<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; unit sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/unit-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Macmillan CEO Defends E-Book Price Hike, Again</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100303/macmillan-ceo-defends-e-book-price-hike-again/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100303/macmillan-ceo-defends-e-book-price-hike-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Reader Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardcover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sargent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[title]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=16913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheers to Macmillan CEO John Sargent, who has taken to writing long open letters to his readers about changes in his company's e-book pricing model. Alas, the newest installment, on the company's blog, doesn't add much more to the discussion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/ibooks.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-15695" title="ibooks" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2010/01/ibooks.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="180" /></a>Cheers to Macmillan CEO John Sargent, who has taken to writing long open letters to his readers about changes in his company&#8217;s e-book pricing model. Alas, the newest installment, on the company&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.macmillanspeaks.com/macmillan-ceo-john-sargent-on-the-agency-model-availability-and-price/">blog</a>, doesn&#8217;t add much more to the discussion.</p>
<p>The short version: Sargent wants you to know that while he&#8217;s going to raise prices on new e-book titles, that doesn&#8217;t mean <em>all</em> e-book prices will be going up.</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>There has been a lot of concern from e-book readers that $9.99 books will no longer be available. Most Macmillan e-books will still be priced below ten dollars. Our e-book sales over the last year clearly indicate that only about a third of our e-book business is in the digital versions of new release hardcovers. Unit sales of older books far exceed our new release hardcover sales, so the $9.99 and lower prices will continue to represent the largest portion of our business.</p></blockquote>
<p>This will be an interesting data point to remember when prices do bump up this spring, prompted by Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) entry into the e-book market via the iPad, and <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100130/the-apple-amazon-book-war-heats-up-and-claims-macmillan-as-a-casualty/#comments">Amazon&#8217;s (AMZN) reluctant acceptance</a> of the new scheme.</p>
<p>But ultimately, it&#8217;s a red herring. Either you&#8217;re sympathetic to <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100202/news-corp-beats-earnings-revenue-estimates/">publishers&#8217; attempts to protect pricing of their paper-and-ink books</a> or you&#8217;re not. If you want a good summary of the debate, check out the comments on Sargent&#8217;s post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100303/macmillan-ceo-defends-e-book-price-hike-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Publishers Beware! At iTunes, Expensive Music Equals Slower Sales.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100209/book-publishers-beware-at-itunes-expensive-music-equals-slower-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100209/book-publishers-beware-at-itunes-expensive-music-equals-slower-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital track equivalent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics lesson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgar Bronfman Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mature business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variable pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Music Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=16092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book publishers itching to raise the prices on their e-books should pay attention to the music labels, which raised the prices on their downloads last spring. Consumers, it turns out, like paying less for stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/cheapthrills_sm.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-16102" title="cheapthrills_sm" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/cheapthrills_sm-246x300.jpg" alt="" width="246" height="300" /></a>After years of complaints, last year the music labels finally got what they wanted from Apple&#8211;<a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090106/confirmed-itunes-going-drm-free-unclear-does-anyone-care/">the ability to raise prices on their songs</a>. Last April, <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090407/now-available-at-itunes-price-hikes-for-music/">iTunes introduced a &#8220;variable pricing&#8221; scheme</a>, which gave the labels the ability to move prices from 99 cents a song to $1.29 (and for some tracks, down to 69 cents).</p>
<p>The result? Music sales are slowing.</p>
<p>Warner Music Group (WMG) said this morning that it has seen unit sales growth at Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) iTunes decelerate since the price increase: Industrywide, year-over-year &#8220;digital track equivalent album unit growth&#8221; was at five percent in the December quarter, down sequentially from 10 percent in the September quarter and 11 percent in the June quarter.</p>
<p>And since iTunes sales make up the majority of Warner&#8217;s digital revenue, growth is contracting there, too. In the last quarter, digital revenue at the label was up eight percent compared with a year earlier, when that number was 20 percent.</p>
<p>The positive spin here is that music downloads are a &#8220;mature&#8221; business anyway. So by raising prices, the labels are simply extracting whatever value they can.</p>
<p>And indeed, Warner CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. argued that the pricing change has been a &#8220;net positive&#8221; for Warner. But he also suggested that in hindsight, perhaps it wasn&#8217;t a great idea to raise prices 30 percent during a recession.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s the question for the book industry, which has been <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100204/hachette-joins-apples-anti-amazon-book-club/">working</a> <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100202/news-corp-beats-earnings-revenue-estimates/">very</a> <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100131/amazon-gives-in-to-macmillan-and-apple-and-e-book-prices-will-go-up/">hard</a> to boost the price for its digital goods: Which lesson do you learn from this?</p>
<p>My gut is that the industry will see this parable the way Bronfman apparently does: If you can move prices up early in the digital adoption cycle, you&#8217;re much better off.</p>
<p>During the earnings call, Bronfman sounded a bit wistful as he noted the book industry&#8217;s apparent success, with the help of Apple, at raising prices above the $9.99 floor Amazon (AMZN) had set. &#8220;It&#8217;s interesting that the book publishing industry, on the iPad, has much more flexibility than the music industry had,&#8221; he noted.</p>
