Facebook Boldly Annexes the Web

The most confusing thing about the so-called “social Web” has been that it’s too often thought of as an entirely separate Web unto itself. It’s as though Facebook and Twitter are different planets in the solar system — digital orbs that we can shuttle to and from with the flick of a click. And, sometimes, it’s almost as if they aren’t even in the same cyber-galaxy.

Until today.

That’s because Facebook today advanced its “Open Graph” integration with the rest of the Web, releasing a new set of media-oriented features, and finally tying its own planet inextricably to — if not outright annexing — the rest of the digital universe.

Over the last several months, as a Beta partner in this initiative, it’s become clear to me that this is far more than just an end-user feature. If you look closely at these enhancements, and use them — as I have — you realize that Facebook is making a giant leap forward in the media cosmos; and you sense, meanwhile, that Google could easily be left on its Earth-bound launchpad, held back by commercial gravity.

What makes all this so Earth-shattering?

Simply said, with a few extra lines of code on any Web page, Facebook now becomes the hub for every user’s action — watching a video, reviewing a recipe, clicking a page, reading an article, and much more.

But beyond that, those same lines of code are driving a powerful and fundamental transition underneath the pages themselves: transforming them from the bits and bytes of HTML code, text, and images into much-needed, and much sought-after, meaning. In essence, Facebook is taking these enhancements and initiating the first major advance in deciphering the Internet since the hyperlink itself.

And, in the process, Facebook is confirming the fact that it’s the new and undisputed “social operating system” on today’s people-centric Web.

To be sure, Facebook now controls the ebb and flow of human connectivity, interpersonal sharing and relationships on the Internet.

The end result is that Facebook will now do what Google can’t. Or, put another way, Facebook will now be able to fulfill Google’s very own mission better than Google itself can, succeeding at a whole new level of organizing and making accessible all the world’s information — not to mention its activities and human participants.

A Networked Rosetta Stone for the Semantic Web

With the new enhancements for its “custom” Open Graph, Facebook will now be wiring its Web to capture every page, every user action, and, eventually, every significant detail — all recorded and categorized.

Unlike previous notable attempts to predict, or even define, a “semantic” Web — a Web where actions and objects are identified, categorized, and have meaning — I believe that Facebook’s will succeed. At first, however, it will do this one action and object at a time, gradually adding each one into its ever-expanding repertoire.

For its semantic approach, Facebook has two incredible advantages: it knows the people of the Web intimately; and, unlike any other system in the world, it records a true timeline of activity.

Let’s look at the people. Facebook knows more about most people than even top law enforcement agencies.

For activities, though, its vocabulary may start out relatively basic; but already it forms the structure to identify what actions can be applied to what entities.

As for the objects themselves, Facebook has initiated a data collection system that will populate the world’s largest representation of things.

Ultimately, however, Facebook will succeed where others have failed for one even more powerful reason than structure, and that’s because it offers a compelling incentive to the millions of parties who will provide this data: By participating, publishers will increase their traffic in the form of clicks from other users earned via meaningful semantic data instead of SEO acrobatics — and Facebook is one of the top traffic suppliers on the Web. Never before has anyone offered such a valuable payback for codifying all the world’s information systematically. And, in the process, Facebook is leveraging subject matter experts on every topic in the universe.

This approach means we are creating relationships; not between words, the way previous semantic Web conceptions have conceived of them, but between real people and objects. Everyone, even a basic rules engine, can figure out that I have a mother (who doesn’t?). But Facebook will know something far more important: whether I send her a birthday card annually (I do), or whether I make her dinner weekly (she wishes!).

Just as importantly, Facebook has the cooperation of 750 million people around the world, each of whom is recording some portion — the portion they want to share — of their lives in Facebook.

So, while the traffic and social capital accrue to the participating publishers and users, the greatest asset — the massively linked database of all the world’s information and most of online humanity’s activities — becomes proprietary to Facebook itself.

In sum, this is an incredibly bold play that the world has never conceived of before.

The Most Valuable Data in the Universe

And the resulting Facebook database will have similarly unprecedented value. Beyond the value of Facebook’s existing social capabilities, it has the potential to power the greatest discovery engine since the power of sight itself.

By knowing us intimately — who we are, what we do, and what our interests are — Facebook is in a position to answer our every desire. Yes, we populate its dataset, but Facebook’s dataset can also populate our lives, by suggesting movies, music, reading, restaurants, and, increasingly, ideas and answers. This massive dataset not only knows us and our friends, but it can use our similarities to people we won’t ever know to help intuit what’s of value to us.

