Aspen Photo / Shutterstock.com

1.) ESPN’s Cunning Plan to Stream March Madness: Head to Bill Simmons’s House

2.) Foursquare’s Yelp Problem

3.) BlackBerry CEO Says iPhone Is Passé

4.) Seven Questions for the Man Shaking Up HP’s Operations, John Hinshaw

5.) Samsung Galaxy S4: Bigger Display and Bolder Software — But Is It Better Enough?

6.) Hey, Remember How Awesome the iPhone Is?

7.) Looking East to Predict the Next Billion-Dollar Mobile Company

8.) Jerry Yang Is Back (And Investing More Than Ever)

9.) Global Platform Head Carroll Departs Yahoo for Go Daddy, While Yahoo News Head Leaves for NBC

10.) Mossberg on Apple’s Rivalry With Samsung and Why the iPhone Is Like Switzerland

For more of the week in review, please follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20130317/mossberg-on-apples-rivalry-with-samsung-and-why-the-iphone-is-like-switzerland/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20121207/excited-about-apple-tv-dont-watch-this-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20121207/excited-about-apple-tv-dont-watch-this-video/#comments Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:13:30 +0000 Peter Kafka http://allthingsd.com/?p=276039

Asa Mathat / AllThingsD.com

Lots of Apple watchers listened to Tim Cook’s NBC interview last night and concluded that the company has big plans for the fabled Apple TV.

After all, Cook said TV was an area of “intense interest.”

But that would be bigger news if Cook hadn’t said the same thing back in May, speaking to Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher at our D10 conference.

See for yourself, courtesy of Rich Greenfield and Walt Piecyk, the smart guys at BTIG who mashed up the two interviews:

So what does last night’s interview really mean? Well, it means that Tim Cook is very good at staying on message. But we already knew that. What’s more relevant is what Tim Cook is actually doing.

We know Apple has tried out various permutations of an “Apple TV” product with the Television Industrial Complex in the past — sometimes it’s a programming offering, sometimes it’s a cable box alternative.

But so far, there haven’t been any signs that the company has made any real headway on the content/services side. Until we hear otherwise, hard to get too excited about a couple words.

Marissa Mayer — the typically press-loving Silicon Valley exec who has avoided much media interaction since she took over as CEO of Yahoo — will be doing her first sit-down interview at the end of the month at a Fortune magazine event.

In the chat, according to an invite for a November 27 Silicon Valley dinner for its Most Powerful Women franchise, “she plans to talk about where she is taking Yahoo and what excites her about the future of technology.”

Pull up your chairs, people!

Actually, Mayer has recently spoken most specifically about her plans for the long-troubled company, but it was more formally during Yahoo’s third-quarter earnings call, in which she outlined a mobile-heavy strategy and also a plan to make smaller acquisitions.

“Yahoo will have to be a predominantly mobile company,” she said then to Wall Street analysts, soon after which she bought a tiny mobile start-up called Stamped.

But Mayer has yet to sit down live with a journalist — she had agreed to appear for a sit-down stage interview at a recent TechCrunch Disrupt event, but she opted instead to be a demo judge, where the former Google exec said nothing about her new job at Yahoo.

Mayer will presumably be doing just that with Fortune editor-at-large Pattie Sellers, who helms the high-profile annual Most Powerful Women conference and also the magazine’s list that featured Mayer on the cover this year (see above). Sellers has also just written a profile of Mayer titled “Ready to Rumble at Yahoo,” which did not include her participation but did have quotes from one of her recent hires — Patricia Moll Kriese — at Yahoo.

But Sellers appears to be the only reporter that Mayer has spoken to on the record since she got the job, although her comments in one piece just after she got the job were mostly limited to the topic to her pregnancy. Sellers also announced the name of Mayer’s baby — Macallister — in another recent post.

Presumably, Mayer will talk about her new son with Sellers, but it will be interesting to see what she says about Yahoo, as well as on the future of technology. At an annual Churchill Club gadget event the techie did with Walt Mossberg and me in 2007, Mayer showed off a keyboard whose keys had embedded LCD screens, a wireless rabbit, an alarm clock that can jump off your nightstand and a T-shirt with a wireless signal locator in it.

Here is a video of her in full geek mode talking about that way back when:

Greetings from Manhattan’s Upper East Side, where Google Chairman Eric Schmidt is sitting down for an interview with AllThingsD’s Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher.

The last time these three chatted in public, at the D9 conference in May 2011, they had a wide-ranging conversation, and you should expect the same here.

If I had to guess I’d predict we’ll hear quite a bit about Google’s relationship with Apple, for starters, as well as Schmidt’s take on privacy, politics and the state of the technology business in general.

But we’ll find out right now: I’ll be liveblogging the event below, and you should be able to see a livestream of the event at the top of this post, courtesy of our hosts at the 92nd Street Y.

8:03 pm: Good evening! Looks like the livestream is working, with a delay of a few seconds. Excellent news.

8:05 pm: Some introductory remarks from outgoing Columbia J-School dean Nicholas Lemann.

Walt and Kara are both Columbia grads, hence the connection.

8:09 pm: And we’re off and running.

Disclosure from Kara: She is married to a Google executive. You can read all about that here.

Mossberg: Two years ago we talked to you and you brought up this “Gang of Four” idea. The most influential tech companies. Please expand on that, and update that.

Schmidt: Something unusual has happened. All four companies are networks/platforms generating enormous scale effects. We’ve never had that before: Facebook, Amazon, Apple and Google. All different, all competitors, all making enormous investments.

Swisher: You left out Microsoft:

Schmidt: Deliberate.

Swisher: Still four? What about with Facebook’s troubles?

Schmidt: A billion users is still a really big deal. You can do a lot with that.

Swisher: We talked to AOL’s Tim Armstrong today and he talked about a war between these big platforms.

Schmidt: These companies are all run by smart people. With respect to identity, one of the mistakes we made on the Internet was we never gave you a reliable way to say who you are. Facebook emerged as the best way to do that. But all of the companies will have some form of identity solution.

Mossberg: What Armstrong was getting at more was about these vertical stacks in the cloud: Messaging, content, all this stuff gets tied into one platform or the other. All that stuff is sticky. And Armstrong isn’t running one of those, so what becomes of him?

8:16 pm: Schmidt: Facebook has Facebook Connect, and Google+ is doing something analogous.

(Now a technical discussion of iMap which seems to confuse most people in the room except Schmidt.)

8:17 pm: Mossberg: So you guys all have these different identity systems. Facebook is based on identity …

8:18 pm: Schmidt: The focus shouldn’t be on lock-in for identity, but the huge race for all these other features on the platform. We argue, for instance, that the Chrome browser gives us a huge advantage when it comes to the cloud.

So basically your phone is a front-end for a supercomputer.

(Schmidt now explaining the origins of the word “cloud,” which has to do with whiteboard scribblings.)

8:20 pm: Time to talk about maps. Schmidt: “Apple should have kept our maps.”

Mossberg: But Apple says you didn’t give them all the features they wanted.

Schmidt: “Apple decided a long time ago to do their own maps … [now they've] discovered that maps are really hard.”

Swisher: What argument could you make to Apple to keep your maps?

Schmidt: They’re better maps.

Mossberg: Are you going to make your own iOS map?

Schmidt: Don’t want to pre-announce products, but if we made one, they would have to approve it. … They haven’t approved all of our apps in the past. (Schmidt allows that the two companies are always in communication.)

Mossberg: Why did you keep Microsoft out of the Gang of Four?

Schmidt: They’re a well-run company, but they haven’t been able to bring state-of-the-art products into the fields we’re talking about yet.

8:23 pm: Schmidt: The Android-Apple platform fight is the defining contest. Here’s why: Apple has thousands of developers building for it. Google’s platform, Android, is even larger. Four times more Android phones than Apple phones. 500 million phones already in use. Doing 1.3 million activations a day. We’ll be at 1 billion mobile devices in a year.

Schmidt: We’ve not seen network platform fights at this scale. The beneficiary is you all, the customer, globally. “This is wonderful.”

8:25 pm: Compare this to the PC industry. Phone user population is six billion, one billion smartphone users. Much bigger than the PC industry — maybe a billion, 1.5 billion installed.

Every month, quarter, year, the growth rate of mobile adoption exceeds everyone’s expectations. The phones become so useful that “it’s good enough for normal people” in lieu of a PC, for day-to-day events. Years ago, “people like myself, we missed that.”

8:27 pm: Schmidt: Facebook is attempting to become the world’s communication hub. Off to a good start. Amazon wants to be the world’s store. All of these guys compete, but they also link up in different ways.

8:28 pm: Swisher: But Google is in everyone’s business. There’s Google Play, that’s Amazon. There’s Google+, that’s Facebook.

8:29 pm: Mossberg: All of them overlap but Google overlaps the most.

8:29 pm: Schmidt: We’re trying to solve material problems in the world. Judge us by our solutions. )Schmidt jokes about making a tech news site, but insists Google will “not cross the barrier” of getting into the content business — which would be news to the people in the YouTube world.)

8:30 pm: Now we’re talking about Gangnam style.

8:30 pm: Swisher: One of your former executives, Marissa Mayer, is at Yahoo, which is in the content business. What do you think of that business for her? And do you think you can do a search deal with her?

Schmidt: We’d certainly talk about it if Yahoo wanted to do a search deal. But our last attempt to do that got kiboshed. And I assume they have a “pretty binding” deal with Microsoft.

8:32 pm: Mossberg: The FTC and others are looking at you. Today there’s a story that says they’re now looking at “standards-essential patents,” which if I understand correctly are patents that are so basic that they’re supposed to be licensed to everyone, and the allegation is that Motorola has not been doing that.

8:33 pm: Schmidt. I can’t talk about it because I don’t know the details and “because it actually just gets me too upset.” Patent wars are a disaster for all of us. Everyone can find prior art for everything. So the new trick is to get judges to block devices country by country. It’s bad for innovation, it’s bad for choices.

Schmidt: We are now spending hundreds of millions of dollars to fight these fights against patent trolls, and we’re winning.

Swisher: You’re buying patents, too.

Schmidt: Yes.

8:35 pm: Mossberg: Why did the jury find for Apple?

Schmidt: I don’t know enough about it. I know that Samsung is very upset. … It’s better if I don’t comment on the jury’s decision.

Schmidt: The victims here are not Google and Apple. It’s the little companies that can’t acquire patents to protect themselves.

Swisher: You said it annoys you?

Schmidt: I was trying to use a non-binding phrase.

8:37 pm: Mossberg: In a few weeks we’ll see something historic. Microsoft will have built its first computer, with Surface. Running a Microsoft OS. That’s a huge change for them, because they were always licensing operating systems to other people. What does this mean?

Schmidt: “It means a lot if the product works.”

Mossberg: Let’s say it does.

Schmidt: “My answer stands.” Microsoft built a structural monopoly around Windows. “Produced enormous value, and a series of antitrust cases, which they lost.” So is that the right model to solve problems? I would argue that we’ve evolved to a new model, like with Android. “We’re going to see an explosion of integrated hardware/software solutions.”

Mossberg: Can some other company make a truly integrated device that’s comparable to what Apple does and Microsoft is trying to do?

Schmidt: Google is doing that with Chromebooks.

Mossberg: Yeah, but they’re made by someone else. Now you own a hardware company, Motorola. So when will we see a “pure” Google phone that they made?

(Schmidt argues that it’s already happening because Motorola is a subsidiary and is working on phones, etc. A non-answer.)

Swisher: We talked to Samsung when you were buying Motorola, and they were not happy.

Schmidt: We’re not going to give Motorola an advantage of over Samsung.

Mossberg: Why would you do that?

Schmidt: Because we want lots of partners.

Mossberg: So are you saying you can’t both license software and make your own products?

Schmidt: No, that’s what we’re doing.

Swisher: You guys have vast ambitions. I think about you like the Borg. What is the end game? In the beginning you wanted to collect all the world’s information.

Schmidt: We want to be in the center of the information revolution. “The world doesn’t need more copycat products; it needs innovative products.”

Apple has the cash, people and scale to do what Google is trying to do. Not sure about Facebook and Amazon.

(Some jokes about Google Glass.)

Swisher: What are you doing with self-driving cars?

Schmidt: Why don’t we celebrate innovation? “Don’t you want a car that drives you?”

Swisher: I’m not sure I want a Google car. … Still, what’s the goal here?

