Whose Principles Are They?

Can Microsoft really put together the concepts “interoperability” and “principles?” That’s the question to ask following Thursday’s announcement about Microsoft’s so-called new “interoperability principles.” For quick clarification: The principles aren’t really new–the European Union’s Competition Commission required the principles’ framework, in response to Microsoft’s March 2004 adverse antitrust ruling. The timing also is suspicious, given the potential public-relations bang Microsoft could get about a week before a key vote will determine whether or not ISO adopts OOXML (Open Office XML) as a standard.

Read the rest of this post


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://macbeach.blogspot.com Mac Beach

    Another web site used the word “practices” when referring to the MS web page, which didn’t load for me at all.

    Are they having trouble coming up with the right (cooperative sounding but content-free) wording for this “initiative”?

    What the world wants is specifications (software specifications that is) and a promise not to change the code before the public specs are changed and tested.

    I doubt the world will get that though.

About Voices

This is a section of the AllThingsD Web site featuring posts that have been curated from around the Web: pieces we’ve read, discussions we’ve followed, stuff we like. Five posts are included here each weekday, but only the headline and the first two sentences. We link to the original site for the rest. The section is explicitly labeled, so it’s clear that content comes “from other Web sites.”

We also solicit original full-length posts and accept some unsolicited submissions. Voices is edited by Beth Callaghan.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »