Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Cablevision Complains (Very Quietly) About News Corp.'s Web Blackout

Over the weekend, News Corp. briefly pulled down Fox shows from Cablevision customers’ Web browsers.

That’s an unprecedented move in the ongoing fight between cable providers, broadcasters and networks over programming fees. And the news was a big deal for the digerati and people contemplating the future of video.

But it doesn’t seem to have registered in the broader world, and you have to work hard to find any mention of the story in old-media news outlets. And even Cablevision, which uses any ammo it can in the PR fight against Fox and News Corp. (which also owns this site), hasn’t said much about it.

Here, for instance, is Cablevision’s newest message to its customers. If you fast forward to the 1:35 mark, you’ll find a two-sentence description of the Web blackout. But hard to believe many Cablevision customers will be sticking around to hear this one:

At the very least, blacking out part of the Web sounds scary. So why is Cablevision so (relatively) quiet on this?

Two theories, which are not mutually exclusive:

  • It’s not worth complaining about because this stuff doesn’t really resonate with consumers–at least, not in the way that losing access to NFL games and play-off baseball does. No one spent Saturday evening or Sunday afternoon in a bar because they couldn’t watch “Glee” on Hulu.
  • It’s not worth complaining about because Cablevision and News Corp. are actually on the same ideological page when it comes to this stuff. Neither side is really that happy about free TV shows on the Web. The only real difference the two sides have is about money: News Corp. wants to get more of it for its programming, while Cablevision wants to pay less.

On a related note: I still don’t understand why News Corp./Fox backed off so quickly on Saturday, once news of the blackout got out.

There’s no official reason, but there were mutterings about the technical difficulty of cutting off access to Cablevision TV subscribers while leaving Cablevision’s Internet-only subs alone. But hard to believe that News Corp. didn’t think that one through in advance. Same goes for any “optics”-related reason–the whole point of a move like this was to generate publicity, right?


comments so far. Add yours.

  • mitrichr

    Cablevision picked a bad time to pick a fight, FIOS has come to much of its territory and is aggressively courting new business.

  • Anonymous

    This could get ugly – what if Cablevision decided to retaliate and cut off all internet access for it’s customers to any and all NewsCorp related websites?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FUMRUOES7MHR3Q7L37ZMPSXLAY passinthru

    That’s exactly my theory for why they backed off on their Hulu blackout. Cablevision might have turn around and cut off Fox News, Fox Sports, WSJ online, Hulu, mySpace and a host of other NewsCorp online properties. I’m sure that was stated or implied.

    Newscorp is treading a fine line here. They still depend on the pipe owners to deliver their content, both online and on tv.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AQR33BSTZ25BJSI32ENKALE5DQ Jared

    With so much of mass media supporting Democrats it would be a bit foolish for Newscorp, owned by uber Republican Rupert Murdoch, one of the largest financiers of the Koch brothers created and astroturfed Tea Party, to push too hard and end up with his Republican propaganda rabidly anti-Democrat Fox channels off the air.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

While it’s tempting to see the Huffington Post’s Pulitzer as a “big win for new media,” or something like that, the real story is that these organizations — the Huffington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post — are becoming more like each other. Old media and new media are increasingly antiquated terms.

— Journalism professor Jay Rosen to HuffPo media writer Michael Calderone (via GigaOM)