Schmidt: Let’s talk about cars. “It’s really an error that we’re allowed to drive the car.” A computer can obviously do this better “once we get a few bugs ironed out.” There are 30,000 people killed on American highways. It’s a terrible tragedy. If there’s some way we can help, that’s a good thing. Most likely scenario is that the car manufacturers end up using some of the technology, and we’re in talks with them.

Same thing with Google Glass — we don’t know what it will be like for other people to be able to use this technology, but we’ll find out.

8:48 pm: Mossberg: One day Sergey Brin dragged me into the “holodeck” at Google. It was pretty cool.

Swisher: What’s your life like right now?

Schmidt: I spend a lot of time on airplanes. Very interested in the effect of all this technology on society. Publishing a book on this next year. It’s overwhelmingly positive, but we have to look out for stuff, like when autocrats misuse this stuff.

Morale in the U.S. is the lowest it has been in decades. That’s a demographic problem, a global problem, and an automation problem. That’s the underpinning of all of these debates. The only solution I can come up with is innovation.

8:51 pm: Schmidt: Like everyone else, I’ve come to the conclusion that the only way to fix this is by education. The gap between the elite and everyone else when it comes to technology is getting greater and greater. We need to make that gap shorter.

Mossberg: Are you a proponent of using technology for online education “even at an elite institution like Columbia”?

8:53 pm: Schmidt: I describe all of the online education efforts today as version one. Think about the early iPhone. So much has changed. These are all glimmers of what will be possible.

Q&A from the audience:

Q: Please comment on HP’s struggles and prospects.

Schmidt: Meg Whitman is very capable, and she’s identified that this is a multiyear turnaround. Hard for me to opine on it. “It’s very easy to criticize a company that you’re not in.” When I used to be at Sun, “we had lots of time.” The industry is so competitive now, there’s no time. If you’re off by a week, you miss millions of dollars. It’s very hard to stay on that curve.

Q: If you had to be a CEO again, would you choose Apple, Amazon or Facebook?

Schmidt: I was on Apple’s board, and I’ll always have a soft spot for them. I was very good friends and very close to Steve Jobs, and we miss him dearly. Jeff Bezos has made remarkable moves. And again, Facebook has a billion users.

Mossberg: So which one?

Schmidt: Which one has the most cash? That would be Apple.

Q: When will we have mainstream self-driven cars?

Schmidt: “I’ve been driven in one, and it’s a life-changing experience.” We call it driverless, but it’s better to think of it as car autopilot. There’s a big red disconnect button, and I think that will always be the case. You’re always going to be sitting behind the wheel.

Q: Apple gets huge margins selling phones. What will reduce that?

Schmidt: Competition.

Q: How will you compete in Asia and China specifically?

Schmidt: We want to continue to serve customers everywhere. Building out in Korea. We’re not No. 1 in four or five countries and we’re working on that.

Swisher: What about China?

Schmidt: China has this “hellacious law … true, hardcore censorship.” When we entered China, we agreed to do this, but we’d publish the fact that this information was omitted. But we would cache the content, and China would get mad and just cut off our access. Untenable.

I think that’s roughly where we are. We have a pretty good export ad business in China, but that’s about it. I can’t imagine their new leaders calling me up and saying, “Oh Eric, we apologize.”

Q: Future products and services?

Schmidt: We don’t talk about those.

Mossberg: Okay, what about this. Let’s talk about technology in general. There’s the smartphone, and now there’s the tablet. So what’s the next big thing?

Schmidt: More mobility. Mobile first. Now companies build mobile applications first, Web apps second.

There are “acres and acres” of start-ups building powerful stuff for mobile. The underlying structure here is big data, and when you have all of this stuff connected, you can do interesting stuff. Amazon is starting to do it. We’re getting closer to “true AI.” Imagine your house and driverless car, and all of these basic tasks are taken care of for you by AI. You can see that now by looking at young people today who live on the Web, and get all this information from Twitter, and we’ll be able to get everyone to get all sorts of information that way.

Mossberg: How long will that take?

Schmidt: Don’t know. There’s an 80/20 problem where the 20 percent we haven’t figured out is the most crucial part.

This will apply to biomedicine. Pills that will Wi-Fi out your basic medical condition, could alert your doctor “that you’re about to die, come to the hospital.”

Swisher: Would you buy Twitter?

Schmidt: Can’t talk about M&A. We had Twitter in search results and that fell apart but I’d love to get that to work again. We now have a competitor of sorts in Google+.

Q: How do you deal with environmental costs of the server farms that power the cloud?

Schmidt: We have the world’s most powerful data centers. “When you’re in them, it feels like you’re in a submarine.” We’ve done many many things to make the impact less, and we think ours have half the impact of other data centers. If we get better at this stuff, people will be more efficient, and the servers will be more efficient, and “hopefully this will be a net positive.”

Mossberg: Let’s talk about journalism. Are you worried about the future of journalism?

Schmidt: I have been for a long time. There are a couple of success models, and they all use new models: Politico and Huffington Post. Incumbents will move to subscription models, because they understand that. So what does this mean for journalism?

1) Extra money that used to be generated by the “unholy alliance” of print, classifieds, etc. That’s at risk, has been for a while. “That’s a real loss” at a city level, and an investigative level, etc.

2) And what happens to the brands? The top brands remain quite strong. The mid-tier regional brands have become not as relevant. So one idea is “the new brands will be much more celebrity driven.” So the ultimate structure may be traditional brands, and celebrity driven brands, and I have no idea what they will look like, but people will follow them.

Swisher: Like the Ashton Kutcher Daily?

Schmidt: Or the Jay-Z Post.

Swisher: What about Google buying some of these companies, like the Times?

Schmidt: We decided not to cross those lines. One day I was talking to Larry and Sergey for quite some time about getting into the refrigerator business. And it took me a while to realize they were joking.

9:15 pm: And we’re done. Thanks for following along.

That Steve Jobs was a genius, a giant influence on multiple industries and billions of lives, has been written many times since he retired as Apple’s CEO in August. He was a historical figure on the scale of a Thomas Edison or a Henry Ford, and set the mold for many other corporate leaders in many other industries.

He did what a CEO should: Hired and inspired great people; managed for the long term, not the quarter or the short-term stock price; made big bets and took big risks. He insisted on the highest product quality and on building things to delight and empower actual users, not intermediaries like corporate IT directors or wireless carriers. And he could sell. Man, he could sell.

As he liked to say, he lived at the intersection of technology and liberal arts.

But there was a more personal side of Steve Jobs, of course, and I was fortunate enough to see a bit of it, because I spent hours in conversation with him, over the 14 years he ran Apple. Since I am a product reviewer, and not a news reporter charged with covering the company’s business, he felt a bit more comfortable talking to me about things he might not have said to most other journalists.

Even in his death, I won’t violate the privacy of those conversations. But here are a few stories that illustrate the man as I knew him.

The Phone Calls

I never knew Steve when he was first at Apple. I wasn’t covering technology then. And I only met him once, briefly, between his stints at the company. But, within days of his return, in 1997, he began calling my house, on Sunday nights, for four or five straight weekends. As a veteran reporter, I understood that part of this was an attempt to flatter me, to get me on the side of a teetering company whose products I had once recommended, but had, more recently, advised readers to avoid.

Yet there was more to the calls than that. They turned into marathon, 90-minute, wide-ranging, off-the-record discussions that revealed to me the stunning breadth of the man. One minute he’d be talking about sweeping ideas for the digital revolution. The next about why Apple’s current products were awful, and how a color, or angle, or curve, or icon was embarrassing.

After the second such call, my wife became annoyed at the intrusion he was making in our weekend. I didn’t.

Later, he’d sometimes call to complain about some reviews, or parts of reviews — though, in truth, I felt very comfortable recommending most of his products for the average, non-techie consumers at whom I aim my columns. (That may have been because they were his target, too.) I knew he would be complaining because he’d start every call by saying “Hi, Walt. I’m not calling to complain about today’s column, but I have some comments, if that’s okay.” I usually disagreed with his comments, but that was okay, too.

The Product Unveilings

Sometimes, not always, he’d invite me in to see certain big products before he unveiled them to the world. He may have done the same with other journalists. We’d meet in a giant boardroom, with just a few of his aides present, and he’d insist — even in private — on covering the new gadgets with cloths and then uncovering them like the showman he was, a gleam in his eye and passion in his voice. We’d then often sit down for a long, long discussion of the present, the future, and general industry gossip.

I still remember the day he showed me the first iPod. I was amazed that a computer company would branch off into music players, but he explained, without giving any specifics away, that he saw Apple as a digital products company, not a computer company. It was the same with the iPhone, the iTunes music store, and later the iPad, which he asked me to his home to see, because he was too ill at the time to go to the office.

The Slides

To my knowledge, the only tech conference Steve Jobs regularly appeared at, the only event he didn’t somehow control, was our D: All Things Digital conference, where he appeared repeatedly for unrehearsed, onstage interviews. We had one rule that really bothered him: We never allowed slides, which were his main presentation tool.

One year, about an hour before his appearance, I was informed that he was backstage preparing dozens of slides, even though I had reminded him a week earlier of the no-slides policy. I asked two of his top aides to tell him he couldn’t use the slides, but they each said they couldn’t do it, that I had to. So, I went backstage and told him the slides were out. Famously prickly, he could have stormed out, refused to go on. And he did try to argue with me. But, when I insisted, he just said “Okay.” And he went on stage without them, and was, as usual, the audience’s favorite speaker.

Ice Water in Hell

For our fifth D conference, both Steve and his longtime rival, the brilliant Bill Gates, surprisingly agreed to a joint appearance, their first extended onstage joint interview ever. But it almost got derailed.

Earlier in the day, before Gates arrived, I did a solo onstage interview with Jobs, and asked him what it was like to be a major Windows developer, since Apple’s iTunes program was by then installed on hundreds of millions of Windows PCs.

He quipped: “It’s like giving a glass of ice water to someone in Hell.” When Gates later arrived and heard about the comment, he was, naturally, enraged, because my partner Kara Swisher and I had assured both men that we hoped to keep the joint session on a high plane.

In a pre-interview meeting, Gates said to Jobs: “So I guess I’m the representative from Hell.” Jobs merely handed Gates a cold bottle of water he was carrying. The tension was broken, and the interview was a triumph, with both men acting like statesmen. When it was over, the audience rose in a standing ovation, some of them in tears.

The Optimist

I have no way of knowing how Steve talked to his team during Apple’s darkest days in 1997 and 1998, when the company was on the brink and he was forced to turn to archrival Microsoft for a rescue. He certainly had a nasty, mercurial side to him, and I expect that, then and later, it emerged inside the company and in dealings with partners and vendors, who tell believable stories about how hard he was to deal with.

But I can honestly say that, in my many conversations with him, the dominant tone he struck was optimism and certainty, both for Apple and for the digital revolution as a whole. Even when he was telling me about his struggles to get the music industry to let him sell digital songs, or griping about competitors, at least in my presence, his tone was always marked by patience and a long-term view. This may have been for my benefit, knowing that I was a journalist, but it was striking nonetheless.

At times in our conversations, when I would criticize the decisions of record labels or phone carriers, he’d surprise me by forcefully disagreeing, explaining how the world looked from their point of view, how hard their jobs were in a time of digital disruption, and how they would come around.

This quality was on display when Apple opened its first retail store. It happened to be in the Washington, D.C., suburbs, near my home. He conducted a press tour for journalists, as proud of the store as a father is of his first child. I commented that, surely, there’d only be a few stores, and asked what Apple knew about retailing.

He looked at me like I was crazy, said there’d be many, many stores, and that the company had spent a year tweaking the layout of the stores, using a mockup at a secret location. I teased him by asking if he, personally, despite his hard duties as CEO, had approved tiny details like the translucency of the glass and the color of the wood.

He said he had, of course.

The Walk

After his liver transplant, while he was recuperating at home in Palo Alto, California, Steve invited me over to catch up on industry events that had transpired during his illness. It turned into a three-hour visit, punctuated by a walk to a nearby park that he insisted we take, despite my nervousness about his frail condition.

He explained that he walked each day, and that each day he set a farther goal for himself, and that, today, the neighborhood park was his goal. As we were walking and talking, he suddenly stopped, not looking well. I begged him to return to the house, noting that I didn’t know CPR and could visualize the headline: “Helpless Reporter Lets Steve Jobs Die on the Sidewalk.”

But he laughed, and refused, and, after a pause, kept heading for the park. We sat on a bench there, talking about life, our families, and our respective illnesses (I had had a heart attack some years earlier). He lectured me about staying healthy. And then we walked back.

Steve Jobs didn’t die that day, to my everlasting relief. But now he really is gone, much too young, and it is the world’s loss.

Editors Note: Here is a video of Walt talking about that walk with Jobs:

RELATED POSTS:

• Samsung, Google Cancel Launch Event Out of Respect for Steve Jobs
• Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert Say Goodbye to Steve Jobs
• An Accountant’s Soul Presides Over the P&L at Apple
• New York Times Crossword Honors Steve Jobs With Puzzle Written by Quora Engineer
• For Steve (Comic)
• Walt Mossberg Reflects on Life and Career of Steve Jobs for Fox Business (Video)
• Apple Shares Rise
• Steve Jobs Biography Arrives in October, a Month Early
• Now What? The Post-Jobs Era in Tech.
• Thoughts on the First Day of Apple’s Post-Jobs Era
• How Will Apple Shares Fare Today?
• Tributes to Steve Jobs, in Pictures
• The Three Irreplaceable Qualities of Steve Jobs
• Walt Mossberg: The Steve Jobs I Knew
• Remembering the Life of Steve Jobs
• Steve Jobs in His Own Words
• Barack Obama On Steve Jobs
• Tech and Media Titans Pay Tribute to Steve Jobs
• Steve Jobs’s Appearances at D, the Full Video Sessions
• Bill Gates: “I Will Miss Steve Immensely”
• Steve Jobs Through the Years: Highlights and Clips From the D Conference
• Steve Jobs Has Died

Steve Jobs Full Coverage »

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20121005/the-steve-jobs-i-knew/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120919/iwitness-reports-walt-on-the-iphone-5-katie-on-ios-6-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20120919/iwitness-reports-walt-on-the-iphone-5-katie-on-ios-6-video/#comments Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:39:16 +0000 John Murrell http://allthingsd.com/?p=252162 The news this morning on both the hardware and software fronts was distinctly Apple-flavored, and AllThingsD’s Walt Mossberg and Katie Boehret did their part, with reviews of the iPhone 5 and iOS 6, respectively.

Being multimedia kind of people, the two also got a chance to describe their impressions in video as guests on The Wall Street Journal’s “Digits” show. Here are the clips:

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120919/iwitness-reports-walt-on-the-iphone-5-katie-on-ios-6-video/feed/ 1 http://allthingsd.com/20120816/apples-new-tv-plan-same-tv-different-box/ http://allthingsd.com/20120816/apples-new-tv-plan-same-tv-different-box/#comments Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:00:26 +0000 Peter Kafka http://allthingsd.com/?p=242030 The latest from my corporate cousins at The Wall Street Journal: Tim Cook is now more interested in a TV box than a TV set. Certainly plausible — just ask Time Warner’s Jeff Bewkes, who was predicting this a month ago.

But the bottom line hasn’t changed. Apple keeps poking at the TV industrial complex, and keeps concluding that it’s better off playing along than playing a new game.

To spell that out: If Apple really wanted to change the way people watched TV, it would change the way people paid for TV. And that would involve setting up new arrangements with the people who make TV content.

But Apple can’t do that — either because the content guys don’t want to change the way their business works, or Apple isn’t willing to pay enough to make them change. Or both.

The result is the same: If you want to use a theoretical Apple TV of the future, you’re still going to end up paying someone a monthly fee for a bundle of channels, the majority of which you don’t watch.

Depending on how the deal works out, you may end up paying a pay-TV provider, or paying a broadband provider plus a programming provider. But the results will effectively be the same — and your checks will probably end up getting cashed by the same people, regardless, since there’s little to no competition for the pipe that goes into your living room.

You can argue that this is terrible for consumers (because they subsidize waste), or that it’s great for consumers (because all the other consumers subsidize their favorite programs). But it’s a model that has proven very hard to dislodge.

If Apple — or anyone else — wants to blow it up, they’re going to have to find a way to get people the stuff they want without paying for everything else.

There are a couple ways of going about that:

• You could drive very big trucks full of cash up to the existing content guys, and pay them a ginormous amount of money to sell their stuff — say, pro football — directly to your new TV business, with the understanding that they might lose their existing deals with everyone else. Apple, Google and a handful of other big tech companies could afford to do this, but they have yet to do so.
• Or you could build up a whole lot of stuff that people end up valuing as much or more than the stuff they’re already paying for, and deliver that to your customers directly. Google and YouTube are playing with this, but the $200-million-plus they’re betting on “channels” isn’t an all-in bet. It’s just a test.

Meanwhile, if you want to play by the TV industrial complex’s rules, those guys are happy to play along. See: Google, which is in the process of competing directly with the established cable providers, but is still able to get cable TV programming — even from from Viacom, which is still suing Google — because it is acting just like any other pay-TV provider.

It’s fun to imagine a world where Apple helps get you your TV, and it’s very likely that an Apple TV experience would be much better than the cable TV experience you have now. Imagine ditching that craptastic TV guide for a sleek one designed by Jony Ive!

But unless Apple TV is going to offer something fundamentally different than the choice consumers have today, it’s hard to get riled up about this stuff.

——

For the record: So what does Tim Cook have to say about all this? Here’s the most specific answer he gave about Apple TV’s answer at the D10 conference in May – which is to say, a very oblique answer:

Walt Mossberg: As you think about improving the television experience, because you just said you’re thinking about that, can it be done with a box and leave the kind of big panel and everything to other people, and just really build a lot of smarts and software and other things into a box and not build the whole thing?
Tim Cook: Here’s the way, Walt, we would look at that is –
Mossberg: Whether it’s you or anybody.
Cook: We would look not just at this area but other areas and ask: can we control the key technology? Can we make a significant contribution, far beyond what others have done in this area? Can we make a product that we all want, because we think we’re reasonably good proxies for others? And so, those are all the things that we would ask about any new product category. It’s the ones we ask about products within families that we’re already announced. And so this is sort of how we think about it and how we look at it.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120816/apples-new-tv-plan-same-tv-different-box/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120704/hey-internet-girl-aaron-sorkins-tv-news-2-0-show-gets-a-second-season-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20120704/hey-internet-girl-aaron-sorkins-tv-news-2-0-show-gets-a-second-season-video/#comments Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:05:10 +0000 Kara Swisher http://allthingsd.com/?p=227426

Hollywood super-writer Aaron Sorkin has already gotten his new show on the struggles of creating a new television news show in the Internet age renewed for another season.

The successful Sorkin made light of the struggles to attract a big audience for the HBO program in a recent onstage interview at the 10th D: All Things Digital conference.

Not so hard, as it turns out for the voluble scribe, whose “The Newsroom” got 2.1 million viewers in its opening two weeks ago, which is just behind HBO’s “Boardwalk Empire” and “Game of Thrones.”

Sorkin did manage to attract some controversy recently when he said in a tense interview with Sarah Nicole Pickett of Canada’s Globe and Mail:

“Listen here, Internet girl. It wouldn’t kill you to watch a film or pick up a newspaper once in a while.”

The fab line did result in an even funnier Tumblr on the kerfuffle.

Here’s the full video of Sorkin’s interview with Walt Mossberg at D10, as well as another very funny recent viral video, titled “Sorkinisms,” in which the writer uses his best lines over and over, compiled from a variety of his shows.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120704/hey-internet-girl-aaron-sorkins-tv-news-2-0-show-gets-a-second-season-video/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120630/five-years-of-walt-mossbergs-iphone-reviews/ http://allthingsd.com/20120630/five-years-of-walt-mossbergs-iphone-reviews/#comments Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:12:18 +0000 Digits Blog http://allthingsd.com/?p=226439

As the iPhone turns five years old today, here’s a look back at WSJ columnist Walt Mossberg’s reviews of each iPhone over the years.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120630/five-years-of-walt-mossbergs-iphone-reviews/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120531/day-two-at-d10-in-tweets-and-pictures/ http://allthingsd.com/20120531/day-two-at-d10-in-tweets-and-pictures/#comments Thu, 31 May 2012 10:00:14 +0000 Eric Johnson http://allthingsd.com/?p=215153
]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120531/day-two-at-d10-in-tweets-and-pictures/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120530/remembering-the-legacy-of-apple-ceo-steve-jobs-at-d10/ http://allthingsd.com/20120530/remembering-the-legacy-of-apple-ceo-steve-jobs-at-d10/#comments Thu, 31 May 2012 00:53:32 +0000 Ina Fried http://allthingsd.com/?p=213662 Inevitably, much of D10 has been a reflection on the legacy of Steve Jobs, the iconic Apple founder who died last year.

However, the conversation moved from the background to the foreground on Wednesday afternoon as two of Jobs’s longtime friends — Ed Catmull and Larry Ellison — shared their reflections with Walt Mossberg.

Naturally, there was lots of talk about Jobs’s charisma, legendary negotiating skills and vision.

But Catmull noted that not all of these qualities were there in Jobs’s early days, something that Ellison agreed cost him his job at the helm of Apple.

“The way he negotiated, the way he interacted with people, didn’t initially work well,” Catmull said. However, Catmull said that Jobs was smart enough to see this and learn from it.

Among the fascinating stories was the tale of how Jobs and Ellison got to know one another as neighbors more than 20 years ago.

Jobs’s girlfriend had given him a live peacock as a birthday present and Ellison went over to Jobs’s house to complain about the noisy bird, noting he was a programmer and didn’t like to be awakened early.

“You don’t like that bird either?” Jobs asked Ellison.

Jobs said he would tell the girlfriend that he had to get rid of the bird, but only if Ellison backed him up.

As for Pixar, Catmull noted that Jobs had a different presence.

“Steve never came to a story meeting,” Catmull said, noting that he deferred to the creative team. “It was actually pretty amazing.”

Jobs’s key characteristic, Ellison said, was struggling through every detail, obsessing about it until it was fixed to his satisfaction. Apple came to be the most valuable company in the world, but that wasn’t even one of Jobs’s goals, Ellison said.

“He wasn’t trying to be rich,” Ellison said. “He wasn’t trying to be famous. He wasn’t trying to be powerful. He was obsessed with the creative process and building something that was beautiful.”

But, Ellison said, Jobs did call his friend when Apple passed Oracle in market capitalization, noting that a lot of folks in Silicon Valley measure themselves by their company’s value. And, Ellison said, the crazy thing was Apple kept going up and up. So much so that Ellison called Jobs to tell him to knock it off and that he was making everyone else look bad.

As for Jobs’s signature outfit of a black mock turtleneck and jeans, Ellison said it wasn’t a fashion statement as much as it was Jobs not wanting to have to invest time and energy thinking about what to wear.

It wasn’t all sunshine, though, as Ellison reflected on how exasperating his best friend could be.

“He was a bit of a control freak,” Ellison said.

“He was?” Walt quipped.

“A little bit,” Ellison said. “He wanted to engineer every bit of the user experience.”

Ellison noted that he grew so tired of seeing Jobs show him a slightly updated version of “Toy Story” ahead of the film’s release that he would only visit if Jobs promised not to show the movie again.

The Oracle chief said that he also grew tired of spending Sundays walking through a mock-up of the Apple Store talking about the checkout process and bemoaning the flaws in the Oracle software.

“Steve did want to debate things,” Ellison said. “You had to be able to persuade him, but he would listen. He wanted to build the best possible products.”

But Jobs could be brutal to his workers as well. “He learned to temper that,” Ellison said.

There was also consensus from the panelists that there really is no way to imitate Jobs just by looking at his management style. As Ellison put it, it’s like trying to paint like Picasso by wondering if you need more red.

The talk began with a video highlighting some of Jobs’s many appearances at the D conference over the years.

Jobs appeared on the D stage six times before he passed away last October, including a memorable joint panel in 2007 with Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates.

Full D10 Conference Coverage

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120530/remembering-the-legacy-of-apple-ceo-steve-jobs-at-d10/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120530/steve-jobs-at-d-podcasts/ http://allthingsd.com/20120530/steve-jobs-at-d-podcasts/#comments Thu, 31 May 2012 00:23:06 +0000 Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher http://allthingsd.com/?p=213490 There’s lots of video of the late Steve Jobs, primarily from his famous introductions of Apple products over the years and from his oft-quoted Stanford commencement address.

But by far the largest trove of video of the legendary innovator candidly answering unrehearsed questions and explaining his views on technology and business comes from his six lengthy appearances at our D: All Things Digital conference, from 2003 to 2010.

In these onstage conversations, Jobs explained his — and Apple’s — evolving philosophy of where the digital world was heading, and of business itself. He discussed competitors, controversies and his own sense of what matters most. He stressed the importance of building products for their actual users, not “orifices” like corporate IT departments or cellphone carriers. He explained why it was often more important to decide what products and features not to build than to pick the ones that were built. He even appeared jointly in a historic conversation with his lifelong rival, Bill Gates.

So, as a memorial to a great man and in the spirit of sharing a priceless piece of history, we are making all six of these appearances available on iTunes for free, in high-quality video. We thank Apple for its cooperation in making these videos available for all.

– Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher

VIDEO PODCASTS    AUDIO PODCASTS

Full D10 Conference Coverage

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120530/steve-jobs-at-d-podcasts/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120530/day-one-at-d10-in-tweets-and-pictures/ http://allthingsd.com/20120530/day-one-at-d10-in-tweets-and-pictures/#comments Wed, 30 May 2012 10:00:29 +0000 Eric Johnson http://allthingsd.com/?p=213986
]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120530/day-one-at-d10-in-tweets-and-pictures/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120529/tim-cook-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20120529/tim-cook-video/#comments Wed, 30 May 2012 05:50:37 +0000 Peter Kafka http://allthingsd.com/?p=213545

Tim Cook learned a lot from Steve Jobs, and one of the big takeaways seems to be: Don’t tip your hand.

The Apple CEO was unwilling to tackle questions about any future product plans during his first appearance on the D10 stage Tuesday night.

But Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher were still able to extract all sorts of insight from Cook, on topics ranging from his old relationship with Jobs to his current relationship with Facebook. And yes, he talked about Apple TV — but only the one he’s selling right now.

Full D10 Conference Coverage

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120529/tim-cook-video/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20120402/hp-envy-spectre-14-a-premium-ultrabook-at-a-premium-price/ http://allthingsd.com/20120402/hp-envy-spectre-14-a-premium-ultrabook-at-a-premium-price/#comments Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:00:04 +0000 Lauren Goode http://allthingsd.com/?p=191712 Over the past six months in the personal computing world, there has been much ado about Ultrabooks — thin, lightweight laptops with Intel-determined technical specifications that compete with Apple’s MacBook Air. Windows PC makers like Dell, Lenovo, Asus and Acer have all introduced Ultrabooks, and Hewlett-Packard, the world’s largest computer maker, has gotten into the game as well.

This week, I’ve been testing the HP Envy Spectre 14, a glass-covered laptop that falls into the Ultrabook category. The Envy Spectre hit the market in February, and the base model currently retails for $1,400.

I liked the Envy Spectre. It’s eye-catching, lighter than the laptop I usually carry, and zippy in terms of its processing power. But compared to other Ultrabooks, it’s heavier and more expensive. It’s really more of a premium product, rather than an ultra-light laptop. Also, there were a couple elements of its design, such as the fact that it wasn’t tapered and the lid was hard to open, that might prevent it from being my main laptop squeeze.

The Envy Spectre 14 is 20 millimeters thick — just over 0.79 inches — and has a 13.3-inch-wide body with a 14-inch-diagonal LED-backlit display. It weighs just shy of four pounds. In comparison, the Dell XPS 13, which AllThingsD’s Walt Mossberg recently reviewed, is, at its largest point, 0.71 inches thick and just under three pounds. The 13-inch MacBook Air, which at its largest point is 0.68 inches thick, also weighs in at 2.96 pounds.

Despite its thickness, the HP Envy Spectre 14 is an attractive laptop. Its aluminum body is covered with Gorilla Glass, the thin, chemically-strengthened glass that makes up the displays of many smartphones and tablets. The glass is layered over three areas of the laptop: The lid, the 1600 by 900 pixel display screen and the palm rest. The trackpad is coated with chemically etched glass, which gives it slightly more traction than the cool-to-the-touch, super glossy Gorilla Glass.

The glass is scratch-resistant — I threw my keys into my laptop bag a few times, and the laptop wasn’t scratched — but it’s definitely not smudge-resistant. As with my smartphone and iPad, it was only a matter of time before the Spectre was covered with cloudy fingerprints. Fortunately, HP has included a protective case with the laptop.

The Spectre comes with a 128 gigabyte solid-state drive, 4GB of memory, runs Windows 7 and is powered by an Intel Core i5 processor, with the option to upgrade to a faster i7 processor for an extra $200. For an additional $300, you can also get a 256GB solid-state drive.

When I fired up the Envy Spectre for the first time, I noticed how quickly it booted up and how fast it was compared to my regular laptop, a fully loaded MacBook Pro. I downloaded iTunes, purchased a new album, installed a new Web browser and ran multiple Web pages at once, including a video-streaming site; even with all that going on, the Envy Spectre didn’t seem to slow down at all.

HP claims 9.5 hours of battery life with the Envy Spectre, provided that the user has the laptop set to HP’s recommended power-saving settings. In my test of the Spectre, which involved turning off power savers and setting the display to full brightness, connecting to Wi-Fi, playing an iTunes playlist nonstop and running an email application, the battery lasted just over five hours. With more normal usage, I estimate you’ll get about an hour more.

After a week with the Envy Spectre, there were a couple of elements of its design that bugged me. The first is that it’s actually difficult to open. There’s a barely-there lip on the lid of the laptop, and every time the device was shut, I had to dig my nails around the edges to pry it open.

I also noticed that the Envy Spectre’s screen doesn’t recline as far back as some other laptop screens do. This laptop has a dropped hinge so the bottom of its display butts up against the keyboard, physically preventing it from going back further. I compared the Spectre to an Asus Ultrabook and even a MacBook Pro, and both laptops opened up wider than the Spectre does. For users who prefer a wide range of motion with their laptop screens, this could be a drawback.

But there were aspects of the hardware that I liked. The LED-backlit keyboard is a nice touch, and the keys had a velvety feel to them. The keys also have proximity sensors that sense when the user has stepped away from the laptop for an extended period, dimming the backlighting and acting as a minor battery-saving mechanism. While some people are used to function keys performing common shortcuts — such as F5 for refreshing a Web page — I liked that the Spectre’s function keys adjusted display brightness and controlled music playing.

There’s an easy-to-access volume-control wheel on the right-hand side of the keyboard. This is part of HP’s Beats product, offered in select computers, which is supposed to produce better-sounding audio. While Beats audio isn’t going to replace the sound system in your home or apartment anytime soon, the music tracks I listened to through the laptop sounded fuller with Beats, especially when heard through headphones.

