Walt Mossberg

Recent Columns by Walt Mossberg

Mossblog

First Impressions of the New Apple iPad

It’s about the software, stupid. While all sorts of commentators were focusing on how much Apple’s new $499 iPad tablet computer looks like an oversized iPhone, the key to whether it can be the first multi-function tablet to win wide public acceptance probably lies in whether consumers perceive it as a suitable replacement for a laptop in key scenarios. And that, in my view, depends heavily on the software and services that flow through its handsome little body.

I have only spent a short time hands-on with the iPad–too short to fully run it through its paces and formally review it yet. But, after attending the rollout of the new device today, and trying out some of its features for myself, I have some first impressions.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs positioned the iPad as belonging to a new category of device between the smartphone and the laptop (since the netbook, in his view and mine, is really just a small, cheap laptop). But, as the demos unfolded, I kept thinking it was more like a hybrid of the two. 

It uses the iPhone’s basic user interface and physical design. But, taking advantage of a 9.7″ screen and a fast Apple-designed processor, the iPad adds some user interface elements and functionality that aren’t available–or at least typical–on smart phones, but look more like computer software. For instance, its photo program works more like iPhoto on a Mac than the photo app on an iPhone, and it will be available with a touch version of Apple’s iWork productivity suite, which is Apple’s take on Microsoft Office. This is a much more powerful program than the phone-based office suites for the iPhone or BlackBerry, and Apple (AAPL) is only charging $30 for it.

Also, Apple has rewritten most of the core iPhone apps so they look more like, and have more of the features of, Mac or PC programs. But they aren’t mere clones of full computer apps. For instance, many forego standard menus for clever overlays and sidebars that work more naturally with the iPad’s multi-touch interface. Other app developers can do this, too. But, even if they don’t, the company said the iPad will run most of the current 140,000 iPhone apps, either in a small window on the screen, or in a full-screen mode. That’s a huge plus for a new device.

Mr. Jobs said after the onstage program ended that he sees the iPad’s user interface as a fuller expression of the one on the iPhone, which had been limited by screen real estate.

And, although the reported video and music streaming services were nowhere to be seen at this preview, Mr. Jobs did offer a taste of how the iPad could deliver content, beyond simply downloads from the iTunes store. He showed off a new e-book reader app with built-in online book store that, visually at least, blew away the Amazon (AMZN) Kindle, even if it seemed to lack all of the Kindle’s features and may have a smaller catalog. Representatives of the New York Times (NYT) showed an iPad digital version of their newspaper that seemed vastly more usable than the clumsy version now on the Kindle and its ilk.

So, the iPad is more than just a giant iPod Touch or iPhone, even though it looks like one. But the question is, will that be enough to get consumers to shell out for it, and make it part of their daily lives? Or will it be a niche product, like Microsoft’s (MSFT) Tablet PC or Mr. Jobs’ own Apple TV?

On the plus side, the device is handsome, feels comfortable and solid to hold, and has all that beautiful software built in. Oh, and it’s amazingly low-priced for an Apple product, with that modest $499 price tag for a base version with 16 gigabytes of memory and Wi-Fi, but no cell phone data connectivity. (A fully loaded model with 64 gigabytes, Wi-Fi and a no-contract 3G cellular data plan is $829, and there are variations in between.)

It also boasts a decent 10 hours of battery life, and Mr, Jobs told me after the event that, for some functions, like playing video and music, the battery should last even longer. 

But there are minuses. First, since it’s too big to go in a pocket, people might perceive it as just another thing to carry around, despite the fact that it’s only a half inch thick and weighs just 1.5 pounds. It also lacks a common and popular laptop feature–a web cam. So, it can’t be used for video chats or for the creation of web videos.

Steve Jobs behind the iPad's virtual keyboard.

Also, the carrier for the iPad’s 3G plan is the deeply unpopular AT&T–there were groans and boos among Mr. Jobs’ otherwise excited audience when this was announced. AT&T is offering bargain prices for iPad data service compared to what it charges laptop owners. But its network is overwhelmed in many big cities and many iPhone lovers, who are strong candidates to buy an iPad, curse the carrier daily.

Finally, while it’s too early for me to say without lots of testing, the size of the iPad’s virtual keyboard may be a liability. I found it almost too wide for thumb typing, and a colleague who’s a whiz at touch typing and tried it briefly found it awkward to type on. Apple is offering an auxiliary physical keyboard that docks with, and charges, the iPad. But you won’t want to lug that around.

Still, the software looked impressive, and that could help Steve Jobs do the one thing even he has never done in an amazing career: get the public to love not just a better version of an existing type of gadget, but a whole new category of gadget.

iPad Event Slideshow

1 of 33  Back  Next
Steve Jobs introduces the new iPad.

Steve Jobs introduces the new iPad.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.catchingzebra.com Andy

    Sir, you make a very good point.

  • http://rvxtm.com/ RvX™

    Waiting to see this out and in use (available to buy), the iPad may look like a nice device now, but the future for this kind of devices may or may not last. I mean, where do you see this one in like 2-3 years from now.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve gotten used to typing on the iPhone keyboard so I wish Apple will include an option to SHRINK the virtual keyboard to iPhone size. That way you can hold the iPad with one hand and type with the other. The almost-full-sized keyboard tempts you to type with both hands, but then you have to hold the iPad on your lap or put it on a desk.

  • inverse137

    You were on the Audio/Video squad in High School, weren't you?

  • Anonymous

    Walt (Mossberg) and Steve (Jobs) seem to be missing the point-the TABLET was supposed to be about books but no mention of how many the IPad can hold has been made. Even the 64 GB version could fill up in a hurry. A book without a map to locate the action is only part of the story. Supposedly we can sync our IPad with our Mac so do we need another huge boost in our computer storage to account for hundreds of books? Info indicates only one program can run on an IPad at a time. How then do we have instant access to maps and the dictionary?
    The Kindle excited my interest in Ebooks but it is woefully short of meeting my expectations in the concept. Mr. Jobs: What I want is to be able to buy an Ebook for about the same as the paperback version-and be able to share it with close friends as I now do with the paperback. Oh Yes, I want the maps and dictionary immediately available along with the page in the book I’m reading. Forget the things I already have on my IPhone and IMac. They may be nice but will not convince me to buy an IPad. I carried about ten pounds of books on a recent 7-week trip to China, Bhutan, Nepal and Burma. One-fourth of my airline baggage allowance was taken up by books. I want a 1.5 pound IPad to have my complete library for my next trip.

  • Anonymous

    I think apple lost their way from previous innovations. Someone – Mossberg, the times or the Wash Post said a while ago the unknown tablet would have the following characteristics: (1) Cost more than anyone would believe was reasonable; (2) People would line up outside to buy it; (3) Have one feature you never knew you needed; (4) would be missing one feature you never knew you could do without; (5) some competitor would have to eat their words when they bad mouthed the product.I think they set the entry price way too low and by doing so left out a camera and some other clever toys (eg., extra port for commercial apps) that would have grabbed our attention. I think they violated their pricing model for two reasons: First, Jobs probably had a greater vision (he always does) but the economic slow down messed up vendor product development. Second, they are conflicted between being a technology company and being an Amazon. They should have never started down the exclusive book pathway because it forced them to set low prices to get devices in people’s hands. If they had stuck with the model then the app developers would have solved the book issue and Apple would have still gotten their iTunes fee. None of this makes the device bad – it just makes it a yawn given how long we have all waited and our high expectations for Apple’s creativity.

  • http://lead-generation-expert.blogspot.com megaresp

    When I first heard about this, I assumed it would run OSX. At last, thought I, an inexpensive way to install the iphone SDK!

    Alas, the iPad is not aimed at geeks. I already have and love an iPhone, and aren’t interested in replicating its functionality on a larger device – especially sans phone.

    I do think it will sell though. A client of mine is a couture fashion designer, and he is can’t wait for it to go on sale here (UK).

  • Spaceflightengineer

    That is the plural in the Italian language and that version of the plural has not been adopted for the English use. Dave is correct

  • Anonymous

    I’ll buy it AND an i-phone when they dump AT&T. c’mon guys, get a decent carrier! I own a Macbook pro and a mac mini, and only wish I had an i-phone, but I need the phone I use to actually work. not just run a bunch of fancy apps. Good luck Apple, great product, too bad your carrier of choice sucks!
    Matt, Temecula, CA

  • thyname

    Yes, really, why would you need 3G? Why pay a monthly fee? Just download and have every fully loaded via your wifi at home or work, or a coffee shop, and here you go!

  • Anonymous

    I agree with what is said in the article. I’m kind of confused when it comes to determining whether or not I would actually feel comfortable with owning an iPad. How would I use it in a given days of work, would it be comfortable to use? These are things i want to have answers to when the reviews start to come out. If they’re good, I’ll have no problem with buying one.

  • Anonymous

    You have got to be kidding, Steve. This thing is fundamentally flawed. I am anxiously awaiting what the competition brings out. The only “good news” is the data pricing. This will bring pressure to provide similar data pricing for other devices. The wireless providers may have figured out that $60/month is a non-starter for most consumers for a device of most any sort.

  • Anonymous

    I think much of the criticism of the device ignores a key factor: the third party ecosystem of Apple developers and hardware add-ons. Consider how many speaker docks, cases, voice recorders, and so forth have appeared supporting the iPhone/Touch/iPod.

    I feel confident that for those wishing for video chat on iPad v1 that enterprising third party developers will offer an add-on dock port camera and app. It is possible (perhaps even likely) that Apple will add a camera for iPad v2, but the reality is that at present video chat is for the average consumer a niche activity. As such, attaching a camera for those instances (and users) who require such functionality is unlikely to be an impediment to general market acceptance in my view.

    I can imagine that some of Steve Job’s confidence in the product may stem from internal knowledge of the roadmap ahead that they are not able to disclose at this stage.

    For example, folks have asked how you would print with the iPad. I assume you would do so over WiFi to your network printer. That is what I do with my current laptop. For those without a networked printer (be it via router like the Airport Extreme/Time Capsule, or a PC with attached printer) you’d have to connect to the printer using the USB iPad dongle. Frankly, at that point the dongle isn’t much of an inconvenience since you’re effectively tethering to another device anyway.

    Likewise, I think concerns over AT&T may prove overblown if Apple opens up to other providers with the release of the next iPhone update this summer (which many analysts are anticipating). I would expect that at that time they would be in a position to also open up the iPad.

    Finally, in regards the need to dock to a computer with iTunes – I think this is sensible in that the flash storage on the iPad is more limited than that of a computer. However, if Apple releases a cloud storage solution that concern may also in future be obviated.

    I think folks need to take a more macro view in regards the potential of the iPad.

  • JohnDoey

    The Wikipedia page you refer us to says it's non-standard:

    scenarii pl
    (nonstandard, rare)

    This is off-topic, and it's unfair to people whose first language is not English, like Americans.

  • Anonymous

    Well, it does run OS X. The bottom 3/4 of Mac OS and iPhone OS are the same and that is OS X. Only the interface is different. You can get a Mac mini for about the same price as an iPad and use it with your existing PC hardware. A used Mac can be had for even less.

  • Anonymous

    I think everyone is missing the point of the iPad. It’s a color, multimedia Kindle. No more than that. Kindles and Nooks have been selling like crazy. This is Apple’s entry into that market. You can read books and newspapers and pdfs like the other two, plus you can watch movies, listen to music, and play games.

    All of the complaints I hear are about features that are also not in Kindles or Nooks. Given that those devices are selling so well, I have a hard time believing that the iPad will not do the same. (That said, most tech writers have lambasted the Kindle and Nook, too.)

    If anything, though, the iPad is suffering from Apple’s own over-positioning. Instead of coming out with a “Kindle+multimedia” device. They came out with more of a “netbook computer without a keyboard” position – even showing email, calendar, and iWorks applications. It’s on that positioning I think people are focusing.

    Jobs & Co., have over-hyped what looks to actually the best eReader I’ve seen so far.

  • Anonymous

    I think your premise that Apple charges a high price for their gear is wrong. The iPhone is $99, that is less than Palm Pixi. The Mac costs the same as comparable generic PC’s yet comes with an incredible software stack including Unix, a video editor, DVD production, multitrack music and audio production, and more. And service that is better than many I-T consultants provide. I pay less for my Apple gear than my friends who have Dells and Blackberrys and anti-virus software and I-T consultants. Logic Studio is 1/4 the price of the equivalent software for PC.

    > camera

    A friend of mine said it was missing a Webcam also, and I said “how would you use it? with it moving around in your lap, your head would be bobbing around for the other person,” and he said “you’d put the iPad in a dock on a desk to use the Webcam,” and I said “in that case why wouldn’t the camera be part of the dock? why wouldn’t the camera just plug into the dock connector?”

    iPad has an iPod dock connector and it runs App Store apps and HTML5 Web apps, so if you think something is missing from it, there will be an app for that, and/or a dock accessory. The iPad is not even out yet an there is a cable to connect to your camera, one to plug-in SD cards, there are high-end music recording microphones, AM/FM radios, all kinds of clever toys.

    So if you think it should have cost $599 with a webcam instead of $499 without, then for you there is a $499 iPad with $100 plug-in webcam.

    > They should have never started down the
    > exclusive book pathway

    The iBookstore is not exclusive, and the format of the books is standard ePub, a kind of Web document you can make with any tools.

  • Anonymous

    > no mention of how many [books] the IPad can hold
    > has been made. Even the 64 GB version could fill
    > up in a hurry.

    No, you are incorrect. eBooks have about the same file size as iPod songs. In 4 GB like the original iPod, you could hold 1000 songs or 1000 books. The 64 GB iPad will hold around 16,000 books.

    Some Kindles have less than 1 GB of storage, and the high-end Kindle DX which is $100 less than an iPad has only 4 GB. The Google Nexus One which is over $500 has only 4 GB of storage.

    The reason you have not heard the book capacity of iPad talked about is it can hold so many.

    Further, in Apple’s model, your library actually lives on your Mac/PC in iTunes, and only what you want to take with you right now goes on the iPad, same as how the iPod works. So if you can’t fit all your books on iPad, you can buy a 2000 GB disk for $199 and plug it into your Mac and keep your eBooks there and have room for 500,000 titles, and keep 16,000 on your iPad at any one time. If you need more than 500,000 titles, simply add another disk. You can certainly keep more titles in your iTunes than a typical bookstore or library.

    Traditionally, Apple has doubled the storage every year as flash storage increases in capacity, so in a couple of years when you’re ready to buy your second iPad, the storage will likely be 64 to 256 GB.

    > maps

    Maps are built-in to the iPad, same as iPod and iPhone.

    > dictionary

    There are hundreds of dictionaries for iPhone OS, including rhyming dictionaries and other esoteric ones.

    > ten pounds of books

    Plenty of room for that in an iPad, even the 16GB model.

  • Anonymous

    Apple is 33 years old, OS X is 10 years old, iPhone OS is 3 years old and iPhone OS apps are 2 years old, iPod is 9 years old, iTunes is 11 years old, iTunes Store is 6 years old, and all of these are more popular now than ever before. Apple is bigger than Google and just had their biggest financial quarter ever. This device leverages iPhone OS, and iPhone is in 70% of the Fortune 500 so the iPad is likely to be successful in business as well as homes and education. And Apple doesn’t release stuff that they aren’t committed to. This is not a test, it’s not half a product that they hope may catch on. I think you can spend $499 on an iPad to use for the next 2 years with confidence.

    I’ve read a number of books on my iPhone and I loved it in every way except the screen is so small you have to turn the page about 1000 times for a typical novel. This should be a great reader, and it’s capable of running books with full motion video, audio, animations in them.

  • Anonymous

    There will be iPad cases with cameras in them, same as there are iPod cases with cameras in them, and batteries in them, and so on.

    Think of the iPad as the core of any other device you want. Whatever is missing wraps around the iPad. Same as how the iPhone slips into a holder and becomes a Garmin GPS.

  • Anonymous

    Scrolling with touch and pushing the Web’s buttons with your fingers is completely awesome. Puts a mouse to shame. Puts flipping through a newspaper to shame.

  • Anonymous

    The cheapest iPad with 3G is $629, not $499, and it doesn’t have GPS or a camera. You’re also comparing the mid-2010 iPad to the mid-2009 iPhone.

  • Anonymous

    > 2) Multitasking – It’s not a computer if it can’t
    > multitask

    iPad multitasks, just not in the traditional way.

    You can run maybe 10 apps at once on a netbook, maybe only 6 at once on an Android phone. On an iPad, iPod, iPhone, you can run 50 apps within an hour, you can run hundreds of apps in a day, and that is what users do.

    The iPhone OS aggressively multitasks … it can’t let apps sit and do nothing because there are hundreds of other apps that are going to be running over top of it.

    The reason iPhone App Store is so successful is that users run MORE apps, not fewer apps, than other platforms. Think about it. If you can’t run a lot of apps, why are there 140,000 and 3 billion downloads?

    There are a small number of downsides to the way iPhone OS multitasks, such as the only music you can have in the background is the iPod. But there are hundreds of advantages: no task killer, no stalling, all apps are immediately available when you ask for them. To iPhone users, all of the apps on the device seem to be running at all times. What Computer Science people call the iPhone’s “application launcher”, users use as a switcher, they just switch between apps all day long, dozens or hundreds at a time.

    > 3) Rich web experience – It’s not sufficient if
    > there isn’t a flash player. Ipad fails this test as well.

    Are you saying iPad can’t play video? That an iPod can’t play video? Think about it.

    The video that you see running in FlashPlayer is H.264 video, the same video from iTunes Store, YouTube, Blu-Ray, iPod, iPhone, QuickTime Player. It’s the ISO standard for consumer video. The only reason you can’t see it on your iPad/iPhone/iPod/Android/Blackberry and many other devices in some cases is the website publisher has wrapped the video in a proprietary Adobe Flash presentation because they assumed you were using Windows, which is the only platform that does not have its own native H.264 video player. This is changing now that website publishers are realizing there are more Web clients than just Windows and realizing that after 3 years and no ARM-based FlashPlayer, waiting for Adobe to get their act together is not practical.

    Further, when you run the H.264 video natively, it takes literally about 5% of the battery as running it in a Flash presentation. Flash has had its day filling in for Windows not having its own H.264 video player. Browser plug-ins themselves are a thing of the past. Both Safari and Chrome play H.264 video natively like they show JPEG photos natively.

    YouTube runs on iPad. Think about it.

    > 4) Freedom
    > Install the apps from internet.

    People HATE installing apps from the Internet. That is how you get malware. You need to install apps only from a source you can 100% trust. Not only trust, but trust that they have not been spoofed and you have not been phished.

    Google has already served malware off Android Market and they have served far fewer apps than Apple. Someone created a malware for iPhone and showed it off at a hacker conference but it was impossible to deploy on iPhone and target at actual users because it failed Apple’s inspection process.

    iPhone users install hundreds of apps with almost no thought about it because they trust Apple. Not computer geek users, but people like my brother who is an ER nurse and knows nothing about computers. He studied human anatomy, not computer anatomy. Loves his iPhone.

    > Can i run ESPN360 on ipad ? No way.

    Yes way. There is an iPhone app.

    > Can I install my office VPN service ? Nope.

    Yes. There is VPN support in the OS and there are apps. You can run your Windows desktop from the office over VPN full-screen on the iPad. That has already been confirmed.

    > While App store provides safer apps, it also
    > takes away the freedom to do what you want
    > to do on your computer.

    No, it gives people who aren’t computer scientists the freedom to do what they want with their computer. They install hundreds of apps instead of installing zero apps like they do with their Windows PC. Hundreds of safe apps from App Store trumps zero apps installed on their Windows PC.

    Further, iPhone OS includes an HTML5 browser, which means that even if you never, ever use an App Store app, you have millions of open HTML5 Web apps to run. These are the apps that Chrome OS is being designed to run, the only apps it will run. Chrome is a remix of Apple’s browser.

    So if you don’t like App Store, you can still run ISO movies, ISO music, W3C Web apps, and ePub eBooks. The native apps are optional just like on every other platform.

    Consider also that Google bans a higher percentage of websites from its index than Apple rejects apps from App Store. Linus Torvalds rejects a higher percentage of Linux kernel code than Apple rejects apps from App Store.

    > By end of the day call it Ipad or whatever, people
    > need a smarter computer.

    A smarter computer is one that doesn’t require the user to learn I-T skills to use it, doesn’t require the user to understand what malware is, or what task killers are, or to understand what kind of trouble they can get into with those computer science -based tools. A smarter computer is one that is 100% safe and functional all the time, no matter what you were doing with it an hour ago. A smarter computer is one that is just as useful for doctors and artists as for computer scientists.

  • Anonymous

    > How does it print (a necessity with iWork apps,
    > I would think)?

    To network printers that are discovered via Bonjour, same as iPhones. There are apps from HP and others.

    Your iWork apps also appear to others on the network as a file share, so in some cases you may not need to print to share documents.

  • Anonymous

    Yes. It’s the same as iPhone.

  • Anonymous

    iPhone does not have a second battery … until you stick it in a Mophie Juice Pack. Then it is a bit larger but has 2 batteries. Not everyone wants this, but for those who do, it is great. That is why it’s a 3rd party add-on.

    Whatever you think the iPad is missing, imagine that device and then imagine it with a slot for your iPad to fit into it, the same way iPhone fits into dashboards and Juice Packs and stereo systems and so on.