<p>The counter here is the one that seems obvious to everyone else: Lower prices and you can sell more stuff. Looks like we&#8217;ll be getting another real-world test of this economics lesson soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100209/book-publishers-beware-at-itunes-expensive-music-equals-slower-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Chip Sales Down 9 Percent in 2009&#8211;Not 11 Percent</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100201/global-chip-sales-down-9-percent-in-2009-not-11-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100201/global-chip-sales-down-9-percent-in-2009-not-11-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic downturn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Scalise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiconductor Industry Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=33980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global chip sales fell nine percent in 2009, beaten down by the econalypse, which hamstrung demand for all manner of consumer electronics. A nasty drop, but not nearly as bad as it could have been or, indeed, what was expected. Because at $226.3 billion, total chip sales for the year were far better than the $219.7 billion the Semiconductor Industry Association had been expecting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/eatmorechips.jpg" alt="" title="eatmorechips" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-33988" />Global chip sales fell nine percent in 2009, beaten down by the econalypse, which hamstrung demand for all manner of consumer electronics. A nasty drop, but not nearly as bad as it could have been or, indeed, what was expected. Because at $226.3 billion, total chip sales for the year were far better than the $219.7 billion the Semiconductor Industry Association had been expecting (see chart below; click to enlarge). In November, the SIA estimated the industry would see a 11.6 percent decline in semiconductor sales; instead it saw a decline of nine percent.<br />
<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/chips.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/02/chips-275x206.jpg" alt="" title="chips" width="275" height="206" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-33981" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;2009 turned out to be a better year for the global semiconductor industry than expected,&#8221; <a href="http://www.sia-online.org/cs/papers_publications/press_release_detail?pressrelease.id=1707">SIA President George Scalise said in a statement</a>. &#8220;A strong focus on inventories throughout the supply chain mitigated the impact of the worldwide economic downturn and positioned the industry for growth as the global economy recovers.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, indeed, Scalise says the SIA expects &#8220;healthy&#8221; growth in  chip demand in 2010, with unit sales of PCs and cellphones&#8211;which account for about 60 percent of total semiconductor consumption&#8211;to grow in the low-to-midteens over the the coming year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100201/global-chip-sales-down-9-percent-in-2009-not-11-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm Disappoints</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091217/palm-posts-loss-ships-783000-smartphones/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091217/palm-posts-loss-ships-783000-smartphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting Standards Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjusted gross margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after-hours trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amortization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common stockholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depreciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developer Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBITDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Rubinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-GAAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restructuring charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell-through]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series C preferred shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. deferred tax assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebOS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=31029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second-quarter loss Palm reported Thursday afternoon was narrower than the one it reported last year, but still fell far short of what Wall Street had been expecting. The company did manage to ship a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, though, a five percent decrease from last quarter but a year-over-year increase of 41 percent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/12/images8.jpeg" alt="images" title="images" width="129" height="129" class="alignright size-full wp-image-31031" /></p>
<p>The second-quarter loss Palm reported Thursday afternoon was narrower than the one it reported last year, but still fell far short of what Wall Street had been expecting. The smartphone maker lost 37 cents a share for the period on sales of $302 million. Analysts had been expecting a net loss of 32 cents per share on revenue of $266.2 million. </p>
<p>Palm (PALM) did manage to ship a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, though, a five percent decrease from last quarter, but a year-over-year increase of 41 percent. That said, the company actually sold only 573,000 units, down 29 percent from the previous quarter and down four percent year-over-year. Seems the launch of the Pixi wasn&#8217;t quite as successful as Palm had hoped.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are continuing to execute strongly against our long-term strategy with the delivery of Palm Pixi, the new carrier launches completed this quarter, and the upcoming opening of Palm&#8217;s full developer program,&#8221; said Jon Rubinstein, Palm&#8217;s chairman and chief executive officer. </p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re still in the early stages of a long race,&#8221; Rubinstein added, &#8220;and we&#8217;re energized by the opportunity to compete in this exciting market. We remain confident that Palm&#8217;s innovative product design capabilities, integrated cloud services and the differentiated and delightful Palm webOS experience will provide the foundation for our sustained success.&#8221; </p>
<p>Once again, Palm did not break out unit sales of the Pre or Pixi in its earnings release, below. At $11.26, Palm shares are down 3.92 percent in after-hours trading.</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
<strong>Palm Reports Q2 FY 2010 Results</strong></p>
<p>SUNNYVALE, Calif.&#8211; Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ: PALM) today reported that total revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, ended Nov. 27, 2009, were $78.1 million. Gross profit was $5.5 million, and gross margin was 7.0 percent. These results include the effects of subscription accounting applied to Palm(R) webOS(TM) products as required by GAAP.(1) In accordance with this methodology, revenues and direct cost of revenues for Palm webOS products (currently Palm Pre(TM) and Palm Pixi(TM) smartphones) are deferred and recognized over the products&#8217; estimated economic lives.</p>
