Dialogue: The Future of Online Obscenity and Social Networks

When the Communications Decency Act (CDA) was enshrined into law with the passage of the historic Telecommunications Act of 1996, it contained a number of controversial provisions that covered “obscene or indecent” online content. But at the behest of ISPs and others concerned about the potentially stifling effects of possible obscenity suits on the still-young network, the CDA also included 47 U.S.C. Sec. 230, commonly known as Section 230, which shielded “interactive computer service providers” from liability for information posted or published by users of their systems.

Although the censorial elements of the CDA were later struck down by the courts, Sec. 230 protections were preserved, and even enhanced, during subsequent legal challenges. Other child safety-oriented laws that Congress passed, such as the Child Online Protection Act of 1998 (COPA), were also struck down as unconstitutional. Currently, therefore, “interactive computer service providers”–which has been interpreted broadly to include almost all types of online services, from ISPs to social-networking sites–are largely free from any liability associated with speech or content that some deem objectionable (e.g., indecent, harassing, defamatory, biased, etc.).

Read the rest of this post


comments so far. Add yours.

About Voices

This is a section of the AllThingsD Web site featuring posts that have been curated from around the Web: pieces we’ve read, discussions we’ve followed, stuff we like. Five posts are included here each weekday, but only the headline and the first two sentences. We link to the original site for the rest. The section is explicitly labeled, so it’s clear that content comes “from other Web sites.”

We also solicit original full-length posts and accept some unsolicited submissions. Voices is edited by Beth Callaghan.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »