<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; versions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/versions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Security Software, Taxes and Wi-Fi for iPads</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110202/security-software-taxes-and-wi-fi-for-ipads/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110202/security-software-taxes-and-wi-fi-for-ipads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walt Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mossberg's Mailbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Tablet Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Security Essentials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mailbox.allthingsd.com/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt answers readers' questions on security software, a computer for preparing taxes and Wi-Fi for iPads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="mailbox-q">Q:</p>
<p class="mailbox-question"><em> I have a Windows PC. Microsoft sends regular updates to their &#8220;computer protection&#8221; software. Do I still need other security software?</em></p>
<p class="mailbox-a">A:</p>
<p> It depends what you mean by &#8220;computer protection&#8221; software. </p>
<p>If you are using Microsoft Security Essentials, then you already have security software and don&#8217;t need another brand, unless you are unhappy with it. </p>
<p>If you are referring to general security updates to Windows, these do close vulnerabilities in Windows, but don&#8217;t obviate the need for security software.</p>
<p class="mailbox-q">Q:</p>
<p class="mailbox-question"><em> I&#8217;m an accountant and do a few tax returns for my clients in my spare time. Would you please give me some recommendations on a computer that I could use for preparing tax returns and filing them electronically?</em></p>
<p class="mailbox-a">A:</p>
<p> While preparing tax returns might require some skill on your part, it doesn&#8217;t require an especially powerful computer, or one configured in any particular manner. Pretty much any PC or Mac on the shelves can do it. </p>
<p>If you have a favorite tax software program, perhaps one geared more to accountants than to average consumers, you might check its system requirements and be guided by these. </p>
<p>For instance, if it runs on only certain versions of Windows, or requires a certain amount of memory, you should buy accordingly.</p>
<p class="mailbox-q">Q:</p>
<p class="mailbox-question"><em> We have two new iPads, the models with only Wi-Fi connectivity. Can I use the Wi-Fi hot-spot feature of an Android phone to provide them with Internet access?</em></p>
<p class="mailbox-a">A:</p>
<p> Although I haven&#8217;t tested this scenario, I see no reason why not. </p>
<p>The hot-spot feature creates a Wi-Fi network from a cellular data connection and should work with any Wi-Fi capable device, including your iPads.</p>
<p class="tagline">You can find Mossberg&#8217;s Mailbox and all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s other columns online at the All Things Digital website, http://walt.allthingsd.com. Write to Walt at mossberg@wsj.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110202/security-software-taxes-and-wi-fi-for-ipads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay Up: The Wall Street Journal Tries Charging Web Subscribers for Mobile Access</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090917/pay-up-wall-street-journal-tries-charging-web-subscribers-for-mobile-access/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090917/pay-up-wall-street-journal-tries-charging-web-subscribers-for-mobile-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kafka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaMemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paidContent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kafka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/?p=11070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch has been pushing The Wall Street Journal to raise its prices. Here's one way to try it: Levy an additional fee for subscribers who want to use the paper's iPhone or BlackBerry apps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/rupert-murdoch.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-452" title="rupert-murdoch" src="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/files/2008/11/rupert-murdoch.jpg" alt="rupert-murdoch" width="150" height="150" /></a>How on earth does The Wall Street Journal expect its subscribers to pay an additional fee to read the newspaper on a mobile phone?</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t. Except when it does.</p>
<p>Contrary to News Corp. (NWS) CEO <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=rupert%20murdoch%20paid%20content%20paid%20app%20wsj&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wn">Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s comments earlier in the week</a>, Dow Jones will not be charging customers who subscribe to both its Web and print versions a weekly fee to read the paper on its iPhone or BlackBerry apps.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re only subscribing to one version? That&#8217;ll be a buck a week, starting Oct. 24. The Journal will also start charging mobile-only users $2 a week, which is essentially the same price as a Web-only subscription.</p>
<p>That second charge makes some sense to me. The Journal has always said that it would start charging for the apps it makes for Apple&#8217;s (AAPL) and Research in Motion&#8217;s (RIMM) handsets. Right now these apps are gratis, which means you can either pay the Journal to read it in print or on the Web, or read it on your iPhone and pay zilch. That had to change at some point.</p>
<p>But while I have to be a tiny bit delicate here&#8211;Dow Jones owns this Web site, and I still have some aversion to insulting my employers in public&#8211;I don&#8217;t see how dunking paying customers a second time makes sense.</p>
<p>I do understand some of the impulse. Publishers of all stripes seem to think that while charging for content on the Web is tough, people are happy to pay for something delivered wirelessly. I think that <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090910/time-inc-pines-for-a-kindle-killer-if-someone-else-builds-it/">many publishers are going to be very disappointed when they try this out in practice</a>, but that&#8217;s another story.</p>
<p>And I also know that News Corp. has steadily been pushing Dow Jones to raise its subscription prices for the WSJ since it acquired the company, and this strategy sort of dovetails with that.</p>
<p>But seems to me that if I am paying for information, I will expect to consume it wherever I am, at the same price. And you&#8217;re starting to hear some publishers say the same thing&#8211;see Variety&#8217;s comments about subscription plans today in <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-hollywood-trade-mags-variety-thr-look-to-build-online-paywalls/">PaidContent</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t actually pay for my WSJ subscription; my employers, who, I should stress, are truly excellent people, have hooked me up&#8211;so maybe I&#8217;ve got this wrong. Or maybe it&#8217;s merely a marketing issue: If you jack up my WSJ subscription and tell me you&#8217;re throwing in access to the mobile app for free, I might be okay with it.</p>
<p>But tell me you&#8217;re charging me an additional fee to read it on the go and it will stick in my craw. Let&#8217;s see if the paper&#8217;s paying subscribers feel the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090917/pay-up-wall-street-journal-tries-charging-web-subscribers-for-mobile-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Inks Chinese iPhone Deal</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090828/apple-inks-chinese-iphone-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090828/apple-inks-chinese-iphone-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bellwether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Unicom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chipsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Daily Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notices of inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth in billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=23923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=1E8942F8-7319-4A79-A1CE-5AFEA5A1100C&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1E8942F8-7319-4A79-A1CE-5AFEA5A1100C}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090828/apple-inks-chinese-iphone-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deciphering Windows 7 Upgrades: The Official Chart</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/deciphering-windows-7-upgrades-the-official-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/deciphering-windows-7-upgrades-the-official-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walt Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mossblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easy Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[external drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-place upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7 Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mossblog.allthingsd.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past two weeks, I've explained some of the challenges and limitations that will be involved in upgrading an existing Windows XP or Windows Vista PC to the forthcoming Windows 7 operating system, due out October 22. Several readers asked me to publish a chart showing which current versions of Windows could be easily upgraded to which planned versions of Windows 7, and which couldn't.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past two weeks, in my Personal Technology columns, <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090722/for-some-move-to-windows-7-will-be-tough/">here</a> and <a href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090729/hasta-la-vista-the-many-versions-of-windows-7/">here</a>, I&#8217;ve explained some of the challenges and limitations that will be involved in upgrading an existing Windows XP or Windows Vista PC to the forthcoming Windows 7 operating system, due out October 22. Several readers asked me to publish a chart showing which current versions of Windows could be easily upgraded to which planned versions of Windows 7, and which couldn&#8217;t. So I asked Microsoft (MSFT) to supply such a chart we could publish, and the company graciously did so. It is reproduced below, unaltered. You can click on it to make it larger.</p>
<p><a href="http://mossblog.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/windows-upgrade-chart.png" title="Windows 7 Upgrade Chart"><img src="http://mossblog.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/windows-upgrade-chart-219x300.png" alt="Windows 7 Upgrade Chart" title="Windows 7 Upgrade Chart" width="219" height="300" class="alignright photo size-medium wp-image-346" /></a></p>
<p>Common consumer versions of XP and Vista are listed down the side, and the three (out of a total of six) planned versions of Windows 7 likeliest to be used by average consumers on existing PCs are listed across the top. </p>
<p>Note that ONLY those combinations that intersect in a green box saying &#8220;In-Place Upgrade&#8221; can be upgraded in a simple way that, in Microsoft&#8217;s words, &#8220;Keeps your files, settings, and programs intact from your current version of Windows.&#8221; </p>
<p>All of the others, denoted by blue boxes, will require what Microsoft calls a &#8220;Custom Install,&#8221; also known as a &#8220;clean install&#8221;&#8211;a procedure Microsoft doesn&#8217;t even refer to as an &#8220;upgrade.&#8221; For most average, nontechie consumers whose PCs have a single hard disk, that will require a tedious, painful process with the following steps: Temporarily relocating your personal files to an external drive or other computer, wiping your hard drive clean, then installing Windows 7, then moving your personal files back, then re-installing all of your programs from their original disks or download files, then reinstalling all of their updates and patches that may have been issued since the original installation files were released.</p>
<p>Microsoft will provide a free &#8220;Easy Transfer&#8221; program to assist in this process, but this software won&#8217;t transfer your programs, only your personal files and settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090804/deciphering-windows-7-upgrades-the-official-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can Almost Hear the Shrieks of Outrage in Cupertino, Can&#039;t You?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/you-can-almost-hear-the-shrieks-of-outrage-in-cupertino-cant-you/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/you-can-almost-hear-the-shrieks-of-outrage-in-cupertino-cant-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cupertino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes 8.2.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre Media Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB Implementers Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendor ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webOS 1.1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Devices “falsely pretending to be iPods” can once again sync with iTunes, whether Apple likes it or not. Palm this evening released an update to the Pre’s webOS operating system that restores the iTunes syncing ability that its Cupertino rival disabled only last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;iTunes 8.2.1 disables devices falsely pretending to be iPods, including the Palm Pre. As we’ve said before, newer versions of Apple’s iTunes software may no longer provide syncing functionality with unsupported digital media players.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/itunes-821-fixes-pres-syncing-ability/"> Apple, July 15, 2009</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, and one more thing: Palm webOS 1.1 re-enables Palm media sync. That’s right&#8211;you once again can have seamless access to your music, photos and videos from the current version of iTunes (8.2.1).&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://blog.palm.com/palm/2009/07/palm-webos-11-enhances-support-for-enterprise-and-beyond.html">Palm, July 23, 2009</a></p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/jobswpredie.jpg" alt="jobswpredie" title="jobswpredie" width="260" height="201" class="alignright size-full wp-image-22050" />Devices “falsely pretending to be iPods” can once again sync with iTunes, whether Apple (AAPL) likes it or not.</p>
<p>Palm (PALM) this evening released an <a href="http://blog.palm.com/palm/2009/07/palm-webos-11-enhances-support-for-enterprise-and-beyond.html">update to the Pre’s  webOS operating system</a> that restores the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/itunes-821-fixes-pres-syncing-ability/">iTunes syncing ability disabled by its Cupertino rival</a> only last week.</p>
<p>&#8220;Palm has released webOS 1.1, which, along with offering more robust EAS support for business users, re-enables Palm media sync,&#8221; said company spokesperson Lynn Fox. &#8220;Palm believes that openness and interoperability offer better experiences for users by allowing them the freedom to use the content they own without interference across devices and services, so on behalf of consumers, we have notified the USB Implementers Forum of what we believe is improper use of the Vendor ID number by another member.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;oh, and one more thing&#8221; was a nice touch. But let&#8217;s face it, nothing can come of this but ugliness&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/you-can-almost-hear-the-shrieks-of-outrage-in-cupertino-cant-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can Almost Hear the Shrieks of Outrage in Cupertino, Can't You?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/you-can-almost-hear-the-shrieks-of-outrage-in-cupertino-cant-you-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/you-can-almost-hear-the-shrieks-of-outrage-in-cupertino-cant-you-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cupertino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes 8.2.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre Media Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB Implementers Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendor ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webOS 1.1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=22038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Devices “falsely pretending to be iPods” can once again sync with iTunes, whether Apple likes it or not. Palm this evening released an update to the Pre’s webOS operating system that restores the iTunes syncing ability that its Cupertino rival disabled only last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;iTunes 8.2.1 disables devices falsely pretending to be iPods, including the Palm Pre. As we’ve said before, newer versions of Apple’s iTunes software may no longer provide syncing functionality with unsupported digital media players.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/itunes-821-fixes-pres-syncing-ability/"> Apple, July 15, 2009</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, and one more thing: Palm webOS 1.1 re-enables Palm media sync. That’s right&#8211;you once again can have seamless access to your music, photos and videos from the current version of iTunes (8.2.1).&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://blog.palm.com/palm/2009/07/palm-webos-11-enhances-support-for-enterprise-and-beyond.html">Palm, July 23, 2009</a></p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/jobswpredie.jpg" alt="jobswpredie" title="jobswpredie" width="260" height="201" class="alignright size-full wp-image-22050" />Devices “falsely pretending to be iPods” can once again sync with iTunes, whether Apple (AAPL) likes it or not. </p>
<p>Palm (PALM) this evening released an <a href="http://blog.palm.com/palm/2009/07/palm-webos-11-enhances-support-for-enterprise-and-beyond.html">update to the Pre’s  webOS operating system</a> that restores the <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090715/itunes-821-fixes-pres-syncing-ability/">iTunes syncing ability disabled by its Cupertino rival</a> only last week.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Palm has released webOS 1.1, which, along with offering more robust EAS support for business users, re-enables Palm media sync,&#8221; said company spokesperson Lynn Fox. &#8220;Palm believes that openness and interoperability offer better experiences for users by allowing them the freedom to use the content they own without interference across devices and services, so on behalf of consumers, we have notified the USB Implementers Forum of what we believe is improper use of the Vendor ID number by another member.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;oh, and one more thing&#8221; was a nice touch. But let&#8217;s face it, nothing can come of this but ugliness&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090723/you-can-almost-hear-the-shrieks-of-outrage-in-cupertino-cant-you-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista: Sometimes I Wish I&#039;d Never Been Born [UPDATED]</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090504/vista-sometimes-i-wish-id-never-been-born/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090504/vista-sometimes-i-wish-id-never-been-born/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Francis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Client Business Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the marketplace has abandoned Vista, is Microsoft making preparations to abandon it as well? Earlier today, a Microsoft executive suggested that might be the case, hinting that the company could be planning to ditch Vista soon after Windows 7 ships.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/06/donotwant.jpg" alt="" title="donotwant" width="350" height="280" class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" /></p>
<p>Now that the marketplace has abandoned Vista, is Microsoft making preparations to abandon it as well? Earlier today, a Microsoft executive <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;articleId=9132498">suggested that might be the case</a>, hinting that the company could be planning to ditch Vista soon after Windows 7 ships. &#8220;We are still not sure if [computer makers] will be able to ship Vista once Windows 7 is made available,” Richard Francis, general manager and Windows Client Business Group lead at Microsoft Asia-Pacific, told IDG, adding that support for all versions of Vista will end in April of 2012.</p>
<p>An interesting disclosure given that Microsoft (MSFT) hasn’t yet detailed official plans for Vista, post-Windows 7. With the poor reception the OS has received in the market and Microsoft’s efforts to redeem itself with Windows 7, it certainly wouldn’t be surprising if the company wanted to remove Vista from the shelves as soon as Windows 7 arrives. Then again, it wouldn’t be all that surprising if Microsoft left the Vista packages there for a while&#8211;tucked away behind some copies of Windows XP, of course.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Responding to my request for comment, Microsoft said that there is no hard and fast date end-of-sale date for Vista. The company noted, however, that OEMs will have the option to pre-install and retailers will be able to sell whatever versions of Windows they choose until that date is reached. Microsoft&#8217;s statement in full, below:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
We have not made any final end of sale decisions for Windows Vista.</p>