<p>To facilitate comparisons to Palm&#8217;s historical results, Palm has included non-GAAP adjusted measures, which exclude the impact of subscription accounting, stock-based compensation and other items detailed later in this release. The company believes this information will help investors better evaluate its current period performance and trends in its business.</p>
<p>Non-GAAP Adjusted Revenues in the second quarter totaled $302.0 million, non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit was $77.3 million and non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin was 25.6 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are continuing to execute strongly against our long-term strategy with the delivery of Palm Pixi, the new carrier launches completed this quarter, and the upcoming opening of Palm&#8217;s full developer program,&#8221; said Jon Rubinstein, Palm&#8217;s chairman and chief executive officer. &#8220;We&#8217;re still in the early stages of a long race, and we&#8217;re energized by the opportunity to compete in this exciting market. We remain confident that Palm&#8217;s innovative product design capabilities, integrated cloud services and the differentiated and delightful Palm webOS experience will provide the foundation for our sustained success.&#8221;</p>
<p>The company shipped a total of 783,000 smartphone units during the quarter, representing a 5 percent decrease from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and a year-over-year increase of 41 percent compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. Smartphone sell-through for the second quarter was 573,000 units, down 29 percent from the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and down 4 percent year-over-year.</p>
<p>On a GAAP basis, net loss applicable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $(85.4) million, or $(0.54) per diluted common share. This compares to a net loss applicable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $(508.6) million or $(4.64) per diluted common share. The company&#8217;s second quarter of fiscal year 2009 results included a non-cash charge with a net impact of $396.7 million to the tax provision pertaining to the increase of the valuation allowance for the Company&#8217;s U.S. deferred tax assets.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s net loss applicable to common stockholders on a GAAP basis reflects accounting guidance, effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which requires the anti-dilutive provisions of Palm&#8217;s series C preferred shares and related warrants to be treated as derivatives for financial reporting purposes. The fair value of the derivatives were estimated as of the first day of fiscal year 2010 and are marked to market on a quarterly basis, with any change in value reflected in the company&#8217;s financial results for the period. The series C derivatives balance was $178.7 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $235.0 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This reduction in fair value resulted in a $56.3 million non-cash gain on series C derivatives and was reflected in the company&#8217;s second quarter GAAP financial results. With regard to the series C derivatives, any future increases in Palm&#8217;s stock price from period to period will be reflected as a non-cash loss on these derivatives in the company&#8217;s financial results, and any future decreases will be reflected as a non-cash gain in the company&#8217;s financial results.</p>
<p>Non-GAAP Net Loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $(59.6) million, or $(0.37) per diluted share. This compares to a non-GAAP Net Loss for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $(80.2) million, or $(0.73) per diluted share.</p>
<p>Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 totaled $(70.1) million. EBITDA, adjusted to exclude the impact of subscription accounting, stock-based compensation, net other income (expense), restructuring charges and a gain on series C derivatives, or Adjusted EBITDA, totaled $(48.3) million.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments balance was $590.0 million at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. This includes net proceeds of approximately $360 million from the company&#8217;s public equity offering, which closed on Sept. 23, 2009. Cash from operations for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $16.7 million.</p>
<p>Palm may periodically provide new software features free of charge to customers of its Palm webOS products and currently recognizes Palm webOS product revenues and related standard cost of revenues on a subscription basis based on the applicable product&#8217;s estimated economic life, which is currently 24 months. The company records deferred revenues and deferred cost of revenues on its balance sheet, and amortizes them into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life.</p>
<p>Palm announced today that it expects to early adopt two recently released accounting standards related to revenue recognition, Accounting Standards Update (&#8220;ASU&#8221;) No. 2009-13 and ASU No. 2009-14, effective for its third quarter of fiscal year 2010. These accounting changes will result in a substantial portion of Palm webOS product revenues being recognized upon delivery. The remaining Palm webOS revenues, which are related to future services and deliverables, will be recorded as deferred revenues on the company&#8217;s balance sheet, and amortized into earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic product life, which is currently 24 months. Under the new standards, all related cost of revenues will be recognized upon delivery. This change in accounting will reduce the amount of revenues that Palm will defer on its balance sheet but will have no impact on cash flows and does not change how Palm accounts for Palm OS(R) products, like the Centro(TM), or its Treo(TM) line. Consistent with the company&#8217;s past practice, Palm will continue to provide non-GAAP, adjusted measures that exclude the impact of deferred revenue accounting, stock-based compensation and other items as appropriate.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091217/palm-posts-loss-ships-783000-smartphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 PC Sales Not So Lousy After All</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091124/2009-pc-sales-not-so-lousy-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091124/2009-pc-sales-not-so-lousy-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boutique banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Quattrone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iconic devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Klayko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=29792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=F172C79B-9F48-4C59-9757-82746EA29049&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={F172C79B-9F48-4C59-9757-82746EA29049}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091124/2009-pc-sales-not-so-lousy-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Game Sales Tank</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091113/videogame-industry-suffers-massively-multiplayer-sales-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091113/videogame-industry-suffers-massively-multiplayer-sales-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anita Frazier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borderlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy Tracker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FIFA Soccer 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forza Motorsport 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halo 3: ODST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kingdom Hearts 358]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA 2K10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo DS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayStation 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncharted 2: Among Thieves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii Fit Plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii Sports Resort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year over year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=28916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the latest sales data are any indication, the videogame industry may be headed for a rough holiday season. NPD Group reports that revenue from consoles and software plummeted during October, falling 16.4 percent from September and 19 percent year-over-year. It was the industry’s seventh consecutive monthly decline.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/11/knockout.jpg" alt="knockout" title="knockout" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-28915" />If the latest sales data are any indication, the videogame industry may be headed for a rough holiday season. NPD Group reports that revenue from consoles and software plummeted during October, falling 16.4 percent from September and 19 percent year-over-year. It was the industry&#8217;s seventh consecutive monthly decline. </p>
<p>&#8220;The continued economic turmoil, and in particular the troubling unemployment rate, is undoubtedly impacting industry sales,&#8221; said NPD analyst Anita Frazier. &#8220;Our latest Economy Tracker indicated that although consumers&#8217; general opinion about the economy is improving, their outlook on their own personal situation is worsening. If consumers&#8217; personal outlook continues to erode, they could very well be much more conservative with their holiday shopping this year.&#8221;</p>
<p>A somber warning for the videogame industry. Even recent price cuts on game consoles have done little to spur demand.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Year to date, the hardware category has experienced the sharpest decline in the industry, with unit sales down 10 percent compared to the same time period last year,&#8221; Frazier wrote. &#8220;Recent price cuts helped spur a one- to two-month increase in unit sales, and this month&#8217;s Wii sales reflect that boost, but the other platforms have not sustained the sales momentum after price reduction.&#8221;</p>
<p>The videogame industry may be recession-resistant, but it is clearly not recession-proof, as some once believed. Sales data, below.</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
<b>U.S. Hardware Sales, October 2009</b></p>
<ol>
<li>Wii 	506.9K</li>
<li>Nintendo DS 	457.6K</li>
<li>PlayStation 3 	320.6K</li>
<li>Xbox 360 	249.7K</li>
<li>PSP 	174.6K</li>
<li>PlayStation 2  	117.8K</li>
</ol>
<p><b>U.S. Top Ten Software Sales, October 2009</b></p>
<ol>
<li><em>Uncharted 2: Among Thieves</em> (PS3, Sony) 537,000</li>
<li><em>Wii Fit Plus</em> (Wii, Nintendo) 441,000</li>
<li><em>Borderlands </em>(360, Take 2) 418,000</li>
<li><em>Wii Sports Resort</em> (Wii, Nintendo) 314,000</li>
<li><em>NBA 2K10</em> (360, Take 2) 311,000</li>
<li><em>Halo 3: ODST</em> (360, Microsoft) 271,000</li>
<li><em>NBA 2K10</em> (PS3, Take 2) 213,000</li>
<li><em>Forza Motorsport 3</em> (360, Microsoft) 175,000</li>
<li><em>Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days</em> (DS, Square Enix) 169,000</li>
<li><em>FIFA Soccer 10</em> (360, Electronic Arts) 156,000</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091113/videogame-industry-suffers-massively-multiplayer-sales-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon&#039;s Blowout Q3</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/amz/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/amz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Weller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkEquity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wished for]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=27287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to comScore, Web traffic to Amazon in the U.S. rose 14.8 percent, far outstripping that of overall U.S. Internet traffic, which grew just 3.5 percent. "It appears that Amazon is gaining share the old-fashioned way," ThinkEquity analyst Ed Weller noted last week, “by acquiring more and more customers...and selling more to each of them.” Judging from the nice gain in third-quarter earnings the company posted after Thursday’s closing bell, that would seem to be the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/bezos_thumb-150x150.jpg" alt="bezos_thumb-150x150" title="bezos_thumb-150x150" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-27288" />According to comScore (SCOR), U.S. Web traffic to Amazon in the most recent quarter rose 14.8 percent, far outstripping that of overall U.S. Internet traffic, which grew just 3.5 percent.</p>
<p>&#8220;It appears that Amazon is gaining share the old-fashioned way,&#8221; ThinkEquity analyst Ed Weller noted last week, &#8220;by acquiring more and more customers&#8230;and selling more to each of them.&#8221; And judging from <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Amazoncom-Announces-Third-bw-2993724608.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">the nice gain in third-quarter earnings</a> the company posted after Thursday&#8217;s closing bell, that would seem to be the case.</p>
<p>Net income for the period surged 69 percent thanks to a strong increase in sales. Analysts had been looking for earnings of 33 cents a share on revenue of $5.02 billion for the quarter. Amazon (AMZN) reported 45 cents a share, compared with 27 cents a share for the same period the previous year. Revenue rose 28 percent to $5.45 billion.</p>
<p>Once again, it seems Amazon has not broken out Kindle sales numbers in its report, though CEO Jeff Bezos did stress them in an earnings release. Said Bezos: &#8220;Kindle has become the #1 bestselling item by both unit sales and dollars&#8211;not just in our electronics store but across all product categories on Amazon.com. It’s also the most wished for and the most gifted. We are grateful for and energized by this customer response.&#8221;</p>
<p>Looking ahead to the key fourth quarter, Amazon is calling for revenue in the range of $8.125 billion to $9.125 billion. Analysts have been forecasting revenue of $8.13 billion. Given that the upcoming quarter includes the annual holiday shopping binge, Amazon may be looking at another blowout quarter.</p>