More than just a social engine for the document Web, Facebook is creating a new engine that powers a whole new Web, one where search and social are fully integrated into a complete service.

This service leaves open one critical question: Will Google’s flat document-oriented search approach maintain its value going forward?

Of course, it will take a while before Facebook’s dataset is fully populated — and even longer for it to be completely codified. But Facebook, already the de facto identity server for 750 million people online, will now start amassing point data for each of the billions of objects in the real world. And these first steps will start transforming a social operating system that links people to one that links our whole world together, people and objects.

To Know Me Is To Speak My Language

In this moment-to-moment process of data accumulation, Facebook will start defining and dimensionalizing a digital world filled with links and pages, as well as an ever-expanding catalogue of billions and billions of choices and decisions made on the Web.

This will help Facebook truly know us, and know us in our real context. We exhibit behavior, and have relationships with the world, and Facebook will now be able to thread these fairly seamlessly, using longitudinal knowledge.

If you read articles in the New York Times, for instance, Facebook will begin to know your interests, your views, your reading habits, your diversity of views, your passions and pursuits, as well as the friends you share the material with. It will know what you encounter — and also what you want to encounter.

This is a massive change from the status quo.

The world’s most popular search engine — Google — uses a flat, transactional search. It can’t tell if “lobster” means you want to read about lobster, cook a lobster, or find a lobster restaurant. And it certainly doesn’t have any way to correlate last week’s lobster recipe with this week’s. But Facebook can link all the activities together. It will know that you cooked a lobster and, further down the road, how well the meal went. It will then be able to include you in circles with other gourmands and seafood enthusiasts, and to offer you the opportunity for a host of customized shared experiences that only start with the kitchen.

The net is that, until now, we’ve lived in the Web’s world; but a fully integrated Open Graph will allow the Web to finally live in our world. This is the power of digital intimacy. And it’s coming closer and closer. The issue is no longer whether we’ll be known by our digital companion; it’s how well we’ll be known.

The importance of this cannot be underestimated — because being known is a huge human drive and need, and technology has thus far never been able to cross this digital divide. Google’s sorting and searching just hasn’t gotten us there; but Facebook’s relationship building between people and objects now can.

Ben Elowitz (@elowitz) is co-founder and CEO of next-generation web publisher Wetpaint, and author of the Digital Quarters blog about the future of digital media. Prior to Wetpaint, Elowitz co-founded Blue Nile (NILE).


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sunvirg Sunvir Gujral

    what a bunch of gobbledygook…makes you wonder if these people ever get away from in front of their computer screens.

  • http://www.swift2.blogspot.com Swift2

    Little bit too much of the PR release. Prove it.

  • http://about.adrianshort.co.uk/ Adrian Short

    The article doesn’t address the most pertinent question – if Facebook succeeds will this be a good thing? A proprietary omniscient web sounds like a jolly bad idea to me.

  • http://twitter.com/mrtopf Christian Scholz

    and another question: Will people really do this? I mean, why would I want to post every lobster recipe to Facebook, even if it’s automatic? It also first needs to be proven that this automatic posting really does work for people. I myself don’t feel like it, I’d rather click a button extra to do this. And as soon as some embarrassment happened to somebody he will most probably also switch that off again. Just telling developers that they should make sure that a user is proud of an update and not surprised might be not enough. 

    The crowdsourcing of creating ontologies is of course an interesting idea but still some organizing will be left (e.g. where is the difference between magazine and newspaper, will there be a category on top of it? etc.). 

    So we will see how that goes. While I am usually a big fan of experimenting and not directly see privacy concerns I am not sure I will stay that way. The power in that data set might be growing a bit too big for a single company to handle. 

  • Anonymous

    Sounds too good, but only one problem – do users want facebook to organize and record their private information. Facebook will be self destroyed in time.

    And if facebook provides perfect platform to organize, everything in the world will look like facebook, it will be boring to death with no innovation.When Google want to organize information, it is public information without killing innovation of others.

  • http://youarekillingme.net steveray

    yet another question, how does this translate to revenue and profitability? Not saying it doesn’t, but the name of the game isn’t data accumulation – there are diminishing marginal returns to advertisers with every new pixel FB gains about us going forward.  Google is much much further ahead in understanding how data translates to revenue, how to incent content producers, etc.

  • http://twitter.com/NZN Enzion Xavier

    Wow Ben, you’re a real dweeb aren’t you? That is the most sensational review of Facebook I have ever read. You sound like a proud mother watching her son get married to a girl you can hardly believe he scored. Over the top glee!Go for it. Jump in to that kool-aid elixir you just whipped up over there. It is certainly a defining moment. There is a brand of Human being captured and defined on Facebook. It has a purpose. It has an end game. And the process being used to capture you is genius. But at the end of the day, you are a sucker. And that model over there on Facebook is just not cool. Or should I say ‘not hot’.I don’t know if Google “gets it” enough to matter, but there is going to come a time when this path will cease being the only path where engineering brilliance is unequivocally defining what kind of Human you are through participation in a system design that you do not understand, do not control, and do not have the power to make yourself sovereign through anymore.I hope you put your kids on the site…post there pics, tell their stories, get them an account and timeline them with every member of your family. One day you will be revered in a way you clearly can not imagine.

  • http://twitter.com/trronning Tim Ronning

    My oh my, here to? Wanted to +1 this but a button was nowhere to be found… How fitting.

  • Alan Gamble

    George Orwell was right. This is scary stuff and I hope that people understand the dangers involved.

  • Anonymous

    I am scared Facebook will own my history and track my history, and there will be NO WAY TO GET OUT.

    The fact that I am logged into Facebook, they can track and record all the sites and what I do on these sites.

    The only way out this, will be to stop using Facebook. For a lot of people, it will be too late when they realize it.

    Google+ hopefully does not follow this, even if it does, they support data liberation.

  • http://chiefspace.com Ben Alteri

    “the massively linked database of all the world’s information and most of online humanity’s activities — becomes proprietary to Facebook itself”
    I do appreciate Facebook for being a pioneer and getting the world to pay attention and for enabling anyone to have a voice.  But these are all things that we had before Facebook.  This new road map of Facebook is waaay out of line.  Can anyone list the good that can come out of this new ideology that Facebook is now ramming down our throats?  I know some good will come of it.  But at what expense?  I do have a Facebook account.  But I am slowly working towards converting my account to a business page.  I hardly use it other than to spark some conversation some times.  But I don’t use it every minute of every day like they are claiming we all do.  How much user engagement do they need to pull this off anyway?  And what exactly are they trying to do?  Can’t they just be an advertising platform and call it a day?  I don’t like these world conquering organizations.  We don’t need one company to have all this much information.  Make your own blog and use Google+ and Twitter.

  • http://vectorbloom.com VectorBloom

    I don’t know, there used to be this concept called ‘God’ an all knowing being that knew everything we thought and did, I guess Facebook is working to replace that. 

  • Dario de Souza Belo Marques

    Facebook is trying to overcompensate for the fact that they do not have SEARCH. So instead of search the web they are letting you search for your interests through your friends interests. It’s a media platform now. They want to keep you locked and bolted to their website, lots of ad revenue depends on it. Their future depends on it.

    Here’s the analysis:

    https://plus.google.com/106352275471397691972/posts/j7mFTSMVZGy

  • Jacob Hagen

    Google works just fine. I mean, maybe not for someone stupid enough to just type ‘lobster’ in the search bar expecting to find a recipe. Try “lobster recipe”. 

    On a more important note—where is the mystery and fun in life when you have everything being recommended, sourced, and tracked by Facebook? Turn of the computer and go do something different. Stop reacting and start thinking, doing, and dreaming on your own. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_APNR7FTC5FBYFKOBLPWU3ZMXLM Keith

    They already uploaded every person defined in wiki and count them as subscribers.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4CCLBFOKHFPDW4ORPUEHPWR2PE C

    Dr Pangloss is alive and well.

Must-Reads from other Web sites

Camille Dodero

“Gary Jones” Wants Your Nudes

Jenna Wortham

Are We Addicted to Facebook? It’s Complicated.

Brad Stone and Douglas MacMillan

How Mark Zuckerberg Hacked the Valley

Dominique Browning

Why Cell Phones Are Bad for Parenting

Alex Ben Block

Why Kids’ TV Is Scrambling to Stay Afloat

About Voices

Along with original content and posts from across the Dow Jones network, this section of AllThingsD includes Must-Reads From Other Web Sites — pieces we’ve read, discussions we’ve followed, stuff we like. Six posts from external sites are included here each weekday, but we only run the headlines. We link to the original sites for the rest. These posts are explicitly labeled, so it’s clear that the content comes from other Web sites, and for clarity’s sake, all outside posts run against a pink background.

We also solicit original full-length posts and accept some unsolicited submissions.

Voices is edited by Beth Callaghan.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »