<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; vendor lock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/vendor-lock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Sun to Oracle Customers: Reduce Costs and Eliminate Vendor Lock-In! Oh&#8230;Wait&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090611/sun-to-oracle-customers-reduce-costs-and-eliminate-vendor-lock-in-oh-wait/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090611/sun-to-oracle-customers-reduce-costs-and-eliminate-vendor-lock-in-oh-wait/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaOne conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perpetual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott McNealy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vendor lock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebLogic Suite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=19338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To hear tell from Sun executives, the company’s impending acquisition by Oracle will be of great benefit to Sun, its technology and its customers. “Is this Oracle thing a good thing for Java?” Sun chairman Scott McNealy asked last week at the company’s JavaOne conference. “And is it a…good thing for the community, and all the rest of it?…It’s absolutely a good thing.” Thing is, this wasn’t always Sun’s opinion. In fact, the company’s touting of the benefits of the Oracle acquisition is, dare I say, a tad ironic given its preacquisition opinion of Oracle’s prices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To hear tell from Sun executives, the company’s impending acquisition by Oracle will be of great benefit to Sun, its technology and its customers. “Is this Oracle thing a good thing for Java?” <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1341439/000119312509123725/dex991.htm">Sun chairman Scott McNealy asked last week at the company’s JavaOne conference</a>. “And is it a&#8230;good thing for the community, and all the rest of it? It’s absolutely a good thing.”</p>
<p></em>Of course it is.</em>  The combination of Oracle (ORCL) and Sun (JAVA) will result in more interesting and viable solutions! The market will thrive! The customer will benefit from greater choice and flexibility!</p>
<p>“It’s absolutely a good thing.”</p>
<p>And more so now than ever since the Department of Justice is said to be finalizing its clearance decision of the companies’ deal any day now, right?</p>
<p>Right!</p>
<p>Thing is, this wasn’t always Sun’s opinion. In fact, the company’s touting of the benefits of the Oracle acquisition is, dare I say, a tad ironic given its preacquisition opinion of Oracle’s prices. Consider this <a href="http://www.sun.com/software/javaenterprisesystem/javacaps/logic.jsp">handy calculator</a> Sun built to show potential customers how much they could save by going with Sun&#8217;s SOA platform over Oracle&#8217;s WebLogic Suite (click on the image below).<br />
<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/sun-oracle-calc.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/sun-oracle-calc-250x260.jpg" alt="sun-oracle-calc" title="sun-oracle-calc" width="250" height="260" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-19336" /></a></p>
<p>$8,610,000 for Oracle Fusion? $2,200,00 for Sun SOA Perpetual? Why the choice is clear: Sun, ALL THE WAY. “Oracle WebLogic Customers&#8211;Reduce Costs and Eliminate Vendor Lock-in with this limited time offer,” Sun shouts from the page.</p>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/06/vendorlockin.jpg" alt="vendorlockin" title="vendorlockin" width="350" height="179" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19337" /></p>
<p><em>Eliminate Vendor Lock-in.</em></p>
<p>Heh. Act now before the DOJ clears the merger&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090611/sun-to-oracle-customers-reduce-costs-and-eliminate-vendor-lock-in-oh-wait/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

