9, Begin Trading Dec. 10 (Plus Full Press Release)</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091116/aol-to-spin-off-december-9-begin-trading-december-10/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091116/aol-to-spin-off-december-9-begin-trading-december-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL WI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Stock Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro rata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registration Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regular way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation and Distribution Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockhoder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ticker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 1.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[when issued]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=20661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL will officially be spun off from Time Warner on Dec. 9, with trading to begin the next day.

Shareholders of record at 5 pm ET on Nov. 27 will get one share of AOL for every 11 shares of Time Warner on the day of the long-expected spinoff of the Internet service.

AOL will trade on the New York Stock Exchange as "AOL," just like the old days. Unlike the old days: Time Warner has given the company an implied valuation of a little more than $3 billion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/aol-time-warner.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-20673" title="AOL splits from Time Warner" src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/aol-time-warner-250x178.jpg" alt="AOL splits from Time Warner" width="250" height="178" /></a></p>
<p>AOL will officially be spun off from Time Warner on Dec. 9, with trading to begin the next day.</p>
<p>Shareholders of record at 5 pm ET on Nov. 27 will get one share of AOL for every 11 shares of Time Warner (TWX) on the day of the long-expected spinoff of the Internet service.</p>
<p>At Time Warner&#8217;s current market cap of $38 billion, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-aol-spinoff-valuation-is-only-35-billion-2009-11">that gives AOL an implied value of $3.2 billion</a>&#8211;a fraction of Google&#8217;s (GOOG) $20 billion valuation of the portal in 2005, when it invested $1 billion in the property. And it&#8217;s even lower than the <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090122/google-aol-is-worth-55-billion/">$5.5 billion valuation Google gave the company last January,</a> when it wrote down its investment.</p>
<p>AOL will trade on the New York Stock Exchange as &#8220;AOL.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ironically, before it merged with Time Warner at the dawn of the new century, AOL previously traded on the NYSE.</p>
<p>AOL went public on Nasdaq on March 19, 1992, under the ticker &#8220;AMER,&#8221; and moved to the NYSE on Sept. 16, 1996 trading as &#8220;AOL.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Fun fact: BoomTown actually attended both the fancy dinner the night before AOL moved to the NYSE from Nasdaq and the AOL party on Wall Street the next day.)</p>
<p>If you want to get really technical, AOL common stock will begin trading on a “when-issued” basis&#8211;you really don&#8217;t want to know the confusing regulatory details of why&#8211;on the NYSE under the symbol &#8220;AOL WI&#8221; beginning on Nov. 24, 2009.</p>
<p>On Dec. 10, when-issued trading of AOL common stock will end and &#8220;regular-way&#8221; trading under the symbol &#8220;AOL&#8221; will begin.</p>
<p>After that, it will be up to CEO Tim Armstrong to make the long-suffering AOL into the little Internet company that could.</p>
<p>The separation of AOL and Time Warner is also symbolic, dismantling the most potent symbol of Web 1.0, when AOL essentially got control of the media giant, only to see the merger crash in disaster.</p>
<p>If at first you don&#8217;t succeed&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://ir.timewarner.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70972&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1355991&amp;highlight=">full Time Warner press release</a> on the transaction:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p><strong>Time Warner Declares Spin-off Dividend of AOL Shares</strong></p>
<p><strong>Record and Distribution Dates and Final Distribution Ratio Announced</strong></p>
<p>NEW YORK&#8211;(BUSINESS WIRE)&#8211;Nov. 16, 2009&#8211;Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX) and AOL Inc. today announced the timing and details regarding the spin-off of AOL from Time Warner.</p>
<p>The Time Warner board of directors has approved the final distribution ratio and declared a pro rata dividend of the shares of AOL common stock owned by Time Warner that will result in the complete legal and structural separation of the two companies.</p>
<p>On the distribution date of December 9, 2009, Time Warner stockholders of record as of 5 p.m. on November 27, 2009, the record date for the distribution, will receive one share of AOL common stock for every eleven shares of Time Warner common stock they hold.</p>
<p>Fractional shares of AOL common stock will not be distributed to Time Warner stockholders. Instead, the fractional shares of AOL common stock will be aggregated and sold in the open market, with the net proceeds distributed pro rata in the form of cash payments to Time Warner stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share of AOL common stock.</p>
<p>No action or payment is required by Time Warner stockholders to receive the shares of AOL common stock. Stockholders who hold Time Warner common stock on the record date will receive a book-entry account statement reflecting their ownership of AOL common stock or their brokerage account will be credited with the AOL shares. An Information Statement containing details regarding the distribution of the AOL common stock and AOL’s business and management following the AOL spin-off will be mailed to Time Warner stockholders prior to the distribution date.</p>
<p>The AOL spin-off has been structured to qualify as a tax-free dividend to Time Warner stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Cash received in lieu of fractional shares, however, will be taxable. Time Warner stockholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of the AOL spin-off.</p>
<p>Shares of Time Warner common stock will continue to trade “regular way” on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “TWX” through the distribution date of December 9, 2009, and thereafter. Any holders of shares of Time Warner common stock who sell Time Warner shares regular way on or before December 9, 2009, will also be selling their right to receive shares of AOL common stock. Investors are encouraged to consult with their financial advisers regarding the specific implications of buying or selling Time Warner common stock on or before the distribution date.</p>
<p>AOL common stock will begin trading on a “when-issued” basis on the NYSE under the symbol “AOL WI” beginning on November 24, 2009. On December 10, 2009, when-issued trading of AOL common stock will end and “regular-way” trading under the symbol “AOL” will begin. The CUSIP number for the AOL common stock will be 00184X 105 when regular-way trading begins.</p>
<p>Time Warner and AOL have entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement and several other agreements related to the AOL spin-off. The completion of the AOL spin-off is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the Registration Statement on Form 10 for the AOL common stock being declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the AOL common stock being authorized for listing on the NYSE and certain other conditions described in the Information Statement included in the Form 10 and in the agreements filed as exhibits to the Form 10. The condition relating to the authorization of the AOL common stock for listing on the NYSE has been satisfied, and today AOL sent a letter to the SEC requesting that the Form 10 be declared effective. Time Warner and AOL expect all other conditions to the AOL spin-off to be satisfied on or before the distribution date.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091116/aol-to-spin-off-december-9-begin-trading-december-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Makes AOL's Turnaround Task Even Harder</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091113/google-makes-aols-turnaround-task-even-harder/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091113/google-makes-aols-turnaround-task-even-harder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prospectus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Falco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search query volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscriber base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Little by little, AOL is offering investors more and more details about what the company will look like after it spins off from Time Warner. But the more AOL discloses, the less attractive the company looks. The newest problem: AOL's steady flow of Google money is going away.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/tim_armstrong_lg.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5186" title="tim_armstrong_lg" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/tim_armstrong_lg-300x195.jpg" alt="tim_armstrong_lg" width="250" height="162" /></a></p>
