Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Inside the Numbers: How Demand Media Will Pitch a Billion-Dollar IPO

Demand Media is a money-losing company. How will it convince Wall Street to value it at a billion dollars or more?

By directing investors’ attention to a set of numbers which say it’s a very profitable company.

The official term for these numbers are “non-GAAP financial measures”. In English, that translates into “accounting you can’t try at home, but which shows off our company in the best possible light.”

And it does! Depending on which set of numbers you want to look at, Demand lost either $4.3 million or $22.3 million on revenues of $114 million in the first half of this year. But Demand’s “Adjusted OIBDA” numbers show a company that made $25.6 million on revenue of $108 million. Much better!

Some investors may balk at these non-GAAP numbers, but Demand, Goldman Sachs (GS) and its other underwriters clearly think there’s a market for them. And there’s certainly a hunger in the tech world for a big, brand name IPO to break the dry spell. You can feel people willing this thing to work.

If Demand did, say, $55 million in OIBDA this year, it would need a multiple of 18 times trailing 12 months earnings to get to a $1 billion valuation. It would need 27x to get the $1.5 billion number that people are whispering to reporters.

Another way to get to $1.5 billion: Project OIBDA of $100 million for 2011, and ask for 15 x on that number. Reminder: $1.5 billion would make Demand worth more than the New York Times (NYT).

Accounting aside, I think the real hurdle for Demand will be making investors comfortable with its reliance on Google to bring in traffic and revenue: Demand relies on Google to bring eyeballs to its content, and Demand relies on Google to turn those eyeballs into money, via AdSense.

If Google (GOOG) changes the way it answers search queries, or overhauls its  contracts with Demand, or even decides to compete with Demand, it could torpedo the company.

The counter to that argument: Every Web publisher is dependent on Google. That’s why all of them spend so much time complaining about the search engine, sucking up to the search engine, and hiring search gurus to help them impress the search engine.

And Google seems to like Demand just fine. All those AdSense clicks are good for Google, and Demand is YouTube’s biggest supplier of content, to boot. So let’s see what investors make of this. We’ll know the answers in a few months.

Meantime, here’s a preview of the Demand roadshow, in the form of an interview Demand CEO Richard Rosenblatt conducted with Kara Swisher a couple of years ago:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Gibbons/746716538 Daniel Gibbons

    The most screwed up thing about Demand is actually not that they are losing money. It’s that the growth of their content and media revenue (which I’m assuming is the line item that investors care about, not the bottom-feeding registrar business) isn’t that impressive. Looks like they grew 25%-ish between ’09 and ’10, and that this rate of growth is quite a bit slower than from ’07 to ’08 and about the same from ’08 to ’09.

    Flat growth AND losing money. Sounds great.

  • http://everything-everywhere.com Gary Arndt

    If Google decides to change their agorithim in the future (something they always do) in a way which is detrimental to Demand Media, they are screwed.

    Media properties might get lots of traffic from Google, but they are not built around Google. They have their own brands and get social media traffic.

    Demand is a 100% Google play. They have no brand. No one goes out seeking Demand Media content because it is from Demand Media.

    Moreover, companies like Demand Media are creating the biggest weakness for Google as a search engine right now. If there is any possibility in the future of a search engine competing with Google, they will do it by removing all the landfill garbage like Demand Media from their search results. If/when that happens, Google will drop Demand Media and every other content farm like a hot rock. http://mediamemo.allthingsd.co.....llar-ipo/#

  • Anonymous

    Oy! OIBDA. Demand’s CFO Charles Hilliard started that spin at his last company – United Online (Nasdaq: UNTD). United had had adjusted OIBDA for the first six months of 2010 of $52,743 more than double Demand Media yet UNTD has a market cap of $477MM. http://investor.untd.com/relea.....eID=496501 UNTD does have $386MM in debt so its enterprise value is probably in the neighborhood of $850MM on double the OIBDA of Demand. What facts don’t support a “Billion Dollar” IPO?

    Another comp which has a more similar operation of generating web content and monetizing it with ads is Internet Brands (Nasdaq:INET). INET had OIBDA (they call it Adjusted EBITDA but it has the same ingredients) of $22,199 with a market cap / enterprise value of $478MM.http://investors.internetbrand.....eID=494137 Where’s the beef?

    Lest not forget the parmount comp of a company that generates internet content and monetizes it with Google’s help, and also has a famous founder, IAC (Nasdaq:IACI). IAC had $70MM in OIBDA for the first six months of 2010 – 2.5X more than Demand. http://iac.mediaroom.com/index.....;item=1821 IAC has $1.6B (yes, Billion) in excess cash and a $2.6B market cap resulting in an enterprise value of $1B. Again, it looks like Demand Needs 2-3X more OIBDA to justify a billion dollar valuation.

    Richard R seems to be a good salesman but its going to be an incredible pitch to convince real money that this is a billion dollar market cap company.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LAKTEFQW5XQ5LX24KIIC6M7I7A Jody

    Demand has to take care of what it already has, which is a mess, before expanding. The pay rate for the work done, actually works against profits. Content is unreliable, incorrect and ill-provided.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

He’s an a–hole. That guy has $2 billion that he made from figuring out ways to steal royalties from artists, and that’s the bottom line. You can’t really trust anybody like that.

— Black Keys drummer Patrick Carney on why he’s not a fan of Sean Parker