<p>Microsoft Support Lifecycle policy provides a minimum of 10 years of support for Business and Developer products.  Mainstream support for these business and enterprise versions of Windows Vista will be provided for five years, or for two years after the successor product is released, whichever is longer.  Currently, Mainstream Support for these products is scheduled to end on April 10, 2012.</p>
<p>For Consumer products, including consumer versions of Windows Vista Ultimate, Home Basic and Home Premium, Microsoft will offer Mainstream Support for either a minimum of five years from the date of a product&#8217;s general availability, or for two years after the successor product is released, whichever is longer. Extended Support is not available for Consumer, Hardware, and Multimedia products.  Most of these products will also receive at least eight years of online self-help support.</p>
<p>During Mainstream Support, customers have access to no charge and paid support, security updates and non-security hotfixes.  Extended Support for business and developer products will be available until April 11, 2017.  During Extended Support at a supported service pack level, customers can access paid support, security updates and online self-help.  Non-security hotfixes are available to customers who enroll in the Extended Hotfix Support program within 90 days of the product entering Extended Support.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090504/vista-sometimes-i-wish-id-never-been-born/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista: Sometimes I Wish I'd Never Been Born [UPDATED]</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090504/vista-sometimes-i-wish-id-never-been-born-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090504/vista-sometimes-i-wish-id-never-been-born-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 22:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Francis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Client Business Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=16874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the marketplace has abandoned Vista, is Microsoft making preparations to abandon it as well? Earlier today, a Microsoft executive suggested that might be the case, hinting that the company could be planning to ditch Vista soon after Windows 7 ships.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/06/donotwant.jpg" alt="" title="donotwant" width="350" height="280" class='centered' style="border: 1px solid #000;" /></p>
<p>Now that the marketplace has abandoned Vista, is Microsoft making preparations to abandon it as well? Earlier today, a Microsoft executive <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;articleId=9132498">suggested that might be the case</a>, hinting that the company could be planning to ditch Vista soon after Windows 7 ships. &#8220;We are still not sure if [computer makers] will be able to ship Vista once Windows 7 is made available,” Richard Francis, general manager and Windows Client Business Group lead at Microsoft Asia-Pacific, told IDG, adding that support for all versions of Vista will end in April of 2012.</p>
<p>An interesting disclosure given that Microsoft (MSFT) hasn’t yet detailed official plans for Vista, post-Windows 7. With the poor reception the OS has received in the market and Microsoft’s efforts to redeem itself with Windows 7, it certainly wouldn’t be surprising if the company wanted to remove Vista from the shelves as soon as Windows 7 arrives. Then again, it wouldn’t be all that surprising if Microsoft left the Vista packages there for a while&#8211;tucked away behind some copies of Windows XP, of course.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Responding to my request for comment, Microsoft said that there is no hard and fast date end-of-sale date for Vista. The company noted, however, that OEMs will have the option to pre-install and retailers will be able to sell whatever versions of Windows they choose until that date is reached. Microsoft&#8217;s statement in full, below:</p>
<blockquote class="memo"><p>
We have not made any final end of sale decisions for Windows Vista.</p>
<p>Microsoft Support Lifecycle policy provides a minimum of 10 years of support for Business and Developer products.  Mainstream support for these business and enterprise versions of Windows Vista will be provided for five years, or for two years after the successor product is released, whichever is longer.  Currently, Mainstream Support for these products is scheduled to end on April 10, 2012.</p>
<p>For Consumer products, including consumer versions of Windows Vista Ultimate, Home Basic and Home Premium, Microsoft will offer Mainstream Support for either a minimum of five years from the date of a product&#8217;s general availability, or for two years after the successor product is released, whichever is longer. Extended Support is not available for Consumer, Hardware, and Multimedia products.  Most of these products will also receive at least eight years of online self-help support.</p>
<p>During Mainstream Support, customers have access to no charge and paid support, security updates and non-security hotfixes.  Extended Support for business and developer products will be available until April 11, 2017.  During Extended Support at a supported service pack level, customers can access paid support, security updates and online self-help.  Non-security hotfixes are available to customers who enroll in the Extended Hotfix Support program within 90 days of the product entering Extended Support.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090504/vista-sometimes-i-wish-id-never-been-born-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

