Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

The Men and No Women of Web 2.0 Boards (BoomTown's Talking to You: Twitter, Facebook, Zynga, Groupon and Foursquare)

In one memorable episode of the famous old short films “The Little Rascals,” after not getting invited to a party, the Our Gang little dudes decided to form their own group, comically called “The He-Man Woman-Haters Club.”

In other words: No girls allowed!

While it was wink-wink cute when Spanky, Alfalfa and Buckwheat huffed and puffed about keeping out Darla–which they never ever could do–back in the last century, it’s not quite as adorkable when it comes to the boards of all the major Web 2.0 hotshots these days.

That would be Twitter, Facebook, Zynga, Groupon and Foursquare, none of which have any women as directors.

As in zero.

What’s most remarkable is that most of these start-ups are run by what I consider enlightened and open-minded entrepreneurs, mostly young enough to be part of a generation more inclined to value equality and diversity in the workplace.

In addition, each of these companies has a massive base of women consumers, in some cases well over 50 percent of its audience.

Thus, it would seem logical that in casting about for those to help guide these companies, one or two women leaders might slip in.

To be fair, it’s not for lack of trying, but of completion, as was the case with Twitter’s recent addition of three new board members.

They were longtime Silicon Valley exec Peter Currie, Flipboard CEO and co-founder Mike McCue and former DoubleClick leader David Rosenblatt.

All are deeply qualified for the Twitter board, which is obviously prepping for its next stage of growth and maturity.

But in its search, the San Francisco microblogging site did not manage to cast the net quite wide enough.

While sources said at least one prominent online woman exec was considered, there were some legitimate issues with her appointment, and it was not completed.

Still, one might imagine Twitter could have tried harder to find other workable choices.

Currently, the Twitter board is made up of the new trio, as well as Benchmark Capital’s Peter Fenton, Union Square Ventures’ Fred Wilson, Bijan Sabet of Spark Capital, CEO Dick Costolo and co-founders Evan Williams and Jack Dorsey.

Things are not any better over at Facebook, which has several prominent women execs running the show, most especially its high-profile COO Sheryl Sandberg.

But, inexplicably, though she does attend board meetings, she is not yet a director of Facebook, nor is any other woman.

In fact, here is Sandberg on topic at a recent TED event for women, in an eloquent speech titled “Why We Have So Few Women Leaders”:

Instead, the Facebook board is all men, all the time, composed of CEO and co-founder Mark Zuckerberg, prominent techie and venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, investor Peter Thiel, Accel Partners’ Jim Breyer and Washington Post head Don Graham.

It is no better at three of the most prominent recent Web 2.0 start-ups, which one source attributes to the lack of woman VCs, who are often the first board members after major investment rounds.

At Zynga, the hot social gaming company in San Francisco, it continues, with an all-male board, despite a very heavily female audience for its casual social games.

That would be co-founder and CEO Mark Pincus, COO Owen Van Natta, investor Bing Gordon of Kleiner Perkins, investor Reid Hoffman and Brad Feld of the Foundry Group.

The same is true at woman-targeted–spas, spas and more spas–social buying site Groupon, which has an unusually large board for a start-up and made up of–as per usual–all men.

The list: Co-founder and CEO Andrew Mason, Accel Partners’ Kevin Efrusy, former AT&T President and COO John Walter, New Enterprise Associates’ Harry Weller and Peter Barris, former AOL exec Ted Leonsis, 37Signals co-founder Jason Fried and early investors Eric Lefkofsky and Brad Keywell.

And, much smaller, is Foursquare’s board, which is the trio of co-founder and CEO Dennis Crowley, co-founder Naveen Selvadurai and Union Square Ventures’ Albert Wenger.

New investors–Ben Horowitz of Andreessen Horowitz and O’Reilly AlphaTech Ventures’ Bryce Roberts–have observer status and both are, needless to say, dudes.

There is no question it is tough to make sure there is a good balance of qualified women leaders to men in tech–it is an issue we wrestle with every single year for the program of speakers at our own All Things Digital conference, although we are most excellent on this issue on our Web site and conference staff.