    I would bet there are 10 iPad cameras already under development at companies who make iPhone accessories.

    There is no reason a high-end camcorder attachment could not be made, enabling you to capture HD video to your iPad.

  • Anonymous

    Apple doesn’t force carriers down your throat. There are well over 100 carriers and in most places you can choose from 2 or 3.

    In the US, there is only one carrier that can run standard GSM devices. Verizon and Sprint use their own proprietary networks that are incompatible with the rest of the world. They did that specifically to force you to buy devices from them, not from 3rd parties like Apple. If you don’t like that system, you’re not alone. But it’s 100% Verizon and Sprint’s fault, nobody else.

  • http://lead-generation-expert.blogspot.com megaresp

    Interesting. I didn't know the mac mini could run a standard PC (i.e. cheap) keyboard, mouse and monitor. That changes my view somewhat.

    I had previously dismissed it because it's a pretty modest box in PC terms for the money, and I was mentally adding on the cost of a monitor, keyboard and mouse.

    Hmmmm….

  • WillForbes39

    Thanks for your response. I completely understand your position. It is just not mine. I have a mac book air, a max book pro and cinema screens for all computers. Mac's are special because of design – both functional and aesthetic. People are willing as the market has demonstrated to pay a premium for those qualities and Apple has always understood that they reaped a premium in profit for those characteristics. The iPhone was incredibly expensive when it first arrived on the market – as was the ipod. But these were game changing devices that disrupted the marketplace.

    My point is simply that they have changed their model. I am certain that you are right that part of the reason is the kindle – so unlike previous entries Apple is not first to market.

    With regard to your camera comment. I misspoke – I meant a camera in front like a cinema screen so you can do video conference. Yes it will be an easy add-on to buy – but isn't that an anathema to the Apple design principle?

    Finally, if iBookstore were NOT exclusive then why did Apple need to sign all these deals with publishers. The content is already out there and there are many apps for reading books. Apple is courting the publishers because they are pushing the smaller folks out – reverting to a more closed system. That stifles innovation and ultimately hurts Apple.

    The one place where the market is wide open is in specialty publications with strong graphics requirements (magazines, comics, even text books). This is also the area where the iPad will ultimately flourish and where kindle et al are woefully inadequate.

    Thanks for the dialogue.
    Will

  • rmr_nyc

    1. AT&T is not the only US carrier that uses GSM, T Mobile also is GSM network and I'm sure there are others.
    In fact, my Sprint phone does both CDMA and GSM and I know for a fact that Verizon also has phones that do the same thing.
    2. Apple has an EXCLUSIVE contract with AT&T in the USA, that is a matter of simple fact.
    3. In metropolitan areas in the USA CDMA is simply a better technology, in my apartment (which is 2 blocks from a GSM cell tower) I get no signal on GSM phones and 3-4 bars on a CDMA phone.
    In my office, Verizon and Sprint users get signal, AT&T and T-Mobile customers literally have to go outside in order to make calls.
    4. Verizon and Sprint have a far greater number of subscribers than AT&T probably for the above mentioned reasons.
    Supposedly both Verizon and Sprint will have IPhones by April, and you will see AT&T's market share plummet as people move to carriers that provide more reliable service and far better network coverage.
    All that said…. the IPad is a lemon, it's too big to carry easily, too fragile to not need a case and too awkward to use while mobile. If Apple had been really on the ball they would have simply added reliable wireless capability to the Air. The IPad is roughly the same size and has far greater capabilities.

  • Anonymous

    So Verizon choose a proprietary networks but it’s Apple’s fault? No one is ramming anytihng down your throat.. don’t but the product; buy the product with just WiFi…

    Of course – as i read in a bunch of blogs, what people really want is to but the WiFi version and then get free wifi at starbucks, mcdonals, etc…

    Cake and eat it too? huh..

  • lboylesusa

    Seems to be similiar to the older but larger version of the Palm PDR. My older PDR is still useful, just too small for web surfing. The “pad” could be useful if it would have enough features to replace all the other devices we need to carry around. As a teacher, I would love to see this device incorporated into the classroom for note-taking vs. the bulk of a laptop. I think I like it very much; just don't want another “gadget” to carry with me. The Kindle and Sony's reader seem outdated already.