<p>Little by little, AOL is offering investors more and more details about what the company will look like after it spins off from Time Warner (TWX).</p>
<p>The problem: The more AOL discloses, the less attractive the company looks.</p>
<p>The most recent nuggets come from a preliminary prospectus Time Warner filed with the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1468516/000119312509231054/dex991.htm">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> yesterday. Some, but not all, of this has broken out in previous filings or earnings announcements. In any case, it helps to see it all in one place.</p>
<p>The big picture: AOL&#8217;s subscription service, which accounts for the &#8220;vast majority&#8221; of the company&#8217;s operating income, is withering away. But advertising revenue, which was supposed to replace that money, has been declining for nearly two years (see tables below; click to enlarge):</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/aol-revs-2004.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12955" title="aol revs 2004" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/aol-revs-2004.png" alt="aol revs 2004" width="350" height="63" /></a></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a closer look at the ad business and its recent performance:</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/aol-ad-revenue.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12957" title="aol ad revenue" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/aol-ad-revenue.png" alt="aol ad revenue" width="350" height="31" /></a></p>
<p>The good news for AOL is that some of this is the result of self-inflicted wounds, and it&#8217;s possible to heal some of them. The company&#8217;s previous regime seemed to go out of its way to mismanage and dismantle the sales force, for example, and if new CEO Tim Armstrong can rebuild that team, he can make a bit of headway.</p>
<p>The flip side is that some of AOL&#8217;s woes may be well beyond Armstrong&#8217;s control. Money from a Google (GOOG) search deal, which provided a third of AOL&#8217;s $2.1 billion in ad revenue last year&#8211;and had been increasing up until this year&#8211;is now dropping off, too.</p>
<p>Google dollars fell by $42 million in the most recent quarter, representing more than half the $75 million drop in ad dollars from its AOL Media unit. And Google income fell by $90 million in the last nine months, representing about 40 percent of $197 million decline in that period.</p>
<p>AOL says some of the Google decline stems from its declining subscriber base, which brought down search query volume. The rest is due to lower revenue per search query&#8211;that is, Google has changed its algorithm in way that ends up punishing AOL. But Armstrong can&#8217;t do a whole lot about either of these variables.</p>
<p>He <em>can</em> try extracting more money from Google, whose search deal expires at the end of next year, or from Microsoft (MSFT), which is trying to gain share any way it can.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090923/aol-readies-board-picks-for-spin-off-while-holding-off-search-suitors-plus-boomtown-director-picks/">Armstrong turned down a new deal from Google</a> and now says he&#8217;ll deal with search after he gets other things in place. But the longer he waits, the less leverage he may have.</p>
<p>AOL shareholders will be paying Armstrong well to figure this out, though. His three-year deal pays him a base of $1 million a year, plus annual cash bonuses of up to $4 million. In addition, he&#8217;s getting $20 million worth of stock grants to make up for Google shares he left on the table when he resigned from his old employer. And he&#8217;ll get stock options worth as much as 1.5 percent of the company once the spinoff is complete.</p>
<p>That said, AOL will also be paying former AOL CEO Randy Falco, who got tossed out in March. Falco will continue to pull down a $1 million salary through 2010&#8211;and he&#8217;ll get $7.5 million in bonuses through then as well. Former AOL COO Ron Grant, meanwhile, will earn $750,000 a year, plus another $3.3 million in bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091113/google-makes-aols-turnaround-task-even-harder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL's Mass Layoffs Will Cost $200 Million</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091112/aols-mass-layoffs-will-cost-200-million/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091112/aols-mass-layoffs-will-cost-200-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restructuring charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL formally acknowledged that it plans on a round of very large cuts: In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Time Warner unit said it plans on taking up to $200 million in restructuring charges through the first half of 2010. Earlier this week, Kara Swisher reported that AOL's coming spinoff would be followed by layoffs of up to 1,000 employees.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL formally acknowledged that it plans on a round of very large cuts: In a <a href="http://ir.timewarner.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70972&amp;p=irol-secText&amp;TEXT=aHR0cDovL2NjYm4uMTBrd2l6YXJkLmNvbS94bWwvZmlsaW5nLnhtbD9yZXBvPXRlbmsmaXBhZ2U9NjU5NzQwMCZkb2M9MQ%3d%3d">filing</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Time Warner (TWX) unit said it plans on taking up to $200 million in restructuring charges through the first half of 2010. Earlier this week, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091110/aol-small-layoff-today-a-voluntary-buyout-and-then-the-big-one/">Kara Swisher</a> reported that AOL&#8217;s coming spinoff would be followed by layoffs of up to 1,000 employees.</p>
<p>Some perspective: As I noted last week, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091104/time-warner-gives-wall-street-a-pleasant-surprise-but-has-bad-news-for-time-inc-employees/?mod=ATD_sphere">AOL has already spent $83 million on separate restructuring efforts</a> through the first nine months of this year. And parent company Time Warner has said it will spend $100 million on its restructuring/mass layoffs at its Time Inc. publishing unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091112/aols-mass-layoffs-will-cost-200-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet AOL's BOD: Tim Armstrong May Be Youthful, but His Directors-To-Be Aren't</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091026/meet-aols-bod-tim-armstrong-announces-directors-in-advance-of-spinoff/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091026/meet-aols-bod-tim-armstrong-announces-directors-in-advance-of-spinoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrivals departure feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automatic Data Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board of directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Reynolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hambrecth & Quist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Stengel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Wiatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Dykstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micahel Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paley Center for Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patricia Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plainfield Asset Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Providence Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Broadcasting Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dalzell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hambrecht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=12393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL continues to prep for its impending spinoff from Time Warner. Today's step: Announcing the board of directors for the company-to-be. Boldface names of note include William Hambrecht, former head of tech investment bank Hambrecht &#38; Quist; Michael Powell, former chairman of the Federal Communications Commission; and Jim Wiatt, former head of William Morris. Notably absent: Anyone from Google, Tim Armstrong's favorite recruiting ground, and any whippersnappers, unless you count 46-year-old Powell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/tim_armstrong_lg.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5186" title="tim_armstrong_lg" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/tim_armstrong_lg-300x195.jpg" alt="tim_armstrong_lg" width="250" height="162" /></a>AOL continues to prep for its impending spinoff from Time Warner. Today&#8217;s step: Announcing the board of directors for the company-to-be. Boldface names of note include William Hambrecht, former head of tech investment bank Hambrecht &amp; Quist; Michael Powell, former chairman of the Federal Communications Commission; and Jim Wiatt, former head of William Morris. Not included, unless I&#8217;m missing something: Anyone with a direct relationship to Google (GOOG), CEO Tim Armstrong&#8217;s favorite recruiting turf.</p>
<p>First impression: There is a lot of past tense in these bios. As in Richard Dalzell, who used to be chief information officer at Amazon (AMZN), and Fred Reynolds, who used to be chief financial officer at CBS (CBS). Etc.</p>
<p>My gut here is that Armstrong, or his employers at Time Warner (TWX), want to bump the age/gravitas quotient, since Armstrong and most of his lieutenants are whippersnappers under 40.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the abbreviated list of elder statesmen:</p>
<p><strong>Richard Dalzell</strong>: Amazon exec from 1997-2007</p>
<p><strong>Karen Dykstra</strong>: Partner at Plainfield Asset Management; former CFO of Automatic Data Processing</p>
<p><strong>Bill Hambrecht</strong>:  Founder, Hambrecht &amp; Quist; IPO&#8217;d Apple (AAPL), Amazon, Adobe (ADBE), etc.</p>
<p><strong>Patricia Mitchell</strong>: CEO of Paley Center for Media; former CEO of Public Broadcasting Service</p>
<p><strong>Michael Powell</strong>: <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/industry-moves-michael-powell-shifts-from-fcc-to-vc/">Providence Equity adviser</a>, former head of the FCC; also known to some as former Secretary of State Colin Powell&#8217;s son</p>
<p><strong>Fred Reynolds</strong>: 15-year veteran of CBS; retired this year</p>
<p><strong>Jim Stengel</strong>: 25-year veteran of Procter &amp; Gamble (PG), retired 2008; now runs consulting company</p>
<p><strong>Jim Wiatt</strong>: Ran William Morris agency until forced out this year; last seen <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090902/is-google-getting-a-hollywood-tour-guide-former-william-morris-boss-jim-wiatt-may-take-youtube-consulting-gig/">chatting up Google CEO Eric Schmidt about working with YouTube</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the press release. More in a bit:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>AOL NAMES ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS</p>
<p>New Board Establishes Strong Foundation in Leadership and Governance with Diverse Range of Talents from Internet, Media, Marketing, Entertainment and Finance</p>
<p>NEW YORK, NY &#8211; October 26, 2009  &#8211; AOL today named nine members to serve on its Board of Directors, drawing on leaders with expertise in Internet, Media, Entertainment and Marketing, as well as Finance. Among the directors named are: Richard Dalzell, Karen Dykstra, William Hambrecht, Patricia Mitchell, Michael Powell, Fredric Reynolds, James Stengel and Jim Wiatt. They will join the AOL Board when the separation from Time Warner is complete, with AOL CEO Tim Armstrong serving as Chairman of the Board.</p>
<p>“AOL is very fortunate to have an exceptional group of proven leaders to serve on our board of directors. AOL is on a mission to help create the future of media and content and the AOL Board will play a central part in helping us focus the strategy and also operate the company with the highest ethical standards,” said Armstrong. “These individuals bring independent judgment and a dedication to building shareholder value, and they will be a tremendous resource for our company, our employees, and our future.”</p>
<p>Board members named to date:</p>
<p>Richard L. Dalzell</p>
<p>Richard Dalzell was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Amazon.com, Inc., until 2007.  Previously, Dalzell served in numerous other positions at Amazon, including Senior Vice President of Worldwide Architecture and Platform Software and Chief Information Officer from 2001 to 2007, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 2000 to 2001 and Vice President and Chief Information Officer from 1997 to 2000. Prior to Amazon, Dalzell was Vice President of the Information Systems Division at Wal-Mart from 1994 to 1997. Dalzell holds a B.S. in engineering from the United States Military Academy, West Point.</p>
<p>Karen E. Dykstra</p>
<p>Karen Dykstra is a partner at Plainfield Asset Management LLC, and has been Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Plainfield Direct Inc. since 2006. Plainfield Asset Management LLC manages investment capital for institutions and high net worth individuals based in the United States and abroad. Plainfield Direct Inc. is a business development company managed by Plainfield Asset Management. Prior to joining Plainfield, Dykstra was the Chief Financial Officer of Automatic Data Processing, Inc., a provider of transaction processing and information-based business solutions, from 2003 to 2006. Dykstra serves on the boards of Plainfield Direct Inc., Gartner, Inc. and Crane Co. She received a B.S. in accounting from Rider University and a M.B.A. from Fairleigh Dickinson University.</p>
<p>William R. Hambrecht</p>
<p>Bill Hambrecht founded and has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WR Hambrecht + Co since 1998. WR Hambrecht + Co is a financial services firm specializing in Internet and auction processes and providing underwriting and advisory services for technology and emerging-growth companies. Before that, Hambrecht co-founded Hambrecht &amp; Quist. In 2007, Hambrecht co-founded the United Football League, which premiered in October 2009. Hambrecht has served as a director of numerous private and public companies and currently serves on the board of Motorola, Inc. He graduated from Princeton University.</p>
<p>Patricia E. Mitchell</p>
<p>Patricia Mitchell has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of The Paley Center for Media, a global non-profit cultural institution dedicated to the discussion of the cultural, creative and social significance of television, radio and emerging platforms, since 2006. The Center also convenes executives of global media companies on business issues and subjects of mutual interest, providing a neutral non-competitive forum. Before that, Mitchell was President and CEO of the Public Broadcasting Service from 2000 to 2006, where she oversaw the digital conversion of 359 public television stations and development of a system-wide digital content initiative. For more than two decades, she was an award-winning journalist and producer, serving as reporter, anchor, talk show host, producer and executive for three broadcast networks and several cable channels. She has served as President of Time Inc. Television and CNN Productions, and was a partner in an independent production company which focused on women’s programming. Mitchell serves on the board of Sun Microsystems, Inc. She holds a B.A. in English/drama and a M.A. in English literature from the University of Georgia.</p>
<p>Michael K. Powell</p>
<p>Michael Powell has served as a Senior Advisor to Providence Equity Partners, a private equity firm focused on media, entertainment, communications and information investments, since 2005. Powell is also Chairman of the MK Powell Group, which focuses on strategic advice in the areas of technology, media and communications. Previously, Powell served as Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission from 2001 to 2005. He also served as the Chief of Staff of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and was an associate with the law firm of O’Melveny &amp; Myers LLP. Powell serves on the boards of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Education Management Corporation. He was also named Chairman of NTT DoCoMo’s 5th U.S. Advisory Board. Powell has a B.A. in government from the College of William and Mary and a J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center.</p>
<p>Fredric G. Reynolds</p>
<p>Fredric Reynolds was with CBS Corporation and its predecessor companies from 1994 until he retired in August 2009. Reynolds was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CBS Corporation from 2005 to 2009. He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Viacom Television Stations Group of Viacom, Inc., and President of the CBS Television Stations Division of CBS, Inc. Before that, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Viacom, Inc., CBS Corporation and Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Reynolds joined Westinghouse from PepsiCo Inc. Reynolds serves on the board of Kraft Foods Inc. A certified public accountant, Reynolds holds a B.B.A. in finance from the University of Miami.</p>
<p>James R. Stengel</p>
<p>James Stengel has been President and Chief Executive Officer of The Jim Stengel Company, LLC, a think tank and consulting firm conducting proprietary research, generating thought leadership and applying a new framework to drive business growth, since 2008. Stengel is also currently an adjunct marketing professor at UCLA’s Anderson School of Management. Stengel worked at Procter &amp; Gamble from 1983 to 2008, holding a variety of positions including Global Marketing Officer from 2001 to 2008. Stengel serves on the board of Motorola, Inc. He holds a B.A. from Franklin &amp; Marshall College and a M.B.A. from Pennsylvania State University’s Smeal School of Business.</p>
<p>James A. Wiatt</p>
<p>Jim Wiatt has been an independent consultant since June 2009.  Wiatt served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the William Morris Agency from 1999 until 2009, overseeing all areas of the entertainment company, including motion picture, television, music, publishing, theater, digital, sports marketing, business development, investments and corporate consulting. Before joining WMA, Wiatt was Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of International Creative Management, a talent management company. A graduate of the University of Southern California, Wiatt is a member of the Board of Councilors of the USC School of Cinematic Arts, former Chairman and current member of the Board of the Los Angeles Police Foundation, and on the Board of Directors of the Music Center of Los Angeles.</p>
<p>On May 28, 2009, Time Warner Inc. announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to proceed with plans for the complete legal and structural separation of AOL from Time Warner. Following the proposed transaction, AOL would be an independent, publicly traded company. Time Warner has indicated that it aims to complete the proposed transaction around the end of this year.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091026/meet-aols-bod-tim-armstrong-announces-directors-in-advance-of-spinoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP to Merge PC and Printing Divisions?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090930/hp-to-merge-pc-and-printing-divisions/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090930/hp-to-merge-pc-and-printing-divisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLIQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Hurd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=25700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=B54735FC-B9E3-49CE-9863-1189D7C3390C&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={B54735FC-B9E3-49CE-9863-1189D7C3390C}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090930/hp-to-merge-pc-and-printing-divisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner's $4.2 Billion AOL Fire Sale</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090930/time-warners-4-2-billion-aol-fire-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090930/time-warners-4-2-billion-aol-fire-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imran Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pali Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Greenfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=11554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google marked down AOL's value from $20 billion to $5.5 billion earlier this year. That's still too high, argues a JP Morgan analyst.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/tim_armstrong_lg.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5186" title="tim_armstrong_lg" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/03/tim_armstrong_lg-300x195.jpg" alt="tim_armstrong_lg" width="250" height="162" /></a>When AOL CEO Tim Armstrong isn&#8217;t busy <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090929/aols-google-reunion-grows-yet-again-former-youtube-sales-guy-shashi-seth-joins-up/">hiring former Google executives</a>, he&#8217;s preparing for his company&#8217;s spinoff from the Time Warner (TWX) mother ship, which is is supposed to happen by the end of the year. So when it does, how much will the Internet company be worth? Try $4.2 billion, says JP Morgan analyst Imran Khan.</p>
<p>Khan&#8217;s estimate is the first one I&#8217;ve seen floated in public so far. The analyst has proven to have a <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090204/aols-old-news-last-quarter-was-as-bad-as-we-thought/">pretty good grip</a> on <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090107/did-aol-ad-dollars-drop-18-last-quarter/">AOL&#8217;s business</a> to date, so I&#8217;m taking it seriously.</p>
<p>But for the record, note that not only is the $4 billion number a pittance of the company&#8217;s value during the original Web boom (remember those days?), it&#8217;s also marked down from the $5.5 billion <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090122/google-aol-is-worth-55-billion/">Google assigned to the company when it wrote down its five percent stake</a> earlier this year. Which was, of course, a markdown from the $20 billion value Google (GOOG) had given it in 2005.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Pali Capital&#8217;s Rich Greenfield also pegs AOL at &#8220;around $4 billion.&#8221; Greenfield is also in the growing group of people who think Time Warner is likely to sell off its Time Inc. publishing unit. I think <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090928/time-warner-dumping-its-magazines-not-so-fast/">otherwise</a>, but this will be interesting to watch.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how Khan got to his number (click chart to enlarge).</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/aol-valuation.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11555" title="aol valuation" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/aol-valuation.png" alt="aol valuation" width="350" height="229" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090930/time-warners-4-2-billion-aol-fire-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner Dumping Its Magazines? Not So Fast.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090928/time-warner-dumping-its-magazines-not-so-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090928/time-warner-dumping-its-magazines-not-so-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Research Global Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bewkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Illustrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=11419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heavyweight media investor Gordy Crawford--who happens to own a big chunk of Time Warner--says the conglomerate plans to dump its magazine business. But I get the sense that Jeff Bewkes and company plan on keeping at least some of the unit's iconic titles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/time-titles.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-11430" title="time titles" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/time-titles-250x215.jpg" alt="time titles" width="250" height="215" /></a>Add another voice to the <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090602/time-warners-next-spin-off-time-inc/">chorus</a> <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_25/b4136071188223.htm">of</a> <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090515/yet-more-cost-cutting-coming-to-forbes/">people</a> who think Time Warner will get rid of its Time Inc. magazine group: Media investor Gordon Crawford is <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2009/09/big_time_warner.html">predicting</a> that CEO Jeff Bewkes will shed his conglomerate&#8217;s namesake publishing unit.</p>
<p>Crawford&#8217;s thinking: After Time Warner ditches AOL, which is scheduled for a spinoff later this year, the company will ditch its magazine business as well. That will leave it with a portfolio made up only of a movie studio and cable networks, and a big cash pile to play with.</p>
<p>Time Warner won&#8217;t comment, but I&#8217;m sure the company has heard Crawford make this prediction before. His Capital Research Global Investors owns more than eight percent of Time Warner shares, which means he gets plenty of access to Bewkes and his lieutenants.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing: The body language from Time Warner executives in recent months makes me think they intend to keep at least part of their magazine business in the family. More than body language, actually: &#8220;Time Warner without People? I can&#8217;t imagine it,&#8221; one well-placed Time Warner official told me recently.</p>
<p>That said, I won&#8217;t be surprised if the publisher employs fewer people, producing fewer magazines in the future.</p>
<p>Time Warner officials have repeatedly said that Time Inc. has too many titles: The magazine unit publishes 23 magazines in the U.S. How many can you name? And last year&#8217;s <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20081028/the-entire-time-inc-layoff-memo-from-ann-moore/">mass</a> <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081209/holiday-cheer-from-time-inc-layoffs-nearly-done/">layoffs</a>, while unprecedented for the publisher, were still fairly modest compared to other publishers&#8217; cuts. The six percent reduction left Time Inc. with some 9,400 people on the payroll.</p>
<p>But executives at the publisher love to stress, off the record, that its flagship titles&#8211;Time, People and Sports Illustrated&#8211;are each on track to generate millions of dollars of profit this year, even though ad pages and revenue are down. And while Time Inc. certainly hasn&#8217;t figured out its digital business yet, at least some of its print properties could and should do well on the Web, as <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20081210/more-not-bad-news-from-time-inc-peoplecom-booming/">People.com</a> is already doing.</p>
<p>There are certainly assets that Bewkes and company could dispose of fairly easily. For instance, its U.K.-based IPC Media unit, which handles many of the 90-plus titles it publishes outside the U.S., is frequently brought up as a sale candidate. But I&#8217;d be surprised if he got rid of Time Inc. and its iconic brands altogether.</p>
<p>For the record, here&#8217;s how Time Inc. performed in the first half of the year. The company has already said it expects similar numbers for the remainder of 2009 (click table below to enlarge).</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox" href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/time-inc-PL.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11429" title="time inc P&amp;L" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/time-inc-PL.png" alt="time inc P&amp;L" width="350" height="111" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090928/time-warner-dumping-its-magazines-not-so-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another AOL Org Chart Shuffle: COO Partoll, Search Boss Kannapell Out</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090915/another-aol-org-chart-shuffle-coo-partoll-search-boss-kannapell-out/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090915/another-aol-org-chart-shuffle-coo-partoll-search-boss-kannapell-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrivals departures feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Garlinghouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry moves feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Levick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kannapell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Partoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reorg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=11011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn't the long-rumored round of mass layoffs, but AOL boss Tim Armstrong did let go of two executives today: COO Kim Partoll is out, as is John Kannapell, SVP of search and local media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/kim-partoll.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-11015" title="kim partoll" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/kim-partoll.png" alt="kim partoll" width="115" height="146" /></a>This isn&#8217;t the long-rumored round of mass layoffs, but AOL boss Tim Armstrong did let go of two executives today: COO Kim Partoll is out, as is <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/kannapell">John Kannapell</a>, SVP of search and local media.</p>
<p>Armstrong, who took over the <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090312/aol-gets-a-new-ceo-google-sales-boss-tim-armstrong/">Time Warner</a> (TWX) unit earlier this year and is prepping it for a <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090429/time-warner-makes-it-official-aol-spinoff-is-coming/">spinoff</a> that&#8217;s supposed to happen by the end of 2009, doesn&#8217;t plan on replacing either executive, say people familiar with the matter. Instead, their work will be divvied up among other Armstrong lieutenants.</p>
<p>Partoll&#8217;s mobile responsibilities, for instance, will be given to new hire and former Yahoo (YHOO) exec <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090907/sticky-situation-of-the-month-ex-yahoo-communications-head-and-peanut-butter-manifesto-scribe-garlinghouse-to-helm-similar-unit-at-aol/">Brad Garlinghouse</a>, while Kannapell&#8217;s responsibilities will be handed to newish hire and former Google (GOOG) exec <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090429/exclusive-platform-a-head-coleman-out-at-aol-as-well-as-cfo-and-more-to-come/">Jeff Levick</a>. Armstrong himself will handle international duties, previously assigned to Partoll.</p>
<p>Kannapell&#8217;s departure isn&#8217;t a total shock, since he was listed as &#8220;acting head&#8221; of local during a reorg that <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-memo-details-whos-who-in-armstrongs-aol-includes-partoll-coo-cahall-cto/">Armstrong oversaw in June</a>. But Partoll is a head-scratcher, since she was promoted to her new/old position during that same exec shuffle.</p>
<p>And what about those <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090814/massive-aol-layoffs-not-imminent-but-top-to-bottom-cost-exam-definitely-in-process/">layoffs</a>? Armstrong is almost certain to make some cuts at some point&#8211;and has told employees as much. But people familiar with the company say he hasn&#8217;t been focused on cost structure (i.e., cuts) until recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090915/another-aol-org-chart-shuffle-coo-partoll-search-boss-kannapell-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Inc. Pines for a Kindle Killer&#8211;If Someone Else Builds It</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090910/time-inc-pines-for-a-kindle-killer-if-someone-else-builds-it/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090910/time-inc-pines-for-a-kindle-killer-if-someone-else-builds-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal document]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Squires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maghound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plastic Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valleywag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=10843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Time Inc. building a Kindle Killer? Nope.

A report suggests that Time Inc. wants to get into the hardware business and produce its own e-reader.

That's something other publishers, like Hearst and News Corp., are actually doing or have at least mulled. But multiple sources familiar with the Time Warner unit's thinking say that's not the case here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/09/kindlekiller-250x223.jpg" alt="kindlekiller" title="kindlekiller" width="250" height="223" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-10853" />Is Time Inc. building a Kindle Killer? Nope.</p>
<p>My pal Owen Thomas, late of Valleywag, has published a piece for NBC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/tech/Time-Inc-Time-for-a-New-E-Reader-58563707.html">Bay Area local site</a> that suggests that Time Inc. wants to get into the hardware business and produce its own e-reader.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s something other publishers, like Hearst and News Corp. (NWS), are actually doing or have<a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090402/live-from-the-cable-show-rupert-murdoch-and-jeff-bewkes/"> at least mulled</a>. But multiple sources familiar with the Time Warner (TWX) unit&#8217;s thinking say that&#8217;s not the case here.</p>
<p>But the publisher certainly <em>is</em> thinking about ways to create specialized content for e-reader devices and about the best way to distribute that content.</p>
<p>Time Warner executives have talked about this openly for many months&#8211;see <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090616/time-inc-ceo-ann-moore-lets-put-the-digital-genie-back-in-the-bottle/">Time Inc. digital guru John Squires&#8217;s comments</a> in June&#8211;and Thomas appears to have gotten his hands on an internal document that addresses the same topic.</p>
<p>Most intriguing, according to Thomas&#8217;s read of the documents: A Hulu-like spinoff that would do&#8230;something:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>The presentation concludes that Time Inc. and other partners should form a new, jointly owned company. Time Inc. might spin out its Maghound service, a service which lets consumers bundle multiple magazines together into a single monthly subscription, to form the base of the joint venture. The company is also considering acquiring other businesses to jumpstart the venture.</p></blockquote>
<p>No comment from Time Inc.</p>
<p>But I do know that Time Inc.&#8217;s executives have met with other publishers about collaborating on e-reader standards, etc. And I do know that Time Inc. executives  think a special version of their print products, designed specifically for e-readers, is a good idea. Most everyone I talk to in magazine publishing, in fact, believes this.</p>
<p>And I understand why they do. In their minds, the e-reader versions of their products function just about the same way magazines do: People pay to read them and advertisers pay to distribute their messages through them. And&#8211;this part is crucially important, from their perspective&#8211;publishers retain control of distribution and the billing relationship with their customers.</p>
<p>That relationship gets obliterated in Amazon&#8217;s (AMZN) Kindle model: Publishers wholesale the stuff to Jeff Bezos, who deals with consumers directly. This is also one of the music industry&#8217;s big regrets about the digital age. Even though labels are selling their stuff on the Web, via Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) iTunes and others, they still don&#8217;t have direct relationships with its customers.</p>
<p>Which is why publishers are desperately hoping that they&#8217;ll be able to push their stuff through someone other than Jeff Bezos. On the surface, at least, it looks as though their wishes are being met: A bevy of Kindle competitors&#8211;Sony (SNE), Plastic Logic, iRex, etc.&#8211;is surfacing. Surely one or more of those will figure out how to offer publishers the terms they want.</p>
<p>But even if one or more of the Kindle clones succeeds, print publishers still have a core problem: They need to convince consumers that content&#8211;in any form, on any device&#8211;is worth paying for. That will work in some cases, but for many it&#8217;s going be a very hard slog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090910/time-inc-pines-for-a-kindle-killer-if-someone-else-builds-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL Mulls Director Choices for New Board of Spinoff</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090710/aol-mulls-director-choices-for-new-board-of-spin-off/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090710/aol-mulls-director-choices-for-new-board-of-spin-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bebo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capitalist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=15649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not often these days that you get any kind of public offering in the market for tech companies--so a lot of people in Silicon Valley and elsewhere are looking at the fall spinoff of AOL very carefully.

That's because, even though AOL is widely considered to be an also-ran by Silicon Valley, many are very interested in serving on its 10-12 member board.

Thus, AOL, with Time Warner's top execs' involvement, sources said, has compiled a list of about 70 possible candidates--picked, suggested and self-nominated--and is now proceeding to vet them and begin the process of asking people to serve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/board_of_directors_donkeysjpg.jpeg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/board_of_directors_donkeysjpg-250x172.jpg" alt="board_of_directors_donkeysjpg" title="board_of_directors_donkeysjpg" width="250" height="172" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-15652" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not often these days that you get any kind of public offering in the market for tech companies&#8211;so a lot of people in Silicon Valley and elsewhere are looking at the fall spinoff of AOL very carefully.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because, even though AOL is widely considered to be an also-ran by Silicon Valley (same as it ever was, actually, even at the height of its power in the late 1990s), many are very interested in serving on its board.</p>
<p>According to many sources, exactly who will be on what will likely be a 10-12 member board of directors for the company is up for grabs, once it decouples from owner Time Warner (TWX).</p>
<p>Thus, AOL, with Time Warner&#8217;s top execs&#8217; involvement, sources said, has compiled a list of about 70 possible candidates&#8211;picked, suggested and self-nominated&#8211;and is now proceeding to vet them and begin the process of asking people to serve.</p>
<p>It should not be a tough sell. After all, despite its recent struggles, AOL remains one of the major Internet sites, with massive traffic, several well-known products and a large advertising business.</p>
<p>In addition, people seem inclined to see what kind of overhaul new CEO and Chairman Tim Armstrong can pull off and whether the former Google (GOOG) exec can work some magic.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090528/aol-spin-off-approved-last-night-by-time-warner-board-heres-the-inside-details-not-in-the-press-release">formulating plans for what stays and what goes in the company</a> as he tries to shine up the apple&#8211;or put lipstick on the pig, depending on your perspective&#8211;for investor consumption.</p>
<p>That includes keeping the access business, which many thought would be sold off, and putting many of the companies it has recently acquired&#8211;including its pricey Bebo social networking site&#8211;in a separate ventures unit, which will try to attract outside investment or sell off assets.</p>
<p>The strategy will focus AOL on several key areas, including media, local, “scaled” advertising and communications.</p>
<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/funny-pictures-cat-is-cuter-than-baby-and-should-be-pickedjpg.jpeg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/funny-pictures-cat-is-cuter-than-baby-and-should-be-pickedjpg-250x181.jpg" alt="funny-pictures-cat-is-cuter-than-baby-and-should-be-pickedjpg" title="funny-pictures-cat-is-cuter-than-baby-and-should-be-pickedjpg" width="250" height="181" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-15658" /></a></p>
<p>The jury is out on how successful Armstrong will be at innovating at AOL. But with almost zero IPO action and little prospect of any in the near future, it&#8217;s about the only such game in town as it moves to what is likely to be an October spinoff.</p>
<p>To help Armstrong sort through the choices, BoomTown is now compiling a suggestion list of fancy names I would recommend, and will do another post on that next, along with a general idea of what stays and what goes.</p>
<p>Until then, here are the broad outlines of what AOL needs to look for in a board:</p>
<p>One media mogul, one consumer electronics exec, one entrepreneur, one publishing exec, one Time Warner exec, one social networking exec, one advertising exec, one entertainment/Hollywood exec, one telecom/mobile exec, one consumer brand exec, one Internet mogul, and, of course, Armstrong.</p>
<p>And, as a definite requirement, given that there are way too many on way too many Internet company boards: No venture capitalists need apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090710/aol-mulls-director-choices-for-new-board-of-spin-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff Bewkes&#039;s Internal Memo on the AOL Spinoff</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090528/jeff-bewkes-internal-memo-on-the-aol-spin-off/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090528/jeff-bewkes-internal-memo-on-the-aol-spin-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kara Swisher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bewkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kara.allthingsd.com/?p=13959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes's memo on the AOL spinoff, which was approved by the media giant's board last night and announced this morning.

BoomTown reported a lot of the deep details of the new structure of the online unit, which sweeps aside the previous one and includes a new venture unit.

Here's the memo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/memo-main_fulljpg.jpeg"><img src="http://kara.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/memo-main_fulljpg-250x263.jpg" alt="memo-main_fulljpg" title="memo-main_fulljpg" width="250" height="263" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-13967" /></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes&#8217;s Memo on the AOL spinoff, which was approved by the media giant&#8217;s board last night and announced this morning.</p>
<p>BoomTown <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090528/aol-spin-off-approved-last-night-by-time-warner-board-heres-the-inside-details-not-in-the-press-release/">reported a lot of the deep details of the new structure</a> of the online unit, which sweeps aside the previous one and includes a new venture unit.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the memo:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>May 28, 2009</p>
<p>To: Time Warner Colleagues</p>
<p>From: Jeff Bewkes</p>
<p>Subject: Time Warner Announces Plan to Separate AOL</p>
<p>As you know, we’ve been working with AOL’s new management to move that company into the next phase of its evolution. To that end, we’ve been discussing the optimal ownership structure to enable AOL to fully realize its potential as a global Web services company. This morning, we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized management to proceed with plans for the complete legal and structural separation of AOL from Time Warner. Following the proposed transaction, which we aim to complete around the end of the year, AOL would be an independent, publicly traded company.</p>
<p>We believe that a separation will place both Time Warner and AOL in the best position to succeed, with greater operational and strategic flexibility. As an independent company, AOL should be a stronger competitor that is better able to deliver new and innovative products and services. At the same time, the separation will be another important step in the process we began last year of refocusing Time Warner to an even greater degree on our core content businesses.</p>
<p>For additional details about the proposed transaction, please click here to read the press release. I know you will have questions about this separation and how it may affect you and our company. We will provide more information as it becomes available over the coming months.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I’d like to thank the management and employees of AOL for the many contributions they have made, and continue to make, to our company. I’d also like to thank all Time Warner employees for your hard work and dedication.  We’re making great progress toward our goals of building Time Warner into the world&#8217;s leading content company and improving our stockholders&#8217; returns.  With your continued support, I’m confident we have a bright future.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090528/jeff-bewkes-internal-memo-on-the-aol-spin-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Update, 4.11.09</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090411/weekend-update-41109/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090411/weekend-update-41109/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver J. Chiang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BoomTown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BumpTop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carol Bartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Singleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Yang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kara Swisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver J. Chiang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott McNealy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True/Slant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Music Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vevo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back to Weekend Update, where we showcase some of the highlights from this site over the past week. In the umpteenth round of the old versus new media match, the Associated Press in its annual meeting this week played into the stereotype of the grizzled no-nonsense editor who shakes his fist at the new interweb thing (or was it intertube?) and its feisty friend, Google News, who are running amok on his lawn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090411/weekend-update-41109/weekendupdate041109/" rel="attachment wp-att-16353"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/weekendupdate041109-250x141.jpg" alt="weekendupdate041109" title="weekendupdate041109" width="340" height="193" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-16353" /></a></p>
