<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Standard &amp; Poor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/standard-poor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Intel Says Sandy Bridge Support Chip Has &quot;Design Errors&quot;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110131/intel-says-sandy-bridge-support-chip-has-design-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110131/intel-says-sandy-bridge-support-chip-has-design-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arik Hesseldahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arik Hesseldahl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clyde Montevirgen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Core i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entium bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. P. Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Moskowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McAfee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NewEnterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentium Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel finds an error in a chip alongside its Sandy Bridge processor. Its shares are taking a beating while those of rival AMD are up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/files/2011/01/intelsb.jpg" alt="" title="intelsb" width="237" height="264" class="alignright size-full wp-image-2603" />Shares of Intel are taking a bit of a drubbing today as the company announced it had discovered a design error in a chip supporting its Sandy Bridge generation of microprocessors. The chip is called Cougar Point, and it&#8217;s involved with the data connection to other devices within or outside the computer&#8211;hard drives or internal optical drives&#8211;using SATA connections. Intel says the performance of these connections could degrade over time. The systems affected have Core i5 and Core i7 quad-core chips.</p>
<p>The company has already stopped making the chip with the problem, but as is always the case with the incredibly complex process of semiconductor manufacturing, doing so is a costly process. Intel said it will reduce its revenue forecast for the first quarter by $300 million as it ends production of the old chip and gets volume of the new one ramped up. Total cost to repair and replace affected materials and computers already sold with the problem chip will be $700 million.</p>
<p>Those with long memories will recall Intel&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_Bug">Pentium bug in the mid-1990s</a>, which caused a big crisis of confidence in Intel chips, jokes from late-night TV hosts and a drop in the company&#8217;s stock price. This error is nothing like that. The company says the processor itself is unaffected.</p>
<p>Analysts are telling investors not to overreact. &#8220;Assuming pent-up demand for Sandy Bridge and mild competition, we think impact of this problem will be relatively small,&#8221; Standard &#038; Poor&#8217;s analyst Clyde Montevirgen told clients in a note today. Mark Moskowitz of J.P. Morgan said it is likely that only a small number of end consumers are affected.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Intel closed its $1.4 billion deal to <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100830/intel-to-acquire-infineons-wireless-division/">acquire the wireless chip division</a> of the German chipmaker Infineon, and said it expects to finally close its <a href="http://newenterprise.allthingsd.com/20101221/u-s-regulators-approve-intels-perplexing-acquisition-of-mcafee/">$7.7 billion acquisition of McAfee</a> by the end of the quarter.</p>
<p>The combination of those two deals plus the chip trouble caused Intel to issue new guidance for the first quarter. It now expects first-quarter sales in the range of $11.3 billion to $12.1 billion, which is slightly higher than previous guidance. However it shaved three points off its gross margin forecast: The mid-point of the range is now 61 percent, down from 64 percent.</p>
<p>Intel shares are down more than one percent at the moment, while shares of rival Advanced Micro Devices are surging by more than five percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110131/intel-says-sandy-bridge-support-chip-has-design-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dueling Market Caps: Apple and Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100422/apple-surpasses-microsoft-on-sp-500/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100422/apple-surpasses-microsoft-on-sp-500/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Silverblatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=39038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well look at that: With a float-adjusted market cap of $241.5 billion, Apple is now the second largest company on the S&#38;P 500, ahead of Microsoft. But on a full value basis, it's not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<em><strong>Note: </strong>This post has been rewritten to clarify the difference between float-adjusted market cap and full-value basis market cap.</em>]</p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/04/jobs-ballmer-banjo.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/04/jobs-ballmer-banjo-275x275.jpg" alt="" title="Jobs and Ballmer: Dueling Market Caps" width="275" height="275" class="alignright" /></a></p>
<p>Apple is slowly but surely closing in on Microsoft in market cap. </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2010/04/22/apple-edges-out-microsoft-as-2-in-sp-500/">According to  Standard &#038; Poor&#8217;s analyst Howard Silverblatt</a>, Apple&#8217;s float-adjusted market capitalization reached $241.5 billion Thursday, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-passes-microsoft-for-second-place-in-sp-500-2010-04-22?dist=afterbell">edging past Microsoft&#8217;s $239.5 billion</a>. </p>
<p>Said Silverblatt: &#8220;It came right down to the trade, but AAPL has an index market value of $241,534 million and MSFT has a market value of $239,515 million&#8211;AAPL is #2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which means Apple (AAPL) is now second only to oil giant Exxon Mobil (XOM) on the S&#038;P&#8211;<em>on the index&#8217;s float-adjusted basis</em>.</p>
<p><em>But</em> on a full-market value basis&#8211;which, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-marketwatch-got-its-apple-beat-microsofts-market-cap-story-2010-4">as Dan Frommer explains over at Business Insider</a>, includes &#8220;shares that are closely held by control groups, other publicly traded companies or government agencies&#8221;&#8211;Microsoft (MSFT) remains firmly in second place, with a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/MSFT">market cap of $275 billion</a>&#8211;significantly larger than Apple&#8217;s.</p>
<p>So this float-adjusted achievement of Apple&#8217;s is really more of a psychological milestone than anything, one made possible only because S&#038;P is counting just the 87 percent of Microsoft&#8217;s shares that are available for public trading. Below, a chart from Silicon Alley Insider that shows more clearly what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/04/chart-of-the-day-apple-microsoft-market-cap.gif" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/04/chart-of-the-day-apple-microsoft-market-cap-275x206.gif" alt="" title="chart-of-the-day-apple-microsoft-market-cap" width="275" height="206" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-39094" /></a></p>
<p>[<em>Chart credit: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-marketwatch-got-its-apple-beat-microsofts-market-cap-story-2010-4">Business Insider</a></em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100422/apple-surpasses-microsoft-on-sp-500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S&amp;P Sees Microsoft-Yahoo JV, Google-Apple Tensions</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081231/sp-sees-microsoft-yahoo-jv-google-apple-tensions/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081231/sp-sees-microsoft-yahoo-jv-google-apple-tensions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tiernan Ray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Kessler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiernan Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=7242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Tis the season to make year 2009 predictions. Today, Standard &#38; Poor's analysts released their predictions for the Internet in 2009. Internet analyst Scott Kessler says Microsoft and Yahoo will "finally bury the hatchet" next year "and decide to join forces to better compete against Google."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Tis the season to make year 2009 predictions. Today, Standard &#038; Poor&#8217;s analysts released their predictions for the Internet in 2009. Scott Kessler, Internet analyst with S&#038;P, says Microsoft (MSFT) and Yahoo (YHOO) will &#8220;finally bury the hatchet&#8221; next year &#8220;and decide to join forces to better compete against Google&#8221; (GOOG). Kessler says Microsoft won&#8217;t buy Yahoo (well, they&#8217;ve already said they were no longer interested in that), but rather pursue a joint venture &#8220;related to search.&#8221; He thinks that could lift Yahoo shares, to which he assigns a &#8220;Buy&#8221; rating.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/30/sp-sees-microsoft-yahoo-jv-google-apple-tensions/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081231/sp-sees-microsoft-yahoo-jv-google-apple-tensions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell: Stock Swoons on Gross Margin Miss</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080829/dell-stock-swoons-on-gross-margin-miss/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080829/dell-stock-swoons-on-gross-margin-miss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggressive stance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard & Poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnaround]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsteady margin pattern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=3332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, the market is suffering in Dell (DELL) hell.
Last night, the company posted results for its fiscal second quarter ended July, which beat the Street impressively on the top line, but at the cost of lower-than-expected gross margins, resulting in a miss at the EPS level.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, the market is suffering in Dell (DELL) hell.</p>
<p>Last night, the company posted results for its fiscal second quarter ended July, which beat the Street impressively on the top line, but at the cost of lower-than-expected gross margins, resulting in a miss at the EPS level. The Street commentary this morning is mixed: Quite a few analysts contend this is a temporary issue, that the company knows it got overly aggressive on pricing in Europe generally&#8211;on notebooks in particular&#8211;and can fix the issue quickly. But others contend that Dell&#8217;s turnaround has taken a giant step backward. They worry that there is more trouble ahead and note the company&#8217;s warning that IT spending is showing signs of slowing not only in the U.S. but also in Europe and some countries in Asia. The results didn&#8217;t change a lot of minds on the stock overall; the one downgrade of the stock I spotted came from Standard &#038; Poor&#8217;s analyst Tom Smith, who cut his rating to Hold from Buy, asserting that with &#8220;unsteady margin patterns&#8221; likely to continue, it is time to &#8220;take a less aggressive stance.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/08/29/dell-stock-swoons-on-gross-margin-miss/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080829/dell-stock-swoons-on-gross-margin-miss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

