Arik Hesseldahl

Recent Posts by Arik Hesseldahl

If Speed Matters, Why Is American Broadband So Slow?

The Communications Workers of America have completed their latest survey of broadband connections in the U.S., and if the point wasn’t already well-established, then they’re here to remind you: Broadband connections in America are slow and service availability is lousy or non-existent in many areas, and that’s leaving a lot of people–millions actually–at a severe educational, economic and cultural disadvantage.

Here are a few highlights:

  • Half of all U.S. residential broadband connections fall below the minimum speed established by the Federal Communications Commission of four megabits per second down and one megabit up. That definition of what constitutes “broadband” is however all of six months old.
  • The median download speed was three megabits per second and 595 kilobits up, and these have only improved a little bit since the 2009 survey. At the rate the U.S. is going it will take 60 years to catch up with South Korea, where broadband network speeds are legendary, averaging 34 megabits per second.
  • Only one percent of broadband connections in the U.S. run at 50 megabits per second down and 20 up, meeting the FCC’s goal for the year 2015.
  • The report points out a few other findings from the FCC’s research: As many as 100 million people–roughly one in three–don’t have access to broadband at home, and of those, 24 million can’t get it if they want it, usually because they live on the wrong side of a seemingly arbitrary line on some map. Others say it’s too expensive or that they simply don’t know how to use it.

    The 68-page report (PDF) goes on to break down the broadband situation in each state and a few U.S. territories.

    The CWA released the report at a press conference in Washington, D.C., today, and FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski was on hand to lend his support and talk about his plans to reform the Universal Service Fund so that besides funding telephone service in rural areas, which was the reason it was created, it can be used to help fund broadband deployments in markets where service is limited for one reason or another. He also talked about getting some of the hurdles out of the way of private companies, so that when they choose to build infrastructure they can move fast. Simply cutting red tape can reduce the deployment costs by 40 percent.

    Below is a grab of the CWA’s speed map of the U.S. (Click on it to zoom in.)

    Update: And here’s a video of today’s press conference at the National Press Club. Genachowski is the second speaker.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • m. D.

    its cuz people dont understand the significance of net neutrality, and no one is concerned why broadband companies dictate to the user what their pricing models are, rather then the other way around.

    every time the FCC has stood up to cable and ISP companies, they get slapped, and not just by industry, but also by uninformed consumers, who think that big business should tell us what we pay

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_EU7WIX7YW5TEZIBXWLAL4EQFNA katgod

    Here is my ATT story. I have been using Pacbell which is now ATT for over a decade now and I was only recently able to get more than 1.5 Mbits/sec on my downlink, my uplink is about .4 Mbits/sec. I had many conversations with ATT over the last year trying to get to this speed and was repeatedly told I couldn’t get this speed. I was about to change to Comcast but decided to try ATT one last time as they kept saying they could give me this faster speed at their web site if I didn’t have landline phone service. This does not make sense but I decided to see what would happen if I ignored this requirement as I had a landline. Well they finally did it and they didn’t seem to care that I had a landline. I am now in the process of getting the billing straightened out but that looks like it will happen also. So after a decade in Cupertino, Ca. close to the heart of Silicon Valley I can get about 2.5 Mbits/sec. down and .4 Mbits/sec. up. What great progress we are making.

  • Anonymous

    Because Companies in this country make sure that THEY are the only ones in most of their areas and then they don’t upgrade whatsoever because they don’t have to. We see it CONSTANTLY

  • Anonymous

    I suspect the real reason is because cable companies are afraid of losing out to on demand like Hulu, Netflix etc if the download speeds increase.

    Also it gives them an excuse to charge more for higher speed connections.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Wayne-Caswell/1113005314 Wayne Caswell

    Yes, speed matters, but the goal of 100Mbps is not aggressive enough. We need gigabits to each household to enable the innovation and apps that will be possible in 10 years.

    There’s still too much focus on PRIVATE companies and Universal Service funding of their investments. When setting public policy and developing broadband plans for the next decade, we must remember that the same companies that made promises in the mid-1990’s to get public funds and regulatory concessions in the Telecom Act of 1996 got the funding but broke their fiber deployment promises.

    Per those promises, 86M US households should ALREADY have broadband connections of at least 45 Mbps in each direction. The networks were to be everywhere equally, including in rural towns and low-income neighborhoods, and open to ALL competition. That, of course, never happened, and instead our nation lost its broadband and tech leadership. I think it’s one of the largest scandals in American history – bigger than Enron and WorldCom and Bernie Maydoff.

    At the core of our poor broadband performance is our reliance on private companies with a profit motive to redline rural and low-income communities and only deploy network capacity when market demand justifies it. That’s because for-profit companies measure success in financial terms rather than social ones. They also pose a Chicken-v-Egg dilemma where the innovative apps of the future can’t even be developed until the networks are fast enough and widely deployed.

    An alternative approach is with open-access to public networks, like the interstate highway system, where every service provider can connect to the network and thus reach every subscriber, and where success is measured by real competition, affordability, access, and dramatic improvements in education, healthcare, commerce, employment, transportation, energy use, national security, and other social measures. Today’s networks are no longer used just for voice or television. They have become essential to commerce and life in the Digital Age and should be managed as a public utility.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Facebook bought the thing that is hardest to fake. It bought sincerity.

— Paul Ford, writing about FaceTagram in New York Magazine