Unlike the MacBook Air, the Envy Spectre comes with an expandable built-in Ethernet port, along with two USB ports, an HDMI port and a Mini Display port.

There are also some other sweeteners that HP threw in with the Envy Spectre 14, including Adobe Photoshop Elements and Premiere Elements (which photo and video hounds will appreciate), a two-year warranty for the price of one year and a two-year Norton AntiVirus software package.

I would recommend the HP Envy Spectre 14 — but as a premium laptop, not as an Ultrabook. For consumers who want a super slim, lightweight laptop, there are options with similar technical specifications that weigh in at under three pounds and cost less.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120402/hp-envy-spectre-14-a-premium-ultrabook-at-a-premium-price/feed/ 7 http://allthingsd.com/20120207/neil-young-the-donkey-and-digital-music-the-full-dive-into-media-interview-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20120207/neil-young-the-donkey-and-digital-music-the-full-dive-into-media-interview-video/#comments Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:00:07 +0000 Peter Kafka http://allthingsd.com/?p=171907 Neil Young has a long and storied career, but he didn’t want to talk about it when he came onstage at D: Dive Into Media last week. Instead, the musician was pushing his vision of the future: One where lots of people listen to really good-sounding music.

To be clear: Young isn’t complaining about today’s songs. He’s complaining about the way those songs are recorded and distributed.

There’s a colorful donkey input-output metaphor here, which Young uses to make his point. And he also has a plan to fix the problem.

But first he has to convince people there is a problem. And, as Walt Mossberg and I point out, lots of people have been buying (and stealing) music in the MP3 format that Young hates, and they don’t seem to be complaining about it.

Young says former Apple CEO Steve Jobs agreed with him, though. And now he’s looking for new allies. You can see the entire pitch here:

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20120207/neil-young-the-donkey-and-digital-music-the-full-dive-into-media-interview-video/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20111023/at-long-last-hands-on-with-lytros-living-camera/ http://allthingsd.com/20111023/at-long-last-hands-on-with-lytros-living-camera/#comments Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:00:59 +0000 Ina Fried http://allthingsd.com/?p=135789 After spending the past several months writing about Lytro, its launch and road to market, it was fun to finally get a chance to give it a try at this past week’s AsiaD conference in Hong Kong.

Photo credit: Eric Cheng / Lytro

The technology hasn’t changed since its June debut. Under the hood, Lytro’s camera uses a new technology called light field photography, which allows for so-called “living pictures” that can be refocused after they are taken, in addition to performing a few other tricks.

What is new is the design of the camera, which until last week had been carefully hidden from public view. It’s only about an inch high and wide, and several inches long — mostly to accommodate the eight-inch zoom. It’s got just two buttons — one for turning on the camera, the other for pressing the shutter. Other moves, such as zooming and viewing pictures, are accomplished by manipulating the multitouch display on the rear of the camera, or a touch-sensitive zone along the top of the camera.

In addition to getting to take my first picture with the camera, I got to watch Lytro demonstrate it on stage.

While Lytro’s images have become well-known for their ability to be refocused, one of the harder-to-explain features is the 3-D-like feature, achievable through something called parallax. Luckily, this can be illustrated with an animated image, like the one below, from Lytro’s onstage demo with Walt Mossberg.

The picture I took of the AsiaD stage is a more typical light field composition, with various spots that can be brought into focus. Try clicking on the iPhone screen, the camera viewfinder and the stage to see the different focal points.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20111023/at-long-last-hands-on-with-lytros-living-camera/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20111020/al-gore-video-highlights-from-asiad-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20111020/al-gore-video-highlights-from-asiad-video/#comments Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:20:31 +0000 Beth Callaghan http://allthingsd.com/?p=135353 Former Vice President Al Gore arrived at AsiaD almost directly from Steve Jobs’s memorial at Apple — where he is a board member — and the first thing he talked about in his interview with Walt Mossberg was the event itself: “Beautiful and moving … it’s a terrible loss, of course, for the entire world. We’ll all miss Steve.”

Gore also expressed his deep confidence in the Apple executive team and the prospects of the company moving forward. Among other topics, he and Walt talked about the environmental effects of the tech industry, the power of television and, of course, climate change. Video highlights from the conversation follow.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20111020/al-gore-video-highlights-from-asiad-video/feed/ 1 http://allthingsd.com/20111020/won-pyo-hong-video-highlights-from-asiad-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20111020/won-pyo-hong-video-highlights-from-asiad-video/#comments Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:29:53 +0000 Beth Callaghan http://allthingsd.com/?p=134845 In his interview today with Walt Mossberg at AsiaD, Samsung’s Won-Pyo Hong — who heads global product strategy for the Korean company’s mobile business — talked a little bit about the “multidimensional relationships” his company enjoys, including its relationship with Apple, which features mutual lawsuits as well as large volumes of trade. That and more in the following highlight reel:

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20111020/won-pyo-hong-video-highlights-from-asiad-video/feed/ 3 http://allthingsd.com/20111020/kibot-demo-at-asiad-video/ http://allthingsd.com/20111020/kibot-demo-at-asiad-video/#comments Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:03:59 +0000 Beth Callaghan http://allthingsd.com/?p=134813 Korea Telecom demoed Kibot, its kids’ robot, at AsiaD today. The plastic monkey combines games and education, which is nothing too unique, but as shown in the video below, it also allows parents to call, videochat with their child, and even control the robot remotely.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20111020/kibot-demo-at-asiad-video/feed/ 0 http://allthingsd.com/20111020/jack-dorsey-video-highlights-from-asiad/ http://allthingsd.com/20111020/jack-dorsey-video-highlights-from-asiad/#comments Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:20:10 +0000 Beth Callaghan http://allthingsd.com/?p=134709 Twitter is a big deal in Asia, according to Jack Dorsey, its very busy co-founder and executive chairman. By 2008, the company was translating into Japanese due to a massive amount of tamagotchi activity on the service in Japan. In China, though, not so much. Dorsey spoke with Walt Mossberg today at the AsiaD conference in Hong Kong about Asia, Twitter and Square, among other things. A highlight reel from the interview follows.

]]> http://allthingsd.com/20111020/jack-dorsey-video-highlights-from-asiad/feed/ 0