Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Exclusive: Want More Followers? Twitter May Help You Buy Some.

Want more people reading your tweets? Twitter may offer you a hand–for a price.

People familiar with the company’s plans say it has been discussing yet another revenue generator: Think of it as a “Promoted Tweeter” product, which highlights specific user accounts, designed to bump up follower counts.

My sources weren’t sure about the business model behind the product, which may be because Twitter itself doesn’t know yet. Some obvious possibilities: Twitter could charge users based on the number of followers they acquired, or simply based on the exposure their Twitter accounts received.

Twitter wouldn’t acknowledge plans for the product at all. Here’s spokesman Sean Garrett, via email: “We will eventually have full suites of both promoted and commercial products. All the components of these two buckets of product have yet to be determined. Some are currently being tested publicly now. Some will be tested soon. Some are just ideas that we are broaching externally for feedback.”

If Twitter does move forward with its plans, it would represent a change in philosophy for the company, which has generally frowned on third-party companies that promise to build up follower counts–even though Twitter itself promotes specific accounts for free, via a modified version of its “suggested user list.” But TweetUp, a prominent and well-funded new start-up, has its own follower-building offering, so perhaps that has caught Twitter’s eye.

My sources say Twitter has discussed using the yet-to-be-named product both on its own Web site as well as third party clients. That would track with other Twitter revenue projects, like “Promoted Tweets,” its play on Google’s (GOOG) AdWords, and “Promoted Trends,” which it just recently launched on its own site but plans on moving to third-party apps as well.

The biggest question: What, exactly, is the value of a Twitter follower?

Twitter’s original “suggested user list” effectively granted a select group of users with follower counts of a million or more. But it’s clear that the majority of those followers, who signed up when they opened accounts, tend not to pay much attention. A smaller, but much more engaged, audience of Twitter readers can be much more valuable. But figuring out how to price that will be a work in progress.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jim-Tobin/689271580 Jim Tobin

    Very interesting. Twittercounter.com has a similar offering where you pay by impressions. Twitter could copy that and make a few bucks without intruding into the stream.

  • http://kentoo.net/ Kentoo

    great!

  • http://twitter.com/seolegende seo legende

    agian: twitter – always at the marketing highway

  • lonnydunn

    Twitter would do well starting rumor and whisper campaigns in advance of any new “products” as they like to call them. Their tract record of launch, irk people, announce, and retract, lose the media war, then retract again seems to imply they need to ditch the marketing staff, and get someone a bit more geek freindly.

    At least in the present and instant case, they appear to be letting the public digest the fact that they are going to sell followers a bit here, a rumor there, and allow it take root and see how it is absorbed in the Blogosphere.

    I don't like the sound of it, as it will only mean the self indulgent and will be more inclined to the shameless art of self promotion, lure the newbies and consolidate egos.

    For the rest of us, like would likely go on as usual…….Oh but for the fact we would never follow a paid account.

    I tweet at ProNetworkBuild.

    Lonny Dunn
    Author/Editor

  • lonnydunn

    Unless handled properly, this roll out needs to take place in bits and pieces, baby steps if you will. In the past Twitter has taken merciless criticism for anything having to do with personal information, as recently FB and Google Mapping have found out. It is not only the Blogosphere but whole nations sued Social Media giants. When the company starts “selling followers” it has to either come up with a new way of expressing this “product” or allow the population as a whole to digest the idea first thru innuendo, rumor and leaks. As they have done here.

    I Tweet at ProNetWorkBuild

    Lonny Dunn
    Author/Editor

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

When I first heard about Facebook, in 2005, I thought it was really stupid. And the same with eBay 20 years earlier.

— Reed Hastings, in a talk with Wired staff at its London offices