Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Condé Nast's iPad Apps Are Too Portly. Blame Adobe.

The Wired iPad app has a weight problem.

The first one came in at about half a gigabyte of memory, and it hasn’t shrunk that much since.

And Condé Nast’s newest iPad app, from the New Yorker, isn’t much better: It takes up 173 megabytes–but that’s for a weekly issue. If Condé can’t slim the app down, a month’s worth of New Yorkers will be much heavier than the first monthly Wired app.

And at that rate, a year’s worth of issues would consume more than seven gigabytes–that’s close to half of the smallest iPad’s 16-gig memory capacity.

No problem, says New Yorker Deputy Editor Pam McCarthy, who oversaw the production of the new app. She says it’s going on a diet, soon.

Both the New Yorker and Wired have the same weight problem for the same reason: They are built on the back of an Adobe (ADBE) program that essentially functions as an image reader.

That is, each page of the magazine is turned into the equivalent of several big photos. Which means an image-rich layout at Wired or a page of text at the New Yorker both consume a lot of memory.

The New Yorker could fix that overnight by presenting the text using HTML code, McCarthy says. That would use much less memory and allow the magazine to do things like resize the type. But for the moment, Adobe doesn’t have the ability to break up HTML text into individual pages. Instead, the text scrolls down the screen, a la the popular Instapaper app.

That sounds pretty good to me, but McCarthy says it’s not a good way to read the very long pieces her magazine is famous for. “It’s pretty clear that when you have a 10,000-word story, smooth scrolling is not a good option,” she says.

So for now, the New Yorker presents small items, like its “Talk of the Town” pieces, via HTML, and presents its long stories on individual pages. Once Adobe figures out how to break up HTML text into individual pages, McCarthy will make the switch, she says. Perhaps in a month.

“The goal is to be all HTML, and we will be,” she says.

Great!

But take note, grumblers: You probably still won’t be able to download the magazine wirelessly. Apple caps wireless app downloads at 20 megabytes, and the app is unlikely to shrink that much soon, which means you’re going to need a Wi-Fi connection to get your hands on the app.

And the fact that Condé Nast can’t yet sell subscriptions for its mag apps, which would let it knock the $4.99 issue price down considerably, has nothing to do with tech limits. That’s an issue between Apple (AAPL) and the publishing industry, and that may still take some time to sort out.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://twitter.com/zseward Zach Seward

    Ah, thanks, this indirectly answers a question I had about the New Yorker app, which is why the Talk pieces scroll, whereas the features are paginated. The scrolling experience is so much better. Not to mention copying and pasting text, etc.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Yeah I prefer it as well. And note that Conde’s apps built in-house, like GQ, do allow for a scrolling view. I understand why print pubs would be inclined to keep their digital version in the same format, but I wonder if readers will come to insist on something different.

  • Anonymous

    Not quite sure why the “lack of subscription” limits the price to $4.99; I could see if they wanted to price it less than $.99/issue they’d need a subscription, but they could price it at .99 or $1.99 etc. if they wanted to.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Yes, I could put that better. They could price it anyway they’d like, you’re correct. But they’re not going to offer substantial discounts to cover price until they can offer subscriptions.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1355612740 Thierry Lagueux

    I would like to also point out that magazine buyers don’t really have a good storage solution on the iPad. I bought all Paris-Match issues since they started on the iPad, and now I look at all those magazines and wonder when exactly am I going to go out of free space. I mean, they don’t even provide the size information. It looks like I would have to trash the app, and reinstall it to get rid of the mags. Bye-bye to all my purchases. Newsweek is the same.

    I bought two books so far, and I can see the epub files in the iTunes directory, but for magazines there is no file to share. That’s just a shame…

  • Anonymous

    Ask publishers if they’re happy with Adobe’s solution, and you’ll get unanimous ‘yes’ votes. This publishing solution is open to whoever devotes design resources to an iPad aspect ratio, and it’s as easy as cake pie to export the InDesign doc to the digital format.

    I’m on the prerelease for their new tools, and I have to say that Adobe gives publishers the option to create lighter issues, and have for the last 2-3 months.

    This writer should do more research with the users that matter to Adobe, the publishers. Readers are not Adobe’s customers here, a seasoned writer should know this.

  • Anonymous

    The only problem is the file size is pretty much prohibitive to getting say, a year subscription. With the Wired app, you still have to download 400-450 MB issues. With Popular Science plus, it’s only about 150 MB (average) per issue and the app now has an “archive” feature where you can compress the issues to save space until you want to read a previous issue again. Supposedly Apple’s got a plan to set up E-newspapers, so stay tuned.

  • http://danny-ipad-case-review.myopenid.com/ Danny – iPad Case Review

    It’s sad as i don’t want to fill up my hard drive with just old issues of wired. Although if they do get to reduce the size it would be nice to be able to have a flick through old issues on a lazy sunday…

  • http://betterness.net/ kawika

    For those inclined (such as myself), using Instapaper to bookmark the print versions of New Yorker stories pretty much solves the problem. Browse online, pick articles you want to read later, do so with no ads and all the scrolling you want.

    No doubt magazines and newspapers loathe losing control of the form and placement of their articles, but I love having hundreds of long-form stories at the ready on my iPhone, iPad, and Kindle.

    Sometimes I wonder if publishers are making these trials harder than necessary.

  • http://twitter.com/apphacker App Hacker

    Doesn’t wifi qualify as ‘wireless’? Did you mean they cap app downloads over carrier transmission?

  • http://twitter.com/ARJWright Antoine RJ Wright

    Or, they could have made the “app” in HTML to begin with and wouldn’t have to reinvent things later. Or even did the app one part in native code and the content as HTML similar to the Help Docs on Apple’s devices. Oh well, it’s early in the tech (even though touch tablet interfaces are older than me).

  • Anonymous

    It might be helpful and educational to refer to the amount of data that can be held on a device like an iPad or iPhone as “storage” rather than “memory”.

    The confusion of the two (storage/disk-space vs memory) on traditional desktop and laptop machines is only worsened by referring to the storage area on this class of devices as memory.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Jeff.Faria Jeff Faria

    Growing pains. If the subscription problem and the size could be addressed, I’d gladly get an iPad JUST as a means to read WIRED. In fact, if Conde Nast were to offer a deal on back issues ported to iPad…

  • Anonymous

    It’s a great point that media companies have to seriously consider usability when it comes to transforming publications into apps. Such huge file sizes and long download times have to also be affecting consumer adoption. I work for Kony Solutions (mobile solutions provider), and these types of heavy mobile apps do exactly the opposite of their intended purpose. Instead of creating a long-lasting brand presence right there on the home screen, these apps will be deleted quickly in order to conserve memory. As such, advanced content presentation and intuitive navigation have to be top of mind for media companies looking to really create a functional app and a user-friendly experience.

  • Anonymous

    It’s a great point that media companies have to seriously consider usability when it comes to transforming publications into apps. Such huge file sizes and long download times have to also be affecting consumer adoption. I work for Kony Solutions (mobile solutions provider), and these types of heavy mobile apps do exactly the opposite of their intended purpose. Instead of creating a long-lasting brand presence right there on the home screen, these apps will be deleted quickly in order to conserve memory. As such, advanced content presentation and intuitive navigation have to be top of mind for media companies looking to really create a functional app and a user-friendly experience.

  • http://tdhurst.com tdhurst

    No. C’mon, you know they meant 3G.

  • http://twitter.com/philpowell Phil Powell

    Aside from the horribly inappropriate use of technology (displaying text as images is just dumb and inefficient), this is a horrible accessibility problem: it means that these magazine apps are pretty much unusable for many disabled users.

    And there’s really no need to use HTML. And there’s no need to have to compromise and use text scrolling. There’s a technology which allows for portable reading of rich media content, whilst maintaining precision layouts, and even maintains accessibility. It’s been around for a while.

    It’s called PDF. It’s an open format, and it was created by Adobe. Duh.

  • http://twitter.com/pieterclaerhout Yellow Duck

    Am I wrong or is a big part of this filesize due to the multimedia content embedded in each edition? If you look at Wired, there are many high-definition movies and sounds in there which will probably be the biggest chunk of the total filesize, no?

  • http://www.facebook.com/dale.edmonds Dale Edmonds

    What about Zinio? I have bought easily three times as many magazines on my ipad as I have at the newsstand simply because I can keep them all in one app’s library and they’re generally fairly small for the quality. I have deleted a bunch of older issues because I know I can always reload them again if I want. It’s not as interactive, although you can have videos and cross-linking, but it is pretty damn awesome.

  • http://www.powershiftermedia.com/blog jaypiddy

    They all remind me of CD Roms of the 90′s. Publishers love this Adobe tool because they think they don’t have to re-imagine the magazine format and industry. It’s a quick fix that won’t last. We all know that industries hate change. The music industry refused to change and tried to sue their way out. Change or die…they have not made a real attempt on change and are trying the lazy “Export to iPad” shortcut to see if it sticks. When this fails maybe will will start to see some innovation within the industry.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Yup.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    multimedia is a big part of it, but the image reader issue is another. That’s why the New Yorker, which is much more restrained than Wired when it comes to video, images, etc is still a big file.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XYF3QSKFNHJ6PSNNHJBRFTT7AM Joe

    Something tells me Pam McCarthy has never heard of tagged PDFs. Nor has her rep at Adobe, the company that invented them.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

While it’s tempting to see the Huffington Post’s Pulitzer as a “big win for new media,” or something like that, the real story is that these organizations — the Huffington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post — are becoming more like each other. Old media and new media are increasingly antiquated terms.

— Journalism professor Jay Rosen to HuffPo media writer Michael Calderone (via GigaOM)