  • jpintobks

    I am already in line to get mine. Also as a book publisher and avid reader, I am happy that now I can read in a full size screen.
    I agree that the iPad is the killer of the Kindle since it shows now it obsolescence and side by side how mediocre Kindle became.

  • RobtELee

    It's oh so fashionable to dump on AT&T's service and/or coverage area…funny I have used my iPhone all over the US with very few problems. In addition, AT&T is feverishly upgrading the networks. Whine about something else.

  • alain55

    Here is what i wrote in my article on my Disney and more blog about the lack of webcam: There is no webcam on the IPad and this is really an unforgivable mistake. Why? Here is why: when the first IPhone appeared, back in 2007, with his new multi touch interface, suddenly it was “the future in the present”. A kind of Star Trek device which would have been teleported to the 21st century. Of course, now we don't have this feeling anymore but back three years ago this “future in the present” effect was one of the big reasons of the huge IPhone hype.

    Do we have this feeling with the IPad? No we don't. And what enrages me is that it could have been the case. Think: you're sit on a bench in a park, or in a remote place 10000 miles from your home and you want to call AND see your girl/boy friend or anyone you wish. Then, instead to take out of your bag a laptop that you need to unfold, etc… what you have is something that looks, virtually, like a piece of glass. And thanks to it – and Skype! – your girl/boy friend would magically appear even if you're up in the mountain or lost in the jungle as long as there is a 3G connection. Wouldn't it be great? Do you remember the sequence in Stanley kubrick's “2001, a Space Odyssey” when the scientist on a space station use a videophone to call on Earth his little daughter for her birthday? In the movie they were in 2001 and we are in 2010! Okay, i'm kidding, but frankly what the hell was the problem to put a web cam on the top of the IPad? It would have changed everything.

    If Steve has to learn a lesson in all this, it's this one: ALWAYS BRING THE FUTURE IN THE PRESENT, that the key of the success. And Steve better don't tell me that Apple don't have new innovations! Just go to the excellent PatentlyApple web site , a great site tracking all Apple new patents, and read the three parts article called The Tablet Prophecies HERE, HERE and HERE where you'll discover all the great inventions that Apple researchers created for a tablet device. Sure they'll come in the future, and sure, Apple keep some bullets for the IPad V2, but honestly i'm sick to have to wait for the next version, specially when what i am asking for – a webcam – is so simple…

  • terrywbreedlove

    I hope there is an iPhoto type app from Apple for the iPad. Oh and an adapter for CF cards.

  • http://intersog.com/ Artyom

    It's even better then I expected. I wasn't sure if Apple will go with Mac OSX or prefer iPhone OS. It was a tough choice to make but now looking at the result I agree with using iPhone OS as a platform for the apps. We will see lots of apps made specifically for the iPad. No doubts about it.

  • Pallkrin

    Scenario or scenari, the Notion Ink Adam PC Tablet is by far the better IPad:

    http://www.notionink.in/index.php

  • Pallkrin

    Scenario or scenari, the Notion Ink Adam PC Tablet is by far the better IPad:

    http://www.notionink.in/index.php

  • Anonymous

    in fact, there was a dinosaur named, scenariosaurus. also, a disease called scenaritus and newly discovered element called scenarium.

  • http://www.quickfreeipad.co.uk/ Free iPad

    Bring on the iPad! Can't wait!
    The best bit is I won't have to pay for it – YAY!

  • http://howtogetmyexbackways.com/ Ex Back

    hello friend i read this site and i think this is good site!

  • http://www.wickerbenchstorage.net Wicker Bench Storage

    Thanks for information, I'll always keep updated here!

Real Bonding With Family Around the TV Via Skype

January 25, 2012 at 6:03 pm PT

Track Changes on an iPad

January 25, 2012 at 6:02 pm PT

Talk Is Cheap and Reliable on Nokia’s $50 Phone

January 18, 2012 at 6:03 pm PT

Working in Word, Excel, PowerPoint on an iPad

January 11, 2012 at 6:04 pm PT

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

What’s happening is that we might, in fact, be at a time in our history where we’re being domesticated by these great big societal things, such as Facebook and the Internet. We’re being domesticated by them, because fewer and fewer and fewer of us have to be innovators to get by. And so, in the cold calculus of evolution by natural selection, at no greater time in history than ever before, copiers are probably doing better than innovators. Because innovation is extraordinarily hard.

— Mark Pagel, fellow of the Royal Society and professor of evolutionary biology, in conversation with Edge.org