<p>Welcome back to Weekend Update, where we showcase some of the highlights from this site over the past week.</p>
<p>In the umpteenth round of the old media versus new media match, the Associated Press in its annual meeting this week played into the stereotype of the grizzled no-nonsense editor who <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090406/ap-shakes-fist-at-google-tells-internet-to-get-off-its-damn-lawn/">shakes his fist at the new interweb thing (or was it intertube?) and its feisty friend Google News, who are running amok on his lawn</a>. In addition to trying to &#8220;protect news content from misappropriation,&#8221; AP board chairman and MediaNews group CEO Dean Singleton emphasized that print was the &#8220;meat,&#8221; while online was merely the &#8220;salt and pepper.&#8221; Unimpressed, BoomTown thought Singleton was <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090407/its-actually-about-selling-the-sizzle-and-not-the-steak-dean/">singling out the steak while missing the sizzle</a>.</p>
<p>In response, Google (GOOG), or He Who Was Not Named, posted a polite, if rather ambiguous, statement on its public policy blog, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090408/boomtown-decodes-googles-associated-press-blog-so-you-dont-have-to/">which was just begging for translation</a>. Also doing some interpreting of his own, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090410/ap-exec-to-the-untrained-eye-it-looks-like-were-stupid/">AP executive Jim Kennedy spoke with MediaMemo</a> on just what all the fire and brimstone was about. In quieter newspaper-related news, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090408/wsj-promises-new-pay-sites-some-day/">The Wall Street Journal continues on its quest to spread pay content online</a>, possibly through niche content, according to WSJ.com Executive Editor Alan Murray. Also experimenting online is the <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090408/trueslant-tests-another-model-of-web-journalism/">recently opened news Web site, True/Slant</a>, a heady combination of journalism, social networking and advertising.</p>
<p>Another news item that&#8217;s gotten people talking is the fallout from the collapsed IBM-Sun merger, aka <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090406/raise-the-yangtanic-again-sunibm-gets-new-tech-metaphor-thrown-at-it-also-not-so-currie-licious/">Sun pulls a Jerry Yang</a>. (Oh Jerry, the Internet kids because it loves&#8230; loves to kid! Pwn-age.) Following the news of the collapse, Sun (JAVA) shares dropped more than 27 percent, leading analysts and Digital Daily to predict difficult times ahead for the company, <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090406/whos-your-ma-consultant-sun-jerry-yang/">here</a> and later <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090407/investors-to-sun-weve-got-another-place-for-you-to-put-the-dot-you-put-in-dot-com/">here</a> as the stock continued its fall over the week. Besides quashing its own stock price, Sun also quashed <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090406/sun-may-the-schwartz-be-with-you/">rumors that chairman and co-founder Scott McNealy would replace CEO Jonathan Schwartz</a>.</p>
<p>Other nonthematic highlights this week:</p>
<p>BoomTown got the exclusive on the anticipated <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090410/yahoos-bartz-and-microsofts-ballmer-finally-talking-about-search-and-advertising-partnership/">talks between Yahoo&#8217;s (YHOO) Carol Bartz and Microsoft&#8217;s (MSFT) Steve Ballmer</a> in which the two CEOs discussed the possibility of a search and advertising partnership. Speaking of exclusivity, <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090409/who-will-be-twitters-bestest-search-friend-google-and-microsoft-engage-in-yet-another-pick-me-face-off/">Google and Microsoft like totally want to be Twitter&#8217;s new bff</a>, or maybe go steady if Twitter&#8217;s interested.</p>
<p>Digital Daily ruminated on <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090406/time-warner-on-aol-we-ought-to-have-that-removed/">speculations of Time Warner (TWX) doing an AOL spinoff</a>, especially after its hire of former Google exec Tim Armstrong and its attempts to amend debt agreements as per an SEC filing. Also in the rumor mill: The <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090406/hello-and-welcome-to-imoviephone/">iPhone 3.0 may support onboard video editing</a>. Less of a rumor and more of a slap in the face, to Apple (AAPL) at least: <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090408/elan-gives-apple-the-multi-finger/">Elan Microelectronics has taken off the gloves (and taken up the lawsuit)</a> because it believes that Apple&#8217;s products infringe on its touchscreen patents.</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090410/can-universal-music-run-its-own-hulu-its-going-to-try/">MediaMemo goes over the facts about Vevo</a>, the new online music video hub that&#8217;s a partnership between Google&#8217;s YouTube and Vivendi&#8217;s Universal Music Group, with interesting ramifications for both. Meanwhile, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090407/now-available-at-itunes-price-hikes-for-music/">iTunes has put in place its new tiered-pricing system</a>, in which songs will now cost 69 cents, 99 cents, or $1.29. But in a question that shocked no one: Where are the all the lowest-tier songs? Don&#8217;t worry your pretty little heads, said Big Music, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090408/big-music-cheaper-music-coming-to-itunes-trust-us/">they&#8217;re on their way</a>.</p>
<p>In a new Mossblog, Walt Mossberg reports from the battlefield of the growing <a href="http://mossblog.allthingsd.com/20090410/the-smartphone-wars/">Smartphone Wars</a>, in which iPhones, BlackBerries and others are engaged in mortal combat. In the Mossberg Solution, <a href="http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090407/a-desktop-that-begs-to-be-organized/">Katherine Boehret reviews BumpTop</a>, an application that takes your flat, plain old X-Y plane of a desktop to the next dimension, that is, the third dimension.</p>
<p>More next week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090411/weekend-update-41109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner on AOL: We Ought to Have That Removed&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090406/time-warner-on-aol-we-ought-to-have-that-removed/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090406/time-warner-on-aol-we-ought-to-have-that-removed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bewkes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael nathanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanford Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YHOO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s further confirmation that Time Warner  is looking to spin off AOL. In an SEC filing Monday, the company said it is seeking to amend debt agreements that restrict it from unloading the struggling business. Coming as it does after the hiring of Tim Armstrong, a former Google executive, as AOL CEO and chairman, the move would seem to suggest that Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes has given up on the idea of an AOL merger with Yahoo and is pushing ahead full-bore with a spinoff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/04/aol_killed_by.jpg" alt="aol_killed_by" title="aol_killed_by" width="200" height="200" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16142" />Here&#8217;s further confirmation that Time Warner (TWX)  is looking to spin off AOL. In an SEC filing Monday, the company said it is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=apnE9wmtykM0&amp;refer=us">seeking to amend debt agreements</a> that restrict it from unloading the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080806/aols-ad-business-not-so-much-leading-as-leaden/">struggling business</a>. Coming as it does after <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090312/jeff-bewkes-lays-off-aol-ceo-and-president-in-a-new-york-minute/">the hire of Tim Armstrong</a>, a former Google (GOOG) executive, as AOL CEO and chairman, the move would seem to suggest that Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes has given up on the idea of an AOL merger with Yahoo (YHOO) and is <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5354LL20090406">pushing ahead full-bore with a spinoff</a> that, frankly, always seemed like the most likely option. &#8220;We view this announcement as significant as it clears a major hurdle to spin AOL to Time Warner shareholders,&#8221; Michael Nathanson of Sanford Bernstein wrote in a note to clients Monday. &#8220;This potential move, along with the recent hiring of Tim Armstrong, suggests that the spinning of AOL could likely be announced in the next few months.