<p>Shares in the company are spiking on the news, up over nine percent to $101.90 as I write this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/amz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon's Blowout Q3</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/amz-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/amz-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Weller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gifted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkEquity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wished for]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=27287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to comScore, Web traffic to Amazon in the U.S. rose 14.8 percent, far outstripping that of overall U.S. Internet traffic, which grew just 3.5 percent. "It appears that Amazon is gaining share the old-fashioned way," ThinkEquity analyst Ed Weller noted last week, “by acquiring more and more customers...and selling more to each of them.” Judging from the nice gain in third-quarter earnings the company posted after Thursday’s closing bell, that would seem to be the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/10/bezos_thumb-150x150.jpg" alt="bezos_thumb-150x150" title="bezos_thumb-150x150" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-full wp-image-27288" />According to comScore (SCOR), U.S. Web traffic to Amazon in the most recent quarter rose 14.8 percent, far outstripping that of overall U.S. Internet traffic, which grew just 3.5 percent. </p>
<p>&#8220;It appears that Amazon is gaining share the old-fashioned way,&#8221; ThinkEquity analyst Ed Weller noted last week, &#8220;by acquiring more and more customers&#8230;and selling more to each of them.&#8221; And judging from <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Amazoncom-Announces-Third-bw-2993724608.html?x=0&#038;.v=1">the nice gain in third-quarter earnings</a> the company posted after Thursday&#8217;s closing bell, that would seem to be the case. </p>
<p>Net income for the period surged 69 percent thanks to a strong increase in sales. Analysts had been looking for earnings of 33 cents a share on revenue of $5.02 billion for the quarter. Amazon (AMZN) reported 45 cents a share, compared with 27 cents a share for the same period the previous year. Revenue rose 28 percent to $5.45 billion.</p>
<p>Once again, it seems Amazon has not broken out Kindle sales numbers in its report, though CEO Jeff Bezos did stress them in an earnings release. Said Bezos: &#8220;Kindle has become the #1 bestselling item by both unit sales and dollars&#8211;not just in our electronics store but across all product categories on Amazon.com. It’s also the most wished for and the most gifted. We are grateful for and energized by this customer response.&#8221;</p>
<p>Looking ahead to the key fourth quarter, Amazon is calling for revenue in the range of $8.125 billion to $9.125 billion. Analysts have been forecasting revenue of $8.13 billion. Given that the upcoming quarter includes the annual holiday shopping binge, Amazon may be looking at another blowout quarter.</p>
<p>Shares in the company are spiking on the news, up over nine percent to $101.90 as I write this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091022/amz-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Dead Yet! The CD Still Rules Music (But iTunes Is Closing the Gap).</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090818/not-dead-yet-the-cd-still-rules-music-but-itunes-is-closing-the-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090818/not-dead-yet-the-cd-still-rules-music-but-itunes-is-closing-the-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocktail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact disc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=9979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ready to toss dirt on the old, unloved CD? You're going to have to wait a while. Compact discs are increasingly hard to find (at least in physical stores), but someone out there keeps buying them: The ancient format still makes up the majority of music sales in the U.S. And since album-length CDs are a whole lot more lucrative for the industry than iTunes singles, expect to see the industry cling to them as long it can get away with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/victrola_lady.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-9981 alignright" title="victrola_lady" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/victrola_lady-250x193.jpg" alt="victrola_lady" width="250" height="193" /></a></p>
<p>[<em>CORRECTION: My assertion about NPD's unit sales data below is incorrect: The tracking service counts 12 digital download singles as the equivalent of one CD. That makes Apple's share of the market that much more impressive, since singles make up the majority of iTunes sales</em>.]</p>
<p>Ready to toss dirt on the old, unloved CD? You&#8217;re going to have to wait a while. Compact discs are increasingly hard to find <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090228/music-retail-going-going-just-about-gone-virgin-shutting-two-more-music-stores/">(at least in physical stores)</a>, but someone out there keeps buying them: The ancient format still makes up the majority of music sales in the U.S.</p>
<p>Here are the data for the first half of the year, via the NPD Group consumer-tracking outfit: CDs made up 65 percent of the music market, while paid digital downloads accounted for 35 percent. The digital share has increased from 20 percent two years ago, and Apple&#8217;s iTunes (AAPL) alone makes up 25 percent of <em>overall</em> sales*, so you&#8217;re going to hear lots of proclamations about Steve Jobs&#8217;s ascent to the to top of the music industry.</p>
<p>But hold off on that, just a bit. Because those numbers are skewed even more in favor of the CD than they appear at first glance: They&#8217;re measuring <em>unit sales</em>, not <em>dollars</em>. And given that the majority of digital sales are in the single format (i.e., a dollar or so a pop), that means CDs (at $10 or so a pop) still account for the vast majority of music <em>revenue</em>.</p>
<p>Which is why the industry is still tied to CDs, even though no one you know buys them anymore. And it explains why the industry is working on two separate digital formats (dubbed &#8220;Cocktail&#8221; when sold by Apple, and <a href="http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2009/08/cmx-yet-another-new-digital-album-format.html">CMX</a> when sold by anyone else) designed to induce buyers to pay for CD-like bundles.</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t work. At best, they&#8217;ll convince some digital album buyers to upgrade, but the music business is once again a singles business, and it&#8217;s going to remain that way. But you can&#8217;t blame the industry for trying.</p>
<p>By the way, there are decent odds you&#8217;ll hear about Cocktail at <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090813/here-it-comes-but-what-is-it-exactly-apple-plans-keynote-event-for-september/">Apple&#8217;s September event</a>, which <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090817/apple-event-scheduled-for-wednesday-sept-9-music-only-no-tablet/">Digital Daily&#8217;s John Paczkowski says is scheduled for Sept. 9</a>. Mark your calendar.</p>