But it can be done, especially at public tech companies. Google has two women on its board of nine directors; Yahoo has three of 10; even Oracle has two of a dozen.

But a grand total of zero at the leading companies of Web 2.0 is not just a coincidence.

It’s a shame.

Tomorrow, BoomTown will post a list of great women who would be superb directors for any of these companies, but until then, let’s not follow in Spanky’s steps:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_M4P3436XVDZ55KYENDCVNHS3EU IanF

    These companies are the titans of the industry and some of the most successful companies in the world. Equality isn’t about going out of your way to hire non-male directors its about refraining from choosing men over women because they are men. The success of these companies makes this article and its point worthless. I’m all for the advancement of women, especially in developing countries where it has proven to help economic growth in poor countries but whining about not being invited into the club is a pathetically wrong way to go about it.

  • http://twitter.com/nexcerpt Gary Stock

    Absolutely. If anything, I relate better to women than to men. Here, for example, I articulated the inconsistency of Kara’s two positions, rather than simply dismissing both — as I suspect most men would do.

  • http://twitter.com/nexcerpt Gary Stock

    Well said. I predict two primary theories in objection: 1) women at CXO/Board level have consciously suppressed (or are isolated from) many such sensitivities, or 2) such sensitivities preclude achievement in those circles.

    Here may be a more nuanced statement of your point: women more likely have been aware of such sensitivities ~at some time in their lives~, or currently are aware of them ~for other people~. That is, female Board members may not necessarily offer the perspective of “other women” (very few of whom, after all, serve at their level). Rather, they may contribute the perspective of “mothers,” or “sisters” (which they may be) or of “younger women” (which they all once were ;-)

    I’d point out, too, that there ~are~ men who are similarly sensitive, whose needs are rarely respected. Having a woman on the Board might do more to attract sensitive men to a product or service. This, of course, presumes that members of the Board actually make product or service decisions… lolz

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eric-Bishop/100001558753073 Eric Bishop

    Amy, the vast majority of these board seats are given to representatives of firms that have made large equity investments in the company or have people who have founded wildly successful internet companies or both. You want a clue? Fine, the people who get seats at the table are the people who discover the idea for, design, build and pay for the table AND the people who’ve already thrown the best dinner parties at their own table, NOT people who sit on the sidelines until it the table’s built and then bang on the door just to proffer a self-serving argument for why they deserve a place at the table that THOUSANDS of others have just put their heart and soul into. That said, if I were facebook, I’d have given Oprah a seat at the table…in fact, I’d have begged her to take it.

  • http://allthingsd.com/boomtown Kara Swisher

    Actually, I am.

  • http://allthingsd.com/boomtown Kara Swisher

    Hey, you really are kind of whiny in this comment. Wait, that’s just an insult for women!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_M4P3436XVDZ55KYENDCVNHS3EU IanF

    So I take it since you’re getting defensive that you don’t have a real response. Sure you can call me whiny, I’m whining about the poorly thought out arguments in your article.

  • http://enrique-gutierrez.com nrek

    I guess with this logic, I can say:

    “I think it’s shallow that the web-space is powered by rich guys that made it through the first bubble or bring big dollars to the table.”

    That type of argument is ludicrous and fallible, much like this blog post. The base is fundamentally flawed, and though gender plays an underlying role in every industry in the United States (and world), the tech-space doesn’t not (collectively) proactively exclude women.This post reads like hatorade flame-bate. If that’s the case, awesome job getting the traffic, hope the ad-revenue is worth the strike against integrity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=422553 Anonymous

    Hey Michael, have you ever been on a board? Their main job is to hire and fire the CEO. Just a wild guess that having a woman on the board will at least change the conversation.

  • Anonymous

    I was with you until the “troll sitting in a cave 20 hours” crack.

    So, in your opinion only pretty women who don’t like to work too hard should qualify for board seats then?

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Arguing online is like wearing a sharkskin vest. You look like a jerk.

— Anil Dash, in Businessweek’s How To issue