Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Steve Jobs on Why Facebook Is Not Part of Apple's New Ping Music Social Network: "Onerous Terms"

Yesterday, at the Apple music event in San Francisco, I had a short chat with Apple CEO Steve Jobs as he strolled through the demo room for the media, just after he had announced various updates for the iPod, Apple TV and iTunes onstage.

One of the those was the introduction of a new social network for music called Ping that Apple (AAPL) has integrated within iTunes 10 and which looks an awful lot like the experience you get on Facebook.

Essentially, it is a vertical version–in this case for music–of the powerful social networking site.

Facebook has noodled for years about creating its own social music offering, including doing a partnership with Lala, which was bought by Apple last year and shuttered in June.

But its efforts have largely gone nowhere.

And Facebook is nowhere on Ping, either. Currently, there is no linking, sharing or participation of any kind with Facebook–or Twitter or MySpace–on Ping, which will work only on the iTunes software on computers, iPhones and iPods.

When I asked Jobs about that, he said Apple had indeed held talks with Facebook about a variety of unspecified partnerships related to Ping, but the discussions went nowhere.

The reason, according to Jobs: Facebook wanted “onerous terms that we could not agree to,” related to connecting with Facebook friends on Ping.

For those who are struck by the word, the definition of onerous, according to an online dictionary: “Involving an amount of effort and difficulty that is oppressively burdensome; Involving heavy obligations.”

Jobs did not elaborate on those troublesome terms and also would not say if Ping would incorporate connecting with Facebook or even using Facebook Connect–which would make it much easier to find friends to share music with.

“We could, I guess,” he shrugged.

And when I asked how to find friends, Jobs offered, noting iTunes had 160 million users across the globe: “You can type their names into search or send them emails inviting them to join.”

Okay, although being more open would work too!

As MediaMemo’s Peter Kafka noted:

“Maybe Apple plans on joining the rest of the Web, via an open API that will let Facebook, Twitter et al–maybe even the to-be-launched Google (GOOG) music service–play nicely with Ping. We’ll see.”

Facebook–including some execs who are definitely irked about how closely Ping resembles Facebook, right down to the blue color scheme–hopes so.

Consider the statement issued by Facebook to me–after attempts to get it verbally failed, due ironically to several dropped connections on the iPhone of the exec I spoke to:

“Facebook believes in connecting people with their interests and we’ve partnered with innovative developers around the world who share this vision. Facebook and Apple have cooperated successfully in the past to offer people great social experiences and we look forward to doing so in the future.”

In other words: Zing, Ping.

UPDATE: Oddly enough, a Facebook connection feature appeared to be in Ping when some signed up–not for me–as noted by Cult of Mac. And Silicon Alley Insider’s Dan Frommer even spotted the wording in Jobs’s stage presentation. I have an email into Apple PR asking for a comment on the change.

In any case, at the Apple event, Jobs told me he had great hopes for the social music service, adding that Ping could be the most significant thing to come out of yesterday’s announcements.

But soon enough he moved right on to the new iPods, declaring enthusiastically: “Isn’t the nano amazing?”


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://communico.co.nz Julian A Waters

    Will be interesting to see if Steve uses Ping himself.. would be cool if he does.

  • http://joostschuur.com Joost Schuur

    I got a Facebook Connect prompt to find my friends when I signed up to Ping earlier in the evenning. I even had the option to repeat that process later again. At some point later in the evening however, that Facebook option went away and all you could do was invite them by email.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Houser/596246361 Jeff Houser

    I suspect it would have to do with how facebook freely shares your information, and how Apple does not…

  • Anonymous

    why are you still whining about “apple openess”?

    either you just don’t get it or you are full of BS

  • http://www.lindeskar.se Alexander Lindeskär

    What about; “or by connecting to your Facebook account” on http://www.apple.com/itunes/ping ?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MP3SPPRDWHOEAA46KEPYIRR2AA katwomansz

    How about Facebook partnering with Amazon, Napster, Or Rhapsody? We need competition. That finally brought about the removal of DRM from stubborn Apple.

  • http://twitter.com/Fourthletter58 David Simpson

    Apple doesn’t mine and sell your data ? What planet are you from ?

  • Anonymous

    I never really thought about it that way. It makes pretty good sense.

    http://www.be-anonymous.at.tc

  • http://twitter.com/mohaas05 Kamin Horvath

    ^ No actually, they don’t.

  • http://twitter.com/mohaas05 Kamin Horvath

    I got the facebook connect button when I signed up. Of course, nobody else was on Ping yet so it wasn’t terribly useful.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dearbho Benjamin Ho

    No. incorrect. Apple only implemented DRM because of the music studios. Jobs even wrote a open letter explaining apple’s position – and asking that the studios reconsider their stance.

    Took a long time and a lot of momentum to convince the studios to change – once there was enough competition, DRM went away.

  • http://www.facebook.com/abugida Tom Ross

    AFAIR it’s against Facebook’s terms and conditions to use Connect solely for the purpose of populating a competing social network. I could be wrong though. So far, my friends list on Ping is empty, and I’m inclined to sign up to one of the handful of artists that are already on Ping. I guess we’ll have to wait a few weeks how it turns out, especially because the iOS clients look more accessible than another tab inside the monster that is iTunes for Mac/PC.

  • Anonymous

    I’d say that Facebook might also say that Apple’s term were too onerous.

    Seems Apple is one again following rather than leading anyway, as Zune’s have had this feature for years.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7CBNUCZFD64VVYOBORB6X3MWRM Kathryn Miller

    So do both Zune owners use the feature? Pretty pointless otherwise.

  • http://twitter.com/daveevans David Evans

    You can share song/album links on fb and twitter by clicking the down arrow next to the price.

  • http://ottodestruct.com Otto

    Right now, if you go to Ping and don’t follow anybody, it says right there on the screen: “You are not following anyone. Connect with Facebook, search for people, invite friends, or follow recommended people to get started.”

    However, I can find no way to make it connect with Facebook.

  • http://www.smallfish-bigpond.com/ Kerensky97

    Facebook wanted onerous terms that we could not agree to. Isn’t that the Pot calling the Kettle black?

    I’m not a fan of Facebook either but if I had to choose between that and a closed iTunes solution I’d grudgingly accept Facebook.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe that’s why Apple is the most successful tech company in the world, but who knows.

  • Anonymous

    Did you say Zune? Lol.

  • Anonymous

    No they don’t. This is why app developers get frustrated with Apple most of the time. If their app so much has hints at accessing user data without their approval, that app gets rejected. Developers hate this.

  • http://isthisreallynecessary.com someToast

    Jokes aside, just because there was a ecosystem-specific social music network with Zune, does that mean that there can be no other ecosystem-specific social music network ever? I should hope not.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7SZ6SJUKKBJWKTFD6SX72HIMPY Timothy Burgin

    Actually DRM free music was used by the recording industry to get Apple to charge higher prices for their music. They let Amazon have DRM free stuff for a long while, and only let Apple have it after negotiating a new contract with them. And oddly enough the recording industry used DRM free music to create more competition with iTunes.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent sarcasm, sir.

    Zune is one of my all-time favorite punch lines in any context.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7SZ6SJUKKBJWKTFD6SX72HIMPY Timothy Burgin

    Um, how is Facebook open?? And even with a “closed iTunes solution” I’d happily choose a social network with easy to manage privacy settings (iTunes/Ping) over a company with blatant disregard for its users privacy.

  • kibbles

    @kat – totally ignorant. jobs wrote an open letter to the *music industry* to get them to drop their DRM requirements from the music store. you can thank jobs for that. not amazon or walmart.

  • kibbles

    ah yeah, theyre total followers, especially with these markets: desktop computing, case design, media players, music stores, cell phones, app stores, tablet devices.. never pioneered nuttin’, no siree..

  • Anonymous

    No, Apple doesn’t mine and sell your data. That is one of the major features of being an Apple user. That is why Apple’s products aren’t free and fly-by-night. They’re not hit-and-miss data mining operations.

    Apple makes their money the honest way: when you buy a device, and then buy it again in 2-3 years. Typically, they are taking about $1 per day from you, which is a lot more money than data mining would make them. So everything they do is about making that relationship positive so you buy the next device. That includes making better products and supporting existing products well and not data mining the user. Unlike Microsoft or Google, the user is Apple’s only customer. They have to please the user. Microsoft has to please hardware makers, and Google has to please advertisers.

    If you compare Facebook and Ping the answer is right there. Facebook is free, so they have to data mine you to make money. Ping is part of iTunes Store, you have to create an iTunes account with a credit card or gift card and a key part of the activity is buying music to put on your iPod. Ping essentially pays for itself, it doesn’t have to steal from you.

  • kibbles

    agreed. FB ceo zuckerberg has a documented disregard for users privacy. their business depends on mining your data. apple, OTOH, has a business that depends on pleasing its users.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_U2H7S4MG6PLQUVOA2CFNMZ2QUQ Ric Desan

    Yeah this going to be a HUGE success on that awesome iTunes software they have (sticking finger down throat.)

  • Anonymous

    iTunes is not closed, so you’re not making any sense at all.

    The music you buy in iTunes Store is open ISO MPEG-4, you can play it on Apple devices or on any consumer electronics device. For example, BlackBerry, Droid, EVO, Windows Phone 7, Windows or Ubuntu PC’s, Web browsers, set-top boxes, even camcorders. You can use a credit card or if you don’t have one you can use a gift card you buy at your supermarket. You can import music from another vendor into iTunes, or you can import CD’s into iTunes. Your entire iTunes music library is stored locally on your own PC in open ISO MPEG-4 and open XML, the universal format for data exchange between applications. And iTunes is easy enough that our proverbial grandmothers use it. It’s open formats, open commerce, open data, and open to people of any technical background.

    Facebook does not use 100% open formats. Facebook does not allow the user to get their data out at all. I’m not sure why you think Facebook is open.

    On the artist side, it’s completely painless to get your music into iTunes Store. You can go through a traditional record company, you can go through an indie aggregator like CD Baby, or you can go directly to Apple through iTunes Connect, the way apps are done. You create and submit your work in 100% open standard formats: ISO MPEG-4 audio and W3C HTML5 artwork. You can make that work with any tools on any platform, but every Mac also comes with all the tools you need, and Apple’s Logic Suite of high-end music tools is about 1/4 the price of its competitors and is a widely-used classic toolkit that goes back to the 80′s when it was called Notator.

    So what exactly are you talking about? What is it that’s closed about iTunes? What is it that’s open about Facebook?

  • Anonymous

    The Facebook reference is a bug due to the last-minute removal of that feature before launch.

  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

    > “You can type their names into search or send
    > them emails inviting them to join.”
    > Okay, although being more open would work too!

    Email is actually about a million times more open than Facebook.

    > As MediaMemo’s Peter Kafka noted:
    > “Maybe Apple plans on joining the rest of
    > the Web, via an open API that will let
    > Facebook, Twitter et al–maybe even
    > the to-be-launched Google (GOOG) music
    > service–play nicely with Ping. We’ll see.”

    The whole iTunes Store is currently exposed to the Internet via an API, and has been for some time, so I’m not sure why Peter is so skeptical.

  • http://blog.timletscher.com/ Tim Letscher

    Is it just me or does Phil looks wildly uncomfortable in that interview? Every comment out of his forced smile sounded like mechanical corporate speak.

    Jury’s still out on whether this service will go anywhere, but why not at least let me “like” (better yet, “love”) songs while I’m listening to them instead of needing to journey over to the iTunes store? Weak sauce so far.

  • Anonymous

    you can already access it through itunes on your iOs device. Regardless it needs more features, right now its completely pointless, you cant do anything with it

  • Anonymous

    Desktop computer? Riiiiight.
    Case Design? Since when, and with what?
    Media Players, Um Rio was the first by a long shot.
    Music Stores, there were already on-line store before iTunes.
    Cell Phones, WM was touch long before the iPhone.
    App Stores? Online apps? Hmmm, I guess that’s never been done.
    Tablets? Give me a break! Windows was on tablets 10 years before the iPad.

    Apple copies, period.

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t say there couldn’t be. Why did you go there? Are you worried about something?

  • Anonymous

    You guys have some serious coolaid issues. Step away from the punch bowl.

  • Anonymous

    Actually, they didn’t pioneer any of those things…

  • Anonymous

    I’m not in any way defending Facebook (I don’t even have a Facebook account due to the fact I dislike it and other social networking sites so much), but the whole privacy issue could be avoided if people would stop posting all their “private” info online… Facebook can only show what YOU feed to it, common sense would dictate that if you don’t want your private info available to anyone, don’t post it ANYWHERE online. Sadly, common sense isn’t very common these days…

  • Anonymous

    Ironically Apple appears to be offering its own version of onerous conditions. There is to a new mandatory Ping-related T&C on my iPhone that I am told must be accepted, after reading 55 iPhone pages of content if I want to protect my privacy, to get to new iPhone apps.

    I logged onto my iPhone today, went to download a new App, and received the following message:

    “iTunes Terms & Conditions Have Changed: Before you can proceed you must read & accept the new Terms & Conditions”

    When I hit ok – I was presented with this page of content:

    “New terms have been added to the iTunes Store Terms and Conditions with respect to Ping, which allows you to follow friends and favorite artists to find out what they are listening to… By opting in to Ping, you agree that information that you provide and information about your activity on the iTunes Store, may be shared in the manner described in the Terms and Conditions. If you do not want others to view any information about you, you should not opt in to Ping.”

    This was then followed by a 55-page iPhone T&C scroll bar / reader with the header “iTunes Store Terms & Conditions and Apple’s Privacy Policy. Please read and agree to the terms and conditions below to continue using the iTunes Store.”

    So, where’s the opt-in here? When did Apple become the Big Brother of forced social sharing?

  • Anonymous

    Apple / Jobs wanted to abolish DRM, but legal agreements with music studios would not allow this to happen…Eventually, things changed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/avijust4u Avinash Zala

    Cool Stufff…………..

  • http://www.socialmedianews.com.au social media news

    i am sure Facebook and Apple will be able to work together once they sort out their issues.

    If Google is putting iTunes links on all Youtube songs/vids and they are considered ‘enemies’ – i’m sure Apple & FB will come to terms.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/O4GGK77YQ2OXXI4WJ7PSYTU7UM Slick Rick

    Long live Apple and death to the haters!

  • http://www.largepot.net Large Pot

    I like this article! Will come again next time for sure, thank again

  • http://twitter.com/UlrichDesign Travis Ulrich

    Ping should at the very least have a Facebook Like button.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=864590550 Vaughn S. Cordero

    ..and the (Apple) Newton ‘Pad predated Win Tablets by roughly the same amount. And predated Palm too (before you change feet).

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

What’s happening is that we might, in fact, be at a time in our history where we’re being domesticated by these great big societal things, such as Facebook and the Internet. We’re being domesticated by them, because fewer and fewer and fewer of us have to be innovators to get by. And so, in the cold calculus of evolution by natural selection, at no greater time in history than ever before, copiers are probably doing better than innovators. Because innovation is extraordinarily hard.

— Mark Pagel, fellow of the Royal Society and professor of evolutionary biology, in conversation with Edge.org