<p><object width="350" height="283" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/grbSQ6O6kbs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/grbSQ6O6kbs&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>*If you&#8217;re keeping track: Wal-Mart (WMT) and Target (TGT) trail Apple in the overall market. And iTunes still dominates the digital download market with a 69 percent share, while Amazon (AMZN) is a distant second with eight percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090818/not-dead-yet-the-cd-still-rules-music-but-itunes-is-closing-the-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Matter How Hard You Try, You Can't Get Apple to Say Anything Nice About a Netbook</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090721/live-apple-q3-earnings-call/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090721/live-apple-q3-earnings-call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[component]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installed base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3GS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short-term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=9516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is now an Apple earnings-call tradition: Analysts try their hardest to convince Apple executives to express interest in the booming market for cheap netbooks and Apple executives make it perfectly clear how much disdain they have for netbooks. But an $800 iTablet? That's something else altogether...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-9542" title="giant_iphone-150x150" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/giant_iphone-150x150.jpg" alt="giant_iphone-150x150" width="150" height="150" />This is now an Apple earnings-call tradition: Analysts try their hardest to convince Apple (AAPL) executives to express interest in the booming market for cheap netbooks and Apple executives make it perfectly clear how much disdain they have for netbooks.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the kind of thing that makes you happy, then you would love today&#8217;s call, in which the exact same thing happened again. Twice! From my transcription/paraphrase this afternoon:</p>
<p><strong>Q: </strong>What about getting into the low priced/netbook category?</p>
<p><strong>Apple COO Tim Cook: </strong>&#8220;Our goal is not to build the most computers, it&#8217;s to build the best. Whatever price point we can build the best in, we will play there. At this point, we don&#8217;t see a way to build a great product at that price point, $399, $499.&#8221; We think many customers buying those find themselves &#8220;disenchanted&#8221; after buying cheapo/netbooks.</p>
<p><strong>Q:</strong> Do you think there is an emerging market for a &#8220;truly mobile device&#8221; with a larger screen, a market big enough that you may want to participate?</p>
<p><strong>Cook:</strong> &#8220;Never want to discount anything in the future,&#8221; and never want to answer specifically your question about new products. [Duh.] But boy, do we think netbooks are lousy, and we think customers agree.</p>
<p>Two things here:</p>
<ol>
<li>Apple has a history of disparaging products and markets right before they unveil their own. So it&#8217;s not unreasonable for analysts to keep asking about the prospects for a supercheap Mac laptop. But Apple really is emphatic about its distaste for these machines.</li>
<li>Apple is not ruling some sort of device that&#8217;s more expensive than a netbook and less expensive than a $999 MacBook&#8230;and may have a big touchscreen&#8230;and is bigger than an iPhone, etc. Something, perhaps, like an <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090713/800-apple-tablet-coming-in-october/">$800 iTablet</a>. We&#8217;ll see.</li>
</ol>
<p>EARLIER:</p>
<p>Joining call late; analysis of Q3 results <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090721/aapl-q3/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Reading from prepared statement:</p>
<ul>
<li>Eight billion songs purchased and downloaded from iTunes store.</li>
<li>Slight uptick at Mac retail stores. 50 percent of Macs sold at stores to customers who didn&#8217;t own Macs before. 258 stores. 27 store remodels.</li>
<li>Gross-margin improvement: Component cost increase not as high as expected; weaker U.S. dollar helped.</li>
<li>Cash pile: Will be invested in short-term investments. First week of Q4, made $500 million payment to Toshiba for future supply of NAND flash memory.</li>
</ul>
<p>Q&amp;A:</p>
<ul>
<li>Please talk about your relationship with wireless carriers (i.e., when will you dump AT&amp;T (T) for Verizon (VZ). Tim Cook: &#8220;I think that most of the carriers we&#8217;re doing business with are thrilled with lower churn&#8230;and, of course, their customers are demanding the iPhone.&#8221; Do you see opportunity beyond the iPhone, like data plans for laptops with AT&amp;T? &#8220;Nothing to be announced today.&#8221; How&#8217;s your relationship with AT&amp;T? &#8220;I think it&#8217;s an excellent relationship and we&#8217;re very happy with it.&#8221;</li>
<li>Discussion of education and professional market for Mac laptops/PCs&#8211;both affected by economy more than consumer market, i.e., schools and corporations are less likely to spring for shiny new Macs than Joe Sixpack.</li>
<li>How is the $99 iPhone performing? As we made changes&#8211;launch of 3Gs and lower-priced iPhones&#8211;we saw acceleration of unit sales. But won&#8217;t break down mix. Supply of phones has been &#8220;constrained&#8221; and demand is robust. Opportunity for enterprise sale? Big opportunity. Doing well with small business, and with big corporations and agencies where employees can purchase for themselves.</li>
<li>Guidance details? No change in thinking regarding guidance offerings. We usually see an increase in Mac units from June to September, but we think the sequential increase will be less than in previous years since we&#8217;ve refreshed our lines a while back. Also, education sales are &#8220;under pressure from budget shortfalls.&#8221; Same thing with the iPod: We think we&#8217;ll see a decline for regular players but an increase for the iPod touch. Seasonality makes projections a little funky this time around given timing of product launches.</li>
<li>Channel inventory for iPhone lower is than we would like; there are 1.83 million phones in inventory.</li>
<li>Given the $999 MacBook and price cuts for the Mac line, is the MacBook more or less elastic than anticipated? As we expected, some people are now buying up, because they can get the Macbook Pro for $1,199, down from $1,899. &#8220;We&#8217;re not thinking fundamentally different about the Mac business than we were before.&#8221; If we can build great Macs at lower prices, we will, but we won&#8217;t put the Mac brand on products that aren&#8217;t up to our standards.</li>
<li>Update on Snow Leopard? Why such a low price point? Snow Leopard is priced aggressively so that all our users can upgrade to it, and we expect that they will. What commodity prices are you worried about, what should we think of the Toshiba prebuy? Are others coming? The market for DRAM and large-size LCDs has &#8220;shifted to constrained environment&#8221; and prices have moved accordingly. The NAND supply is getting better. We have a long-term supply agreement with Toshiba. We view flash as key component because we use it in so many products, and we&#8217;re a big consumer on a worldwide basis. We&#8217;re always open to similar deals. We&#8217;ve done one with LG on LCDs. We may do others, but we&#8217;re not working on one now.</li>
<li>Please talk more about consumer demand for lower-priced laptops. No details forthcoming. But on macro level: Once price changes, people are upsold from $999 unit to $1,199 unit. [We just heard that.] Prior to change, we had seen people leaning toward the $999 product. What about pricing on iPhone side? Sounds like $99 3G iPhone helped drive traffic to the $199 3GS iPhone. Was that the plan? We&#8217;re focused on total iPhone units. So we&#8217;re psyched about 5.2M iPhones sold. Also, take note that the 3GS is in short supply and not available in all territories. Also, early in cycle, you have more upgraders, and upgraders are more likely to get higher priced phones. Still, too early to tell about product mix.</li>
<li>Competitors are now finally coming out with rival app stores&#8211;Pre (barely), BlackBerry, etc.). What are you up to in answering back? Well, we just launched OS 3.0. That&#8217;s pretty great. It has an Installed base of 45 million (iPhones and iPod touch). We have a gazillion apps. According to the latest numbers from Nokia (NOK) and RIM (RIMM), they have a couple thousand each; Android has maybe 5,000. &#8220;We feel extremely good about our competitive position and continue to believe that we&#8217;re light years ahead of other people.&#8221;</li>
<li>What about getting into the low-priced/netbook category? Tim Cook: &#8220;Our goal is not to build the most computers, it&#8217;s to build the best. Whatever price point we can build the best in, we will play there. At this point, we don&#8217;t see a way to build a great product at that price point, $399, $499.&#8221; We think many customers buying those find themselves &#8220;disenchanted&#8221; after buying cheapo/netbooks.</li>
<li>Is the carrier network strong enough to handle all the apps and the more robust apps you&#8217;re coming out with every day? Non-answer. Do you think you guys will make investments on the side to take pressure of carrier-capacity issues? No plans. When we entered business, we looked at it, decided what we could do well was deliver the handset. I think there are other people that have more skills in the network area, and I think we have a lot of those partners.</li>
<li>Back to netbooks and things like netbooks, but better, like the iTablet: Do you think there is an emerging market for a &#8220;truly mobile device&#8221; with a larger screen, a market big enough that you may want to participate? Cook: &#8220;Never want to discount anything in the future,&#8221; and never want to answer specifically your question about new products. [Duh.] But, boy, do we think netbooks are lousy and we think customers agree.</li>
<li>Any info on iPhone sales split between new buyers and upgrades? Nope. Okay, how about the app store? It looks like prices are in a &#8220;race to the bottom&#8221;; there are lots of 99 cent apps. Are you worried about that? And can you help customers distinguish between good ones and &#8220;garbage&#8221;? Cook: &#8220;We realize there&#8217;s further opportunity for improvement&#8221; regarding promoting quality apps, etc. Regarding price: It&#8217;s up to the developers. As the installed base grows, it makes more sense to have lower prices, but that&#8217;s up to the developers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Call finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090721/live-apple-q3-earnings-call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PC Makers Bracing for Back-to-Cruel Season</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090518/pc-makers-bracing-for-back-to-cruel-season/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090518/pc-makers-bracing-for-back-to-cruel-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory correction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JP Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Moskowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC vendors hoping for a sooner-than-expected recovery later this year best prepare themselves for disappointment. No quick recovery is likely, according to J.P. Morgan analyst Mark Moskowitz, who says the PC market will remain in a shambles throughout 2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/05/wile-e-coyotefallingjpg-150x150.jpg" alt="wile-e-coyotefallingjpg" title="wile-e-coyotefallingjpg" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-17832" />PC vendors hoping for a sooner-than-expected recovery later this year best prepare themselves for disappointment. No quick recovery is likely, according to J.P. Morgan analyst Mark Moskowitz, who says the PC market will remain in a shambles throughout 2009. He expects PC unit sales to decline 9.9 percent for the year and revenue for the industry to fall by more than 21 percent from 2008.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are preparing for a [second-half] letdown in PCs,&#8221; Moskowitz wrote in a research note to clients. &#8220;While our revised unit growth estimates are edging up, our draconian revenue outlook remains unchanged. We continue to model sub-seasonal sequential trends for the second half of the year.&#8221; Demand, he adds, will continue to be slow, and the coming launch of Microsoft’s (MSFT) Windows 7 OS will be no panacea. &#8220;So far in the June quarter, our conversations with industry contacts suggest that PC end demand remains soft, and there are increasing concerns of another inventory correction across the food chain if suppliers continue to target normal seasonality in the second half of the year&#8230;.We have not seen a major PC upgrade cycle related to an operating system launch since 1995, and we do not expect anything different with Windows 7.”</p>
<p>Back in March <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090302/pc-sales-crashing-like-an-unpatched-windows-machine/">Gartner predicted that the PC industry would see its sharpest unit decline in history in 2009</a>. Sadly, Moskowitz’s note would seem to bear that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090518/pc-makers-bracing-for-back-to-cruel-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRC Mulling &quot;One-iPhone Policy&quot;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090330/prc-mulling-one-iphone-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090330/prc-mulling-one-iphone-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Unicom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gray market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penetration rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prospects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=15597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Apple is indeed preparing to offer the iPhone 3G in China in partnership with China Unicom, its sales prospects are looking pretty damn good. Bank of America analyst Scott Craig believes the company could claim as much as a fifth of the smartphone market in China when it launches the device there--and in relatively short order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/02/iphone_100unlock.jpg" alt="" title="iphone_100unlock" width="200" height="181" class="alignright size-full wp-image-12755" /></p>