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090406/time-warner-on-aol-we-ought-to-have-that-removed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yellow Pages Companies Sinking Into Oblivion</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090313/yellow-pages-companies-sinking-into-oblivion/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090313/yellow-pages-companies-sinking-into-oblivion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creditors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idearc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow Pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=9457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a vivid reminder of the way the Internet--combined with a vicious recession--can destroy a well-established industry, consider today’s news from the collapsing Yellow Pages business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a vivid reminder of the way the Internet&#8211;combined with a vicious recession&#8211;can destroy a well-established industry, consider today’s news from the collapsing Yellow Pages business.</p>
<p>Idearc, a 2006 spinoff from Verizon (VZ), late yesterday warned investors that it is considering various ways to restructure its mountainous debt; among the options it&#8217;s mulling over are a prepackaged bankruptcy filing; though the company said if it can’t negotiate a prepackaged deal with creditors, it might filed for bankruptcy protection anyway.</p>
<p>CEO Scott Klein said in a statement that the directory publisher is “making progress on our transformational and cost-cutting initiatives,” but that “the unprecedented economic challenges this nation is facing are creating never-before-seen obstacles for our clients and, as a result, for us as well.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/03/13/yellow-pages-companies-sinking-into-oblivion/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090313/yellow-pages-companies-sinking-into-oblivion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guess We Forgot to Delete the “Out” From &quot;Without&quot; in Your Termination Letter</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090305/guess-we-forgot-to-delete-the-%e2%80%9cout%e2%80%9d-from-without-in-your-termination-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090305/guess-we-forgot-to-delete-the-%e2%80%9cout%e2%80%9d-from-without-in-your-termination-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crain's Chicago Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Liska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=14275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Motorola CFO Paul Liska thought he’d been let go because the company was postponing the spinoff of its cellphone unit. Imagine his surprise when he read in Crain’s Chicago Business that he’d actually been fired for cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/01/wp_143-300x167.jpg" alt="" title="wp_143" width="300" height="167" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-11937" /></p>
<p>Former Motorola CFO Paul Liska thought he&#8217;d been let go because the company was postponing the spinoff of its cellphone unit. Imagine his surprise when <a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=33188">he read in Crain&#8217;s Chicago Business</a> that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123622461119236983.html">he&#8217;d actually been fired for cause</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/68505/000095013709001476/c49150ppre14a.htm">a recent SEC filing</a>, Motorola (MOT) said Liska was &#8220;involuntarily terminated for cause&#8221; and therefore must repay his $400,000 signing bonus and forfeit the stock options he received when he signed on with the company.</p>
<p>An odd disclosure, given the way in which Motorola&#8217;s leadership handled Liska&#8217;s departure. Asked about the circumstances surrounding his exit on <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/118199-motorola-inc-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1">a Feb. 9 earnings call</a>, Motorola co-CEO Greg Brown had this to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;[Paul] did a lot of good work here and helped us get a lot of the heavy lifting done around this separation and preparation for separation which&#8211;as we talked about&#8211;remains the commitment to our strategy going forward and he was also very helpful in getting after along with the businesses and the other leaders in the organization, cost reduction initiatives. That said, I think the business environment’s changed, and given the environmental changes, we thought the change was appropriate at this time as well in that position.&#8221;</p>
<p>If that was the case, why was he fired for cause, which Motorola defines as&#8211;among other things&#8211;&#8221;willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties&#8221; and &#8220;gross misconduct&#8221;?</p>
<p>We may soon find out. Liska has reportedly filed suit against Motorola for wrongful termination.</p>
<p>[<em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.someecards.com/">Someecards</a></em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090305/guess-we-forgot-to-delete-the-%e2%80%9cout%e2%80%9d-from-without-in-your-termination-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guess We Forgot to Delete the “Out” From "Without" in Your Termination Letter</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090305/guess-we-forgot-to-delete-the-%e2%80%9cout%e2%80%9d-from-without-in-your-termination-letter-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090305/guess-we-forgot-to-delete-the-%e2%80%9cout%e2%80%9d-from-without-in-your-termination-letter-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crain's Chicago Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Liska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=14275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Motorola CFO Paul Liska thought he’d been let go because the company was postponing the spinoff of its cellphone unit. Imagine his surprise when he read in Crain’s Chicago Business that he’d actually been fired for cause.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/01/wp_143-300x167.jpg" alt="" title="wp_143" width="300" height="167" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-11937" /></p>
<p>Former Motorola CFO Paul Liska thought he&#8217;d been let go because the company was postponing the spinoff of its cellphone unit. Imagine his surprise when <a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=33188">he read in Crain&#8217;s Chicago Business</a> that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123622461119236983.html">he&#8217;d actually been fired for cause</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/68505/000095013709001476/c49150ppre14a.htm">a recent SEC filing</a>, Motorola (MOT) said Liska was &#8220;involuntarily terminated for cause&#8221; and therefore must repay his $400,000 signing bonus and forfeit the stock options he received when he signed on with the company.</p>
<p>An odd disclosure, given the way in which Motorola&#8217;s leadership handled Liska&#8217;s departure. Asked about the circumstances surrounding his exit on <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/118199-motorola-inc-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=-1">a Feb. 9 earnings call</a>, Motorola co-CEO Greg Brown had this to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;[Paul] did a lot of good work here and helped us get a lot of the heavy lifting done around this separation and preparation for separation which&#8211;as we talked about&#8211;remains the commitment to our strategy going forward and he was also very helpful in getting after along with the businesses and the other leaders in the organization, cost reduction initiatives. That said, I think the business environment’s changed, and given the environmental changes, we thought the change was appropriate at this time as well in that position.&#8221;</p>
<p>If that was the case, why was he fired for cause, which Motorola defines as&#8211;among other things&#8211;&#8221;willful and continued failure to substantially perform duties&#8221; and &#8220;gross misconduct&#8221;?</p>
<p>We may soon find out. Liska has reportedly filed suit against Motorola for wrongful termination.</p>
<p>[<em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.someecards.com/">Someecards</a></em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090305/guess-we-forgot-to-delete-the-%e2%80%9cout%e2%80%9d-from-without-in-your-termination-letter-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

