Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Maybe It's Not Cord-Cutting, But Cord-Nevers: TV Ownership Drops

Americans watch more TV than ever. Except for the Americans who don’t have TVs at all any more: Nielsen says the percentage of American homes with TV sets has declined to 96.7 percent, from 98.9 percent last year.

The numbers will kick off another round of debate about cord-cutting, cord-shaving, and cord-nevers–young ‘uns who grew up watching Google’s YouTube, Hulu, Netflix, etc., and have never found a reason to get a TV.

This last group is getting particular scrutiny from the TV executives I talk to, who generally remain convinced that only a very vocal minority of people have ditched TV for the Internet. But many of those same executives fret that a new generation of video watchers may never embrace TV, period.

Here’s Nielsen’s description for the drop, which includes rationales that will please both the “cord-cutting’s a myth”/”no it’s not” camps:

1) Digital Transition: The summer of 2009 marked a significant milestone with a shift from analog to digital broadcasting. Following the transition, consumers were only able to view digital broadcasts via a set with a built-in digital tuner (i.e., a newer TV set) or an analog TV set connected to a digital-to-analog converter box, cable or satellite. TV penetration first dipped after this transition; the permanence of this trend was acknowledged in 2010 after the number of TV households did not rebound over time.
2) Economics: As with previous periods of belt-tightening, the cost of owning a TV is a factor in this UE decline; TV penetration first saw sustained decreases in second quarter 2009. Lower-income, rural homes were particularly affected.
3) Multiple Platforms: Nielsen data demonstrates that consumers are viewing more video content across all platforms—rather than replacing one medium with another. However, a small subset of younger, urban consumers are going without paid TV subscriptions. Long-term effects of this are unclear, as it’s undetermined if this is also an economic issue, with these individuals entering the TV marketplace once they have the means, or the beginning of a larger shift to viewing online and on mobile devices.

To sum up: This is either a temporary blip–like the last drop, back in 1992–or it’s not. Commence the debate, again!

Shameless self-promotion time: I’ll be discussing this very issue next week at the Streaming Media East conference when I moderate a cord-cutting panel with some excellent participants from MTV, Starz, Roku and NBA Digital. Please stop by if you’re there.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    My wife and I cut the cable and satellite many years ago. 95% wasn’t worth watching. We sold the big screen long before the ATSC conversion and had a 9″ TV for emergency news fed by an outdoor VHF/UHF antenna. When NTSC went away, we didn’t get a converter for it, but instead invested in an EyeTV ATSC USB tuner for emergency news. That’s been tested and packed away in case we ever need it–nothing worth watching on network television, either.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bobsentell Bob Sentell

    My kids may end up being in that group, (I myself may be in that group). We only have Netflix; no cable, DirecTV, etc. We treat our 37″ LCD on the TV stand as an additional monitor. We have the Blu-ray connected to it and the ATV is connected to it. But we never watch other programming on it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bobsentell Bob Sentell

    But to comment on the economics issue: this recession has gone on for an extended period of time. Even when it finally ends, how many of those younger, poorer people who went so long without a paid TV sub will see a need to get one?

  • Anonymous

    Younger? Poorer? How ’bout us old folks? No cable or sat bill. We keep minimum landline phone service (without long distance) for 911 and because it gets us $15/month 768k DSL. We share one vehicle and one pre-paid phone, using less than 1,000 minutes/$100/year (and only buy 3G iPad time as needed for travel).

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IDX5YLTQC3RLTLT4QOPSYXAIWA vettman

    imDisqus: I assume you don’t need live, local HD sports which ties fans to cable, and you don’t need the entertainment value of watching HD movies on a large display, things I cannot live without.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=692271649 Luis Eduardo Gutierrez

    We need an Apple solution

  • Anonymous

    I got rid of satellite service a few months ago and don’t really miss it. I put up an antenna and got a dual tuner card for the media center pc. With that streaming to my xbox in addition to netflix and hulu plus, I save about 100 a month. Don’t miss the fee for the dvr and hd. I’ll miss the sports but with Sirius, I can listen to the Packers win it all again next season.

  • nick price

    43.2 million homes will have Internet connected tv’s by 2015

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    What percent do you think will be connected to the Web? My guess is about 50%.

  • hawkhill

    We haven’t had TV for 3 years now, there wasn’t anything on really. I wouldn’t have a phone but we need 911. Can’t afford either anymore.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Facebook bought the thing that is hardest to fake. It bought sincerity.

— Paul Ford, writing about FaceTagram in New York Magazine