<p>If Apple is indeed preparing to <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?NewsID=25511">offer the iPhone 3G in China in partnership with China Unicom</a>, its sales prospects are looking pretty damn good. Bank of America analyst Scott Craig believes the company could claim as much as a fifth of the smartphone market in China when it launches the device there&#8211;and in relatively short order. “Our Asia supply chain checks seem to indicate that Apple believes it can achieve an initial penetration rate, least on a sell-in basis, similar to the iPhone launch in the U.S. (about 20 percent),” Craig wrote in a recent research note. “In fact, given our channel checks in Asia, Apple likely believes it can easily meet (and likely exceed) this and/or believes in other scenarios that result in much higher unit sales levels.”</p>
<p>Craig estimates that Apple (AAPL) can sell 1.5 million iPhones in China in calendar 2009, assuming a midyear release and a price-point of $500-$600. He sees the company selling a further 4.6 million in calendar 2010, and 5.8 million in calendar 2011. That&#8217;s a hell of a lot of iPhones. But given<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080926/is-the-victorian-mourning-garb-really-necessary-steve-hong-kongs-pretty-warm-this-time-of-year/"> the strong gray market interest</a> in China already and the fact that China Unicom&#8217;s customer base at 150 million is roughly twice the size of AT&#038;T Wireless, it doesn&#8217;t seem like all that much of a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090330/prc-mulling-one-iphone-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRC Mulling "One-iPhone Policy"</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090330/prc-mulling-one-iphone-policy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090330/prc-mulling-one-iphone-policy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Unicom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gray market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penetration rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prospects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=15597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Apple is indeed preparing to offer the iPhone 3G in China in partnership with China Unicom, its sales prospects are looking pretty damn good. Bank of America analyst Scott Craig believes the company could claim as much as a fifth of the smartphone market in China when it launches the device there--and in relatively short order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/02/iphone_100unlock.jpg" alt="" title="iphone_100unlock" width="200" height="181" class="alignright size-full wp-image-12755" /></p>
<p>If Apple is indeed preparing to <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?NewsID=25511">offer the iPhone 3G in China in partnership with China Unicom</a>, its sales prospects are looking pretty damn good. Bank of America analyst Scott Craig believes the company could claim as much as a fifth of the smartphone market in China when it launches the device there&#8211;and in relatively short order. “Our Asia supply chain checks seem to indicate that Apple believes it can achieve an initial penetration rate, least on a sell-in basis, similar to the iPhone launch in the U.S. (about 20 percent),” Craig wrote in a recent research note. “In fact, given our channel checks in Asia, Apple likely believes it can easily meet (and likely exceed) this and/or believes in other scenarios that result in much higher unit sales levels.”</p>
<p>Craig estimates that Apple (AAPL) can sell 1.5 million iPhones in China in calendar 2009, assuming a midyear release and a price-point of $500-$600. He sees the company selling a further 4.6 million in calendar 2010, and 5.8 million in calendar 2011. That&#8217;s a hell of a lot of iPhones. But given<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080926/is-the-victorian-mourning-garb-really-necessary-steve-hong-kongs-pretty-warm-this-time-of-year/"> the strong gray market interest</a> in China already and the fact that China Unicom&#8217;s customer base at 150 million is roughly twice the size of AT&#038;T Wireless, it doesn&#8217;t seem like all that much of a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090330/prc-mulling-one-iphone-policy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Wow Starts Now &#8230; at Apple</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081015/vista-wow-starts-now-at-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081015/vista-wow-starts-now-at-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor shipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there was any comic relief during Tuesday’s Apple event, it was provided by Microsoft, which played Curly to CEO Steve Jobs’s Moe and COO Tim Cook’s Larry. Discussing the dramatic increase in the Mac’s market share in the past year, Cook said it was driven partially by “something we didn’t do: Vista.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When I look at this, it sends shivers up my spine.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Apple COO Tim Cook demonstrates a new MacBook running Windows</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/cook_windows.jpg" alt="" title="cook_windows" width="200" height="178" style="border: 1px solid #000;" class="alignright size-full wp-image-6812" />If there was any comic relief during Tuesday&#8217;s Apple event, it was provided by Microsoft (MSFT), which played Curly to CEO Steve Jobs&#8217;s Moe and COO Tim Cook&#8217;s Larry. Discussing the dramatic increase in the Mac&#8217;s market share in the past year, Cook said it was driven partially by &#8220;something we didn&#8217;t do: Vista.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s fair to say that Vista hasn&#8217;t lived up to everything that Microsoft hoped it would,&#8221; Cook said. &#8220;And consequently, it&#8217;s opened doors for a lot of people to consider switching to the Mac. And Apple has been the beneficiary of this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Recognize misfortune for what it is: an opportunity to lift yourself to a higher level, eh, Tim?</p>
<p>Anyway, according to Cook, 50 percent of all new Macs sold are purchased by switchers. Moreover, the Mac has outgrown the market for 14 of the last 15 quarters. That&#8217;s nearly four years. &#8220;The Macintosh represents 17.6 percent of all unit sales in U.S. retail,&#8221; said Cook. &#8220;That means one out of every three dollars spent on computers in U.S. retail is spent on the Mac.&#8221;</p>
<p>A remarkable point. And one seemingly borne out by <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=777613">the latest PC vendor shipment numbers from Gartner</a> (IT) (<em>click on chart below</em>).  Apple (AAPL) showed nearly 30 percent year-over-year growth in the third quarter, its market share rising to 9.5 percent from 7.7 percent.</p>
<p><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/gartner_q308_pc_ship.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/gartner_q308_pc_ship-300x103.jpg" alt="" title="gartner_q308_pc_ship" width="300" height="103" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-6815" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081015/vista-wow-starts-now-at-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

